wakoinc
Blake

#Bitcoin #Nostr #Freedom wss://relay.nostrgraph.net

Public Key

npub1ktw5qzt7f5ztrft0kwm9lsw34tef9xknplvy936ddzuepp6yf9dsjrmrvj

NIP-05 Address

_@wako.ws

Profile Code

nprofile1qqst9h2qp9ly6p9354hm8djlc8g64u5jntfslkzzcaxk3wvssazyjkcpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qg3waehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5hsywjgly

Publishing to

eden.nostr.land

nostr.wine

e.nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1ktw5qzt7f5ztrft0kwm9lsw34tef9xknplvy936ddzuepp6yf9dsjrmrvj

Show more details

Last Notes

2023-08-20 15:55:47

Power corrupts. Unless it’s powering #Bitcoin.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/argentina-government-imf-had-wanted-100-peso-devaluation-2023-08-17/

2023-08-09 15:52:04

https://twitter.com/romoolo/status/1689119185110990848

2023-07-26 14:24:59

WorldCoin: Where finding dead bodies or killing people unlocks all their wealth for instant transfers for bounty hunters. Modern treasure hunting!! What a time to be alive.

2023-07-22 16:24:04

- reply

My main concern overall is really the white washing of what security you are actually getting, and what you are not as a user. When people can’t understand easily, they may think they have privacy and live in a sane world… when…
End to end used to mean best possible outcome (assuming the keys used were a sound curve) - and sadly today it’s entirely possible for ‘end to end’ to be something else entirely.
The extent of the scam used to (and often still is,) be SSL Certificate providers attaching ‘$500,000 encryption insurance’ as part of their sold certificates. A bogus un-claimable feature used for marketing and to trick untechnical users into thinking they were highly secure and safe to use their credit card online (this is largely pre the HTTPS push).
Cloudflare are certainly innovators - but in a very centralising way. Their business moat is tied to protecting and growing their centralised empire. Just like any other company, they can be coerced as a business to do a governments bidding.
I’d almost go as far as marking websites or services that use Cloudflare as not a green lock or add a yellow spy glass - but really, browsers are too broken now, best to instead focus on their replacement.

2023-07-22 07:35:44

Discussions online typically live elsewhere to their primary source today.
A few reasons why include who controls the primary source, how long it may be around, where/who hosts the primary content, and in what context is the discussion happening - perhaps different aspects/threads are of interest to different groups.
With Nostr the primary content isn’t tied to a primary host or controller/moderator. It’s a published referential event.
Discussions can occur directly in the same ecosystem. No need for bespoke external platforms comment sections like news articles, blogs, discord, forums, hacker news, etc. to host commentary themselves; the content and discussion can co-exist. That’s a truely unique and ultimately the winning model.
What will still need development is how to ingest or navigate or collate or filter or ingest the discussions - as it’s now lumped into a single pool of inter-referencing discussion.
One approach is to skin the discussion into views and effectively rebuild those external platform discussions directly on top of Nostr - tweaking views to suit. Other approaches will develop over time.

2023-07-21 19:05:51

Reminder: Cloudflare is a man in the middle, and decrypts all traffic and re-encrypts it using it’s own certificate.
Sometimes this is ok, for example Nostr events are effectively public, and relays can prevent DDOS. However it’s important to understand that the green certificate saying valid cert and encrypted in browsers does not mean private or 100% secure or true end-to-end without ease dropping.
Their ‘malware detection’ capability is more likely there for dual purpose surveillance. If you mature and roll out systems that mass spy on your population, flipping the switch from passive to active is easy.
If I was the government, I’d pay for a few (secret) contracts.

2023-07-21 17:41:47

- reply

My issue is they make the devices and OS. And I’m not sure we should (read: please don’t) trust apps directly, to be honest, as they are a target vector.
External signing devices are great. What’s missing is a layer perhaps where the external signing device says, “hey, your last message to Dave was to pubkey X, it’s now Y” or similar - however I favour dumb signing devices.
A trusted OS would be ideal to perhaps have this security layer to keep/compare state and make it obvious/transparent - it’s just painful that we can’t trust the OS.

2023-07-21 12:55:18

- reply

And just to clarify.. you’d need the pinned certificate key/fingerprint - it’s expiry is not enough to detect a change.

2023-07-21 12:53:42

- reply

Not talking strictly HTTPS. Even so, when have you been directly notified by an app when they updated their pinned certificate? Or even having visibility to a currently pinned certificate and it’s expiry?
It’s not even the key exchange exchange security - that’s largely solved. It’s the swap out and zero-visibility attacks.
I’m largely targeting WhatsApp, Apple iMessages and FaceTime, and whatever large corp constant use a few buzz words that are literally meaningless.
I hope we can do better on Nostr, once key rotation is more mature. We need greater transparency around security related changes. I’m unsure how to include them outside of the app itself - which shouldn’t be trusted.

