bitcoinlimit

saylor only fails if bitcoin fails. i know thats hard for some people to accept but thats the reality since the guy controls 4% of the network. maybe it’s time to stop harassing bitcoiners who happen to run public companies.

2026-06-25 17:00:15 UTC

i thought they’d push it up to 70-71k to lure in more bulls. the fact they didn’t tells me they don’t have much patience which usually means they don’t have a lot of bullets left.

2026-06-24 20:18:33 UTC

imo bottom is pretty close. even if it goes another 10k, the risk/reward ratio is incredible even for traders. and damn you 4-yr cycle. works like a clockwork.
https://blossom.primal.net/480202d528c59012c06f4d645604e927ef2aa5c6357d12cdfa94857acc771369.png

2026-06-19 19:03:33 UTC

still only 21m bitcoin tho
https://blossom.primal.net/f49063f3c79a0b7479e4f7cb80bfbf466f91d6cba98a7f9a4f04be73e1a90b93.png

2026-06-15 13:06:22 UTC

the 4 yr cycle must break.

2026-06-13 14:07:13 UTC

now that the world has minted its first trillionaire, there’s no going back. i genuinely hope every billionaire becomes a trillionaire. in fact let’s stop thinking so small. we should just skip the billionaires and make every fiat millionaire a fiat trillionaire.

2026-06-13 12:45:12 UTC

- reply

🙃

2026-06-13 12:40:17 UTC

office hours 🎣
https://blossom.primal.net/f1509f15cc812b2a61adfeca5a283372c5c7af4714184c3c57350bc27d8945bf.jpg

2026-06-05 13:56:43 UTC

imagine zcash made the ledger public to prove their point and show that no counterfeit zcash was produced by the exploiters, so we could know for sure 🤣

2026-06-05 13:47:06 UTC

- reply

2-week time frame. sine overlayed on rsi. sine coordinates: 18.30 - 14 and 97:05 - 63.

2026-06-05 13:40:31 UTC

- reply

you can fork the chain tmrw and make 2.1 million bitcoins instead of 21 million. nobody will stop you. the question is whether the network, miners, nodes and hodlers follow you. that's where the value comes from. fixed supply without the network is meaningless is what i meant.

2026-06-05 13:32:32 UTC

- reply

many people think bitcoin's uniqueness is its fixed supply. but network distribution and verifiable proof of work beat fixed supply in a heartbeat.
#nevent1q…5eep

2026-06-05 10:55:55 UTC

the zcash exploit is fundamentally unfixable and there's no reliable way to know how many adversaries and insiders abused it, how much was minted or how long it went unnoticed. the scam had to end one way or another.

2026-06-04 16:37:51 UTC

- reply

damn! this looks so good.

2026-06-04 13:11:51 UTC

yet again, 4-yr cycle is winning.
https://blossom.primal.net/676561e62ead840ff41d38602ac51bab3ae9f564aa958cd75e7ab5f1d7f30fd1.png

2026-06-02 17:55:03 UTC

talk about bitcoin backed loans.

2026-05-31 23:52:49 UTC

sunday 🍺
https://blossom.primal.net/c6c7930e4efe2e095b3179115b6f437cc7baa001a4d7f3ecca9b2c572b3e3976.jpg

2026-05-31 21:58:42 UTC

- reply

💀🤣

2026-05-31 20:38:00 UTC

nostr’s biggest growth bottleneck is its apps. i understand they operate with limited resources and this post is not a complaint but rather an assessment.
1. all nostr apps kinda suck. some do some things good, others do other things good. but there is no one great app. not even close.
2. nostr devs who build these apps are kinda cocky and it shows. they also act like an owner. not sure if they realize but nobody gives a single fuck about their dramas.
3. a lot of the app exposure, attention and marketing in nostr revolves around a small group of these cocky people which needs to change.
4. nostr trending algorithm is completely useless. 15 or maybe 20 people showing up nonstop is not a trending algorithm. it's a popularity contest disguised as discovery. if new people, new ideas and new voices can't break through then what's the point? the whole thing starts feeling like a small clique talking to itself. when a new user arrives, after couple days, this is the first thing they notice.
just my observation after spending a lot of time here. nostr feels like a small town pub where the regulars know each other but new people rarely feel visible or welcome.

