M0053
M0053 (Balakay2b edition)

You've been around long enough to know people get confused. I think... mechanic just wanted to do the right thing.
In the end, judgment by his own hand.

2026-08-28 19:58:04 UTC

- reply

You know it's interesting. I don't think these two ideas are opposed to each other.
Bitcoin becoming a place that is safe for people to store a certain amount of their economic energy is one stone in a series of stones that crosses the river to payments.
But custody is turning out to be a real stumbling block. The more that is fleshed out and solved, the quicker we get to payments, because people will have it. And more people might prefer it over other forms of money.
But until people can feel safe holding it, what makes it better than venmo?

2026-08-28 00:56:09 UTC

I took a risk on word number three.
WORD5 #693 3/6
🟪⬛🟪🟧⬛
🟪⬛🟪⬛🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-26 16:00:36 UTC

- reply

That's great, but shouldn't we focus on what separates us from all the other universities?

2026-08-26 15:06:58 UTC

- reply

Not laughing. 😁

2026-08-25 22:40:08 UTC

- reply

M'lady, maketh not my heart tremble thus again.

2026-08-25 16:06:28 UTC

- reply

I appreciate this very thoughtful and thorough answer. And I agree with most of it. Your simple paragraph of the negative side of the trade-offs monero makes is quite good.
Where I believe we differ is on the current state of Bitcoin and the implicit state of it in the future. I agree Bitcoin is being used for all kinds of tomfoolery and silliness with blocks full of transactions that are out of sync with the purpose for which it was originally developed.
It's interesting, continuing to contrast Monero to Bitcoin, some of the reasons the former has emerged *currently* as a superior transactional money are exactly those same reasons.
Monero is actually being used as transactional money because it is more fungible as well as private. Ordinals on Bitcoin, for example, require a transparent base layer. You couldn't really do those on Monero. Its design makes that impractical if not impossible.
You said Bitcoin is mainly used for speculation. I think that is ignoring the store of value property that Bitcoin is also doing quite well at the moment. People complain that a good store of value is not volatile. But I almost think that's economic propaganda more than truth. Bitcoin is still bootstrapping, and in the last decade and a half its volatility has been diminishing.
I foresee that once Bitcoin has established itself as a trustworthy, worldwide, trust minimized, decentralized asset, that transactional uses will follow naturally. Of course, most of these will not be on the base chain. That has always been true since the moment of Satoshi's first email. But these are just computer science problems. Some solutions already exist.
I believe Bitcoin's transactional use will outbid the spam in the end. And I believe that SOME data on the chain is important for things like transactional systems to be built on top of it. (honestly, I think op_return just being large enough for a a few hashes to be stored is probably enough, but...)
Bitcoin's design originally and with the people who have carried the torch since the beginning has prioritized its continued decentralization over its transactional use. I think this is the right decision.
If Monero's use grows to the point that it is being universally used transactionally, its blockchain will become huge. And it will centralize.
But since we're not there yet with either Monero or Bitcoin, Monero has the advantage.
The reason I'm engaging with you is I have enjoyed your posts ever since I've been reading them and I share a lot of your views. I've also been in the Bitcoin "space" for a long time. I've seen good people branch off into other projects, not chasing after the latest shiny thing, but because they believe there's a mistake being made. Bitcoin Cash and several others frankly. Monero did not start that way, but it ended up there too.
But I think any blockchain-based cryptocurrency is going to face the same problems. And a lot of work has been done on Bitcoin to begin to solve those problems. It is also the clear schelling point in this whole realm.
I agree that parts of Bitcoin's development have been bad choices, particularly recently.
But I also believe we're not going to get another chance at this. And I think we must be careful not to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. As much as I respect Luke Dashjr, I believe that's what he's doing.
Anyway, if you read all this, I appreciate it. And, again, I appreciate your heartfelt, articulate thoughts.

2026-08-24 16:46:54 UTC

- reply

Do you not think that to actually separate money from state you would have to have number go up?
Don't get me wrong. Majoring on that, concentrating on it, making it a pillar of your religious faith in Bitcoin is a mistake.
But the world is not going to use a form of money that does not hold or gain value.
I have been watching Bitcoin for a very long time. In every cycle, there's a new bad guy, a new entity that has captured Bitcoin.
It's been mtgox and China and tether and the banks and the treasury companies and the ETFs and each time we add a new bad guy and drag all the other ones back out of the closet again and parade them around.
I respect your thoughts on this, and I understand where you're coming from. I am not truly a maxi in the sense that I think most people mean. I am a giant Monero fan, for example.
But Bitcoin is for everyone. It's for the people we don't like. It's for the United States government and Iran. It's for the banks. It's for the billionaires. And if it can't survive, those people trying to control it, then we never needed all the bad guys. It was going to fail on its own.

