Sjors Provoost (possibly compromised)

"The dollar is king, we're gonna keep it that way. Just saying, if people wanna challenge it, they can, but they're going to pay a big price. And I don't think any of them are willing to pay that price." - Donald Trump
Now you know. To be fair, it was in reference to BRICS and you can't accuse the man of consistency.
https://fountain.fm/episode/gzfxBKiY94NTCUKySPQ2
#nevent1q…zr7g

2025-05-31 18:49:10 UTC

- reply

Still can't believe X users have their (eye) balls scanned.
https://fountain.fm/episode/rgEmfe8E7ivWuORiUdA1
#nevent1q…vfly

2025-05-12 07:22:19 UTC

- reply

Whaha, I've been in DC more often than Odell and I'm a foreigner.
https://fountain.fm/episode/0SwABFKl22JmThk9ARlz
#nevent1q…mfnv

2025-05-10 11:52:23 UTC

Removals after removal are my favorite type of removal. And I have a PR on top of this that removes even more :-) #MakeBitcoinCoreMaintainableAgain
#nevent1q…phvg

2025-05-10 11:35:39 UTC

There seems to be genuine confusion about how open source works. In particular some people believe that Bitcoin Core developers have a fiduciary duty, either towards them personally or towards some general notion of the Bitcoin network. They are surprised that I and some others respond to this rather aggressively.
Remember that this is the argument Craig Wright tried to make. He failed, but not after millions of dollars were burnt on defending these developers. And not after several quit because of the stress. Don't go down this path.
To put it as a catchy phrase: open source means you can do whatever you want with the code, not with the people who write it.
Open source lets you fork code, and modify it to your liking. That's pretty much what I do every day, which isn't to say that I don't also try to make sure other people like it. I get paid in Bitcoin and OpenSats keeps their whole treasury in it, so the idea that I want destroy potential future income is rather retarded.
Part of CSW's demands was that Bitcoin Core wrote specific (confiscation) code for him. Eventually he just hired people to write it for him, as one should, but somehow that still wasn't enough for him. I get a very similar vibe from people who run Knots but yet don't find that enough. Should we worry about a new round of lawsuits?

2025-05-10 10:02:17 UTC

- reply

It's also unclear what he's offended by. If it's the "catholic" part, I'm merely describing the suspect without any value judgement. There's additional context that allowed me to narrow it down. I won't share that, because it's something only the perpetrator would know, so potentially relevant if they escalate.

2025-05-10 09:54:26 UTC

- reply

Ja, ik ben een van de (daadwerkelijke) reviewers van de pull request(s) die de op_return limiet verwijderen. Mijn ack heeft aanzienlijk meer gewicht dan een drive-by commenter. Daarnaast heb ik een vrij uitgesproken en geïnformeerde (toch?) mening over dit onderwerp hier op nostr en mijn podcast.
Ik ben hier niet bepaald gevoelig voor, danwel ik raak er extra gemotiveerd van, maar veel developers zijn een stuk voorzichtiger en zouden hier wel degelijk door ontmoedigd worden. Zie bijvoorbeeld de opmerking op Reddit van achow101 dat ze onmiddellijk op unsubscribe drukte van die eerste pull request.

2025-05-10 09:44:03 UTC

- reply

Intimidatie. Zelfde principe als een granaat voor je door, alleen een mildere stap. Probleem is dat je niet weet wat de volgende stap is.

2025-05-10 09:42:29 UTC

- reply

No. Donations are not a contract for performance of specific tasks or the creation of a fiduciary relationship. They are appreciated of course.

2025-05-10 08:21:42 UTC

Someone, probably a US based catholic young male, subscribed my email to a bunch of lists in order to spam me. I can't be bothered to trace the IP they used for this. But Luke, control your herd.

2025-05-08 09:25:32 UTC

Guess who's back? https://bitcoinexplainedpodcast.com/@nado/episodes/episode-98-return-of-the-op-return

2025-05-06 18:49:43 UTC

Excellent take by me! :-)
The fact that many Bitcoin Core developers are paid by someone, when that someone is NOT YOU, does not make YOU a customer that gets to demand things. You need to hire developers directly if you want to work on your behalf.
#nevent1q…x62e

2025-05-06 18:36:48 UTC

- reply

Quadrupple it!