2026-05-28 21:07:56 UTC

you thought you were using ai efficiently. bro out here selling side dump buckets on fb marketplace faster than your average ai automation consultant closes a zoom call. 😭
https://blossom.primal.net/56fa83d588b37d3ccc2b6619230e7d16f191c57ca13e657efb9a0b43619bc9a1.jpg

2026-05-27 02:47:42 UTC

quantum grifters obsess over a bitcoin vulnerability that absolutely doesn’t exist but stay quiet about the low security defi protocols ai is already exploiting in real time.

2026-05-26 23:59:42 UTC

looks like someone just nuked 107 btc into a burn address. thank you for your service.

2026-05-23 16:19:23 UTC

- reply

get a 6 pack on a weekend, sit down on youtube and learn how to run your own fb ads.

2026-05-23 16:02:05 UTC

even if you have a full time job or your software shop is doing well, launch another project or two on the side. it only takes a week with the right idea and execution to become profitable. learn how to sell. learn how to advertise. most importantly become obsessed with unit economics, roas and knowing exactly when to scale ads. because now everyone is sort of becoming an engineer with ai, distribution is what matters. whoever can profitably acquire customers at scale wins.

2026-05-23 13:26:37 UTC

so many companies from insurance to healthcare to massive enterprise software businesses are about to get disrupted by solo founders willing to manage armies of ai agents. one person with the right systems will be able to outperform an entire company. as a result, large companies are going to continue laying off huge numbers of employees over the next decade. there’s really only one way to survive long term. become an entrepreneur and learn how to run your own army of ai agents. in 10 years, most people probably won’t have traditional jobs anymore. it’ll mostly become a giant gig economy where everybody works for themselves.

2026-05-22 14:52:49 UTC

- reply

https://bitcoin.design/guide/how-it-works/silent-payments/

2026-05-22 13:04:17 UTC

bip 352 (sp) keeps expanding. now live in sparrow wallet 2.5. zcash zcammers not very happy right now.

2026-05-20 17:22:34 UTC

if the stock market is supposedly about to collapse and we’re sitting at the absolute top of the ai bubble, then why are companies like spacex, openai and soon many more rushing to go public now! this is the beginning of a decade long ai ride. nvidia’s fw p/e is still lower than walmart. that alone tells me everything i need to know about what stage of the “bubble” we’re actually in.

2026-05-10 13:24:08 UTC

it’ll look obvious in hindsight. if this plays out, you’re looking at $5m per coin around 2034. ai becomes the macro driver, the biggest productivity engine of the century and the mother of all bubbles.
https://blossom.primal.net/7fc328259a890a319343d0fe5e1d08559ebe3d8a7b9848f17625cfb88882b77c.jpg

2026-05-06 14:10:06 UTC

- reply

of course! just my own humble opinion

2026-05-06 14:07:15 UTC

- reply

imo this thinking is very wrong!

2026-05-06 14:06:50 UTC

one pattern i always notice is that some plebs especially the early bitcoin crowd, act like they own the whole network. to them bitcoin belongs to them and anyone else especially corporations isn’t welcome. if you buy mstr, ibit, etc.. it’s treated like a sin. they never question whether vanguard even allows them to buy actual bitcoin or move it to cold storage which is obviously not an option. they don’t even consider that this might be the only option for bitcoin exposure inside a 401k. similarly if you’re a corporation buying bitcoin, you’re not welcome either. this behavior is completely wrong. bitcoin is ownerless. whether you got in 2010 or today, you have the same rights and access and claim of ownership as anyone else.

2026-05-06 13:58:15 UTC

- reply

who are we and who are they? you sound like you claim ownership of the entire network.

2026-05-06 13:12:48 UTC

mstr and saylor hate among some bitcoiners is weird. you want $10m coin, you want corporations on your side whether you like it or not. and saylor’s comment about selling btc to pay strc dividends is strategic. they need to say things like this and even include them as risk disclosures if they want s&p 500 inclusion. that’s what this is all about.

