Karubin

M21, Languages: 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 🇯🇵 Bisexual, Polyamorous ❤️♾️🤍, MAP 💙🩵💛🤍🤍💛🩷❤️ DM friendly.

Session: 0552132a3920ac6895b421edff66ce0f8e014ce8451301b30bd913be1e5ba90037

Telegram: Nepinluv
Limits: Scat, Beastiality, Gore, Necrophilia, Rape

Last Notes

2025-03-28 03:39:13 UTC

- reply

It's so low res I can't tell what it is.

2025-03-28 03:26:18 UTC

- reply

Okay, just don't start saying sosu after every sentence plz.

2025-03-24 16:45:41 UTC

- reply

Never used element, do u have tele or session?

2025-03-24 16:33:34 UTC

- reply

by evidence I meant videos.

2025-03-24 16:27:03 UTC

Who can get it the hardest?

2025-03-24 15:17:28 UTC

- reply

Well, under that context, it's very easy to solve. If you request permission and they offer it to you, arguing against ability to consent is pretty silly. However, if we take verbal ability away, it's pretty sticky since any physical advances that lead to a negative reaction would be an obvious violation of their sexual consent. (Funny enough, this method of logic itself implies that a child can consent) On the other hand, though, if that child reciprocates the advances positively, there is clearly no violation of sexual consent. If the child has no ability to consent, there could be no variation in the reactions to being sexually pursued. Obviously, there's no way to prove what the reality of this situation is without observing evidence that would be illegal to view in real life, which is why I didn't want to argue about babies.

2025-03-24 15:07:02 UTC

- reply

I agree with you, but in order to go there with babies we'd have to get into illegal territory, which I'd rather avoid. (At least, I'm assuming the whole consent started over sexual consent, but I wasn't there for the original threads.)

2025-03-24 14:33:22 UTC

- reply

Idk ab yall but the toddlers I know are capable of saying yes when they want something and no when they don't. Babies can't even speak, not even gonna attempt to address solving consent there. As for animals, also pretty hard to summarize a conclusion on it, so no comments from me.

2025-03-24 13:36:55 UTC

- reply

Animals is debatable but toddlers? Can't say I agree with that one.

2025-03-24 12:41:35 UTC

- reply

For the bettet or worse?