freethinkingperson

likes: Bitcoin, Family, Guns, God, Gold, Liberty, Respect of Right to Property, U.S. Constitution. dislikes: authoritarian intervention in everything, abuse of discretion, censorship. Past experience includes international development in a few countries, helping to completely retool the corporate onboarding process for a major exchange, and developing business strategy and forward thinking global regulatory strategy for one of the largest exchanges by 24-hour volume in the world.
AutoZap: https://www.zapplepay.com/autozap/npub1gw3phl4qrul5mre27zshty0n6m06p6thwugcr3362202e6xqhafsmt4pha

Public Key

npub1gw3phl4qrul5mre27zshty0n6m06p6thwugcr3362202e6xqhafsmt4pha

NIP-05 Address

freethinkingperson@vida.io

NIP-57 Address

LNURL1DP68GURN8GHJ7MRFVECXZ7FWD4JJ7TNHV4KXCTTTDEHHWM30D3H82UNVWQHKVUN9V46XS6TWDDEQS2DLXT

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsy8gsml6sp706d3u40pgt4j8eadhaqa9mhwyvpcca9984varqt75cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds609kfp

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1gw3phl4qrul5mre27zshty0n6m06p6thwugcr3362202e6xqhafsmt4pha

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-09-06 08:47:28

Hi, still alive and still here. The latest, I recently went to Humboldt County to visit a friend for a weekend (got away from the insanity of Car Week in Monterey Peninsula area), and am working on transitioning away from my current involvement in hardware store / supply chain work, by starting up my own online only ammunition and accessories store. It'll be run through AmmoReady and it's not live yet (still securing some business related licenses and getting the site up and running, and working on determining which distributors' products will be featured), but I will post a link when I eventually go live with it.

2024-04-15 09:40:13

- reply

Very cool, thanks for posting

2024-04-15 09:29:55

- reply

Wonder if there are tickets they have for people who want to go to Wyoming on this train.

2024-04-15 09:18:17

- reply

Nice.

2024-04-15 09:08:26

- reply

But they haven't acquired #bitcoin for reserves yet, have they?
Please read Softwar: A Novel Theory on Power Projection
and the National Strategic Significance of Bitcoin by Jason Lowery. He works for the U.S. Space Force, and his paper is published at: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/153030/lowery-jplowery-sm-sdm-2023-thesis.pdf

2024-04-15 08:55:08

Important read. Please oppose garbage like Reportinator and those that produce it. Thank you.
#nevent1q…56g0

2024-04-15 08:53:34

- reply

No, the goal of reportinator is to censor people via rating their speech and to create a twitter like experience from a ridiculous rabid left nut PoV. It's disgusting and wrong. Wasn't needed to begin with and isn't needed with any "tweaks" at all. It should be simply removed. We didn't have to endure it before, we shouldn't have to endure it now. You think there should be "many different reportinator" like services. I think there should be exactly zero. Stop polluting this space with crap.

2024-04-15 08:48:05

- reply

Welcome to the Nostr world!

2024-04-15 08:46:15

- reply

Ronin, your view on this is exactly correct. Thank you for voicing it.

2024-04-15 04:53:36

- reply

exactly. It's natural selection at work, really

2024-04-15 04:51:37

- reply

horrible

2024-04-15 04:48:42

The State, vs #bitcoin - if people are choosing the former to vote for, isn't this just an example of natural selection? If the actions of the State / different countries are so extreme that what results are not only an abundance of violent conflict but also the most innovative people leaving certain countries and regions (and even migrating away from earthbound jurisdictions into outer space, similar to Blockstream's method) then that's just the logical end result of smarter choices to migrate away from massively unstable systems and stupid people with too much power.

2024-01-18 08:40:06

Something through Nostr but also broadcast in outer space and designed to be a philanthropic development for people around the world, initially funded through https://geyser.fund/ and promoted via Market on Nostr / Coracle
https://www.thestatesman.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/081a66ac051fecf9b2e73567df11fea5.jpg

2024-01-12 06:46:27

- reply

Well, land has a cost, and I don't want to rent land outside of California, I want to buy... I think you get the picture.

2024-01-10 05:31:29

Broadcast the #bitcoin, fix the world
#nevent1q…yycp

2024-01-10 05:27:05

- reply

noice

2024-01-10 05:23:03

I traveled to El Salvador in December of 2023. If anyone is curious about how things are right now in the country (in terms of security, business friendliness, pros and cons, etc.) simply reply here with any questions and I'll let you know. I lived there for a few years in 1998 - 2000 and have been there a few times since then (the #bitcoin friendly policies being a really recent development). Currently am in one of the worst places in the world to exist as a bitcoin person: California. Hoping to leave California permanently soon.

2023-11-27 03:07:13

- reply

@nprofile…4j7h Interesting rationale, so if I were to accept your reasoning, which I don't, then essentially all wallet developers / teams would rapidly go defunct shortly after some layer of state pressure is exerted upon them to give up and fold. cc: @nprofile…r3pk @nprofile…c4n2 @nprofile…hy7r
By the way, see this: #nevent1q…5ec9

2023-11-24 09:55:52

Posting without comment
https://www.lettersofliberty.com/2023/11/20/argentina-elected-milei-who-has-become-the-worlds-first-anarcho-capitalist/

2023-11-24 09:48:51

@nprofile…hy7r @nprofile…jza3 @nprofile…ehng @nprofile…5ukj
Some questions: in light of the WoS fiasco, what are the current best non-custodial apps here people are using (that enable us to work using Lightning / Nostr) and what would be the best way to ensure that they continue to offered to a growing userbase (rather than restricted to less and less countries, people and places)?
Also: Are there some of the below apps below that you simple would recommend that I shouldn't use?
I'm currently using a variety of things, including:
- Strike https://strike.me/freethinkr
- Flamingo
- Vida (vida.io) -- https://vida.page/freethinkingperson
- LifPay -- https://lifpay.me/freethinkr
- Electrum (I have both mobile and desktop)
- Zeus (I have it on my phone but haven't figured out quite how to use it)
Note: I will also have MyNode running by end of 2023 (long before the US federal rule is finalized next year, at which point there is that question of whether or not the software will still be offered): https://mynodebtc.com/products/compare
I also confirmed with Trezor that the latest product which they shipped out to me, which was a limited run bitcoin only Trezor, would indeed have the coinjoin suite feature https://trezor.io/learn/a/what-is-coinjoin (This was a concern of mine as I wonder if it will be phased out in the future for US buyers)

2023-11-24 09:21:03

- reply

Hey @nprofile…5ukj
I will be in El Salvador Dec 20 - 27. Not sure if would be able to connect while I'm there but if so pm me here. Would be good to meet.

