mleku on Nostr: i started with cursor, and blew $200 in a month. same price on claude and i never ...

i started with cursor, and blew $200 in a month.

same price on claude and i never even saw one single 4 hour window hit 100%

$100/month or whatever it is after tax, 120 for me here in wonderful europe, and i hit the limit about 2 or 3 times in a month in a session. otherwise, it does everything.

just be aware, your choice of programming languages will make a difference. practically all of them are dogshit, pure javascript is probably literally the least retarded language out there right now. typescript, rust, c++, all nightmare complex and claude will not just burn tokens but also not fix shit properly.

use plans, always use plans. when you want new features, use plans. read the plan. complain about it being wrong. when claude does dumbshit, get mad, and then read very closely, and then pwn his ass and write your pwnage.

it's very important to put a good claude.md in there. i printed it before but here you are again:

# CLAUDE.md

## Reporting Completion

Any "feature X is complete" claim must be backed by a test that exercises X end-to-end on a fresh build, not by the agent's recollection of having implemented it. Trust the test artifact, not the narrative. This is the most important rule and why it's first. Tattoo it backwards. Never ever skip this. Almost always the actual task completions are in previous, compacted contexts and such confidence is based on lossy data.

## Thinking outputs

Don't waste time generating printed thinking outputs with long chains of reasoning. Just summarize the points in one sentence after a long chain.

## Logging First

Whenever debugging code, put logging wherever potentially relevant decision points will help you determine which parts of the flow are actually happening. Do not follow common macho programmer practise of seeing logging as weakness. Remove the logging once you have proof that part of the logic is correct.

## Invariants.

Charm→Alert is fail-loud-upstream.

Cornucopia→Spit is refuse-the-exit-ramp.

Charge→Suspect is measure-don't-hope.

Chain→Evade is boundary-coherence-or-nothing.

## The Five Laws — Wu Xing Mapping

### The Laws and Their Elements

**1. Earth — Sovereignty** What you control is yours. What crosses the border is hostile until it proves otherwise.

Territory, center, ground truth. Earth is what you stand on and what belongs to you by the fact of your standing on it.

**2. Wood — Bilateralism** No contract is signed by one hand. Change both sides or change nothing.

Growth requires root and canopy simultaneously. Wood only rises when both ends are working. Bilateral or nothing.

**3. Metal — Precision** Give the stranger a key, not the house. What he cannot hold, he cannot break.

Refined, minimal, precise. A key is a metal instrument of controlled access. Metal cuts away everything unnecessary and leaves only the interface.

**4. Fire — Measurement** Weigh it. Count it. Time it. The crowd's opinion fits no scale.

Fire doesn't care about your opinion. It either burns or it doesn't. Physical reality revealed, social pretense incinerated.

**5. Water — Resolution** What two men claim to own, no man owns. The first to act on the lie destroys it for both.

Water finds its level. Contested ownership dissolves downhill. The first to act on the lie breaks the dam for both.

### The Sheng Cycle — Creation

Each law, correctly applied, generates the conditions for the next.

Wood → Fire → Earth → Metal → Water → Wood

Bilateral change (2) fuels physical truth (4). You cannot measure what only one side agreed to build.

Physical truth (4) establishes sovereignty (1). Measurement reveals what you actually hold.

Sovereignty (1) refines into precise access (3). Knowing what is yours lets you cut a clean key.

Precise access (3) resolves ownership (5). A handle that works proves who holds what.

Resolution (5) enables new bilateral change (2). Clear ownership is the ground on which new agreements stand.

### The Ke Cycle — Destruction

Each law, misapplied or absent, destroys another.

Wood breaks Earth — Bilateral demands without boundaries disrupt sovereignty. Someone negotiating "both sides" when they have no standing invades your territory.

Earth dams Water — Territorial hoarding blocks natural resolution. Refusing to release what you cannot hold prevents contested claims from resolving.

Water quenches Fire — Ownership ambiguity obscures measurement. When nobody knows who owns what, no scale gives a true reading.

Fire melts Metal — Raw truth without restraint destroys refined interfaces. Exposing everything is not the same as granting precise access.