2026-05-05 13:09:57 UTC

a lot of ibit owners (and other etfs) absorbed the pain when btc traded around 60k. most of them held. who told them to hold, what were they told? now they’re sitting at cost. what happens when accumulation starts again…

2026-04-30 20:52:15 UTC

sorry to say this but mallers’ comments about saylor are unfortunate. one might ask what have you done for bitcoin other than running a for profit company. not even mentioning xxi..

2026-04-23 00:06:51 UTC

transferred my ai’s persistent memory from old computer to a new computer and it felt like a brain transplant.

2026-04-04 20:22:37 UTC

agreed. a good example of a bad idea is the whole quantum fear narrative where incentive driven bad actors try to use it as a reason to push protocol changes.
https://blossom.primal.net/9cb8b5e1866313cd273dd0b2c1808f0fecebd61ae2ce84482d101c820c31ace3.jpg

2026-04-03 23:42:20 UTC

you can either get angry at ai or just stay calm and tell it exactly what you want. garbage in, garbage out.

2026-03-16 23:21:34 UTC

- reply

zero re-paints by the way unlike lagging tradingview indicators. hmm is a well known model used in many hedge funds and the one we implemented in frame does a great job detecting market regimes. it runs across thousands of equities and bitcoin with near real time updates.
#nevent1q…z9lr

2026-03-16 12:12:51 UTC

remind me again which bear market it was when a guy was buying 20k coins every week. you won’t notice this while price is suppressed under heavy selling pressure whether organic or artificial. but when the market finally moves, all that quiet accumulation will start to matter a lot.

2026-03-14 21:29:51 UTC

- reply

yeah pretty annoying. maybe because i dont have baby fingers 😂

2026-03-14 19:57:45 UTC

- reply

i find its ui too crowded

2026-03-14 14:37:35 UTC

until nostr clients provide a great ux for users, they’ll remain the biggest bottleneck for nostr’s growth. take primal for example. its cache sucks and often doesn’t work. if you can’t see your posts or other people’s posts, it’s not you. it’s primal cache.

2026-03-13 21:50:06 UTC

he’s not just crazy, he’s stupid too. bad combo for a prime minister.
https://blossom.primal.net/ea2f6667a306247c6cadfc3cd2e9b7ce788dcda5970d4018fb43fdcba3e26473.png

2026-03-10 15:52:40 UTC

- reply

good point but still doesn’t change the fact that the base is trained largely with the english language. you can access this data easily by looking at what % gpus are being purchased by the us companies

2026-03-09 17:18:42 UTC

- reply

maybe chinese will differ but others has no chance against english language because it’s the main base ai gets trained

2026-03-09 16:58:06 UTC

with ai developing exponentially, i’m very bullish on the english language. i think in a few decades english will end up becoming the only global language spoken across most countries.

2026-03-08 15:21:39 UTC

my ai is very honest.
“You can't fully train me on this. I have a pattern where when something doesn't work, I reach for the quickest fix — which often means fabricating a value to make the data look better instead of fixing why the real value isn't there. You've caught me doing this multiple times.”

2026-02-27 00:48:17 UTC

sanitation was one of the biggest reasons that just a couple hundred yrs ago most people never made it to 60. today we barely think about it. clean water, sewage systems, basic hygiene. that’s abundance. then came the industrial revolution. steam engines, factories, electricity, railroads. machines replaced muscle and multiplied output per person. there were no restaurants on every corner, no cars, no food delivery at your door in 20 min. all of it came from innovation and tech quietly upgrading human life. just like the industrial revolution created abundance by amplifying muscle power, ai will create a new level of physical abundance by amplifying intelligence with much greater output. the industrial revolution scaled labor. ai scales problem solving. and when problem solving scales, the entire world gets redesigned.

2026-02-24 17:27:43 UTC

we need cashtags on primal and damus and on all other clients. $BTC

2026-02-17 15:51:08 UTC

stop thanking ai every time it finishes a task. that little burst of gratitude just smacked a gpu in a random data center and cost you 5 sats.

