wymike

Public Key

npub1ncrx9aecyw72ft2qpcnvdu469ak0d8ttn4prs0exvty9s3hwu9vsrvg998

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsfupnz7uuz809y44qqufkx72az7m8kn44e6s3c8unx9jzcgmhwzkgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dskuxw99

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1ncrx9aecyw72ft2qpcnvdu469ak0d8ttn4prs0exvty9s3hwu9vsrvg998

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-04-04 07:49:00 UTC

- reply

Presumably every other country and company that has ever put anything in space is in on the same giant scam?
I’m impressed with your tenacity in spite of the overwhelming body of evidence in opposition to your hypothesis.

2026-03-20 02:43:13 UTC

- reply

😂

2026-03-20 01:55:33 UTC

- reply

Neither- shataf is the only way

2026-03-18 14:01:25 UTC

- reply

Teal

2026-03-11 15:01:46 UTC

- reply

I hate going to countries that don’t have a shataf in the bathroom. Heathens.

2026-03-09 10:27:58 UTC

- reply

Easy to say from the other side of the world

2026-02-28 18:34:45 UTC

- reply

Falling debris from an intercept. Apparently 4 people injured.

2026-02-28 02:54:58 UTC

- reply

I have personally seen Saturn, with my own eyes, through a telescope. It looked more like the ‘fake’ image you’re presenting than the ‘real’ image. And that wasn’t even a particularly powerful telescope.
Some of your conspiracy theories are so laughable it makes me wonder are you just trying to deflect attention from genuine conspiracies that have genuine consequences if true?

2026-02-21 19:54:54 UTC

- reply

Haven’t seen tent pegs like that since I was in the scouts xx years agoz
(xx = too many 😬)

2026-02-19 09:43:04 UTC

- reply

B - teachers
Image a world where all teachers understood the value proposition of Bitcoin and passed this on to all of their students.
Orange pill teaches, Orange pill the world.

2026-02-19 03:19:00 UTC

- reply

I don’t understand the narrative that we need big centralised miners.
If nation states start to adopt bitcoin there will be an arms race of hash power to ensure their bitcoin isn’t stolen.
If they don’t but plebs continue to believe in bitcons value proposition there will be thousands of solo miners.
In both scenarios the difficulty adjustment will compensate for the change in hash rate.
Just because a company won’t be able to make money from mining doesn’t mean there will be no mining. There was mining before the big mining companies and I don’t see why there would not be mining if they disappear.

2026-02-19 02:28:44 UTC

- reply

Can you explain to this wine pleb why them thinking it was a Burgandy was a good thing pls ?

2026-02-18 18:26:38 UTC

- reply

Ethnicity ≠ Species

2026-02-14 03:08:18 UTC

- reply

Thanks. I can see the words are English. My comment was intended to draw attention to the fact that while the words are English the language is unintelligible to me.

2026-02-14 02:59:34 UTC

- reply

Can anyone translate this into English for me?

2026-02-13 18:26:32 UTC

- reply

Are you trolling or do you really not understand the difference between what is happening in these two clips?

2026-02-10 09:09:58 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…sfgr had anyone else reported that you can’t remove likes on iOS?

2026-02-10 09:09:01 UTC

- reply

Have you considered that if this information was not available to the public it’s reasonable to assume that Jack didn’t have access to it either.
Guilt by association is not the same thing as being complicit in the acts.
If you did business with someone who later was revealed as a child rapist does that make you also a terrible person.
If, as you are implying, any who has done business with someone named in the Epstein files deserves to be treated in the same way as the people actually named that’s a lot of people. Most of whom probably had no clue.
If Trump is named does that mean that anyone who has ever had business with him is also tainted?
If Larry Fink is named same question?
I don’t know if Jack had prior knowledge and I’m sure you don’t either so let’s not tar him with the same brush simply because he did business with them.

2026-02-07 13:37:24 UTC

- reply

Why is questioning a poorly evidenced argument cope?
I have no horse in this race. It doesn’t impact my life in any way. But if you’re going to claim something is backed by science the least you can do is show up the a complete set of receipts.

