zaytun

#FreePalestine 🇵🇸

Public Key

npub1wnw8s4eq2uwkhdvyue72m0w5u3zfhywuuk4nrunxeg3wac958n9st845pr

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8fhrc2us9w8ttkkzwvl9dhh2wg3ymj8wwt2e37fnv5ghwuz6rejcpremhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuatn9emks6t5v4hx76tnv5hxx6rpwsq3uamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv46juamgd96x2mn0d9ek2tnrdpshgzewaus

Publishing to

relay.us.whitenoise.chat

relay.eu.whitenoise.chat

Author Public Key

npub1wnw8s4eq2uwkhdvyue72m0w5u3zfhywuuk4nrunxeg3wac958n9st845pr

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-09-18 12:51:59 UTC

- reply

I will say, theres a british snooker player by the name of judd trump that doesn't deserve this. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

2026-09-10 15:27:05 UTC

#bitcoin is one large shitshow right now.
Its extremely discouraging that I would NOT be comfortable advising a company to implement a bitcoin strategy (be it savings or accepting payments) right now.
Bottom line (and it hurts to say this), the bitcoin eco-system is just not secure right now.
Meaning basically the only thing you could reliably do right now is self-custody.
How would you advise a brick and mortar shop to accept btc right now and why?
It used to be the downside was speculative/volatility.
Now, its just plain insecurity in the software you would use to interact with it, and that kills the whole use case for mass adoption.

2026-09-10 15:22:38 UTC

- reply

Sure, but how the fuck is that going for us atm 🥹

2026-09-04 16:29:47 UTC

- reply

What kinds of tweaking and optimizations? Care to share?

2026-09-03 06:29:19 UTC

- reply

Haha someone understood duress pins #prenup

2026-08-25 20:40:34 UTC

- reply

My dude, do you shit money AND heavily on laxatives?

2026-08-17 16:08:20 UTC

- reply

I understand the idea that 20% voted yay, 0% nay, 80% abstained. I agree this is problematic.
But I can name many core node runners who publicly were against bip110 and thought it was a bad idea.
So, although there was no URSF, it is safe to say that there was absolutely resistance to bip110 by many nodes.
Accepting this pragmatic observation changes almost the entire premise of the arguments @nprofile…dmel presents here.
And I say that even while continuously being convinced by him on many fronts. Kudos to him for his ability to convey his ideas and arguments in a very coherent, understandable way.
But I believe this particular premise is very important.
@nprofile…dmel - just for arguments sake -
If for one minute you, for arguments sake, you agreed to the idea that nodes running core AND nodes running non-bip110 knots, were all AGAINST bip110, (granted they were operating in the dark while signalling nodes were operating publicly, granted, leave that out for one second) - pragmatically re-considering from this standpoint the amount of nodes in the voting room voting YAY vs the amount of nodes voting NAY.
How would that change your perspective / decision to move on to another project?

2026-08-15 08:17:21 UTC

- reply

Interesting you think Mr. Scamson mow is captured. I'm not as sharp as you are, so I havn't noticed the things you feel are "obvious".
Are you willing to point me at the evidence to his scamminess, other than him being of a different opinion than yourself?
-----
On your point of it having taken 3.5 years to fix AND bitcoin hasn't died in those 3.5 years, why did bitcoin decide to die on exactly last saturday due to this 3.5 year old problem?
Maybe, just maybe, because it wasnt an URGENT enough problem that it required a RUSHED, contentious, "defend against existential threat"-level soft-fork?

2026-08-15 07:16:56 UTC

- reply

If anything, BIP110 blundered an opportunity to fix the very real problems it addressed. Imagine if Luke, via Knots had fought in the same arena as core.
Core made a policy change.
Luke managed to get adoption of his implementation that reverted that policy change.
In hindsight, why go the extra step in a rushed way? Had adoption of knots continued, that in and of itself would've been a viable response.
I agree with Samson Mow that the problem was not urgent enough to warrant a *rushed* soft fork.

2026-08-12 15:58:37 UTC

- reply

What a weird thing to block, ha?