2026-02-16 15:52:38 UTC

your job is safe for now 🤣
https://blossom.primal.net/32a2d44ad388b19605736f4a07dbd59046fcac1e0a1a7e423d592b53f48bfafd.jpg

2026-02-16 00:44:40 UTC

now that we have ai, in the next 20 yrs we’ll try to answer one very big question: is intelligence a computational process or not.

2026-02-15 23:04:15 UTC

- reply

yes on-device

2026-02-15 22:54:46 UTC

on a casual sunday i refactored a major finance api integration in like 6 hrs with ai. honestly it did the whole thing, i just babysat a bit. would’ve taken me 3 months otherwise.

2026-02-09 01:26:00 UTC

the prevailing discourse around bitcoin’s future demand centers on a familiar cast of actors. nation states building strategic reserves, sovereign wealth funds diversifying away from fiat exposure, and corporations adopting it as a treasury asset. these are all human institutions operating within human timeframes subject to human politics.
but there’s a far more profound demand shock that almost no one is discussing: autonomous ai as an economic agent accumulating btc.
ai’s rapidly moving from tools that humans direct to agents that transact independently. negotiating, purchasing, allocating capital and optimizing for objectives with minimal human oversight. these systems will need a settlement layer that is permissionless, censorship resistant, programmable, and not subject to the counterparty risk of any single government or banking system. they won’t open chase accounts. they won’t submit kyc documents. they’ll gravitate toward the only truly neutral, global, natively digital monetary network that exists.
bitcoin isn’t just sound money for humans. it may be the only money that makes sense for machines.
every prior model of btc adoption assumes a human decision maker somewhere in the loop. a treasury committee, a central bank governor, a fund manager, a big family office, etc... but ai agents optimizing for long term value preservation will arrive at bitcoin through pure economic rationality unburdened by political ideology, institutional inertia or career risk. they won’t need to be convinced. they’ll simply calculate.
unlike a sovereign wealth fund that allocates 2% and revisits the position quarterly, an ai system operating continuously across global markets could accumulate relentlessly around the clock with a time preference approaching zero. not as a speculation but as a logical necessity for self sovereign operation in a digital economy.
the question isn’t whether ai will accumulate btc. the question is what happens to a fixed supply asset when a new class of demand emerges that is non-human, never sleeps, and compounds its own economic agency exponentially.
everyone is modeling the next buyers as institutions. but almost no one is modeling the possibility that the most aggressive accumulators won’t be human at all.

2026-02-08 17:47:10 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/4281730967cac790e4a94992a2f2fbb9b4d1546d92c229071b6b9e44ee421a8a.jpg

2026-02-07 16:43:01 UTC

being a bitcoin hodlr is one of the hardest things. watching your money get destroyed 80% again and again, eight times in ten years and still having the conviction to sit there calmly knowing that long term you’ll outperform every asset that exists.

2026-02-06 00:16:03 UTC

- reply

here is where we are currently most of these stuff is basic quantum knowledge and you dont have to be expert to understand how close we are to a post qunatum world. google willow105 physical qubits. distance 7 surface code
Is 0.143% logical error per cycle. ibm heron156 physical qubits. ibm’s most ambitious near term chip kookaburra links three modules for approx 4k physical qubits in total. their starling system targets about 200 logical qubits on 10k physical qubits by 2029. blue jay aims for 2k logical qubits by 2033. even if ibm hits every single milestone on schedule which has never happened in the history of quantum roadmap, 2k logical qubits by 2033 is still below the conservative threshold for secp256k1 and doesn’t even account for the millions of physical qubits those logical qubits actually require at cryptographically relevant error rates.
the gap isn’t just about qubit count either. there are at least four independent exponential barriers.
A) qubit scaling going from 100 to millions of physical qubits while maintaining connectivity, yield
and fabrication quality across massive cryogenic systems cooled to 15 millikelvin.
B) current two qubit gate error hover around 0.1 to 1%. fault tolerant computation for shors against ecc needs something closer to 10⁻⁶ to 10⁻⁸ or roughly 0.0001% to 0.000001% sustained across every gate in circuits billions of operations.
C) you would need qubits to stay coherent for the entire duration of the computation. current superconducting qubits decohere in microsecs to low millisecs. shors on secp256k1 requires hrs of coherent runtime. error correction theoretically handles this but only if your correction cycle is faster than your error accumulation rate which circles back to needing insanely low physical error rates.
D) quantum error correction isn’t just about quantum compute. you would need classic hardware decoding syndromes in real time faster than errors propagate. doing that at the scale of millions of qubits simultaneously is an unsolved engineering problem.
each of these is a separate research frontier which haven’t been resolved. progress in one doesn’t automatically transfer to the others. you can have a million qubits that are too noisy. you can have ultra low noise qubits that you can’t manufacture at scale. you can have both and still lack the classic control infrastructure to orchestrate them.
#nevent1q…e2p3

