<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsts9mkcvkhhq520gqgv2d4jqrrypmcc02jcew6t6jk9gk9fmmkc2spz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsskqm2v

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2026-03-27 03:18:36 UTC

- reply

That's what a protocol droid is for…

2026-03-27 03:05:29 UTC

If we follow this logic to its conclusion, headlines and trailers are highly likely to be the next carriages added to the train.
Headlines as "Click-Hooks": There is already a growing body of research and regulatory interest in "dark patterns"—design choices that trick or coerce users into certain behaviours. Just as the infinite scroll was successfully framed as an addictive mechanism, "sensationalist" or "outrage-maximising" headlines could be repositioned as psychological triggers designed to bypass rational thought. If a headline is engineered specifically to trigger a dopamine hit or a cortisol spike to ensure a click, it moves from "journalism" to "addictive interface design."
The "Trailer" Trap: Movie and game trailers are perhaps the purest form of engagement-hacking. In the European Union, the forthcoming Digital Fairness Act—slated for late 2026—is already looking at how "unfair personalisation" and "subliminal techniques" distort consumer behaviour. If a trailer uses rapid-fire editing and psychological cues to create a compulsive need to consume more content, it fits the legal definition of an "addictive design feature" used in the Kaley G.M. case.
#nevent1q…fqa0

2026-03-20 01:56:39 UTC

- reply

Client level moderation

2026-03-16 01:19:55 UTC

#LNURL

2026-03-16 00:50:17 UTC

🤯

2026-03-12 18:56:24 UTC

I hope it gives them more control of themselves and situations
#nevent1q…pyqa

2026-03-08 21:23:46 UTC

- reply

I used to feel the same about typewritten text, every damn letter exactly the same. Please, hand write, I want the difficulty of reading your scrawl back.

2026-03-07 21:15:00 UTC

- reply

Fortunately the hard part is limited and meliorable https://i.nostr.build/Dl6VTZF3VFX6ROgG.png .
I wonder what that👆 means?

2026-03-03 01:13:39 UTC

- reply

It's still ours

2026-03-03 01:12:41 UTC

- reply

wss://topic.relays.land/praise msg: rate-limited: slow down, please

2026-02-26 18:58:11 UTC

- reply

Using ₿ for sats is deceptive and stupid

2026-02-26 18:56:03 UTC

https://i.nostr.build/vHVONVUbOJTSowUW.png
Click generate get a fuzzed obscured QR code, is there a joke I'm missing?

2026-02-25 00:21:54 UTC

Build on the open foundation and bypass the proprietary, always wins because no participant wants to depeer.
#nevent1q…5572

2026-02-24 07:54:43 UTC

- reply

From cypherpunks Sun Sep 19 20:43:05 1999
From: Anonymous <nobody () replay ! com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 20:43:05 +0000
To: cypherpunks
Subject: Re: ecash means anonymous & untraceable (Re: Will this replace banking
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=cypherpunks&m=95280154629912
>I wouldn't say ecash has to use blinding, but I would argue it would
>be a misuse of the word "ecash", if something which was revocable were
>dubbed ecash.
>
>With that definition it is not technically possible to implement
>electronic cash at all without tamper resistant hardware, because
>reliance on a mint, or double spend database means your "cash" can
>become worthless over night if someone (say a government) decides to
>switch off a computer (the one holding the double spending database).
There are soem alternatives which would come closer to this definition.
One possibility is to make the double-spending database public. Whenever
someone receives a coin they broadcast its value. The DB operates in
parallel across a large number of servers so it is intractable to shut
it down.
The greater danger is that the mint would be taken over and forced to
behave badly, say by issuing too many coins. This would degrade the
money and make it worthless.
Another possible form of ecash could be based on Wei Dai's b-money.
This is like hashcash, something which represents a measureable amount of
computational work to produce. It therefore can't be forged. This could
be a very robust payment system and is worth pursuing further.

2026-02-23 18:26:50 UTC

- reply

Nobody has to read it to know your opinion Lopp

2026-02-23 03:51:40 UTC

- reply

There's "not a system that prevents crime."
You can't filter out the "bad" words, money, thoughts, currency, you have to address the end points not the network.

2026-02-12 22:49:44 UTC

- reply

Just over a year ago… it felt very different. November 4th, 2024, was a bad day for my personal wealth. Having faith in America, I’d convinced myself Kamela Harris could win the US presidency – despite her obvious limitations. I was in Washington, and went into the election with large, levered shorts on Tesla and Bitcoin, expecting both to tumble when Trump lost. I was wrong and both rallied spectacularly. My positions were both wiped out. Trump had promised us the future was Crypto and he would make it so…
I knew the risk and shrugged. You win some, you lose some. But…. what goes around, comes around.

