August
VonHay

Be vigilant

Public Key

npub1chlpcxzfpyqwjsrhm75jmncnv7ex8vrxnfs3scmfd42l236gp9ns0k0mc3

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsvtlsurpysjq8fgpmal2fdeufk0vnrkpnf5cgcvd5k6404gayqjecpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsutfs48

Publishing to

offchain.pub

nos.lol

relay.damus.io

Author Public Key

npub1chlpcxzfpyqwjsrhm75jmncnv7ex8vrxnfs3scmfd42l236gp9ns0k0mc3

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-10-20 13:59:35 UTC

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐲𝐚𝐥: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐁𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐨𝐢𝐧’𝐬 𝐎G (Rich elites ) 𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐎𝐮𝐭
𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭
We all know the legend. The cypherpunk dream. A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,
designed to be sound money, free from the grasp of centralized banks and coercive
governments. It was meant to be decentralized, permissionless, and 【ｐｒｉｖａｔｅ．】
But somewhere along the line, the dream was corrupted. Not by outsiders, but from within. The very OGs who built their fortunes on Bitcoin’s early promise have become its most reactionary gatekeepers.
And their campaign against true privacy coins reveals their true motive: 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥
𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘭𝘭, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘩 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 !
The smoking gun? Their inexplicable, coordinated promotion of **Zcash** over fundamentally
superior and more Bitcoin-aligned privacy protocols like 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐧.
https://docs.grin.mw/wiki/introduction/grin-for-bitcoiners/
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗦𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗜𝗴𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗱
Let’s be clear about what Grin offers:
𝘼 𝙁𝙖𝙞𝙧 𝙇𝙖𝙪𝙣𝙘𝙝: No pre-mine, no founder’s reward, no early advantage for insiders. It
embodied the very ethos Bitcoiners claim to cherish.
𝐋𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞: Its Mimblewimble protocol is elegant, allowing for smaller
blockchains and faster verification. It fixes problems Bitcoin still struggles with.
𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙜, 𝘿𝙚𝙛𝙖𝙪𝙡𝙩 𝙋𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙖𝙘𝙮: Privacy isn't an option; it's woven into the fabric of every
transaction. It’s what Satoshi envisioned before the realities of a transparent ledger became
clear.
𝙽𝙾 𝙲𝚂𝙰𝙼, 𝙽𝚘 𝙹𝙿𝙴𝙶, 𝙽𝙾 𝚂𝙿𝙰𝙼
𝙉𝙤 𝘼𝙙𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙨, 𝙉𝙤 𝙖𝙢𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙫𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝙗𝙡𝙤𝙘𝙠𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙞𝙣 !
No metadata, previous data erased.
𝘿𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙯𝙚𝙙 𝙈𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜: It uses a mining algorithm (Cuckoo Cycle) promoting a more distributed mining base. You can run a FULL NODE with a old mobile phone.
Grin is the cypherpunk dream, fully realized. So why did the Bitcoin elite meet it with a collective yawn, or outright hostility?
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗭𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗵 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗿𝘂𝗺: 𝗔 𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗦𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱
Enter Zcash. A privacy coin with some significant, and very telling, compromises:
1. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 “𝙁𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧’𝙨 𝙍𝙚𝙬𝙖𝙧𝙙”: For its first four years, 20% of all block rewards went to the founders, investors, and developers. It was a massive, pre-programmed wealth transfer to insiders. 𝘼 𝘿𝙀𝙑 𝙏𝘼𝙓.
2. 𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙎𝙚𝙩𝙪𝙥: Its initial setup required a “ceremony” where participants had to trust that the private keys were destroyed. A critical point of failure and centralization that Bitcoin would never tolerate. Even it is removed, **optional privacy** stayed.
3. 𝙻𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚂𝚞𝚙𝚙𝚕𝚢: Crucially, Zcash mimics Bitcoin’s hard cap of 21 million coins.
And here we find the heart of the conspiracy. The OGs don’t champion Zcash because it’s technically superior; they champion it because its economic model 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗘𝗗𝗬 𝗕𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗢𝗚
Greedy sneaky mind of an early Bitcoin adopter sitting on a fortune:
𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙂𝙤𝙖𝙡: Preserve the purchasing power of their BTC stack. Not to create the best monetary system, but to ensure their early adoption pays off maximally.
𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 #𝟏 (𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭): they know their wealth, sitting on a public ledger, is at risk from future wealth confiscation, punitive taxes, or regulation. They *desperately* need privacy.
𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 #𝟐 (𝐃𝐢𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧):
𝙰 𝚗𝚎𝚠, 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚍, 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚎, and *predictable issuance* coin like 𝗚𝗿𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁.
Its fair launch means they have no head start.
Its tail emission model (a small, continuous inflation) prevents it from becoming a purely deflationary asset that would simply replicate and challenge Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative.
𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙈𝙤𝙫𝙚: They need a privacy solution that neutralizes Threat #1 without activating Threat #2.
𝙕𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙝 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙮: It provides the **optional** privacy they need to shield their own wealth from governments, while its hard-capped supply ensures it can never challenge Bitcoin’s core value proposition as a deflationary store of value.
By shilling Zcash, they * think they get the privacy tool they need without sponsoring a competitor that could actually dethrone their king.
( 𝘼 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙥𝙩 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙆𝙔𝘾 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙖𝙘𝙮)
𝙂𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙮 𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝘽𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙧s are in 𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗰
This is the ultimate hypocrisy. The OGs lecture the community on "sound money" and "decentralization" while backing a project with a founder's reward and a trusted setup. They attack Grin's tail emission as "inflationary" while ignoring that its fair launch is more morally and economically sound than Zcash's insider-friendly & dev tax model.
𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘺𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘶𝘯𝘬 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘭𝘭.
𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘳𝘺𝘱𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘺.
They aren't building a future of free, private, decentralized money. They are building a gated community with their Bitcoin wealth at the center, using projects like Zcash as a privacy fence to keep the authorities out, and shunning projects like Grin to keep any real competitors down.
The message is clear: *𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁𝘀.*
The great betrayal is complete.
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘰𝘪𝘯 𝘖𝘎𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯; 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘩𝘺 𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘧.
𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘺 very soon.
As the satoshi says; Bitcoiners kicked the hornest nest with Zcash privacy panic shilling, and swarm headed towards to us.
Just take your seat at fronts and GRIN ツ to them.