2025-05-06 18:20:11 UTC

- reply

That particular section was mostly written ten years ago, even before the Blocksize wars. Social media powered brigading wasn't much of a thing back then. It could make sense to update it and mention that each fork may or may not have a moderation policy.
https://img.sprovoost.nl/845ede961226b3d832259cca1fea1ea96d195debbf21512b1eba2918475f48b7.webp

2025-05-06 18:06:06 UTC

- reply

Moderation guidelines are not in the Bitcoin Core codebase itself. That would make no sense, since any fork could and should have its own policy.
There's ongoing effort to move bitcoin/bitcoin to bitcoin-core/bitcoin to reduce that confusion.
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/meta/blob/main/MODERATION-GUIDELINES.md

2025-05-06 12:38:52 UTC

- reply

[1] De Volkskrant, 29 april 2025, ‘Cryptomijnen in een land onder hoogspanning’, (https://www.volkskrant.nl/kijkverder/v/2025/ethiopie-bitcoin-miners-crypto~v1402259/) 

2025-05-02 19:54:08 UTC

And now for something ... completely different: https://youtu.be/2URXWmTiajA

2025-05-02 17:51:25 UTC

Roger Ver 'calm and politely' calling out Bitcoin Core censorship, even of people who've been around since the early days. He calls out their conflicts of interest and corruption, their deviation from the original version of Bitcoin... And they always go off on these super technical tangents. And they're mean on camera. "Won't even answer a single question".
Install Bitcoin ABC, now! (yes, it's still actively maintained)
P.S. wow people were young back then
https://youtu.be/dUxXGmgv5mo

2025-05-02 14:16:53 UTC

- reply

Yes, that's on. But I get a notification for each zap afaik. I don't get that many, a few per day, but I really don't like push notifications :-)

2025-05-02 13:20:03 UTC

- reply

Since then he hasn't attacked me personally, until now, because I reviewed a pull request he hates.
In the mean time Luke has attacked Bitcoin Core on multiple occasions, e.g. creating needless drama around Taproot activation. Meanwhile despite calling Bitcoin Core all sort of bad names, he uses 99.99% of its code for Knots. Although he does occasionally contribute back, and of course has contributed much in the far past, it's not a healthy open source relationship.
Much of the drama he creates also comes across as either blatant self-promotion or his company Ocean (which I like, so that's unfortunate).

2025-05-02 10:59:21 UTC

- reply

If you're worried about sitting on user funds for too long, and the app can't do all this in the background, it's fine if the app nags me once a day or so collect the sats. And send a push message like: X dust ready to collect!

2025-05-02 07:19:13 UTC

- reply

With regards to what I said here:
> This then encourages them to be on the safe side and use these filters. Bitcoin Core might then have to adopt similar rules in order to produce blocks that are safe.
This would be a "nice" use case for what Greg Maxwell suggested today on the mailing list (and earlier on Reddit), to separate relay policy from mining policy - where the latter can be more strict:
> That said, Bitcoin core has generally not
had knobs to adjust relay policy as distinct from mining policy in large
part because of the design assumption that the two need to be the same.
But in this case if there were a knob here I think would make more sense
for it to control mining policy rather than relay policy, since it would
actually have some effect in the mining context (in excluding the txn from
your own blocks) while as a relay only thing it is impotent.

2025-05-02 06:17:43 UTC

- reply

To be clear, this won't permanently censor these transactions either, but because not everyone is going to be sufficiently intimidated. But it will delay them more than in the scenario where those miners only exclude things from their own blocks. And definitely delay them more than can be achieved with just policy, even if 90% of nodes used these filters.

