Taylan (GNU+Feminism Cat)

#fedi22 #FreeSoftware #Programming #ProgrammingLanguages #Scheme #Emacs #Politics #Ethics #Philosophy #Feminism

Public Key

npub1uzcsm7540llpxa2mk3ajkcz8r62sghjkveqjvnq2xcykhfuxfxtq77hsyy

NIP-05 Address

taylan@fedi-feministwiki-org.mostr.pub

Profile Code

nprofile1qqswpvgdl22hllsnw4dmg7etvpr3a9gytetxvsfxfs9rvztt57ryn9spz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43q649wdn

Publishing to

relay.ditto.pub

Author Public Key

npub1uzcsm7540llpxa2mk3ajkcz8r62sghjkveqjvnq2xcykhfuxfxtq77hsyy

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-05-07 12:48:49 UTC

"What's the EU planning now??" "Sex only with consent."
uhhhhhh what?
Seriously though, that's the title of this video, translated:
> Sex only with Consent: That's the EU's plan. | Why? | ARTE Info
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/84/3d/22/843d2243823488fca4c3a0cfa182989a177a5c725173bbd3bcd8b22bf7271838.webp

2026-04-29 12:02:11 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…z57y
I think @nprofile…mfuj probably exaggerated quite a bit by calling them "technofascist" but a ton of "FOSS" dev happens at RedHat these days, which is a subsidiary of IBM, who probably care about little more than profit and will gladly bend the knee to administrations like that of Trump.
There was also something about Nix/NixOS being involved with Palantir and Anduril or something. And that was shortly after they did a so-called "nazi purge" of their community, which meant banning lots of normal people. (I'd imagine there was probably not a single actual nazi.) But I haven't followed that drama very closely and don't know what the situation with Nix is now.

2026-03-30 01:35:07 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…r9u2 @nprofile…ffp8
Lunduke's interpretation that this may simply be Meta wanting to shift the responsibility to other companies makes sense. Unlike Apple and Google, Meta doesn't develop an OS, nor does it have an app store, so their lobbyists pushing for a law that's purely concerned with OS and app store stuff makes perfect sense for Meta: It ensures they have to do *nothing* in response to this law. That's basically the best case scenario for a company in terms of the result of their lobbying efforts. The new law makes literally no difference to them.
In the second half of the video, he points out that some larger tech industry coalitions, including Google, also started supporting such laws, but mainly through some organization about "social progress" and I see no plausible theory about there being anything nefarious behind this like wanting to be able to do more effective data harvesting.
One also has to ask why these companies would care at all if this is about some nefarious government plot to implement surveillance. I just don't see the panicked arguments in opposition to this law culminating into any kind of coherent theory about some nefarious intent on behalf of any party involved, government or corpo.
What I see happening is a bipartisan push for restricting children's access to various online content, because it's been running rampant for ages and more and more people are constantly talking about it (see also: social media bans for children) and so the companies are sending in their lobbyists to ensure that whatever laws get passed don't bother them too much.

2026-03-29 22:01:41 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…ffp8 @nprofile…r9u2
What evidence is there that this law was pushed for by Meta? It seems more likely that lawmakers were going to decide on one or another law to this effect either way, because there was bipartisan support for this, and tech industry lobbyists got involved in the discussion because that's always how it goes in American politics. Their job is to ensure that new laws don't create too big of an issue for the corporations they work for.

2026-03-28 04:39:11 UTC

So the "age verification" law that everyone is freaking out over just says an OS must offer an interface for specifying the age of a user? And offer a way for applications to check it?
https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB1043/id/3269704
No third party verification of any kind? What even is the problem? THIS IS GOOD.
This is almost exactly how I thought it should be:
1. Adult owner of computer specifies that user account "Timmy" is for a person born in 2016.
2. The OS offers applications a means of asking whether the current user is age X or older.
3. Websites meant for age X and over must send some signal to specify this, such as with an HTTP response header.
4. The web client application (e.g. Firefox) must react to this signal from websites and perform the age check using the OS mechanism mentioned in step 2.
When Timmy goes to adultsite.com, Firefox receives the header "User-Age-Check: 18" and asks the OS if Timmy is 18 or older. The OS says no, so Firefox stops loading the site and shows an error.
The law basically specifies points 1 and 2, just going into unnecessary detail about "age bracket" stuff. (Realistically, an OS would just offer a generic "age ≥ X" check so it can support any age brackets of any jurisdiction.)
This is a step in the right direction.

2026-03-25 17:46:35 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…rm88 @nprofile…dgnf @nprofile…s24j @nprofile…d73q
"Villain arc" be like:
> Cleanly and thoroughly explains the problem, in a frustrated tone, without insulting or flaming anyone, at most responding with sarcasm to bad faith responses and personal insults...
If you think that makes me a villain, you must have a very sheltered life and never had to deal with an actually unpleasant person. :blobcat-joy:

2026-03-25 15:18:45 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…d73q @nprofile…s24j @nprofile…dgnf
My experience has proven this to be false.

2026-03-25 15:01:59 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…d73q @nprofile…s24j @nprofile…dgnf
You are always free to mute or block me. Just ask yourself whether you aren't just proving my original point, which is that CoCs and people who ardently defend them carry with them a culture of toxicity and exclusion, thus harming Free Software.

2026-03-25 14:58:32 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…d73q @nprofile…s24j @nprofile…dgnf
That's fine! People who happen to come across our interactions can observe this, and make up their mind about which side seems more genuine and willing to provide reasonable arguments.

