... and SatoshiSound (npub1sy7…2srx)
On the protocol side of things maybe. I'm not sure if Satlantis is going to be as open as you think as the whole article is not very explicit about this.
Just three quotes and how they ring to me:
> with Nostr, it’s actually possible, for the first time — in a privacy and sovereignty preserving way.
Nostr is very transparent but that is changing. Follows and therefore the social graph is public for now but private follows are a thing already I think and many want to push for more privacy in nostr, so it might be a fading advantage.
> In the same way, value will NOT accrue to the protocol because It’s not supposed to — protocols are more of a commodity. The money is and should be made by those who leverage the protocols for end-user products, apps & services.
Is Satlantis about harnessing the social graph while keeping its user data in a silo or are they working on reviews being public nostr events? Making money will require some exclusivity of something or else, alternative clients will crop up and undercut you. Or what would Satlantis be selling?
> Instead of just “liking” a review, you can tip (zap) it.
This on the other hand sounds clearly like reviews being nostr events.
Leo Wandersleb
npub1gm…78rf6
2024-08-22 22:51:16
in reply to nevent1q…2396
Author Public Key
npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6Published at
2024-08-22 22:51:16Event JSON
{
"id": "ae870aeba24a9e8499dba3ad4b5cddeeb09a7bff213fde639c60683a56377a69",
"pubkey": "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
"created_at": 1724367076,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0d4980bf542bcfdc1b4927786335ab4662a367b7bd0fb31754e1c46999c0a927",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev/",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9246c440cdc16ac6fc7f9d9fc61abe90ce460b960aaaf6fd2f10823db80eafc7",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c1deeda422c79b645ee58d8cb1b839a21a25926c9d94c21628ce8e2d89c3dbc8",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"813cf5bbaf675abb1ef2869cb55f69809bc93eab778f8c42365ec65e14bb4ec1",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "... and nostr:npub1sy70twa0vadtk8hjs6wt2hmfszduj04tw78ccs3ktmr9u99mfmqsj62srx \n\nOn the protocol side of things maybe. I'm not sure if Satlantis is going to be as open as you think as the whole article is not very explicit about this.\n\nJust three quotes and how they ring to me:\n\n\u003e with Nostr, it’s actually possible, for the first time — in a privacy and sovereignty preserving way.\n\nNostr is very transparent but that is changing. Follows and therefore the social graph is public for now but private follows are a thing already I think and many want to push for more privacy in nostr, so it might be a fading advantage.\n\n\u003e In the same way, value will NOT accrue to the protocol because It’s not supposed to — protocols are more of a commodity. The money is and should be made by those who leverage the protocols for end-user products, apps \u0026 services.\n\nIs Satlantis about harnessing the social graph while keeping its user data in a silo or are they working on reviews being public nostr events? Making money will require some exclusivity of something or else, alternative clients will crop up and undercut you. Or what would Satlantis be selling?\n\n\u003e Instead of just “liking” a review, you can tip (zap) it.\n\nThis on the other hand sounds clearly like reviews being nostr events.",
"sig": "e266f260975ccc7e1caf3731da9e74962b58b7a2cbe2c9a25dae218b9ba96426c4d03455424fa8752f01710bf3497eb75a25fad4d570c0fced62c205eae2f415"
}