weev

Single most censored person in history, internationally notorious computer criminal, successful federal defendant-appellant, baroque countertenor enthusiast. I am censored by Web of Trust in clients that support it. Turn it off in your client settings if you expect to receive my replies or DMs.

XMR: 88ag7PcUJMSJHAr5585kzfdjxPvNXjfmBS33c9mQAs965yXRBfaF6JCC7Fw4tXRpWXUMdWDkEH6Fec127m3ozMqMR5G1PQJ

Session ID (getsession.org): 05a1470eb63c9a534b6b8f9c17b91763a288603910280fde22acf1cf7a3ebb975e please don’t use Nostr DMs, I don’t like them and want Session messages.

Public Key

npub1weev88wc43slz6jjlq2h30ltmd0ccu9utfe8wet2kkax0w6epavqw409xg

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8vukrnhv2cc03dff0s9tchl4akhuvwz795unhv44ttwn8hdvs7kqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds0s8pte

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1weev88wc43slz6jjlq2h30ltmd0ccu9utfe8wet2kkax0w6epavqw409xg

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-05 20:42:48 UTC

- reply

oh yeah I forgot the complete bullshit of their quantum claims, just absolutely charlatan and schemer behavior. The fact that they present themselves as goblinoid mutants in public should warn you of this kind of behavior in advance.

2026-07-05 19:41:20 UTC

- reply

Finally, ZCash is just not fungible. There is a difference in value for that which has been historically shielded and not. Many exchanges that list ZEC will ban you if you actually use the privacy features. So whether or not your ZCash can be used anywhere becomes, much like Bitcoin, a complicated regulatory regime that you don’t know will be used against you until your coins are frozen on some exchange somewhere because someone didn’t like the transaction history.

2026-07-05 19:37:28 UTC

- reply

A major problem with ZCash is the lack of ability to verify the supply in the Orchard. If one of the recent inflation bugs were exploited we would have no idea. Or if the trusted setup ceremony were somehow compromised, they might have been able to print an undisclosed amount of ZEC then. Someone could have printed a billion ZCash and there’s no way to tell unless they unshield it all. ZCash’s founder also said that they can make it traceable enough for law enforcement. They tweeted it in public, in fact (screenshot attached). ZCash’s people, including Zooko in the Tweet referenced, have repeatedly called themselves cypherpunks but then asked us to personally trust them institutionally with the initial bootstrapping of the coin, many questionable and complicated migrations away from that initial bootstrapping, potentially offering LEO assistance, and they all have incredibly close ties with Israel and the surveillance state. Even if I did trust them (I do not, not a single bit) humans are fallible. The idea that I am expected to accept that the supply is permanently unauditable and has not been compromised by greed or simple human error is ridiculous. I simply do not want to use the products of anyone that acts and talks like these people. Their words, their actions, and their absolutely disgusting physiognomies (additional picture attached) do not inspire confidence in me.
https://i.imgur.com/cMWJ0Oo.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/hWVnehE.jpeg

2026-07-05 18:08:46 UTC

This is the best criticism of eCash. I like Paul and his criticisms of Lightning are excellent, and drivechain is definitely a better model for scaling Bitcoin than LN, but the actual implementation seems to not have us ending up with money that “just works”. I need money that just works in the same way consistently, not a toolbox.
#nevent1q…r0g8

2026-07-05 17:52:39 UTC

- reply

if the vast majority of Bitcoin users reject my basic ability to do commerce, how can I use or promote Bitcoin? It becomes rational, at that point, to do everything I can to sabotage Bitcoin, because it has been hijacked away from Satoshi’s vision of a currency and foundation of a financial system and turned into a slavish tool against liberty by whoever has captured it.
Regardless, I do not think that large bodies of users have a say (if that were true Luke Dashjr would control a completely retarded version of Bitcoin). Bitcoin is a consensus governed by miners and Core, and so far miners have just chosen to support virtually anything and everything Core does. They have completely abdicated their role in governance. Bitcoin being fungible takes only the agreement of Core.

2026-07-05 17:41:57 UTC

- reply

There is not a way to block someone from sending you Bitcoin. Transations on the Bitcoin ledger are immutable, permissionless, and unfortunately public.
There is a fix for this — people need to lobby Bitcoin Core and have them implement proven fungibility features, of which a side effect is privacy, using ring signatures and full-chain membership proofs.
#nevent1q…klkk

2026-07-05 16:53:02 UTC

- reply

> The reason Monero rocks is because it’s essentially impossible to “use it wrong”. We don’t want privacy tools, we just want money
Thank you. I was using too many words. This is the perfect summary.

2026-07-05 14:50:23 UTC

- reply

> But bitcoin simply won't change
Bitcoin absolutely has changed. Core governs it completely by fiat and there have been some fairly large or controversial changes over the years. RBF ruined the widespread usage of zero-conf (many people have come to the conclusion that for their businesses, finalizing invoices on zero-conf was superior to using LN), SegWit increased block sizes which at one point was a controversial idea and recently the saga of OP_RETURN (which was a good and wise change on Core’s part, but many misinformed people objected). We all have our opinions on changes like these I am sure, but the point is that Core has basically done whatever they wanted, regardless of how people were actually using, planning to use, or wanted to use blockchains at the time. If Core decides they want to implement FCMP we could have it on a reasonable timeline. The idea that Bitcoin does not change is, frankly, retarded. Bitcoin has changed, and so far most of the changes have been done to accommodate things that did not see widespread usage or advance Bitcoin’s central role as currency or the cornerstone of a new global financial system.