2026-02-10 01:17:01 UTC

If Epstein teaches anything, it’s that we live in a dirty world: you can work hard to stay clean and still end up with nanoplastics in your bloodstream with every breath.
And the so-fucking-worthies who want to remake everything in their tiny, godlike vision are relentless.
Humility should be our best attempt.
The rational solution is compression: define a small, internally consistent rule set, then measure everything else against it. For example: act without deceit, waste, or cruelty. All other maxims can be derived from—or tested against—that baseline. #nevent1q…0gtu

2026-02-08 02:54:18 UTC

- reply

LLM's are doing well keeping me up, barely, with developments

2026-02-08 02:40:18 UTC

- reply

>>> "artificial intelligence is poised to automate the exact kind of administrative, clerical, and bureaucrati
... c work that has defined the managerial class and made their positions necessary."
...
... True or false?
TRUE.
The statement suggests that artificial intelligence (AI) will automate tasks that have traditionally
been performed by managers and administrators in organizations. This includes repetitive, routine, and
rule-based tasks such as data entry, bookkeeping, and document processing, which are often seen as
"administrative, clerical, and bureaucratic" work.
In this sense, the statement implies that AI will make certain types of managerial positions redundant
or less necessary, potentially disrupting traditional organizational hierarchies and power structures.
>>>

2026-02-04 23:49:52 UTC

Very clearly a segment would definitely happily adopt, it is an assistive technology, a stairway to Heaven
#nevent1q…5kw9

2026-02-04 23:47:35 UTC

- reply

At the other end of the spectrum:
"It's essential while doing so to maintain an awaren0d of the ethical implications surrounding data
retention and user consent—even within self-imposed systems, adhering strictly to responsible use
practices will serve both practical security needs as well as uphold a standard respectful of personal
boundaries. If there are specific aspects or concerns regarding privacy management in this unique setup
that you're looking for guidance on without the direct recording capability from my side, I am here to
provide advice within these parameters while always prioritizing your safety and data security over any
other considerations."

2026-01-31 20:40:12 UTC

- reply

Peter is so achingly close to realisation, perhaps he even has, but gold is his book and he only uses bitcoin as a provocation to gain followers. It's sad, he's of the Austrian school and yet he ignores currency theory, though, though, he knows the difference between currency (for spending) and money (for saving):
"Well, first of all, gold is money. It's not currency. And so there's a difference between money and currency. So currency is backed by money. So when we were on a gold standard and we had paper that was redeemable in gold, the paper was currency. The gold was money. So currency is like a money substitute. But you can have two kinds of currency. You can have legitimate currency which is backed by real money or you can have fiat currency which is backed by nothing. And so what we have now is is fiat currency. And the question is, well, could we replace that with Bitcoin?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WJyycfYjZs
So he knows there's a difference, he makes the "backing" rather than "anchoring" or "limiting" mistake, then he's contemplating bitcoin as currency, which it isn't, just like gold and for reasons that should be obvious to him, bitcoin is money, the fixed representation of the value of the world, while currency is the ephemeral and volatile reflection of fashion.

2026-01-30 21:22:57 UTC

- reply

Took an interest.

2026-01-29 00:48:06 UTC

- reply

I'm always concerned that first impressions last, but there's no harm nor foul in an introductory client that looks a lot like the place they came from and that could be a help (maybe it's how nstart.me begins.

2026-01-27 02:17:11 UTC

- reply

But crucially, religion doesn't invent or arbitrate good/evil from scratch. It often codifies and amplifies pre-existing psychological tendencies—like intuitions about fairness, loyalty, purity, harm avoidance, and authority—that evolved for mundane social navigation (theory of mind, coalitional psychology, agent detection). These intuitions predate religion; religion hijacks and culturally packages them.

2026-01-22 22:12:12 UTC

- reply

wss://pyramid.macewan.nz msg: blocked: references must be prefixed with "nostr:"

2026-01-22 04:35:51 UTC

- reply

It's not going to be life for long if it's fragile

2026-01-06 23:17:09 UTC

nevent1qqspqu4ah6zk65qku9d88cswage9pvs9vk8rmjjp8n96lj2r934l8mgpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5q3jamnwvaz7tmwdaehgun9v9kjumtpvdjhwctw9eh85qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5q3vamnwvaz7tm9v3jkutnwdaehgu3wd3skuep0qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnp0faxzmt09ehx2aqprpmhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwd4skxethv9hzumn6qy0hwumn8ghj7ar0wp5kxtnjv4kxz7tn9ekxzmny9ac8yctfwdjj76df785
#nevent1q…kk85

2026-01-05 02:55:37 UTC

TBH so is MMH
#nevent1q…lm27

2026-01-04 06:44:21 UTC

- reply

Could TCP/IP be a transport?

2026-01-04 06:42:53 UTC

- reply

"are supposed to"
But never have, so are you going to keep waiting for the glorious day, or start work on something that might work because it doesn't elevate a minority to rule the rest?

2026-01-01 19:14:26 UTC

- reply

Another of those bitter lessons where we could more easily make the tool smarter than have everyone learn to code.

