Wal-Mart Birds Shaman

:nod: Humor me if you would for only this one longer comment.
It's true that he was a gatekeeper against all of our points. It's true he started saying some testing-the-reservation-line bits only before the very end.
I don't discount the very real possibility (not that this is what you are saying, only what I've read from others) that Kirk only started to "speak against" (ask questions aloud about) Israel in the last few months as a goy servant still, a faithful guardrail losing control but trying to not let the conversation run too far away. Or it may be that he actually thought he could ask questions and had only a dim spark of late realization/acceptance that it's moral to question them, in the position he was in. Neither of these possibilities nor others is necessary for nor determines the momentum I'm trying to point out.
I just see him being raised as a martyr by the conservative(TM) Right, the settling in the mind of that mass that *something* needs to be done by "our leaders" to "handle this faction, the Left, that we can now see we can't have discourse with."
That mass that last week cared more about "muh Constitution," " *law* and order," today cares more about order--and they just want "things to be handled."
I see them applauding measures that "would have caught the killer."
Patriot Act applause stuff.
I'd rather curb some of that martyrdom our way, in their eyes. Make it less wieldy as propaganda. Make him a White martyr. It's a small window, but--at least in my life--the conservatives and even "moderates" are having a moment where they're more open, if only by their shock.
I may be wrong about that. Or I could be right but too optimistic on attainable outcome. It's just there--a tool (or a bat to be raised against us, if left alone) that I see.

2025-09-12 02:24:16 UTC

Regardless of wherever you stand on whether Charlie Kirk is (post-humously) useful--as a martyr for you and yours--the conservatard and lolbert normies are angry.
That anger is being diverted to "the Left."
Guess who's on "the Left."
YOU are, you Nazi. The "Woke Right."
If you do not deign yourself worth the suffering to spare a word to your irl conservatard about WHO Charlie Kirk is a martyr for (Whites--not conservatives, not Republicans, not Americans), if you do not SHAPE the idea, then that huge base that is our closest retarded cousin will only have the one drum that is already against you; that is already rallying them.
Will they, the normie, do anything themselves? No. That's not what they're being drummed for.
They will simply not be a "muh Constitution" obstacle requiring excuse from their leaders anymore for any implemented "prevention" their "based, righteous Patriot" above takes.
Just some words. Despite the pain they've been.

2025-09-11 14:56:27 UTC

>Charlie Kirk paraded in circles as being killed "by the Left" for "being [X]" [depends on circle--Christian, Republican, conservative, etc.]
You know his death will be used to push something harmful to you, or at best used to rally and entrench lolberts and conservatards in their ineffective stances.
He WILL be a martyr FOR SOMETHING. Who/what will claim him?
You spend your energy declaring he wasn't what you are, not a Real One(TM).
Only a real road will be taken by you--only a road made of the bones of someone just like you. You have no use you can think of with regard to this road.
Guess we'll just let the conservatives, in their vulnerable and primed moment of reconsidering reality, be swept away by their masters' propaganda that Charlie's death will be made useful for then, rather than pump our own.
We should claim Charlie as a White martyr, assassinated after floating the idea of jewish influence--even control--of the Left, just one too many times this year.
Just a seed.
Give yourselves something. Take it.
or die "real"
https://media.nicecrew.digital/64/60/d7/6460d761eb0a1da092e4506037d91f08fdeebc88d0b920ab4fd4274e1161b815.jpeg

2025-08-23 04:40:39 UTC

My dad sabotages the good days he could have with me, for his relentless, room-deaf, deaf-to-son, whine-hammering--just endless boomer takes--about my having "just not wanted it hard enough" and my having not yet tried the angle of "just not letting them tell you no"--just this inability to not let a half hour pass in peace without getting back on his hands-over-eyes carousel, shifting his heels, never really staking a premise to lose, nor letting there be room for any other moments, other memories.
Have fun on your cruises out there, I guess, man.
I'll see you between them. I'll keep visiting--for *these* moments, I guess.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/65/a4/88/65a4880d261ba4217628c6e5e5690a2d678a3d6013334f4144b050ede944d4ae.png

2025-08-20 14:13:12 UTC

- reply

"B-b-but think about--imagine--what will it be like when they come for you?"
I don't have to imagine.
Your herd-virtue wavers came for me.
I wanted to peacefully decline a substance because *I believed the data of the institutions you wanted I heed*, but dared to note that their conclusions were despite their own data, thus being PROMISES and not measurements. You demanded I "believe the science" that wasn't there.
Like a bitch, you pleaded on behalf of government.
And you came for me.
I wanted to have community groups that refrained from YOUR values. Literally hobby groups--of which YOU may form your OWN. You bitched and whined that you should be allowed (even celebrated) into being in EVERY INSTANCE.
I'm not a Republican. Not a conservative.
Trump isn't Hitler (clearly, look at how much he loves Israel). Obama isn't the Antichrist.
I don't have to wish they were; to wish they would round you up as you bemoan.
I don't need to hope on them, as fools do; have no need to wish they were true.
You will kill yourself.
And no one will care to stop you.
The worse truth is no one will be coming for you.
And you deserve that.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/80/7b/85/807b855663322d201e4245b1639671cf9578cb9024e941b8ce0c4316de2842d8.jpg