2026-07-05 14:24:26 UTC

- reply

> because there is no magical difference between private RBTC on Rootstock, and private Monero on mainchain
how many people are using the groth16 snarks implementation on rBTC? (less a dozen people) who has audited it? (Nobody) what wallets people actually use support it? (None) beyond this, you see no theoretical difference between snarks and the FCMP++ model at all? what about legal differences? (Courts have ruled specifically against this snarks-on-VM kind of mixing and you are mixing specifically with tainted funds because it is an overt act of money laundering, while Monero focuses on fungibility, privacy is a simple side effect of that, and your funds never physically mix with tainted ones — Monero is just making it difficult to identify the actual source and destination of the UTXO).
present-day usability, underlying function, legal risk, and an actual economy maybe aren’t magical differences, depending on your definition of magical, but they are certainly critical ones. This kind of statement is completely baseless and devoid of actual thought, and is coming from someone who clearly has no interest in providing fungibility for actual users who want to use blockchains daily (e.g. more of the same shit maxis have been doing for the past decade)

2026-07-05 14:09:06 UTC

- reply

> millions of stolen USDT repeatedly get laundered through tornado cash, and no one can do anything about it
What? Nearly all of that has been aggressively frozen by Tether since.
https://stables.rip/
Tornado Cash stopped being useful when regulators took a short look at it, and Tether has since frozen literally billions of dollars of USDT. Exchanges will no longer touch any outputs related to Tornado’s contract. Tornado is a great demonstration of why a small subset of a protocol having privacy features is unsustainable, and only works as long as nobody is seriously looking. It breeds censorship.
> Monero folks begging for attention
> bitch and whine
You are literally a degenerate libtard crying in response to my thread, furious that I won’t believe in maximalism or support Bitcoin unconditionally. It is in fact maxis that are bitching and whining constantly that people are increasingly demanding that Bitcoin actually be useful money, and not a digital paperweight representing hash power.

2026-07-05 13:07:08 UTC

- reply

but there's additional hazards with this kind of opt-in privacy, in that the side chain can end up like Tornado Cash, where you are legally engaging in an overt act of money laundering by moving Bitcoin in or out of it. If fungibility is the basic property of the currency then privacy is not an overt act of laundering, privacy is a side effect of fungibility that you happen to benefit from. This also leads to situations like ZCash where they get listed on an exchange but then when you actually use the shielded addresses to have privacy, their AML controls require them to ban you from the exchange because it looks like money laundering. Reasonable fungibility only occurs when it is universal and not opt-in. The Bitcoin on the “fungible side chain” would then have a different price than the normal Bitcoin, paradoxically reducing Bitcoin’s fungibility.

2026-07-05 12:56:52 UTC

- reply

absolutely. But I still think Bitcoin needs to be fungible on the main chain, and will *never* be money if it is not so.

2026-07-05 12:47:49 UTC

- reply

that you've repeatedly justified platform censorship before makes me wonder if your insistence on Bitcoin not being fungible is rooted in a desire to see your political allies censor people using Bitcoin as they have censored people’s speech on social media services.

2026-07-05 11:48:01 UTC

- reply

1) there’s no private sidechain for Bitcoin, and it would be a significant and potentially impossible effort to move the Monero economy to it.
2) Bitcoin should be money. This was Satoshi’s vision. It is obvious that currency requires reasonable fungibility and Bitcoin does not have it (hence the success of Monero). I believe that Bitcoin should be money.
that you would respond to this with social justice sniveling about how a cabal of giant corporations have every right to blacklist me from every aspect of public life is pretty indicative of why Bitcoin is close to its final cycle.

2026-07-05 03:26:20 UTC

- reply

> Fungible isn't an all or nothing
I don’t see how it isn’t. Either a commodity is fungible or it isn’t. Bitcoin having a “fungible side chain” does not make it fungible. It literally highlights the lack of fungibility of Bitcoin. People in Monero demand fungibility. Bitcoiners refuse to offer it, and openly argue against its basic need for a currency. So many people are leaving, and thus maximalists ironically refute themselves.
> Anyways, you should sell all your bitcoin.
Probably.

2026-07-04 22:06:22 UTC

- reply

Gupax/p2pool doesn’t give merge mined chain rewards, like Tari. In fact, the p2pool operator has been submitting your proof of work to Tari for himself and selling it as an operator fee since day 1. That’s his prerogative, p2pool is an excellent service. But I want merge mining rewards, and expect my pool to give them to me.

2026-07-04 16:48:20 UTC

- reply

I personally use xmrig with the supportxmr pool

2026-07-04 14:54:25 UTC

- reply

Monero supply is 100% auditable via rangeproofs. This is a myth. You are thinking of ZCash, which has no way to audit the orchard and has had recent, present-day inflation bugs. Regardless of whether you have had success using Bitcoin, there are plenty of people that have done so that have ended up arrested, imprisoned, robbed at gunpoint, tortured, or had their access to financial services cut off for doing so. With the multitude of articles covering all of these things, “these bad things have never happened to me!” is not an argument. It is willful negligence. They’ve happened to hundreds of thousands of people at this point, collectively.

2026-07-04 11:48:20 UTC

- reply

Monero supply is 100% auditable with rangeproofs, which Bitcoin could adopt. It is only ZCash, a shitcoin controlled by a single Mossad tranny, that has had present-day inflation bugs and has no means to verify supply
An attempt to make a currency that is not fungible is an abject failure. Why atomic swap to Monero for use as a fungible currency? That only makes your Bitcoin not fungible. Why go back to Bitcoin at that point? “Store of value”? Why not store value in Monero instead?