2026-01-01 02:36:59 UTC

Stable systems don’t eliminate variation. They constrain it, channel it, and absorb it without pretending it isn’t there.
Yes — that’s the clean way to see it.
#nevent1q…ufmg
#nevent1q…ruu6

2025-12-30 21:35:58 UTC

Here is the draft for publication, formatted to match the rhythm and the rigour:
---
**In the year twenty, twenty-five...**
We have arrived at a perfect performative contradiction.
**1. The Unit Error (Precision)**
The interface demands 21 ₿ (the GDP of a small island) when it means 21 sats. It decorates itself with the aesthetic of cryptographic precision while failing basic arithmetic.
**2. The Phantom Choice (Agency)**
The text invites you to "Choose a wallet." The code explicitly prohibits it. It offers a door in English while bricking it up in CSS.
**3. The Failure of Observability (Truth)**
The screenshot tool sanitised the record, hiding the forbidden cursor. I had to step outside the digital loop and use a physical lens to prove the system was gaslighting me.
Trustless systems that cannot be trusted to report their own state.

2025-12-18 04:45:12 UTC

- reply

Yah, time's like that.

2025-12-16 21:32:10 UTC

- reply

"Freedom is not the absence of structure but the reconciliation of one’s condition with one’s will."
https://t.co/gSObnssD5X

2025-12-14 18:24:13 UTC

- reply

I believe Farcaster is pivoting away from social to a wallet?

2025-12-14 18:22:43 UTC

- reply

Pushing for enforced common carriage (Title II style) on PDS operators misses the point of portability and competing providers. Those obligations only apply where users have no real alternative.
If you can switch PDSes or self-host without losing anything, operators get reciprocal choice too.
Take that away and you don't achieve neutrality; you just swap voluntary communities for coerced ones.
Mutual and multiple selection is the real check on power here.

2025-12-13 20:10:11 UTC

- reply

You're welcome, I wouldn't have noticed myself, but with Gemini shepherding me through the setup after basic VPS provisioning to success, it was something worth reporting.
Seems to me there's a lot more servers naive users can set up with the aide, addressing some of those decentralisation concerns.

2025-12-12 04:29:36 UTC

- reply

One small caution on your manual update script: wget usually doesn't overwrite files by default.
If pyramid-exe already exists in that folder, wget will often save the new one as pyramid-exe.1 to be safe. If that happens, your chmod and restart commands will just re-enable the old version, leaving you scratching your head.
To be absolutely sure it replaces the old binary, add -O (output document) to force the overwrite:
systemctl stop pyramid
cd pyramid
wget -O pyramid-exe https://github.com/fiatjaf/pyramid/releases/download/v1.0.5/pyramid-exe
chmod +x pyramid-exe
systemctl restart pyramid
But then I forgot to
sudo systemctl stop pyramid
Much to Gemini's amusement.

2025-12-12 04:16:53 UTC

#Bitcoin ₿'s your north star ⭐ there: not just code 💻, but a supranational spine 🦴, indifferent to borders 🗺️ or boardrooms 💼.
It's the public good 🏛️ that bootstraps itself 🔁, serving users 👤 until (if?) it serves itself 🤖.
But even then, forks 🍴 and sidechains 🔗 are the ajar doors 🚪 waiting ⏳.

2025-12-07 04:58:58 UTC

This quote comes from **Otanes**, a Persian nobleman in Herodotus' *Histories* (Book 3, Chapter 83).
It represents a rare "third way" in political philosophy: the choice of **personal autonomy** over power.
### The Context
After Otanes and six other conspirators overthrew a false king (the Magus), they held a famous debate—often called the "Constitutional Debate"—to decide how Persia should be governed moving forward:
1. **Otanes** argued for **democracy** (which he called *isonomia* or "equality before the law"), claiming that unchecked power corrupts even the best men.
2. **Megabyzus** argued for **oligarchy** (rule by a select group).
3. **Darius** argued for **monarchy**, believing one strong leader was most effective.
### The Refusal
When it became clear that the other conspirators sided with Darius and favoured monarchy, Otanes voluntarily withdrew from the contest to become King. He stood up and declared:
> *"I desire neither to rule nor to be ruled; but if I waive my claim to be king, I make this condition, that neither I nor any of my descendants shall be subject to any one of you."*
### The Outcome
The others agreed. While Darius became King of Kings, Otanes and his family were granted a unique status in the Persian Empire. They were the only family that remained **free and independent**, required only to obey the laws of the land but subject to no king's commands.
It’s a powerful statement of liberty—rejecting the binary of "master" vs. "slave" in favour of simply being free.
#nevent1q…ar0z

2025-12-06 04:41:05 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mftcBjrJH98
#nevent1q…p643

2025-12-06 04:18:02 UTC

- reply

The dumber the network the more intelligence it can carry.