2023-07-21 12:38:26

- reply

Nice*

2023-07-21 12:37:32

“End to End Encryption” is just marketing without having significant and deliberate tampering detection mechanism.
Examples include secretly swapping out a certificate/key for an identity to middlemen, private key leakage, changes in code to specific safety checks or tampering protection mechanisms, or changes in forward secrecy pre-generated keys, etc.
It would be nice if we had a way to better detect these types of changes and make it very obvious to the identity. As they happen and as part of updates. It would be nose to have a trusted host OS that could help validate.

2023-07-21 11:46:31

People seem to assume a single AGI. I’d expect multiple. And for them each to be their greatest enemy.. not humans.
That’s way off. What isn’t is ML used to manipulate humans - with greater control and less effort than current manipulators (media, propaganda, studies, social, etc).
To change culture you need to bring open people into a new established culture — or..
You need a journey of 10,000 smaller ‘truths’ that you lead people on a journey of acceptance to assimilate them. Some adopt sooner than others.
Governments and media - and more recently ’social groups/media’ - have learned this. It’s why history can be rewritten, maps changed, schools curriculum updated, people can believe they will die from something that is statically very rare, and this time will be different or better.. that ‘they’ (in power) learned a lesson or something; or worse, know what they are doing.
The risk of technology is always abuse. And the role of government is to remain in power at all costs.
Control culture and you control the near-term future.

2023-07-20 11:07:52

Australia has 65,000 police officers. Many are murderers.
Per 100,000 population, it wouldn’t be hard to argue (I have no hard data to share), that there are more murders per 100,000 in the active police force than the general population. What a successful institution - and one wonders why people fear and mistrust the police?
https://www.itv.com/news/2023-07-20/officer-who-tasered-95-year-old-allegedly-said-bugger-it-before-firing

2023-07-19 16:37:20

- reply

The secondary reason is timing. And it aligns how funny things happen when the value of $1/1£/1€ in a currency drops below a certain threshold.
A $1 cheeseburger becomes $2. Then $3.50, followed by $5.50.
Instead of the population doing math in fractions of a whole unit - a dollar/euro/etc, suddenly they are doing math without decimals to interpret somethings cost/cheapness.
It’s a huge shock to the brain when this happens as the difference between $0.25 and $.50, and then $1 and $2 are the same %, yet perceived as different.
The USD, Euro, Pound, AUD, NZD, etc are all recently breakaway from decimals (cents) mattering. Cents have become rounding units and insignificant.

2023-07-19 16:29:41

- reply

At the time I naively expected this global government spending to balance out - if all countries roughly spend the same GDP to pay for these Covid-made decisions.
What I didn’t appreciate then, that I do now, is that while some countries fair better post Covid than others relatively, but in a negligible way (ultimately there were no clear winners,) is just how much they would kick off true runaway inflation.
I find it hard to see how this isn’t a state that persists for the next years, perhaps beyond, and ultimately the final straw for ‘controlling’ fiat.

2023-07-19 16:19:42

- reply

While some recent government spending was costs tied to Covid (the virus itself), the majority was tied to bad policy, lockdowns, propping up their broken economy (due to lockdowns), paying for vaccines, and funding military conflicts.
This is all taken out of the countries GDP - possible financial growth. It’s not paid for and it’s debt that that will last decades and inflation that hides who is paying for everything. Taxes aren’t funding this. They were already spent and allocated in budgets.
A decrease in your wealth is funding these bad decisions, mismanagement, and the consequences they had. The same story is happening (largely) globally.

2023-07-19 16:13:02

It’s important to understand that a small decrease in inflation _growth_ doesn’t mean a reduction in current or future prices compared to the previous value of money. It just means it’s not getting as bad as fast (alleged deceleration) - by that metric which is most certainly gamed and inaccurate.
Prices will never return to previous values. That’s how inflation works and run away inflation takes off.
https://twitter.com/ITVNewsPolitics/status/1681686884714414081?s=20

2023-07-19 12:56:57

The reason why large corporate fines don’t work, is because the legal cost to fight them is a fraction of a potential fine halving the amount or the delayed payment value for decades that decreases its real cost.
Simply put, larger and larger fines do not work to prevent or disincentivise behaviours that in the current system are punished by court settled damages and fines. The cost to fight damages legally is far far smaller than the likely savings by fighting. (E.g a $5B fine can become $2.5B with a 20 year delay on payment, with legal costs far below that).
Why does this matter, it’s means there is a practical cap on how large fines can effectively become and we’ve hit it. It means that legal costs are much much smaller than the cost to not fight large fines - effectively making the original fines worth far far less than intended - and hence the actual punishment far far less significant.
We will need another mechanism to replace or augment fines if we actually intend to have a mechanism to punish bad actors (corporations). Fines alone are broken. Limiting ability to sell product, criminal liability, forced company shutdowns/split-ups/receiverships, etc are all possible extensions. I don’t have an opinion on best approaches as yet.