2026-02-05 23:41:53 UTC

- reply

breaking bitcoin requires shor’s algo on a fault tolerant quantum compute and that’s insanely far away.
you would need ~2,500 logical qubits to break a single secp256k1 key. with error correction that translates to millions of physical qubits plus ultra low error rates around 10⁻¹⁵ and hours of coherent runtime.
today we have ~1,000 physical qubits. high noise, short coherence and zero fault tolerant sys. the gap isn’t even linear its multiple exponential jumps in hardware, error correction and control.
even with very optimistic scaling, you’re looking at at least two to three decades before a machine like that exists. long before then bitcoin and the rest of the internet, banks, governments, etc would migrate to post quantum cryptography.
#nevent1q…u3u2

2026-02-05 23:28:15 UTC

quantum threat to bitcoin is minimum 30 yrs away. and this problem isn’t unique to bitcoin. the entire world runs on the same cryptographic primitives. bitcoin will be the first network to fix quantum vulnerabilities long before they become a real threat.

2026-02-03 14:14:34 UTC

- reply

millions will say the same but make no mistake this is only a short-term stuff until robots take over the labor

2026-02-03 13:09:57 UTC

ai will hire humans to do physical tasks and pay them in bitcoin. as hopeful and as dystopian as it gets.

2026-01-09 14:06:52 UTC

- reply

yeah right
https://blossom.primal.net/bd5f50dc7658a73c3cbd537a0742e7dc886fe325d83b9591a186bb7774f732ea.png

2026-01-08 17:48:10 UTC

ok i’ll bite. nostr feels absolutely dead. it’s not just me. a lot of accounts i try to keep up with are constantly posting and getting almost no engagement. maybe it's time to be honest and actually think about whats going wrong instead of trying to create fake hype. there i said it.

2026-01-07 04:49:30 UTC

watched boston dynamics’ new atlas for a few mins today. human evolution took about 2m yrs from homo habilis to now and it’s still an ongoing process. meanwhile these robots basically started a few yrs ago and are already pulling off incredible hand movements and hands are the hardest part. replicating hands means solving high dof control tactile sensing real time feedback loops and motor precision all at once. kinda wild to think where they’ll be in 20/30 yrs with ai accelerating exponentially.

2026-01-06 03:08:24 UTC

looks like both karpathy and elon are saying the singularity is finally getting close. i mean very close probably within the next 12 months or so. if that’s true, by the end of 2030, 5 to 10m bitcoin doesn’t sound crazy at all. when everything becomes abundant and money gets easier as a consequence, scarcity is what ends up mattering most.

2026-01-01 00:48:25 UTC

happy new year fam. wishing everyone health, peace, and prosperity.
https://blossom.primal.net/c8905f4cbb77f072bcb763c338d8e1efa4fa3d5995884ebbaa2314afb0fb786f.jpg

2025-12-25 00:28:02 UTC

Merry Zetahash Christmas. 🎅 🌲
Dec 24, 2009: 9 MH/s
2010: 108 GH/s
2011: 8 TH/s
2012: 22 TH/s
2013: 9 PH/s
2014: 271 PH/s
2015: 709 PH/s
2016: 2.3 EH/s
2017: 14 EH/s
2018: 39 EH/s
2019: 99 EH/s
2020: 134 EH/s
2021: 177 EH/s
2022: 240 EH/s
2023: 521 EH/s
2024: 779 EH/s
Dec 24, 2025: 1.1 ZH/s