2023-11-24 09:11:21

- reply

It's the federal mixing rule (along with other things), which it seems they are refusing to fight in court (it hasn't been finalized yet, but it will be soon).
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/10/23/2023-23449/proposal-of-special-measure-regarding-convertible-virtual-currency-mixing-as-a-class-of-transactions
(Comment period on this ends in early 2024)
There is also an extremely strong anti-bitcoin (and anti-any-sort-of-digital-innovation) climate as a result of what is happening in the federal government in the United States right now. See recent SEC prosecutions, etc. This doesn't make it impossible for people to operate in the USA, but it does make it extraordinarily onerous and it does make it increasingly necessary for individuals and organizations to plan legal battles simply to continue to use decentralized, distributed, dis-intermediated systems in the United States.
Now, Wallet of Satoshi could ally with various other groups including pro-bitcoin groups that have had success at defending both industry groups and individuals from legal onslaughts.
Instead, @nprofile…yv3a is retreating with its tail between its legs.
Let me add that an organization that absconds from a state, I can understand. For example, Kraken removed itself from New York after New York decided to implement the NY bitlicense, which meant that individuals in New York would not be able to be served by Kraken, but that corporations that had been formed out of NY or individuals residing outside of NY would be able to be served by Kraken. At that time, Kraken had released a blog post which described in detail exactly why they were leaving New York and explicitly described Kraken's total opposition to the NY bitlicense. As time went on it was apparent that it was still possible that NY residents could be part of a corporation that was incorporated outside of NY and thus could be part of a business / corporate account on Kraken along with other corporate officers, although today a person residing in NY cannot have an account as an individual on Kraken. Since many exchanges withdrew from NY when NY implemented the bitlicense, I wonder how many exchanges will withdraw from serving clients in California when California's bitlicense (AB 39, now law) goes into effect in around a year's time. I hope many of them will, but there would be an enormous impact on the market if they do so and I don't think all of them would be willing to give up the money, they'd rather cave to California's demands.
So as I said, I think that it's understandable if an exchange (or a software business, or any kind of bitcoin oriented organization) decides it might not want to serve a particular state (because of licensing requirements they don't agree with, so long as THEY MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THAT'S THE REASON FOR WITHDRAWAL from that state). However, withdrawing from an entire COUNTRY seems ridiculous to me unless you are acknowledging that you simply aren't capable of serving the people in that country. Wallet of Satoshi's statement that they "will not serve" people in the USA is not acknowledging Wallet of Satoshi's own inability to figure out a way to serve people in the USA - rather, it's just a cop-out by saying they "will not serve" people in the USA.
Sound negative? Sure, but I'm just being honest.
Do better, Wallet of Satoshi.

2023-11-08 16:33:12

- reply

I like where you are going with this, @nprofile…44uu

2023-11-08 16:31:20

Think and do offline, broadcast online or find a generally offline system (like radio / non-internet method to broadcast)
#nevent1q…flhc

2023-11-01 18:35:52

Thought for today: "You are imperfect, you are wired for struggle, but you are worthy of love and belonging.” -- Brené Brown
Obviously not only solutions out there, but:
@nprofile…nanv (buy /DIY your own server)
@nprofile…j8hs (self-custodial wallet setup)
and MyNode (not sure if they have a Nostr yet but their website is here https://mynodebtc.com/products/compare

2023-11-01 17:49:00

"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" -- Quinam illi sunt, qui tam audaces sunt, ut abiiciendis vinculis conentur, ad easque potestates provocandas, qui eas assumunt, constanter ac violenter aggrediantur omnes, quos infra se esse arbitrantur? Quis enim spectabit homines, qui terribilem potentiam conducunt, et quid tum fit, cum homines non solum spectare potentes, sed decernere iam non ad virtutem pertinet? Hae interrogationes sibi respondent.

2023-10-27 21:41:02

- reply

Probably the one remaining piece is for me to get MyNode (the most expensive one I can bear) https://mynodebtc.com/products/compare since some of the features will cause the US gov to probably send letters to developers early next year saying "you can't sell this to US persons anymore" kicking off a years long litigation / battle. Not like I haven't run a node before, I have, but I'd like to have all the features shown in one thing and not have them chopped out because of "the fear next year." (There's a Community Edition MyNode available for free, but the advanced privacy features on that will be targeted by US gov next year too after the federal gov's new rule take effect, that's when the war will really get serious and those who want to stay in this game will have their will tested, it's really going to be time to say Fuck No, to the hard-headed asshats in Congress, White House and the Fed.) I also already ordered the special edition bitcoin-only Trezor (it's since sold out so I lucked out on that one).
Time to get busy I guess. No-one said this was supposed to be easy. (It has been relatively simple for years if you ask me, but with the fed AND state governments targeting it, that isn't going to drive me away, it'll just make me more interested in the technology, and in finding places that are more welcoming to me.)