2026-02-07 08:36:14 UTC

- reply

There is not enough information in that snippet to draw any conclusions.
How big was the sample size?
Did it control for socioeconomic status before the baby?
Were there comparable groups with none mixed race parents?
As presented this a cherry picking at its finest.

2026-02-06 18:04:06 UTC

- reply

Wouldn’t the conductive spire eventually reach an electrostatic equilibrium with the aether?
If not why not?
By what mechanism does the spire ‘collecting’ the electrical charge cause the mercury to start spinning?
How was the electricity generated from the spinning mercury?
If the spire is ‘collecting’ electrostatic energy why convert that into spinning mercury then back to electricity?

2026-02-06 15:20:27 UTC

- reply

The question is it just lack of knowledge or wilful ignorance?
They love to paint themselves as critical thinkers but are unable to apply basic established knowledge to their line of questioning.

2026-02-06 13:52:23 UTC

- reply

The sun is a fusion reaction
Fusion does not require oxygen

2026-02-06 13:45:39 UTC

- reply

1 - All elements necessary for the combustion are contained within the rocket fuel.
2 - For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
When the fuel combusts it expand rapidly and is forced out of the combustion chamber.
This in turn has an effect equal and opposite effect of propelling the rocket in the opposite direction.

2026-02-04 18:00:09 UTC

- reply

I was not aware all men were attracted to the same things.

2026-02-01 04:11:31 UTC

- reply

TLDR
4. Classical Hinduism (c. 200 BCE–500 CE): cow becomes sacred
By this period:
• Texts like the Dharmashastras explicitly condemn cow slaughter.

2026-02-01 03:53:21 UTC

- reply

I’m not sure coordinated psyops were underway 1500 years ago in India.🤷
👇From Chat GPT
Here is the historically accepted progression:
⸻
1. Early Vedic period (c. 1500–1000 BCE): cows were valued, not forbidden
In the earliest Vedic texts:
• Cows were economically central (milk, butter/ghee, dung for fuel, traction).
• Animal sacrifice did occur, and cattle may occasionally have been eaten, especially in ritual or elite contexts.
• Even then, cows were already symbolically important and associated with wealth and status.
Key point: cows were respected, but not absolutely protected.
⸻
2. Later Vedic → Upanishadic period (c. 1000–500 BCE): shift toward non-violence
Major philosophical changes occurred:
• Growing emphasis on ahimsa (non-violence).
• Ritual sacrifice began to be questioned and symbolised rather than literal.
• Cows increasingly framed as providers rather than consumables.
This period marks the moral turning point.
⸻
3. Influence of Jainism and Buddhism (c. 600–200 BCE)
Two major movements strongly reinforced cow protection:
• Jainism: radical non-violence; killing animals strictly prohibited.
• Buddhism: rejection of ritual animal sacrifice and emphasis on compassion.
Hindu thinkers responded by:
• Absorbing ahimsa into mainstream Hindu ethics.
• Distancing Hindu identity from sacrificial killing.
⸻
4. Classical Hinduism (c. 200 BCE–500 CE): cow becomes sacred
By this period:
• Texts like the Dharmashastras explicitly condemn cow slaughter.
• The cow is framed as “Gau Mata” (Mother Cow).
• Killing a cow is equated with severe moral pollution or sin.
At the same time:
• Dairy (milk, curd, ghee) becomes central to ritual and diet.
• Protecting cows is linked to social order (dharma).
⸻
5. Medieval period (c. 1000–1700 CE): identity marker
During Islamic rule in parts of India:
• Beef consumption by Muslim communities contrasted with Hindu taboos.
• Cow protection became a clear religious boundary marker.
• Hindu rulers often enacted bans on cow slaughter in their territories.
The taboo became socially absolute for most Hindu communities.
⸻
6. Colonial & modern period (1700s–present): politicisation
Under British rule and later:
• Cow protection movements became tied to Hindu nationalism.
• Post-independence India enshrined cow protection in many state laws.
• Today, avoidance of beef is both a religious practice and a cultural-political symbol.