2025-05-01 18:43:10 UTC

> It is about time that we stop tolerating nonsense and come back to a place where most of us value (proof of) work, ideas, and selflessness instead of overblown emotional reactions, unbacked wild claims and adhesion to various cults.
Anyway, in the unlikely event I can restrain myself, this will be my last comment on this topic.
https://antoinep.com/posts/relay_policy_drama/

2025-05-01 17:24:49 UTC

https://img.sprovoost.nl/c3523912bc232cb58b308df5fcd0ebac658d5e346e97abc21ed8cd5d59c6f71b.png
#nevent1q…jpg0

2025-05-01 17:21:27 UTC

- reply

* met

2025-05-01 13:54:49 UTC

- reply

I also think that if you explore technical solutions that might _actually work_ (though also require people to spend their own money), rather than the current and proposed feel good settings, you quickly end up attacking the heart of censorship resistance.
nostr.
#nevent1q…shlf

2025-04-30 16:55:22 UTC

- reply

Interesting idea, could stimulate people to use Stratum v2 / DATUM without having to run a fork of Bitcoin Core:
> While discussing this here it does occur to me that there is a different line of compromise which might make more sense-- Bitcoin Core conflates relay policy and mining policy. The historical reason for this is that they should match or vaguely bad things happen. But in case where there is a dispute over policy it makes more sense for mining to be the more restrictive of the two, because the negative effects largely come from miners including txn nodes weren't expecting. So maybe it would make sense to change the option to be one that only changed mining policy. At least as mining policy it has a real effect (assuming you're mining!) -- I'm not sure, this is just an off the cuff thought.
Though this also sounds like an implementation headache, and it's still ultimately a placebo. Since this would only be used by tiny miners, the thing they don't like will go in the next block.
From that same thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1kab15o/comment/mprj4tv/?context=3

2025-04-30 14:11:48 UTC

- reply

Wait until you see their #SafetyShield
https://together.bunq.com/d/61799-extra-protection-for-your-crypto-with-safety-shield

2025-04-30 08:17:53 UTC

- reply

Packs of wolves?

2025-04-28 18:33:47 UTC

If you're an EU citizen you can give the European Commission feedback, in your language of choice, on their Orwellian, albeit not very concrete #DemocracyShield
It's not a proposed law, more like a policy direction. My main concern is that they're going to use this to institutionalize and expand the ad hoc ban on RT. So I wrote in my feedback that I find such censorship unacceptable, but otherwise they can do whatever.
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14587-Europees-schild-voor-de-democratie/F3538778_nl

2025-04-28 14:44:22 UTC

- reply

Maintaining such a patch is probably a couple of days work per year, assuming a worst case scenario of the patch being hard to maintain. Maybe half a day if you can cherry-pick it out of Knots.
This is a much lower bar than having to maintain a custom Bitcoin Core fork for consensus changes. Don't be shy.

2025-04-26 14:19:38 UTC

- reply

They're very good at hallucinating results that look right at first glance.

2025-04-25 09:33:28 UTC

- reply

Like the one I sent you now, which did go through.

2025-04-25 06:33:05 UTC

- reply

It would be nice if you could copy-paste a zap request into the app if somehow it's not picked up via the relay. E.g. this one: #note18yy…hlu4

2025-04-07 01:21:24 UTC

Great talks, nice birds. #MITexpo
https://image.nostr.build/f8bd388c339b1098ea1e960f3ef642819ff1c75867d5820a0ef3c224ca03bc21.jpg
https://image.nostr.build/192ef4ab2086099f890d79035ba492e884b3beb383b39ba987a1d74edea70efc.jpg

2025-04-04 12:10:27 UTC

- reply

Never waste an opportunity to further weaken privacy protection when at the same time you're bringing back chat control?

2025-03-02 04:57:28 UTC

- reply

Musk is welcome here too. I'm sure his first act will be to explain why Nostr clients should use Dogecoin as a relay. At which point I'm going to mute him. And yet life goes on.

2025-02-17 12:42:00 UTC

- reply

None of the methods listed by EBA prove anything (as I told them in my email). They're completely pointless rituals. But this method is actively harmful.
#nevent1q…nakq

2025-02-17 12:10:48 UTC

- reply

Ironically, as easily as lazy corporations can automate this compliance procedure, it's just as simple for an adversary to automate the act of complying with it.

2025-02-17 08:19:20 UTC

- reply

Yes, by sending fiat to the exchange.

2025-02-17 08:18:42 UTC

- reply

Which means you've now gone from one deposit that doesn't stand out much on chain, to a very obvious pattern of receiving sats from the exchange and sending them back, all using the same address. Plus your bank sees a small transaction going to an exchange and a large one coming back, which might trigger their alarm and they hold you fiat ransom too.

