linux

https://liberdon.com/@linux

Public Key

npub16t3sk5y46mf2r7ulk836649c8hj0f3e4k6w5sq3mqxtfw2rdf6rq8uen6q

NIP-05 Address

linux_at_liberdon.com@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsd9cct2z2ad54plw0mrcad2jurme85cu6md82gqgasr95h9pk5apsprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmntdcns0s

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

Author Public Key

npub16t3sk5y46mf2r7ulk836649c8hj0f3e4k6w5sq3mqxtfw2rdf6rq8uen6q

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-10-05 13:57:33 UTC

- reply

Did he even notice that this is a camera with lenses and a tripod?
His response makes it look like he thought this was a gun. It's not.

2025-09-20 04:07:55 UTC

- reply

Hey maybe just stupidly hurling insults will make people forget how desperately and pathetically you're evading a simple request to show the receipts of the accusations you're making!
Try it! Chant harder, bitch! Chant furiously and insistently, instead of simply supporting your assertions with screenshots and links to back your accusations!
Come on; chant that line about "trash" and insult me instead of showing your receipts!

2025-09-20 03:54:03 UTC

- reply

why do you stupidly think that chanting over and over that you think Bitcoin is "trash" makes BCH even more trashy, because nobody will use it?
When is the hard-fork scam-coin BCH going to process 10 million transactions per day, @npub1erp…s9c5 ? By what date, and how much are you wagering? When will anyone want to use it for anything other than communicating to Craight Wright and Roger Ver that you want to birth their children out of your butthole?

2025-09-20 03:47:07 UTC

- reply

On https://learnmeabitcoin.com/beginners/guide/segwit/ , we read, "Just because the block size changed from 1,000,000 bytes to 4,000,000 weight units, it does not make SegWit an absolute block size increase to 4 MB."
What does it say is the reason, and what actual *block size* (not weight) does it say we should expect?
@npub1erp…s9c5 cannot and will never answer this, because he's a scamming liar, exactly like Roger Ver and Craig Wright!

2025-09-20 01:00:58 UTC

- reply

Which Segwit developer told you it would give 4 MB block sizes? C'mon, you stupid pathetic bitch! Show us your receipts! Show us your links and screenshots. Who told you that stupid, obvious lie that you were too retarded to fact-check before you repeated it?

2025-09-19 13:47:32 UTC

- reply

Yet another prediction with no date and no wager.
That's how you can tell this is regurgitation of cult brainwashing program, and not a serious analysis.
Hard forks must be centrally directed, by a single controlling entity. Bitcoin has never hard-forked; BCH has hard-forked several times.
@npub1erp…s9c5 is projecting his cult's failures onto those he cannot control, out of pure spite and rage.

2025-09-19 04:09:24 UTC

- reply

I helped write the debunking of that fake video by scammer Roger Ver.
Remember: he was completely incapable of writing any code that any node operator wanted to run. He has no merit by which to achieve a position of leadership in a meritocracy.
I once reduced him to a spittle-flinging slobbery rage puddle, when he said that segwit didn't increase the block size, by showing him a post-segwit block on a block explorer and asking him how big it was.
He's an ourageous fucking liar.

2025-09-19 03:47:29 UTC

- reply

Roger Ver and Craig tried to destroy Bitcoin but the straight-laced Bitcoin community did not let them so they had to fork off.
Hardforks are not upgrades to a cryptocurrency; they are the cessation of one chain and ruleset and creation of a new, different, incompatible chain and ruleset. Anyone who tells you "hardforks are the proper way to upgrade a cryptocurrency" is directly quoting Craig Wright, and is a fucking scammer exactly as Craig Wright is.

2025-08-22 11:49:33 UTC

- reply

#Nextcloud 25 is already obsoleted and unsupported. Look, you can see where it was released a long time ago, at https://github.com/nextcloud/server/releases/tag/v25.0.0 .
At this point, it isn't just a good suggestion not to reuse already-obsolete version numbers for new versions of Nextcloud software. This is such an egregiously-stupid idea that your whole community believes you should fire, block, and ban the person who made the decision to do this. They're actively attempting to destroy your product from within.

2025-06-29 21:46:12 UTC

- reply

I just did this recently, but I simply used Audacity and selected the timeframes to export as .wav files (subsequently compressed as .flacs). I put no effort into automating that workflow, because records will always have tiny pops and crackles that make it more fruitful to rip CDs whenever they're available instead.

2025-03-17 21:18:43 UTC

- reply

What even was the name of the guy the big-Ls put on the ballot? Chase Oliver or something like that? The guy known for doing absolutely nothing, leading nothing successfully, serving no role in governance, winning no previous elections for anything?
If you were excited about that dude, I'd probably roll my eyes in distaste. But it sounds like you're feeling how many of us are: incrementalists, hoping Trump's and Musk's wild chainsaw swings occasionally nick the right targets.

2025-03-17 21:14:02 UTC

- reply

Thomas Sowell famously answered a question about his political alignment by saying he was, in principle, fairly libertarian but for pragmatism, he voted Republican.
For a lot of right-libertarians, it's an improvement over the existing options to have a Republican president who shuts the hell up about abortion and gay marriage, and actually takes (even a tiny handful of) concrete actions to cut spending anywhere.
Not ideologically pure, true. Better than the options, also true.

2025-03-09 15:40:12 UTC

- reply

@npub14kx…urew
I already answered this. I showed you the link that defines the four freedoms that define "free software," which, once again, is here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#four-freedoms
Then I explained further: "the license for Bookwyrm doesn't even meet the first characteristic of software freedom ("freedom 0")."
Please actually *read* what I write when I explain to you what is wrong with Bookwyrm and why it is not free software. Then, stop spreading your #fakenews .

2025-03-09 15:18:05 UTC

- reply

Please, no fakenews: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#four-freedoms
If you had read your own link, you would see that the license for Bookwyrm doesn't even meet the first characteristic of software freedom ("freedom 0"). But apparently you weren't even able to click on the license on the webpage you linked yourself, so you just told a blatant lie.
Never, ever falsely accuse others of spreading #fakenews while you do it yourself. That is malicious cult behavior, and it makes you a horrible person.

2025-03-09 09:30:36 UTC

- reply

Bookwyrm is not free and open source software (FOSS), so it's not a good idea to welcome it to the fediverse. It's a far better idea to support #NeoDB instead, which *is* FOSS and has far more features anyway.