2026-03-25 14:55:08 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…d73q @nprofile…s24j @nprofile…dgnf
My point is that your arguments are structurally similar to arguments against Free Software, in that they're based on memetic repetition of dogmatic claims without substance.
> Your so called "gender critical views" is hate speech disguised as a legitimate viewpoint.
> A TERF saying shit like "We need to protect women" is equivalent to a corpo saying "We need to verify your age to protect your children". Everyone outside your movement knows that.
These claims, for example, are just like a proprietary shill repeating memes like: "The GPL is just a freedom limiting license that spreads like cancer by forcing others to use it as well. If you REALLY supported freedom, you'd use a BSD or MIT style license. Everyone who's not a GNUtard knows this."
These claims are so hollow, so devoid of actual substantive arguments, that it doesn't even motivate me to type a serious response.

2026-03-25 14:39:15 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…d73q @nprofile…s24j @nprofile…dgnf
My pro-Feminism and Gender Critical opinions are objectively right, just like my Free Software opinions. :blobcat-nod:
You on the other hand are like the people who call the GPL a "virus" and accuse the FSF of being "paranoid" or "overly zealous" because they don't have actual counter-arguments.
Using phrases like "TERF bullshit" to mock Gender Critical views is like proprietary shills using phrases like "muh freedumbs" to mock Free Software. Memetic responses to correct opinions.

2026-03-25 14:29:59 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…d73q @nprofile…s24j @nprofile…dgnf
> Arguing on a SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MAILING LIST about the definition of "sex" and "gender" is not human rights.
No, it isn't. Neither did I say it is. You told me to "drop the stupid feminism crap" and women's rights are human rights.
I also didn't argue about the definition of sex and gender on any software mailing list, by the way. Like I said in my initial message in this thread, you always come up with these weird claims about things I didn't do. :blobcat-laugh:
> feminazi
Whoa, calm down sexist boy.
> You live in a bubble and can't interact with the rest of the world.
I interact with the rest of the world just fine. I run a large open project where everyone is welcome and we cozily collaborate with all kinds of people. (We don't use a toxic CoC so it's genuinely welcoming to everyone.) Other than that, I play multiplayer online games, I shitpost on fedi for fun, I argue with you, I chat with my girlfriend, play with my cats, touch grass and exercise in our backyard, watch TV shows with family members, and so on and so forth. :blobcat-hearts:
> More than you would think. And I'm actively working on fixing that.
Good luck, LOL. By throwing around words like "feminazi" and insulting anyone who doesn't agree with your view on gender identity, you're already excluding like 90% of humanity from wanting to be your friend. Of those who remain, very few will ever care about genuine software freedom, FSF-style.
The Free Software crusade against proprietary software is, realistically, no more hopeful than the Gender Critical crusade against oppressive gender identity ideology. In fact, the latter may actually be more hopeful and realistic, I'm not sure. In any case, it's really ironic when you say "nobody cares about that so give up!"

2026-03-25 14:07:11 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…d73q @nprofile…s24j @nprofile…dgnf
I'll still be telling the story 20 years from now if CoCs come up.
And no I'm not going to stop caring about human rights. What a stupid thing to ask of someone.
In my own bubble I have no problem being taken seriously. How many people outside of your Free Software bubble take you seriously when you tell people using proprietary software is evil? Most people don't even know what that means and think "free software" refers to freeware, LOL. Appeal to popularity is not very smart.

2026-03-25 13:49:38 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…d73q @nprofile…s24j @nprofile…dgnf
I was an enthusiastic contributor to multiple free software projects, like #guix, until all the #CoC crap and the culture associated with it made me begin to despise communities that previously felt like home. Because they began feeling toxic, oppressive, and exclusionary.
I've told you this multiple times, but every time I bring it up, you decide that it must have been my fault, and start to throw accusations at me.
Every time, I ask you for evidence of my wrongdoings that you accuse me of, pointing you at mailing list archives that you could cite for evidence if there were any, and every time you then just start trolling and hurling insults.
Because the accusations are either blatant misrepresentations that would be exposed if you cited the origin, or are made up entirely. (I'm not even sure you're aware of that. Maybe you just repeat hearsay without bothering to scrutinize it.)
I was even mildly supportive of CoCs until I've had these horrible experiences. The whole drama in guix for example was sparked by a suggestion I made to improve their CoC. Hilarious now that I think about it.
It's time to accept that CoCs are useless *at best* and that there's mounting evidence that they're actively harmful, due to an overall toxic culture they carry, and widespread public dislike of them.

2026-03-22 18:25:31 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…la83 That looks healthier than being overweight. Doesn't look anything close to being dangerously thin.

2026-03-10 15:25:59 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…e0xm God damn it. I want chickens now.

2026-03-03 20:14:50 UTC

WTF I just realised that "eyvah" (which we say in Turkish to mean "oh no") is basically just "oy vey" in Arabic. Like, I think it's probably the same roots??
Just like "oh wei" in German, probably.

2026-02-24 03:06:09 UTC

Just learned about Justapedia, launched as a Wikipedia fork of sorts, due to political bias on Wikipedia.
https://justapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tj00TeWzpHw

2026-02-22 17:35:22 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…xsvf
By the way, it seems most of these speech crimes of him were committed on Facebook.
They're ordering him to pay 750K for boomer posting on Facebook, mostly.
"Appendix A: Mr. Neufeld's publications" starts on page 133.
A few of the examples seem to be from school meetings or such, in which he seems to have expressed himself politely.
Total free speech death.

2026-02-22 17:13:11 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…xsvf
Teacher ordered to pay 750K for "hate speech" that's basically just him expressing his opinions.
Someone on the pro trans side pointed to the first three screenshots here (from pages 28, 31, 63) as "evidence" that he deserves it, so I assume this is the worst of what he said.
The ruling also includes a passage that implies that saying you don't believe in gender identity is automatically illegal discrimination. See last screenshot from pages 18/19.
https://www.bctf.ca/docs/default-source/for-news-and-stories/49_chilliwack_teachers-_association_v_neufeld_no_10_2026_bchrt_49.pdf
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/ed/00/5b/ed005b5f7a38fcb0f975496992cdf82654439788efb5718ee34dab4a35d5deb4.jpg
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/6c/e4/6b/6ce46b95c384655165d1f68feafeca47742bdec961979532f329d5de2c0f615e.jpg
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/5c/4f/f4/5c4ff4e51dff1f01a00d9dbd4e1dec145c40327d52dbbff032553f7d18c51cdb.jpg
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/ef/12/e9/ef12e975c088b3d1ba61892506e3525c786ee783fac4e3c39d0d60915ae1e22a.jpg

2026-02-22 04:38:43 UTC

@nprofile…xsvf You're Canadian, right? Heard about the gender identity ruling by the human rights tribunal?