2025-02-17 08:05:21 UTC

https://img.sprovoost.nl/19667b5ff208cc09baaf3fa4c07398ef1a43ebc5d0e3ec1071821595384e2503.png
#nevent1q…6mva

2025-02-07 17:41:07 UTC

Quite a few wallet fingerprints, which you can't really blame on the protocol. But it does seem that combining lots of funds in a single transaction undoes the benefits of decoys. Bad news for merchants.
Hiding among N decoys is of limited use when law enforcement is really interested in you and just checks all N of them. Chainalysis has tools to make that easier. The video doesn't explain how they filter some of the decoys.
Also Chainalysis once again admits they're collecting IP addresses without consent. And that they're running bait "RPC" nodes, though it's really insane that any wallets connect to them over clearnet (albeit sometimes with VPN). But there are very bad Bitcoin wallets too.
Dandelion and 1-shot Tor broadcast (easier) remain good ideas.
Perhaps increasing the number of decoys to hundreds would fix the issue for a while.
Fundamentally though, it's better to not leave any bread crumbs on a blockchain, or other public spaces, to begin with. Which is why I think Lightning is a better design in theory. But beware of practice. If you e.g. use a custodial wallet, they know who you're paying (until blinded paths). As a recipient things are even worse.
So I guess both Monero and Lightning still suck for merchants (charities), but might be good enough for individual customers (donors).
Also note that the goal of chain analytics isn't necessarily to collect sufficiently strong evidence for conviction. Finding a (tractable number of) suspect(s) may be enough, then they know where to look for additional evidence. Being marked as a suspect by a black box algorithm should still be serious legal issue though.
#nevent1q…lley

2025-01-17 19:33:44 UTC

- reply

Very busy network, or are these txs violating one of the Inquisition soft fork rules? (which the default Bitcoin Core client doesn't enforce, but the 2-of-2 miners do).

2024-12-13 07:15:03 UTC

- reply

As the saying goes: markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay liquid. Most people will probably just use other means to move value if Bitcoin becomes unusable for a few decades.
> hide the traffic of your mining operations through tor or a vpn.
I'm not talking about censoring pool internet traffic. Rather to reactively reorg "bad" blocks. The mere thread of that should cause most rational actors to self-censor. Even if you offer 10x the block subsidy in fees for a single transaction the US government can easily afford reorging them all and wasting your money. But as I said above, at those prices that are cheaper ways to move value.

2024-12-13 07:04:03 UTC

- reply

Proper mining pool decentralization should mitigate this to some extend, so it's important to work on.

2024-12-06 18:09:46 UTC

- reply

"If you live in a place, then follow its rules" - @npub12rv…85vg

2024-11-27 08:10:52 UTC

Re: why didn't the Fith Circuit address validators. #note1eyr…fcf2

2024-11-26 11:06:53 UTC

The EU is still run by morons unfortunately... https://www.reuters.com/technology/eu-says-bluesky-is-violating-information-disclosure-rules-2024-11-25/

2024-11-21 11:45:39 UTC

Have you tried a therapist? https://image.nostr.build/b941319a25bd7d3b292ddc49ae4ef7345bcb7698915e822877ed2243b7bd474f.jpg

2024-11-20 19:10:24 UTC

- reply

I think you're talking about how they work in the court system. Unfortunately much of the world is run by the kangaroo courts of Google, Apple, Microsoft and Amazon which have very different rules.
E.g. on the topic copyright, having obviously written a book yourself is not enough evidence to get it listed. Once their black box system flags something, you're fucked unless you take them to court or unless you can give them the piece of paper they want.
https://sprovoost.nl/2022/06/01/amazon-and-the-dystopian-future-of-book-censorship/

2024-11-14 12:36:51 UTC

- reply

When nobody is left, there's nothing to censor!

2024-11-13 10:49:25 UTC

The M4 MacBook Pro is not the fastest machine I have, but it's the only one that can sync the blockchain in a few* hours hours without loud fans.
Syncing from the assume utxo snapshot at height 840,000 to the tip took only half an hour. Looking forward to that process becoming more user friendly over time, because it really improves the onboarding experience of a full node. It took me longer to download the torrent from my own slow seed :-)
* = 6.5 hours while doing other stuff, with very large -dbcache

2024-10-18 20:07:55 UTC

- reply

Closing their accounts yes. More specifically, doing so to save money on compliance cost and fines, as opposed to actually caring about preventing money laundering. Which makes total business sense.
Even the #FATF acknowledges this:
https://www.coe.int/en/web/moneyval/implementation/de-risking

2024-10-12 09:50:00 UTC

Rumour has it he's back...