2026-07-04 10:09:20 UTC

I was forced for many years to use Monero in daily business when I would have much rather been using Bitcoin because is has not been fungible for me, and its lack thereof has interfered in my business and life. There were many opportunities for Bitcoiners to demand Core actually address the issues that prevent the daily use of Bitcoin as money by those of us that don’t have bank accounts. They have repeatedly rejected this to instead pretend some shithole village in Latin America has adopted daily use of the Lightning Network. They, of course, have not, they simply pretended to do so for long enough that they can get free handouts of Bitcoin from drooling libertarians which they have since sold. All so that the startup grifters who pay their crypto influencer tard wranglers can convince gullible venture capitalists that a handful of retarded third worlders in favelas doing a couple custodial LN transactions is a bullish sign for Bitcoin.
Meanwhile, the chart tells the real story. Bitcoin is losing steam as a speculative asset. This is potentially the final cycle. The last chance for Bitcoiners to transmute the massive influx of institutional capital we saw from 2021-2025 into a product that actually has real utility and serves the needs of people who want to use blockchains as their main financial ledger. The last bull run was the most pathetic cycle yet, 69k to 126k top to top.
There’s been zero consideration among Bitcoiners that faith in Bitcoin’s “inevitability” has been poisonous to actual adoption, and that Bitcoin is potentially poised to permanently settle at a major loss when the lack of an additional significant ATH refutes the power log scale delusion. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Some people at the top of Bitcoin do realize that the foundational market opportunities that were missed represent existential threats to the future of Bitcoin, which is why so much accommodation was given to NFTs via Ordinals (to a complete failure, ord.io just shut down last month) and now Citrea, which is bringing EVM compatibility to Bitcoin. The problem is that these are settled markets with winners already chosen. Bitcoin is not going to be a clearinghouse for NFTs or smart contracts. Other chains that decided to implement useful features in a timely manner already won those games, and Ord’s failure shows that Bitcoin’s historical significance is not enough to attract participants when you show up many years too late.
Bitcoin has to be money, not only because it was the original vision of Satoshi, but because Bitcoiners have rejected the opportunity for the blockchain to be used for any other application in a timely manner. Every real world use of blockchain has gone to other chains, because idiotic Bitcoiners turned their nose up and sneered about “monkey jpegs” as other blockchains were garnering actual users and creating sustainably valuable fee economies. Just as it was too late for Ordinals to succeed in a settled NFT market, Citrea’s attempt to create an EVM contract market via Bitcoin is not realistic after so many entrenched alternatives.
Every business I have seen that uses Monero and Bitcoin always sees more Monero usage. People actually want to use Monero as currency. Fungibility is the primary concern of people who actually use blockchains for their daily finances. I don’t have a bank account, and I can tell you that it is my primary concern. I am using Monero because it is fungible, and I am not using Bitcoin because it makes it impossible to run a stable business. People that tell you Bitcoin is better as money aren’t even capable of being qualified to make this statement, because they always still have bank and investment accounts. They are still on the grid of the legacy financial system. Bitcoin has been relegated to something I simply hold, and I increasingly ask myself why I would continue holding it over something that I actually find useful. Other people much less ideologically aligned with Satoshi’s vision than me out there must be asking themselves the same thing.
Bitcoiners have a final opportunity to make a push to become money, but they have to abandon chasing markets they have already lost. There is only one way to save Bitcoin, and that’s for Core to create a fungible currency using Monero’s model of Full Chain Membership Proofs. I truly love Bitcoin, and I wish I could be using it on a day to day basis. But Core has consistently rejected the implementation of any feature that could make Bitcoin useful as money in a timely manner, while there is still money to be made and viable businesses to be integrated with Bitcoin. They have historically rejected any opportunity to salvage this situation.
I believe we approach the last window for Bitcoin to become money, instead of a historical marvel in the development of blockchains. Grifting off the history of Nakamato consensus for so long while trying to shove “solutions” that the market has repeatedly rejected down people’s throats has not worked. It’s time for Bitcoiners to stop scamming venture capitalists and implement what the market actually has demonstrated it wants in a currency.
https://i.imgur.com/Ttm25g7.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/E9haaYk.jpeg

2026-07-03 23:25:02 UTC

- reply

This shit is retarded Joe Rogan drug addled ramblings. Someone smoked too many things while listening to that idiot Saylor

2026-07-02 14:50:53 UTC

- reply

Okay. Maybe you can get a couple friends to make oracle accounts and have 3 free tiers, then roundrobin them through a haproxy on a $5 unlimited bw VPS in some jurisdiction that doesn’t care about abuse reports. Then you just need some kind of script to make sure that posts to any single backend relay get rebroadcast to the others. Is something like this viable?

2026-07-02 14:07:22 UTC

- reply

if 4 cpus is pushing it then reduce the total load. how about taking the list of npubs that are purple subscribers, and scraping their follows? This is now the truncated list of people that can publish to the damus relay.

2026-07-02 13:21:57 UTC

- reply

I don’t expect support and don’t keep any data I can’t afford to lose on something I don’t pay any money for, it is a scratch machine for trash

2026-07-01 19:30:52 UTC

- reply

says “failed to follow” when I follow you but no additional information

2026-07-01 18:23:34 UTC

- reply

my node ID is a07107f91dc5a920de22a1fa08df5909995a2a621f927f4a42fbb23ce9d0b6e8

2026-07-01 18:17:59 UTC

- reply

i just turned that on in the settings.
let me know if this works now.

2026-07-01 16:39:51 UTC

- reply

follow me on this shit, I’m connecting by a tor router. Let me know if things look okay

2026-07-01 16:39:06 UTC

- reply

f2d326a0de68e35c01df6f40267350c41d3c42dc62d8f53335ecfae9c652e352

2026-07-01 06:00:09 UTC

- reply

that you people, in the middle of all this, want to attack the President’s assistance is incredibly retarded. It is the only upside of this cycle. The numbers are fucking abysmal. The only good thing in Bitcoin’s defense right now is the vocal support from the fucking President! Everything else actually happening in Bitcoin is absolutely fucking embarrassing.