2026-02-21 19:18:32 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…fwa4 @nprofile…e0xm
Hmm, not sure I'd agree they've regressed to a state *worse* than the 50s, but otherwise agree.
Unrelated side-note: Your post didn't appear in my notifications despite it being a reply to me and despite me following your account. :blobcat-thinking: Maybe mostr.pub is lagging with sending out notifications, or maybe it's a problem with my Pleroma instance since your post did actually appear in my timeline. Dunno.

2026-02-21 16:53:28 UTC

Really liked this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZ4ISpGmdyg
Mr. Menno (a fab gay man) investigates the absurd claims about JK Rowling having been a friend of Epstein, and the claims about Epstein having had something to do with transgender activism or "pushing transgenderism" as some call it. Both are false. There is zero evidence that Epstein had anything to do with JK Rowling, or pro-trans activism, or anti-trans activism.
"Always love facts & reality more than you hate your enemies." Amen to that. :blobcat-joy:

2026-02-21 15:53:50 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…e0xm Wow this article manages to be the complete antithesis of everything I believe. :blobcat-extremejoy:
Basic liberal principles that became widespread in the 20th century are good, actually. Using "woke" to describe *any* left/liberal/progressive ideology is silly, and indeed the only problem is the dogmatism and tribalism and misapplication of the principles, not the principles themselves, which served society well until around 2010. That's also why "woke right" is a valid description as well, that can be used for right-wing dogmatic identity politics like "white men are being oppressed by evil feminists/Jews/gays in power and are the source of all evil" which is just woke left turned upside down.

2026-02-21 03:53:50 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…le0y @nprofile…z57y
Taking a quick look at the links in your blog post that are supposed to prove him to be a bad person, all I see is fairly normal political opinions that I'd say about half of society shares. Opinions that are considered "right wing" now apparently, but would simply be seen as common sense just 10-15 years ago, like not wanting uncontrolled mass migration.
Have you considered that you may be in an echo chamber?

2026-02-20 21:37:41 UTC

Serves me well for using Shitcord.
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/0c/76/3f/0c763f57af18882f68255da0e1b198f7d5f72f01a443e08c97739e8ff67672a9.webp

2026-01-24 07:39:44 UTC

I've used #BlueSky for about a day or two more than a year ago, and defended feminist views / criticized people slandering JK Rowling. Today, got this email.
It can't be stressed enough just how much of a clown show the whole platform is. Apparently, they consider the expression of feminist opinions to be terrorism and criminal.
I think it's probably based on the fact that I said the nazis did not specifically persecute "trans people" in the way they persecuted gay people or Jews. According to trans activists, that's "Holocaust revisionism," which they excuse JK Rowling of. And from there, I'm guessing, they tell themselves that my posts could be considered to be disseminating content for neo-nazi groups, hence this moderation decision. It's mental gymnastics at Olympic level.
They are living in an alternate reality, and the reason they're perpetually mad is that actual reality won't bend to their will. It's sad.
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/56/50/df/5650dfc0b63ff3ca8481750a11e68a940a577e39f362753a539e538672ff9bce.jpg

2026-01-09 16:39:37 UTC

BNF fucking sucks. PEG is so much better it's not even funny.
But the problem is, with BNF you can auto-generate random text to stress-test your parser. With PEG that's literally impossible.
So you write PEG to create a parser, and then try to write the equivalent BNF to stress-test it with random data...
Except in my case I wrote the parser by hand so what I actually need to do is send random data to both my hand-written parser and the PEG generated parser and somehow see if they behave the same...
God damn, grammars are difficult.

2025-11-17 20:33:22 UTC

Nerd shit:
Imagine a bunch of physicists, chemists, biologists etc. sat down together to create an alternate fantasy reality that's basically ours but with key modifications to the fundamental laws of nature (general relativity, standard model of particle physics) so that magical spells, fantasy species, spirits, the undead, etc. can exist and be explained "scientifically" in a coherent manner.
Could probably even include time travel. In fact, ubiquitous use of wormholes through spacetime could explain some of the common schools of magic, like summoning, and perhaps evocation, speaking in D&D terms.

2025-11-12 16:33:29 UTC

What did my girlfriend mean by this?
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/67/9b/38/679b386cde3290654bf670bb1140fb92cd720630944eb70c16034e73a21a7117.jpg

2025-11-08 05:31:49 UTC

I want to express SUPPORT for #Framework Computers @nprofile…vmar as someone who:
- Went deep into #feminism a number of years ago and was on the side of feminists during the whole GamerGate thing.
- Continues to support even *radical* feminist political analysis and perspectives within reason, as well as gay rights and what have you.
- Is otherwise a lefty liberal progressive pro-democracy guy opposed to *actual* right-wing extremists, while upholding freedom of speech.
It seems like the #GNOME Foundation @nprofile…6tqm has some people in it who are a little over-enthusiastic about trying to "detect" fascists everywhere they look, and are trying to bully Framework into submission for not adopting their extreme political positions unrelated to Free Software.
How about we stop LARPing as the Stasi, and stick to Free Software activism instead?

2025-10-22 12:30:02 UTC

The FSF keeps posting people's "reason to donate." Would it be incendiary if I donated and said:
> Seems to be the only free software organisation that doesn't implement discriminatory policies against those who don't follow woke politics.
I don't love the term "woke" though. :blobcat-thinking:

2025-10-13 07:05:11 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…sq4v
Wow, looks delicious!