2025-08-19 08:15:31 UTC

- reply

>got lactose tolerance back
>what did you do?
Well, *I* first had to follow a program to build up *all* of my mineral levels (after a blood test, found I needed it), so I'm not sure the exact cut-off of where that ends and where the "these steps are to make you tolerate lactose again" begin. I'll ask when I see her next.
I think it was when I shit for three days lol. (I took some magnesium thing BUT NOT another magnesium thing. I'll have to ask her.) Some good bacteria from your large/small intestine (I forget which) can cross the barrier into the other, and this leads to digestive issues--largely a lactose intolerance.

2025-08-15 14:58:03 UTC

🙏
I can eat dairy again
:parrot_dance:
Haven't tried drinking milk yet. That's the mang boss
Probably will try something like kefir first--something stronger than all the cheese I've downed but lighter than straight milk
https://media.nicecrew.digital/d0/83/d4/d083d4e01ffe876c03a6fb66a8e4b85711e72393b3c79569d16407982e3ca730.webp

2025-08-15 12:25:15 UTC

- reply

I wrote it so I could have it bookmarked or pinned for "here, read this; you won't be convinced; and I won't have typed it yet again" reference.
Atheists and Christians and pagans get reading-the-text-level pieces of the text wrong, regardless of what they interpret from there. It's disappointing to see. I expect it irl from normies with only enough "familiarity" with any of the text and an argument skill set to navigate reddit or their brick-and-mortar "bible study."
When ourguys fight endlessly about this, and they can't even get text-level comprehension pieces straight as premises to stand on to contest their conclusions (that should stand on at least these), it's sad.
But it's been so for centuries. This isn't (lol lmao) an attempt to change that.
Just a sign I can tap for the next time.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/a9/76/d3/a976d3352ff5a888d183e1e330284954116d6b0bb66f5250058b63a469f3623e.jpeg

2025-08-15 09:40:14 UTC

God makes an *unconditional* convenant with Abraham, a promise to follow after his seed, which will become many nations.
Abraham's seed according to the *unconditional* covenant God gave are Israelites. He invites of those Israelites present at Mt Sinai to enter into a *conditional* covenant as His Bride.
That Bride is adulterous--not only entering into covenants with other husbands, but even bearing children by their people--bastards who would not be under the *conditional* covenant nor the *unconditonal* covenant.
The adulterous Bride splits into two kingdoms: a Northern (Ephraim) and a Southern (Judah)--each named after the larger/ruling tribe.
God declares through prophets in both kingdoms that
>He has known no other people but the House of Israel; no other people have known Him
>the House of Israel (two kingdoms and many scattered) has become an adulterous Bride
>He is divorcing the Bride
>the House of Israel--those living and their descendants--will be "Not My People" and "Without Mercy"
>He will scatter them among other people
>yet He will lead them to become fruitful and forgetful abroad, while foreigners make a temporary end of the kingdoms
>He will make it so that a remnant returns for the sake of His word keeping
>all of the House of Israel are His sheep, and He will be the good shepherd, sending fishermen and hunters to gather them back to Him
>He will give to the House of Israel a new covenant, the everlasting covenant
>all of the House of Israel will be saved
The Israelites are overthrown by foreigners.
The kingdoms completely fall.
Most Israelites are scattered far abroad, for centuries. Some had never even received the law. They become nations.
A remnant that was in Babylon returns to the land, to rebuild.
They once again become adulterous.
They once again invite others into the old covenant who cannot be under the covenant. They have bastards by some of them. They are betrayed by these (especially the Edomites, as contemporary historians note), and these are rewarded with positions of governmental and religious rulership (Herod's line and Sanhedrin positions) by the conquering power (Roman) they'd aided. (We call this people "jews" today as they claim the name and we let them.)
God walks in the flesh.
He tells bastards that they are not His sheep and *therefore* do not hear Him--NOT that they are not His sheep because they don't listen; NOT that they may become His sheep. No, God is there for His lost sheep, the lost sheep of the House of Israel, and He is the good shepherd who knows His sheep, and His sheep know Him. The bastards are *not His sheep* as they are not sheep! Let alone lost sheep.
"Unless one is born of above, one cannot see the kingdom of God."
God is crucified, at the behest of the bastards.
This death of the Husband releases the Bride (every Israelite, whether in Judea or abroad, whether faithful or adulterous, aware of forgetful) from the *conditional* old covenant, fulfilled/ended by the death of either party--the Husband, rather than all of the Bride.
God will uphold the *unconditional* covenant He gave to Abraham and his seed that had become many nations.
An earnest of the Spirit is given at pentecost, a partial restoration.
The seed is once more "My People" and "With Mercy."
Israelites that had been descendants of those present at Mt. Sinai and thus under the law--any of these that had become broken away by the divorce--are grafted back (natural branches broken from the cultivated olive tree). Israelites that had never been under the law (not all went to Sinai, so wild olive trees) are under this new covenant (grafted to the tree), as the scope is according to the *unconditional* covenant of God given to Abraham and his seed. Paul spends his ministry conveying this to the seed scattered abroad.
The new covenent will be consummated at the end of the age, at the Wedding Feast of the Lamb, when the Bride and the Husband are reconciled in an everlasting covenant.
The fullness of the Spirit will be given--the restoration, the resurrection of His Bride, whether faithful or not. All of the House of Israel will be saved. (Israelite =/= jew.)
He will then separate nations, by His sheep and the goat nations, and judge by how even the least of the sheep were treated. He will cast the goats away to be no more. All the sheep are saved by grace, yet the sheep will be rewarded each according to their work.
Though first upon His return to separate the nations, He will find His Bride in the wilderness (He had led her to rest in) as the Whore of Babylon, once more unfaithful, giving herself to many nations. He, the only faithful, the only one good, will save her despite herself, kill the rest, and be known by her by this.
The Revelation received is an uncovering of the history until that time, so that we may know that He is true and have encouragement and proof for our faith. (What is the point of the book of Revelation, if not this?)
https://media.nicecrew.digital/46/95/f9/4695f9ba96ca410bac50401798a9b6a193204393738fad8715b082b227c07e0f.gif