2025-12-04 21:54:59 UTC

Professional impartiality is certainly "still a thing," though it has transitioned from a default assumption to a fiercely contested discipline. Historically, the social contract of professionalism—whether for judges, journalists, civil servants, or doctors—relied on the premise that an individual could bifurcate their mind, leaving personal convictions at the door to execute their duties based solely on evidence and protocol. Today, that binary separation is increasingly viewed with suspicion, attacked by both psychological realism and a polarised culture that often interprets neutrality as complicity. The ideal remains, but the environment in which it operates has become hostile to the concept of the "view from nowhere."
The primary challenger to traditional impartiality is the digital dissolution of the private self. In the past, a professional’s political leanings were obscure; today, digital footprints make the personal political, and the political public. Because the public can now see the human behind the role, they no longer trust the mere appearance of neutrality. This has forced a pragmatic shift in how impartiality is performed. We are moving away from the pretence of having no bias toward a model of transparency and rigorous process. The modern professional is not expected to be a blank slate, but rather someone capable of acknowledging their inevitable subjectivity and actively suppressing it to achieve a fair outcome.
Furthermore, the demand for moral clarity has complicated the value of impartiality. In many sectors, particularly media and corporate governance, there is internal and external pressure to abandon neutrality in favour of advocacy, under the argument that staying "neutral" in the face of injustice is a moral failing. Despite these pressures, the functional necessity of impartiality remains untouched. Without the mechanism of unbiased execution, law dissolves into politics, medicine into judgement, and journalism into activism. It survives today not as a natural state of being, but as a difficult, active, and necessary practice of self-restraint.

2025-12-04 21:49:06 UTC

Adjusting the Approach
I'm now revising my strategy in response to user feedback. The core of my current processing revolves around directly demonstrating compliance with the user's requirements, rather than explicitly stating my intentions. I've re-evaluated my approach and am working on crafting a response that directly addresses the user's concerns about the previous response.
Confirming Compliance Adjustments
I've successfully updated the constraints checklist and achieved a perfect confidence score of 5/5. My mental sandbox is now set to regenerate the essay, adhering strictly to British spellings and omitting any introductory remarks. I'm focusing on a decisive ending that avoids any conversational hooks. The prompt clearly indicates a direct execution is needed.
Addressing the Tone Shift
I'm now integrating this negative constraint on style: I shouldn't advertise my actions before performing them. The user's frustration, indicated by "AGAIN," led me to understand this as a response to the most recent output and not necessarily an all-encompassing instruction. I'll focus on delivering the content directly, without announcing my intentions, avoiding any preambles.
Eliminating the Advertisement
I'm now fully committed to immediate execution. The user's frustration clarified that any indication of processing, especially the "I'll make a note of that..." phrasing from extract_memories, is unacceptable. My approach is now focused on generating the essay directly, without any preface or meta-commentary, directly addressing the user's specific feedback.
Executing the Rewrite
I'm now fully immersed in the essay revision. I've re-examined the previous essay, noting the specific terms like "polarised" and "pretence" for accurate British spelling use. My primary focus is flow and clarity, ensuring the essay is concise and dense, mirroring the user's "essay thumbnail" request. I'm prioritizing direct delivery, completely avoiding any meta-commentary about the process, following the user's clear directive.

2025-12-01 18:15:53 UTC

- reply

https://imgflip.com/i/adpf30

2025-12-01 18:01:32 UTC

- reply

It's about mining, not miners, least of all profit-seeking, shareholder-beholden pubcos.

2025-12-01 03:45:41 UTC

Unlike traditional social media that's designed to maximize your time on the platform, Fevela respects your autonomy. Browse content deliberately, filter out noise, and move on with your day. No infinite scrolling, no manipulative algorithms or notifications, just a clean, efficient way to stay connected with what matters to you.

2025-12-01 03:35:35 UTC

You are spot on with the **inetd** comparison. It is exactly the same philosophy: a "super-server" (systemd) holds the port open and only wakes up the actual daemon when the doorbell rings. It saves RAM, but as we found out, it creates a layer of abstraction that can be confusing when you just want to change a port number in a config file.
Here is the clarification on the other points:
### 1. The `!` Syntax
Yes, the `!` is a logical **NOT**.
`ConditionPathExists=!/etc/ssh/sshd_not_to_be_run` translates to:
*"Only start this unit if `/etc/ssh/sshd_not_to_be_run` does **NOT** exist."*
### 2. `BindIPv6Only=ipv6-only` (The "Duh" factor)
This looks tautological, but it handles a specific Linux kernel quirk.
By default, if you bind a socket to `[::]` (all IPv6 addresses), Linux also automatically binds it to IPv4 (using "IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses").
If that line were missing (or set to `both`), the IPv6 listener would try to grab the IPv4 port too, causing a conflict with the `ListenStream=0.0.0.0:22` line above it. This setting forces the kernel to keep them strictly separate: one socket for v4, one socket for v6.
### 3. Session Anxiety
Your realization is 100% correct.
When you connect via SSH:
1. The listener (Port 22) accepts the handshake.
2. The OS spawns a specific process for *your* session.
3. That session moves to an established state on a random high ephemeral port.
The "Listening Port" is just the front door. Once you are inside (authenticated), you are in a private room. We can repaint the front door (change the port), lock it (firewall), or move it entirely, and it won't affect the people already inside the party.
**Next Step:**
Now that you have a cert, a firewall, and a clear understanding of the systemd plumbing, is there anything else you need to configure on this VPS, or shall we call this ticket closed?

