weev on Nostr: > Bro, rule 1 of white-hat hacking is to get consent from those affected before ...

> Bro, rule 1 of white-hat hacking is to get consent from those affected before accessing their devices or data,

Fuck off. If a corporation publishes something on the open Internet, I have the right as an American to access that published resource and comment on it. That's my fucking First Amendment right. I don't have to get consent for SHIT when you put it on the open Internet.

> rule 2 is to disclose that data responsibly

I gave a sample of the data to a *single journalist* to verify the claims, which Apple was trying to bury. I think that's responsible. If you don't, then fuck off, because it's up to me to decide what's responsible, not armchair commentators. Because that's my First Amendment right. I was well within my Constitutional rights to republish the whole dataset, as it contained nothing that could be argued to be private information.

> you threw that defense away on day one.

I did not. AT&T, the alleged victim, agreed that I was acting lawfully. So did Harvard's Berkman center, Stanford, the Mozilla Foundation, etc.

I seriously hope you and your whole family are raped and killed by niggers. Copsuckers like you deserve everything the neo-Bolshevik machine is planning to throw at you. "Rules of white hat hacking" EAT SHIT EAT SHIT EAT SHIT AND DIE