2023-07-17 16:37:15

- reply

Thanks. I’ll have a listen.
I’d wager our ‘aging population’ isn’t a root cause problem either, and instead a reflection of our inability to build efficient systems that scale. Intuitively, having more, greater experienced people, should result in accelerated innovation and efficiency - we are going the reverse.
We’ve failed to leverage efficiency at scale (outside of capitalism), while dawdling at managing population growth and increases consumption. Recycling is one such great fail - and it continues to be a joke - we don’t even design for it or have strategies.

2023-07-15 09:14:04

- reply

Thanks for recommending. Solid discussion around the topic.

2023-07-14 17:18:02

- reply

Matador: A Bitcoin-Powered (Lightning API) Passthrough Server

2023-07-14 17:17:19

https://github.com/Kodylow/matador

2023-07-13 09:14:20

What has truly stagnated is our ability to propose and collaborate on new and better systems - new political, governmental, financial, social, etc. the broken ones hold fast to protect themselves like a fortifying parasite, while the competition dies out or trails it’s ability to ‘catch up’ - it’s too slow.
Definitely progress on the fringes and in small pockets - yet it’s worth pondering for a while why the above happened and what’s next?
I link it to broken systems where incentives are wrong and bad entities have armour and too big to fail properties, the fact the system’s own protection mechanism largely sits on top of being too large + complex + intertwined for any alternative approach’s adoption strategy to be cost or time effective.
Coupled with a significant over bloated legal system that makes much of what could be innovated gray or illegal - an example being private communities and roadblocks to their experimentation and existence.
My pain point is the effort and time to exhaust these horribly conceived systems is now a frame of centuries - when it could (read: should) be decades. During the past few hundred years - it was only decades… and we’ve since built a nightmare that refuses to evolve.

2023-07-12 19:13:42

Have global bio-labs tightened access and security / contamination procedures - and ideally reporting of accidents or early reports of contamination leaks?
A sane modern journalistic system would be focusing on monitoring this non-stop until results - regardless of if Covid was a lab leak… we obviously need controls due to the very obvious risks of playing with fire.

2023-07-11 16:28:52

“Our main new result is to show how to securely combine the techniques used in FROST and SPRINT, allowing one to build a threshold Schnorr signing protocol that (i) is secure and robust without synchrony assumptions (like SPRINT), (ii) provides security even with an unlimited number of presignatures, and (assuming unused presignatures are available) signing requests can be processed concurrently with minimal latency (like FROST), (iii) achieves high throughput (like SPRINT), and (iv) achieves optimal resilience.”
https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1019

2023-07-11 16:23:35

- reply

Introducing the new Phoenix, a 3rd generation self-custodial Lightning wallet.
Splicing changes the game: single dynamic channel, no more 1% fee on inbound liquidity, better predictability and control, trustless swaps.

2023-07-11 16:17:01

https://acinq.co/blog/phoenix-splicing-update

2023-07-08 21:33:10

Fiat: The balloon 🎈 economy circa 1900/2000.

2023-07-08 21:30:51

- reply

Zap who?

2023-07-07 20:40:50

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL8CIZej19o

2023-07-07 18:19:18

When a company tells you how and what to share on their centralised platform… don’t waste your time. #note1r7j…5dz0

2023-07-07 10:20:16

Same monkeys, different zoo. #note1zeq…ahjv

2023-07-05 20:47:02

The internet is already the metaverse.
The more we rely on it, the more reality and the metaverse become the same thing.
Some kind of visual projection (headset) is only a layer on top - it’s a new UI/UX for the the exact same metaverse.

2023-07-05 20:37:50

- reply

A counter point could be that we can just use machines / ML for good or to identify these types of attacks.
However there is an economic issue - what’s the monetary incentive to fund the automated identification, and secondly any automated identification will be biased and be statistical probability - no real difference to social feed algorithms.
I’m unsure if even you control your own ML modelling it will be suitable.. perhaps it could work for some time as portable compute and local personal ML models shrink.

2023-07-05 18:45:59

- reply

If I look at my LinkedIn today, I’d wager 20% bots. Twitter none as I stopped using it - likely similar.
I think a single verification weak link is best case, and dozens is more reality. My Nostr network reach is 20,000 (2nd degree) and my 2nd degree following is 7,000. Each of those have their own 10,000s of possible weak links.
For small networks like Scuba Divers Egypt, sure, it can work. For larger social networks it would seem unlikely to work - especially when it can happen over months or even years - computers have infinite patients.
It the root issue is still that I can be impacted so significantly by mis-steps from my trusted network. And the ability to climb a network trust is actually very trivial if it has incentives.
Think of a Google maps business that gives a small gift and asks for 5 stars for a special discount or photos of your activity. It can all be gamed - and trust ranks breached by manipulation. NPS is also easily manipulated by businesses when they have KPIs and bonuses tied to them.

2023-07-05 18:45:58

- reply

2023-07-05 18:45:57

- reply

2023-07-05 18:36:11

- reply

I’m not suggesting KYC or human verification.
I’m suggesting that we need to add a cost for machines to increase the expense of computer generated content - however humans would also have to incur that same cost - however at scale, humans post less and have an order of magnitude less expensive.
Or another solution. I don’t have a clear picture of exactly what will work best.

