Iris K. Vaughan

Passionnée de pop culture, j'écris sur les séries depuis 16 ans et anime des podcasts depuis 11 ans. Féministe intersectionelle et ND, j'aborde également ces sujets partout où on m'en donne l'occasion.

Maman d'un petit chat, Charlie Kelly-Vaughan.

https://linktr.ee/iriskv
https://ko-fi.com/iriskv

"It's TV; it's comfort. It's a friend you've known so well, and for so long you just let it be with you"

#television #popculture #writer

Public Key

npub1e3mrqf626kt273e670fe67qqa356kat37e992vn4zhsvyn3ad2aqua26u7

NIP-05 Address

iriskv_at_piaille.fr@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsvca3sya9dt940gua085ua0qqwc6dtw4clvjj4xf63tcxzfc7k4wspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dstx2ez8

Publishing to

offchain.pub

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1e3mrqf626kt273e670fe67qqa356kat37e992vn4zhsvyn3ad2aqua26u7

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-12-12 23:10:11 UTC

- reply

is this the new white vs blue dress ?

2024-12-12 22:21:04 UTC

- reply

I see it

2024-12-11 01:04:45 UTC

- reply

this is more disappointing to me than the Game of Thrones finale was to the fans.

2024-12-11 00:59:37 UTC

- reply

does it also end with the quote in the first post for you? Sorry wondering if it's really that short

2024-12-01 16:21:37 UTC

- reply

and why try to paint me as a fucking fascist when I literally used quotation marks because yes, in the book they are seen by the dictatorship as undesirables ????

2024-12-01 16:20:31 UTC

- reply

I am asking again, answer in good faith please.
1) If you think we were saying the same thing, why say "there must have been a conclusion early on because we were both talking about the same thing"?why say something vague that shares the blame when it was you being confused and replying with everything I had just said, paraphrasing my own reply to me, except with the part that actually matters the most ?
2) Why tell me no, the book doesn't erase black people by never mentioning them, when the point of my original reply (of which you say now "we were saying the same thing") is precisely that it erases them and doesn't mention their existence?

2024-12-01 16:08:56 UTC

- reply

seriously, are you a troll account?

2024-12-01 16:07:19 UTC

- reply

I use that term between quotation marks because that is how THEY perceive them

2024-12-01 16:03:59 UTC

- reply

I swear to you, there is *no* mention of POC in the book, they do name the "undesirables" you mention, but no, they do not at any point mention POC. I wrote a Master's thesis about that very topic.
And if we were saying the same thing, I really don't understand why you repeated everything I had said in your reply to me as if you were saying something new ?

2024-12-01 15:43:34 UTC

- reply

hey, I see you replying to other people, I'm sorry if my replies seem a bit annoyed, but I really don't understand where you stand. What did I miss? Why did you reply, apparently correcting me, but repeating everything I had just said ? And then say "I was talking about the book" when I said twice I also was, and had said the same thing you did right before you ?

2024-12-01 14:36:15 UTC

- reply

... which is something I realize I did say in my first message, yet you replied to me as if you're contradicting me all the while saying every single thing I already said.

2024-12-01 14:28:10 UTC

- reply

oh and no they don't "kill POC" at the beginning of the book. There is no mention of any POC anywhere in the book. No mention of anything related to race. They were not killed at the beginning of the book. They simply do not exist and never existed. Atwood steals from their experience and doesn't even acknowledges a single thing about race. It's erasure and appropriation plain and simple

2024-12-01 14:24:45 UTC

- reply

the fact you're what, dismissing my comment because "you're talking about the book" when I literally told you I wrote about the book (and tv show) in my first and second message... Lol.

2024-12-01 14:23:35 UTC

- reply

I wrote " "book appropriates the horrors often lived by slaves or women of non-white ethnicities, as everything in it has happened, and makes it horrific to the general public by applying it to white women."
Yours : "Its about what has happened throughout history to women, set in an evangelical modern American setting.
Everything they do in the movie, has happened to women and minorities in our history
Its about what has happened throughout history to women, set in an evangelical modern American setting.
Everything they do in the movie, has happened to women and minorities in our history.
But it happens to rich people. So they feel it."

2024-12-01 14:18:21 UTC

- reply

and it's not "to poor people". It's to WOC. It's appropriation, it's not a wink to the struggle of the lower class. And can you give me an example of a dystopia drawing from "what happened to poor people Happening to whites ?" I love dystopian fiction but I can't recall any that draws from the plight of "poor people"

2024-12-01 14:10:37 UTC

- reply

yeah I read it again and you repeat exactly what I'm saying talking point after talking point

2024-12-01 14:09:33 UTC

- reply

it's also about the book actually, a Literature Master wouldn't be ok if you wrote only about a TV show ^^ and I specified twice I was talking about the book. The TV show has another set of problems. And my criticism stands. But I really don't understand your reply as you seem to be saying exactly what I said in my reply right before

2024-12-01 05:16:49 UTC

- reply

that was my Master's thesis for English literature
https://static.piaille.fr/media_attachments/files/113/575/823/071/284/484/original/d50bdc8b9acc8d6b.jpg

2024-12-01 05:00:35 UTC

- reply

I hate that it needed to happen to white women for people to truly see it as horrific and I hate that's why it worked on me when I first read it while at the same time not caring to read more about who it really happened to

2024-12-01 04:57:16 UTC

- reply

that's exactly what I said didn't I ?

2024-11-09 18:46:55 UTC

- reply

this book appropriates the horrors often lived by slaves or women of non-white ethnicities, as everything in it has happened, and makes it horrific to the general public by applying it to white women. There are no mention of any non-white character in it. It is white feminism at its finest. I agree it's a great book, very captivating to read. But it does reflect how a lot of people (of which I definitely was part at one point) only get truly horrified when things happen to white women.