2025-10-13 06:57:55 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…kkxq As a German and as someone who wants to change the minds of right wing people instead of trying to bully them into submission, I find it deeply shameful how nonchalantly you abuse the word "nazi."
Thank you for your service in emboldening and radicalising right wing people further with such language, making the lives of sane leftists so much harder. Really appreciate it. :blobcat-thumbsup:

2025-10-06 04:46:07 UTC

When I hold cash in my Wise account, they literally pay me for it. And I don't pay Wise anything other than some low transfer fees when actually making a transfer.
The German banks on the other hand take some money from you every month regardless of how much you use their services.
Should I transfer all my money to Wise? :blobcat-thonking:

2025-10-03 07:41:40 UTC

Blizzard are such money-hungry bastards now. Original Diablo 2 costs 10 bucks, LoD expansion another 10 bucks, and if you want to buy D2:R instead, it's 40 bucks.
Come on bro, just give me the original + xpac for free if I buy D2:R so I can try out both D2:R and PD2 (mod based on original).
Not like I couldn't shell out 60 bucks to get both but maybe I should just sail the high seas out of spite.

2025-10-01 15:22:51 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…8lcl @nprofile…hmru
> Lolicon cunny@tsundere.love
Are you him? :blobcat-thonking:

2025-09-27 22:46:56 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…hmru The Contributor Covenant is a sure way to turn a community into a toxic cultish mess.
What repo is that btw?

2025-09-12 06:12:47 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…5k85 @nprofile…g9nu @nprofile…ejm6
I think I get what he's saying.
- You get your salary, paying income tax.
- You buy a product with it, paying sales tax.
- The company pays the profit as a salary to its employees, subject to income tax.
- They buy a product with it, paying sales tax.
- ... ad infinitum
Taxes are applied every time money changes hands. By that logic, inheritance can be taxed as well. It's like bonus salary, but from your relatives instead of an employer.
If inheritance tax prevents working classes from accumulating wealth, then I'd say the problem is the formula. It should be a progressive tax, remaining 0% until a certain floor is reached, just like income tax (in most places anyway, I think).
E.g. in Germany you pay zero income tax until your salary reaches, I don't know, let's say 500 bucks or whatever per month. Then for every buck on top of that you start paying increasingly large percentages as tax. There's also an upper limit on the percentage. Found a graphic. The solid line is the percentage applied to each additional Euro you make; the dotted line is what that ends up being as a percentage of your total salary.
You just tweak this to make things fairer for lower incomes. Same principle should be used for inheritance tax instead of abolishing it, if the current numbers prevent wealth accumulation for working people.
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/b4/b6/39/b4b639fa71681dba3e32bea5dd04e3ed60f1590c6fac9860908ebc8a99fef807.jpg

2025-09-10 00:22:20 UTC

Guys, he never wrote a picture in his life, OK?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjh1jOJZAaY

2025-09-09 22:58:34 UTC

I had a nightmare last night that everyone's fedi accounts were getting hacked. Mine too. It was really bizarre. I think mine was hacked by @nprofile…csx6 but he was just doing it to troll me. Changed my profile picture to some weird anime thing.

2025-09-09 22:38:55 UTC

Something tells me that these accusations are complete horseshit.
RE: https://annihilation.social/objects/af719421-d496-4885-ba5a-0aab56e41d63
#nevent1q…pmav

2025-09-09 21:10:01 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…3kus The current German prime minister was against criminalizing marital rape.
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/80/df/35/80df35c0a256f42f66a754b78ef2a00488cacf90ef29d99fd92f6cfbd6803ff1.webp

2025-09-09 20:53:48 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…h6f2
"It's literally the same thing just completely different."
:blobcat-googly-trash:

2025-08-26 01:02:44 UTC

- reply

The four freedoms of the Free Gender Foundation:
Freedom 0: The freedom to say fuck your pronouns.
Freedom 1: The freedom to reject the proprietary 'cis' label.
Freedom 2: The freedom to use accurate scientific language.
Freedom 3: The freedom to have any non-harmful personality you want, regardless of your sex.

2025-08-26 00:58:49 UTC

Gender identity is proprietary. Queer feminism doesn't respect your gender freedoms.
We here at the Free Gender Foundation are campaigning for everyone's full freedom from gender shite.

2025-08-26 00:52:54 UTC

Imagine nerd culture but not obsessed with irrational fantasy identities.
Would go so hard.

2025-08-25 22:45:13 UTC

- reply

> As of late September 2023, the Berlin government was “offering children a pro-prostitution picture book” to teach them about sex work. – Misleading
> Reduxx: https://reduxx.info/germany-pro-prostitution-picture-book-offered-to-children-by-government-officials/
> Snopes: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/berlin-children-prostitution-book/
Yeah, you could say the title is "misleading" because the government officials weren't walking up to kids offering these books to them in person.
But they did endorse the book in question on an official government website. Which is explained immediately if you actually read the article, meaning it's factually accurate.
> ‘Pro-Pedophile’ Activist Group Celebrates As Germany Decriminalizes Child Porn Possession. – Mostly False
> Reduxx: https://reduxx.info/pro-pedophile-activist-group-celebrates-as-germany-decriminalizes-child-porn-possession/
> Snopes: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/germany-decriminalizes-child-porn/
The labeling as "mostly false" is completely inaccurate. You could argue again that the title is "misleading" because the word "descriminalize" is easy to misunderstand. Possession of CSAM was apparently downgraded from a "crime" to a "misdemeanor." To quote the official announcement from the Bundestag:
> Die in Paragraf 184b Strafgesetzbuch geregelten Delikte werden somit als Vergehen und nicht als Verbrechen eingestuft.
> source: https://www.bundestag.de/presse/hib/kurzmeldungen-1002810
Reduxx's translation is completely accurate. The term Vergehen means offense or misdemeanor, whereas Verbrechen means crime.
My verdict of the bias and factuality of mediabiasfactcheck.com: ❌ COMPLETE HORSESHIT

2025-08-25 22:22:37 UTC

- reply

They rate Reduxx as "mixed" in factuality, citing two instances of "failed fact checks" which are links to Snopes. :blobcat-thonking:
Upon closer inspection, both seem fairly accurate, and the only problem is nitpicking over choice of words.