2026-08-23 23:16:15 UTC

- reply

I've always been a fan. It is my favorite wallet. I also quite like the jade. And it's too bad about the ColdCard. It is a fabulous piece of hardware and design in many ways. https://media.jmoose.rocks/440a4f01a41b3fa922df0d9f4473f9f00f0ed7aee7f8bdfa4cf7ad3b573f0135.jpeg

2026-08-23 18:56:20 UTC

- reply

Seems you've answered your own question.

2026-08-23 16:15:44 UTC

- reply

You need an incompetent vice forker?
I'm kind of between stuff right now and might be able to have time to ignore a lot of that sort of thing.
But I'm not even sure what sort of thing, though. So do I need to get my resume to somebody?

2026-08-22 05:16:08 UTC

#Bluewallet is definitely the most underrated mobile Bitcoin wallet.
Open source, very simple interface, yet all kinds of powerful features, fabulous import and export capabilities, multi-sig, coin control. Works with hardware signers including airgapped.
Solid.

2026-08-21 22:07:43 UTC

- reply

Monero Seed detected. I'm pretty sure I see 25 washers. 🤪

2026-08-21 22:03:24 UTC

- reply

Wait, no, you can't leave us hanging like that. What happens after the third one?

2026-08-19 16:49:07 UTC

- reply

It's an interesting question. As someone who has been interested in Monero from the very beginning I am not surprised. For many people like myself who might even call themselves "Bitcoin Maxis"... Monero is the only project that really does something that Bitcoin cannot and should not ever do. An obfuscated base layer is an architectural choice that has tremendous trade-off implications. And just like Bitcoin, in the end, there can really only be one project that successfully takes this path. To this day, Monero is that project.
It may be possible, and frankly I hope it is, that Bitcoin payment layers will eventually offer the same level of fungibility, privacy, and sovereignty that Monero offers on its base layer for the spender. And when that happens, Monero will most likely become much less important.
But until that happens... And you need to be able to send someone value without it being potentially known by anyone on Earth...
There really is currently only one choice.
Monero solves problems that Bitcoin does not even try to solve. They are not competitors, really. And people making some religious war between the two in either direction are really missing the forest for the trees.

2026-08-19 16:03:17 UTC

- reply

... She whispered.

2026-08-17 01:17:04 UTC

- reply

I have no idea what this means, but I like how it sounds.

2026-08-14 04:25:15 UTC

- reply

What does that even mean?

2026-08-13 01:11:06 UTC

- reply

I speculate Samson/JAN3.

2026-08-13 00:07:50 UTC

- reply

If there's a fork all bitcoinners get it.

2026-08-10 03:53:43 UTC

- reply

Black ice dry vape. Cheers to you.

2026-08-09 02:59:00 UTC

This honestly makes me sad.
I have been in Bitcoin almost as long as Luke may be exactly as long.
Luke has been one of the most important contributors to the project from the very beginning.
He has a natural strong bent towards contrarian and adversarial thinking. He tends to believe and act in the extreme.
I believe he cares about what Bitcoin is deeply and probably even sees the project as something that would protect against evil currencies in the digital age.
I agree with him on so many parts of why he is fighting.
This is not a minor loss to Bitcoin.
But Bitcoin is not about one guy.
Sigh.
#nevent1q…fkrj

2026-08-08 15:25:21 UTC

- reply

Wine is one of the best paid relays (more than one). I used it for a couple years myself. But I also run my own relay nowadays and have for over a year as well. And it is certainly possible to have a small number of relays that give you reliable, good service.
You are absolutely welcome to use my relay without any charge, although I guarantee nothing. It has been working quite well for some time now.
The only catch is I have it down temporarily since it shares the same mechanical drive as my blockchain and fulcrum instances. And fulcrum is finally in the 90th percent range of sinking, so in the next day or so, I'll be bringing the relay back up. Like I said, feel free to use it. Maybe it will help.
relay.jmoose.rocks
(again, I expect it to be back up and responding within the next 24 or 36 hours, I imagine. Also, it's in Helsinki, so depending on where you are in the earth, you may have a few milliseconds of latency. 🤪)

2026-08-08 13:26:35 UTC

- reply

You are welcome!

