DrZhivago

Public Key

npub1d53ea7aupxe4x3sdwy67q5fskcll3l3sksxpy434xv37gwqp2vrsctn2j8

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsx6gu7lw7qnv6ngcxhzd0q2yctv0lclcctgrqj2c6nxgly8qq4xpcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsdxv6wl

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1d53ea7aupxe4x3sdwy67q5fskcll3l3sksxpy434xv37gwqp2vrsctn2j8

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-09-21 03:18:14

- reply

What is your biggest hurdle to achieve the retard accessible upload option?

2024-09-20 04:46:45

- reply

Please don't touch my eyes.

2024-09-19 20:48:57

- reply

You and others should consider accepting Monero as well as Bitcoin to funding. If this has not already been done.

2024-09-17 17:20:23

- reply

Trump assassins so far with aggregated information.
1st, Thomas Crooks:
Deceased after shooting Trump.
Crooks had been identified as a person of interest at least an hour prior to shooting.
Local law enforcement engaged Crooks on the roof (~20 minutes prior?), Crooks allegedly pointed a rifle at LE, LE disengaged.
Members of public attending rally pointed out Crooks to Law Enforcement 3-5 minutes prior to shooting.
Secret service claimed the roof Crooks shot from was too sloped to have personnel stationed. The roof had a similar incline as the roof the counter-sniper team was setup on. The ones who killed Crooks.
The building Crooks shot from had law enforcement inside it.
The window behind the building Crooks shot from was staffed (it overlooks the roof) and staff was recalled/abandoned post shortly before shooting.
Crooks' phone was privately tracked by purchasing ad tracking information. Crooks' phone had travelled to Washington DC and spent time in locations known to be used by government, specifically FBI and Secret Service.
https://www.themainewire.com/2024/07/trump-shooter-mobile-tracking-data-shows-devices-traveling-to-washington-dc-massachusetts/
2nd, Ryan Routh:
Arrested after caught fleeing the location Secret Service fired upon. Location had a scoped rifle (ak variant), ceramic plates ("bullet-proof" vest), and a go-pro camera.
Routh worked as a recruiter for fighters in Ukraine, highlighted mainly through his social media posts. Routh helped secure visas for fighters from places like Pakistan and Afghanistan. This type of operation is known as "visas for terrorists", used to gain fighters via the US State Department through "subcontractors" like Routh. Supposedly he was able to secure 100s to 1000s of visas for fighters entering Ukraine to fight Russia.
Routh had many felonies on his record. CIA subcontractors can commit felonies if given proper government blessings.
Routh had information about when and where Trump was going to be that day of the attempted assassination.
Routh was originally from North Carolina (major military hub) but also spent time in Hawaii. Routh may have done some construction work in Hawaii, but it is unclear to what extent at this time.

2024-09-11 05:23:53

- reply

https://video.nostr.build/7e580f20167212cb4292fee127626ed05d45d88baff61d6830cf6acf7c6e9d45.mp4

2024-09-08 14:07:33

- reply

"Public opinion is Private's playground"

2024-09-05 13:56:27

- reply

You should put your Npub onto X somewhere. Didn't realize you had an account here. I have appreciated all your info!

2024-09-05 00:49:08

- reply

I think the largest difference is the ability to fractionally lend can be divorced from the ability to custody.
If you have BTC on-chain you can be certain it is in your custody. Whereas in a bank, the custodian can default and lose what you thought you had.
Fractional lending will certainly continue to exist, but blow-ups can be more localized instead of systemic. Lending will become opt-in.

2024-09-05 00:27:26

- reply

Since most of BTC on Lightning or eCash is custodial, do you think the same flaws of banks are an inevitability? Or have these protocols been able to overcome that temptation?
Monero has shown itself to be the superior non-custodial salable option imo

2024-09-03 19:51:19

- reply

The demand for XMR will not be televised.

2024-08-27 00:41:42

- reply

France is the patsy, USA is behind it

2024-08-25 21:21:44

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/0da79adb3c52ee7528aac453585614ac304443148428a32f81f71d8327dee957.jpg

2024-08-13 15:07:03

- reply

No KYC for a phone number. You can only receive calls and sms, cannot send. Registered for 1 year, with renewal option.

2024-08-06 01:55:14

- reply

On-chain or lightning?

2024-08-05 14:07:14

- reply

Deploy

2024-08-01 19:32:59

- reply

So what you're saying is: you're indirectly employed by the government. I see you FED.

2024-07-28 22:53:28

- reply

Thanks for the perspective.
Those who want privacy and sovereignty will take it. The rest will vote.

2024-07-25 17:12:43

- reply

I'm not your friend, guy. But I like your work!

2024-06-21 05:47:27

- reply

You should shill your own services to help others self-host. It's easy when you have help. Marketing is not evil!