2025-08-13 22:06:33 UTC

- reply

🎶 If we can count on you,
my best friend Q,
we know you'll catch that villain

2025-08-13 12:49:21 UTC

- reply

>pork planets
:cat_laugh: :calvin_hobbs_laugh: :animu_laugh:
Pocketing that one, thank you 🙏

2025-08-13 11:48:58 UTC

- reply

INFJ (INFJ-A)
These are fun. People scoff at them, but then profess pattern recognition as their own ultimate power.
The problem is the prolific number of goofed ones, though those tell us nothing about the potential for a good one (like this one).
A long time ago, I read a handful of Carl Jung's books on these (S vs N, T vs N), what it means when any of these functions are oriented in what he referred to as I or E. The I or E in this Myers-Briggs naming system (awkwardly but finely imposed on Jung's ideas) is the orientarion of the T or J (the reasoning function), and it's not whether you're "outgoing" or "like being alone more." If you hear people describe otherwise, then that resource is sensational and/or not understanding and something different than what Jung talked about.

2025-08-12 17:25:12 UTC

- reply

>are emojis punctuation?
I like that concept!
Commas are sometimes unnecessary but included for breath, for emotional beat.
So if punctuation is used to convey emotion, why can't emotes be punctuation?
[cue the end of civilization 😆]

2025-08-12 15:35:33 UTC

I am reminded again:
I don't like Costco-Americans
https://media.nicecrew.digital/d6/4f/55/d64f556de18a682f445e133b0de1ac9924ee2055ef5516ac9b11777a27a1b31d.png

2025-08-10 18:54:39 UTC

- reply

😏
Yeah, I've listened to a few of his interviews. He was raised Catholic, then pivoted to real reddit-tier atheism because that was the more sensible answer accessible that the wider Internet provides rather than the weak answers most brick-and-mortar pastors and friends and family provide.
While writing the first book, he got a girl, thought more about civilization and the state of today's books and entertainment (still has some mainstream takes) and decided that he was deeply misled.

2025-08-10 17:38:16 UTC

- reply

FRIEND DON"T LET THE IDENTITY POLITICS COMMUNISTS TRICK YOU. DON"T FALL FOR CNN
THEY WANT YOU TO THINK IT"S GOD"S PEOPLE THE JEWS
BUT IT"S THE S J W s NOT THE J E W s
SEE IT YET?

2025-08-10 14:59:41 UTC

- reply

>is this muh racism?
lol I wish.
Humans do seem to be huWhite (huge majority, almost total) or Indian (very small portion) in the galactic empire. Don't recall any Asians. One brief character might have been a Kang or Indian (dark skinned).
Constant references to White culture (Romans, Greeks, Egyptians, Napoleon, Shakespeare, the Norse, our myths and battles). The religious / scholastic language is "Classical English" (our English).
Funny thing though: The first book had a few gays in it, and all but one of these ended up being evil traitors in the first book. The one that didn't was a dead-weight coward, and he ended up being a worse traitor in the second book.
These aren't spoilers because the fags act exactly as they do irl rather than as some heroic, idealized celebration--that is the "surprise" lol. If you know how gays will act, then you know how these characters will.
There have been no gays since those.
I wonder whether the author included them for the sake of checking off a list / satisfying a publisher--but made them all hateworthy.
:rofl:

2025-08-09 19:30:29 UTC

All of my complaints with the first two books of the series (mainly the first one) are gone.
I'm 90% through this third installment. It's longer than the first two, and I read it in half the time.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/3d/18/74/3d187468edda29c24cbcd34a2018e305c068513d3b1e2121ba6e3fb83c0596f7.png

2025-08-09 19:26:13 UTC

- reply

I am
I am a pumpkin spice maxxer
Give me pumpkin muffins. Give me pumpkin jam
I eat pumpkin seeds all year round
I'm not some fall floozy, some autumn auto-like. Year round, baby.
The spice must flow.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/ec/49/05/ec49051526436acb576efaaa3200771c1def968837fc09206c8b3b72c09fad4d.png

2025-08-09 07:26:46 UTC

- reply

Hey, Xeno, you haven't shared any shorts/TikToks of foreign "cuisine" lately so I can see if I'm doin' it right :rofl:
I'm headed to bed, but if you have any, throw them my way

2025-08-09 07:19:52 UTC

- reply

🤣 Yeahhhh, I know. 😩 I've noticed with the combo of my phone + the kitchen light the food looks pale too.
I tried two quick angles (determined to bring posts of home life warmth to our corner here).
Then decided I was too hungry to figure it out 😂

2025-08-09 00:55:49 UTC

- reply

I think you usually go for shoot'em up games, and I don't know those as well. (Tell me the good ones? Even the "surely not this one, everyone already knows this" ones.)
I'm usually over in the 4x or rpg games.
BUT I have two recommendations that are not any of these. They're rogue-lites. Inscryption and Hades.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/a1/83/02/a18302d0df9003062ef2b9af653dc444d2952d4f750338944698bc460fdfd10f.png
https://media.nicecrew.digital/9b/ab/72/9bab72bc71236d5d689dbb0101ea5ceac0574e4ff9a50c94d68568185694e1dd.png

2025-08-09 00:32:19 UTC

- reply

>habanero bbq sauce
That sounds amazing

2025-08-08 20:32:35 UTC

- reply

"homogeneous" was the one I was impressed they nodded and smirked to
😏
(I wish I didn't have to be impressed by that, but these are the days)

2025-08-08 20:28:10 UTC

Just had a coded conversation (public) with a cashier about race realism. We both knew what we meant. Very nice encounter.

2025-08-08 06:35:48 UTC

I GO TO BED NOW GUTE NACHT 🙏
https://media.nicecrew.digital/fb/f8/9d/fbf89d16f11ab5098e58f5474c3b10d38aa8fb28376648c1be301b8632f598c2.png

2025-08-08 06:23:06 UTC

- reply

Oh, you like nice things?!
Name 5 nice things.

2025-08-08 05:27:05 UTC

- reply

Ah, a Hump post 😤
Better gather my frens with our rationally directed hatred signs
"The
elephant
isn't
relevant!"
"No elephants
in THIS room!"
"Where was
his trunk
on 9/11?!"
"I guess
elephants
DO forget!"

2025-08-08 01:30:11 UTC

This is where I post from
https://media.nicecrew.digital/a1/be/b1/a1beb1501eb82a84fa477f6c1d1d247276233961b11a8cb454f800fb2635b9fd.jpg

2025-08-08 00:27:30 UTC

- reply

I sometimes do this, too 💀
So, a very tentative observation, made only recently as I've noticed pains and habits going away during this nutrition program Bread and I are on: I did it more when I had less magnesium (not enough).
Could also be me just stopping as I've paid more attention to my habits though 🤷

2025-08-06 15:46:18 UTC

People who unironically use the word 'debunked' are never right.
(They have been debu-... ah, shit.)

2025-08-04 20:13:10 UTC

https://media.nicecrew.digital/c6/87/b0/c687b028795f97b07baccac4806821a323e8cbaa1525a5e9b9cc9a474f09e998.mp4

2025-08-04 17:05:48 UTC

https://media.nicecrew.digital/15/a1/07/15a1079212a3a6be9b4c81b8902278a992b5e91dcd66881c043cdb1e7fb47c51.jpg

2025-08-04 15:10:23 UTC

🙄
https://media.nicecrew.digital/64/40/f8/6440f8c2acd122c8c3f882fb3ae5ad3819c1f9c585b1be3a51093b27e2ea0450.mp4

2025-08-04 01:35:13 UTC

the pulpits of fedi dot com
https://media.nicecrew.digital/d0/34/db/d034dbc537cb2acfcb204e657c4ac59a71cb1ea728347b12f13e53416bbee46e.mp4

2025-08-03 04:34:54 UTC

- reply

Don't listen to him, m'lady, it is me you'd rather spend your valuable gaming recess with. I have 10,000 hours in gaming of various genres, and they say 10,000 hours is the dedication of a master. I don't want to overstep my humility, but my takes are generally among the highest regarded in such circles. If you would deign me worthy of your precious time, I could show you the ropes of any game you choose (preferably not PvP genre). Thank you, and I hope to hear from you soon.