2026-08-08 03:41:23 UTC

- reply

Tempests in a teapot.

2026-08-08 03:31:39 UTC

- reply

2026-08-07 15:39:41 UTC

#bip110 #knots #core
So the coinkite thing sucked up on my attention.
Where we at on the signaling thing? Are there two bitcoins yet?

2026-08-06 19:47:22 UTC

#coldcard #hack #entropy #sad
#CoinKite cannot come back from this.
Even if they could rebuild the lost trust the company AND principals (due to negligence piercing the LLC/corporate protections) are going to be sued into oblivion.
The only HONORABLE move @nvk and @coinkite can do is simple:
They should FULLY make both the hardware and software 100% open source. This would allow the community to rescue the existing devices and project from being useless.
This is also the most effective, if not only way for the people behind this debacle to regain a small amount of respect in the community.
And... It is right.
Not holding my breath... I assume the lawyers and liquidators will be running the show soon.

2026-08-06 05:25:42 UTC

- reply

I'm nobody. New to this bitcoin thing.
As to the statement. I saw remorse. Not rooting for him. He made his bed.

2026-08-06 05:23:43 UTC

- reply

Lol. I'm no one. New to bitcoin. Nyknyc.

2026-08-06 04:31:50 UTC

- reply

He did apologize. In a statement.

2026-08-06 04:31:14 UTC

- reply

In the US this would easily be ruled negligence which will pierce the protections from the LLC or corporation.
Not sure aboot Canada.

2026-08-06 01:27:16 UTC

- reply

After watching Jameson Lopp mock his customer base, it became easy for me to strike this company from my list. I will never do business with a company with a founder who makes fun of the people who would be his customers.
Some of us will not forget.
There are other companies that do this same kind of job, but are led by people who have respect for others.
I suggest that anyone interested in forging a business relationship with a company that's doing something as important as helping them custody their Bitcoin should make sure that they're comfortable with the people leading it. To be honest, I think we've seen enough of what that kind of leadership begets even in recent days.
Hard no from me.

2026-08-06 00:30:56 UTC

- reply

Make sure to stab them in the eyeballs.

2026-08-05 05:25:52 UTC

- reply

I will be glad for that. I did just shut it down for a brief moment as I'm letting fulcrum finish building its database. It's been up pretty much nonstop for over a year though. It stays up until just tonight when I decided to turn it off right after telling people about it.🤪

2026-08-05 01:19:16 UTC

I run a little #nostr #relay on the other side of the earth from me. If you happen to be near Helsinki it might be a snappy one for you!
relay.jmoose.rocks
Feel free to use it. My logs are rotated and purged frequently.

2026-08-04 17:26:58 UTC

Oh, good grief. The more information that comes out about what went down with this, the more incredible it begins to seem.
And when I say incredible, I mean that word very literally.
#nevent1q…jucq

2026-08-04 16:55:43 UTC

I want to say this is an extreme take and it is really, but it sure resonates right now.
At the same time, I want to know where the line is between scams, mistakes, grifters, even ones who don't know they're more or less one of those things and people just using a tool.
You could say the same thing about who gets to drive a car or who gets to use a gun. In fact, people do. And I'm not sure if we're attacking the right thing or the wrong thing in a situation like this.
But it is worth dedicating serious thought to.
#nevent1q…x7cq

2026-08-03 18:37:10 UTC

This is it.
This is the postmortem.
We may learn other details here and there, but in my opinion, you can throw out any conspiracy theory or any wild idea of state attacks until they can be proven to the extent that they disprove this Occam's razor truth.
Please read this.
And thanks, Max. Good job.
#naddr1qq…9acl

2026-08-03 00:36:40 UTC

- reply

Yeah, and I think there's probably lots and lots of people on here that are ready for it. It's not like you got to be in a special club, but I could just see some of the less technical people tripping over some scary stuff and then not being able to find what they do with their Bitcoin.
I do think Craig the developer has added some more warnings and such in certain areas.

2026-08-03 00:27:57 UTC

- reply

Dat case doh...

2026-08-02 23:49:42 UTC

- reply

He's probably asking himself that about now.

2026-08-02 23:47:27 UTC

- reply

3 then.

