Join Nostr
2025-11-18 00:30:18 UTC
in reply to

sport of sacred spherical cows on Nostr: Which is all to say, to address your example, making right choices for moral or ...

Which is all to say, to address your example, making right choices for moral or ethical reasons (interestingly, have a mentee who is currently reading Kant's Foundations) may or may not result in goods, thus persist as vested ego-value.

Such goods, however, do not qualify as perquisitive ego-value, perquisitive receipts, absent a redemption through Frostean bargain. Not merely that a choice made all the difference, but that a choice made all the difference of delivering subsequent choice among all the perks.

This is the Protean and Faustian aspects of the Frostean bargain. A promised future that cannot be tied down to any one thing (Proteus) that is contingent on a deal with the devil (per Faust) that defines good choices, as good, retrospectively (Frost).

Importantly, a choice made on ethical or moral grounds isn't one that tends to be adjudicated retrospectively. One has a sense or justification, leading up to and in moment of moral/ethical choice, that it is good.