2026-02-01 03:46:57 UTC

- reply

😂

2026-02-01 03:38:00 UTC

- reply

Maybe that bit was misplayed- Jay was talking about “ a future that vegans and fake meat producers are trying to lead us toward. “

2026-02-01 03:22:25 UTC

- reply

I have been to India several times and in my experience the biggest risk for food poisoning is hands / cutlery / water that salad is washed in.
One time my wife and I shared a roast chicken. She wise violently ill with food poisoning and I was fine.
I’ve eaten street food in Mumbai without issue but was violently ill after having a drink with ice in it from an airport bar in Khatmandu.
My rule of thumb is if it’s hot and my hands are clean I’ll be fine.

2026-02-01 03:17:17 UTC

- reply

Cows are sacred to Hindus who make up almost 80% of the population of India. This not a new thing and has nothing to do with any ‘conspiracy’ to wean people off meat.

2026-01-27 17:21:36 UTC

- reply

Wouldn’t that make the narrative “we need guns to loose our freedoms more slowly“ ?

2026-01-21 13:26:57 UTC

- reply

Tell me you don’t understand Bitcoin without telling me you don’t understand Bitcoin

2026-01-21 06:07:35 UTC

What happens in a design process that allows something that is objectively terrible to keep progressing?
Looking at you Apple, liquid glass is terrible.
#asknostr #apple #liquidglass

2026-01-17 02:53:55 UTC

- reply

What’s the other option for the second guy?
How many times does the scenario repeat?
Can you just kick the can down the road indefinitely? (Like governments do…)

2026-01-17 02:31:27 UTC

- reply

What’s this guys name?

2026-01-16 18:16:49 UTC

- reply

Statue

2026-01-04 13:20:20 UTC

- reply

What’s the prediction market equivalent of having knowledge that others don’t?

2026-01-03 16:22:34 UTC

- reply

I also read all the words.
From what I can see it’s talking about the ‘policing’ of waterways around Manhattan for the purposes of protecting dignitaries visiting the UN.
It’s literally called “Security Zones; Dignitary Arrival/Departure and United Nations Meetings, New York, NY.”
If these words have some alternate meaning please enlighten us.

2026-01-02 03:11:46 UTC

- reply

Not subjugating them and giving them their land back might be a good start.
You have to remember that this all started with the creation of the Israeli state without the consent of Palestinian people who were living there at the time.

2026-01-01 03:31:27 UTC

- reply

Don’t get me wrong when you read this, I absolutely condemn what Hamas did and has been doing for a long time. But it’s also possible, at the same time, to see that what Isreal is doing and has been doing for a long time is also not right.
What I’m hearing you say is that it’s justified for all of the Palestinians to be killed because that’s the only way to stop Hamas. So you’d be OK with all of your countrymen being wiped out if there were was a small percentage of the population acting as Hamas has been doing? You’d be OK with all of the non ‘Hamas’ people being hemmed in, bombed and starved to death?
Maybe, if Isreal hadn’t been pursuing and agenda of expansion since its inception the Islamist jihadists wouldn’t be such an issue…? After all Jews, Christians and Arabs have managed to live side by side in that part of the world before.

2025-12-31 01:56:20 UTC

- reply

In the UK the government has an approval rating of less than 20%.
Imagine something similar happening between the UK (representing Hamas) and the US (representing Israel).
Do you think every person in the UK deserves to die even though 50% didn’t vote for that government and 80% now don’t approve of them?
Once Hamas we’re in power how easy do you think it would have been for the Palestinians to remove them if they wanted to? I suspect not very.
What about the children who were not even born when Hamas was voted in? Are they also complicit and deserve to die.
All of this is not even touching on the fact that Isreal was land taken from the Palestinians without their consent.

2025-12-30 17:53:58 UTC

- reply

So you’re not denying Israel funded hamas?
If so, got to ask yourself why you would provide funding to someone you know hates you?

2025-12-30 02:20:05 UTC

- reply

It’s spelt ‘don’t’

2025-12-30 02:18:01 UTC

- reply

1) making October 7th the start of this is to ignore the previous 80(?) years.
2) You’ve missed out the bit about Israel funding hamas…

2025-12-26 03:12:31 UTC

- reply

The irony of Minecraft Lego is not lost on me.

