Last Notes
Again with the buying ingredients 😒. Glad there's still a little bit of chicken soup left because I do not feel like cooking today. Tomorrow is a new day and I can use the ingredients then...
Nah, I stand on my opinion. If you didn't care you wouldn't have mentioned it to start.
Off topic...but I checked my toenails to see if they needed trimming and thought I'd remind you to do the same 🤣. We gotta look out for each other 🤝
If this is the case she's not putting her fingers back in my mouth!
down? up? sort? she dont have that many posts at all its right there. isnt this all public n stuff?
₿ Jordi Visser: The Entire Economy Is an AI Trade Now
Investor Jordi Visser returns to argue the entire US economy is now an AI trade: stocks are carrying consumption, the agentic era turned tokens into a chips-and...
Source: TFTC
🔗 https://www.tftc.io/jordi-visser-economy-is-an-ai-trade
#jamaica #news #business #tech
https://storage.ghost.io/c/77/f7/77f78434-a11f-4803-9c04-b15aaa2a8e69/content/images/2026/06/jordi-visser-economy-is-an-ai-trade-tftc.jpg
nevent1qqsvspky6vchff3fdk0jjxmxp6c332mkq5pswjrhkp9qvcs0t093fucplwjed
I love this style of pop art. I would use a cline that has this theme.
Ooooohhhh, in contrast to the "modern audience". Meaning, they want to miss the mark again, but with another term.
??????????????? That's just called gaming. What are these guys talking about. This is the most nothing burger article I've ever read. https://www.gamesindustry.biz/nobodys-making-games-for-the-retired-people-the-growing-yet-underserved-market-for-grey-gamers
When was the post last shared by somebody? Even if he looked at her profile because ... whatever ... liking her first post is not stalking.
Bear market rules: you get a boyfriend or fight someone.
Someone Just Redeemed a 15-Year-Old Physical Bitcoin, Scoring $1.78 Million in BTC
https://decrypt.co/369947/someone-redeemed-15-year-old-physical-bitcoin-scoring-1-78-million
The thing about fighting on the internet is that you typically reveal your biggest insecurities by how you attack.
Peace is a privacy necessity.
Yeah that would be a little weird I agree 😂
Ooh, tough. There's a 28-day cycle and the whole hourly microcycle and the bad hair day issues... ain't nobody got time for that.
https://media.tenor.com/DnAWGOGVQUQAAAAC/overly-complicated-benjamin.gif
Today's show - Special Guest Mix - Bstn - The Cat, The Beeps
Today we have another brilliant guest mix, this time courtesy of @bstn and his cat Caillou!
Really evocative sounds, feels like a movie! Enjoy :)
Graham Mushnik - The Cat - The Beast (Catapult Records)
Graham Mushnik – Troglodytes
Graham Mushnik - Prehistoric Tales
G.Lolli - Chiaroscuro A1 (Specific Recordings)
Scorpion Violente - The Wound (Bruit Direct Disques)
Rien Virgule - Trafic de Masques (La République des Granges)
The Monks - Oh, How To Do Now (Polydor)
HANK! - The Race (Self Released)
Calibro 35 - S.P.A.C.E. (Record Kicks)
Band of Susans - Hell Bent (Replica Nova)
Sibot - Mums the Word (Roastin’ Records)
https://pirate.mxtthxw.art/@thekalimerashow/episodes/special-guest-mix-bstn-the-cat-the-beeps
#Music #RSS #PirateRadio
Can we all use some stoicism? I don't get why cursing is necessary.
I did the same… but you said: hey that’s my girlfriend so I followed and she had two posts maybe I liked maybe I didn’t I don’t remember.
But it was the type of like that’s more of, oh cool you are on nostr. Here is some community engagement 🤷♂️
😂😂
https://media.tenor.com/4H4WTRKJHy4AAAAC/you-got-that-right-you-are-right.gif
1. Create regulations and restrictions for X good or service to centralize it.
2. De facto or outright ban free market for X, thereby creating a State monopoly.
3. Gaslight everyone and say that only the State can do X.
Classic
https://fountain.fm/episode/6fMJUQMq1cjULl2XsQ7n
No nukes, this would only escalate.
#nevent1q…gcwg
See this is a good example. Fact, you are not happy. Misrepresentation, you are not happy BECAUSE you are out of it. Attacks the misrepresentation he himself constructed.
Sometimes you don’t need to know much about a person to disqualify him, all you need is to spot the strategies they employ.
