H3RALD

Just a tinkerer pursuing more minimalist and bloat-free computing. I enjoying crafting and using my own tools, typically using Nim and C, sometimes in JavaScript and of course my very own programming languages (min in particular, and some of its derivatives).

Web Site: https://h3rald.com
Code: https://code.h3rald.com
Bookmarks: https://2c.fyi
Tools: https://nifty.tools

Last Notes

2026-06-01 20:39:07 UTC

- reply

Kelvin versioning is actually a fantastic idea. It should be more common for certain things for sure, like programming languages, compilers, assemblers and infrastructure in general.
With a bit of luck, with the way things are going in the world, it may as well end up being the preferred versioning system for artisan/human-made software.
Day after day, I find myself longing for software that reaches maturity and stability above all else.

2026-05-28 15:56:00 UTC

- reply

i would personally love a physical copy. I loved the other book and it was nice reading it on paper not on a device! Can't wait till they become available!

2026-05-20 20:18:05 UTC

- reply

Ahh nice! Read the odyssey first obviously 😊 -- i think I must have read most of the (translated) odyssey in high school, by far my favorite epic work. And only bits of Ulysses unfortunately... my father-in-law is Irish and used to be an expert on the subject back in his day though 🤪

2026-04-07 19:38:36 UTC

- reply

I had a look, and I think it mostly makes sense. Certain things sound slightly off (e.g. I would have used "inserere" as infinitive for "insere"), and the things that throws me the most is that... I don't know if genders (which are kinda still present) are supposed to match or not. Reading about LSF I guess not, but I would write "lingua de programmatione concatenativA", for example. Also "decimal" should probably be "decimale"?
You are matching "porta logica" which sounds right to me, but I am trying to find an authoritative text explaining the rules of LSF... they should be very clear, in theory. So far I found this which should be the original article describing it, but verbs especially seems conjugated "enough" (definitely more than English, for example): https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/35803/pg35803-images.html

2026-04-07 05:49:21 UTC

- reply

As an Italian, this sounds pretty natural to me! 😊 I wasn't familiar with Latino Sine Flexione (or probably forgot) and I gotta say it is fascinating. It is amazing how removing inflections and conjugation makes Latin much simpler to understand. After all, Italian did a bit of this by removing *some* inflections in favor of adding more prepositions, but this is much easier than, say, reading the original Dante.
Reading it also reminds me of medieval "ecclesiastical Latin", which was notoriously simpler for people to understand.
And yes, I loved the "sacco" choice. It is still very much used in Italian (as "sack" typically, but also as an emphatic way to mean "a lot of" something). Much simpler (and fun!) than multiset. I could actually say I understood more about Rejoice by reading this than the original doc 😜 please do keep this up!

2026-03-22 16:07:16 UTC

- reply

happy birthday! Welcome to the club, I am just 2 year ahead myself. Well, nearly 3 I guess. And yes, the pressure to keep fit does feel real at this point 😁

2025-12-05 19:59:29 UTC

- reply

I just want to say that what you can accomplish in such a short time is beyond impressive. It kinda breaks my brain: on one side, there's you, on the other side, there's a team of experienced software developers at work that quoted me 230 story points (roughly 230 working days) to build a relatively straightforward dashboard editor in JavaScript.
I mean, if I go to my teams and say something like "I know someone that can build a whole programming language using *their own* language/ecosystem within 2Kb for TWO story points..." I think most people would just quit.

2025-08-12 15:46:07 UTC

- reply

the problem with forks is that... well, they kinda "dilute" the success or supporters of a particular project. So the obvious question would be: would some of these improvement make sense to be merged upstream? Problem is some (all?) of these would break compatibility for existing Uxn programs, but I'd say creating migrations scripts would be easy enough.

2025-08-12 15:16:45 UTC

- reply

yep... read about it when it was featured on HN a while back. I skimmed through the differences with Uxn and some of them are interesting. I am wondering what @npub1z8r…mrq6 thinks about this...

2025-05-16 04:51:22 UTC

- reply

I have been reading into permacomputing for a while, and while I agree that we should strive to produce software that uses less resources, is maintainable, portable, etc. (and Uxn is probably one of the best examples out there, as checks all these boxes), I am not 100% sure of the premise of projects like CollapseOS and DuskOS.
These projects make HN regularly, and obviously they get hit with the typical HN responses... the main points seem to be:
- in case of a total collapse of civilization, owning a paper copy of The Book (https://howtorebuildcivilization.com) would be 1000 times more valuable than fiddling with computers or similar
- in case of a gradual collapse, humanity would adapt in a smoother way
- particular types of shortages (lack of Internet, lack of certain materials) would require different types of solutions, not the same one
For me, it makes a lot more sense to focus on recycling existing hardware for the sake of reducing waste, for more practical emergencies (lost phones, lack of financial means, etc.) rather than "civilization collapse". But at that point, it would be more practical to make sure you can rely on software that runs on a 2010s android or iPhone device, maybe even a old BlackBerry device, than learning how to program in forth on an older chip. Where do you draw the line? What is the hardware we should realistically be targeting, with permacomputing?
I would really like to hear your thoughts on this.

2025-04-30 04:25:47 UTC

- reply

That's fantastic! Really can't wait to see what it will be like. Well, I can imagine how awesome it is going to be based on your existing work... please do keep us all posted!

2025-04-29 19:55:24 UTC

- reply

I did try learning uxn a year ago (or maybe two??) while on holiday for two weeks. So I read pretty much all the material on your site, kept the cute zzine at hand, and also got myself the tutorial ebook. I was able to follow the tutorial up to like Day 3 or 4, then got lost a little bit.
I guess my main problem was that I was trying to learn it essentially on my phone, not on a desktop PC, so until things stayed in the CLI I was able to follow everything while SSHing to my VPS; but once things got graphical (and more complex) I wasn't able to try things right away.
In my mind, I would really love for Uxn to become similar to... _why's Shoes for Ruby. He published a funky little book with loads of graphics and that was literally ENOUGH to learn everything and start coding. I would like to be able to see the code, fully commented, but also with a preview (even drawings!) of the result, and possibly in some cases even stack contents. Granted, Shoes and Ruby are MUCH higher level than Uxn and Uxntal...
For me, the killer docs for Uxn would be an expansion to the Zine, a fully graphical book that can *also* act as full reference and comprehensive tutorial. All in one place.
Hell if you and @npub1z2c…laft and others started a Kickstarter or similar for that, I'd definitely contribute!

2025-02-04 06:15:29 UTC

- reply

...just like that! Wow. Yet another fun rabbit hole to explore! Nice! :flan_cool:

2025-01-25 19:58:08 UTC

- reply

Unbelievable. So sad that it happened, everyone should just boycott the damn thing. Pity.

2024-12-22 18:29:25 UTC

- reply

crazy... it has been like +14°C here during the day yesterday 😜

2024-12-22 18:25:50 UTC

- reply

wow! Where are you guys? Canada?

2024-12-21 16:52:51 UTC

- reply

they do, don't they? And it's kind of addictive.