2025-08-02 21:02:31 UTC

- reply

Gave the home a good cleaning this morning.
About to have some friends over to play board games and vidya games

2025-07-31 20:33:13 UTC

- reply

In the US midwest--I think Louisville--a Superman ride at a Six Flags had a cable snap and amputate a woman's feet, mid-ride. (Think this was a long time ago though.)
Luv me rollercoasters, but things are getting janky in general

2025-07-31 20:28:57 UTC

- reply

Where that farther half of the beam comes down and slams into the returning ring 😬 Someone's knees might be there. Hard to tell at a glance

2025-07-31 13:50:29 UTC

- reply

Does cotton candy have its own flavor?
(I'm actually asking, unsure)
I think of ice cream.
There's not really an "ice cream flavor" on its own, y'know? Milk, I guess.
There's the added vanilla, chocolate, rainbow swirley gumdrop flipflop 😆
Maybe for cotton candy it's sugar + whatever? :rofl:

2025-07-31 12:33:17 UTC

Big Blue Jean is trying to entice you with bobs and vagene, to have you forget the breeze as God intended
https://media.nicecrew.digital/b1/d8/69/b1d869ad6cbd10d97a3432953e7fd45f9f9212f3bf940cda1570538eef9c01ae.jpg

2025-07-31 11:36:13 UTC

https://media.nicecrew.digital/9b/9a/16/9b9a16aad0a7f1e83fbabb1418808bd002d2f53d3f163c93fbe0cad38ad75048.mp4

2025-07-30 22:36:43 UTC

- reply

It looks off to me, too--like she has midget arms. 😄 I think you're right that it's the angle.

2025-07-30 21:55:51 UTC

Ghislaine rn (in the Earth's 2025th year)
https://media.nicecrew.digital/9f/24/07/9f240771948be1b90cd8d8ce2a8c0b43e2053435a41be3281226b94566e8ff3b.mp4

2025-07-30 21:45:01 UTC

- reply

:rofl: I've watched this twice in a row now, busting laughing
You can hear the woman's tone change from concerned to indignant to amused with each revelation (kid's presence, kid's intention, dad having moment with his kid)

2025-07-30 20:05:12 UTC

- reply

I watched a video last week covering the rise and fall(?) of the Pirate Software guy. I got curious because he was everywhere in my normie YT algorithm (books, games, animals) for a while and then--silence.
Wild to hear about. Anyway, my fill of e-drama for the year (life).

2025-07-30 05:32:55 UTC

- reply

😭
:cry_hq:
🤣
poor buddy

2025-07-30 04:46:33 UTC

- reply

I know 🤣😭 He ran hard into that tree
What a bad day for a bear

2025-07-30 03:37:58 UTC

https://media.nicecrew.digital/36/b6/7d/36b67d4d5e09fa5623ea72d641f52f8408b4760da33a02b4fd5faa88c1bd1886.mp4

2025-07-29 06:35:47 UTC

Alright, I finished it.
As Brandon Sanderson's Cosmere books begin in fantasy and grow into science fantasy, I would say the Sun Eater series begins in sci-fi and will grow further into science fantasy--from developments in this second installment.
Is this second book a better read than the first book?
By far, yes.
Is it a good read?
Short answer is "No" because it feels incomplete due to the lack of clear arc. Of course there is an overarching rise in this multi-book series, but that rise comes across as the *only* rise. Of course, the overarching rise is just getting started in what is only a second installment. Meanwhile, the "current" events (this book) are told too passively. They feel too overcolored by constant commentary from future knowledge (of the protagonist telling us this tale of his past), less immediate, less dire. These pauses to give melodramatic mini-monologues from this self-contemplative protagonist drags out the book.
Could this be a good series?
Yes, that is possible. The lore is interesting. Maybe once the overarching story becomes the actual action of the books, then it may kick off.
#nevent1q…0cx4
https://media.nicecrew.digital/ab/7a/8b/ab7a8bf88cc725bff69e026d08b2160b95d22c7a8f8755f7bc519cf83641f631.jpg

2025-07-29 06:12:43 UTC

https://media.nicecrew.digital/2b/f4/f7/2bf4f70861f871104778e05c61bb729c49b57ca99acc490d390099f78f41537d.mp4

2025-07-28 23:14:15 UTC

I hope she gets it, tbh
I want more scandals with jewish names; I want the neon pattern more frequent, a strobe light "GUESS WHO" sign flickering for attention brighter with each scandal, demanding of us
https://media.nicecrew.digital/d7/c7/5e/d7c75ef564ad47cd05ad929e7955c4f0b013e728cfeace3e75d883725502e9c2.jpg

2025-07-28 17:36:29 UTC

- reply

Wilhelmill, Wilhelmill, ha ha, no, GCL has never been a witch
:blobcat_raised_eyebrow:
(We don't say it out loud.)
(We only hint--in W drops! Wanons are in control.)