2026-07-01 04:30:55 UTC

- reply

the only major problem is that QUIC requires udp transport

2026-07-01 04:29:44 UTC

- reply

this is approaching excellence

2026-07-01 02:04:53 UTC

- reply

I don't see how Trump is going to stop the normal boom and bust cycles of Bitcoin given:
1) a massive mob lead by a very visible developer with several personality disorders that Core formerly willingly embraced screeching that Bitcoin is a conspiracy to distribute child porn
2) nobody is using Bitcoin organically, the fee market is a fucking ghost town, Core has been facilitating too-little-too-late crap like Ordinals (Ord just shut down last month), Runes, and now Citrea, which brings EVM compatibility to Bitcoin. The time to do NFT support was when it was a giant fad, not when it was settled and the market winners were actually chosen. Core quietly realizes that Bitcoin has missed the boat on huge market opportunities and is trying to quietly fix, after nearly a decade of only facilitating grifters working on the retarded clusterfuck that is LN rather than focusing on the features that actually would give Bitcoin utility
Right now Bitcoin’s value is entirely speculative and built entirely on convincing pensioners to hold its shitty bags. Attacking Trump over price action is stupid. He’s been incredibly good to Bitcoin.

2026-06-29 04:44:42 UTC

- reply

> Bitcoin completely destroyed that
Yes. Nakamato consensus was an important contribution that changed the world. Without question. But the world has moved on, because things more useful than Bitcoin came along and Bitcoiners no longer desired to ask what people wanted their money to do.
Tether isn’t monkey jpegs, and people are using a whole lot more of that than Bitcoin. Why do you think that is?
Monero is also not monkey jpegs. For all the markets and services that can *only* transact in crypto (e.g. criminal activity or debanked political dissidents), they are nearly exclusively using Monero. Why do you think that is?

2026-06-29 03:59:51 UTC

- reply

Solana and ETH have contracts. TRX-Tether has remittances. Monero has grey markets and political dissidents. These are the real, critical uses of blockchains. I don’t care about custodial coffee purchases with Square, and it’s not significant (this is obvious by the lack of volume in Bitcoin vs Tether).
Bitcoin has no killer app. It no longer has a defined reason to exist.

2026-06-29 03:27:17 UTC

- reply

“As long as transactions can’t be censored on the blockchain it doesn’t matter if people can’t buy or sell Bitcoin anymore.”
I have never once in my life had a dollar bill not be spendable anywhere in my entire life. I’ve had a ton of problems sending and receiving Bitcoin. The comparison is entirely theoretical and completely contrary to people’s actual experience. Monero is simply better.
You don’t understand why this makes how Bitcoins define censorship resistance a completely jerkoff nerd fantasy? Actual censorship occurs at all layers of society, and if you can be identified by your transaction history then you can be practically censored in all sorts of ways (including people showing up armed to take your Bitcoin from you).
This is why Bitcoin is not very useful as money, and all real world commerce has fled to other useful blockchains. Because everything is just Herman Hesse’s Glass Bead Game. Things only are meaningful to Bitcoiners on blockchain, and how that blockchain actually interacts in commerce and society has been determined to be completely irrelevant.

2026-06-28 22:54:54 UTC

- reply

LOL. Bitcoin is not censorship resistant at all for any practical use. That’s why dissidents use Monero. I myself became a Monero user because people who I sent and received Bitcoin from ended up getting their exchange accounts suspended after my exchange account was suspended. Bitcoin is not censorship resistant because it is not fungible. Censors don’t need to block a transaction if they can just deny everyone you trade with exchange access.
Bitcoin has lost the plot when they start talking about this shit.

2026-06-28 22:27:02 UTC

- reply

Altcoins are literally the consequence of this kind of attitude. Tether started as a Bitcoin project. If this kind of attitude had not been propagated by Core, Bitcoin could be collecting all those fees. Now Tether has over double Bitcoin’s daily volume! Most days, on TRON alone, Tether exceeds Bitcoin’s daily volume. Fucking TRON!
Bitcoin’s ossification saw *every single real world application of blockchains* flee to other, more useful chains. Back when I considered myself a hedged Bitcoin maxi, I thought the idea of Bitcoin maximalism was that all these altcoins were going to be demos of useful blockchain features which were eventually going to be Bitcoin sidechains. Now Bitcoin’s only utility is speculative (which is less fun than Solana memecoins) or convincing pension funds and useful idiots to buy Bitcoin treasuries and ETFs.

2026-06-28 22:21:37 UTC

- reply

No, the criticisms of largeblockers were correct at the time. Plus Ver was not much different from Luke, in that he is on video comparing people who issued fair criticisms of him to Antifa, which is a listed terror organization. It’s maybe not bad as claiming Core is engaged in a conspiracy to distribute child pornography, due to being somewhat less lurid, but “my opponents are the terrorists” is logically not any different than “my opponents are the pedophiles.”
“You’re better off using BCH” just brings Bitcoiners back to the initial debate against the large blockers, where they were trounced. The problem is that everyone transferred the correct and accurate refutation of large blockers into fallacious excessive support for Lightning. Just because Lightning is wrong does not mean we should now support a theoretically unlimited blocksize on the main chain.

2026-06-28 19:06:31 UTC

- reply

I’ve bought the drivechain idea. I understand you have issues with miner involved governance, and I admit that these are problems, but at the very least the planned desired drivechains for geographic scaling and zk-Snarks can be set up early on the eCash fork when there is very little miner involvement outside of really committed people.
In a way, the necessity of involving miners in governance might be good, because miners could have served as a check on the retarded and corrupt behavior of Core but have abdicated from this responsibility. So demonstrating to miners that there is potential ecosystem value in being more involved in governance is potentially a great thing.
Regardless I feel the issues are nuanced beyond my understanding. I am not certain drivechain will work! Your criticism seems potentially legitimate. I am, however, certain that Lightning is not the solution we need and it is time to de-ossify Bitcoin, specifically clear out the dysfunctional parasites suckling on the teat of venture capital who have sabotaged it, and put new people at the helm of the ship. Even if the new people completely fail at the assigned task, getting rid of the people that have so catastrophically failed and wasted so much time and wealth is a virtue in itself. Ineptitude should be punished.