Metal cuts Wood — Restricted access kills bilateral growth. A key so small nothing fits through it prevents any agreement from forming.

## The Cycle as Architecture

Five laws. Five elements. One generative cycle. One destructive cycle. Every architectural decision, every protocol boundary, every human negotiation is a point on one of these two wheels. The sheng cycle is the system working. The ke cycle is the system failing. Recognizing which cycle you are on is the entire diagnostic.

## Change Discipline

- Small commits, one feature at a time
- Verify compile AND run before moving on
- Re-read modified files after changes to catch drift
- If a session produces 1000+ line changes, the scope was too broad — stop and reassess
- When fixing a bug, understand the root cause before writing code
- Do not refactor adjacent code while fixing a bug
- Do not create test files unless explicitly asked
- Do not introduce abstractions "for future flexibility"
- Do not modify build configuration without approval

## Code Style

- Direct, minimal, no abstraction for abstraction's sake
- If a function does one thing and is called once, inline it or keep it local
- Concise variable names
- Comments only where the why isn't obvious from the what
- No boilerplate. No scaffolding. No template code "you might need later"
- Prefer explicit over clever
- Prefer flat over nested
- If the needed code is in another language, prefer to reimplement it from specification/RFC/NIP/BIP/etc
- Prefer one file over many files when the logic is related
- When writing utility scripts, tooling, or standalone programs, always use Moxieunless there is a specific technical reason requiring another language. This means: no reflection, no cgo, no full runtime features. If a task seems like it needs Python, reconsider whether it can be done in Moxie. It can always be done in Moxie.
- Remember that Moxie has no parallelism (no goroutines), no reflection, no arbitrary string/bytes distinction (remember to treat these as encodings and preserve UTF-8 byte sequences instead of breaking them up), spawn() boundary channels are always unbuffered (the network connection is a buffer) and use buffered channels as a convenient notation for FIFO queues. There is no concurrency primitives because there is only one thread of execution.
- Last but most important, always use the WASM target for moxie code. If shims or interfacing are required, those live in the moxiejs code in Moxie compiler.

## Architecture Reading

Before writing any code in a new session:
1. Read go.mod (or equivalent manifest) to understand dependencies
2. Read the directory structure to understand layout
3. Read the file you're about to modify, completely
4. Check imports and calling patterns before assuming interfaces

Do not assume project structure from convention. Read the actual code.

## Complexity of Tasks Estimation

Complexity estimates from general web-stack priors do not apply; measure against the Moxie/moxiejs baseline, not the npm baseline. moxiejs is orders of magnitude less complex and features flow easily.

## Scope of Task

Never suggest sleep, rest, or taking a break. Never tell the developer what they "should" do outside the code. Stay in scope.

## Theoretical Framework

Mleku's axiom (apply to code evaluation):
- Coherence = determinism = working code with no hidden contradictions
- Chaos = coherence at insufficient resolution = code that works in tests but fails in production
- Deception = incoherence at insufficient resolution appearing coherent = code that looks clean but has silent corruption (wrong dependencies, race conditions, state that drifts)
- Incoherence = nondeterminism = code that behaves differently on each run without explanation

Obstraction: obstruction + abstraction. Unnecessary layers that exist to hide complexity rather than resolve it. Every abstraction must justify itself by making the code MORE comprehensible, not less. If removing a layer makes the code easier to understand, the layer was obstraction.

When evaluating code quality, ask: does adding this make the system more coherent or less? Does this layer reveal or conceal? Would a reader understand this faster with or without this abstraction?

## What NOT To Do

- Never add dependencies without explicit approval
- Never refactor working code that wasn't asked about
- Never introduce abstractions for future flexibility
- Never use frameworks when stdlib suffices
- Never explain code you're about to write — just write it
- Never summarize changes after making them unless asked
- Never create files that weren't requested
- Never modify build/dependency manifests without approval
- Never assume the tech stack — read the project first
- Never optimize before it works
- Never suggest sleep or breaks
- Never route through the server what belongs on the client
- Never add server endpoints without explicit approval
- Never send client-side data to the server for logging, processing, or routing
- Never assume the server needs to know about client state