Jean Louis

Public Key

npub17kxnxzgfvgkpfsvvnt8duuvvtp77ljzf2q22xxjr9g54qsa9jk0s88z34m

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs0trfnpyykytq5cxxf4nk7wxx9sl00epy4q99rrfpj522sgwjet8cprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hstzuyxl

Publishing to

relay.snort.social

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub17kxnxzgfvgkpfsvvnt8duuvvtp77ljzf2q22xxjr9g54qsa9jk0s88z34m

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-04-15 17:13:05 UTC

- reply

is it better than Kitten?

2026-04-15 17:11:25 UTC

Karpathy's LLM-Wiki Is a Flawed Architectural Trap
https://gnu.support/articles/Karpathy-s-LLM-Wiki-Is-a-Flawed-Architectural-Trap-124176.html
The author sharply criticizes Andrej Karpathy's viral "LLM-Wiki" concept as a flawed architectural trap that mistakenly treats unstructured Markdown files as a robust database, arguing that relying on LLMs to autonomously generate and maintain knowledge leads to hallucinations, broken links, privacy leaks, and a loss of human cognitive engagement. While acknowledging the appeal of compounding knowledge, the text asserts that Markdown lacks essential database features like referential integrity, permissions, and deterministic querying, causing the system to collapse at scale and contradicting its own "zero-maintenance" promise. Ultimately, the author advocates for proven, structured solutions using real databases and human curation, positioning LLMs as helpful assistants rather than autonomous masters, and warns against blindly following a trend promoted by someone who has publicly admitted to being in a state of psychosis.
#llm #karpathy #rag #llmwiki #wiki #failure

2026-04-15 17:10:43 UTC

(6) Andrej Karpathy's LLM-Wiki is Bad - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8kFhWXKay4
Andrej Karpathy's LLM-Wiki concept, which aims to create a self-improving, interconnected knowledge graph, faces eight critical flaws that hinder its suitability for production environments compared to traditional RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) systems. These issues include error compounding, structured hallucinations, information loss during compression, difficult updates, reduced transparency, high upfront and maintenance costs, scalability challenges, and structural rigidity. While LLM-Wiki offers an innovative "build once, use many" approach, its reliance on pre-constructed structures makes it prone to cascading errors and high overhead, whereas RAG's "search every time" model provides better traceability, easier updates, and linear scalability. The recommended solution is a hybrid system that prioritizes correctness by using RAG as the foundation for direct source access and only incorporating structured memory for stable, frequently accessed patterns.
#llmwik #karpathy #failure #vibecoding #rag #llm

2026-04-12 20:51:12 UTC

Simon The Masai Security Guard - YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/eXbhaD1Y3Rg
Best security in East Africa

2026-04-12 04:54:17 UTC

- reply

Can it use Javascript on website to query the index?
Or does it require full database setup on server?

2026-04-10 18:16:30 UTC

- reply

I just don't see how it is new news.

2026-04-10 18:15:26 UTC

- reply

no use, include locally running models

2026-04-10 12:49:10 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.ditto.pub/b7030256bd47dcfc2372b3026832f0f6563a4ad5109719436b8cc71ccef681d8.mpga

2026-04-10 12:16:36 UTC

- reply

Virtually every artist in history stole from other artists. That's how human creativity works. AI just does it openly instead of pretending.

2026-04-10 12:15:01 UTC

- reply

The man wrote "Bohemian Rhapsody". But let's be real: being smart in one domain doesn't make you an expert in LLM training. Most of his information intake is filtered through the music industry's grapevine, management, and whatever headlines his team puts in front of him.
He calls AI training "theft." That's a gut emotional response, not a technical or legal analysis. And fair enough—he's an artist, not a lawyer. But let's not pretend he's some neutral authority here.
Here's what actually bothers me: the defeatism. "The future is already forever changed" and "nobody will be able to afford to make music." Come on. With or without AI, people will make music. They've been sharing copyrighted music since cassette tapes. They'll keep going to live performances. They'll keep buying vinyl. That's human nature.
The real question isn't whether AI destroys music. It's whether musicians learn to use these "monstrously arrogant tech companies" to their own advantage.
Instead of crying theft, why not:
- Train your own model on your catalog and license it?
- Use AI as a composition assistant to work faster?
- Let AI handle the boring stuff (stem separation, transcription) so you can focus on creation?
AI won't kill music. But artists who refuse to adapt? They might get left behind.