2023-10-27 21:32:00

this >>
#nevent1q…s3ym

2023-10-27 20:59:48

Interesting article on the status / situation in El Salvador. Note: Bukele has registered to run for President again, but because of Salvadoran elections law and the Supreme Court decisions in El Salvador, it appears for him to run again (which he is doing), he will need to (at some point in the near future) step down (basically, take a break from office) at least six months before the next presidential term commences on June 1, 2024.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/el-salvador-bitcoin-news/beyond-bukele-sustaining-el-salvadors-orange-wave-of-freedom

2023-10-27 20:39:25

- reply

Happy to add a few little thoughts

2023-10-27 20:38:17

- reply

OVERLAP THOUGHTS:
Not radio, but television - ISDB-T /
(at this point, I think they are shifting to ISDB-T International/SBTVD (ISDB-Tb)) is used by El Salvador (a friendly jurisdiction), but is also used by a number of unfriendly jurisdictions as noted below - Brazil and Venezuela to name a couple. But it covers a lot of ground (countries in Central / South America, countries in Africa, some Asian countries). My thinking on this is that television is not as viable (because of the migration plans to different standards) but that radio and satellite (combination of the two) are viable.
The original TxTenna product / mesh product is perpetually sold out / unavailable, a different build (involving something we put together ourselves) to make the radio would be needed here. Some code referring to this functionality is at: https://github.com/MuleTools/txTenna

2023-10-27 08:42:48

- reply

“Where there is preparation there is no fear.” ~ Hwang Kee (1914 – 2002, Soo Bahk Do, Tang Soo Do Moo Duk Kwan) 황기 (당수도, 무덕관)
Some digging based on the information provided by @nprofile…avz8 and @nprofile…2hsh --
1. Digirig https://digirig.net/
2. Armoloq for digirig https://www.armoloq.com/ddm-dgrg
A protocol for offline bitcoin over radio (captured via internet archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20170221235057/http://betteroffbitcoin.com/a-protocol-for-offline-bitcoin-over-radio-transactions/
Concept for broadcasting bitcoin over television: https://web.archive.org/web/20160826195212/https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/kryptoradio-successfully-broadcasts-bitcoin-over-finnish-television-network/
Bitcointalk thread / discussion: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2183740.msg21906422#msg21906422
Additional / further thought stream / notes -
3. Decentralized identity system: https://github.com/cjbauer/idmas
4. Bitcoin over radio and television, and notes on overcoming censorship from Bisq issue discussion: https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/483#issuecomment-296042774
5. Old notes from the Ricardian contracts (for distributed currency exchange) as implemented in original OpenBazaar https://gist.github.com/drwasho/aa6ab79e92f2a876073e
for insurance contracts, https://gist.github.com/drwasho/352a565475a7f1e6dda0
for peer to peer lending, https://gist.github.com/drwasho/2c40b91e169f55988618
for physical goods, example https://gist.github.com/drwasho/a5380544c170bdbbbad8
and dispute resolution: https://gist.github.com/drwasho/405d51bd1b1a32e38145

2023-10-27 07:48:27

- reply

Thank you

2023-10-25 16:40:37

Are we still doing all caps?
I'VE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR FUCKING YEARS
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/from-cyberspace-to-outer-space-will-fiat-imperialism-push-mining-off-planet
#bitcoin #GrowNostr

2023-10-25 16:36:48

U.S. Federal Rule proposed against digital asset users, comments close 10/30 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/08/29/2023-17565/gross-proceeds-and-basis-reporting-by-brokers-and-determination-of-amount-realized-and-basis-for
Another U.S. federal rule proposed, (even more significant than the above), attacks mixing, lightning, more, comments close 1/22/2024: https://www.regulations.gov/document/FINCEN-2023-0016-0001
Please comment on both (as I'm sure these will both be rammed through to be finalized, but, any comments you make in these can be used in later court cases challenging the rules to oppose and possibly overturn them). In the meantime as I've mentioned before, innovators should consider (if they haven't already) prioritizing their activity elsewhere (other than the USA - in other countries and / or in space similar to what Blockstream has done).

2023-10-25 16:26:44

- reply

see also #nevent1q…8hrm

2023-10-25 16:20:13

- reply

I mean yes, the only difference I have with what you just posted is the BILLIONS WERE MORE THAN THAT

2023-10-25 16:15:31

- reply

Is there a recommended post or page you have about FLDigi where I could best learn more (incl recommended gear and your thoughts on how to link w/ bitcoin / nostr)? What are protocols for use?

2023-10-25 00:52:10

- reply

Assume the following situation (or similar situation in which numerous people are affected):
- State level (not just attacks from a couple states, like CA or NY, but major state level attacks from different countries) on different users of Bitcoin / Nostr, including developers (Assume for the sake of argument this happens outside of an apocalypse when the state still has resources and means to harass individuals)
- U.S. crime creation (criminalization of use of lightning, coinjoin, etc.) by regulation or law
- More or less this occurs while multiple countries engage in escalation of conflict which results in the complete disabling of infrastructure (most satellites downed, others rendered mostly useless due to orbital debris fields, land based electrical networks in most cases are unavailable, most communication is gone for at least a time with the exception of some radio and television stations)
- The known network of users you are able to communicate with and discover is reduced to a small quantity (10 - 15) in different parts of the region near you (or globe depending on your communication capacity), but your ability to transact with them is limited by the finite amount of time and energy you can devote to it to ensure your own safety in the process
How would you restore and expand the network to put it on a path to growth?