2025-10-08 17:40:38 UTC

- reply

KNOTS is not cure. With op return door are open for final nail on the coffin of bitcoin.
#nevent1q…e4sh

2025-10-08 17:34:02 UTC

- reply

ring sigantures has no rpivacy when usa controls all tor exit nodes and run monero nodes.
What will you get ffrom tx graph?
THere is NO Adresses, NO AMounts stored on blokchcain.
ALL METADATA Past tx ERASED.
MONERO keeps ALL Data and it is all on the floor with AI computing.
Be my guest if you trust monero coin mixing vs state computing power.

2025-08-28 09:03:00 UTC

- reply

For organic grow,
Grincoin a real fair distribution
More decentralization and scalablity
Much more secure with simple design
Bypass KYC and other govt tracing and tainting and confiscating your wealth thanks to erasing metadata with privacy features.
You can run node on a redmi5 old mobile phone.

2025-08-26 17:50:03 UTC

- reply

Dont condradict with yourself. Bitcoin has a capped supply and already coopted.
https://blossom.primal.net/46e11d10c9248cf68ad2ef75bdd48a5106b80b74083f331b3a57ed186308f563.png

2025-08-26 15:38:22 UTC

- reply

Grin MimbleWİmble design is more simple and decentralized than Monero as a whole blockchain.
If a blockchain can't scale, can it achieve enough privacy ?
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoTechnology/comments/kyhgcv/are_there_any_public_cryptocurrencyblockchain/

2025-08-26 15:05:38 UTC

- reply

it erases all metadata. Interactive transactions only way for cash alike TX
your claims are just bat shit.

2025-08-26 13:08:47 UTC

- reply

wait until capped supply hoarded by VC wall street banksters and governments and taint the addresses like a bank account.
Go ahead, Ai is not your friend.

2025-08-26 09:53:44 UTC

- reply

In the name of decentralization,privacy and freedom...
https://grin.mw/

2025-08-25 20:57:37 UTC

- reply

Teach them Grin mimblewimble privacy and monetary policy instead of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is now belongs to Banks and Wall street funds.
KYC'Ed

2025-08-25 20:55:54 UTC

- reply

So when dragons breath fire, you say its just a FUD ?
So naive.

2025-08-25 20:54:12 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin Capped supply is its cataclysm when state actors vacuum it with KYC

2025-08-25 18:43:38 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin is the experiment.
Could NOT pass KYC test.

2025-08-25 17:22:47 UTC

Not everyone wants to deal with the technicalities of their own car, and not everyone wants to handle the technicalities of their own money??
Yeah a person wants to hold his own car key and his own money !!!
Bitcoiners get corrupted when they are offered a job by VC firms.
Go and kid shitcoiners you imposter.

2025-08-25 17:19:25 UTC

Monero looks like blackberry nokia now.. Ai kills such Old tech blockchains.

2025-01-29 21:11:11 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin transactions will be censored, self hosted wallets will be freezed by banks dive in crypto custody.
Inevitable mining centralization with halving, a ticking time bomb set by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Remember: Satoshi 2010 - I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.
#nevent1q…mt3h

2025-01-29 12:47:22 UTC

Bitcoiners now so accurate.
https://m.primal.net/OFwo.png

2025-01-29 10:29:16 UTC

In this Ai led future, Bitcoin is far from being the decentralized payment system envisioned.
Its use cases for everyday people will vanish, transformed into an instrument solely for the large centralized powers and used mainly as settlement between large regulated institutions and controlled hedge funds.
https://m.primal.net/OFpl.webp

2025-01-29 10:08:19 UTC

While Bitcoin is the dominant player today, Grincoin has the potential to be much more important for a true P2P ecosystem.

2025-01-16 10:16:21 UTC

Grin, a decentralized cryptocurrency, is a community-driven open source, resilient project which envisions a safe, anti-censorship, private P2P future where decision-making power belongs to no one central entity and, it only requires active open collaboration by diverse groups, for growth, validation and maintenance using innovative technologies within such operational frameworks for the future, that ‘it empowers by this design choice as a guiding principal .

2025-01-12 10:33:31 UTC

Morto 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙞𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙨: Bitcoin was originally designed to function as "peer-to-peer electronic cash," but this concept has crumbled into a private banking network that serves only substantial capital transactions. Ultimately, it has reduced itself to a mere sterile record-keeping system.
𝘽𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙧𝙚𝙜𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝘽𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙤𝙞𝙣
By controlling a significant portion of on-chain transactions and having direct relationships with regulated centralized systems, institutions gain substantial sway over the core consensus mechanism of the Bitcoin network. This dynamic introduces a new form of censorship, especially if their private connections refuse to process transactions from users whom the state has classified as unwelcome.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗕𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻:
Rather than focusing on individual peer-to-peer transactions, the Bitcoin network primarily facilitates substantial transfers between banks for settlement purposes, significant asset movements orchestrated by central banks, and ongoing rebalancing activities conducted by major institutions such as BlackRock.

2025-01-11 08:52:17 UTC

The system of private property is the most important guarantee of freedom, not only for those who own property, but scarcely less for those who do not.