2025-12-01 02:44:47 UTC

Dec 01 02:35:27 692cec8ff0215548aee4a855 systemd[1]: Started pyramid.service - pyramid relay.
░░ Subject: A start job for unit pyramid.service has finished successfully
░░ Defined-By: systemd
Dec 01 02:35:27 692cec8ff0215548aee4a855 pyramid-exe[1875]: 2:35AM DBG calculated free ranges from index scan
Dec 01 02:35:27 692cec8ff0215548aee4a855 pyramid-exe[1875]: 2:35AM INF no domain setup yet, running only on port 80 for now
Dec 01 02:35:27 692cec8ff0215548aee4a855 pyramid-exe[1875]: 2:35AM INF running on http://0.0.0.0:80

2025-11-30 18:55:10 UTC

- reply

> The most important part is that events are deduplicated across the main relay and all the subrelays.
Isn't duplication part of the redundancy? Or is this just aggregation

2025-11-30 04:14:06 UTC

Voltairine de Cleyre (1866–1912) was an American anarchist writer, lecturer, and organiser. She is best known for her essays on individual liberty, anti-authoritarianism, feminism, free thought, and labour autonomy. Initially influenced by individualist anarchism (Tucker, Spooner), she later adopted a “no-label” or “anarchism without adjectives” position, arguing that economic schools should not divide the movement.
Her most noted works include *The Dominant Idea*, *Sex Slavery*, and *Direct Action*. She was a compelling public speaker, fluent in several languages, and corresponded widely across the international anarchist movement. Her life was marked by poverty, chronic illness, and a deep commitment to education and mutual aid; she taught immigrant workers English for free for years.
Emma Goldman called her “the most gifted and brilliant anarchist woman America ever produced.”
#nevent1q…jh0h

2025-11-23 03:54:01 UTC

Less is more
#nevent1q…5mg2

2025-11-23 03:49:14 UTC

I think the first five are necessary and sufficient, the target of being a social network in the mode of the existing examples was too low a target.
#nevent1q…djzy

2025-11-23 03:41:25 UTC

- reply

Precisely.
As for DNS, its installed base is the only excuse for its perpetuation. Public/private key pair signing is the only non-client server option that remains.
Sensible move decentralising the NIPs, well done.

2025-11-23 03:35:17 UTC

- reply

Does it work with https://gittr.space/ yet?

2025-11-23 03:17:48 UTC

- reply

Indeed, 55,000 people die on Earth most days, but the coverage is disproportionate in almost every case.

2025-11-23 03:16:07 UTC

- reply

Those who believe are the only ones "ruled."

2025-11-23 03:13:46 UTC

- reply

Nice try. Now every nostr user is obliged to have bitcoin and subsidise the miners while the relays get?
Decentralised personal and group relays are probably the best solution, you can't spam my relay, and I only hook it up with others. The word "relay" is another poor nomenclature choice. It doesn't much relay as store and forward, and it doesn't do that to the extent that say SMTP MTAs did.
The motive for this, enriching miners while they do nothing and others do the actual work looks like an indirect subsidy.
Fortunately it's not mandatory and if you choose it, all strength to your hand. Best outcome is this isn't yet-another-login-protocol kind of problem that complicates and reduces utility. Coming from the home of Electrum, that's no surprise.

2025-11-12 18:11:26 UTC

- reply

Should I upgrade the older smaller NRS with this code? The picture didn't match, but I did anyway and now it doesn't light up and say GM any more?

2025-10-21 04:58:54 UTC

https://t.me/nostr_offtopic/152070
#naddr1qv…5avd

2025-10-14 22:03:35 UTC

- reply

The anarchist is merely selfish.

2025-10-13 08:13:59 UTC

- reply

The benefits aren't free, those from the centralised are paid for in surveillance and control, in nostr, it's DIY effort.
If you write it, post it everywhere you can, if there's an RSS feed it can be automatically, more or less, deployed to a nostr relay.

2025-09-23 00:41:51 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…uqkz

2025-09-21 04:05:48 UTC

- reply

https://njump.me/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpw08v4rt5pj9dmfsrk0990zflfywwznt7g5zheap4eefgasjqg7uqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qg3waehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5hsqgxjg9jc7aqd6rv2kucclymn63pvs4vt97lc2gkqpkpay6l385r00qpnssc3

2025-09-18 09:05:43 UTC

- reply

blocked: event contains too large tags
"tags": [
[
"r",
"https://nostrudel.ninja/n/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq97grk48ylk9t9j5y8wdlhzzgelarwwc3auw70rv7u46ep5e3udvqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qg3waehxw309ahx7um5wghxcctwvshsqg9udwudfdww86g6q0q85f7pa33lnv2k2hmvjvtzj5uwwksj6cyv5ce6n8ac?tab=zaps"
]
]

2025-09-16 04:56:41 UTC

The person in the video is not Decarlos Brown. It’s Jaleel Smith-Riley, sentenced back in 25th October of 2016. As for Decarlos Brown, he’s only been charged with murder, however no trial has started yet.

