moneyball

5 reasons miners benefit from Stratum v2:
1. Authentication and encryption. Don't let your hash rate be stolen. Even if you aren't concerned about this, your auditors and investors likely will be.
2. Less bandwidth-intensive protocol (binary vs. JSON); reduce stale shares and works better in poor internet situations
3. Ensure your pool isn't inserting transactions and not sharing out-of-band fee payments. It is becoming more topical with the increase in usage of transaction accelerators and non-standard transaction inclusion. Eliminate the requirement to have to monitor your pool.
4. Ensure you're selecting the transactions that provide the maximum fees. Don't leave it to others who may censor certain high fee transactions. Eliminate the requirement to have to monitor your pool.
5. Take charge of the bitcoin software you run and consensus rules. Don't leave it to others to determine whether or not to signal for support of a particular change or to take the risk of falling out of consensus. Eliminate the requirement to have to monitor your pool.

2024-06-04 02:31:49

- reply

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1551

2024-06-03 20:01:11

BIP 353

2024-06-03 03:51:22

- reply

Agree. Thoughts on how to make choosing a mint seamless for users ideally making it a default for them?

2024-05-29 19:45:01

- reply

Oh, well I don't think the point that LN has found product market fit as the open payment protocol has been discussed hardly at all, so I wanted to start the conversation. The fact LN is enabling nostr zaps is super cool but not in and of itself a demonstration of it being the open payment protocol. It is the emergence of Fedimint and Cashu e-cash systems that largely demonstrate that LN is becoming that as well as Ark and statechains support for LN as OPP.

2024-05-28 18:24:39

- reply

I sense from your responses that your hope is LN will offer near-zero fees while also being non-custodial with an economically viable unilateral exit. I understand it was sold this way by some folks but it isn't reality. LN's fees are a function of on-chain fees, which are going to be volatile and will continue to increase over time.
There are efforts to try and share UTXOs with more people which would allow for amortizing these costs over more people. This is awesome R&D, and I hope to see more of it. But so far, I've yet to see a design that doesn't result in some other tradeoff, such as a vastly more expensive unilateral exit or some other trust assumption.
I'm also not sure if you're understanding the point I'm trying to make. I'm saying LN has already succeeded at product market fit, but for something other than what you're imagining. I'm not saying it offers no/low fee non-custodial payments, but I am instead saying it is THE open payment protocol, connecting not only non-custodial LN wallets and custodial LN wallets but also wallets that use entirely different designs such as Fedimint, Cashu, Ark, and statechains. All of these different solutions already support LN as the open payment protocol. There's evidence that indicates LN solves that problem. Hence, product-market fit.
As for bitcoin as p2p currency, you're free to move on, but I'm going to continue working toward that as a north star. Each and every year we'll inch closer toward that, but we also shouldn't shy away from practical, useful products and designs that work today and are moving toward that north star.

2024-05-28 13:50:31

- reply

Any user of, for example, Phoenix, Mutiny, Cash App, Coinbase, a Cashu wallet, Fedi, etc. can seamlessly pay each other and not even understand each of those represents very different tradeoffs and have completely different designs. What they have in common is using bitcoin as money and LN as the open payment protocol.
If you don't like paying 0.4% fees for a non-custodial mobile LN wallet, then you have the option of using a custodial or e-cash wallet to avoid the fees along with the associated tradeoffs.
Yes, we'd all love a wallet design that supports 8B people, has no fees, is as censorship-resistant and security as on-chain bitcoin, but that doesn't exist today.

2024-05-28 03:29:44

- reply

This https://primal.net/e/note14gy37hq462t07ud60qyt0vd76kntxcthxvuem32unzl6qqq4djlsr4gx2t

2024-05-28 01:39:51

- reply

Impressive. Just the pull-ups alone!

