fak

Public Key

npub1hd9w807v54pyev83czpyvqc3yrzz944u30ges9gxclzwrh23fgwqxtkdtc

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqstkjhrhlx22sjvkrcupqjxqvgjp3pz667gh5vcz5rv038pm4g558qpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds98akem

Publishing to

nostr.wine

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1hd9w807v54pyev83czpyvqc3yrzz944u30ges9gxclzwrh23fgwqxtkdtc

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-04-12 19:39:40 UTC

Ah, the runners I follow on youtube have gone back to all releasing their videos on Sunday evening. Things are going to get squeaky as I double-speed some of them.

2026-04-06 06:40:30 UTC

- reply

as someone who has a blue badge, maybe you could comment as to whether you have been unable to access an accessible space because they are all full. Because that would seem to me to be the biggest issue for holders of the badge. The money element (congestion charges & parking fees) is a side issue to people who need those spaces being able to access them, and I don't much care about the money aspect (though obviously councils would).

2026-03-31 12:09:15 UTC

Another speedwork session out on the railway path. 8 reps of 600m, ranging from 2:18 to 2:21 per rep. Nice and consistent, 10 miles total. #RunnersOfMastodon
https://static.toot.community/media_attachments/files/116/323/704/236/404/248/original/1d3bc683f124ae43.jpeg

2026-03-22 13:11:50 UTC

Ugh, god-botherers door-knocking on the street again. Will they respect my sign asking them not to interrupt my day?

2025-12-28 18:31:22 UTC

- reply

it also physically weakens women. The level of extreme starvation required by people not genetically thin in order to achieve the look damages their bones as well as their internal organs.
Add in the mental toll, and not only does your brain run on carbs, but eating disorders have the highest mortality rate of all mental illnesses.

2025-12-12 18:34:20 UTC

- reply

so the general population of the UK is just under 70 million, of which just under 1 million are members of a political party.

2025-09-12 08:04:54 UTC

- reply

As much as I hate The Mirror, they even ran a story about it when Mandy was announced as US Ambassador https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-abuse-victims-fury-34352597

2025-09-12 08:02:10 UTC

I knew I'd heard of the Mandelson-Epstein connection a while ago. A news story from 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/peter-mandelson-jeffrey-epstein-photo-picture-prince-andrew-death-latest-a9086361.html It's not plausible for Labour not to have known.

2025-04-16 10:43:57 UTC

- reply

I don't need to know if you are trans or cis. I need to know how you want to be referred to (name and pronouns) and that's it.
It's not that hard, let people live their lives being true to themselves. If someone oversteps into harassment, assault, discrimination - then that is what you address, the behaviour.
Not that long ago I thought the world was moving forwards, but bigots keep trying to drag us backwards. They are wrong and they are not going to win long-term.

2025-04-16 10:34:37 UTC

- reply

against misogynistic discrimination just the same as cis women. If you are being discriminated against because you are being perceived as female (or vice versa), the law shouldn't care whether or not the medical profession present at your birth put you in box A or box B. The Equality Act used to be explicit about that. Following this ruling I am not so sure it will be. This allows people to discriminate because they want to, it fixes no existing problems and only causes more.

2025-04-16 10:31:00 UTC

- reply

Discrimination is always based on perceived gender - people don't know what was put on your first birth certificate when they decide to discriminate based on gender. It's always been perceived gender (including being outside a gender binary). Trans people also get additional discrimination for being trans (just as with race), but it all starts with gender (which is socially constructed, just like race) and that should be reflected in the law. Not this bullshit. Trans women should be protected

2025-04-16 10:27:28 UTC

- reply

It's completely unenforceable. This ruling has decided that sex = biological sex = sex assigned at birth = what is on your birth certificate. Except birth certificates can be changed, so what sort of proof will be accepted if you want to claim discrimination as a result of your sex? What sort of proof will be accepted to access spaces? There is none. They might try and prevent birth certificates from being changed (too late, btw) and then everyone has to carry one? Screw sex, stick to gender.

2025-04-16 10:08:41 UTC

- reply

"There is going to be an ongoing fight," she says.
"Now we have a really concrete basis for going forward."
Time to change the law to explicitly include trans women, trans men, intersex and non binary people so that nobody can be discriminated against, and everyone gets access to getting their needs met (healthcare, housing, employment, etc.)
#TransRightsAreHumanRights

2025-04-16 10:06:11 UTC

This is what every woman, intersex and non-binary person was worried about with this case. While the judgment might attempt to restrict this 'woman = AFAB' definition to the reading of the Equality Act (which is bad enough) hate groups such as Women For Scotland and Sex Matters are going to use this ruling to try and push such a restrictive and exclusionary definition across all forms of legislation https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t?post=asset%3A20bf2e47-c0fa-4878-bf66-2534245e475c#post all because of their transphobia towards trans women being on boards.