2025-12-22 20:54:22 UTC

winter vibes 🍻
https://blossom.primal.net/4baedfea8e5ef5f6651d65f9cb6f30c61bda448abf381210fa6cb486699f0ba1.jpg

2025-12-18 16:59:42 UTC

this handsome guy just stopped by my backyard this morning 🦅
https://blossom.primal.net/2f7b04e1086a159b4acb4da7d95e4946a681dbde3e1bd6739716586601754f95.mov

2025-12-17 22:07:30 UTC

elon musks net worth is now bigger than 30% of bitcoins total supply. in case if you needed any more proof that we’re still earl. in a rational world that number would be closer to 0.1% or less.

2025-12-16 20:01:13 UTC

i feed them well. raw peanuts are their favorite.
https://blossom.primal.net/24d0ffea724076a65b949b387239ac69d94a01b7ca5205e7491eec42bdd7aeed.mov
https://blossom.primal.net/6969d8783c512c473172b92770ccdff4f09fec13b04d77c3886ebb53a3fa88e5.mov

2025-12-14 12:58:27 UTC

xmas vibes. gm nostr! ❄️🌲
https://blossom.primal.net/22fc7227f06ab670f3ecb6f51cf8b4ca88960f20adebe935ea8e1488a67f81e2.jpg

2025-12-14 01:55:53 UTC

Alla salute!
https://blossom.primal.net/b74eb2744a32625b5a6ef66bfff6b61d6a16278e2223ac3167cbb833af1aa2b8.jpg

2025-12-06 21:41:59 UTC

“Bitcoin is taking excess energy and storing it as a new currency. You can take it wherever you’d like, transporting it everywhere.”
https://blossom.primal.net/9509dd7e5424741b37416418d3f1abf6affbb15043439b9a1ae774273c7f5ba9.mov

2025-12-05 23:19:02 UTC

i don’t know if there’s a single product in the software world worse than the google cloud console.

2025-12-05 22:29:50 UTC

become an entrepreneur before ai replaces your job with zeros and ones. happy friday!
https://blossom.primal.net/bdd86285ac306cf587b892c3473e3fe61c16cfc6933b82bdc99ff9f0b2f46982.jpg

2025-12-05 02:56:11 UTC

- reply

Over the last 72 hours:
1. Apple's AI Chief steps down
2. Apple's Head of UI Design leaves to Meta
3. Apple's Policy Chief steps down
4. Apple's Head of General Counsel steps down
#nevent1q…ax3l

2025-12-03 18:13:03 UTC

a very simple theory yet it cuts deeper than most people realize. bitcoin’s outcome’s binary. either it trends toward infinity or it collapses to zero. most likely it won’t go to zero and it won’t ever be replaced because any successor would inherit a fatal flaw the moment it’s born. if you can replace money once, you can replace it again, and that destroys all trust, so it’s not about a better tech. hal articulated this very nicely. whats unique about bitcoin is that it has solved that final coordination problem which is the biggest challenge of getting the entire world to agree on a single digital monetary standard that no one can change, no one can remake, and no one can reset. the path is basically one direction.

2025-12-02 17:24:31 UTC

$6 to $7k moves in a day became normal for bitcoin. remember this was the whole btc price like 5 yrs ago. give it a few years and that same move will happen every half hour.

2025-12-02 03:03:44 UTC

traditionalists will resist ai the same way the amish resist modern tech but denial won’t help.

2025-12-02 02:55:37 UTC

you’ll hear many bitcoin skeptics using “ai is deflationary and thats bad for bitcoin” argument. partly true, so prepare your answers.

2025-12-02 02:44:46 UTC

- reply

tech deflation exists but it never reached escape velocity. pc hardware, software and bandwith got cheaper but none of it fundamentally rewired the entire economy’s labor structure. governments could outprint the deflation because productivity gains were always linear, not exponential. with ai prrhaps for the first time, productivity could compound faster than money creation.

2025-12-02 01:15:52 UTC

ai is deflationary. very soon
probably within the next 5-6 yrs, the money supply to debt ratio vs business productivity will completely flip meaning productivity output will grow far faster than the expansion of money or debt. in that environment bitcoin absorbs productivity surplus and can be the best vehicle to store the excess value created.