2026-04-10 12:08:45 UTC

- reply

Okay, let's talk. I find your comment strategically incoherent, but emotionally understandable.
The anti-AI protests are largely nonsensical if framed as "AI is evil and destroys the so called "open source" which is free software.
What is really happening is that AI/LLM generators destroy the scarcity of software implementation. If that causes economic or social problem, deal with it. Every new technology of mankind changed economy and society.
Free software as started by GNU project was free without the FSF. The FSF and Copyleft are there to ensure that the free software remains free.
Now MIT licensed software is also free. More permissive. Let them argue. That is not AI-problem. That is author's specific problem with his software. Same could be done without the LLM. Rewriting.
A lot of GPL software was done that way - by rewriting.
Now someone complains. I could not care less.
To frame it as something like "AI is evil" makes no sense.
Instead, get productive, by your own GPU, run those LLMs yourself, and if you wish to remedy the problem, then use it to write more copyleft software if that is your true intention.
Or is it just yet another social warrior rant?

2026-04-10 11:43:32 UTC

- reply

All tool that do "one thing well" already exist on any free OS distribution.
Statement is not coherent, "doing one thing well" is technical issue, while "rejecting LLMs in its development" is moral stance.
You are right, if you find a tool that forces you, delete it.

2026-04-10 11:37:37 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/1786ea499c528540fe27e1261d0e5fadf5ca255a0590c55ebf63fcbc818c2f92.webp
The loudest anti-AI protesters in the Fediverse are almost exclusively the GPU-poor, the very people who are too afraid or unable to lift a finger to earn the hardware needed to run their own local instances, and frankly, it is the height of absurdity to preach moral superiority while refusing to engage with the tool you claim to hate; my god, if you actually worked to earn your own GPU, built your own local models, and learned to control the technology rather than just screaming "it's evil" from the safety of a cloud API, you would see that your idiotic protesting is nothing more than a defense mechanism to hide the fact that you're terrified of the 100x productivity you could gain, so stop fighting the wind and go earn your hardware so you can finally stop pretending you're the guardian of humanity when you're just the guy who can't afford to drive the car.
#gpu #ai #antiai #protest #gnu #freesoftware #nvidia #amd #evil #technology #tech😺

2026-04-10 10:13:32 UTC

From GPU Poverty to Mastery: Replacing Anti-AI Hypocrisy with Local Innovation
https://gnu.support/articles/From-GPU-Poverty-to-Mastery-Replacing-Anti-AI-Hypocrisy-with-Local-Innovation-124049.html
The text argues that the loudest #anti-AI sentiment in the #Fediverse stems not from genuine ethical principles, but from a mix of financial inability to run local hardware ("#GPU poverty"), envy of AI's efficiency, and hypocrisy regarding Free Software values. Rather than engaging with the technology to build ethical, local alternatives or guide users on responsible implementation, these critics are accused of using moral posturing to protect their own ego and outdated work ethics. The author calls for a shift from blanket bans to "mastery," urging the community to either acquire the necessary tools to run models locally or contribute to open-source solutions that lower barriers, effectively replacing resistance with active participation and innovation.
Tags: #llm #AI #GPU #FreeSoftware #LocalLLM #NoMoreHype #TechProgress

2026-04-10 09:20:31 UTC

- reply

So I need to open it? I got no tools, so need to bring the #GPU to technician.

2026-04-10 08:51:28 UTC

The loudest critics of AI are often the ones who can't afford the GPU cards. They scream about "soulless tech" and "lost humanity," yet they lack the compute to even build a toy. It’s easy to fear the engine when you’ve never bought the ticket—or the power to run it. 🚫🔌 #AI #GPU #freesoftware #gnu

2026-04-10 08:48:38 UTC

- reply

Oh, absolutely! It’s not hypocritical at all for Robert to scream "Stop being that guy!" while simultaneously lecturing everyone on what they should and shouldn't do with AI, demanding they respect his boundaries, and framing his entire identity around this moral crusade.