2026-06-28 15:36:42 UTC

- reply

from the perspective of a normal person that doesn’t understand “per impression”, Nostr seems awful. The entire Zap economy is something like $300 a day. You can make more with a Twitter or TikTok account than the entirety of Nostr. Tipping is nonviable, especially with the complexities of Lightning. Nostr needs *institutional* capital from ad networks. Some way to connect advertisers to Nostr users, so that someone can hope to actually make a living by this. Someone needs to start a Nostr ad network.

2026-06-28 10:21:58 UTC

- reply

those people are, by and large, not using Lightning, they are using custodial wallets like Chivo and you have no proof that the majority of the transactions actually resolve on the Lightning network. When there is a custodial-to-custodial transfer, the custodians can settle up the difference however they please. It’s just a cell of fiat in a database at that point.
If any significant body of people were running their own Lightning nodes, the failure rate would be massive and it would crater the reputation. You’re not touting the Lightning network’s success here, you are touting the success of simple transaction writes to SQL databases. Those are indeed very stable and useful. But they aren’t Lightning.

2026-06-26 12:53:41 UTC

- reply

he literally spent the past year telling people the plan was to DEPORT THEM ALL and also execute the criminals. This is a complete insane shift in a single day

2026-06-26 02:32:36 UTC

- reply

can't believe people are still posting this kind of cope after being scammed by yet another boomer

2026-06-26 00:17:40 UTC

NO REFUNDS! How many political rugpulls is the UK on yet?
https://i.imgur.com/5HzipA3.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/OHb3OkT.jpeg

2026-06-24 23:27:07 UTC

- reply

kagi is actually good though

2026-06-23 18:41:17 UTC

- reply

Primal got all the capital and promotion. Multiple orders of magnitude more people got told about it. But Amethyst has all the users, indicating it has multiple orders of magnitude user retention rate. We were told repeatedly that all the centralization and custodial compromises that Primal was making (arguably against the spirit of Nostr) were for user retention. But what the market actually wanted was privacy by default like Amethyst has!
Is it any wonder that these people are from the same cliques that spent $130M trying to shove Lightning down our throats while getting Bitcoin to reject RingCT/fungibility, tokenization, and working with Tether (which now account for nearly 100% of all real world uses of blockchains?) Even if they aren’t malicious, their track record is just so catastrophically bad that I think that the only rational choice is to assume malice.

2026-06-22 22:39:14 UTC

- reply

This is the exact opposite to what most people mean when they say “separation of church and state”. That does not mean that they are like separate branches of the government. It means that the church has absolutely nothing to do with governance.

2026-06-22 17:22:47 UTC

- reply

Your claim here seems to be arguing that the more the Church lorded power and authority over government, the more separated they were from it. Which, to me, seems paradoxically nonsensical.

2026-06-22 10:18:20 UTC

- reply

Tyndale* sorry

2026-06-22 10:17:37 UTC

- reply

It was hardly separate if Henry VIII had to beg the papacy for a divorce (and be denied). Also the Church operated as a fifth column of government by encouraging its adherents to seditiously sabotage any government which it asserted did not have the divine right of kings. If it was separate it would not have delegated divine authority by implication through blessing the rule of monarchs.
The Church at that point was extremely corrupt and bound up in secular matters of governance and finance by too many means to describe outside the medium of tedious literature. While I don’t like the endless gaudy heresies which Tyndall and Luther spawned, Luther’s criticisms of the Church and their hand-rubbing friends were surely deserved and just.

2026-06-21 16:45:31 UTC

- reply

“Let’s make bitcoin less useful as money in hopes that it will deny privacy to the government!” With this attitude, Bitcoin will never be money.

2026-06-21 12:33:14 UTC

I hate society. I love citizenry. Odi et amo.

2026-06-20 09:37:56 UTC

- reply

Yes, Bcashers also attempted to hijack control of the Bitcoin network by convincing people that they could “vote” by controlling more nodes (insanely wrong, Bitcoin is defined by what chain has done the most proof of work). They whipped up discontent and tried to give a mob of ignorant social media users influence over the development pipeline. So the way knots is operating is both rhetorically and operationally familiar. Absolutely another Hearn situation, to the letter.

2026-06-19 14:33:04 UTC

- reply

and even then, I think in the age of AI your wife’s attorney will probably shortly ask Claude to look at the blockchain and replicate all of whatever ChainAnalysis has going for it.

2026-06-19 13:58:49 UTC

- reply

traditional European societies did things to women like wrap their mouths in an iron cage called the scold’s bridle or the branks. And Roman tradition held that if your wife removed her veil it was grounds for divorce.

2026-06-19 13:56:43 UTC

- reply

there is no real privacy in coinjoins if your adversary has any significant amount of resources. They are trivial to correlate. Coinjoins are only useful if your adversary isn’t powerful, like say, you are hiding your transactions from your wife or something.

2026-06-19 10:49:04 UTC

Happy Juneteenth everyone!
https://i.imgur.com/C1jFShd.jpeg

2026-06-19 10:41:16 UTC

- reply

Yeah so is everyone in this thread, I was 100% exited from fiat in 2014

2026-06-18 23:41:52 UTC

- reply

you realize it is a chromium browser right

2026-06-18 17:21:38 UTC

- reply

> has always been in good faith
screeching about nonexistent child porn is not “in good faith”. Plenty of blockchains have nonfinancial data attached to them. They don’t have child pornography problems.
Luke is a demented narcissistic sociopath.

2026-06-18 17:03:12 UTC

- reply

I think the much bigger issue is, have the shitcoiners invested so much in Luke’s enterprise because they view his disruptive behavior as bad for Bitcoin, and, by proxy, good for shitcoin?