2026-08-09 12:26:00 UTC

Is it in any way not recommendable to run knots 29.2?
#asknostr

2026-08-09 08:52:54 UTC

- reply

My other problem is, when core made the op return change, that made me mad, and I felt I had to stand up and show that I wouldnt be bullied to run that on my node, so I signalled hard by running knots.
But then knots implented code that I wasnt comfortable with, including automatic signaling for bip110 and even worse, automatically including the code for a hard fork.
Bear in mind, I've followed as much as I could on the sidelines from running a busy family life, so I might have misunderstood many details, but this is my understanding on things so far.
And so my point is, knots included code that I was suddenly "forced" to run and thats not okay either.
All of that is fixable by just not updating my node, but as bitcoiners, we deserve better options than "just dont update".

2026-08-09 08:52:20 UTC

- reply

I think my problem with this game theory perspective is that 18.000 nodes is not really sufficient is it?
Clearly then, 78.000 nodes didn't signal they wanted this change, so despite 18.000 being a significant amount of nodes it is not an overwhelming amount of nodes, right?

2026-08-09 08:29:38 UTC

- reply

The questions knots raised were / are 100% valid questions.
Seems the wider community just didn't care.
BIP110 was a wrong solution to a valid problem. This has been stated by many great minds in bitcoin.
The problem was it was also the *only* solution.
That puts real plebs in a difficult situation and creating the choice of "bad" or "worse".
I think core is "worse", but enough people didn't agree.
I think bip110 enforced the way it was, was horrible, but for me personally, I'd rather do that and win the rest of the community over than do nothing at all.
Samson Mow said on The bitcoin podcast, paraphrasing "core made the change, i didnt agree with it and gave them shit for it, but its done, they already did it, its over, so I moved on and stopped talking about it"
That doesnt sit well with me, to just say "ok, ill continue running your code"
And thats the feeling and attitude that pushed me to want something else.
I personally feel that "something else" was just running knots instead.
Clearly the BIP110 part of things was not the right call.
I think we as bitcoiners just need to be and do better.

2026-08-06 18:21:52 UTC

- reply

Would you care to answer this question that never received response from @nprofile…9kky or anyone else?
To be fair, I also disagree with the unfortunate way BIP110 was put forth, but I'm putting that detail aside and just trying to assess the pros and cons of the technical aspect.
I hope the question is clear.
Im just a simple noob pleb too man. I just want to be able to formulate a bitcoin tx in sparrow wallet, sign it with my signer, and send it to somewhere in the world, with nobody able to stop it and in the end verify by myself it went through okay.
That's my left side of the curve desire for bitcoin and any innovation on this protocol needs to just not fuck with all that, that'd be great.
#nevent1q…vwp5

2026-08-06 08:46:57 UTC

- reply

A virus that never existed?
Aight, one thing is to oppose the state-level attack on basic freedoms based on the pandemic. Unforgivable. The vaccines and the vaccine mandates were fucked up to say the least.
Another thing is to claim the virus itself never existed, when too many have experienced its effects first hand.
Instead of being a toxic maximalist, it seems you have tendencies to just be toxic, maybe.
I'll take your inputs with an extra grain of salt going forward.

2026-08-06 07:48:38 UTC

- reply

Bring forth your maximum toxic maximalism.
Give me your best toxic review of bitcoin core. Any critiques?

2026-08-05 12:15:29 UTC

- reply

I get the paranoia. But we need to remain logical. Paranoid, but logical.
Dice-generated seed +
Stateless device to help with the checksum word +
Stateless device (new session) to sign tx airgapped
What could logically be an attack vector?
The device is physically incapable of communicating with the outside world.
Let me know where I'm wrong or not paranoid enough.