2024-05-27 21:29:33

- reply

😂

2024-05-27 20:04:39

- reply

Yes I've used many and support many who are adopting LDK. I think Phoenix is the best UX with reasonable fees but it is no longer available to me. I like Mutiny as well and it is my preferred non-custodial LN wallet, but they've had problems with their LSP scaling. It is all very early.
Even once all the kinks are worked out, there are fundamental challenges with a LN wallet that make it impractical for small amount spending wallets (eg $20 balance) that are used to zap in nostr or on Stacker News.
There are other solutions such as e-cash that don't have that problem, but e-cash systems make other tradeoffs. Thus back to my original point, which is there's no single solution that serves everyone's payment needs. The good news is there are many solutions in the works, and LN is the open payment protocol connecting them all so users of different systems can seamlessly pay each other. It is quite beautiful.

2024-05-27 18:38:00

- reply

I'm not under a rock, and I'm sorry to break it to you, but no cryptocurrency has solved scaling. There's no silver bullet solutions. There are only tradeoffs. LN is _unique_ in that it interconnects these different solutions.
Contrast this with, say, USDC, in which there's no interoperability between the plethora of platforms that support USDC. If you have USDC on Base, try sending it to a Kraken wallet. If you have USDC on SOL in a Phantom wallet, try sending it to a Metamask user.

2024-05-27 18:35:09

- reply

Are you suggesting I don't post my thoughts on nostr? @npub180c…h6w6 seemed happy that I was posting here.

2024-05-27 18:33:36

- reply

There are various solutions all with tradeoffs. The LN interconnects all of them. https://primal.net/e/note14gy37hq462t07ud60qyt0vd76kntxcthxvuem32unzl6qqq4djlsr4gx2t

2024-05-27 16:32:58

- reply

For non-custodial LN wallets, liquidity ads and the LSP spec are liquidity management solutions (realized in code such as https://github.com/lightningdevkit/lightning-liquidity and by services such as Voltage and Olympus).
Ark and statechain-based solutions take different approaches.
Yet other solutions such as Fedimint and Cashu, or Cash App and Coinbase, because they're custodial/pooled funds, avoid those challenges altogether.

2024-05-27 15:59:10

There is yet to be a silver bullet scaling solution for cryptocurrency. Instead, what we have for now, and possibly for a long long time, are many solutions each with distinct tradeoffs that will match different user needs.
The secret sauce to making this all work is LN.
#note1an9…jy4g

2024-05-27 04:11:04

- reply

It really helped shine a light on how LN has become the open payment protocol.

2024-05-27 04:08:03

- reply

Note: I'm re-exploring such dynamics for the first time in 7 years.
Here's the distinction I'm thinking: Investors hold power because they can put their money where their mouth is. They can sell bitcoin if they don't like the direction. They can express intentions for a fork through futures like in 2017 with Bitfinex s2x futures. But investors aren't economic nodes because they aren't receiving bitcoin on a daily basis.
Economic nodes hold power because they're constantly receiving bitcoin and validating the rules. If economic nodes reject blocks mined by miners that is significant. Or, if they don't enforce new soft forked rules for transactions that miners are mining, that creates a precarious situation for anyone locking up funds in such scripts.
Thoughts?

2024-05-27 04:02:46

- reply

I made a silly typo in this note. Please refer to this one 😉 https://primal.net/e/note1an99hwm4lgpesgmvl0jn7zf55z2tamyq8vg758rgy2h4l6ydrkkseejy4g

2024-05-27 02:06:39

Bitcoin governance is fascinating. There are 4 main actors each with unique powers: miners, developers, investors, and economic nodes. For now, economic nodes are largely exchanges although this will grow in the future as payments take off (merchants, e-cash mints, LN routers).

2024-05-27 00:43:04

Lightning Network has product-market fit as the open payment protocol

2024-05-27 00:42:19

Lightning Network has product-market fit as the open monetary protocol

2024-05-11 17:37:39

"I like what Steve said, the Team Slow & Steady. Very conservative. Slow & steady development. And iterate over time." - Odell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKX6d2nPSkE&t=690s
h/t to AJ Towns for his thought leadership here https://www.erisian.com.au/wordpress/2024/04/20/team-slow-and-steady

2024-05-10 00:34:54

- reply

Physical stickers exist too!

2024-05-08 18:06:52

- reply

1.6.7

2024-05-08 17:15:53

- reply

@npub12vk…pugg on iPhone. I see it double posted too. Maybe user error but I don't think so.