2025-08-25 22:09:07 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…772x If you're:
- ok with waiting until the last season to be explained wtf the whole thing is even about (they drop many bits and pieces of lore as they go, but you don't get a *full* explanation until s6)
Or
- enjoy watching constant love and relationship related drama
Then yeah I guess. Especially if you have time to just binge it. I'm watching it kinda slowly because we're watching it together with my little brother who actually has a life and can't watch 5 hours per day.

2025-08-25 21:03:07 UTC

Someone needs to check mediabiasfactcheck.com for bias and factuality.

2025-08-25 20:02:14 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…fjqm Nah. The ones behind Reduxx are OK.
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/82/b2/c2/82b2c2cc7070f14c6ba0eecd7aa77f808d5186d284aec15bdeaf9581226f2199.webp

2025-08-25 17:13:03 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…fjqm
No. Only the ones who report on things I don't want people to hear about or put a spin on stories that I personally disagree with.

2025-08-24 22:29:26 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…v6k8 Can't help irrational fears. If my hand accidentally touched that thing I would have screamed and ran away, and even just looking at it gives me the heebie jeebies so vacuum it is. :blobcat-sweat:

2025-08-24 22:15:48 UTC

> giganormous spider on bathroom wall
> go get vacuum cleaner
> giganormous spider nowhere to be found
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/97/b0/38/97b03889dd43b7286e300a9d3fa43d0b3cf91e0881b62d22ef24f0016a5eeab1.gif

2025-08-24 17:59:11 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…auwy Awesome. Looking fine indeed for that age!

2025-08-24 17:31:40 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…auwy The fur looks very soft and shiny. :blobcat-hearts:

2025-08-20 20:36:05 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…euhg wow this just got better and better all the way up to and including the very last word.

2025-08-18 12:08:10 UTC

The other Taylan in my head: "Come on man trans is just the new emo so just leave them alone even if their ideas are dumb."
Ok but emos didn't campaign for castrating children and destroying women's rights and gay rights and get people fired from their jobs for refusing to join anti-scientific magical thinking.
It's clearly the children who are out of touch.

2025-08-17 09:41:50 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…hmru @nprofile…nx93 @nprofile…mawa
> Vaccine proven completely safe
> Significantly reduces risk of severe illness
> You get it literally for free
> You're free to refuse it, you just have to stay out of certain enclosed public spaces for a couple months
> A couple retards on social media post edgy shit about people who refuse it
> The only actual case of serious violence is from the anti-vax side
Yeah man it's Literally 1984.

2025-08-06 21:59:55 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…w3qa
In my experience, being age 31 now and having chronic mental issues:
- A good workout can sometimes provide a "high" but that's not something one should rely on / not what you should be training for.
- Starting at a certain age (~30) you need to learn to go at least a *bit* easy on yourself, because your body won't recover the same.
- If you're dealing with health issues (including mental ones!!!) the last point applies ten-fold, and you have to accept that some days you can only do 5 minutes of cycling and a few curls with half the weight you normally lift; this is usually still better than doing nothing and you should still feel good with yourself for having done it.
Still struggling to embrace these principles myself. I keep over-training and then going inactive again for a week because I can't recover.

2025-08-05 18:23:12 UTC

The Duality of Man
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/fe/e1/cf/fee1cf038af32d3e4673bbfa11007d084d3d30467aee2023f0f963f312aff5ab.webp
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/01/3f/24/013f24a31ef4759198f4b765a05a1c01d0a5ee2bbfd75dea8f5d7484f7c65eab.webp

2025-08-03 13:10:10 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…xfx6 Don't think you can remotely diagnose schizophrenia like that.

2025-08-03 11:12:31 UTC

And then they mock me for being a Male Radical Feminist. :blobcat-pensive2:
RE: https://annihilation.social/objects/be55d4a4-e118-46cd-a468-a6f4af7deff9
#nevent1q…6slv

2025-07-28 21:32:28 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…v256 @nprofile…4r49 @nprofile…zw4s
> filed under penalty of perjury
It's literally an online form anyone on the planet can fill out you absolute goof.
I filled it out once (from Germany), saying the vaccine turned me into Shrek. Maybe you'll find it among those over one million reports.

2025-07-28 19:54:15 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…v256 @nprofile…4r49 @nprofile…zw4s
Imagine still being so retarded you latch on to the VAERS meme in 2025.

2025-07-28 19:41:15 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…zw4s @nprofile…4r49
I don't personally care much about COVID boosters but if you think not getting vaccinated at all is the better option then you're the retarded one buddy.
> noauthority.social
Why the fuck do I bother.

2025-07-28 19:22:20 UTC

Huh, just learned that the "per capita casualties" of October 7th were approximately 10x that of 9/11.
During 9/11, approximately 3K people died, at a US population size of around 300M. That's 1 for every 100K.
During 10/7, approximately 1K people died, at an Israeli population size of around 10M. That's 1 for every 10K.
I've used very rounded numbers but the point is that it's a difference of an order of magnitude.

2025-07-28 14:45:25 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…4r49 WDYM gave up the L? Was he a vaccine skeptic but then admitted he was wrong?