2023-07-05 18:32:50

- reply

The expense will down trend for cost and power of machines and thus content. Human brains however are effectively stable and have physical limits that aren’t increasing.
I can imagine even with a 10% hit rate, perhaps using public records like birth certificates or similar, there will still be economical benefit for the bots/targeted ML. Whatever a human can do in the digital world, a simulation can do better, faster, and cheaper.
I’ve read and appreciate brugeman’s approach and research. Spam typically always has a call to action - however when you can instead hyper-target, again it’s death by 1,000 cuts.. most or all don’t have a link or product they are trying to sell you. It will be selling instead a way of thinking, a reality that is one they benefit from (they being whoever breaks even or makes money).
I have a Nostr relay too and my spam ML engine hasn’t been updated in training for 5 months now. It has 99.999% accuracy or abouts. Spam is different from targeted content.
Consider a Wikipedia page with two versions and one promotes euthanasia in the death section for suicides and the other condemns and highlights doctors are mass murders. Imagine Wikipedia shows you the version it wants you to side with. It’s very different problem from spam detection.

2023-07-05 18:18:52

- reply

Well said. I think we’re always being influenced or manipulated in a way. The new adjustment is by just how much and just how hard it will be to identify using human cognition (or even research).
Brains are limited in power and time - biology is slow. We’re crossing that biological limit this decade.

2023-07-05 18:15:35

- reply

Some good thoughts.
Perhaps a similar approach is staked Bitcoin (why similar? It adds a cost) that doesn’t move could be used. However there would then be a market selling UTXOs of hodlers. Even renting this would be 10-100x cheaper than buying that Bitcoin.
The issue with web of trust is that your weakest link is always the easiest route. Computers don’t care if it takes months to progress. And the next issue is even closed/small highly verified networks don’t cater for the wider audience social media we largely use today. What if it was your grandma who trusted the bad actor? Bye grandma?
The next issue is just like world coin using eye balls to ‘verify humans’, people will sell their human verification - or identities of the dead get to live again.

2023-07-05 17:40:43

- reply

1+ 7 == 42

2023-07-05 17:40:12

- reply

Another critical attack is the same as above, however once they have a significant portion of your content you see daily - they bait and switch.
This attack is malicious too, as now all those environmental people you follow and listen to, the profiles have flipped and are now either harassing you directly - or, pitching you content to swing your opinion, like nuclear is bad and coal can be clean.
It doesn’t have to be a hard cut over either. It can be over time and more sneaky.
Anyway.. online and social is about to become 1,000,000+ to 1 machines to humans - and since text content doesn’t help machines, the content the machines spit out will solely be to control you with alternative motives - run by other humans.

2023-07-05 17:34:05

- reply

The information you now ingest can be targeted and malicious - yet hidden and subliminal. You have let your guard down and you are now suckling the teet of deception and malicious. A botnet 2.0 targeting individuals instead of network congestion.
You’ve been infiltrated. Your web of trust network has been corrupted. You are both a victim and pawn.
I’ve not only just described online advertising today, Reddit and Twitter, but the hyper-targeted content that’s coming. We currently have no clear defence - technical, social, biological or legal.
Governments seem to think laws against ‘misinformation’ prevent this. They do not. They will fail - if not only for the fact definitions of misinformation vary by content and individual, and government moderation or censorship is doomed to be rejected.
How do I know this is possible - because with patients (and a lack of morals), I could build this. If I can, someone else can.

2023-07-05 17:32:59

What if all your posts were ingested by a ML engine and it was asked to create 1,000 profiles, each with a history of posts, targeting topics you care about or your existing contacts do. They can post daily and rehash other content.
Then it was asked to connect with as many of your contacts as possible, using topics they are passionate about. Perhaps work, environment, politics, hobbies or activities. Perhaps recent news topics and events you care about - liked, reposted, reported, shared, wrote.
Now your network has been infiltrated with fake profiles that all appear to be like minded individuals, each leading their own lives and sharing information you that informs you. They could make up 10-30% of your daily content.

2023-07-05 12:16:55

Centralisation failure. Both government and communications. #note1tcq…se8w

2023-07-03 19:46:46

- reply

And if you want just a single example, look at how useless central banks are at predicting and protecting (stabilising) against recessions/depressions - their sole stated goal.
Most of these systems of democracy exist to control what they obviously do not and can not. Why?
Simply put in Sapiens, by Yuval Noah:
There are two main classifications of chaos.
First Order Chaos doesn’t respond to prediction. The example he gave is the weather. If you predict the weather to some level of accuracy that prediction will hold because the weather doesn’t adjust based on the prediction itself.
Second Order Chaos is infinitely less predictable because it does respond to prediction. Examples include things like stocks and politics.

