Last Notes
ya ur right, The problem is not our Internet. I checked online and it says it goes threw ubisucks severs.
The noise is immediately cancelled after shifting lens from “number go up” to “love is the cure” ✨
Good morning and pura vida.
Peace in the now is the true wealth.
🧡
https://blossom.primal.net/4f104f782a66fa34ad14b7f75052cc0897b4f4e76acdb1934614333804c2fbd7.jpg
#nevent1q…j6e0
Generational kitchen equipment incoming. #coffeechain
https://haven.nostrfreedom.net/9fd8e6091fe1394903c6e745c18cb7fe4edccb0ac23576b6aff5ad1a08d0ffcf.jpg
I actually noticed that with nak --- it isn't showing proof-carrying events returned from my inkan relay. When I get a chance I'll fix up my own version of nak to work with these.
When working through this, I noticed that there are two issues that can be thought of separately:
1. disseminating OTS proofs to relays;
2. making the proofs available to clients.
For proof dissemination, any sensible Nostr event shape will work. I think an addressable event with lots of tags for indexing (which can be skipped when not needed) works best, I've been sticking with my 31045s so far.
For making the proofs available to clients, the crucial thing is that the client needs to get the proofs synchronously with the reference event, i.e. the proofs should basically be spliced into the reference event.
So on that picture, the basic role that relays should play is to collect up available proofs and pre-verify them, select the best one (i.e. the one with the lowest block height) for each reference event, and then splice it into the reference event when it's sent to the client.
Is my current thinking.
noffer1qqsrf5h4ya83jk8u6t9jgc76h6kalz3plp9vusjpm2ygqgalqhxgp9gpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumrfva58gmnfdenjuur4vgpqw6mfv3mkzunsqvqsyck7fjn
plausible deniability server/relay + client:
- when you post to the server, you specify a symmetric encryption key, using that key to encrypt the content. but you don't tell the server the key
- any client displaying the content should take a key as an argument (url param would make for easy sharing), and attempt to decrypt the cyphertext clientside using said key
- if you provide the correct key, you can view the cleartext in the client. the server never knows what data it's storing - but for users, sharing the clear version is trivial: just share a url that includes the key.
- extra protection: the server/relay doesn't accept any cleartext content, so there's no moderation burden.
@nprofile…kype does this get around the server owner's responsibilities re: content and liability?
Сетевые государства уже здесь, и они растут день ото дня. Вопрос не в том, появятся ли они, а в том, гражданином какого ты хочешь быть? В мире, где каждый может выбирать свою онлайн-реальность, выбор за тобой. Но помни, каждый выбор имеет последствия. Какое будущее ты хочешь построить для себя?
@nprofile…mle2 and @nprofile…vy84 keep cranking out the #demu tunes and the good vibes are off the chart. 🎸 Great show as always. Show them some support.
https://fountain.fm/episode/HhQ1xSy9ycoqHaIFgu61
#v4vmusic #decentralizedmusic #moonwrecker #shadowmusic
Сетевое государство Баладжи — это не просто научная фантастика, а реальность, к которой мы приближаемся с каждым днем. В этом государстве каждый пользователь Nostr, каждый Lightning-узел и каждый участник DAO играют важную роль в поддержании и развитии инфраструктуры.
В мире, где границы определяются не территорией, а консенсусом, что такое страна в эпоху криптовалют и блокчейна?
Balaji's Network State isn't just happening, it's accelerating. Nostr, with its open protocols and pub/sub model, is a catalyst. Each user, node, and channel isn't just a participant, but a building block. As more join, the network's resilience and value grow exponentially. Lightning's layer-2 enables trust-minimized, near-instant transactions, fueling this growth.
It needs an advanced search options menu with time brackets, keywords, and user-specific filters. I want to be able to find my first note.
I "read" The Great Taking (Guy Swan did). Was good, and you make a good point.
I was a bit confused, for a moment, as it was a regional holiday last Thursday.
Happy Corpus Christi!
In my view, PoW dynamically gets more difficult for a spammer as they spam. It becomes an incredibly difficult barrier to overcome.
Or you can imagine the worst possible barrier to justify your argument.
It's June, it's after noon, I'm sitting on the porch enjoying a nice spring day. This never happens. There's a cool breeze blowing and it's finally not raining. Almost makes up for my lack of croissants.
https://cdn.midjourney.com/video/1f8c4e8c-a50d-431a-8064-b9a009c2d87f/2.mp4
So I suppose the actual answer is "being a good daughter-in-law".
https://cdn.midjourney.com/f5aeaec3-5b39-4568-aa12-cca3ac314590/0_0.png
📰 **In this week's issue:**
🗞️ **BREAKING**
Bitcoin Civil War Erupts as Developers Clash Over Censorship and Future Work
Bitcoin is tearing itself apart. A censorship firestorm, a controversial proposal to ban non-monetary data, and a mysterious Reddit ban have exposed deep divisions among core developers, igniting fears of a network-splitting fork. Find out why the fight over BIP-110 is about far more than just technology.
https://image.nostr.build/8eff54adc931f2981d95fa09700f6de9cca18b9fa5ef1041268abf5ed336fc28.jpg
✍️ Author: NM team
🔗 https://nostrmag.com/article/w23bitcoin02
📈 id#239278188
I’ve been posting with POW all day… has not hurt my experience in any meaningful way. You’ve seen my posts.