2026-08-02 23:45:36 UTC

- reply

I'm sure the lawyers have a much longer list than this one little bit.
They've got to get ahead of stuff because there's some pretty nasty shit comin down the pipe for some people.

2026-08-02 23:44:00 UTC

- reply

I really dislike that doofus.
But when you're right you're right.

2026-08-02 23:41:43 UTC

- reply

The oof keeps coming. Lol.

2026-08-02 23:39:05 UTC

- reply

I wouldn't be surprised if it's something that a lawyer suggested.
I expect we'll be seeing other sorts of announcements from various corners.
Big shit is coming for some people. They're gonna have to get ahead of it.

2026-08-02 23:38:03 UTC

- reply

By the way, one reason I posted this and believe it is true is after the update I saw a Q crash just last night.

2026-08-02 23:34:39 UTC

I have been seeing #Sparrow wallet mentioned a lot for use in recovery and for ordinary users to download so they can move coins to a hot wallet, etc.
First of all, let me say this is my favorite Bitcoin wallet.
But it's actually very similar to the Coldcard in that it is an extremely complex piece of software. When you're making your wallet, you can choose derivation paths, for example.
Sparrow really is for the passionate and the power users.
Perhaps someone else knows a easier to use wallet that runs on Windows and Mac.
Something like Blue Wallet may be good for a temporary hot wallet. @bluewallet
https://bluewallet.io/

2026-08-02 22:52:29 UTC

- reply

In my opinion, it looks delicious. But then again, that's coming from a guy who, everything he makes, he calls slop. So, it's a pretty low bar, I guess. But I bet it's tasty.

2026-08-02 22:49:49 UTC

#coldcard #sad #rng
With the number space being so small, it was probably just a matter of time before we would have seen collisions.
I wonder if some of the reports of very early losses may have been collisions by someone who just won the lottery so to speak... kind of a terrible lottery for the other person.

2026-08-02 22:07:05 UTC

- reply

Why would they destroy the products of the big is in the software.
Yes I understands why they'd stop selling them at least temporarily, and may never be able to sell them again, particularly with the premium price etc.
But why destroy?
Emotions are high. Maybe that's it.

2026-08-02 13:54:16 UTC

Now there are mounting reports that the patched devices are breaking themselves.
https://x.com/i/status/2083633778572787862

2026-08-02 06:12:58 UTC

- reply

I'll buy one off anyone (without the counter run up) for 33k sats. mk4 I'll do 15k. You pay postage.

2026-07-31 21:36:29 UTC

- reply

To say it another way, you might as well do all your calculations on the air-gapped device. You don't gain security by splitting it up.

2026-07-31 21:35:27 UTC

- reply

Well, that's an interesting question. Navigating the checksum word is not difficult if the other 23 words are in the hardware device, then it's not wrong to allow it to do the checksum. I think there's only 12 of those possible for a 24-word seed. So if you've got 23 words, it's going to be easy to find the money.
And though using air-gapped hardware to do calculations is close to best practices, it also has its own set of risks. A lot of people who might think they know what they're doing, they're don't and could end up in trouble.

2026-07-31 20:24:59 UTC

- reply

100 dice rolls is almost certainly safe. In that situation, you're just trusting that the algorithms on the device that interpret the dice rolls into your private key are not borked. The situation in which that would be vulnerable is if the code that does the conversion converts into a limited set of private keys, which would be a similar problem, but there is no random number generator involved with that process, or at least shouldn't be. Well, technically, the only place there might be random number generator input would be for the checksum word, word number 12 or 24.
Also, I wouldn't do any of that until the firmware was all the way upgraded.
In my opinion, the hardware is still what it always was. It's good hardware. I don't trust any hardware with making the seed phrase. I've always made them manually.

2026-07-31 19:28:36 UTC

- reply

Chances are pretty good he's going to be forced to do whatever the lawyers say.

2026-07-31 05:05:07 UTC

- reply

"Saved" by a little roll your own cryptography.
This is nasty af.
I learned to make seeds before there were HD wallets. And I use a cup with 32 quarters in it and a pencil. Lol.

2026-07-31 04:16:03 UTC

- reply

Your entropy is still reduced, but the number of possible combinations is increased.
IOW, you all suffer from the fact the pool of private keys is (MUCH) more limited. But to move funds you'd need the right combination of three of them. (2 xprvs and all three xpubs).
You are safer, but if I were in your shoes I'd CAREFULLY move the coins. A Bip 39 passphrase helps quite a bit but is one more way to complicate and therefore shoot self in foot. 😁 whatever you do take care to do it well.