2024-10-12 07:39:12 UTC

- reply

I hope so, there's a Black Mirror episode with exactly this premise.

2024-10-10 20:57:31 UTC

- reply

I agree there can be all sorts of reasons for the attack, but I was responding to the claim / suggestion that it was a deliberate attack on the UN by Israel. That's not a reasonable default assumption. Bad intel or some other misunderstanding is a good default assumption, until evidence shows up to suggest otherwise.
As for IDF investigations: the Dutch air-force accidentally killed 70 civilians in Iraq in 2015. It took almost a decade for that to come out. And because of a whistleblower. It was hidden from Parliament too. Militaries around the world are not known for transparency. So we may indeed never know. But stuff leaks, and whisleblowes are out there.
https://www.amnesty.nl/de-aanval-op-hawija

2024-10-10 15:52:56 UTC

- reply

Press coverage of this war between Israel and various Iran proxies is extremely high, e.g. compared to Saudi Arabia vs. Jemen (also Iran). The fact that a bunch of mortars fired at a UN compound even makes the news is absurd. These things happen in all wars (though usually there's no UN or journalist around to get shot in the first place).
Nobody is complaining that Mexican drug cartels don't allow enough journalists on the battlefield. Of course it's fair to hold a democratic county to the highest possible standard.
I'm sure there's both good and malicious reasons why journalists are not given free
and safe access to this war zone. From the other side I'm skeptical that Hamas and Hezbollah will protect every journalist no matter how critical their reporting.
This creates an asymmetry where anytime Israel allows a journalist in, they will only report on bad things done by Israel because otherwise they're killed. Or they get killed by accident by the IDF. There's no upside. But denying them access also looks bad, and isn't how democracies should behave. Embedded journalists in the IDF would be safe and might reveal bad behavior from the other side, but it would be seen as propaganda. Which it is, but so is Al Jazeera coverage. There's no winning strategy here.
And then of course Netanyahu and/or his zealot buddies will find a way to make things even worse. And because this is the middle east, it's always even more complicated.
From a news consumer point of view the best thing is to probably just wait.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflicts

2024-10-10 14:46:45 UTC

- reply

Presumably they have to reason to believe Hezbollah is using those locations. I don't know how accurate their intel is of course, but neither do most people who comment on this sort of stuff.
Perhaps a more important question is why on Earth the UN is still there. They never stopped Hezbollah. They can't stop Israel either. Seems they're just in the way? But maybe I'm too cynical.

2024-10-10 06:47:11 UTC

- reply

Interesting, added to listen list.
(adding @npub1v5u…n0v5 link so it picks it up, though it would be nice if it understood show pages somehow)
https://fountain.fm/episode/DRf0gvqNkiAmQpjAM4ze

2024-10-05 13:51:48 UTC

Tl&dr: some Dutch traffic lights can be remote controlled via radio signals to give priority for busses and emergency services. This obviously can be hacked, as recently demonstrated by a whitehat.
The plan is gradually replace them with a more modern secure system ... which is connected to the internet.
I'd rather take my chances with local bullies over North Koreans. Anyway, paying attention fixes this :-)
https://nos.nl/artikel/2539694-verouderde-stoplichten-in-nederland-blijken-relatief-makkelijk-te-hacken

2024-10-05 08:28:57 UTC

- reply

You should ask Scottevest to design a large dress with giant pockets. Those don't count as luggage.
https://www.scottevest.com/collections/pants

2024-10-05 08:12:02 UTC

- reply

Ik vind "belasting is diefstal" altijd wat kort door de bocht, maar hier komt een officier van justistie aan het woord die het *niet* betalen van belasting diefstal noemt, lol.
https://fountain.fm/episode/UiqMoa0RSLBZYzrXDS8w

2024-10-05 08:08:41 UTC

Did Musk just get rugged?
https://www.reuters.com/technology/musks-x-seek-resumption-brazil-service-fines-paid-sources-say-2024-10-04/

2024-10-04 14:24:00 UTC

Sad to see The Guardian degrade from opposing the surveillance state to simping for it.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/oct/04/telegram-simplex-far-right

2024-10-03 16:32:11 UTC

- reply

> Supported by vocal advocates like Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk
Musk moved on to Dogecoin years ago. So I guess the documentary is going to be about Craig Wright?
Not holding my breath on this one.