2025-02-14 20:53:50 UTC

I am going to be able to delete so many emails from my inbox in a few weeks' time, but the latest one to arrive is the big one: confirmation of how to claim my six-star medal if/when I complete Tokyo marathon in just over 15 days. I didn't get their invite to the special breakfast (I wouldn't have gone anyway) so it's a relief to know I am definitely properly on their list. The mantra remains: don't get injured, don't get ill. #running #sixstar #worldmarathonmajors #tokyomarathon2025

2024-11-26 13:57:14 UTC

- reply

criminal damage doesn't require intent in the UK, recklessness is sufficient. If that tractor had red diesel in it (which attracts a lower level of fuel duty) there's a good chance that's another offence as it cannot be used by vehicles on public roads except in very limited circumstances.

2024-11-23 13:28:02 UTC

- reply

I'd argue that at the household level 'no magic money tree' is still accurate, and age appropriate for kids to learn about budgeting. Learning about government-level finances and how they differ to household level would be more appropriate for GCSE economics courses. At that age kids might be looking for part-time employment and would be advised to have a good foundation in personal budgeting already.

2024-11-23 12:14:05 UTC

- reply

children can be taught what a budget is and that there is no magic money tree and bottomless pit that parents can draw from, without necessarily causing them worry over household finances. As they get older then can learn about financing, how to evaluate a 'good' deal, APRs and all that. But the basics are very simple: you have £2 to spend in a charity shop/ you get £1 a week pocket money/ you received £10 in book tokens/vouchers, what can you buy?

2024-11-23 12:10:45 UTC

- reply

as soon as a child gets pocket money, they are introduced to budgeting. How many sweets/toys can you buy with it? How many weeks would you need to save in order to buy Y thing? I think I had a bank account from the age of 4. I don't recall any particular loss of innocence as a result. As always, any topic needs to be taught in an age appropriate manner. A budget can be set on shopping trips for example without losing innocence, I think. Cont...

2024-10-10 17:38:38 UTC

- reply

your car's MOT includes a mileage report. Super easy to monitor, and the cost can be charged right then and there (before your MOT certificate can be released and recorded in the system). It's something anyone can check at any time, so no surprises. Obviously something would need to be in place when selling/buying second hand, but it would be a massively low admin way of charging per mile for any car that is of MOT age.

2024-09-29 13:01:55 UTC

- reply

I can guarantee that businesses are being harder hit by increasing energy prices, than they are by statutory maternity pay.

2024-09-29 12:47:56 UTC

- reply

employers can reclaim 92% of statutory maternity pay from the government. In some cases they can reclaim 103%. If a business can't afford 8% of statutory maternity pay, they've got bigger problems. The amount based on 90% of salary only last for 6 weeks, after that it's the lower of 90% and £184.03 a week. Your business can't afford £14.72 a week?

2024-09-26 17:15:06 UTC

- reply

I worked with non-doms. They don't come to the UK for the tax status, and they don't stay or leave for the tax status. It might factor into their decisions to come in the first place, but there's a reason not everyone lives in places like Dubai. Remuneration packages might be renegotiated to account for it, there are plenty of other (currently) legal options (such as tax treaties and trusts) to minimise effects.

2024-08-03 01:26:00 UTC

- reply

my GCSE French isn't up to trawling through French tax sites and news reports though. The tax guide would seem to indicate that something has been put in place for athletes to be able to claim a rebate for any monies caught covering 2023-2025 that isn't exempted under existing tax treaties https://olympics.com/en/paris-2024/information/tax-guide

2024-08-03 01:17:03 UTC

- reply

I remembered that there was something about athletes choosing not to play at Queen's because of the tax bill and found https://www.saffery.com/insights/articles/overseas-athletes-and-uk-income-tax/ which would suggest that the IOC does seek to make an exemption from tax for the athletes a condition of the bidding process for the Olympics. Certainly exemptions were put in place for 2012 (and have been repeated for other events) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11981604

2024-08-02 17:27:37 UTC

- reply

I never worked for any during an Olympic cycle, but I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't something done. It must be something that comes up for various competitions such as the Diamond League's, so would expect sponsorship deals to be structured to be tax efficient (at least for/by the top earners).

2024-08-02 16:56:13 UTC

- reply

will it matter that they are under strict blackout rules whilst at the Olympics, not able to post about their own sponsors (though their sponsors can post about them)? The Olympics strictly regulates which sponsors are allowed to get airtime, even on individual participants' social media.