2025-07-28 17:22:40 UTC

Dear @nprofile…r6gr ,
We've had our differences, you and I.
Sometimes, you get witchity ('uppity' for women), and so sometimes--at no fault of my own--I get pitchforkity and make wild claims about, say, "a contract with the devil" and "stepping over seven graves".
Anyway, it's been a year, eh?
I'm glad you still have your cottage at the edge of town. It's a nice reminder of safety and to keep loved ones in mind. Even in your way, you do good for the community that is hard for some to see.
I hope your favorite full moon is this year.
Cheers.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/1a/dc/81/1adc810bc4a1cebf13d80eddf0007296e4d5e0b85aaa186be962701a65b7dbf4.png

2025-07-28 17:09:38 UTC

- reply

"Hm?
Oh, hey, Kek.
Hm, now? You want me to say what to--OH FUCK HIPPIE DIRT DAY TO SALTY THERE I SAID IT WHAT THE FUCK MAN?!"
https://media.nicecrew.digital/ee/eb/bb/eeebbbbee2cce926594557b92ab439823b57d1851f285993c0a961ae201d7c82.png

2025-07-28 10:04:58 UTC

- reply

☕ gmormeeng

2025-07-28 00:42:40 UTC

- reply

>blacks buying their own land, guys, really, so different than whites wanting their own land
Blacks wanting to do *what* with their own land, Kanye?
:thunkd:
https://media.nicecrew.digital/4f/b1/8b/4fb18b71a75b86e0bb3af7e3b257eabd698b474f5974d0c33d57c8cac51b267c.jpg
https://media.nicecrew.digital/58/a5/28/58a528b7e9dd1df38cc025c29bbf1711a59fd51532d884a27f2a0a3f9d96d8f4.jpg
https://media.nicecrew.digital/df/cf/d9/dfcfd95224e383c3db4adab9c7f6356fa92bd67f246a81970ca169e3f58085d2.jpg

2025-07-27 22:44:28 UTC

- reply

Ooohohoho! Pecans and vanilla extract sound purdy good 🍻

2025-07-27 18:23:15 UTC

I have made banana bread for the third time in my life
I am now the master of my own chromosomes
https://media.nicecrew.digital/7b/55/c7/7b55c7ebcfc8ad4ccfa2e7d42e1d5121e41f4fb0d5093df1a346d53bef651988.jpg

2025-07-27 03:53:24 UTC

- reply

Just talking about the movie again for a sec:
I've been curious to see the big movies to be showcased after the "change" (hoodwinking attempts, fake dial back) of this year--the general pause in blatant advertisement of how much they hate White men, the pause in pride month logos, the pause in excessive Women Are the Man messaging, etc. Not everywhere--and not really a change. Just in presentation.
I mean, what will the movies even be about now? 😆
Fantastic Four was bad--definitely the recovery set-up piece for a broader story for future Marvel movies. The story, though bad, was better than what Marvel had released some years ago when I'd last watched anything, which I'd heard had only gotten worse since.
The story focuses on being excited to have a baby--and then not giving up that baby (two of the Fantastic Four are the new parents) for the sake of saving the world, despite the world calling for them to sacrifice the baby.
Just weird to see in the year of our Lord, 2025.
I know it for what it is. (Obviously, I pointed out the prolonged pro-jew message.) It's just humorous to see the stories and themes change to a "please be like how you were in the 2000s" messaging.

2025-07-27 03:20:52 UTC

The Fantastic Four movie has a laughable pause in the flow to nod "Look how appealing and nice the jews are! Remember us this way?"
In the show, the world is about to end. The Thing (rock guy) has had some random, plot-interruptive, kind interactions outside of a particular building, and a particular girl (shown once) catches his eye.
On the possible last day of Earth, he walks into that building. There he finds a big "star of David" revealed, huge on our silver screen, lingered on, *held for a bit*. Further inside, he finds a crowd with curly sideburns framing their sad victim faces.
He finds the girl he's had an eye on, smiles. Says he's there for her. (Movie cuts away.)
It is funny that he's a golem. 😆
She didn't even have khazar milkers.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/80/92/0b/80920ba4ba72efcd729a2ccaa1e9f7a696a045ef76d6e49c58308b78453d713a.png

2025-07-27 02:53:59 UTC

- reply

Yeah, I felt bad for yellin' at a colorblind friend, but he needs to pay attention to my hobbies

