it sounds a little like she did file certain things and they just threw them all out with "what you filed is all nonsense".
Of course, I don't know what she filed - and maybe it was all nonsense. But I guess what I'm asking is, if you assume the opposite of your prior statement, that there **is** some secret rulebook and they count on nobody being aware of it, wouldn't throwing out all the filings and in-court comments as "we don't know what those things are" be exactly the move to make to insure that the secret playbook stays secret and doesn't rise to the level of being noticeable by onlookers?
I realize there are some logical problems with that line of reasoning, but maybe you'll answer it anyway?
