lkraider

She is not divine, but she is not merely a “sister.” She is the Theotokos, because the one she bore is one Person, fully God and fully man.
The one born of her is not another person alongside God. He is the eternal Son of God Himself, who became man. That is why the Church calls her the Ark of the New Covenant.

2026-03-19 11:56:13 UTC

- reply

Extorção Judicial

2026-03-19 10:51:03 UTC

- reply

Yeah, give in to the Spirit of Revolution, deny reality in favor of dreams, see where it leads you. There is a reason this was abandoned circa 300 AD, there are no fruits for these thoughts, they are a delusion. Heresy means “choice”, it is the opposite of humility. We are learning the extent our choices to depart from reality are leading us.

2026-03-19 10:45:41 UTC

- reply

This guy is just rehashing his own version of Gnosticism. Basic heretic.

2026-03-19 01:29:43 UTC

- reply

700 M men will die

2026-03-18 08:54:00 UTC

- reply

Foi um pouco de sarcasmo: ali é mais verdadeiro pois só tem um candidato mesmo, logo a ilusão da escolha nem existe.

2026-03-18 01:58:37 UTC

- reply

Questioned my AI agent about it:
---
A “security” is not merely a legal label; it is a particular kind of relation of claim and expectation structured in time. To answer ontologically, we have to ask: what kind of thing is a security, and what properties make it what it is?
⸻
1) Ontological category
A security is not a substance (like a physical object), nor a mere idea. It is best understood as a:
Relational, institutional, teleological object
• Relational: it exists between parties (issuer ↔ holder).
• Institutional: it depends on a recognized framework of authority (law, enforcement, accounting).
• Teleological: it is oriented toward an end - namely, profit derived from an external source.
So ontologically, a security is a formalized claim on future value mediated by others.
⸻
2) Core metaphysical properties
A thing is a “security” when it participates in the following essential properties:
a) Derivative dependence
Its value is not intrinsic, but derived from:
• the performance of an enterprise, or
• the actions of identifiable others.
It is ontologically parasitic on another activity.
⸻
b) Expectation of profit (teleology)
It encodes a future-directed orientation:
• the holder possesses it because of an anticipated gain.
This is not incidental; it is part of its formal cause.
⸻
c) Delegated agency
The realization of that gain depends on:
• managerial effort,
• entrepreneurial action,
• or organized coordination external to the holder.
The holder is not the primary efficient cause.
⸻
d) Abstract claim structure
It represents:
• a right, entitlement, or slice of flows (cash, governance, residual value).
This is a formal relation, not a material object.
⸻
e) Institutional grounding
Its existence depends on:
• enforceable rules,
• recognized authority,
• shared symbolic systems (contracts, ledgers, registries).
Without this, it collapses into mere intention.
⸻
3) Form vs matter
Using classical metaphysics:
• Matter: the substrate (paper certificate, database entry, token)
• Form: the structured relation of claim on future value via others
A security is defined by its form, not its substrate.
A blockchain token can be a security if it instantiates that form.
A paper document may not be a security if it lacks that structure.
⸻
4) Boundary with “non-securities”
Now contrast with what the SEC chair listed:
• Digital commodities → have intrinsic or use-based value (they are closer to substances or tools)
• Digital collectibles → derive value from rarity or symbolic meaning, not delegated enterprise
• Digital tools → their value is immediate utility, not future profit from others
• Payment stablecoins → aim at value stability, not profit expectation
These lack one or more of the essential properties above, especially:
• teleology toward profit
• dependence on others’ managerial action
⸻
5) Higher metaphysical framing
A security belongs to the category of:
“Participatory claims in ordered economic action”
It is a formal participation in another’s productive hierarchy.
In more classical terms:
• It is a mediated participation in another’s energy (energeia).
• The holder does not act, but partakes in the fruit of action.
⸻
6) Strong opposing view (expert critique)
An opposing ontological view would argue:
• A security is not metaphysically distinct at all.
• It is simply a legal classification imposed by regulators.
• All the properties above (profit expectation, dependency, etc.) are:
• contingent,
• culturally defined,
• historically variable.
Under this view:
“Security” is not a real ontological category, but a regulatory heuristic over financial contracts.
⸻
7) Hidden risks in the metaphysical framing
• You may be reifying a legal abstraction into a “real form” that does not exist independently.
• The “expectation of profit” is psychologically subjective and hard to ground ontologically.
• Many instruments blur boundaries:
• commodities with yield (staking),
• collectibles with speculation,
• tools that produce income.
The category is fuzzy at the edges, which suggests weak ontological rigidity.
⸻
8) Reframing as a decision problem
Instead of “what is a security?”, the practical frame is:
• Option A: Treat it as a real metaphysical category
• Option B: Treat it as a legal classification over economic patterns
• Option C: Treat it as a spectrum of participation in others’ productive action
• Option D: Do nothing (accept ambiguity and operate case-by-case)
⸻
9) Best working definition
A precise synthesis:
A security is a formalized, institutionally grounded claim that grants participation in future value generated primarily by the organized activity of others, and is held with the teleological orientation of profit.
⸻
10) Immediate critique of that definition
• It fails in edge cases like:
• zero-dividend stocks held for control
• assets bought purely for hedging
• It assumes “profit” is essential, which may not always hold.
• It overweights metaphysical structure vs. legal enforcement.
⸻
11) Reduction to testable criteria (practical layer)
To operationalize:
Ask:
1. Does this represent a claim on someone else’s productive activity?
2. Is the holder relying on others to create value?
3. Is it held because of expected gain?
4. Does it require an institutional framework to exist?
If most answers are “yes”, it approximates a security.
⸻
12) Small-step grounding (avoid abstraction drift)
Instead of large metaphysical claims:
• Take 3 instruments (stock, bitcoin, NFT)
• Map them explicitly across the 4 criteria above
• Define kill-criteria:
• if classification flips under minor interpretation → category is unstable
This prevents building a theory detached from reality.
⸻
13) Final note
At its deepest level, a security is not just “financial”. It reflects a broader metaphysical pattern:
participation without direct action -
a mediated sharing in the fruit of another’s work.
That pattern exists beyond finance, but in securities it is formalized, quantified, and tradable.