2025-12-23 16:40:50 UTC

- reply

2025-12-23 14:34:58 UTC

- reply

Am I to take it from your list that the Linux foundation has nothing to do with Linux?

2025-12-23 14:30:01 UTC

- reply

I’d refer you back to the earlier post about the challenges of flying over the North Pole and the high concentration of solar radiation there which I would imagine would make photography challenging.
Also, would it be a high value shot. It wouldn’t look any different than any other photo of a star.
But I suppose the lack of said photographs is, if you squint, evidence that no one is allowed to go to the North Pole.

2025-12-23 14:01:58 UTC

Current Bitcoin price of Revolut
~£64,800
Current Bitcoin price on my limit buy order on Revolut ~£65,800
Why is there a £1000 spread?!?
#asknostr

2025-12-23 05:55:12 UTC

- reply

Because your mass is being acted upon my the sun and moon?

2025-12-23 05:53:59 UTC

- reply

Why?

2025-12-23 05:16:40 UTC

- reply

Is this aimed at me?
My world model and the physics required for it to work do not need me to prove there is a giant machine powered by infinite energy creating the tides.
There is a massive body of reproducible work holding up the theory that the earth is an oblate spheroid and that tides are caused by gravity / the sun and moon.

2025-12-23 05:12:47 UTC

- reply

Me? No not I won’t but others have been. Unless your argument is that everyone who has ever claimed to have been into space is lying along with everyone else involved in the projects.
How does your world model explain the osteoporosis observed in astronauts who have been in ‘space’ for a long time? I guess that’s a lie as well?

2025-12-23 05:08:30 UTC

- reply

The argument that no-one has been to the North /South Pole is so pathetically weak it’s not even worth addressing.

2025-12-23 05:06:06 UTC

- reply

Also what is powering this?

2025-12-23 05:05:53 UTC

- reply

If this was the case we would observe tides moving a north - south (or middle-outside for the flat earthers) which is not the case. High and low tide are not at the same time for all places on the same latitude.
Simply observing a wave tank shows us that this theory cannot accurately explain the tidal phenomenon that we observe and is very well explained by accepted physics.

2025-12-23 04:38:41 UTC

- reply

🙄

2025-12-23 04:19:26 UTC

- reply

How many countries that installed large wind farms have cheaper energy now than before they installed them? The UK certainly doesn’t.

2025-12-23 04:17:13 UTC

- reply

Seems likely, so many opportunities for us not to have got this far.

2025-12-23 04:12:30 UTC

- reply

My personal position is that there is / was / will be other life in the universe but we’ll probably never know about it.

2025-12-23 04:09:18 UTC

- reply

That doesn’t answer any of my questions though.

2025-12-23 04:08:01 UTC

- reply

Yep, but maybe they are so far away that they haven’t reached us yet.
Or maybe we’re not looking for the right things.
Or maybe life that we might be able to observe hasn’t evolved far enough for us to observe.
Or maybe it came and went long before we even started looking.

2025-12-23 03:55:45 UTC

- reply

There’s a formula (Greenspan? Green-something-) that tries to estimate how many planets have life (or could sustain life, I don’t recall exactly). In essence it says that even though the probability of life is so small, the universe is so vast that it’s almost a certainty that it will happen a bunch of times.
Add to this we’re only looking for planets that could sustain life as we understand it.
And
Because the universe is so vast and old the chances of life happening somewhere else and us being able to observe it are still incredibly small.

2025-12-23 03:40:08 UTC

- reply

How does this theory;
Explain the formation of stars/galaxies/planets?
Explain tides and the motion of the moon?
Explain why all objects accelerate towards the earth at the same rate in a vacuum?
Explain how we can calculate the upward lift required to allow a plane to stay in the sky?
But most of all why?
Why did Freemasons want to convince everyone that the earth is a ball? What did they gain from that?

2025-12-20 03:43:16 UTC

- reply

What’s this referring too?

2025-12-20 03:36:26 UTC

- reply

If it was in the US they probably would have shown up with a gun instead of a knife…

2025-12-18 18:49:53 UTC

- reply

Guns don’t kill people, hate speech does

2025-12-18 03:12:47 UTC

- reply

Generally, it threatens the status quo which threatens there positions of power.