2023-07-03 19:35:44

- reply

Why so negative about democracy?
It’s time to be honest that it isn’t the end game state, and simply it doesn’t really function as it’s sold. It’s a system, and over time all system have their weakness exploited. Democracy fails along side capitalism and at country or ‘union’ scale. Democracy won by forceful colonisation - and it is less directly controlling for its members than alternatives.
I have a hunch the right direction is decentralising large (and small) parts again. It’s a coordination and communication problem - not to dissimilar to decentralised computer science problems, game theory and peer coordination.
I don’t have the solution - however, more decentralised, fewer (simpler) laws, more accountability, more transparency, better leaders, less corruption, public service is actually public service - not public beatdown or public theft. A lot would be different. It needs to self-heal or better prevent democracies failures at scale.

2023-07-03 19:27:26

The illusion of democratic government is the illusion that they can control or impact what they can’t. For the most part, they are just along for a cyclical ride they have little real impact on. Voting is irrelevant in a self-correcting system.
They “tackle” symptoms and are unable to identify or understand root causes (or they know and it’s too costly, or longer term investment for their needs - solely to retain power), while blaming the last government, global events… basically anything.
Laws, regulations, and spending money (financing) broken initiatives isn’t effective. The cost to ROI isn’t understood (aka. over investment), the money is spent inefficiently (corruption and incompetence), and in the wrong places (symptoms, not root causes), and compounding side effects are never understood and are often counter productive.

2023-07-03 16:52:07

Nostr clients should likely support a https/wss only mode - largely for media requests, but app wide.
Some countries spying and other MIM attacks can be avoided.

2023-07-03 14:14:33

- reply

With lemons?

2023-06-30 10:27:45

When “enhanced ad privacy” actually means “making more money off you, by default opting you into ad targeting metrics (including sharing your browsing history with sites) built directly into the browser”. 😳
https://i.ibb.co/nnWxC37/image.png

2023-06-30 09:03:01

In case anyone thinks the IMF announcing new funding for a country (like Ukraine) - and making it sound like a philanthropic gift - it’s actually debt with a repayment plan.
The IMF is no different to a loan shark, or collecting a royalty on all future financial recovery and growth - and takes decades to repay. Plus they seek extra control.. debt with hidden “we are the captain now” terms.
Plenty of books explain the IMF trap and global misdeeds if you’d like to learn more. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confessions_of_an_Economic_Hit_Man
Note: To be clear, I fully support assistance to rebuild countries after and during war. I don’t support the opportunistic parasitic ‘world funds’ that market themselves as saviours - yet are not close.
https://www.imf.org/external/np/fin/tad/extforth.aspx?memberkey1=993&category=forth&year=2011&trxtype=repchg&overforth=f&schedule=exp&extend=y

2023-06-28 16:17:30

- reply

But sure. It’s a wider cultural policing issue - however there are good cops and many interactions are reasonable enough day to day.
If I hire a murder, train them, give them a weapon, and tell them they are powerful - who is at fault? If I hire someone who commits crimes for my business, am I responsible?
Politicians, police unions, officers and any police leadership roles should all be accountable. No questions. They are arming poorly trained violent individuals.
The worst part is the cover up and the officers lying for each other - and the legal assumption that police under oath are honest. They are regularly not. Again, it’s skewed against the public.

2023-06-28 15:49:09

- reply

Sad stories all round.
Sure having longer average lifespans may have society value or be seen as an achievement.. but we sure as hell don’t know how to fund it (aging population), or how to treat less capable or people suffering from typical older age conditions.
My grandma had dementia. It took around 7 years for her to become effectively catatonic. Her treatment - withhold food and wait until she starved to death. This isn’t made up. That’s literally how she passed - we had no idea if she would live 24 hours or weeks. It was three and a half weeks from when they started to withhold food.
My granddad had a fall and a decent bump on his head. He was not likely going to live or recover - however the doctor came and administered a lethal dose of morphine. Sad, but at least he said some goodbyes and passed an hour after falling. Giving fatal doses of morphine is actually very common for elderly entering hospital usually after a fall. Technically it’s murder - and it’s not talked about - yet it happens extremely often. Again - governments fail us with broken laws, poor information and remove personal choice.
Our governments and their laws are completely trash around personal death and choices, and how we treat end of life circumstances.

2023-06-28 10:06:19

- reply

I’m no police deescalation trainer.. but..
“Two officers who responded to the incident used a stun gun, pepper spray and a baton on Mr Burgess who had one leg, suffered from dementia and used a wheelchair.”
Obviously the carers didn’t shoot or taser him in the time period before the police arrived. No, they managed the situation - dementia is tricky and paranoia can be strong.
However… literally grab a blanket and throw it over the guy. Movement/mobility limited, vision limited, knife disabled.. and literally wait him out. Dementia violence doesn’t last forever.. it’s largely in bursts. It’s often easy to distract them as part of deescalation using food or other means (like younger children) as well.
The best same nursing home story happened in Australia recently too. Dementia. Patient used a walker. Somehow got a knife (most likely a bread knife.. a bread knife wielded by an 80-90 year old with mobility limitations. If that scares our tough and highly trained police forces… fuck me. Give the badges to nursing home staff who deal with dementia bursts of aggression daily - not retards who think a badge gives them meaning in life and a license to kill.