2026-03-18 01:04:22 UTC

- reply

Quando você descobrir que toda democracia é falsa, vai ver que ali é mais verdadeiro que muito país ocidental.

2026-03-17 16:34:35 UTC

- reply

Surpresa para ninguém. É como chegar e explodir o Palacio do Planalto e achar que o país vai cair.

2026-03-12 18:10:02 UTC

- reply

O celular morre? Kkk

2026-03-09 16:58:14 UTC

- reply

Yey propaganda. Can you serve it with more bbq sauce? Or maybe little children blood on top.

2026-02-11 21:51:19 UTC

- reply

I did, the unsupervised code is only production ready if you don’t care about your product.

2025-10-06 00:34:30 UTC

- reply

“Revokucionarios do bem”

2025-09-24 23:20:36 UTC

- reply

É um festival de gordas empoderadas

2025-09-18 23:01:13 UTC

https://youtube.com/shorts/cDRk9NuwJEo
@npub1vg9…8885

2025-09-06 18:55:57 UTC

- reply

I mean, you can deconstruct anything at an arbitrary level. Eg: Planets? They are basically a rounding error in terms of matter if you look at the galactic scale. Helpful information for you to base your life decisions? Not really.

2025-08-23 18:50:52 UTC

- reply

How can relays opt to be included in that list?
What about a DHT for updating the list instead of app updates?

2025-08-14 01:18:25 UTC

- reply

Demon room.
When you have to rationalize the obvious, you know they are playing everyone for a fool.

2025-08-10 21:22:52 UTC

- reply

You may not think it is but don’t be alarmed when they come for you because your carbon emission is above the threshold. We are quick do dehumanize those that don’t contribute to our welfare.

2025-08-03 00:16:28 UTC

- reply

Querem matar todo mundo.

2025-07-10 00:39:04 UTC

- reply

You think it’s a coincidence? Look up hos friends and background, he‘s being sponsored into publicity.

2025-07-06 22:17:27 UTC

- reply

How do you prepare green bananas?