2024-06-19 00:26:36

- reply

1921434

2024-04-28 06:33:13

It is pretty clear that laws are not being applied equally in the USA.
Selective enforcement is used to attack the perceived enemies of the State. This behavior is subject to change. Any group can become "out-group" if convenient for the Regime.
This behavior also displays weakness. Like a child lashing out at anyone who doesn't want to play their game. There's a real threat to asymptotic warfare. A minority of individuals (first-movers) who subvert the Regime have an outsized impact.
The comedic part is, it's literally a bunch of autistic basement trolls with greasy soles typing on the internet... Threatening "the most powerful nation in history".
Couldn't be a more beautiful match.
"I'm a revolutionary, I took my money back".

2024-04-25 05:53:10

- reply

Financial privacy = death of fiat currency
It is critical for Government to stop personal sovereignty over money.
It has also never been easier to be a revolutionary. Literally just go get your money from the bank. Crypto or Paper, a small % will topple the whole regime. That's the power of fractional reserve banking!

2024-02-21 07:17:53

When average people offload the burden of practicing privacy to the State, it becomes everyone's problem. The State has more resources than any individual and can act maliciously beyond the capacity of any ONE person. So the ignorance of privacy by the many results in the tyranny over all.
The State refutes privacy of the individual because it does not benefit the State. This is a deeply rooted Human issue that scales into physical violence, the likes of which we have not seen since the 1900s (eg: Hitler, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc...). With today's technology and general sentiment towards digital privacy, we are heading towards actions that will manifest in the physical world at a scale that dwarfs the 1900s.
Obedience is dangerous because people offload the responsibility of actions to captured agencies with compounded power. Individuals allow Hell to be brought forth (as in the 1900s). Those who are informed and who act against the intent of a malicious State are the bulwark against that Hell.
That is the context. Your actions may spare the destruction of millions.
David can beat Goliath. If David refuses to fight, then Goliath certainly wins. This is the strategy of the State vs Rebels.
Appear unbeatable. Crush morale. Suffocate the Spirit. Defeat the enemy before you have to fight... Because the State is ultimately more vulnerable than individuals. Fast moving small targets are harder to hit than slow moving beasts.
The State can destroy individuals, but if enough individuals have the courage to stand against it, the corrupt State collapses. It is always a minority that leads the majority, on both ends of the spectrum.
This is why the State makes terrible examples out of individuals who stand against it. (Snowden, Assange, Khashoggi...). It is terrified of empowered individuals.
If Humans were destined to be slaves to our Nature, we'd already be. We wouldn't even have these conversations. Like ants in a colony.
Our species is destined for greater heights. I refuse to believe otherwise, because I can lead my own life in that direction. I don't need everyone to be me. If I give up on that dream then I'm already dead.

2024-01-03 17:48:05

My thesis on UTXO size depends on Bitcoin's adoption. We are currently in an era of abundance for UTXOs. At some point in the not so distant future, they will become scarce. Leaving many people in trouble with economically unviable BTC dust. This will lead to centralization of holders on the base chain, with decentralized holders on a second layer or sidechain or what-have-you. Centralized holders will be able to make high fee bids, but it is also possible that they may not need to, as traffic is pushed off the base layer.
So for now fees are able to be nominally high in BTC and nominally high in USD. However as the demand increases and supply diminishes, I expect BTC fees to be nominally lower and USD value to be nominally higher. Very few people will ever custody .5+ BTC. Very few entities will be able to pay fees in the .5+ range. So fees will have to go one of two directions:
Centralized entities and/or federated groups compete for large amounts of blockspace with high amounts of BTC. (Whale wars)
Centralized entities and/or federated groups do not have to compete for blockspace with high amounts of BTC, because BTC becomes so concentrated in the hands of a few on the base layer, that blockspace actually becomes more abundant again. BTC continues to accrue value when measured against every other asset, but this also means less BTC is needed to represent high value. So fees may actually nominally reduce in the long-run, but the perceived value of those fees dramatically increases. (Concentrated Abundance)
Most of the world will never know what it means to custody .01 BTC personally. It is simply too scarce of an asset. There may only be 1.5 Billion UTXOs the size of .01 BTC (considering lost BTC). We are heading towards a population of 10 Billion. So most of the world will never transact on the base layer. This may not happen in our lifetimes, but it is inevitability going to play out this way. The adoption of BTC is what determines the pace of base-layer exclusivity. The more BTC is adopted, the faster people get priced out of the base layer.
I expect this to play out over the next 10 years, and by then we will know the direction we're headed. Either Whale Wars or Concentrated Abundance. If we go into Whale Wars, .5 BTC may not be a high enough UTXO. If we go into Concentrated Abundance, .5 BTC will be way too much for a UTXO. For now I think .01 or .05 is sufficient. You can always consolidate UTXOs if things start going crazy. Individuals such as you and I will have to cooperate in federations either way, which will combine UTXO sets. Individual transactions will become economically unviable in both versions of my future guesses.
It's hard for us to imagine a world of abundance because we have been living in scarcity for so long, and our current institutions/behavior reflect that. Our standard mode of operating is being challenged. Guessing future UTXO sizes is a guess on human behavior, and we are a fucking insane species.