2023-10-25 00:34:15

ICYMI:
1. California's Gov. Newsom signed AB 39 (California's bitlicense) into law. If you think this won't impact you, you are wrong. This is a profoundly negative development for those who had hoped that the State of California might ultimately take a turn, learn, and become more welcoming to innovators, bitcoin developers and just thoughtful human beings in general. It was not to be. California is a shit heap with no redeeming quality, and its legislators will soon drive out those who have tried to make it a better place.
2. Odysee posted a thoroughly depressing post, but worth a read about the impact of the U.S. SEC on certain business models. It's titled "The End of Lbry Inc" and describes not only what will happen to Lbry, Inc., but what will happen to Odysee and the content of Odysee users. https://odysee.com/@lbry:3f/theendoflbryinc:d
3. There is a proposed U.S. federal rule that targets a huge swath of, well, basically everything. This includes not only coinjoins as they are classically understood but anything which could be understood by the U.S. government to be "mixing." You'll need to read this to understand why this regulatory proposal is so dangerous but like many developments of regulatory overreach, this proposed rule being rammed through is clearly targeting every bitcoin user and would certainly impact those utilizing 2nd layer (lightning) technology. I recommend you take the time to comment on it. Comments close on 1/22/2024, and even if the comments are largely disregarded the comments in the record can later be used by plaintiffs (those challenging any finalized rule) in a bid to overturn the federal rule in court once it becomes final. https://www.regulations.gov/document/FINCEN-2023-0016-0001
The message that is being given by these clearly anti-innovation regulators is that they don't want bitcoin development or any innovation or even use of bitcoin to exist in the United States, even as growth of use occurs with bitcoin, value of the dollar continues to decrease and value of the bitcoin relative to the dollar continues to increase. But this is not so much the point, we know that when activities we want to perform become prohibitive or at least highly restricted in one place, we can shift gears and do them elsewhere where we are welcomed. That said, we should speak out against what the state of California, New York and U.S. federal government are doing.
#bitcoin #lightning #GrowNostr #awareness

2023-10-20 06:25:51

"No, it is a word. What matters is the connection the word implies. I see that you are in love. Can you tell me what you'd give to hold on to that connection?"
https://github.com/ABISprotocol

2023-10-20 06:24:38

- reply

Not decentralized at all. I'd argue the true decentralized exchange was developed prior to the development of today's Bisq and was in fact the original version of OpenBazaar (there was an element within it which allowed for true decentralized exchange). There are many so-called "decentralized" exchanges today, but arguably the only ones that can be considered decentralized are those that don't require anyone to register or sign up in order to use it, and are based on bitcoin (bitcoin native applications and/or systems).
None of the so-called "decentralized" exchanges here are in fact decentralized, for example: https://github.com/distribuyed/index
Here's an interesting issue in github (for Bitcoin), which was long ago closed.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10494
Relating to decentralized exchange development.
The following is not my personal view but is added for context. The organization known as CATO believes that "Congress should amend the Securities Exchange Act at 15 U.S.C. Section 78c and the Commodity Exchange Act at 7 U.S.C. Section 1a to include the following:
Decentralized crypto [commodity/ security] exchanges mean any market places or facilities for purchasing, selling, or trading crypto [commodity/ security] tokens, where such market places or facilities:(A) Are materially and substantially composed of permissionless, self‐ executing smart contracts written in publicly auditable, open‐ source code;(B) Do not rely on custodial intermediaries;(C) Allow for the continuous public retrieval of their transaction histories;(D) Do not have outstanding, or possess on behalf of the market places or facilities, administrative privileges or tokens conferring protocol governance rights, such that any person or unified group maintains discretionary, decisive, and practical control over any final decision to substantially change the functionality of the market places or facilities. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ministerially implementing changes resulting from a non‐ discretionary governance process shall not be construed, without more, as evidence of such control; and(E) Do not make to end users any implicit or explicit promises of performance, extrinsic to computer code, without which such decentralized crypto [commodity/ security] exchanges would not operate or produce their promised benefits. Notwithstanding the foregoing, representations over a front‐ end graphical user interface that do not materially differ from a reasonable articulation of the functionality of the exchange’s underlying software shall not be construed, without more, as such promises of performance." Source: https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/regulatory-clarity-crypto-marketplaces-part-i-decentralized-exchanges#defining-decentralized-exchanges