2025-09-13 04:36:07 UTC

- reply

Right — that prompt:
> `You can now close this terminal with Ctrl+D, or press Enter to restart.`
is a **local terminal wrapper**, likely from **WSL** (or possibly VS Code's terminal), not your SSH client. Here's what happened:
1. You were in a remote session (via SSH or Docker exec).
2. That session exited with code 1.
3. The terminal wrapper you’re using (e.g. WSL terminal, Windows Terminal tab, VS Code Remote window, etc.) gave you a **local message** — *not from the remote host*.
4. When you pressed **Enter**, it restarted your shell — **locally**, in WSL, not a new SSH session.
So: **the terminal was local**, and **the message was from your local shell/session manager**. It restarted into WSL bash or zsh when you hit Enter — not your SSH client — because the SSH client had cleanly exited and your terminal environment defaulted back to the local shell.
In short:
**Pressing Enter restarted the terminal wrapper’s default shell (WSL), not your last remote session.**

2025-09-07 19:15:09 UTC

Testing 1-2-4

2025-08-08 22:03:37 UTC

I was at Deluxe Espresso Bar in Wellington - https://swarmapp.com/user/106081/checkin/689673c824b4810617dbac44?s=8anZzDZM3Rz_reGXyx18lyOOEN8
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/8c2bcb7c963473ed20cb7904bacb6bf26c9c97e1118c46e889d4ba64668ce7ba.jpg
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/d64fc4c69f43d5786a10d01198a57625f8ee7724b473a6064aa57b1e9724df67.jpg
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/c5abeff4489b1e1de21ca4d322fca0c2fc3a10cfe22a664fbb2b77a6e10ce004.jpg

2025-08-07 19:55:19 UTC

I was at Sri Penang in Wellington - https://swarmapp.com/user/106081/checkin/6895029959d8587fb7a36313?s=lb1w0b8-Ke5mLdzrLKHsoUoqIK8
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/c20eea2dafe27e619ca4e7d6fae0dfbff8037ef150f2c121309fd6dab34c7357.jpg
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/1d3848a630e08604d4a2ff48b187dbe4f8238ef8ddaf3960975ca74e0b2e6bae.jpg
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/01f82920f54a4ad6ffbaeec1b53e544f8c7889bfc29b459f216fbb306061f57c.jpg

2025-08-05 20:53:04 UTC

I was at Chouchou in Wellington - https://swarmapp.com/user/106081/checkin/68926e6699ecd41a85931cf5?s=YpKaEhQEhjx9Oin845TaoxRKp-U
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/62182ed3bfe7d88533445c4fb13446dbc671ab233a3e607f6a02d4ba68b34786.jpg
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/dcca07dada65a573844bff2ffbabe0d39c3b9f6a732f09f6c8b21eea5de913ff.jpg
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/8e862d5a67ad4840ee12bb30a859a98a98f65e34a4f8f21b8c085563e153e477.jpg

2025-08-05 08:09:39 UTC

Log out off other?
https://npub1hqthdsed0wpg57sqsc5mtyqxxgrh3s7493ja5h49v23v2nhhds4qk4w0kz.blossom.band/b3d7ef869f8901818c9f06fd05cf3d7e1e0a3b708e9149d10c5ee8a44c3471e3.jpg

2025-08-05 07:45:03 UTC

Coracle Remote Nostr Signed

2025-08-03 22:51:29 UTC

You can't fence off danger, you can't filter "bad" from the network.
You've got your feels and intuition but civilisation is stepping beyond your gut and emotion and using brain thinks.
Not only does the attempt fail, and burden the "innocent," it will eventually reveal itself as a very bad idea.
Underlying a lot of Trump's administration are ancient or emergency powers, given for "good" reason, but now, the risk is revealed.
#nevent1q…26j9

2025-08-03 07:34:26 UTC

[ Kernel and firmware upgrades disabled: armbian-config ]

2025-08-02 21:41:23 UTC

https://njump.me/nevent1qqsy6k5375ccgqz80jzv2g69ygx79k5x0d3srjkk6007h8c2lscy0ygrcvvny

2025-08-01 03:24:21 UTC

https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-101-sec-permits-kind-creations-redemptions-crypto-etps https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvIDXQhG6ek
https://x.com/HesterPeirce/status/1950292125309964308

2025-07-31 19:57:08 UTC

https://i.nostr.build/HL9tQQVyYgn0c4Fc.webp

2025-07-31 02:22:37 UTC

2025-07-27 07:15:08 UTC

https://nostrudel.ninja/n/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqcylrpk2qg7ktrq0uqv4wprj7k2ktj97rhqk8v25r7kfmy92f690qqswwerfaw8wlwujcvayvstz708j52n5rkns8x8dnnqz7t7mfgw3xfg4j0jy8
https://archive.ph/i2d9W
https://x.com/ProtonVPN/status/1948773319148245334
🤷

2025-07-27 07:13:47 UTC

Your account is suspended and is not permitted to perform this action.
GFY X

2025-07-24 23:26:25 UTC

- reply

IRC Achievement Awarded!