2025-07-26 17:14:47 UTC

- reply

we stopped dem in they prime cuh jus magine if we din stop they pragress like fr think how they made purmids even tho theys inna desert think how hurd that is

2025-07-26 16:36:19 UTC

- reply

😆 I'm dying over how the nigger in back reined in the grammar (giving them the words they should use; "temperature" instead of "acurrrcy") and STILL he was like, "Yeahhhh, man, cuz like dey don put out grease fur wit watah, know? cuz like da heat--water--is liquid fur"

2025-07-26 15:40:11 UTC

🔥 🐒
https://media.nicecrew.digital/db/4c/e6/db4ce6c9f1dcbfe04cde51bd20efd73b0dc034ce3ab1ca4dd2e36b8c282d47ee.mp4

2025-07-26 15:17:34 UTC

- reply

Going to Costco is like visiting Canada
Everything is packaged differently and I am shoulder-to-shoulder in an Indus River of walking shalalalalamans

2025-07-26 14:30:09 UTC

https://media.nicecrew.digital/c9/55/b9/c955b9cdd9b86b5ea459c1dd5bb2f4a9c77e37ca6b1932d7f272491d85ca1635.jpg

2025-07-25 22:18:16 UTC

There's apparently going to be a new Avatar show
Insha'allah AI video processing will be so good that I can make the characters White every frame and have them scream slurs instead of whenever writers would have them promoting the gay
https://media.nicecrew.digital/92/07/eb/9207eb92cd65d9e28c9cd2c48ab2370e6dfa6ecadfa747fb60babbd72a9ded18.webp

2025-07-24 06:27:34 UTC

😩
60% in. Unfortunately now hitting brief but frequent slogs of the main character waxing preachy-philosophical.
Inner monologues. Shakespearean.
This author is stretching the skin of classics (Dante, Greek mythology, Christian creation story), working them onto the horrors and wonders of this leg (book) of a longer space opera, borrowing their gravitas for his own mythopoeia.
It's fun--but the gimmick needs to be shorter to be more effective. (Then the repetition will carry more.)
#nevent1q…enzv

2025-07-23 18:03:55 UTC

- reply

Thinking about a female sasquatch has me thinking of the ent wives, how they've not been seen in a long time 😔
Anyway, so would you rather be raped by an ent wife or a sasquatch wife?
(You can choose both.)

2025-07-22 19:31:18 UTC

33% through the second book, Howling Dark.
Already able to report my problems with the first book are signficantly diminished or removed. Much better.
#nevent1q…8hg2
https://media.nicecrew.digital/ab/7a/8b/ab7a8bf88cc725bff69e026d08b2160b95d22c7a8f8755f7bc519cf83641f631.jpg

2025-07-22 17:50:36 UTC

Yes, it's evil that employers--even those owned by Whites--will let you go for speaking pro-White points.
It is also childishly stupid--essentially asking to be hit without a trade-off of having curated any benefit--to go on Jubilee, smirk, make yourself look like a dumbass to an unmoved audience of degenerates who now have your name and face.
This isn't akin to the "I was protecting my child and possessions in a park, and yes I will call them a nigger for being a nigger" situation. This is waltzing to their trench (out of view of anyone who would be convinced anyway) and farting and asking for resources now that your ass is on fire.
Christ spoke in parables to the general crowd (for numerous reasons) and ran to the mountains after speaking, frequently.
We are not greater than Christ.
We have anonymity as our protection when speaking to the general crowd, allowing us straight-talk rather than parables--rather than needing parables for plausible deniability. And we still have parables as a method for irl group talk--but never for an audience that DOES NOT INCLUDE people that would hear you. No benefit.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/6a/f3/09/6af3093319a4e0dc7d165c736694b4d77d75576754b857a4b7d626c713d53d3b.jpg

2025-07-21 01:26:30 UTC

I finished reading Empire of Silence by Christopher Ruocchio.
I was kept mildly interested through the book, sometimes dipping beneath bored and sometimes tossed off the surface--airborne momentarily and thrilled--by moving beats. I would say I didn't feel gripped until the last 10%.
I've heard the purple prose* (definition at end if you're not familiar with the term) drones on less and is more effective when used in the second book. It was problem in this first book. Those moments of some given point, carried too long with a lofty air, make the book a slog or cringe in some chapters. (Note: chapters are 5 to 10 pages in this, which is nice for hit and run reading.)
All in all, I see the potential set up for a grand series. This is just a long set up, mang.
---
*Purple prose is flowery language that can range from describing even a horror in a way that rings beautiful and cutting (good use) or to self-indulgence that reads like begging / tooting that they are the smartest and most initiated redditer (bad use).
https://media.nicecrew.digital/b0/ef/36/b0ef36c8b7beeba74ad887e808f4cc26f5a5383e7fef6d5ebe8feb595a0d7d00.jpg