2026-08-04 14:40:49 UTC

- reply

Nah no need man, just ask him at the next bitcoin conference

2026-07-31 21:56:27 UTC

For wise-asses moving the goalpost of securing your bitcoin today, you can royally go fuck yourself.
If a person has taken the steps to:
1. Buy a bitcoin only hardware wallet, which is widely respected and mentioned by most of the big bitcoin proponents in the space where one might be getting their info from, such as podcasters etc
2. Keeping it airgapped
3. Not even sharing home address during purchase to avoid wrench attacks
4. Taking good care to stamp seed on steel
5. Maybe even doing yearly drills to check up on funds and hardware
6. And lost their funds today despite all the above measures
7. NOT following the vendors guide under the subpage /paranoia
8. Being told to only do multi-sig only if very comfortable to avoid locking yourself out of funds
Then don't be coming at them today and say "you should have known you needed to roll dice too, it's your own fault"
The steps this person has taken were FAR BEYOND what is imaginable for a non-techie person and accusing them of not taking enough care to secure funds is bat-shit crazy to me and is simply evidence that this experiment has failed. Bitcoin has not been secure today. Loss of funds from highly secure setups has occurred.
"Best devs in the world" claim thoroughly debunked, now both on the bitcoin software implementations side AND the bitcoin hardware side.
This event is devastating and as much as the loss of funds breaks my heart it is also an identity crisis on my effort and belief in this incredible project.
Bitcoin has not been secure today and the threshold to actually make it secure has shown to be overwhelming and not at all ready for anyone who is not an expert in cryptography.
I'm just so devastated and this has been a hard day and i'm extremely tired and sad.

2026-07-31 21:33:06 UTC

- reply

Truth is, people who went through considerable effort to secure their funds, i.e. buy a hardware wallet, stamp their seed on metal, use the hw fully airgapped, etc etc, got their funds stolen today.
The security of bitcoin is stained and im curious to see how the market responds.
Im also curious to hear from @nprofile…qy52 and looking forward to his emergency episode of citadel dispatch where he goes through all relevant info and next steps, lessons and ofcourse, massive critique of his friend NVK and coinkite.
But that probably wont happen.

2026-07-31 20:44:06 UTC

- reply

We did not fucking make it in time. Im devastated.

2026-07-31 17:25:37 UTC

- reply

Im doing it by hand with them. Luckily, my orange pilling skills are shit enough that the blast radius is manageable for my case.
With that in mind, would you say its a solid strategy? I'm trying to avoid including exchanges.

2026-07-31 17:08:04 UTC

- reply

I need help with what to help affected people with.
My best guess at a solid strategy from here is:
1. Verify your seed phrase backup
2. Upgrade your cold card firmware
3. Generate new seed using the same coldcard and include dice rolls this time
4. Make test transaction from old seed to new seed
5. If 4. Is succesful, make transaction for the rest of your sats to the new seed
6. Order new hardware (3 different solid vendors) without doxxing your name, address or credit card
7. Setup multi-sig with the three new hardware wallets
8. Move funds to new multi sig setup
9. Obviously, Coinkite products are not part of the new setup.
This is my best guess right now, because a single sig sat holder who uses coldcard today probably does so because its the only hw they have available, arguably making it (ironically) the most secure emergency move today.
Please add insight if this strategy has flaws.
#asknostr
@nprofile…jejf
@nprofile…uc0e
@nprofile…502m
@nprofile…drx7
@nprofile…268u
I spam tagged the first few people I could think of who might have or are connected to solid insight.
Obviously nvk is not tagged, what a fucking joke.

2026-07-28 13:45:19 UTC

- reply

This is a cop-out response, and doesn't answer my question, agree? Btw. I totally get it. Its not an easy debate.
If knots is unsafe, I think bitcoin as a whole would benefit if you would help fix or at least point out any issues you encounter 🙏 maybe you've done that already, I dont know.

2026-07-28 13:34:09 UTC

- reply

Again, thanks for adding nuance.
I think your own wording is victim of your own bias, respectfully.
"Any group deciding".
Whatever technically goes in AND
Whatever the protocol signals should go in
Is arguably the common directive of bitcoiners as a community, you included.
So if BIP110 is the signal, its also your signal
If 100kb is the signal, its also your signal
I agree completely, no group should decide. But thats the idea behind general consensus, both protocol consensus and social consensus.
You, individually, choose to run core v19, so you are technically signalling some form of opinion.
You also would recommend people run v30 (in due time, when v32 released)
Are you comfortable recommending the average pleb to run software you think includes misguided changes?

2026-07-28 13:07:16 UTC

- reply

Thanks for your response.
Can I assume that this means you have no objection to the datacarriersize change in v30?
(Or the way it was merged despite controversy)?
If you'd add why you dont object that would be informative.