2024-10-03 08:21:30 UTC

- reply

If that had actually happened you wouldn't be around to complain about the incorrect prediction.

2024-10-02 11:38:02 UTC

- reply

For videos and photos you probably want to use a Nostr client that supports Blossom, e.g. Nostrudel.
But since these things are still in development and in flux, you should also just make a big torrent with everything in it. Then you always repost things in more user friendly formats later.

2024-10-01 09:33:43 UTC

The Dutch government released a memo about their stance on #ChatControl
The cabinet is worried about the impact of these measures on fundamental rights, and is not convinced the new "compromise" fix that.
> ... the Cabinet believes that there is currently insufficient clarity about the impact of the proposed measures. The Cabinet's concerns about the protection of fundamental rights at stake, particularly in the area of privacy and the confidentiality of correspondence and telecommunications, and the security of the digital domain have not been sufficiently addressed at this time.
So that's good.
> The cabinet has therefore decided to refrain from taking a position and to actively make this known. The Netherlands will therefore be counted among the countries that do not support the general orientation.
This seems different to me than a no vote, which could be problematic? cc @npub1j97…50h9
There seem to be multiple shades of "no" in EU politics which is thoroughly confusing.
The memo goes into more detail about why they're not happy with the proposal:
> Only with regard to the detection of already known material can such an order be executed in a proportionate manner (via hashing technology). Because the government does not support measures that make end-to-end encryption impossible, the only way in which this order can be executed for end-to-end encrypted services is via client-side scanning. The previous government explicitly communicated with the House that it saw this as an option.
I've said before that I consider the previous Minster of Justice Yeşilgöz a threat to democracy and this confirms that.
The letter continues to explain the new administration initially wanted to continue this positive attitude towards client-side scanning. However it seems the intelligence service AIVD intervened:
> Last week, following a new advice from the AIVD, the position regarding the compromise proposal was reviewed. The AIVD warns that ‘introducing a scan application on every mobile phone with an associated infrastructure of management systems results in an extremely extensive and complex system. This complex system also has access to a large number of mobile devices and the personal data on them. This ultimately results in a situation in which the AIVD considers the risks to digital resilience to be too great.’
"digital resilience" is roughly defined as (different government website):
> the digital resilience of government, companies and social organisations. This concerns the ability to reduce risks to an acceptable level by means of a collection of measures to prevent cyber incidents and, when cyber incidents have occurred, to detect them, limit damage and make recovery easier
The memo continues:
> If a detection order is imposed on a service provider that uses end-to-end encryption, the AIVD estimates that detecting child pornography material through client-side scanning poses too great a security risk to the digital resilience of the Netherlands.
> What is clear is that the security risks mentioned by the AIVD with regard to client-side scanning mean that it is very questionable whether the infringement of fundamental rights can be justified, because with regard to this method there is no proportionate measure.
Quotes are Google translated. ht @npub1xtm…lxd5
https://berthub.eu/tkconv/get/2024D35955

2024-09-28 10:18:06 UTC

- reply

Unfortunately some people would :-)
Well, as long as they come with a transcript...

2024-09-22 15:43:02 UTC

Not sure how much of this is true, but cars having remote surveillance and kill switches is an annoying thing.
It also doesn't strike me as the most practical battle vehicle, but I'm no military expert.
https://youtu.be/HR5OJ1iBjoo

2024-09-21 13:18:09 UTC

- reply

@npub1xts…kk5s any idea why Damus doesn't want to play this? Posted from noStrudel and hosted on my blossom server.
Oh I guess it's because I added .mp4 but that should have been .mov. cc @npub1ye5…knpr would be easier if the client added an extension. https://image.nostr.build/1a8a42e014010d76936638fa9dea95c096de182e03c80ef674501231350ae9cb.jpg

2024-09-21 09:25:45 UTC

Excellent opening line in this mainstream news article:
> Anyone who sends a nude photo via Snapchat often hopes that the image will be seen by a maximum of one pair of eyes. But the EU is considering changing that. #note1kuu…0usx

2024-09-18 19:46:16 UTC

- reply

Oh yes Neo, the "ethereum of China" - except afaik they copied @npub1zfy…m60l 's NBitcoin code with all the original op codes in place (or they ported the script code from Bitcoin Core with comments and all).