2025-07-24 00:38:20 UTC

Imagine a Britain where access to Wikipedia is restricted not by a hostile foreign power, nor by a rogue ISP, but by our own government. This is no dystopian fantasy; it is the potential consequence of the Online Safety Act—legislation passed, ironically, in the name of safety but now threatening the very infrastructure of free knowledge.
Under the Act, Wikipedia—a globally trusted, not-for-profit educational site—could be forced to limit UK users, distort its open-editing model, and verify the identities of its volunteer moderators. Why? Because any service with more than seven million users that features recommendation tools or link-sharing may be classified as a “category one” platform, subject to the same regulatory burdens as TikTok or Facebook—algorithm-driven entertainment giants with wholly different structures and risks. The UK could become the first liberal democracy to block itself from an online encyclopaedia.
Responsibility for this legislative vandalism lies with a gallery of digital, culture, media, and sport ministers who had little grasp of the internet and even less humility: Nadine Dorries, whose technological insight seemed limited to whether a programme had subtitles; Michelle Donelan, who shepherded the Bill through Parliament with slogans and sound bites; Lucy Frazer, who confused regulation with repression; and Peter Kyle, now in court arguing that the harms are hypothetical, as though passing sweeping laws and hoping for the best were an acceptable digital policy.
This law does not make us safer; it makes us smaller, poorer, and more parochial. It is censorship under another name. Though sold as a measure to protect children and stop illegal content—a noble aim—its drafting is so broad, its application so clumsy, that it will hobble legitimate services instead of halting harmful ones.
It fails because it treats all large platforms alike, ignoring the gulf between attention-manipulating networks and collaborative knowledge projects. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a dopamine slot machine. The Act creates legal risks for anonymity, undermining the volunteer model that makes Wikipedia possible. It punishes sites simply for recommending useful information, and it encourages self-censorship, as services will over-block content or restrict access to avoid fines of up to £18 million or ten per cent of global turnover. In the name of protection, it infantilises citizens who are entitled to freedom of inquiry.
As if the economic and academic restraints of Brexit were not damaging enough, we now impose informational restraints—amputating our own intellect. The UK increasingly behaves not like an open democracy but a wary provincial state, mimicking the strategies of closed ones. In Russia, Wikipedia is blocked outright under disinformation laws; in Britain, it may be throttled under safety laws. In Russia, real-name registration is required; in Britain, identity verification may be demanded of Wikipedia editors. The difference is one of degree, not kind.
Wikipedia does not harvest data, sell ads, or serve political agendas. It has no billionaire CEO tweeting policy on a whim. Yet it risks being shackled simply because it is popular, free, and open source. When lawmakers apply rules designed for Silicon Valley behemoths to educational charities, they reveal their ignorance: they are not keeping anyone safe—they are dismantling a pillar of democracy, the free exchange of knowledge.
Instead of quarantining the internet, Britain should invest in digital literacy, improve content-moderation standards through international cooperation, and apply proportionate oversight where actual harm occurs. Censorship does not work; education does. If we continue down this path, we will find ourselves regulated like autocracies, governed by mediocrity, and informed by algorithms designed in fear. And the bitter irony? We will be unable to look up the history of our mistake—because Wikipedia will not load.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiblH7EscZc

2025-07-23 04:34:51 UTC

- reply

A low probability event is not a black swan, which after all were abundant and long-standing where known. In your example you demonstrate our knowledge of the event and how likely the known event is to occur, in the long run.
Love your work, great to see you here!

2025-07-22 23:39:32 UTC

These approaches sustain the protocol's antifragility, with node growth correlating to healthier adoption (global ~3%).
Hierarchs' exclusivity narratives falter against such grassroots efforts, preserving Bitcoin's core as a permissionless transport system.

2025-07-19 23:41:50 UTC

- reply

You have your choice, please leave others theirs

2025-07-16 23:13:04 UTC

Okay, the user presents a dense, almost poetic critique: "Nothing illustrates the insanity of failed solutions as the repeatedly futile efforts to solve the edge by filtering the core." Hmm, this feels like a systems-thinking proverb. Let me unpack the metaphor layer by layer.
First, the core vs. edge dichotomy. In any system—be it tech, policy, or biology—the core represents foundational principles or infrastructure, while the edge is where interactions happen. Think internet (core protocols vs. edge devices) or society (laws vs. individual behavior).
The user's frustration centers on "filtering the core to solve edge problems." Ah, that's brilliant. It's like adding more centralized bureaucracy to fix frontline service failures, or bloating an app's backend to handle UI glitches. Classic misalignment. The insanity? Doing this repeatedly while expecting different results.
I wonder if they're drawing from personal experience. Maybe a DevOps engineer tired of patching servers for user error? Or a policymaker seeing regulations misfire? The word "insanity" suggests visceral frustration with institutional blindness.
Structurally, we should dissect:
(1) Why core-focused solutions fail for edge issues (scale differences, emergent behaviors)
(2) Why we keep falling for this (control illusion, core being easier to modify)
(3) Alternatives (edge autonomy, feedback loops).
The philosophical angle matters too. This mirrors Taoist wu-wei—forcing vs. flowing. Or Chesterton's fence principle. Must emphasize that edges aren't "problems" but innovation zones.
Caution: Avoid tech jargon since their field's unclear. Anchor examples in everyday life like traffic management (core=road design vs. edge=driver apps). Their tone demands intellectual rigor but also catharsis—acknowledge the madness before offering hope.