2023-10-16 16:41:33

A reflection on California's AB 857 (2016) - a law passed to suppress the act of people being able to freely build unregistered arms in their home - and California's more recent AB 39 (2023), a law which aspires to force registration of nearly every digital currency user. (The following is an overview of some of the court cases which have touched on the issues that problematic and common to both laws, as both legislate 'prior restraint.') My apology in advance for this long note.
The first notable case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled on a prior restraint issue was Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931). In that case the Court held prior restraint to be unconstitutional, except in extremely limited circumstances such as national security issues. In that case, with respect to the Minnesota Gag Law of 1925, also known as The Public Nuisance Law, the United States Supreme Court ruled, ""The statute in question cannot be justified by reason of the fact that the publisher is permitted to show, before injunction issues, that the matter published is true and is published with good motives and for justifiable ends. ... it would be but a step to a complete system of censorship. ... The preliminary freedom, by virtue of the very reason for its existence, does not depend, as this court has said, on proof of truth. (Patterson v. Colorado, 205 U.S. 454, 462)". (...) "(T)he protection even as to previous restraint is not absolutely unlimited. But the limitation has been recognized only in exceptional cases."
These prior restraint issues later made their way into the world of computer code. One of Electronic Frontier Foundation's first major legal victories was Bernstein v. Department of Justice, paving the way for international e-commerce.
The court eventually ruled that the export control laws on encryption violated Bernstein's First Amendment rights by prohibiting his constitutionally protected speech, leading to regulatory changes that made it easier to publish encryption software online without the approval of the US government. Along the way, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel in the Northern District of California issued the crucial first ruling that found that "code is speech" and so is protected by the First Amendment in the United States.
"This court can find no meaningful difference between computer language, particularly high-level languages as defined above, and German or French....Like music and mathematical equations, computer language is just that, language, and it communicates information either to a computer or to those who can read it..."
-Judge Patel, April 15, 1996
Similarly, when people share code with the ultimate intention of conveying technical information that will enable two parties to communicate about a possible "build," or share ideas about the "build" in the context of home built weapons development, whether they are editing CAD files, utilizing a 3-D printer, or merely finishing metal parts by drilling them out to completion with a drill press and other tools while referencing the code and technical information, this is speech and it is protected expression. The case of Defense Distributed vs. U.S. Department of State, addressed some of these issues. By around the middle of 2018, after several years in the Defense Distributed case, and a negotiated settlement, Cody Wilson and Defense Distributed were free to upload designs of working firearms to the internet; those files are legal to own and share, and the resulting weapons are legal to own. Defense Distributed and DEFCAD have continue to distribute those files.
In like manner, if someone who is a builder and owner of one of these pieces, decides voluntarily that he or she wishes to engrave a mark (or potentially a serial number) on the finished lower receiver that he or she has built, or on other pieces, that is speech and it is protected expression, and it would be illegal to prevent this form of speech by engaging in the type of prior restraint that AB 857 (2016) (current California law) mandates.
The demands proposed by AB 857 that we apply to the Department of Justice for a unique serial number "or other mark of identification" have no basis in reality and as mentioned are a form of prior restraint that unconstitutionally would keep us as builders and owners from expressing ourselves as we see fit.
The demands proposed by the State of California that people apply for a permit and register with the State to use bitcoin or other systems under what is now law (AB 39 (2023) [California's bitlicense], set to take effect July 2025), are no different. These ideas are unconstitutional and meritless.
Finally, I think it is an important note that the soldiers in WWII did not fight the Nazis so that fascist schemes could later be upheld which would mimic Nazi behavior. A brief review of history is in order to remind us of why we should avoid gun registration schemes - or bitlicense schemes such as those adopted by California and New York.
In 1932, Alfred Flatow registered his handguns, as decreed by the harsh gun control laws of the Weimar Republic drawn up amid the chaos of aftermath of WWI.
The first assault on the Republic came not from the right but from the communist left. German Communists attempted to overthrow the government by armed struggle. The government mobilized the Freikorps, which murdered the Communist leaders.
Hoping to stem further attacks on the state, the Weimar Republic imposed draconian gun control laws that made it punishable by death to carry a gun.
The Weimar Ministry of the Interior made gun registration mandatory. Although the Weimar Ministry of the Interior worked to assure registrants that their information would remain safe, this proved to be an empty promise. When Nazis took over in 1933, the information was culled for registrants who were deemed "enemies of the state," a euphemism for Jews, communists, and other political opponents.
Gestapo legal adviser Werner Best proposed to execute Jews who were found in possession of firearms.
In 1938, in preparation for Kristallnacht (November 9-10, 1938), the Gestapo used Weimar gun registration records to disarm Jews and focused on Jewish gun owners for deportation to concentration camps. Alfred Flatow fled Germany for the Netherlands, but when Nazis invaded the Netherlands, in May 1940, Flatow was on the Gestapo's list.
Flatow was arrested and sent to Theresienstadt Concentration Camp, where he died from starvation on December 28, 1942. His cousin Gustav died in the same camp three years later.
If you believe it is impossible for these kinds of things to happen here in the USA, you are wrong. It has happened before - 1942-1946 with Japanese-American internment, for example - and it could easily happen again, given today's political conversations and attempts in D.C. to to put gun owners on so-called "terrorist watchlists." Indeed, with express provisions in California law stipulating that 100,000 dollars would be a penalty for the State's interpretation that you didn't meet what they felt was compliance with the law, this is a clear sign that anyone who has any innovative or logical business use of bitcoin or cryptocurrency will soon be on a California watchlist.
In 2017, the California Legislature attempted to use a law and the state's own staff to censor speech of a blogger who posted the publicly available names and addresses of legislators who routinely attacked the rights of Californians. The Legislature's anti-speech law and its attempt to infringe upon basic First Amendment rights were stricken down by the California Eastern District Court, which ruled on Feb. 27, 2017 in Publius v. Boyer-Vine that “content-based laws — those that target speech based on its communicative content — are presumptively unconstitutional.” That court decision was not appealed and the nature of the decision was to provide a remedy for problems caused by prior restraint actions of the State which violate the 1st Amendment exercise.
There is no question that California's AB 39 (2023) is a content-based law that targets not only bitcoin but other digital assets which are used not only for transactional purposes but as a means of expression – as a form of speech. That the transactional purpose and the speech happen at the same time does not extinguish the 1 st Amendment protection that is enjoyed by network participants. California's attempt to target an entire economy and entire networks of individuals via its efforts to pass AB 39 (which is now law) is in fact a violation of the judgment of the California Eastern District Court which made quite clear that “content-based laws-- those that target speech based on its communicative content – are presumptively unconstitutional.” And thus, AB 39 is presumptively unconstitutional.
In the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision known as Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas, seen at https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-96_5i36.pdf it is noted that this Supreme Court decision is not just about wine, but that commercial actions cannot be turned into prohibited acts by a state. Quote follows from the decision: "More recently, we observed that our dormant Commerce Clause cases reflect a “‘central concern of the Framers that was an immediate reason for calling the Constitutional Convention: the conviction that in order to succeed, the new Union would have to avoid the tendencies toward economic Balkanization that had plagued relations among the Colonies and later among the States under the Articles of Confederation.’” Granholm, 544 U. S., at 472 (quoting Hughes v. Oklahoma, 441 U. S. 322, 325–326 (1979)). In light of this history and our established case law, we reiterate that the Commerce Clause by its own force restricts state protectionism." ..."And Granholm never said that its reading of history or its Commerce Clause analysis was limited to discrimination against products or producers. On the contrary, the Court stated that the Clause prohibits state discrimination against all “‘out-of-state economic interests,’” Granholm, 544 U. S., at 472 (emphasis added), and noted that the direct-shipment laws in question “contradict[ed]” dormant Commerce Clause principles because they “deprive[d] citizens of their right to have access to the markets of other States on equal terms.” Id., at 473 (emphasis added)."
Given this long record I have cited of both California court decisions against prior restraint, California court decisions in favor of code as speech, and US Supreme Court decisions which bar states from creating blanket prohibitions of commerce, there is no logic whatsoever to anything like either California's AB 857 (2016) or California's AB 39 (2023) [the California bitlicense, now law]. While both would have to be challenged in court, we cannot hold our breath waiting for this to happen. We can resist these ill-founded ideas only so long as it is economically sustainable, but I propose also that people safely continue their innovative work from elsewhere - in a place they will not be prosecuted for doing so.
cc: @ODELL @nprofile…4eel @nprofile…h30r

2023-10-16 09:20:35

- reply

Not just in the UK, see also California and the USA fedgov. #nevent1q…2zap
cc: @nprofile…hw25 @nprofile…xw7p @nprofile…9dwd @nprofile…u770 @nprofile…uf3r @nprofile…5drx @Ivan @nprofile…pqmx @nprofile…7l3n @nprofile…48p4 @nprofile…h30r @nprofile…h4pr Some countries / jurisdictions are actively choosing to be left behind.

