>you actually *can* just make your own government and exercise great discretion at every point that matters
which means your point is now:
>stop complaining and write something better than systemd
why should i? just upthread, we've listed at least five different init systems that i can guarantee are architecturally superior to systemd in every concievable way, to wit runit, dinit, openrc, s6, and sinit. i'll even give you another bonus one: shepherd.
and you can and always have been able to have a massive superset of systemd's alleged "features" by:
- using existing tools that play nice with each other and everything else because they aren't designed for vendor lock-in
- writing your own tools
>but then why did people adopt systemd?
why won't they un-adopt it, given better solutions are available now? axiomatically derive from first principles why, if i were designing a new distro from scratch, i should use systemd instead of s6 or openrc. presumably there's no reason, so why not simply remove systemd and replace it with these objectively better solutions?
answer: that takes effort. people don't just do stuff like a random walk through the space of all possible life choices, they do what they value. that value typically lies in enjoying good times and cold beers with friends. the only way to change that is by offering them money to do what you want. red hat had money and funded the adoption of its inferior technologies to the exclusion of the pre-existing superior technologies. we aren't doing the inverse.
there are schizo autist exceptions like xlibre, which is actually highly instructive. it is objectively superior not only to wayland but also to xorg, but it isn't supported by major distros and major wms are increasingly *actively spending effort removing x11 session support* not because they're flaming fucking retards but because enrico wiegelt did not gild their marble palaces and somebody else did.
want to know where else we're getting our asses kicked where you can, likewise, make your own government? culture, especially video game development. nobody is playing libre video games. every video game anybody (reasonably neurotypical) hears about is filled to the brim with trannies and niggers. why is this? why did anita sarkeesian win? because anita sarkeesian courted capital and by extension the u.n., while we were busy doing exactly what you recommend and getting our hands dirty. chudware is and will forever remain obscure until the ocean tints red in global war and each and every one of these parasites is driven before the blinding light of the sun and flain to the bone.