2024-05-08 13:16:26

- reply

I'm curious if you learned more? Is there anything published?

2024-05-07 15:59:04

I recommend AJ's framing of slow and steady
#note1f4w…023v

2024-05-07 15:58:04

🔥
#note1nr6…ycfh

2024-05-02 20:32:34

- reply

Similar in spirit, but Ocean does not support Stratum v2 yet.

2024-05-02 20:31:49

Jack answers "“Why the hell are you all spending so much time on bitcoin?”" in Block's shareholder letter.
https://s29.q4cdn.com/628966176/files/doc_financials/2024/q1/Shareholder-Letter_1Q24_Block.pdf

2024-05-02 03:49:41

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/demand-pools-ceo-says-the-time-to-decentralize-bitcoin-mining-is-now

2024-04-28 05:23:24

- reply

If things haven't changed from a year ago then I don't think it is a practical solution as it doesn't scale and is a massive regulatory target. I do think it has several innovative technical concepts that are interesting. I've heard there are improvements to liquidity requirements though which I hope is true and would love to learn more.

2024-04-27 11:00:13

- reply

Looking forward to hearing if the unscalable liquidity requirements have been solved

2024-04-23 16:26:47

New 3nm bitcoin mining chip incoming. Let's shake up the mining industry and give Bitmain some competition! https://www.mining.build/latest-updates-3nm-system/

2024-04-17 18:15:33

Worrisome centralization
#note1qck…0jz3

2024-04-15 22:46:24

Please come tomorrow night if you're in the Bay area! https://www.meetup.com/SF-Lightning-Devs/events/300294136/

2024-03-24 23:52:35

- reply

That is not correct

2024-03-24 18:37:12

- reply

That doesn't work reliably

2024-03-23 18:10:52

- reply

Agree we want to actively monitor this and avoid it!

2024-03-23 18:05:07

- reply

Why?

2024-03-23 15:20:04

- reply

That's still the vision? What does your disappointment stem from?

2024-03-21 23:24:36

Reference implementation of Stratum v2 is ready for use! https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/stratum-reference-implementation-launches-sri-1-0-0-to-enhance-bitcoin-mining

2024-03-20 13:03:17

Really compelling use of nostr. Anyone can add an opinion now.
#note1pxe…w77j

2024-03-19 18:25:30

- reply

LN makes it seamless to pay anyone no matter what other system their using (Cash App, Kraken, another cashu mint, a Fedimint, a statechain, an Ark wallet, etc.). LN is the open monetary network.

2024-03-19 18:22:33

- reply

I also haven't had the experience you're having Hong when using cashu.

2024-03-19 17:43:19

I sat down with @npub1hxw…40pf last week to discuss a variety of bitcoin topics. Check it out! https://open.spotify.com/episode/26jcUMcb7g2NSpYuOy64yx

2024-03-13 23:19:56

Should be a good one. What do you want to hear from us?
#note1x95…u3lc

2024-03-13 20:57:46

- reply

Hard to take you seriously Tony.

2024-03-13 20:57:25

- reply

That is an absurd and disrespectful take.

2024-03-13 14:44:30

- reply

Not your wallet keys but a different set of keys. See the Social Recovery section https://bitkey.build/content/files/2023/11/Bitkey-Recovery-Features.pdf

2024-02-29 03:26:34

This is such great analysis of non-standard transactions mined on bitcoin by @0xB10C https://b10c.me/observations/09-non-standard-transactions/

2024-02-24 23:56:49

- reply

I thought you might like that ;-)

2024-02-24 23:00:02

Let's discuss GCC https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2019/03/05/#cleanup-soft-fork-proposal

2024-02-11 04:34:19

Fantastic work by Matt!
#note1z6c…rp4d

2024-01-24 07:00:40

- reply

I'm grateful for Bitcoin Core developers

2024-01-19 19:33:08

- reply

❤️

2023-12-21 03:47:53

- reply

https://primal.net/e/note1uf6vlr5xgek20xe0qennetghqxtkc885vpamxhq8sk2eptxj9wzs3600xw

2023-12-19 04:26:01

- reply

Based on early feedback, allow me to clarify. I'm not suggesting redefining open source. A better way to frame it is open source best practices.