2024-09-18 19:16:45 UTC

I already removed my ebook from sale because the tiny number of sales isn't worth the bookkeeping overhead. People can just buy it with Bitcoin from my own site. So I'm sure why I still get this reminder.
That said, what the actual fuck is this about? Is Apple being deliberately obtuse in their communication so everyone hates the #DSA?
https://img.sprovoost.nl/4b0a8f9e6e22c18ace9026db7528aaed40ceb8bcf4924cf498138ef3b792d187.png

2024-09-18 18:08:00 UTC

- reply

For quote reposts you could fold the original down to just one line (if I've already seen it).

2024-09-18 18:06:24 UTC

- reply

Have njump . me be the default share link.
A way to remove all duplicates from my feed (e.g. either only show the original, or only show the most recent boost).
A way to send a legacy like (+) instead of emoji (for Fediverse folks).
NWC "server" (ok that requires running a lightning node, maybe with GreenLight...)
Don't auto replay videos, especially not with audio.
A way to scroll to last unread post, or maybe just a dotted line.
Save draft.
Customize (blossom / nip96) upload service.

2024-09-17 10:41:56 UTC

The blue sky is only two bridges away! Let's see if that works.
> To bridge your fediverse account into Bluesky and interact with people there, search for and follow @bsky.brid.gy@bsky.brid.gy. That account will then follow you back. Accept its follow to make sure your fediverse posts get sent the bridge and make it into Bluesky.
https://fed.brid.gy/docs#fediverse-get-started

2024-09-16 14:27:55 UTC

Or repost of a reply? #note132d…7rfg

2024-09-15 12:06:13 UTC

- reply

Guy

2024-09-15 08:47:06 UTC

I feel like there's always some EU bureaucrat watching this, thinking it's a good idea.
https://youtu.be/itj3Z43QAf8

2024-09-14 19:59:19 UTC

Alright, this personal Fediverse bridge with a patched* @npub1d03…pzfs is promising. But I'll need to debug and improve it more.
1. It seems Mostr stops listening to my relay, or fails to listen at all at startup.
2. Replies from Nostr to Mastodon doesn't seem to work unless you @ the person explicitly, but see *
3. I have to whitelist on my relay every account on Mastodon that I want to follow
4. If someone else on Nostr jumps into a thread it's a mess. They'll only get relayed accross the bridge if either I whitelist them, or I engage them - because then my own client will broadcast it to the relay. But if they then use Mostr proper they'll look like two different people on the mastodon side.
My goal is mainly to get it good enough so I can occasionally reply to people on fediverse instances that block the main mostr bridge.
cc @npub1m93…4fr3
* = attrociously, so most bugs are probably my fault

2024-09-14 19:00:27 UTC

- reply

It does but I don't see it in my notifications tab.

2024-09-11 18:43:23 UTC

- reply

Voskuil explains how an SPV client would validate tx inclusion without 64 byte soft fork.
Looking forward to how future versions of Fountain will handle clip sharing. It's a bit too tedious still. Ideally timestamps in the shownotes are some RSS annotation could automate the process.
https://fountain.fm/clip/6e6xMkP1ilq0JcoohJTI
#bitcoin #consensus

2024-09-11 07:44:21 UTC

Swiss dude gets a 98.500 Frank fine for tailgating. Similarly someone in Finland got a €121.000 fine for speeding.
The problem with these income adjusted fines is privacy. Finland has a central database with everyone's income that cops can apparently just access. It's effectively a kidnap shortlist. Though to be fair, these guys were already flaunting wealth so for them the additional risk is marginal. But everyone is in that database.
https://www.ad.nl/auto/rijke-advocaat-krijgt-boete-van-105-000-euro-voor-bumperkleven-in-zwitserland~afefaaf9/

2024-09-10 14:48:35 UTC

- reply

I'm significantly shorter and can't sleep in economy either.