2024-10-09 01:46:23 UTC

- reply

Relatório deles mesmo, não é segredo:
https://www.blackrock.com/us/individual/literature/whitepaper/bitcoin-a-unique-diversifier.pdf

2024-10-07 13:42:20 UTC

- reply

USER: Can you make a python library for this?
AGENT: Certainly! Below is a simple Python library that implements the Cornish numeral system. This library provides functions to convert numbers to Cornish numerals and vice versa.
### Cornish Numerals Library
```python
# cornish_numerals.py
class CornishNumerals:
# Basic numerals and their Cornish representations
basic_numerals = {
1: "un",
2: "dew",
3: "tri",
4: "peswar",
5: "pymthek",
6: "hwegh",
7: "seyth",
8: "ew",
9: "nav",
10: "deg",
20: "ugens",
30: "trigain",
40: "peswarugens",
50: "pymtheg",
60: "hwegh",
100: "kan"
}
@classmethod
def to_cornish(cls, number):
if number <= 10:
return cls.basic_numerals.get(number, None)
elif number < 20:
return f"{cls.basic_numerals[10]} ha {cls.basic_numerals[number - 10]}"
elif number >= 20:
m = number // 20
n = number % 20
parts = []
if m > 0:
parts.append(cls.basic_numerals[20 * m])
if n > 0:
if n <= 10:
parts.append(cls.basic_numerals[n])
else:
parts.append(f"{cls.basic_numerals[10]} ha {cls.basic_numerals[n - 10]}")
return " ha ".join(parts)
return None
@classmethod
def from_cornish(cls, cornish_numeral):
# Handle basic numerals
for key, value in cls.basic_numerals.items():
if cornish_numeral == value:
return key
# Handle compound numerals
parts = cornish_numeral.split(" ha ")
total = 0
for part in parts:
if part in cls.basic_numerals.values():
total += list(cls.basic_numerals.keys())[list(cls.basic_numerals.values()).index(part)]
else:
for key, value in cls.basic_numerals.items():
if part == value:
total += key
break
return total
# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Convert number to Cornish numeral
for i in range(1, 30):
print(f"{i} in Cornish: {CornishNumerals.to_cornish(i)}")
# Convert Cornish numeral back to number
example_numeral = "ugens ha tri"
print(f"{example_numeral} is {CornishNumerals.from_cornish(example_numeral)} in numeric form.")
```
### Explanation
1. **Class Definition**: The `CornishNumerals` class contains methods to convert numbers and Cornish numerals.
2. **Basic Numerals**: A dictionary maps integers to their Cornish representations.
3. **Conversion Methods**:
- `to_cornish(number)`: Converts a numeric integer to its Cornish numeral representation.
- `from_cornish(cornish_numeral)`: Converts a Cornish numeral back to its numeric form.
4. **Example Usage**: The script includes an example that demonstrates the conversion both ways.
### How to Use
1. Save the code in a file named `cornish_numerals.py`.
2. Run the script, or import the `CornishNumerals` class in another Python script to use its methods.
This library can be expanded with more features, such as handling larger numbers or improving error handling as needed.

2024-10-05 13:02:12 UTC

- reply

The issue is to assume that through that “study” - and that’s a can of worms on its own - it necessarily follows that systematizing the lived experience into some information system will render any greater insight. For example, it is clear that explaining all about a sport like basketball doesn’t make the person that doesn’t practice that sport into a good basketball player. Learning, as a form of encyclopedic knowledge, is not a complete knowledge. The same reason as simply reading about religion is not the same as practicing a religion. The Truth is not encoded into systems of knowledge, but in lived experience, and trying to convey it through systematization is always a lower resolution version of that.

2024-09-27 02:16:10 UTC

- reply

Depends what your device can handle. Think of it like this: the full model might be 4Gb, if your device has 8Gb it might fit in memory, so 100% of the layers can be loaded there (and still have some room for the system and apps and such). But if your device has only 6Gb or 4Gb, the whole model will not fit, so you will need to test if 50% can be loaded into memory, or maybe less. At some point it might not make sense to use the GPU if only too little layers are loaded there, since the overhead of combining CPU + GPU work can predominate. Also, you need free memory space for the context window, so bigger contexts will consume more space and leave less space for layers, while smaller context leaves space for more layers.

2023-03-23 15:57:03 UTC

TechnoCalyps (2006) - documentario examinando o transhumanismo:
https://youtu.be/2NQeK5oft1s