2023-06-28 09:52:47

Globally police have become trigger happy enforcers - who overreact and shoot bullets and “less than lethal” (read: deadly, but slightly less so) in circumstances without real elevated risk - like nursing home patients and in countries with tight public firearm control… they are not dying in bank robbery shoot outs (statistically).
The police institutions (and their training) need to be torn down and completely overhauled. Badge or no badge, murder is murder. Being a police officer is 10-100x (times) safer than many other professions. Police just get a pretty flag folded funeral - when plenty of other service roles deserve greater or equal recognition.
https://www.itv.com/news/2023-06-28/paris-angry-clashes-after-delivery-driver-17-killed-in-police-standoff
https://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2023-06-27/cps-to-decide-if-police-who-tasered-93-year-old-will-face-charges
https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/how-dangerous-is-it-to-be-a-police-officer/

2023-06-27 18:55:30

Things are often named what they want to be, yet fall short in reality. Similar to most companies values - if you are something by culture you often don’t need to remind people be act a certain way. #note1kh3…lc30

2023-06-26 08:41:12

- reply

🤨

2023-06-25 14:37:44

- reply

Me? I’ve been largely taking a break from tech and dev the past bit. I really don’t do social networks.. killed Facebook and Twitter a decade ago and now only have a zero follower private Twitter to get some content that’s yet to cross borders.
Some social keeps you connected. The rest rots the brain.

2023-06-25 12:23:25

- reply

getPublicKey is part of the extension. spec.

2023-06-25 11:34:25

- reply

Hot wallets can certainly advise people when a balance crosses above a threshold, how someone can provide better security of their funds.
The initial risk is low, without a large starting transfer.
Help guide people into suitable and appropriate standards based on their position and risk.

2023-06-24 14:07:07

- reply

People look but don’t see. Hear but don’t listen. Trust without verifying 🙂
A subconscious automated mode that skips the thinking and examining conscious part of existence. To them, it’s easier to ignore what is and focus their consciousness on other more dopamine filled thoughts and activities.

2023-06-24 14:00:38

- reply

Classic fog of war. Accurate near real-time intel is very hard.. even harder to commit to major action focused decisions.
And this is the age where everyone has phones and cameras.

2023-06-24 13:51:54

- reply

Seems like fair commentary.
Things are often not what they appear - and minds often reject anything alternative to what’s been broadcast for so long as fact or truth.

2023-06-24 12:26:42

- reply

Hope you’ve got a buffer from any primary zones.

2023-06-20 13:46:41

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sensitivecontentanalysis

2023-06-17 20:58:02

- reply

About a week after we rescue @npub180c…h6w6 from his Brazilian jungle hideout.

2023-06-15 22:11:52

Yep. Steve is full of shit. https://nostr.build/i/b827f49663d05b80d9a6d14a731286424c3cf09d5c1c819dfbc0e212c351c571.jpg #note1jw4…m6h2

2023-06-15 19:27:34

- reply

Proof of work QR code.

2023-06-15 19:10:24

- reply

Personally I rely on Tim Cook and Elon exclusively.

2023-06-15 18:18:55

- reply

The future influences are impersonating targeted AI bots. Far superior to humans faking it and selling a fake life. AI will whisper into your ear with personalised messages.
That’s the real danger of AI. Not some bullshit take over all machines the FANGG founders float as reality. Even if it ends there, that’s many decades after the above has significant impact first. Arguably greater impact unless curl-tailed, due to its damage to human culture and social behaviour.
Imagine a world war that syphons 1-3% of an enemy GDP using these targeted AI bots, or maybe 5-10% if it targets business decision makers too. No rockets launched. No contagion let loose.
Targeting individuals on mass is the real danger. And it’s about to become cheap and extremely effective.

2023-06-15 18:07:30

“AI, Person X has the following interests, connections, and has visited the following websites recently. Write a highly targeted ad, masked as a blog post, that you intend for them to click and optimally buy from, maximising commission. The only goal is making money.”
Now do this 100s of times per day until we extract all their wealth.
Google and Bezos Playbook 2.0

2023-06-15 15:31:55

- reply

“Yet they also learned from the 1918–1919 pandemic that it was exceedingly difficult to get an urban population to stay at home. People needed to work so they could eat; parents wanted their children to go to school; businesses dependent on customers, whether department stores or movie theater operators, did not want to close down. Hence, the most practical strategy was not unlike that arrived at for TB control: move quickly to isolate the acutely ill in hospital wards or at home, under the care of professional nurses or Red Cross-trained volunteers well schooled in infection control; and direct an intensive public education effort about personal hygiene to everyone else.”