2026-07-28 13:02:46 UTC

- reply

Once core 32 lands, what would be your recommendation to the average pleb?

2026-07-28 13:00:58 UTC

- reply

Sorry, did you mistype 29 or wdym with 2 versions behind? You wrote v19.

2026-07-28 12:58:31 UTC

- reply

Would you advise the general pleb to do that also or is that only because you're technically comfortable running older software which likely doesnt include some more/less important security/bug fixes?

2026-07-28 12:57:11 UTC

- reply

This is not a bullseye post at all.
I feel like you're on a noble mission - but I'll call you out when I see you support bad takes. Hope you'll take that constructively.
I dont get the hate towards Odell.
There is no way he is a bad actor.
I personally feel he has approached the knots v core debate from a misguided angle, but that makes his take misguided, not a bad actor.
Also, why even care that he "went back to twitter".
He can do whatever he sees fit, and changing ones mind is perfectly healthy.
Im sure I wouldnt see you bashinh any prominent anti-bip110 person changing their mind to support bip110 today fx.

2026-07-28 12:44:06 UTC

- reply

Im curious what software you're running on your own node @nprofile…32sk

2026-07-20 15:07:20 UTC

- reply

Question for you, Derek.
Taking the bitcoin *you* love and believe in into consideration
AND
Taking a BIP110 valid transaction into consideration
------
In which ways do you disagree with the rule-set behind that BIP110 transaction?

2026-07-17 12:30:38 UTC

- reply

I would argue bitcoin had value even before the pizza purchase, but it was priced in fiat terms after that event.
I would also argue it is a stronger store of value today than it was at the time of the pizza purchase. (More decentralized, bigger network, yadda yadda)
Clearly, it is a better medium of exchange today than it was back then.
But it was a "good enough store of value" and a "good enough medium of exchange" that the pizza event was both economically desirable and technically possible.
They go hand in hand 🤷

2026-07-17 12:10:13 UTC

- reply

The chicken and egg problem is in your last sentence. If its not a good store of value to begin with, I wouldnt accept it as payment for my goods and services.
So it needs to bootstrap by doing a bit of both increasingly better over time. Not technically, but 'better over time' in terms of network effects.

2026-07-08 09:11:23 UTC

- reply

Whats been your biggest "freedom feeling maximizing self hosted service"?
I think mine is Immich.

2026-06-21 13:43:43 UTC

- reply

Wow wtf.
I strongly strongly assume its a scam, and wouldnt scan that QR with a dead device.
If you do actually own a "coldcard calculator" whatever that is, coinkite might have a data leak or its a personal attack?
Wildest i've ever seen if true.
@nprofile…32sk pitch in here

2026-06-13 16:57:10 UTC

- reply

Hey man, mention names, who are we talking about, im intrigued

2026-06-13 09:40:02 UTC

- reply

Wow thats a really small cast iron skillet.

2026-06-12 17:43:16 UTC

- reply

Wait wait hold up, what is this technique with the thin end not searing. 😦😦😦 that might be pretty smart???? So it doesnt overcook there ?????

2026-06-06 17:54:30 UTC

- reply

A mole made sure to fuck that up for me entirely. I killed one with my bear hands. His cousin moved in. True story.

2026-06-06 17:40:26 UTC

- reply

Dude its fucking hilarious. Im ashamed at how much I just want my lawn to be nice.

2026-05-31 12:34:51 UTC

- reply

Im so curious as to what content is on fuckstr, but im too afraid to check at this point.

2026-05-27 16:08:21 UTC

- reply

Listen, you can use stale beans, its not a crime. The experience is nicer and easier with fresh beans tho.
Dont waste more of this batch trying to dial in. If you drink it and say to yourself "mh, nice cup of coffee" then you're home free 😁
Next bag, try fresher beans. The perfect freshness is around 5 days old (actually too fresh is not great either).
I find a week old works great and I want to use them within 3 weeks ish. Thats fine enough for me. Some will religiously go for 2 weeks max, that doesnt work for me logistically.
When you get fresh bag of beans, run an extraction with these settings and remember to film it. We'll try to hit good settings within one or two extractions.