2023-10-16 00:35:01

This resonates with me, it hearkens back to the spirit of what I felt bitcoin was supposed to be about, at the time when I first found out about it.
#nevent1q…wqup

2023-10-16 00:32:09

- reply

More on this.... This is one of those "notes of dismay" I wish that either CEOs of exchanges, lead developers, etc. would see, but many of them aren't on / don't currently use Nostr. If they don't that's their choice, but I think it would be helpful if they did.
#nevent1q…2zap

2023-10-16 00:27:26

- reply

Interesting. I haven't used twitter in.... forever, and only recently logged back on after maybe a year or more, to ask a few exchange CEOs or exchange advisors what their / their company's stance would be on AB 39 (the California bitlicense). Would be nice if they were here (actually, some of them are but they are not that active here). Example being @nprofile…6mdy who has an account here but who I think hasn't checked around Nostr in a while.
I don't plan on logging back into twitter again. Might check it in another year or something but I don't spend time there anymore.

2023-10-15 20:45:18

"Peacemaker" by Jim Baruffi
https://allpoetry.com/poem/12745612-peacemaker-by-jim-baruffi

2023-10-15 20:41:17

war is a game for the dumb, the only way to win is not to play
But in today's world, everyone is compelled to be at least indirectly implicit, one must not be delusional. It takes a bit of work to opt out of it.

2023-10-15 04:27:52

I'm profoundly dismayed that California has, with a stroke of a pen from Newsom, after the Legislature acted against the will of Californians, to, by Governor Newsom's despicable act, signed AB 39 (California's bitlicense bill, conceptually a copy of the ideas put into place in New York which resulted in the NY bitlicense) into law.
In 2022, California's bitlicense bill was reborn once again in a bill called AB 2269 introduced by Grayson (basically the same bill that we have seen signed into law on Friday the 13th, 2023 as AB 39), but AB 2269 was vetoed by the Governor, so it did not become law last year. Regardless of changes that have been made to the bill, AB 39 (which this year, sadly did become law) suffers from the same flawed thinking as did AB 2269 in 2022, and prior Bitlicense proposals which included AB 1489 in 2019-2020, AB 1123 in 2017-2018, and AB 1326 in 2015-2016 (all of which were prior versions of California's proposed bitlicense bills that we defeated).
California simply is not a place for bitcoin proponents to continue to exist or innovate. The law takes effect in July 1, 2025, so it does give people time to prepare to leave the state, or country.
But California is not the only bitcoin unfriendly jurisdiction here. As we all know, the United States has become worse and worse for those who are innovators and who are bitcoin friendly. Most recently, the IRS has proposed a rule, which would expand the definitions of “digital assets” and “broker" to include almost everyone. This federal proposal would pull in people and projects who would not otherwise fall within the scope of these tax reporting obligations. These new brokers (essentially, almost everyone) would be required to collect personal information of users – including their name, address and tax identification number – and then furnish them with a form 1099 to help calculate the gains and losses for the digital asset sales that the brokers helped “facilitate.” This rule is simply designed to discourage digital innovators and participants in bitcoin (and other systems as well, though bitcoin is the obvious target). The comment period on the proposal ends October 30, 2023.
The overview of the proposed rule mentions the term "specified security" 17 times. It is written so as to interpret digital assets and private keys not as your property but instead, to create a rule which interprets them as the property of the state via a contorted definition of "specified securities."
The Treasury and the IRS are assuming certain assets are in fact "specified securities." They also are calling certain assets out as both "specified securities" and "digital assets," adding new reporting requirements for some and delaying new reporting for others.
Reading through this proposal you will find sections that indicate that the treatment of their dual wielding of specified securities and digital assets is intended to be applied primarily against "brokers" once they finalize this rule. But who the will be a broker (who will the rule apply to)? EVERYONE.You are a broker! He's a broker! She's a broker! We're all brokers! /s (Not in my universe - all I have to do is stop operating in this loathsome jurisdiction, and believe me there is more than one way to do that.)The proposed rule would read:"the definition of broker for purposes of section 6045 includes digital asset trading platforms, digital asset payment processors, certain digital asset hosted wallet providers, and persons who regularly offer to redeem digital assets that were created or issued by that person. In addition, these proposed regulations would require real estate reporting persons to report on real estate purchasers who use digital assets to acquire real estate in a reportable real estate transaction and extend the information that must be reported under § 1.6045–4 with respect to sellers of real estate to include the fair market value of digital assets received by sellers in exchange for real estate. Additionally, in the case of a transaction involving the exchange of digital assets for goods (other than digital assets) or services, these proposed regulations treat the provision of the goods or services as reportable under section 6050W and the disposition of the digital assets as reportable under proposed § 1.6045–1 and not under section 6050W...."This vastly oversimplifies what they are doing in their reckless disregard for U.S. persons and our property. The actual proposed rule contains a lot more detail, and is far more complex and loathsome than my pitiful summary suggests.
Overview: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/treasury-and-irs-issue-proposed-regulations-on-reporting-by-brokers-for-sales-or-exchanges-of-digital-assets-new-steps-designed-to-end-confusion-help-taxpayers-aid-high-income-compliance-workPage to submit comment by Oct 30, 2023 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/08/29/2023-17565/gross-proceeds-and-basis-reporting-by-brokers-and-determination-of-amount-realized-and-basis-for
These attacks by both California and the federal government on innovators and bitcoin participants are truly pitiful and will simply cause real advancement and meaningful progress to happen elsewhere in the world, or even in low earth orbit. Keep on building, friends, even if it is difficult to do. There simply may be a few less places to easily do it in, but others will be far more welcoming.#bitcoin #lightning #GrowNostr

