Fully agree! It's more harmful on contributors and maintainers to let in AI contributions and take the discussion after on a per-contribution basis. We need the rules to be clear from the beginning.
Can people "cheat" and make AI contributions so precise, well-tested and minimal and *easy to maintain* that maintainers will think it's a genuine human contribution? I would worry about it when it happens. If people do this without declaration, they're on the wrong side of the line, anyway.
Benjamin Balder Bach
npub1vv…wpuhp
2025-12-17 10:04:55 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…9u90
Author Public Key
npub1vvjjcd5dt3awuk3qd4m4ds5hrxq8c0459zdsrcgp5gysyvapc2kqqwpuhpSeen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2025-12-17 10:04:55 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "25bd92952cb9316a4b33b76676a5107d70ae3ace1ab6e0f593dd1bab2aec9a95",
"pubkey": "63252c368d5c7aee5a206d7756c29719807c3eb4289b01e101a2090233a1c2ac",
"created_at": 1765965895,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"53d1bbb8b04c54b5f777e925782cb6a50edb3a77287f59b1d606fbeaea292177"
],
[
"p",
"9792df7edfcd7c23c871af8275f935bffcbcd25ea6afb578c46007f2b6b24a96"
],
[
"e",
"6650a9e735b0879cf1e2bc980fa511294d874e548f400ea099478a6a2b38f11f",
"",
"reply",
"9792df7edfcd7c23c871af8275f935bffcbcd25ea6afb578c46007f2b6b24a96"
],
[
"p",
"da613814f1fb40b482aabe8c978afcefe1d5c4dfbcd95f3dd529416156b16ab6"
],
[
"p",
"63252c368d5c7aee5a206d7756c29719807c3eb4289b01e101a2090233a1c2ac"
],
[
"e",
"a48f9447c46839ca9c28d9d5c9ba7b3d3e5431937e7bc095aae43692544d86f1",
"",
"root",
"9792df7edfcd7c23c871af8275f935bffcbcd25ea6afb578c46007f2b6b24a96"
],
[
"p",
"dc8d04c9e060396afd13fc849243eca6dc016455aedb2394a57c381c09b800d2"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.data.coop/@benjaoming/115734340940090811",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.data.coop/users/benjaoming/statuses/115734340940090811",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://social.data.coop/users/benjaoming/statuses/115734340940090811",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Fully agree! It's more harmful on contributors and maintainers to let in AI contributions and take the discussion after on a per-contribution basis. We need the rules to be clear from the beginning.\n\nCan people \"cheat\" and make AI contributions so precise, well-tested and minimal and *easy to maintain* that maintainers will think it's a genuine human contribution? I would worry about it when it happens. If people do this without declaration, they're on the wrong side of the line, anyway.",
"sig": "aeebffea70b949382deae24241612684a25853bd96907fe9c0ce708214adf37bcbaa6347cb499f16f6d2c7365c1b6d2184cefb35b16db85a53cbdaf4ec764516"
}