2025-12-18 03:09:52 UTC

- reply

CERN proved the existence of the Higgs boson.
Impossible to say what the utility of this will be in the future.
We’d be in a much more basic world without funding for science.

2025-12-16 02:38:39 UTC

- reply

Passports existed for centuries, but they were not used widely to control movement until the early 20th century.
Before the 19th century, travel documents were rare, informal, and selective, mainly letters of safe conduct for merchants or diplomats. Most ordinary people could cross borders without documentation.
During much of the 19th century, passport requirements actually declined, especially in Europe, as liberal ideas and new transport systems made travel easier and borders more open.
The decisive change came with World War I (1914–1918). Governments introduced mandatory passports to manage security, military conscription, and large population movements. Crucially, these wartime controls were not dismantled after the war.
In the 1920s, the League of Nations standardised passport formats and border controls, embedding them into international governance. By the mid-20th century, passports had become a universal and permanent tool for regulating international movement.

2025-12-13 17:21:58 UTC

- reply

3, easiest place to sleep. I have nothing to say to any of these people.

2025-12-08 02:09:48 UTC

- reply

So more accurate would have been -
'Whore' is a Biblical term and the appropriate term for 9 out of 10 Western people today.
Instead you choose to single out women to make it seem like they are the problem. 🤷

2025-12-07 02:52:53 UTC

- reply

Can you back that up past it just being your opinion? Are you suggesting that pleasure counts as a form of payment?
When the term "whore" or its equivalents (such as "prostitute" or "harlot") is used literally in the Bible, it refers to a person who engages in sexual activity in exchange for money or other forms of payment.

2025-12-07 02:19:23 UTC

- reply

I’m curious, what extra evidence do Christians have (compared to Muslims) that their religion is the correct one?
I asked the same question of a Muslim once and got what I thought was a considered and logical response.

2025-12-06 01:31:38 UTC

- reply

Hmm, I dunno. how can we be sure that the thing is falling and it’s not just the ground moving up to meet it?🤔

2025-12-05 18:14:34 UTC

- reply

Definitely why CZ’s shoes are so yellow

2025-11-30 03:02:44 UTC

- reply

Wouldn’t training fasted be not eating before? Sounds like he’s saying you need to eat right after. The reason for this is that you need protein available to repair muscle damage and provide for hypertrophy, and, you need sugar available to replenish your muscle glycogen stores. There is plenty of literature available that shows the optimum time after exercise to provide your body with these nutrients for the best results but it’s a long time since I read anything about it. Waiting hours after exercise is not the answer though if improved performance is your goal.

2025-11-30 02:40:04 UTC

- reply

I never really thought about this before but if there is a heaven who deserves to go there more than dogs? It’s actually bummed me out a bit that if heaven is real and I go there there won’t be any dogs there.

2025-11-30 02:34:51 UTC

- reply

Isn’t the Bible the thing that tells us to believe in the Christian God? If there are different versions and they contradict each other how did you reconcile that and get to the point that you believe in God but don’t trust what’s in the bible?

2025-11-28 00:50:28 UTC

- reply

Imagine if this killed social media. If that happened the world would be a better place imo.

2025-11-27 23:45:49 UTC

- reply

I can’t imagine having a grill that needs software

2025-11-27 23:43:13 UTC

- reply

Protecting children from social media is the job of parents, not the government

2025-11-26 11:40:30 UTC

- reply

Belief does matter, the human brain is extremely powerful. We try to control for it to understand what is causing the effect.

2025-11-26 02:49:19 UTC

- reply

1) I did a bit of reading on Dr. Karim. While there does appear to be some anecdotal evidence I could not find any rigorous studies that support his hypothesis. If you know of any please share them.
2) I have an immediate family member who trained as a raiki master. They told me point blank there was no point in giving me a treatment because I did not believe that it would work. This is a significant red flag for me since if it only works because I believe then it’s psychosomatic and not, as the raiki practitioners claim, them doing something with energy.
Sorry if my differing life experiences and opposing view points are making me an asshole again.

2025-11-25 16:50:04 UTC

- reply

Dare I ask what practical purposes or will that also make me an asshole?