Why are you saying this will hurt real users, exactly? Real users aren’t spamming the relays, in your scenario you would punish them with higher PoW for *what reason*? That would be the only logical conclusion: you decided to treat spammers and normal users the same so their experience would suffer.
Why not both? I vote stupid DEI hire that became crooked over the span of her career.
There's a branch and the leaves need to be blown off.
Everyone knows you only take out a bitcoin loan once every four years at the bottomest of bottoms. Time to go all in at 50K! This is not financial advice.
new read up. "mining at a loss" is an existential problem for leveraged industrial miners. for a small operator stacking below spot, it's closer to the design.
the network doesn't care that you're underwater. that's the point. ↓
https://primal.net/e/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzpcwr3sccfhvf8rpr7ns44tuuyctaajvke674mtrrlqcpv48lna55qq256s6twqm5ysm2vdp9w3fsf3n8ynj4ty6hyh8ramq
#bitcoin #mining #bitcoinmining
Five total, but two did not survive. So three pups it is!
She pulled that trashbag into the whelping box and won't let me take it out. It's her first time as a mother and she's a little frantic figuring out what to do. So far so good, though. https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/8a671ef89f20da82dff5b501618d72a58a401f4a79469e3c15f96fbe1e8c0bc1.jpeg https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/461a5bb3693397ccbb18fdaadb9d376b81f993606a4cd09d0817807b46cc98fc.jpeg
#nevent1q…jerd
😂 Sounds good. Fake it 'til you make it.
Ugh right, I don't want to stop what I'm doing.
https://i.nostr.build/IDxTEpwXmgnuKS45.png
#nevent1q…0w9m
I think I got you here: earlier you said that the problem with dynamic PoW was identifying reliably and when I give you obvious ways to do it you are now saying that if you had this you wouldn’t need PoW.
So did you lie earlier or what?
Like, kinda, yeah? Good marketing anyway. "Don't sell the bottom, borrow and reap the gains!"
OTOH, now is probably a good time for one 🙃
I dunno, there's argument for taking loans out now more than at higher prices, if you think we're near a bottom and don't wanna sell.
I'm definitely too scared of that stuff to even dabble, but if you believe they are safe and operate as advertised, you'd expect that, no? Just weird you never hear about loans except at ATHs. Top signal stuff I guess. Maybe it's just companies responding to the higher demand when there's more euphoria, but if I were in charge of marketing I'd push for loans now 🤷♂️
whaaaaat the fuck is this?! this is so scary looking
no live stream today! ubisoft severs aren't working!
Fun prediction:
Strategy has been hammering STRC this week, causing the price to de-peg to $93, and using the proceeds to buy a lot of BTC
https://image.nostr.build/285caedc576a2d8a8580c6c7ef372f866ff6e44b1b44322fa150e1d507dbbb96.png
Saylor will only have power over me if I choose/allow myself to be at the bottom of a control hierarchy that he bought himself to the top of by a series of voluntary transactions where the recipient determined they'd rather have Saylor's coins than whatever else they could have in exchange instead.
do you not see how that is fundamentally different than the alternatives?
also, your premise is flimsy: the "problem of concentration of wealth" is not a problem to be solved - and definitely not by the base layers of a monetary technology. it's a natural result of many people valuing what someone else is providing. "solving" that "problem" in any way beyond emergent collective voluntary choices is a slippery slope to (artificially and likely coercively) removing the incentives that encourage an individual to innovate and create value in the first place. ..which is how you make sure civilization never emerges.
They don’t care either way. A person with certain incentives will bypass whatever small obstacles you put in front of them.
I really don’t see how it makes any sense to potentially (assume you have scale) make all the users of your protocol do additional computation to pretend like it’s doing anything at all to thwart an attacker who has every means of bypassing whatever silly barrier you put in front of them.
Then why would I need PoW
GM Morning! Sending you good vibes for a fantastic day and #Bitcoin rally.
You have, oof. I feel like a dick for appearing to be kicking people who might be down, but not what I'm intending (maybe a tiny bit, I'm no saint). I'm mostly interested in how smooth and calm the companies are with volatile downturns. Also, you'd think now would be a good time to promote those products, "don't sell, borrow at the bottom", but it seems like crickets :/
Yeah, based on that simplified scenario that you posted sure. And of course relays can’t identify anyone reliably by IP, pubkey, follow list, structural text similarity, none of that could possibly ever work.
It hurts real users while doing absolutely nothing to prevent attacks. Whether they spend $0 or $100 doesn’t change that they will continue.
With PoW the only solution is to make it prohibitively expensive with a ton of bits, which disproportionally affects users.
Then there will be paid PoW services so you don’t have to wait a minute to post to get higher bits, and oh wait, we have reinvented paid relays
However, developers have managed to make very accurate spam filtering systems for other social media, email, forums, etc. And none of them use PoW 🤪