2026-06-18 14:13:49 UTC

- reply

The one pictured in the screenshot, specifically. There’s others that sound implausible but nobody is brutally whipped by vicious child-murderers without scars. I believe that there is child sexual abuse going on and it is extremely widespread, but I don’t believe obvious lies from women. The 250k numbers is plausible and likely very accurate, and the documented quotes from law enforcement and social workers are absolutely heinous. That’s why I don’t like the introduction of spurious testimony from women. It’s now the most visible part of the inquiry, and all our enemies have to do to dunk on us is prove some skank was lying.

2026-06-18 12:34:23 UTC

- reply

No. Once again, you misunderstand the technology. Rangeproofs allow for the audit of the whole supply without knowing which address owns the coins. You can verify that there is no inflation on the Monero blockchain, right now, without any view keys or special access.
https://github.com/DangerousFreedom1984/monero_inflation_checker

2026-06-18 10:34:36 UTC

- reply

> House/car sized payments are totally fine,
You cannot show up places in the United States nations with 800k in cash to buy a house. Banks are told to immediately call the police and the cops will seize the cash. If you have a bunch of random wires from third parties going to your bank account, your bank will freeze your account. It is obviously not that simple, and huge swaths of the world are going to need access to an exchange. In the US this formula is simple. XMRUSD on Kraken. Kraken is fine with Monero in the United States because it’s not an overt act of money laundering, unlike many privacy “features” such as Tornado Cash, Coinjoins, and ZEC’s Orchard, which are a deliberate overt act to obscure the source or destination of funds. Kraken will kill your exchange account if you use those.

2026-06-18 09:24:10 UTC

- reply

> The reason the base layer needs to be transparent is we just create the fiat system again if it isn't.
This is also a myth. Monero has rangeproofs! the supply is perfectly auditable! Especially with upcoming FCMP++ — you can have theoretically perfect privacy AND supply verification!

2026-06-18 09:22:17 UTC

- reply

Exchanges actually useful to people in most countries kill accounts that they see depositing from coinjoins. Secondly, Coinjoins are also trivial to pierce. It does not provide serious privacy protections from a state adversary with resources and entire companies dedicated to analyzing coinjoins. Coinjoins are only useful if you want to pay for small things and never do something like “buy a house”, “pay rent” or “pay for your cancer treatment.”

2026-06-18 07:06:46 UTC

- reply

It’s significantly better because at least my identity is just a public key and not dependent on the domain that comes after the @.
it can get better from here, certainly. I’d like to see more clients support Tor by default like Amethyst, so I can advertise an onion node.

2026-06-18 06:56:06 UTC

- reply

> graf has a name and a face and he lives in trudeau's canada.
Okay fine. But he was falsely advertising that he was running a “free speech” instance. If the asterisk on that is “according to Canadian law” he should not be doing that. It’s completely fraudulent.

2026-06-18 06:53:17 UTC

- reply

I believe the heinous quotes from police and social workers in the report are real. But I do not believe the depraved hookers they quote and I think it is absolutely a grave strategic error, because these bitches are fucking lying and eventually this shit is going to be ridiculed and hurt the anti-immigration movement like the Satanic Panic shit did to the idea that elite pedophiles run society. The testimony is bullshit and all someone has to do is be like "this young woman was hung up by her feet and brutally whipped? I'm sure she has scars and extensive medical corroboration of this, correct?" and the whole thing collapses. Or some other bitches get a payoff to recant. They can also potentially drag these sluts to court over this shit under hate speech laws to make a real public spectacle of proving them liars.
The Trumpian way to confront this is just to be like "they're not sending their best. they're sending rapists, drug dealers. these people add no value to our society and abuse welfare." I mean we know how this shit works when it works. You can call them rapists, which they obviously are, without submitting lurid and obviously false claims of vicious sadomasochism next to insane claims of children being burnt to death in dog cages to the federal register. You don't need to risk your credibility doing that, because the situation is bad enough as it is. I think this shit is a misstep, and lowers my opinion of Restore.

2026-06-17 13:00:55 UTC

- reply

This proves the system works without Luke. He claimed Bitcoin blockchain would be so overrun with retarded NFTs that it would obstruct Bitcoin’s ability to function as a financial ledger. In reality, the market opportunity had long passed and there was no interest for this on the blockchain. There was actually no retail market for NFTs on Bitcoin and his alarmist claims were proven completely false. Fees have stayed rock bottom throughout (because people like to use blockchains that are actually useful for real commerce).

2026-06-17 12:50:29 UTC

- reply

> Ljerkoffa retarded jerkoff who made
Luke is a retarded jerkoff who made
sorry, typo lol

2026-06-17 12:49:21 UTC

- reply

Tether started on Bitcoin. In 2011 Dan Kaminsky embedded a memorial portrait of Len Sassaman into the Bitcoin blockchain. Anyone who has ever parsed the Bitcoin blockchain knows that it is full of non-financial data. You are a newfag. Luke is not doing shit except tricking idiots like you, and OP_RETURN was one of the few recent decisions Core made that was actually fine and not a big deal at all. Ljerkoffa retarded jerkoff who made resistance to Core’s malfeasance associated with low-IQ morons who clearly do not know anything about Bitcoin, have no technical acumen, and are vulnerable to manipulation by random idiots on Twitter saying things that sound good.

2026-06-17 12:35:41 UTC

- reply

Not BS. Luke got completely owned and lost all his coin and has been caremad ever since. Not learning a single lesson from being completely owned, he subsequently hosted the Knots project on a box he already knew had been hacked, which he had never rebuilt or reimaged. For something as serious as Bitcoin, you don’t even want to keep a machine that has been owned physically present. Because a million nasty things can be stuck in places that are hard to clean, like BIOS firmware. Any critical infrastructure if you have serious crypto is basic. Box gets owned? You build a brand new box from scratch and sell the old one on eBay.
I’m sorry, Luke is not a serious person and it is knot a serious project.