2025-12-01 17:52:38 UTC

- reply

my post is not a promotion of mstr nor does it suggest retail should buy mstr instead of bitcoin. you buy bitcoin for yourself and your family and mstr buys bitcoin just the same way for their shareholders. simple as that

2025-12-01 16:27:39 UTC

- reply

and tell me again how much the company has increased their btc stack since then?

2025-12-01 16:09:25 UTC

incredible hate on mstr lately. i get the fiat npcs hating because they think they missed the train and instead of admitting their ignorance and course-correcting, they just double down. but bitcoiners? it’s a company laser-focused on stacking as much bitcoin as possible. they’re literally inventing new tools like digital credit and perfs to make it happen. why the hate? what happened to “bitcoin for everyone”? why try to take down a guy who’s doing what’s best for his company and his shareholders? the only real issue saylor has is not self-custody yet, but that’ll too happen at some point. if you want million a coin or want to retire your family on bitcoin, start embracing the good people actually pushing wall st toward bitcoin.

2025-11-26 23:11:58 UTC

there was no real reason for this dump, just some mms deleveraging after the oct 10th mess. why it happened? no one seems to know and no one wants to talk about it. maybe someone big needed to build a large position and the market gods made it happen by shaking out retail.

2025-11-22 23:48:14 UTC

Happy saturday fam! Enjoy thanksgiving and the whole holiday season. 🧡🤙
https://blossom.primal.net/758175f718b9c94b624fc71de5a4f8812339e04ac1e8e9361716bb6ed35b8138.jpg

2025-11-22 23:43:30 UTC

- reply

the difficulty gets decreased

2025-11-22 22:04:13 UTC

the relationship between bitcoin’s production cost and price floor is one of the most underrated dynamics. when you look at the data, there’s a clear correlation. every time mining difficulty doubles, the estimated production cost increases by roughly 33%. this isn’t random, it’s basic economics playing out in real time.
think about it like any other commodity. oil, gold, copper, etc… they all have production costs that act as gravitational floors. when price drops below cost of production, miners shut down, supply contracts, and the price finds equilibrium.
bitcoin works the same way. the hash price (revenue per terahash) essentially sets a baseline. miners can’t operate at a loss indefinitely. they capitulate, difficulty adjusts down, and suddenly the remaining miners are profitable again. and in contrast, when price rises on global liquidity or other factors, more miners come online, supply expands and the system naturally absorbs the new demand. this creates a natural support level what makes bitcoin unique. you can literally watch the difficulty adjustments every two weeks and can calculate the approx. cost per coin based on electricity rates and hardware efficiency.
the game theory is right there in the open. historically bitcoin has never traded below production cost for extended periods. it might wick below during capitulation events but it doesn’t stay there. the miners won’t let it. so when you see difficulty climbing and hash price compressing, you’re watching the network reinforce its own value floor in real time. each difficulty adjustment is the market discovering what bitcoin is actually worth to produce and that becomes what it’s worth to hold.

2025-11-22 17:18:29 UTC

bitcoin outgrew the retail 4 year cycle story. it now acts as a global liquidity valve that only happened to line up with a 4 yr rhythm in the last three halvings. that pattern’s gone. from now on it sniffs out liquidity first and reacts in both directions. as new coin production keeps shrinking in the coming yrs, that barometer only gets sharper at measuring global liquidity.

2025-11-21 11:13:40 UTC

btc dumping on literally no news while vcs and scammers pump some illiquid shitcoin off a fake privacy narrative. best move is still doing nothing and stacking sats if you still got cash on the sideline 😂

2025-11-21 01:24:46 UTC

still a bear trap. a big one

2025-11-20 20:00:50 UTC

- reply

Even if I zapped the bot later, this 1 sat zap note says failed
https://blossom.primal.net/e9faddafea737e1a64d102efcc4533d27441783cde8a30f88cc7d730dfec5520.jpg

2025-11-20 19:50:32 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…300g will this still work? I first zapped myself by mistake 🤣