2025-11-25 16:33:43 UTC

- reply

Enjoyed this. Seems to have been a while since we had a mini wine lesson.

2025-11-25 16:31:00 UTC

- reply

I haven’t called you a liar or any other name for that fact.
You have called me an asshole multiple times.
I have not personally attacked you and have kept my arguments focused on your methodology. If you can’t make a distinction between the two that is a you problem and not on me.
You have attacked me personally when you didn’t like what I had to say.
I apologised for my bluntness of my initial criticisms and engaged on your terms.
I asked questions as you requested I did but wasn’t satisfied with the answers you were able to provide.
I’m simply trying to point out to you that to scientifically prove the effect you are claiming your methodology requires modification.
If you don’t care about having a defendable protocol then ignore me and carry on but anyone who understands the scientific method is going to accept your results.
Go ahead and call me an asshole again if it makes you feel better.

2025-11-25 16:15:10 UTC

- reply

“What are you isolating by this?”
Removal of the holder being able to have an influence on the results.
There is not way to scientifically prove that you had no knowledge of what the results would / should be. If this is a real effect that is not caused by any influence of the holder it will still happen in a double blind test. If you really want to know if the effect is real and not caused in any way by you holding the pendulum this is the gold standard of proving it.
“This entire conversation has been a shit show and it’s because you don’t know how to investigate something respectfully.”
I could say the same about you refusing to accept challenges to your methodology.

2025-11-25 08:20:01 UTC

- reply

No I don’t think so.
I think you’re still referring blind as meaning not knowing what outcome to expect instead of it being not knowing what is being tested.
If you did previous trials were they with and without a pyramid present where the holder had no knowledge of if the pyramid was or was not present?
I agree we were talking past each other and the concept of what a double blind protocol is is still the issue. I still do not believe that you can claim the results as valid unless it’s a double blind protocol.
Another question is does what the pyramid is made of affect the results? If we’re talking about EMF being the cause of the result I would expect the composition of the pyramid will have some effect.

2025-11-25 04:28:35 UTC

- reply

I have, as you asked, humbled myself and asked the question you wanted me to ask. I would ask you to humble yourself and accept that your methodology may not be the gold standard for proving what you are trying to.

2025-11-25 04:27:06 UTC

- reply

And as I mentioned before double blind means not knowing what is being tested, and not being unaware of what the observations should be. This is an important and critical distinction.

2025-11-25 04:25:40 UTC

- reply

Ok, but what I am trying to highlight is that as far as the scientific method is concerned you have not adequately controlled for you influencing the results.
You have seen an effect, I’m not disputing that.
If I wanted to prove that the effect is real and attributed to EMF explanation you gave I would do a double blind trial.

2025-11-25 04:19:58 UTC

- reply

I’m not being pedantic and the definition of ‘blind’.
You are presenting this as a scientific experiment. In a scientific experiment blind is as I have described it. Believing that you no not know what will be observed does not make it a blind test.
I did not invent the double blind experiment, someone far smarter than me did and if you want to show that the holder has no influence on the outcome that is what needs to be done.
Clearly you care about showing that this particular effect is real so do a proper double blind study to prove it to yourself if nothing else.

2025-11-25 04:08:46 UTC

- reply

Ok, so a true double blind experience which would be the gold standard in this case would be that neither the experimenter nor the holder have any knowledge of which pyramid is being tested.
Reading your response it appears that you think a blind trial is not knowing what the results should be before starting, am I correct in thinking that?

2025-11-25 04:05:04 UTC

- reply

What is your explanation for the effect that you are observing?

2025-11-25 04:04:00 UTC

- reply

Presumably you had some preconceived ideas that there would be an effect otherwise you would not have tested it in the first place. How did you control for that? Have you run a double blind trial with people who have no idea of what is being tested?

2025-11-25 04:00:00 UTC

- reply

How did you make the trial blind?

2025-11-25 03:50:09 UTC

- reply

Nostr, I am the asshole?
#amitheasshole
#asknostr

2025-11-25 03:46:00 UTC

- reply

What information you have that I do not have that leads you to conclude that your hand is not an uncontrolled variable and does not have any effect on the results?