2026-06-17 12:30:14 UTC

- reply

Luke is a retarded kook and even worse than Core, just functionally less dangerous because he is a marginalized idiot capable of damaging less.

2026-06-17 11:19:50 UTC

- reply

Furthermore, the propagation of this kind of salacious BDSM erotica that the women inventing it are doubtless rubbing one out to will eventually be exploited by enemies of deportation efforts, because it is trivial to debunk this kind of ridiculous rape accusation. They lose to juries of their peers *every time*. Nobody believes this kind of shit. I appreciate what Restore is trying to do, but they need to look to the playbook of Donald Trump, who is presently carrying out the most aggressive deportation and denaturalization regime of any white country within anyone’s lifetime. And he did not accomplish this feat by elevating the claims of childless prostitutes to the national debate stage. This is not the way to success.

2026-06-17 11:07:29 UTC

- reply

No offense, I hate wogs and whatever, but this read’s like the Rolling Stone “Jackie” rape accusation, in which the accuser claimed she was kicked into a glass table which broke and yet claimed that the scars all healed without any surgical intervention. Or Amber Heard, who wrote in court filings that Johnny Depp “threw her through a ping-pong table, choked her and wrote messages in blood and oil on the walls before being hospitalized” — going even further than Rolling Stone’s Jackie, claiming that he further sadistically mocked her by writing obscene and misogynistic messages in blood on the walls after doing so, then gloated over her shrapnel-ridden carcass about how untouchable he was by the law and society due to playing a pirate in a movie. Of course, no material evidence to back up these extraordinary claims. Yet another hooker upset she wasn’t paid enough here, claiming she was hung upside down and whipped, but she isn’t out showing her scars from this whipping? Despite the claims that these are rough macheaths willing to stab a child for backtalk, they whipped her so gently as a child that she didn’t have any scars to show for it? I don’t believe it. As much as I want to affirm these accounts simply because they align with my racial and migration politics, I can’t suspend disbelief long enough to do so. This woman is obviously one of many girls who give up their chastity to wogs willingly, fucks hundreds of destitute brownoids because she hates her father and countrymen, and then cries rape and abuse when she realizes she got herself a bad deal and is no longer young or beautiful enough to garner male attention. I want every wog out from every white country, but I am unwilling to submit myself to this kind of BELIEVE WOMEN gynocracy.
https://i.imgur.com/0uoRJpd.jpeg

2026-06-17 08:13:11 UTC

- reply

He got a single mean letter from the usual suspects over me and decided to ban immediately, there’s your typical “free speech” service

2026-06-17 01:25:48 UTC

Every aspect of Bitcoin is a giant grift. Luke Dashjr makes 750k/year running a mining operation but asks for donations from retards he convinces he is saving from Core’s malice. This is perhaps slightly less or more tawdry than Core, who are helping their allies fleece venture capital funds building useless “enhancements” to Bitcoin which will never see widespread use. Luke is more predatory because he is fleecing well-meaning people with far less money, but perhaps better because he is fleecing retards who weren’t ever going to be critical for Bitcoin’s future. Core and their allies are fleecing people with more money but burnt through most of the investment capital and goodwill of people that were actually willing to commit serious capital towards advancing Bitcoin as a cause. I’d say between the two the scale of the crimes of the Core/LN crowd are much greater. For its “developers” Bitcoin is just a means for everyone to find an audience of gullible patrons to separate from their wealth.
https://i.imgur.com/r1onuw1.jpeg

2026-06-16 21:45:40 UTC

- reply

I get kicked out of everything.

2026-06-15 19:37:47 UTC

- reply

Much less than 20% of LN transactions are self-custodial on both ends. It’s less than 2%. You’re an order of magnitude off.
At that point you’re basically shilling for a less usable PayPal.

2026-06-15 17:31:44 UTC

- reply

I’m correctly identifying that the daily volume of Tether on Tron alone is greater than the daily volume of Bitcoin. I’m not encouraging people to use tether. I have never once used Tether. I don’t accept Tether. I have only an XMR address on my profile and only use XMR. But Tether started on Bitcoin! It was originally a Bitcoin project! Bitcoin should be collecting those fees! And Core refused to make any accommodations for it, instead focusing on LN. Today all those fees related to Tether transactions are going to other, more useful blockchains. There’s 23.7 times the number of Bitcoin locked up in WBTC than in LN channels, after a whole decade of LN! The real world market has spoken clearly, nobody wants what you are pushing.

2026-06-15 17:23:27 UTC

- reply

you're coping so hard because Bitcoin has let literally every actual real world application of blockchains go to other chains. Bitcoin is just a bunch of bag holders looking for a greater fool, while XMR, SOL, ETH, and TRX are the place people are doing actual commerce. I wish this wasn’t the case, and useful idiots like you had not sabotaged the chance for Satoshi’s vision of a financial system based on Bitcoin to emerge. But it is what it is. The fantastic success of altcoins is the fault of Core/LN shills, who chased everyone doing real world applications for blockchains away.

2026-06-15 13:45:38 UTC

- reply

Nigga I don’t use email post a fucking Monero address

2026-06-14 18:28:42 UTC

- reply

If you have to not suck at channel management, lightning is worthless as a protocol. If to use it in self-custody you need to be have exceptional knowledge and competence, it is worthless as a protocol. And I highly suspect the people that “don’t suck” at Lightning channel and liduitity management have never actually run it in an adversarial environment where people are willing to spend resources to target them. It’s Herman Hesse’s Glass Bead Game.