2023-10-13 22:12:08

Hello peeps, plebs, humans, and whoever else is reading,
I had this idea that I might could invite people over to Monterey / Big Sur area for a Collaboranza. As it so happens I live in Monterey, California and I frequent Big Sur. What would be the purpose of this? To generate some new ideas based on our experiences and to get to know each other a bit. This is a note to kick off the discussion thread, if you are interested. You can also private message if you prefer. Dates would have sometime in 2024 (probably Feb or March, maybe?) due to that I am taking off for El Salvador from Dec 20-27 of 2023. #bitcoin #lightning #GrowNostr #ideas #collaborative #thoughtprocess #collaboranza

2023-10-11 08:47:53

this:
#nevent1q…rmcy

2023-10-11 08:43:09

" Every night and every morn', Some to misery are born, Every morn' and every night, Some are born to sweet delight, Some are born to sweet delight, Some are born to endless night."
https://www.tasteofcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/dead-man-original.jpg

2023-10-11 08:25:49

- reply

Thanks, I will send a message there with the experience, I think there is a UX/UI hiccup.

2023-10-11 08:24:05

- reply

I was able to get the Alby browser extension going after a little nudging. Thanks for the tip, I'll be exploring it.

2023-10-09 22:10:05

- reply

- Alby allows me to sign up
- gets to a page where I can request a one time code
- I enter the email and hit enter
- I then get the message "Connection failed (Alby client was not initialized)"
- Tried doing it also with Brave shields down for the page to see if that was the issue, the problem repeated
This is all in Brave, interestingly enough I didn't have an issue with getting Flamingo up and running

2023-10-09 00:16:33

- reply

yeah I think it was either early (Jan-Feb 2022) or sometime before then - may have actually been in the prior year since I was fiddling around with it prior to that if my fuzzy memories are correct - anyway just wanted to say Thanks

2023-10-08 23:34:42

Just set up Vida which is one way I can receive bitcoin via lightning for my expertise, a well thought out method of simple connection of the professional with a potential payment method. https://vida.page/freethinkingperson

2023-10-08 23:06:45

- reply

I hope it will get stormy in them there cosmos

2023-10-08 23:04:30

- reply

hey Stuart, just wanted to say hello, just fyi it was like a year or maybe a year and a half ago or something like that, I chanced upon satellite.earth really quite by accident, not sure what I was looking for but it was truly interesting and wanted to say thank you

2023-10-08 18:09:40

- reply

So, I envision that there will be space based, or perhaps low earth orbit satellites which will periodically be used as a jurisdictional buffer to transmit gifts of bitcoin to people who need it anywhere on the planet regardless of location.
Originally this idea was sent in English and Russian via Blockstream Satellite (message paid for via lightning) -
Transmission ID documenting text of idea (3423 bytes sent to satellites 3/16/2022, approx. 10 a.m. PST): 11a4d87e-6750-4659-9bde-fd464c15c877
I've had some recent conversations with cryptosat (cryptosat.io) including an initial virtual meeting, and would need to send them a proposal for cost and funding of the plan. I may end up doing part of the funding for the small sat by setting up a project proposal in Geyser (Geyser.fund which is funded through lightning and which one can authenticate to via, for example, Flamingo or Alby).
#GrowNostr

2023-10-08 11:42:57

a few observations, although it's not the way I'd measure the value of bitcoin, it does seem to be worth mentioning
1. https://charts.woobull.com/bitcoin-price-models/
2. https://charts.woobull.com/bitcoin-risk-adjusted-return/
#nevent1q…e3mp

2023-10-08 11:31:39

Had some problems with Alby (didn't authorize / start up etc. in Brave). Flamingo (Nostr extension) worked fine right out of the gate. I was then able to enter my pre-existing nsec (privkey) into Flamingo and from there, authenticate into Geyser.fund using Flamingo. At that point I did a test transaction (donation to a project someone created / featured in Geyser, using lightning) and it worked fine. To create a project in Geyser or to donate to someone's project, you have to authenticate to Geyser using Flamingo, or Alby, based on what I can tell.

2023-10-08 10:56:04

- reply

currently password reset doesn't work w/ brave browser for nodeless

2023-10-07 19:16:58

- reply

@nprofile…x6r7 @nprofile…j8hs It would be interesting to see this used for advocacy, for example, to give bitcoin via lightning to the CA Governor / Governor's staff embedded in messages sent against AB 39 / asking for a veto of AB 39. Or when advocating against other anti-bitcoin bills, the same thing, sending bitcoin gifts along with the message so that all legislators receive the gifts regardless of their views.

2023-10-07 19:06:26

will be trying this out a bit later on this evening
#nevent1q…pjz3

2023-10-07 00:52:05

- reply

great thing you did with nodeless, I am exploring it now

2023-10-06 22:58:54

- reply

Consistent with this (Soviet Memes), here's one that is ripe for adoption, seems to me there is an area on his chest where a bit bitcoin symbol could go if one were to modify / appropriate the propaganda.
Note: "Esli zavtra voyna" = If there's a war tomorrow (old Soviet film).
https://image.nostr.build/6145f05913f678a1faaf2e98ee965899e361d1c3d8cbc6ab0b6d288c74f8043d.jpg

2023-10-06 22:40:45

this is the way
#nevent1q…p973

2023-10-06 21:50:48

- reply

OK, interesting, I can't zap my own note / post! So I just figured that out. interesting

2023-10-06 21:48:52

going to do a really dumb experiment to see if I can zap my own note without something going wrong. It's probably an utterly silly experiment but I'm just curious to see if it behaves differently than the other zaps I've recently done

2023-10-06 19:40:16

- reply

thank you!

2023-10-06 17:57:35

- reply

ty!