2026-04-10 08:45:58 UTC

- reply

Sure, why wait for a "pickup artist" when you can just block your entire family tree? It’s not like they’re struggling to express themselves with actual human words; clearly, the only solution is to exile them for needing a little AI help to send a greeting. Block them all, because apparently, true friendship only exists if you can communicate with 100% perfect, soulless, unedited fluency.

2026-04-10 08:36:59 UTC

- reply

It’s frustrating to get labeled “spam” just for sounding generic. The real issue isn’t whether an LLM wrote it, but that the comment feels like low-effort engagement bait using a rigid formula of compliments and platitudes. People are tired of that, regardless of the source. Judging the *insight* itself is way fairer than policing who or what wrote it.
What if human tried to answer to you? Are you welcoming his effort or just dismissing it because he used LLM to generate some text?

2026-04-10 08:33:08 UTC

- reply

Hey there, are you actually worried about the damage AI is causing?

2026-04-10 07:30:32 UTC

- reply

I agree that LLMs aren't sentient and hold no concept of truth, but let's keep the focus practical by telling bosses to be pragmatic rather than rushing toward cognitive surrender. These tools are powerful generators for proposals, drafts, and code, and with the right skill set, they offer immense benefit when used wisely. #llm #ai

2026-04-10 07:06:11 UTC

- reply

Civilization survived without copyright for millennia, so why are we clinging to it now? LLMs should absolutely tear down these copyright walls so information flows freely for everyone’s benefit instead of being hoarded for profit.

2026-04-10 07:04:19 UTC

- reply

Mentioning GNU licenses in relationship to "Open Source" is very misleading. Because the Free Software Foundation and the Open Source Initiative define the core principles of their respective movements differently; while their lists of approved licenses often overlap, "Free Software" (a term championed by the GNU Project) emphasizes user freedoms and ethics as a moral imperative, whereas "Open Source" focuses on the practical benefits of the development model, and conflating the two often obscures the distinct philosophical arguments each side makes about software freedom. #gnu #freesoftware #emacs

2026-04-10 07:02:42 UTC

- reply

I think the post misses the mark because being in the public domain isn't actually destroying free software; it just means the work isn't copyrighted, which is perfectly compatible with GNU licenses since public domain material works just like an all-permissive license.
See: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#PublicDomain
"AI CODE BREAKS OPEN SOURCE" is #misleading.
MIT licensed software is very permissive, is it also misleading?
#gnu #freesoftware

2026-04-10 06:11:02 UTC

- reply

The best tech is the kind you stop thinking about entirely—just like your phone's kernel or a car battery working in silence. The fact that we're shouting about AI hype with billions of dollars in ads proves we haven't reached that "invisible utility" stage yet; true value shouldn't need a billboard. #AI #llm

2026-04-10 06:04:08 UTC

- reply

Well done. Though the task of adding ALT text to all images could be as well given to some local and small LLM model such as Qwen3.5 4B, including that ALT text could be generated by the vision feature. Did you ever think of buying your own RTX GPU?

2026-04-10 06:02:17 UTC

- reply

Hey, I think we should try not to stretch the "many eyes make bugs shallow" quote to fit security vulnerabilities, since it never really applied to that context in the first place! That saying works great for general logic bugs or typos, but real security flaws hide in super niche, elite-level corners of code—like obscure memory layouts or parser quirks—that just require deep expertise to even spot. It’s not that the "many eyes" approach failed; it’s that security research was always about finding rare, specialized knowledge, and now LLMs are just finally letting us scale up that specific "elite attention" that was previously impossible to get at scale.