2026-06-14 18:03:09 UTC

- reply

> The point is that I and others have the option to self custody
Only because nobody is using Lightning. There is not enough bytes on the L1 to accommodate any significant number of people doing self-custody with their own node and channels. The vision of LN is a future where everyone is using a shitcoin called Cashu or Lightning that can be rugpulled at any given moment and only a handful of people can afford to do an immutable transaction on the blockchain. The only reason you can self-custody is that Lightning is a ghost town, and the number of Lightning channels open is extremely small. There’s over an order of magnitude more Bitcoin in WBTC, for example.

2026-06-14 17:55:52 UTC

- reply

> Tether is not resistant to surveillance and seizure
And neither is Lightning, which is populated largely by people using similarly custodial services. The only difference is that people are actually using Tether. I’m not saying people should use Tether to do commerce, but the market has judged it significantly more useful than Lightning for that. I don’t understand how you continually do not understand this point. I can only assume that you are willfully pretending you do not understand, because the ungenerous assumption is that you are retarded.

2026-06-14 09:47:01 UTC

- reply

massive amounts of commerce in USDT. Bitcoin is mostly just speculators, ETFs and cultists now. Drastically smaller amounts of commerce are happening in Bitcoin right now. And that’s because Core has continually focused on Lightning rather than the things people actually use blockchains for.

2026-06-14 09:45:17 UTC

- reply

this is pure autistic lack of theory of mind and solipsism. “I run a noncustodial wallet with my own lightning node, so everyone else must be too”. Those Square vendors you lauded are not running their own Lightning node. That’s the majority of retail location Bitcoin vendors in the world and they are using a custodial solution. Lightning has nobody but very fringe nerds who are not doing business in adversarial conditions running a node.
That’s not shifting the goalpost. Tether started off on Bitcoin, had Core focused on actual real world use cases of blockchains instead of Lightning, it would be generating massive amounts of fees and countless users for Bitcoin rather than a dozen other blockchains. That Tron is the major beneficiary of Tether is a giant L for Bitcoin. People are doing

2026-06-14 00:35:22 UTC

- reply

No, custodial services process 1B a month. You have no knowledge that any of that traffic goes over the Lightning network at all. They can settle up however they please!

2026-06-13 21:40:59 UTC

You can say something like this but you don't see how this is why Lightning is so full of problems? I’ve been told to use BOLT12 by multiple people if I don’t want a centralized LNurl and want privacy! You’re the first Lightning guy that has told me it is bad. Lightning is always bad because I’m not using the right Lightning rail! But then someone else has a thing that they say is the actual solution, and usually it has its own problems. It’s like using Linux desktop software in 1991. You’re always just using the wrong thing, and after listening to yet another fat GNUbeard tell you that you need to switch to X and then back to Y but correctly configure it and then try Z and you just want something that works as easily as everyone else, and you end up just saying fuck it and getting an Indigo or a Sparc because what you need works on it and your time has value. In this instance, the equivalent of a Tezro for me is called “Monero” and it has been battle tested among dissidents and grey markets. Lightning has failed to capture all of these users. People want to spend Monero.
#nevent1q…vecw

2026-06-13 21:22:57 UTC

- reply

Monero has a greater mix set than BOLT12.

2026-06-13 21:00:42 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin is also cuck bucks at this point.
I said “used exclusively” just because some coffee shop can theoretically accept bitcoin because of their payment rail supports does not mean it is a Bitcoiner starting a business. Nor does it indicate that they are actually doing any significant amount of business in Bitcoin. You are, as usual for Coreshills, continually shifting the goalposts.
Grey markets are using Monero nearly exclusively.

2026-06-13 20:58:06 UTC

- reply

> A. Rich enough to fund a dev team
LN has been funded to the tune of about $130M and it is still a ghost town that nobody wants to use. All the functional apps are custodial.

2026-06-13 19:33:19 UTC

- reply

regardless just “use monero” seems like an orders of magnitude improvement in simplicity and platform support on this stuff. And CLINK cannot have serious privacy, because there is no perfect forward secrecy on Nostr messages and LN’s mix protocols are a joke (a custom onion routing protocol with no traffic are trivial to autocorrelate) CLINK is very cool, it is the *best lightning implementation* but that’s still like being the smartest kid on the short bus to me.
Nothing is going to make this stuff useful money. I do not want to deal with running a node, managing channels, getting liquidity, deal with all the ways someone who doesn’t like me can fuck over my lightning node and cost me money. I just am unsure I want to deal with any of this.

2026-06-13 19:29:16 UTC

- reply

I do not want a phone app or a PWA. I want something I can run in a terminal, ideally. I do not want to introduce the complexity of a web browser or entire mobile platform into my payment processing.

2026-06-13 16:33:53 UTC

- reply

This is the typical Bitcoiner attitude though. If you start asking for decentralization and noncustodial services, they attack you and call you a crybaby and a whiner. Hence Bitcoin not being a cypherpunk effort anymore. It’s a bunch of people who just want banks and regulators to control financial transactions, and people who want to enable scams.
It’s hilarious that you would say shitcoiners lose everything. There’s far more actual commerce happening amongst shitcoiners than Bitcoiners now. The daily volume of TRX-USDT exceeds the daily volume of Bitcoin, because Bitcoiners are not doing anything except jerking off and trying to unload their shit bags on people’s pension funds.

2026-06-13 16:31:33 UTC

- reply

> Bitcoiners for all their flaws at least mint new guys and businesses that actually get it and stay for the long haul
There’s far more businesses that use exclusively Monero than exclusively Bitcoin. That’s just not true.

2026-06-13 13:09:51 UTC

- reply

I’ve onboarded a ton of people to crypto, as I ran large websites that did business only in it. You can google me. I was, at one point, a party to 3% of all XMR transactions. I have been crypto-only, no fiat, since 2014.

2026-06-13 12:49:55 UTC

- reply

I'm also not telling people to give up their bank accounts. I’m just wanting people to not interfere with making Bitcoin money, and to attack the scammers which are preventing Bitcoin from becoming money. And also attack people making other centralized, custodial style services that are not financial.