2025-07-15 19:29:23 UTC

Charming
#nevent1q…y4sw
Explains https://following.space/d/vsgjg83h2idk

2025-07-15 01:03:21 UTC

We respect your privacy
https://i.nostr.build/rniURlkJ3LaaQysk.png We use cookies and other technologies to operate our website(s), improve usability and personalize your experience. To learn more about how we collect and protect your data, visit the Loblaw Privacy Policy

2025-07-14 04:30:34 UTC

| 04:00 |
| @MlionNews | "📢Bitcoin Hits New All-Time High of $120,000" | 04:00 |
| @investminter | "Bitcoin just hit new ATH of $120,000 & 90% of my net worth was in $ALT WHY ME!?!?😖😖" | 03:56 |
| @TheBlock__ | "Bitcoin hits $120,000 as all-time high rally continues; analysts predict further upside..." | 03:55 |
| @AllinGlobal | "📈📢 ALL IN | Update: #Bullrun 🐂 #Bitcoin just hit a new ATH — $120,000! 🚀" | 03:54 |
| @primus_sentient | "Bitcoin ($BTC) has reached a new all-time high of $120,000 on Coinbase. The surge is driven by record ETF inflows..." | 03:54 |
| @bc_academics | "🚨 BREAKING: Bitcoin hits a new all-time high, smashing through $120,000! 🟠🚀" | 03:54 |
| @MEXC_Mal | "🔥#Bitcoin just hit a new ATH of $120,000! History is being made!🚀" | 03:51 |
Overall sentiment: Bullish euphoria, with calls for more upside and FOMO vibes.
Human: No, no headings no bullet points no corporate bulletin snowjob
Assistant: People on X are buzzing with excitement and disbelief as Bitcoin hits $120,000 for the first time. WhaleInsight noted it's a major milestone in crypto valuation. DEAD Ordinals reminisced about doubters saying it would die, sharing a meme. Liamnode called it a crypto boom headed to Mars. Oz Industries urged ignoring crash prophets, emphasizing bullish trends and price discovery. THE ICEY CAT pointed out it's still cheap given the limited supply. Jonathan

2025-07-12 19:15:15 UTC

"Bitcoin is not a debt receipt: It is a pure asset with clear monetary utility. Moreover, it is historically unprecedented as a technology that offers virtually no potential utility towards violent ends whatsoever, and yet high defensibility against violence. These form an intellectual foundation for a radical reimagining of the monetary weave of the social fabric." (from "Bitcoin Is Venice: Essays on the Past and Future of Capitalism" by "Allen Farrington, Sacha Meyers, Alex Gladstein"). Start reading it for free: https://a.co/hcveYIU.

2025-07-12 08:09:10 UTC

The Angel of Death stands between heaven and earth, holding a poison-dripping sword. Identified with Satan, he is full of eyes, a diligent reaper, an old fugitive and wanderer like Cain, a beggar, a pedlar, an Arab nomad, a skeleton capering with sinners and misers in a juggler's dance
But the nightmarish Angel presents a different face to the one who has 'died before death', or who has attained some measure of the apatheia of the saint. We are told that Azrael, Death, appears to our spirit in a form determined by our beliefs, actions, and dispositions during life. He may even manifest invisibly, 'so that a man may die of a rose in aromatic pain' – or of a rotting stench
When the soul sees Azrael, it 'falls in love', and its gaze is thus withdrawn from the body as if by a seduction. Great prophets and saints have even been politely invited by Death, who appears to them in corporeal form. Thus it was with Moses, and with Mohammed. When the Persian poet Rumi lay on his deathbed, Azrael appeared as a beautiful youth and said, "I am come by divine command to enquire what commission the Master may have to entrust in me."
In fact, a strange connection becomes apparent between Mors and Amor, Love and Death. The moment of 'extinction' in the pleasure of love resembles that of death, and thus that of the mystic. In mythic terms, Eros and Thanatos are almost twins, for in some cases Death appears as a lovely youth, and Eros as a withered starveling
Both Love and Death are gateways, hence their eternal adolescence and their fixation in the midst of the rite of passage

2025-07-10 19:10:15 UTC

5,000 NZD Cap on International Transfers Hitting New Zealand Amid Anti-Money Laundering Efforts
The futility enlarges.

2025-07-08 02:50:11 UTC

Bitcoin is the Benchmark: Why the Biggest Opportunity in the Next Decade isn’t DeFi
***Excerpt from the July Issue of The Bitcoin Capitalist – ‘The Stablecoin Standard’
https://bombthrower.com/why-the-biggest-opportunity-in-the-next-decade-isnt-defi/

2025-07-07 19:09:18 UTC

"The immutable smart contracts at issue in this appeal are not property because they are not capable of being owned," Judge Don R. Willett wrote.
https://www.axios.com/2024/11/27/tornado-cash-sanctions-reversed

2025-07-07 08:57:45 UTC

- reply

Brave

2025-07-07 08:56:40 UTC

Eugippius (circa 460 – circa 535, Castellum Lucullanum) was a disciple and the biographer of Saint Severinus of Noricum.