spookypayment
SpookyPaymentAtADistance

Operator of lightning network node SpookyPaymentAtADistance

Public Key

npub16eesd4jpm5xjuqx6yfe2cv9p5hznfj777atxuevdvrfjm72kjpdsxs3tm2

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsdvucx6eqa6rfwqrdzyu4vxzs6t3f5e000w4nwvkxkp5edl9tfqkcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds2th8tt

Publishing to

relay.snort.social

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub16eesd4jpm5xjuqx6yfe2cv9p5hznfj777atxuevdvrfjm72kjpdsxs3tm2

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-05-22 10:20:07 UTC

- reply

I was replying to:
#nevent1q…f8ue mentioning Klaus Schwab 😅.
maybe I clicked on the wrong thread, but I find primal interface a bit misleading sometimes 😅

2026-05-22 09:24:12 UTC

- reply

unless Vinceko IS Klaus in disguise 😅

2026-05-22 09:23:12 UTC

- reply

we build channels between us for the precise purpose of being free from KS

2026-05-17 18:25:46 UTC

- reply

👀

2026-05-17 18:25:11 UTC

- reply

self custody might be a solution, but if we don't use our bitcoin (creating a bitcoin based economy) then it's dead.
however, when I spend my sats to a merchant, I'll never know if he'll stack them or sell them on an exchange for fiat.
so, no, I don't have a good idea to fight back either 😕

2026-05-14 04:10:38 UTC

- reply

GM LNBIG!
no more updates on your routing stats?

2026-05-12 11:48:20 UTC

- reply

nice site!

2026-05-11 09:40:58 UTC

- reply

https://ppq.ai/
it's not free but it is anonymous and you can pay in sats

2026-05-09 18:31:21 UTC

- reply

people only learn once they get rekt, and hopefully the Saylor "business model" cannot last forever. We just need to wait.

2026-05-09 06:01:41 UTC

- reply

I'm here because I'd like to connect with other Lightning Network node operators to exchange experiences and knowledge

2026-05-05 04:09:10 UTC

- reply

thank you mate!

2026-05-04 08:53:43 UTC

- reply

I'm still in time to accept some? 😅
030d8457f7c7f2a5d87faf538b0b85760556154b46d178a2d8fffa94b81a9cdb3f

2026-04-26 08:33:06 UTC

this morning I noticed something strange on my node:
many channels on the graph are reported with capacity = 0.
for example:
```
lncli getchaninfo 978167325659758592
{
"channel_id": "978167325659758592",
"chan_point": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000:0",
"last_update": 1777178098,
"node1_pub": "03905aed59919f322abcc107c3cb6767bc7d40ed175a9d143706fc211cad188157",
"node2_pub": "0395ab9ab6ac75949a648c5b7830ecea192c618df2fa6220154a5066878d9f439c",
"capacity": "0",
"node1_policy": {
"time_lock_delta": 100,
"min_htlc": "1000000",
"fee_base_msat": "0",
"fee_rate_milli_msat": "164",
"disabled": false,
"max_htlc_msat": "2970000000",
"last_update": 1777178098,
"custom_records": {},
"inbound_fee_base_msat": 0,
"inbound_fee_rate_milli_msat": 0
},
"node2_policy": {
"time_lock_delta": 40,
"min_htlc": "1000",
"fee_base_msat": "0",
"fee_rate_milli_msat": "100",
"disabled": false,
"max_htlc_msat": "2970000000",
"last_update": 1777178098,
"custom_records": {},
"inbound_fee_base_msat": 0,
"inbound_fee_rate_milli_msat": 0
},
"custom_records": {},
"auth_proof": null
}
```
checking it on mempool.space or amboss or similar services, the channel is a fine 3ml sats channel.
anyone else running the latest lnd (0.21.0-beta.rc1) noticed that? Should I report this as a bug or is it an issue with my own node?
#lnd #lightningnetwork

2026-04-22 12:50:39 UTC

⚡ Joint Factory — Idle Tycoon on Nostr with Lightning Lottery
Build your production chain, roll for sats and climb the leaderboard!
👉 https://jointfactory.io/r/PhDat3RV
#JointFactory #Bitcoin #Lightning #Nostr

2026-03-04 15:47:17 UTC

- reply

they should update your quote as a testimonial on their site 😅

2026-03-02 13:57:08 UTC

- reply

they're to different destinations and from different sources.
I was thinking about some kind of probing as well, but wouldn't it make more sense if it were with increasing amount rather than decreasing?
also, why repeat 10?