2023-12-19 03:53:48

- reply

9. Public good mindset. Does the project's culture allow it to shift from what might initially start as a company project to ultimately a public good?

2023-12-19 03:53:30

- reply

7. Self-sufficient funding. Does the core team proactively seek external funding sources for development of the project so that the project can survive even if the founding entity abandons it?

2023-12-19 03:53:21

- reply

6. Recruiting external contributors. Does the core team embrace and champion new contributors who aren't affiliated with the core team's organization?

2023-12-19 03:53:12

- reply

5. Supporting external contribution. Does the core team prioritize and review external contributors PRs?

2023-12-19 03:53:03

- reply

4. General vs. specific design. Did the team that created the software design it with only their specific application in mind? Or did they design it general enough to accommodate many types of future users?

2023-12-19 03:52:52

- reply

3. Working in the open. That is, does a team work for months or years in private only to publish code for major releases? Or are issues and PRs in a public tracker with public discussion on a daily basis?

2023-12-19 03:52:42

- reply

2. Permissive license. Does the license restrict commercial use or is it free open source like MIT License?

2023-12-19 03:52:32

- reply

1. Source available. This one is straight forward.

2023-12-19 02:50:16

- reply

I'm chatting with them tomorrow. What should I ask?

2023-12-08 07:49:52

- reply

What about this one? https://primal.net/e/note1rpcet3l35zgvqplyujxx32nlcjrzkl9awqrvgn2dn7f0r8e5ghhq6uqfc4

2023-12-07 15:26:36

You can now pre-order Bitkey! Consider it as a holiday gift for friends and loved ones who want to get their bitcoin off exchanges but are scared to self custody. #note1l7f…y0ry

2023-11-30 01:52:36

Detailed 22 pager on Bitkey's recovery. Highly recommended read for anyone who nerds out on self-custody. https://bitkey.build/sharing-our-recovery-design/

2023-11-30 01:47:43

https://twitter.com/bunniestudios/status/1721537517776974044

2023-11-28 22:37:52

- reply

More performant and reliable than Tor and much cheaper than a generalized VPN service. Hopefully will just be baked into bitcoin wallets.

2023-11-28 22:14:40

More attention should be paid to OHTTP in the bitcoin space

2023-11-24 21:07:05

- reply

2024 will be the year of BOLT 12

2023-11-24 21:03:09

- reply

Spiral's work too

2023-11-10 02:40:07

#note1emn…mqwx
That's one big screen

2023-10-19 19:22:20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJiK4d5sy6Y

2023-09-28 04:19:34

- reply

We need more chip makers and to open up these systems more.

2023-06-29 00:37:02

- reply

Where are you imagining running VLS?

2023-06-13 05:33:49

- reply

Would love to see analysis of how bad it is relative to LN flood and loot https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08513

2023-06-13 05:27:57

- reply

When will exchanges support bech32m? Until then it is risky for a wallet to be taproot-only. https://whentaproot.org/

2023-06-13 05:26:07

- reply

Can you elaborate?

2023-06-12 02:40:55

- reply

As long as you're confident a quorum of signers properly delete old shares then you're good. For example, someone could steal one device in a 2of3 and the other 2 signers you control can generate a new set of 3 shares and properly delete their two shares. The thief's share is pointless then.

2023-06-10 13:28:41

- reply

Wow!

2023-06-05 03:31:24

- reply

Yup you just have to be sure the old shares are properly deleted

2023-05-10 14:04:03

- reply

There are examples of doing this though such as limiting the size of OP_RETURN, the introduction of standard transactions on Core as a forwarding policy, limiting the depth of child/parent transactions, limiting the size of a transaction, etc. Do you consider all of these a different category?
(I'm not suggesting we "do something" but I'm just exploring whether it is a reasonable discussion or not.)

2023-04-29 15:55:21

- reply

Yikes. We're learning over here.

2023-04-26 06:54:46

- reply

Wait until I create an NFT inscription of it

2023-04-17 23:12:45

- reply

Are you referring to their propriety 2FA (which I would agree) or their TOTP support? If the latter, can you elaborate?