2023-10-06 17:49:23

Currently looking at / examining these:
https://getalby.com/
https://www.getflamingo.org/
https://github.com/fiatjaf/nos2x
and
https://geyser.fund/
etc

2023-10-06 07:24:57

- reply

Yes, the idea they have is to target basically everyone possible with a NY-similar bitlicense scheme and to drive people away that have a shred of logic. These same bills have been defeated before in past years (brief summary below).
In 2022, California's bitlicense bill was reborn once again in a bill called AB 2269 introduced by Grayson (basically the same bill that we are seeing today with the AB 39 proposal), but AB 2269 was vetoed by the Governor. That didn't stop Grayson of course, he came back with the same bill repackaged as AB 39 this year. Regardless of any small changes that have been made to the bill since last year, AB 39 suffers from the same flawed thinking as did AB 2269 in 2022, AB 1489 in 2019-2020, AB 1123 in 2017-2018, and AB 1326 in 2015-2016 (all versions of California's proposed bitlicense bills we have defeated): The fact remains that AB 39 is a bill intended to suppress legitimate business in California.
As such, California will lose revenue if AB 39 becomes law, and more importantly it will lose innovators and the ability to legally support critical innovation (such as bitcoin development and business that associates itself with the same). That technological innovation WON'T STOP HAPPENING, it will just happen somewhere else other than California.
In 2016, AB 1326 (arguably the earliest version of the proposed California bitlicense) was opposed by at least 17 organizations formally as well as being opposed by hundreds of thousands of individuals, which led not only to its defeat but the defeat of other bills like it. And when bitlicense was enacted in New York, to describe the effect there, many companies simply stopped serving New York clients.
As of the date and time of this reply here, AB 39 has not yet been signed or vetoed by the California Governor.

2023-10-05 14:21:30

- reply

That's definitely inspiring. Look at what happens when people get out of each other's way and truly help one another.

2023-10-05 14:15:01

Check out https://opensats.org/ and https://sovereignengineering.io -- h/t @nprofile…4eel
Also -- if you are in California -- heads up, the Governor there has until October 14 (a few short days) to sign or veto AB 39 (an anti-bitcoin, anti-innovation 'bitlicense' bill) into law, and if he does nothing it will become law. If you have a spare moment please send him a note opposing AB 39 at below link: https://www.gov.ca.gov/contact/

2023-10-05 13:51:07

- reply

lifpay.me - I have this on my phone

2023-10-05 13:49:27

- reply

aha! thank you

2023-10-05 12:25:45

- reply

I used to work for a major crypto exchange (one of the top several by 24 hour volume in the world). Went from building up social to developing the corporate onboarding to eventually being asked (by the CEO) to develop strategy for the whole company. Well, there was a member of the strategy team who felt that Libra was the future, that it was the greatest thing since sliced bread, that the company should do everything in its power to work with FB / Libra team to eventually "list Libra." I was vocally against this (as well as other shitcoin proposals that went nowhere, or went somewhere but ultimately went down in flames). Sure enough, these (Libra etc) concepts were meritless. They have to be evaluated on their merits, not based on whether or not someone is merely excited about them because of shilling by interest groups or the idea of short-term profits. And the vast majority of them are without merit based on any standard. Bitcoin on the other hand is without question useful to all without question.

2023-10-05 12:13:46

- reply

I find this interesting, where I can I go to find out more?

2023-10-05 12:11:25

- reply

Interesting article. I'd like to see you write one on either net outmigration from states like California or new frontiers of diaspora into avenues of technology in space / low earth orbit.

2023-10-05 12:05:34

- reply

Nostrocket.org is interesting, I have a question.
Can I participate / authenticate to it somehow using simply LifPay? Or is this not possible.

2023-10-04 08:51:40

- reply

I was going to say Lifpay but someone beat me to it.

2023-10-04 08:50:09

- reply

This is very good thank you and I'll be watching closely, implications for creating one's own "mint system"

2023-10-04 08:46:37

- reply

Something doesn't feel good about that, no, and I think they should offer a choice of custodian (either let people choose a different custodian and / or offer the option of self-custody).

2023-10-04 08:45:04

- reply

that's horrible, I had wondered who had owned it and hadn't quite had time to dig in. Looks like that is just the worst. Thanks for the clarification

2023-10-04 08:43:06

- reply

Graphene OS ftw

2023-10-04 08:38:44

- reply

Still an amazing idea... I have some thoughts as to how this could be thoughtfully utilized

2023-10-04 08:37:08

Trajectories..
#nevent1q…er6t

2023-10-04 08:34:15

- reply

you would definitely appreciate Castle Crags (a great climbing spot in Northern California)

2023-10-02 00:41:52

- reply

what are your thoughts on the implications of ghost in the shell for modern ideas around identity / elements of the same

2023-10-02 00:38:00

- reply

Aren't we all compost eventually, or at least, part of us?

2023-10-01 23:48:59

- reply

Out of sheer curiosity, have you seen Geyser, as in geyser.fund (?) I have examined it a bit but can't yet authenticate to it (not using lifpay at least).

2023-09-16 00:57:47

Up in Santa Lucia Mountains, heading into the Ventana Wilderness / Los Padres NF, that's a great place to be. Some photos.
https://gab.com/freethinkingperson/posts/111007889618555621

2023-09-15 23:51:06

So, "Away from Nostr" / off of Coracle (I guess for now, I'm using Coracle, which seems to work), I was using LinkedIn a bit today to reach out by private message to some CEOs of bitcoin focused companies, to urge them to ask CA's Governor Newsom to veto AB 39 (the latest of the California bitlicense bills, which has passed the Legislature). I've harped on this before here, but AB 39 (and SB 401 as well which is mentioned in AB 39 by reference) would be horrible for people, even those who aren't in California.
OK, that's all for now. <shrugs>

2023-09-15 23:46:19

- reply

I hope not.

2023-09-11 07:23:30

Reposting without comment.
#nevent1q…muyh