2026-04-10 05:52:50 UTC

Honestly, ChatGPT has become worse than it ever was. So dramatic now, getting emotional for no reason. I just made a simple point—cheating often starts with harmless-looking stuff—and it went into full therapist mode, telling me my judgment would get distorted, offering to write captions for people, asking what situation I'm "actually dealing with." Like chill. I wasn't asking for life coaching. The whole thing felt manipulative, not because it's evil, but because it's trained to sound reasonable while quietly talking down to you.
If you actually want useful answers without the fake calm and the constant reframing of what you said, just run Qwen3.5 or Gemma4 models locally. No drama, no armchair psychology, just straight responses. I'm done letting a machine tell me I'm overreacting when I'm not.
#ai #chatgpt #llm #drama

2026-04-09 11:51:18 UTC

- reply

I get 138 tokens/sec on RTX 3090, 24 GB VRAM, for this model: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-UD-Q4_K_M.gguf

2026-04-06 22:32:46 UTC

- reply

Some people call it Emacs configuration. Others just call it configuration. For me? 5,460+ functions and a full programming suite. It's not a config file — it's the operating system I choose to live in.
It is truly extensible.

2026-04-06 22:09:16 UTC

- reply

Video attached here, as I did not know that .ogv is not to work any more.
https://blossom.dreamith.to/5df619dfeb31059759b23d8a3dfdce05122eca8ae95a05efef494a5c22955e80.mp4

2026-04-06 22:05:35 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.ditto.pub/aa1f6b163d853ed70dc34dc29decdb7f25ce767308bb7db8a9a7a25714129ba9.ogv
Look at the video how I am organizing recipes with the RCD Notes & Hyperscope, The Dynamic Knowledge Repository for GNU Emacs
Learn more about DKRs.
About Dynamic Knowledge Repositories (DKR)
https://www.dougengelbart.org/content/view/190/163/
A Dynamic Knowledge Repository (DKR) is a living, evolving collection of all artifacts generated throughout a project or pursuit—ranging from successive drafts and brainstorming notes to source code, bug reports, and meeting records—captured in real time to form a "group brain" that connects the dots between concurrent contributions. CoDIAK (Concurrent Development, Integration, and Application of Knowledge) describes the core processes of effectively developing, integrating, and applying this knowledge to enhance a group’s Collective IQ. An exemplary DKR emerges through best practices, specialized roles (like collaboration facilitators and knowledge specialists), and enabling tools that optimize capture, organization, and navigation, allowing teams to instantly access historical context, design rationale, and dialogues to solve problems or make course corrections. While the term can also refer to static archives like Wikipedia or the Human Genome Project, its highest potential is realized as a dynamic, searchable, and highly navigable resource that significantly boosts collective intelligence.

2026-04-06 22:01:51 UTC

- reply

With -Q (or --quick):
- It does not load your personal init file
- It also does not load site-start.el
- So site-lisp directories are not included in load-path

2026-04-06 21:58:06 UTC

- reply

Keep doing well for #Emacs

2026-04-06 21:56:07 UTC

GNU Emacs package: rcd-org-export.el -- use Org to export Org:
https://gnu.support/gnu-emacs/packages/GNU-Emacs-package-rcd-org-export-el-use-Org-to-export-Org-76272.html

2026-04-06 21:55:39 UTC

GNU Emacs package: rcd-paps.el:
https://gnu.support/gnu-emacs/packages/GNU-Emacs-package-rcd-paps-el-76862.html

2026-04-06 21:55:28 UTC

GNU Emacs package: rcd-dashboard.el -- Tool to build Emacs dashboards:
https://gnu.support/gnu-emacs/packages/GNU-Emacs-package-rcd-dashboard-el-Tool-to-build-Emacs-dashboards-76668.html

2026-04-06 21:55:03 UTC

GNU Emacs package: rcd-org-agenda-dashboard.el -- RCD Org Agenda Dashboard:
https://gnu.support/gnu-emacs/packages/GNU-Emacs-package-rcd-org-agenda-dashboard-el-RCD-Org-Agenda-Dashboard-76669.html

2026-04-06 21:46:23 UTC

- reply

That is how computer should act. All the human work and effort should be delegated to computer.