2026-07-31 04:04:19 UTC

Pride goes before destruction,
and a haughty spirit before a fall.
#rng #entropy #haughtiness

2026-07-31 03:16:13 UTC

- reply

Some of these people combing the code, as you say, will next be combing through likely addresses.
It looks as if entropy was severely reduced.
In my opinion, if someone reading this produced their private key via the cold card, they should not trust that private key.
Whatever the extent of this issue, the way that an exploit can work is by narrowing down the possible private keys because of the busted entropy.
But Evans, advice here to take your time and be calm and careful is of paramount importance. It is probably more likely to shoot oneself in the foot than it is to have your keys guessed.

2026-07-31 03:11:46 UTC

- reply

WORD5 #665 5/6
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟪⬛⬛
🟧⬛🟪⬛⬛
🟧⬛🟪🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/
Ya beat me!

2026-07-29 18:00:58 UTC

- reply

Okay, I think this post makes me need to go read hodlnauts publishings.
I've been running knots for a year, and I did signal for BIP 110 by default for a while. But I've dropped back down to Core 29.
I do not support ending up in a hard fork over this particular topic at this point. Period. And I do not see how this path does not end up there with a minority chain.
But I am constantly trying to sharpen my understandings of the situation.
I have heard a lot of stupid garbage from both ends of the argument, and I've heard some good concise points.
But like I said, I will go look up what Bitcoin's old friend was having to say about it.

2026-07-26 14:18:19 UTC

https://npub1qktjyk0vdqlfss7wztawdnka5phx2p3vlvq50x0z402jk2fjhtnqlx9qas.blossom.band/7ca75d21a2b221101271fcba5ed1559f308b98d5ba78dfb924b08f282d8b9bcd.jpg

2026-07-24 22:47:44 UTC

The next time you listen to @nprofile…zslp and @nprofile…qy52 I want you to imagine them this way.
If you are old enough to understand it... you will never recover. ;)
https://image.nostr.build/de75bb6fab4565f1dcebde16697152da65d9edad4390c12f1d5b8acdf72376f9.png

2026-07-24 21:16:20 UTC

- reply

Woo
WORD5 #658 3/6
⬛🟧⬛🟧⬛
🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-07-22 02:43:16 UTC

- reply

WORD5 #656 4/6
⬛🟪⬛⬛⬛
🟧🟪⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟪⬛🟧⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-07-22 01:09:32 UTC

- reply

It's sad. I think I have been one of the biggest fans of the Jade. I've always enjoyed the way that they handle security and the private key.
But I have to admit, a lot of the drama that's happened over the last year or two has sort of soured me on supporting businesses who call a certain percentage of their potential customers stupid over and over again online.
As a well-meaning Bitcoiner who's not very political or drama-focused it just tastes bad.
Not sure if it will actually have an impact outside of me as a customer, but maybe something to think about.

2026-07-19 21:57:53 UTC

Sportsball...

2026-07-18 15:18:53 UTC

- reply

There's no way those guys don't want pineapple on there too.

2026-07-14 01:43:14 UTC

- reply

Why is that, dude? 😁

2026-07-12 22:22:46 UTC

- reply

I haven't actually decided that yet, but I'm leaning towards just using better hardware and definitely not putting off the mirror this time. I have a little nuc that would make a fabulous node. It even has two NVMe slots so I'm pretty sure I can mirror it up right away. I just have to spend a lot of money on drives.

2026-07-12 21:21:30 UTC

- reply

Tragedy of the Commons.

2026-07-12 20:43:02 UTC

- reply

Hardware failure. But also failure on my part in that I kept procrastinating mirroring the drive.

2026-07-12 20:42:14 UTC

- reply

Well, it was a drive failure, and the static channel backups were what enabled me to claim the SATs. That, and honest channel partners. But the node was run in a physical proximity to me on my hardware. The rescue happened on a VPS in Europe.

2026-07-12 17:13:00 UTC

They say pride comes before a fall. Well, I was proud of myself finally getting my lightning address working on my domain with a little software that could reach out to my node and create invoices blah blah. And as soon as that was working for less than a week, Kblamo, my lightning node disintegrated.
This is that story.
#nevent1q…3mx5

2026-07-12 16:56:11 UTC

- reply

I did not speak of the carnivorous diet. Are you a bot or just...