2026-03-02 10:23:29 UTC

lately I'm forwarding a lot of sequences of payments made like this:
10 sat
10 sat
5 sats.
Anyone has an idea of what they are?
#LightningNetwork

2025-12-30 18:53:53 UTC

- reply

look at their eyes: they're scary. I wouldn't trust this woman to take my dog out for a piss, let's figure let her decide what is information vs disinformation

2025-12-26 19:23:24 UTC

- reply

hey Dominic, no need to take it too personally and attacking back. I wasn't pointing at you directly: that was just my opinion.

2025-12-26 08:08:00 UTC

- reply

once there were mostly basic bricks and less kits.
you used your fantasy to build things.
now you have mostly expensive kits with very specific "bricks".
you buy the kit, build it (involving zero fantasy) and never destroy it because it costed a lot and the "bricks" it is made of are very specific and less reusable for other constructions

2025-12-25 06:55:29 UTC

- reply

hi! sorry to hear that. I'm force closing right now

2025-11-20 17:39:05 UTC

- reply

bottom bottom bottom!

2025-11-17 20:34:44 UTC

some friends reported that lnd v0.20.0-beta.rc4 have serious performance issues on less performant hardware.
this bug is probably the culprit:
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/10337
beware before upgrading!
#lnd #lightningnetwork #noderunner

2025-11-17 18:55:08 UTC

- reply

impressive numbers mate! 💪

2025-11-06 11:37:01 UTC

- reply

Thanks!
Nice community you have there 😄 I'm connected with 3 nodes already!

2025-11-06 08:35:53 UTC

- reply

hi @nprofile…9h6j ! nice to find you here! maybe you can answer my morning question 😅

2025-11-06 07:03:39 UTC

GM noderunners (and not!)
what's about all those LN nodes called "Corn🌽<something>"? 🤔
#noderunner #lightningnetwork

2025-11-04 17:15:13 UTC

- reply

opened! waiting for confirmations 💪🏻

2025-09-26 05:31:17 UTC

- reply

and only approved miners, to avoid that someone mine CSAM content into the timechain again

2025-07-17 06:42:57 UTC

what about those hundreds shitty "LNT" nodes that are appearing on the network?
Very small channels (20k sats) and all connecting to LNT.chengdu.
Looks suspect to me 🤔
#LightningNetwork #noderunner #bitcoin

2025-06-29 20:07:36 UTC

- reply

I guess we need a nostr obituary like the one they made for bitcoin 🙂

2025-06-15 15:12:08 UTC

- reply

good advices except the one about Firefox: the shit has become complete spyware.

2025-06-13 15:58:49 UTC

I don't like that this thing is still there...
https://www.weforum.org/organizations/lightning-labs/
https://blossom.primal.net/d6e8cfe884727e3b7907cd3d40cb4bdf9d4747ebcf7695341cedfe6bc144f0dc.png

2025-06-10 08:49:20 UTC

- reply

why not using escape backticks for code blocks? If your renderer supports it, you could also have nice syntax colouring for shell commands

2025-06-10 05:58:49 UTC

- reply

comatoshi

2025-06-08 15:22:32 UTC

after a few weeks of wild traffic on my node, today the calm is reigning.
All that I see are what appears to be (failed) attempts of rebalancing (all round amount: 50k, 100k, 250k)
Noderunners, is it the same for you?
#lightningnetwork #noderunner #bitcoin

2025-06-07 08:54:36 UTC

- reply

incredible results @nprofile…kmw9 !
In the last week I saw an huge increment in forwards but I'm still far from that target.
Working hard to get there 💪🏻!
030d8457f7c7f2a5d87faf538b0b85760556154b46d178a2d8fffa94b81a9cdb3f

2025-06-06 13:31:22 UTC

- reply

thanks for sharing the numbers!

2025-06-03 18:16:18 UTC

- reply

incredible achievement Nick!
as a small node runner I can imagine the great commitment you put into it to get to this level.
You have all my admiration 😃

2025-03-15 13:08:40 UTC

- reply

at a certain moment I was thinking the same (if I understand correctly what you said): having a channel full, being then able to forward a large payment, is something desirable and of value, so the fee should be high.
but this is counterintuitive (and possibly wrong!)