2025-07-28 14:10:10 UTC

It's Summer 2025 and I'm arguing with COVID vaccine skeptics.
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/78/a7/a3/78a7a329ca57a369832a655be58605527dcdb41ba6afaa47ab0befbb5e09f10d.gif

2025-07-27 10:23:45 UTC

I wish more people seriously engaged with this issue and thought critically about it.
If you want absolutely ALL fictional graphical material to be legal, no matter how obscene, based on the logic of "it doesn't cause objective, physical harm to anyone," then by your own logic you must also ask for the legalization of recordings of violent and/or sexual crimes, including those involving children, because the availability of such recordings does not cause objective, physical harm to anyone.
Your first retort may be: "OK, but it causes re-traumatization to the victim, who did at some point suffer physically." (In other words, you concede that at least some forms of subjective, emotional harm are important too; not just objective, physical harm.)
And what if the victim is deceased? This means there exists no human who suffered physically who could be re-traumatized.
Of course, the family of the victim would still be extremely disturbed. So now we accept another type of subjective, emotional harm.
And what if the entire family is deceased? Would you then allow the dissemination of such a recording, that sick fucks get off to? Why not?
You must accept at some point that at least a few select forms of censorship of extremely obscene material are acceptable, if not in fact desirable, in a civil society that cares about public well-being.
Then why do you scoff at the concept of obscenity laws altogether? Do you really want to make certain forms of child porn legal as well? Don't contradict yourself.
By the way, another angle with which you can look at obscenity laws is that they aren't just about respecting the emotional well being of people, but also about censoring material that could be seen as encouraging certain crimes, such as for example by making a sexual crime appear "sexy" to the audience, or by making a violent crime appear fun to commit.
So it can be about preventing objective, physical harm after all. And also from this angle, it's not clear why a recording of a real crime and a digital rendering of a virtual crime are so different. Both could encourage the audience by making the crime appear attractive. From both angles, we reach the same conclusion.
RE: https://fedi.feministwiki.org/notice/AwWdUCtXbaE3EpUC6S
#nevent1q…emam

2025-07-26 13:50:20 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/92/b4/c8/92b4c8a95ecf47a63d5b03048057abfe5182a1aaddfd9a7ac976a44e1088b8ae.webp

2025-07-26 13:15:41 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
> You're a real idiot if you take what the PARTIES believe as any kind of litmus test of what the population believes.
I was specifically talking about the population.
> [the entire next paragraph]
You are definitely living in an echo chamber, lol.
> Face it. You're just a guy who thinks his ideological label makes him special enough that he needs his own space
Umm ackshually, I don't apply labels to myself. :blobcat-cool:
> (and he gets a license to creep in the feminist women's spaces too, what a surprise!)
Bro is delusional on another level. :blobcat-3c:

2025-07-26 12:40:59 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
> Even normies are more supportive of trannies than they are of TERFs now, because they look at the situation and see it for what it is: a bunch of privileged whiners (who everyone was sick of hearing from anyway) picking on a minority who need protection.
LMAOOOOOOO you are so out of touch bro. It's literally the opposite. Both conservatives and centrists are favoring the so-called "TERFs" and even liberals are slowly getting de-radicalized and starting to understand the issues with the transgender movement.
I think you only think what you think because you spend time on fedi and similar places, which represent an extremely atypical section of society (mostly male turbo-nerds). (I'm also a male turbo-nerd, I'm not using that as an insult. :blobcat-extremejoy:)

2025-07-26 12:37:51 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…znwq @nprofile…85l6 @nprofile…wrqe
That is not an argument. What's the practical difference between:
- A rendering of fictional child abuse
- A graphical recording of a case of real child abuse that happened long in the past such that the victim and all close relatives are long deceased
In both cases, it's literally just a bunch of pixels on people's screens, not involving any person who currently exists. What is your logic for censoring the second, but not the first? (I've explained mine; I'd like to hear yours.)
I think any argument you make is necessarily going to be one based on emotions and abstract moral principles, rather than any concrete harm that is directly caused to any real human being.
But please, be my guest and explain your logic. I'd genuinely like to hear it, no sarcasm.

2025-07-26 12:30:50 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
> all I care about is that you're crying and whining about it and that nobody is listening to you
Except that gender critical beliefs are literally protected by law in the UK now. :blobcat-smug:
> "It didn't happen but if it did you deserved it" is the standard position for this kind of ideological combat isn't it? You should know, your team made up the rules. 😁
I really don't think you know what you're talking about man. Like what "team" I'm supposed to be a member of. Get better informed bro.

2025-07-26 12:21:59 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
> You don't see it because you genuinely believe TERFs are oppressed. :laughing_cirno:
You see this is the part I don't get: Either you
- Accept that so-called "TERFs" are being unfairly abused, and are trying to claim that the same abuse is happening to some other demographic which I'm ignoring, or you
- Don't accept that, in which case there's no parallel to draw, and besides I've shown evidence that it's true?
> Also yes, you got angry suddenly when I minimised your TERF struggle. 🎻😢
Honest to god, maybe I would get angry if I understood what your actual argument even is, but right now I've no fucking idea because you're not making any sense. :blobcat-extremejoy:

2025-07-26 12:18:01 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…85l6 @nprofile…wrqe
This is just the typical slippery slope argument / false equivalence that's always used when it comes to censorship issues.
I agree that using payment blockages and other such things to silence political positions and genuine artistic expressions is horrible. But an incest rape game that only serves a pornographic purpose, rather than being a legitimate piece of artistic expression or social commentary, is different.
It's the same issue as freedom of speech vs. hate speech. I hold free speech highly and think social media platforms should never ban people for having political opinions that the host doesn't like. But being allowed to spam "I fucking hate nigger kike tranny faggots I hope they all die" on repeat into social media isn't really any kind of serious speech or legitimate artistic expression, so a user who does that could be reasonably banned to clean up the place and I couldn't possibly care about it.
"But who gets to decide what's legitimate artistic expression or political commentary, and what's just empty hate speech or simple obscenity for purely pornographic purposes?"
We do as a society. I don't really see the point in these "proxy debates" over freedom of speech, or neutrality of payment processors, because in reality we all agree that *some* things can and should be censored, such as libel, or for example child abuse images.
Consider ages old abuse videos of a real child who is deceased, and who has no close relatives alive who could be psychologically tormented by the circulation of these videos. Why do we nevertheless make it illegal to spread such content? Because it deeply degrades our collective moral character as an entire society if we allow it.
I want the same treatment to be given to games or other media whose sole purpose is clearly to make hateful and abusive crimes, sexual or otherwise, appear exciting and titillating to the audience. Not a game like GTA 5, which contains a crapload of genuine artistic expression, social commentary, and so on; I'm rather talking about games like "Bitch Rape Simulator 3000" or "Nigger Lyncher: KKK Edition" (made up titles).
The current censorship as implemented by the credit card companies probably spreads too wide of a net and over-censors rather than under-censors. (I haven't looked closely.) It's a bit of a pendulum swing situation. I hope that eventually the pendulum will slow down in the middle, but I'm not going to lose my mind over the fact that it swung a bit too far in the opposite direction after decades of extremely degrading porn getting a free run. The porn industry, and degrading porn culture more generally, have way overstayed their welcome in modern western culture.

2025-07-26 11:53:37 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
> basically "u mad"
no u
> And no, obviously I wasn't saying that, I was saying that none of the things you said happened happened and that you're making it up. 😔
I genuinely don't get what argument you're trying to make here. It seems like you're trying to draw a parallel, but I just don't see it. No cap.

2025-07-26 11:22:13 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…85l6 @nprofile…wrqe
You know, I'm not too fond of censorship generally, but I want incest rape games burned off the face of the fucking planet.
Now, from what I hear, the credit card companies went a bit too far and banned much more than that.
But the only reason for that is that the incest rape games exist. Without those, this movement wouldn't have had a leg to stand on and wouldn't have gained the traction it did.
Let it be a wake up call to everyone who wants to make a porn game. "Reel in your degeneracy, or the 'fun' will stop altogether eventually."
Think of it like parents taking away toys from their kids because the kids couldn't fucking behave themselves.

2025-07-26 11:18:17 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
> LMAO yes that's the exact one I mean. How does it feel to be told to your face that all of that shit just straight up isn't happening, that you're hallucinating it and that you're making it up and you don't deserve any help?
What even is your argument here? I legitimately don't get it. Are you claiming that feminists have been physically assaulting gamers in the streets? :blobcat-extremejoy:
> It's so cute to watch your blood boil after you came in so gung-ho in the beginning.
Qué? :blobcat-googly-confused:
My blood is a fairly normal ~37°C right now.
> For the record, I hope the trannies lynch you all in the street.
Cope and seethe. :blobcat-creepy-grin:

2025-07-26 11:05:59 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
You mean the "invisible political menace" that puts up effigies of women, paints death threats on their windows, physically assaults them, celebrates such assaults on social media, and writes articles about how this is all morally good?
Man, "invisible" forces pack quite the fucking punch nowadays.

2025-07-26 10:23:56 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe You can read here what I have to say about that term, based on well-documented FACTS and LOGIC:
https://feministwiki.org/wiki/TERF

2025-07-26 09:34:35 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
Sounds like some pretty dumb stuff.
You don't need to tell me about the harms of woke cancel culture and obsessive faux-progressives.
By the way, I'll also grant you 100% that criticizing Detroit: Become Human was incredibly stupid on behalf of Collective Shout, and I'm guessing it was simply a massive boomer moment. They should get some millennial or gen z women who actually play video games (such as, funnily enough, someone like Anita Sarkeesian) to look through their list of games to criticize to make sure they're not having dumb boomer moments like this.
But equating all anti-porn / anti-objectification / anti-misogyny activism with woke cancel culture is not correct. A crapton of women who agree with those criticisms of video games are actually against woke nonsense like that. They usually get slagged off with slurs like "TERF" by the woke crowd, for not toeing the party line so to speak.

2025-07-26 09:07:50 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
ROFL, I like your style. :blobcat-extremejoy:
I tried to buy F&H a year or two ago and it was impossible to begin with due to Steam not offering it in Germany.
And IIRC the author didn't put it up for purchase on any other platform, which I'm afraid is his problem.
If I were an indie dev, I would let people pay me directly through a number of methods, and offer them a download link. (In addition to putting it up on Steam.)
I would put in a note saying that although I'm against DRM and I cannot prevent people from sharing the game with their friends, they should please consider trying to convince their friends into actually buying it if they truly enjoy it / should please consider buying it if they received a gratis copy and enjoy it.
(I'd also probably release the code under GPL and only make the artwork proprietary or something.)

2025-07-26 07:43:35 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…wrqe
Huh, I never heard of anyone call gaymergate a genocide.
If anything, it seemed like the anti feminist side saw it as a "genocide" of muh glorious manly video games.
Anyway, I'm glad degenerate porn games are finally getting the treatment they deserve. :blobcat-smug:
If you're an adult who can handle a porn game, you should be smart enough to be able to use alternative payment methods and distribution platforms to attain the games you want.
So, all this practically does is reduce the visibility of this type of content and make it difficult for kids to buy with the credit cards or PayPal accounts of their moms and dads.

2025-07-26 04:27:52 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…772x Most prominent Epstein victim. Had a crash with a bus, almost died, was discharged, then supposedly died by suicide shortly after.

2025-07-25 13:41:38 UTC

The Virginia Giuffre article on #Wikipedia contains absolutely no mention of this tweet and the page is locked.
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/eb/4f/a3/eb4fa36f15f410c9ab31019292c9b8389cd4aa000a9ef88c18f0fa0004fd9e2e.webp

2025-07-17 23:26:46 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…w8cy @nprofile…nvyk @nprofile…gu4k @nprofile…al36 @nprofile…al5r
Lmao stay mad I guess. I'm still gonna shit on right wing chuds whether you like it or not.