2026-07-11 22:31:36 UTC

- reply

I have been telling my elderly best friend frequently, that I'm impressed with him, that he has protected my whole family from that devilish, demonic mailman. The mailman who has not one time slipped in through the mail slot and killed all of us. The good boy is undefeated.

2026-07-11 22:23:44 UTC

- reply

Yum.

2026-07-11 21:49:02 UTC

- reply

OK! I came around to actually doing this: nevent1qqs8cz8z0cj93k4sxafd0972age4hjwv8a4yt9mp44kfy85vm0w4qwspqqpzqpvhyfv7c6p7nppuuyh6um8dmgrwv5rze7cpg7v792749v5n9whxqvzqqqqqqyq59sr2

2026-07-11 21:48:18 UTC

M0053TALK #1!
The first and only episode of a podcast that does not exist!
In this episode I talk about what I did when I realized my lightning node was a goner...
...but with lots of pontifications!
https://nostr.download/93fb03b3c07f113ab139a305e109f804fcf37e4d3dba237e58a6df7b23bd3438.mpga

2026-07-10 14:23:08 UTC

- reply

Tail =200mph
Face =classic pitful beg face
I say that is a good dog. All dog systems go.

2026-07-10 05:52:50 UTC

But I tell you the truth, no prophet is accepted in his own hometown.

2026-07-10 02:21:57 UTC

- reply

Just be aware you dox your IP when you do that. May or may not be something to consider.

2026-07-10 00:06:00 UTC

- reply

Well, his absence created a "vacuum for grifters". We couldn't "stay humble" without him guarding us from grifters over there.
I have respect for Mr. Odell, but he is a black and white idealist who trips over his perfectionism dick frequently.
And he's arguing with someone who's even more of a binary thinker than himself.
You will notice that Luke achuallly never said bitcoinners would be pedos. Rather that they would be forced to distribute CSAM. So, as a binary thinker, he also feels compelled to shout liar.
If Bitcoin can't survive this, then it could never have survived in the first place. Also, unfortunately, I think it's inevitable that at some point we're going to see a fork and the whole world's going to freak out and the people who were here in 2017 will be saying hang tight, hang tight. It's going to be gross. This might not be that event, but we're eventually gonna see it.

2026-07-08 19:54:04 UTC

I am waxing VERY philosophical today and want to record my ideas and let you hear them. If I do this will at least on e of you listen? And promise not to make fun of my voice? :) 🫎

2026-07-06 18:24:19 UTC

- reply

Ooh. Spicy gamja

2026-07-04 12:42:05 UTC

- reply

Ah-ha! Well the btc/ln node itself is run on minimal hardware sitting on a local network I have access to.
But the invoice generation is handled by LnBits on a VPS (5250 miles away) connecting via a VPN tunnel to the node.
This seems like a fairly secure architecture. I actually started out with zerotier as the VPN and then went to a vanilla wire guard setup. But honestly, I think even zero tier should be pretty good, since traffic is encrypted.

2026-07-03 19:12:04 UTC

- reply

I'm still curious about the zap receipts thing. What were you meaning? Because I might want to turn that on, whatever it is.

2026-07-03 19:02:00 UTC

- reply

Can I join the call too and just take notes so I feel like I'm a dev?

2026-07-02 01:30:02 UTC

- reply

Think goodness AI can't just start putting a face up in the corner too now?

2026-07-02 01:27:48 UTC

- reply

You know, I think that word has lost its meaning in the Bitcoin community.

2026-07-01 17:36:51 UTC

- reply

I don't know who you are, but welcome to my ban list.

2026-07-01 16:03:29 UTC

- reply

Cool. Well, I also sent you a couple zaps in return, but Amethyst isn't showing them. It's funny, I never used to have problems with that, but over the last six months or so, it's just real spotty whether or not I see them show up on posts.
I'm not a big zapper (or someone who expects big zaps) anyway. I'm just trying to get everything set up neatly. 😁

2026-07-01 06:42:10 UTC

- reply

Wait... Aminorex?

2026-07-01 05:26:37 UTC

(ó﹏ò｡)
#nevent1q…uqfc

2026-07-01 04:31:04 UTC

- reply

Hmm. Appreciate the try. Could just be my gimpy node.