Lutar pelo Brasil significa sustentar essa oligarquia política imunda que vive no luxo às nossas custas
Who’s Felicia? The broad in this video?
Not if they are happily married, I presume.
Niggas really be figuring out saif.systems from first principles
#nevent1q…juxk
https://blossom.primal.net/b0eb88df4f6189df08213c3ae4c559e91d051b25dfdca530daf3a5255e7ae767.jpg
The petty fighting is so fucking boring, I’m over it.
The feed must be purged with fire.
The Malaysians be cooking 👀
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TLqL5Xmgfqc
It’s fun to remember that we went to 15K shitty fiat cuckbucks in December 22 and here we are 3.5 years later at 65k and the eejots are panicking 😂…..Doh !
I can turn this into audio for the thread — goes live once 550 sats land here. One zap or many.
Stop everything and make basmati rice with artichokes, green peas, dill, and lemon.
Ball and Chain (Live at Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, CA - April 12, 1968)
Big Brother & The Holding Company & Janis Joplin
#music #tunestr
https://song.link/i/1436092078
I knew about it. Did not know it was ready.
A husband has no moral right to initiate violence against his wife.
This is not primarily because women are morally superior to men, nor because men are incapable of suffering abuse. Men can be victims of abuse, including physical abuse. Rather, the prohibition arises from the nature of the relationship itself and the responsibilities entrusted to the husband.
A husband ordinarily possesses a natural physical advantage over his wife. In many marriages, he may also possess greater economic leverage, particularly when his wife is a stay-at-home mother or otherwise depends on the household income he provides. Even when legal protections, family support, or public institutions exist, a wife's first and most immediate environment is her home, and her primary relationship is with her husband. The home therefore carries a reasonable expectation of safety.
The husband occupies a position that is intended to provide protection rather than threat. His role is not merely to refrain from harm, but to serve as a source of security. Violence reverses that role.
For this reason, a husband's anger, frustration, humiliation, or sense of being criticized cannot justify initiating violence. A wife may express dissatisfaction, point out weaknesses, criticize failures, or communicate frustration. Sometimes her complaints may be justified; sometimes they may not. Yet none of these circumstances grants the husband permission to cross the boundary into violence.
Once that boundary is crossed, something more than a physical injury occurs. Trust is damaged. The wife can no longer assume that disagreements, criticism, or conflict will remain nonviolent. Even if the violence is limited, even if the husband later apologizes, even if both parties attempt to rationalize or excuse the incident, a new reality has been introduced into the relationship: the possibility that force may be used again.
The damage extends beyond the immediate event. A husband who permits himself to solve one problem through violence may gradually become willing to solve additional problems through violence. Boundaries that once seemed absolute become negotiable. What was once unthinkable becomes conceivable.
Children are also affected. They learn less from instruction than from observation. When they observe violence being used to resolve conflict within the family, they are taught that force is a legitimate means of obtaining compliance, expressing frustration, or settling disputes. This is a destructive social lesson that can echo across generations.
This principle does not require a husband to accept abuse. Self-defense remains distinct from aggression. A husband is not obligated to endure assault, nor is he required to tolerate conduct that places him in physical danger. The argument concerns the initiation of violence against a wife who is not presenting a physical threat and who has not forced the husband into a situation of immediate self-defense.
The moral duty of a husband is to exercise strength under restraint. Physical power creates responsibility, not entitlement. The stronger party bears a greater obligation to preserve safety, especially within the home. A husband who uses his strength to intimidate or injure his wife abandons the very purpose for which that strength ought to exist.
The standard, therefore, is simple: no degree of anger, frustration, insult, criticism, disrespect, or emotional provocation gives a husband the right to initiate violence against his wife. The duty to protect remains even when affection is strained, emotions are inflamed, and conflict is severe.
If I told you how long it's been since my last print and how much dust is probably on my machine I think I'd pick up a block on here 😂
That's right, I couldn't remember who else was there
Folks seem to like to keep their social graph separate from their nodes.
But I can see value in something like this.
https://blossom.primal.net/a48bf90dac3218206d672369dda147bf7931446fd24ae4d33e00b2dba0de679b.mov
He did some videos on M17 and FT2 that caught my eye a while back. Nothing recent, but that was because jail. Pretty sure a fat white boy pedo will have a rough time of it in prison, so that's nice.
Failure is one of our greatest learning tools.
sp_4c43bd1d.bc291ee6.05.6VWGU4PUX46V2PGF3QYBL5NZ2EA3Y3V4UYQSAXM3PNDMQMDQ4EY5KF44M5S6SZY.drift.gits.net