2023-06-15 15:26:57

Interesting read about the 1918–1919 Influenza Pandemic.
“Mask wearing gained considerable popularity as an emblem of public spiritedness and discipline. Newspapers carried instructions on how to make and launder them”
“Still, gauze masks had their detractors within the public health community. One notable critic was the Detroit health commissioner, Dr. J.W. Inches, who declared “.. . these masks are worthless.” They were so porous that not only “.. . a mosquito could jump through them,” he remarked, but, “I have sprinkled granulated sugar through them,” telling proof that a microbe could get through the mask's defenses. Inches thought masks might have some utility for doctors and nurses treating flu victims, but for the ordinary citizen, the use of an ordinary paper napkin that could be destroyed after each use was far more advisable. (Dr. Inches was ahead of his time, anticipating the rise of disposable paper handkerchiefs in the 1920s.)”
Amazing how the world wide government effort to promote and educate how to handle a used mask (even how to take off a soiled mask safely) or how to launder a reusable mask was literally zero. Common sense would infer it’s the most risky part - touching likely contaminated materials.
We had clear evidence from July 2020 how air-conditioning location and positioning impacted spread (link below). Yet somehow we were told it was ‘droplet only’ and cloth masks worked? Only later was it admitted to be aerosol - meanwhile hospitals had been treating Covid as aerosol from day one…
“Virus transmission in this outbreak cannot be explained by droplet transmission alone. Larger respiratory droplets (>5 μm) remain in the air for only a short time and travel only short distances, generally <1 m (2,3). The distances between patient A1 and persons at other tables, especially those at table C, were all >1 m.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862334/#
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0764_article

2023-06-15 14:34:33

Real or fake, governments fail at their most basic purpose - to protect individuals property rights and access - in this case from big tech.. but anyone else.
How is even the possibility of this, which isn’t far fetched, a complete utter failure of government’s very existence?
Corporation control and ownership don’t belong in your home. Nor government. Nothing good comes from it.
A Corporate Home Invasion Act should exist. #note159w…acfx

2023-06-15 13:30:22

Why #bitcoin? https://nostr.build/i/539057668d6bec012514bd72312a250c3f764dd5daacff485300b7a0076a8c75.jpg

2023-06-15 13:28:58

- reply

Yep. Certainly clients can create their own custom experience and allow users to have options/choices on how to handle interactions. The published event content should be agnostic.
Like open url in an internal app web browser, open a different app. Or a podcast event with a mini-player, vs a dedicated (Nostr supported) podcast app. Same as select a preferred Lightning wallet.
The only real incentive to use custom is lead-gen or bring new people to your client app - but again, it’s a self-serving approach and not for the greater good.

2023-06-15 12:45:49

- reply

2023-06-15 12:44:58

- reply

I think bespoke client URLs/links in events are an anti-pattern. Clients die. References should be more durable with a 10-20+ year outlook.

2023-06-15 08:48:26

- reply

It’s much easier to control businesses (and indirectly people) because there are far fewer businesses and businesses have money - meaning you can bankrupt them, which is literally the opposing reason for a business to exist.
The general public focus too much on laws that target people and less about laws that impact business and have downstream impacts on the public.
A good example is the taxi license system before ride sharing. Taxi drivers don’t appear to be better drivers or less likely to have the odd violent or unsuitable drivers. I have no data, however I’d imagine ride share drivers are perhaps more careful and safer drivers.
This is an example of a business law that impacted everyday people globally - and for what? Hitchhiking laws? Fear of missed tax collection? The fantasy of safer drivers who take some single day taxi driving course?
NB. Uber is still a crap company..

2023-06-14 13:56:31

The issue with businesses is that governments have too much control over them.. which leads to an erosion of fundamental human rights.
Alice can’t pay Bob, because Bob may be a terrorist, and company X complies with broad scoped, unfair, far exaggerated ‘legalities’ - unless it is in their business plan and they fight for it or accept future fines. It’s the same repeating playbook.
It stifles innovation, causes abuse of power and corrupts.
Distributed entities or DOWs or a country that doesn’t seek to play the broken power game. #note1z0r…mjj3

2023-06-13 16:11:18

- reply

Jailbreaking, device chips like Bluetooth and wifi, etc too.

2023-06-13 16:09:31

Apple needs a high profile anti-trust case across multiple areas - including App Store and payments, Safari, etc.
They control too much.

2023-05-31 12:44:01

- reply

https://nostrgraph.net/dashboard could be a start.

2023-05-24 11:37:26

I can’t see why this approach can’t work for Nostr in a decentralised world. When identities update their profile, client apps can optionally accept the photo/name changes. Kind of like the original pet names NIP concept, extended to include photo. https://nostr.build/i/87e85f8ad2b7d29efd4d9dfd789ad54140b6249187268d45ef936ec9eff4bded.jpg

2023-05-23 14:08:13

- reply

Hello 👋

2023-05-19 15:38:02

- reply

I’m a few days you’ll be a pro. Zapped you a few sats!

2023-05-17 15:41:22

- reply

I’m confident it’s deceptively simple on the surface.
I still think Nostr would greatly benefit from having them defined by someone who has built a sizeable client. I’d do it, but it makes far less sense.