2026-05-27 16:03:12 UTC

- reply

Sob7anallah, i didnt know, but have had probably the most active day with my son since he was born

2026-05-27 16:00:34 UTC

- reply

Yes, still a bit too fast.
Also, seems like your beans aren't very freshly roasted, am I mistaken? Do you get them from a supermarket?

2026-05-27 14:39:04 UTC

- reply

Much better - u might have SLIGHTLY too little coffee in your portafilter / not tamping it hard enough / or literally one notch finer grain.

2026-05-17 07:58:07 UTC

- reply

Does it work with ashigaru as it used to with samourai? Reliably now?

2026-04-23 08:03:21 UTC

Apparently, I dont receive zaps when posting from Yakihonne.
I have albyhub running on my umbrel, and have a connection set up that I can see in yakihonne.
What am I doing wrong?
#asknostr @npub1yzv…rf8q

2026-04-19 19:05:18 UTC

- reply

Thanks for clarifying. Im just running the 35b model, (which you probably meant) and am impressed by it so far.
Whats your setup, if you have one running?

2026-04-19 10:27:37 UTC

- reply

Are you sure?
Tbf seems like they open sourced it same day you wrote this note.
https://cntechpost.com/2026/04/17/alibaba-open-sources-qwen3-6-35b-a3b-rival-larger-ai-models-coding/ https://image.nostr.build/80c8b6d4539b881183b5bb6f131f4d1891c70a6aa09d8914471217e2e2c57136.jpg

2026-04-19 10:21:01 UTC

- reply

I havn't reached the level where I know wgat cuda tensorfllw torch means.
Im wrapping my head around nvfp and mtp and a bunch of other acronyms though! Getting there!!

2026-04-18 12:34:27 UTC

- reply

I was driving the other day, minding my own business. The moon, beautiful on the sky. And I realized the hilarity in flat earth theory only being a thing because we, for good reason, have a hard time seeing the earth .... because we are on it.
But.
We are in fact able to observe other planets with a simple telescope and it hit me, that funny enough, all of them are round 😬😁
But noooooo the earth is special, the eaaaaarth muust be flat. 😬

2026-04-17 10:30:51 UTC

People have it backwards when they say "i dont have anything to hide, so I use [insert your favorite convenient closed source technology].
Its not you - its the big tech company - that clearly has something to hide about whats going on in that code base.
Anthropic is a great example of this, but it obviously extends to all of big tech.

2026-04-15 14:23:12 UTC

- reply

Are those MoE models? Thats the only way I can make those tok/s make any sense with the experience Ive had.
I tried the 35b MoE and just didnt find it intelligent enough to substitute cloud models. I even tried the qwen 3.5 122b-a10b which activates 10b at a time, and still found it not strong enough. Speed was fine though.
Have now moved back to testing the dense 27b instead. Its not fast but not unusable.
I will be trying out the NVFP4 quantized model with Multi Token Prediction to see if that fares any better.
Should have prefaced with my setup. Im running a single DGX spark 128gb unified.

2026-03-16 19:06:43 UTC

- reply

Explain the israel part.

2026-03-13 16:36:57 UTC

Still think this could be great @npub16c0…6nvr
#nevent1q…qjmc

2026-03-13 16:32:42 UTC

- reply

What can I do to help.

2026-03-13 16:08:20 UTC

- reply

Primal is not zero-config right? It requires email which is a really unfortunate tradeoff. Obviously easily solved for most techie people but its keeping me away from onboarding people via primal.

2026-03-10 11:14:12 UTC

- reply

Hey man, you and me both 🙏

2026-03-04 21:34:41 UTC

- reply

Why is IP an issue, is it not trivial to VPN around that obstacle? Should it not be default even?

2026-03-04 13:05:54 UTC

- reply

Why only to people you known IRL? Is it maybe because, if you offered it as a bitcoin business seeking to be profitable YOU MIGHT NEED TO GET CREATIVE ABOUT HOW PEOPLE TOP UP THEIR ACCOUNTS? 😂
The world is not ready to earn bitcoin. Only a few individuals are in such a glorious position.
You're bashing Alby because they are being pragmatic about the chicken and egg problem.
If you're not gonna offer a similar service then be constructive.
And if you have the balls to require people to EARN bitcoin - then have the balls to create a company that puts you in a position to actually employ people and then pay them in bitcoin.