2024-09-09 09:14:19 UTC

Nice Silent Payments primer by @npub1tg7…cxmt: https://bitbox.swiss/blog/understanding-silent-payments-part-one/

2024-09-08 06:56:42 UTC

- reply

That's called purgery, it's not a Nostr-specific problem.

2024-09-06 12:16:44 UTC

noStrudel map image search using #geohash is pretty cool.
https://img.sprovoost.nl/b347b96acbcb57a9d031ba709e06476e4e24004da4cfc23ce59d29884074daeb.png
@npub1ye5…knpr feature requests:
* a URL with hash should center the map and roughtly zoom in to the right level (that would also fix the back button, which currently jumps me to the USA)
* selecting an image should highlight the map pin (already works the other way around) and not automatically navigate away

2024-09-05 12:12:24 UTC

- reply

I find the article a bit alarmist and pedantic. I don't think it would convince anyone outside our filter bubble, and might even backfire.
Most BBC readers wouldn't understand the distinction between transaction and payment. Using FOIA seems complete overkill.
I don't know why Forbes took it down, that's bad journalistic practice: they can put a notice at the top if they feel there's a serious issue with it. I very much doubt there's anything to it, e.g. I don't think the BBC threatened to sue them. But who knows.
That said, De Vries articles do need debunking, but that should focus on the bigger picture. E.g
1. the fact that it's utterly ridiculous to use water consumption as a metric without any consideration of the local context. Is the miner draining an aquifer that millions of people depend on for drinking water? Or using a giant river?
2. the fact that both "per transaction" and "per payment" are dubious metrics when applied to mining. The energy and water are used to secure the network, that includes but also value at rest.
The water use per transaction can be reduced to a single molecule by a bunch of lightning nodes running on AWS making trillions of transactions in a circle.

2024-09-02 19:50:12 UTC

- reply

Aha, I'll add some cors headers tomorrow. Do you have specific ones in mind? I guess just for your domain?

2024-09-02 15:25:52 UTC

- reply

Though I suppose for now, since the site _only_ shows a README file, I should probably use something like gitea / forgejo / gitlab anyway. And then only use Git Workshop for issue and PR flow.

2024-09-02 14:58:04 UTC

- reply

Perhaps the site can't render the README because it encounters a similar error when cloning?
```
clone --verbose nostr://npub1s6z7hmmx2vud66f3utxd70qem8cwtggx0jgc7gh8pqwz2k8cltuqrdwk4c/instablossom?relayhint=nostr.sprovoost.nl
Cloning into 'instablossom?relayhint=nostr.sprovoost.nl'...
nostr: no updates
WARNING: failed to fetch from git.sprovoost.nl error:cannot fetch a specific object from the remote repository; class=Invalid (3)
and using alternative protocol git@git.sprovoost.nl:instablossom.git: invalid or unknown remote ssh hostkey; class=Ssh (23); code=Certificate (-17)
Error: failed to fetch objects in nostr state event from:
git.sprovoost.nl: cannot fetch a specific object from the remote repository; class=Invalid (3) and using alternative protocol git@git.sprovoost.nl:instablossom.git: invalid or unknown remote ssh hostkey; class=Ssh (23); code=Certificate (-17)
```

2024-09-02 08:23:20 UTC

#ChatControl political brainstorm #note1zva…ldhk

2024-09-02 07:38:10 UTC

@npub1tnp…kkpe do you know if extensions are supposed to work with PWA home screen apps? I can't get it to work with Flockstr, which does work in the regular browser.

2024-09-01 11:03:29 UTC

- reply

I do have most of my Twitter archive, but I'm not sure about posting the whole thing. It's also more difficult because most of the value comes from context like who you reposted or what you replied to.

2024-08-31 21:56:31 UTC

- reply

@npub1gcx…nj5z IIRC Amethyst supports geotags, but I don't see anything in the app for the above picture. It has both g and l tags. But maybe I borked it.
My script uses @npub1uac…99rx's nostr-geotags: https://github.com/sandwichfarm/nostr-geotags