2025-07-17 17:20:48 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…w8cy @nprofile…nvyk @nprofile…gu4k @nprofile…al36 @nprofile…al5r
Man, Hoss is such an incel. I remember him talking about how finding a partner is all about men's "status" so I pointed out to him how I've been super financially stable and shit for over a decade yet didn't have a gf until recently (age 30), whereas my broke ass brother who's 10 years younger has been with many girls, dumped both of his exes, never been dumped (AFAIK), etc. and then Hoss says he must be some kind of ultra attractive gigachad... No, he's a soft boy who was raised by a feminist mom and a Male Feminist™ older brother. :blobcat-smirk:
He's gonna mald at me now but I have him on mute because he was basically caping for nazis a while ago so he can seethe into the void.
Finding a partner is not about anything in particular. There's a shit ton of personality types who can find and fit each other. The single biggest factor that makes finding a partner easier is probably "normalcy" because normal people attract normal people, and most people are normal, so being normal maximises your pool of potential partners. My little brother is probably one of the most normal people within our entire extended family, whereas I'm, well, me. :blobcat-extremejoy:
Assuming Hoss has difficulty finding a partner, it would be related to being a right wing chud on the fucking Fediverse, posting crude and childish cartoons of trans people hanging themselves like he's an edgy sixth grader. (And if he doesn't have such difficulty finding a partner, it's because he's too cowardly to show his true power level IRL.)

2025-07-17 04:34:11 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…nvyk
> it's going to hurt LGBTQ+ gamers and devs
> LGBTQ+
That's the weirdest spelling of "pornography" I've ever seen.
No seriously though, why the fuck do self proclaimed liberals constantly equate LGBT with pornography. Is that what LGBT is in their minds? A porn thing?

2025-07-17 04:23:45 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…df62
My name is Taylan Kammer and I approve of this message.

2025-07-14 15:22:37 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…szf5 @nprofile…pj05 @nprofile…4te5 @nprofile…cu97
To expand on this a bit:
When you use terms like Jewish Nazis, Judio Nazis, etc., it comes across like you're invoking the term "Nazi" in this context to essentially mock Jews for the Holocaust. Whether you intend it or not, you should be aware that this is what it sometimes comes across as. "We will call you by the name of the group that did the Holocaust because fuck you that's why." Maybe don't, unless your intention is to stoke more hatred on all sides.

2025-07-14 15:12:27 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…szf5 @nprofile…cu97 @nprofile…4te5 @nprofile…pj05
If we're calling every evil person/group a nazi now, then I guess this is a nazi vs. nazi war.
Islamo Nazis vs. Judeo Nazis
To be honest though, I think the way some of you guys seem obsessed with calling Jews "Nazi" is really unhinged and retarded.
How often do you do that with other groups committing evil acts? Do you regularly use the term Russo Nazis when talking about Russia's invasion of the Ukraine?(*) Do you talk about Afghan Nazis when it's about the Taliban, or maybe Islamo Nazis when talking about Islamist terror groups in general? Do you speak of Buddhist Nazis when you talk about the Myanmar genocide?
I'm guessing that you don't regularly use terms like this, but for some reason there seems to be a trend of referring to the IDF, Israel, etc. as Nazis, Judeo Nazis, Jewish Nazis, and so on.
I wonder why that is. What kind of satisfaction do you get from referring to Jews with the name of the one group that wanted to eradicate them globally, and systematically murdered millions of them just 80 years ago?
(*) Not to imply that Russia's invasion of Ukraine is equivalent to Israel's invasion of Gaza. From what I know, the latter is actually justifiable based on the actions of Hamas, whereas the former is almost purely one sided aggression. Which is also not to say that the actions of the IDF, post invasion, are justified.

2025-07-11 00:12:20 UTC

Should I change my profile pic to this and stop being angry half the time? Go full Arawi Keiichi mode?
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/b1/af/d5/b1afd5289615e00ac104288894094d1fefe5523bbda4cd55ba3b028c9bf22d2e.jpg

2025-07-08 17:25:05 UTC

> XLibre GitHub Wiki Page Defaced by a Convicted Rapist & an Anti-Semite
https://fedi-uploads.feministwiki.org/media/96/e7/02/96e702849b842bdb1c58817e8384058e75508a6b93dd775af5b7df8d51f782da.png

2025-07-07 13:55:30 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…p3jt I have different sets of weird bugs with both X11 and Wayland but X11 seems to be the less buggy one right now.
I wish Wayland never existed. 16 years later it's still not better than X11, so what's the point. They should have tried to improve X instead.
I've also used X11 forwarding in the past and may do so again at some point. It's supposed to be possible with Wayland but I already know how it works with X11 and you literally just need ssh.

2025-07-01 03:56:23 UTC

Once again I slept like maybe 60% of the time I've been lying in bed. :blobcat-disappointed:
I think I at least got in 6 hours or so.

2025-06-30 14:09:37 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…ns9x @nprofile…vqps @nprofile…359z
I don't think either of those things are hatred. For example, not recognizing a faithful Jewish person as being God's Chosen (because I'm an atheist and don't believe in any god in the first place) would not be considered hatred, would it? Similarly, I don't see why not seeing transwomen as women (because I don't believe in gender identity) should be considered hatred. It's an ideological disagreement.
Getting on their nerves, well, is not something that harms them in any substantive way, is it? Not any more than how much I'm being continuously harmed by the presence of the CoC in the Guix repository, which definitely gets on my nerves. I could as well say: If I'm being "hateful" by saying the things I'm saying, then the Guix maintainers are being "hateful" by insisting on keeping the CoC in the repository.

2025-06-30 13:36:41 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…ns9x @nprofile…vqps @nprofile…359z
Where's the hate?