2026-03-04 12:47:42 UTC

- reply

Yeah agree!! I'd rather use the service you're providing darth!! Waiting for it.
.
.
.
.
Oh. You didnt offer any did you 😬
Just chill man. You're incredibly valuable to the plebs with your guides and help, despite your toxicity.
You don't HAVE to be destructive.

2026-03-02 20:40:51 UTC

- reply

no its not man. We might disagree on whether bitcoin is money or not.
I say it its, you might say it sometimes is.
Lets be honest about disagreeing.
But under the assumption that bitcoin is money and only money except when spam finds its way through - then its not dangerous to say non-monetary data is unwanted.
On the other hand, it is dangerous to CHANGE a default setting in a major implementation of the protocol - to now signal to "spammers" that their spam is accepted on the blockchain.
If not STRICTLY necessary AND not widely accepted - dont merge changes.

2026-02-28 19:16:42 UTC

- reply

I wanna use maple, but paying for a year upfront in a market where I have no idea where AI is in 3 months is a big ask.
Why not accept monthly payments, @nprofile…u4p9 ? Most paying AI users are probably paying 20 bucks a month for whatever model they're using.
Accepting monthly payments at Maple would remove a big entry barrier for that entire segment.
Right now, you're asking me to let go of better models AND pay a much higher amount upfront.
You can easily fix one of those problems and have my tradeoff be *slightly worse models for better privacy".

2026-02-27 22:58:26 UTC

- reply

Commendable

2026-02-27 21:40:53 UTC

- reply

Hahaha I lol'ed

2026-02-24 11:02:01 UTC

- reply

why, thank you! 🥹

2026-02-23 19:37:14 UTC

- reply

I wrote this way back when, and still think it would be a nice way to organically promote nostr, but my notes kinda never go anywhere 🥹
#nevent1q…qjmc

2026-02-23 14:57:48 UTC

- reply

Yes, completely abandoning all faith in people who have otherwise showed integrity for a decade is problematic. Doing so seems immature to me. Obviously I could be wrong, but I'd rather be wrong and have had some faith in humanity than be right and lose anyway.
>> "not bitcoin driven"
I dont feel Odell has given us any reason to believe he is a bad actor.
In fact, him arguing from an emotional standpoint in latest RHR screams to me that he is shaken by the prospect of bitcoin failing as a result of this debacle - because he and his family rely on bitcoin.
>> "severity of problems bip110 tries to solve"
Ironically, Odells emotional response is kind of signalling a deep (subconcious) understanding of the severity of the problem that core30 introduced.
I.e. the attack vector that makes Odell fear the prospects of bip110. He just doesnt realize it and projects his anger towards luke and mechanic.
@npub1qny…95gx, honestly, lets just for arguments sake agree that luke and mechanic are attackers of bitcoin. WHO GAVE THEM THIS "CLEVER" ATTACK VECTOR.

2026-02-23 13:30:44 UTC

- reply

No that doesnt make sense. If its actually hurtful to bitcoin, then that would be a worse financial decision for their own bags than whatever investment outside of bitcoin that could motivate this approach.

2026-02-23 13:13:17 UTC

- reply

>> "based on speculation of the worst possible outcome"
It's important to remember that this is the level at which changes to bitcoin should be thought through. I saw some snippets of the RHR episode and honestly yes, @npub1qny…95gx is extremely emotional in his critique. But that aside, most of his points are probably valid. Except the "miners switching after activation" argument.
I mean. Because in that case, there would be consensus to move over - despite the transactions that would be erased. I guess consensus is literally the argument to accept rolling back those txs.
However, the point that his adversarial thinking here is justified is contradictory to core30 crowd, and especially @npub17u5…t4tp argumentation.
In another node, lopp "prepares" us that Knots crowd might ingest the blockchain with child pornography to prove their point.
Well.... if an attack vector has been introduced to bitcoin, and you helped introduced that attack vector.... then you're probably to blame if that attack vector is actually utilized. You don't really get to decide what the motive of your opponent is if they decide to perform the attack.
This became a longer note than intended, but just a TLDR to end it with:
- Odell is thinking in adversarial terms regarding bip110 which is important and arguing that it wont fix spam anyway
- but not about core30 which from my understanding doesnt fix spam at all
- lopp is being a bitch about introducing an attack vector to bitcoin
- maybe nobody should've merged a change, however small, to bitcoin core, if that change was this controversial

2026-02-22 13:01:46 UTC

- reply

Say there is bip110 consensus and no chain split, what is your concern with bip110 compared to v30?