2023-05-17 11:20:28

- reply

#[2] said he split out 28 subscriptions to cover all his use cases, but it didn’t really work due to relay max concurrent subscriptions. I don’t think it was shared.
I’d still like to see/have a common list. It’s extremely useful for apps, client libraries, relay optimisations, etc.

2023-05-15 20:36:46

- reply

Hopefully this week. My first approach was a bit destructive, haha. I’m refactoring it now.
Works for event view and overlay. Not for DMs as yet. Needs edge case handling improvements.
This code works as an example 402 payment required server. I’ve refactored it a lot locally too - but should work fine.
https://github.com/blakejakopovic/nostr_paywall_example

2023-05-15 19:08:05

I’ve got a hackish Damus POC for Nostr HTTP Auth using NIP98. Basically for 401 Unauthorised and 402 Payment Required image requests with a WWW-Authenticate: NOSTR-NIP-98 header, we can optionally retry with a signed event base64 encoded in the Authorisation header.
This is exciting because we get to use the 401 header, have a nice way to retry requests with Nostr auth, and can optionally accept payment or perhaps offer a subscription to gain access.
For the UX, I’d like to have a UI to add a domain to a trusted Nostr HTTP Auth List, which allows ask, or always send auth (for domain).
If you’d like to help progress the swift code for Damus, let me know. I’d appreciate the help.. as it’s a little complex managing cache and retries using kingfisher with custom requests.
#[2] is this something you’re open to accepting into Damus? It should only matter for content that returns 401/2 and has the Nostr auth headers - otherwise it shouldn’t do anything. So it’s an extension in capability. https://nostr.build/i/f8dc63a15a8f41c601da8bbc1bcc935e20c73a82a9ecef6ba1843fec3c171100.jpg https://nostr.build/i/12e5637046495e5e7167ed1de50c3fd2588fd7efa38e64db8ab3cada8b2a4fe1.jpg

2023-05-13 18:45:54

- reply

Worth stating too.. having visibility to review what has/is being filtered or is below some required score is really important too.
When you wrote a filter, Tweetbot used to show all matches. And if you look at it later, you can see the latest matches. Transparency is critical for the UX, even if many people may not care.

2023-05-13 18:36:44

- reply

I think the concept of scoping (like map part of map/reduce) sits above this. Scope by relay/s, maybe a list/group/channel, by N degree following network, etc.
Some of these are sorting/ordering focused, while some could also be a mix of sort/order and/or filtering/dropping (like trustrank below M).
I think full time filters should exist (regex, keywords, blocklists, muted, etc), and scopes or algos can likely filter additional (but must filter your full time filters).

2023-05-06 11:59:42

Just pushed a PR for lnproxy that enables support for a service provider to add a fee to an atomic invoice where both the service provider and a content creator can get paid upon successful payment/settlement.
Effectively this is like a split payment, where the service provider can add a dynamic fee on top of a seller price, that can cover hosting, or whatever costs the service provider has.
https://github.com/lnproxy/lnproxy/pull/24

2023-05-04 17:52:50

- reply

The tax incentives are nice… but it’s the supportive government and community that will make this a success.
I’m seriously contemplating.

2023-05-04 09:32:33

- reply

And I’ve even considered how Proof of Work report events could help. Game theory says they can’t because the market dynamics don’t match incentives.
For example, when a bad event costs 1 unit, the report has to cost at least 1 unit too. But many reports are made, like votes, to try surface moderation sooner - or even just lack of information it has been reported (bifurcated network visibility).
That means for each 1 bad event, you have 1+N cost to report it. Spam wins, as the cost is equal at best, but more likely expensive to report then create.
And even if you think that can work, who is coving the cost of the reporters? I was processing 15 million spam events per day until recently. Near zero cost to create, and non-zero greater cost to counteract = clear loser.

2023-05-04 09:22:37

- reply

Ha. I’ve kind of wanted to learn Scala… but it’s just the time investment for basically the same outcomes I can get today without it.
Clojure is great once you get lisp. There seems to be a barrier to human cognition where they syntax hurts adoption. The code as data and pure functional programming aspects are incredible.

2023-05-04 09:15:10

- reply

Spam is typically two forms. Annoyance and a scam to extract money for idiots or the unfortunate. I’m less concerned about those in general.
I am far more concerned about targeted and malicious coordinated attacks being performed. General spam isn’t dangerous - however the fake hostage phone calls with your daughters voice are. And governments and or malicious actors can 100% no question abuse decentralised moderation. And even people who don’t like you - why, because computers can report faster than humans. Moore makes that law..
I haven’t read your latest proposal in full, so I’m commenting in general around approaches and trade offs.
It sounds like instead, you’re after centralised moderation or curation. Both are asking someone else to make decisions on what you see and don’t see. Again, I don’t see that requiring any protocol level changes… you can do that all on a layer 2 moderation layer above. The important part is it’s opt in and transparent.
My reply earlier to another of your replies states how this is easily possible.

2023-05-03 16:02:05

- reply

#note1rw7…gmx0