2026-02-22 13:00:25 UTC

- reply

I see your concern regarding miners switching after activation. But what is your concern about bip 110?

2026-02-20 21:19:58 UTC

This is a message directly to all coretard and knotzies. If you fuck up my retirement savings, we're gonna have a problem.

2026-02-20 21:18:24 UTC

- reply

What are you running?

2026-02-20 10:43:58 UTC

- reply

😬

2026-02-20 09:28:48 UTC

- reply

YOOO! IM SO HONOURED 😂

2026-02-20 09:25:10 UTC

- reply

What are you running?

2026-02-18 08:53:01 UTC

- reply

Well done man. Robosats and bisq are great options.

2026-02-16 20:41:57 UTC

- reply

Stop leaking what your transaction is about. Think peer to peer. Buy more high end surround sound systems. This is the way.

2026-02-16 14:54:51 UTC

- reply

Nah nah man, easy now, ur opsec just aint tight enough. First of all which bank.

2026-02-06 11:33:06 UTC

My umbrel node has been broken for a YEAR, just because I wanted to upgrade hardware.
Previous setup was raspberry pi 4 + external SSD.
I wanted to upgrade to a pi 5 with an NVME.
SO I DID. And have been having major issues ever since. Apparently the NVME connector is shit for the (expensive) case I got and the issue was simply unstable I/O.
Finally had enough and upgraded to a lenovo thinkcentre mini.
Finally up and running again, everything is stable and I can once again rely on my own node for onchain and lightning transactions and that feeling is just epic.

2026-02-05 20:43:37 UTC

- reply

Aight, I'll buy this one.

2026-02-05 20:43:15 UTC

- reply

I've said time and time again. Either 1. He killed himself and therefore cant access his keys.
Or 2. He lost his keys and then killed himself.

2026-02-05 15:11:33 UTC

Is there a way to buy sats no-kyc without paying 30% premium? I love bisq and robosats but current offers are outrageous. Ideas??
#asknostr

2026-02-05 15:09:44 UTC

- reply

My IP address aint goin nowhere.
But yeah I know and agree with the justification for paying premium for no kyc, but north of 10% thats uncalled for people. Cmon.

2026-02-05 13:00:00 UTC

- reply

I dont know how to buy sats apparently. Robosats and bisq, all offers are 20-30-40% premium, wtf. Any advice???

2026-02-05 12:58:22 UTC

- reply

HAHA I CAME TO THE POST TO WRITE SOMETHING SIMILAR 😂😂

2026-02-04 20:31:17 UTC

- reply

Still cant fam

2026-02-04 08:47:24 UTC

- reply

Why cant I zap u homie

2026-02-03 21:10:16 UTC

- reply

I basically grew up with Kickboxer, frkn epic movie 😁

2026-02-03 20:21:56 UTC

- reply

Fucking classic

2026-02-02 15:37:16 UTC

- reply

Why not green. Im just sayin, why not a green dildo.

2026-01-31 09:53:04 UTC

- reply

Health coach looking like that, would be hilarious if you're 58 years old. Now THAT would sell 😂

2026-01-24 18:14:50 UTC

- reply

Why?

2026-01-24 18:14:04 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin has the same problem. (But for different reasons) If you have non kyc sats and want to remain private you might find some friction getting rid of your sats. However, noone will be in doubt whether your sats are real.

2026-01-20 11:57:31 UTC

- reply

The correct number of tabs to have open in your browser is zero.
#nevent1q…rv4m

2026-01-18 08:43:34 UTC

- reply

Great book recommendations

2026-01-16 13:37:24 UTC

- reply

Paolo Nutini - Iron Sky