2025-07-19 18:20:06 UTC

Okay, do not tell him, but I have broken into @nprofile…wku4 's sweet ride. My hands are shaking (not from nervousness. I slammed two energy drinks to stay awake. Get ready for a marathon of focused driving texts.)
@nprofile…29hm
https://media.nicecrew.digital/ac/5d/74/ac5d74967f105edb7a676de6dbf55b344b0007c52592d2df3a0cc3c328f5a9d3.mp4

2025-07-06 01:07:37 UTC

- reply

Nothing I've said claims they're not human.
They're not *from Adam*, if the genealogies in scripture are true (entire lists of nations of the same ethnicity--and those nations we know descended from these).
You'll find that you end up following the nations of Whites through time.
All from Adam are humans, but not all humans are from Adam.
All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares.
All dogs are canines, but not all canines are dogs.
>non-Whites and salvation
I wrote about this a few posts ago in this thread, so I'll say it this way instead:
Notice in Genesis there are two "trees," and at the end of Revelation there is one "tree" ("bearing 12 kinds of fruit" in a "city"--which is also called the Bride, which is what the Israelites are called, even in the very verse in which God promises a new covenant--this city is described as being decorated with 12 kinds of stones--the same 12 kinds as those associated with the Israelites in scripture--and having twelve gates, each with the name of an Israelite tribe).
This is not a literal city, of course. The tree is not a literal tree. It is God, the true "vine" (also translated as "trunk" if talking about a tree), bearing "12 kinds of fruit," and the only way in is by the 12 gates. It's screaming who the branches are.
So, if not of Christ (which is not "believing in Christ"), then no, they are not saved. Christ is the way. Christ is, in various ways, as Paul writes, a "second Adam."
One must be born *of above* (not "again"), born of water and Spirit; what is flesh is flesh and what is Spirit is Spirit.
That means being born of the flesh is not enough; one needs also to be born of the promise, the faith, which is the unconditional covenant given to Abraham (that his seed would become many nations). This is why Christ tells the Pharisees (who had, according to Ezra, Nehemiah, Malachi and more--even secular historians of the time in agreement--become largely occupied by more and more non-Israelites, particularly Edomites, meaning of Esau who took Hittites as wives)--why Christ tells the Pharisees, when they proclaim they're "not born of fornication" but are of Abraham, that being of Abraham was not enough. Esau is of Abraham. The promise followed Jacob, by God, and such is the faith. (This is the point of Romans 9.)
What is flesh is flesh; what is Spirit is Spirit. It's a necessity of both.
Just as Christ rejected the Edomites though they were of Abraham (those of the flesh but not the Spirit), Christ will also reject those who are of Adam ("what is the flesh is flesh") if they are not of the Spirit ("what is the Spirit is Spirit")--meaning those who are not, therefore, "born of above."
And that's if they're mixed ("of Adam", "of the flesh")-- let alone if they're not even "of the flesh" at all.
A non cannot be of the Spirit if they're not of the flesh, as God gave His Spirit to Adam.
One can be of the flesh though and not of the Spirit (i.e. not in a covenant). (Example: Edomites.)
Notice that every covenant God gives is to someone and their descendants.

2025-07-05 22:01:34 UTC

- reply

Yes, the Nephilim are not angels. That isn't the claim.
(C'mon, guy... )
They're not giants, as some say, either. They are "the fallen," as their name translates.
They are the offspring of the "sons of God" who took wives of the "daughters of men."
They are also described physically, later in Joshua and Numbers, as they are encountered. The descriptions are not of normal men.
And, yes, I agree wholeheartedly there are plenty of times (I would even say most of the time) when "sons of God" refers to Israelites--those times being *once there are Israelites.*
(Even at some of the times the link you provided, when the researchers say the term at those times "certainly refers to angels"--such as in Job--it's referring to Israelites.)
Christ even acknowledges the term as referring to Israelites, making (I believe, off the top of my head) a reference to a psalm, when the Pharisees take offense at the term.
And, yes, as the link you provided states *just as certainly*, there are times when "sons of God" clearly means angels.
So, when we read the term as used in Genesis 6 *before* there is a Jacob (the man Israel), meaning before there are Israelites... and the term is being specifically contrasted with the "daughters of men"...
Any state-safe researchers stamping their question mark and wagging a finger at implications means nothing. (I'd remind you that these are the same voices that shy away from saying perhaps niggers aren't suitable for White civilization; who use "Jew" and "Israelite" as synonyms, even calling Moses a "Jew" when he lived and died well before there was a kingdom of Judah; that say the dispute over "the body of Moses" in Jude is some angelic fight over Moses' physical body rather than the Moses and accusers disputing in leading the congregation of Israel, exactly what the term "body of Moses" means, as it is used elsewhere in scripture.)
Catch notice that "disputed at best" does not pass any weight at all to "not the case" (especially when the dispute, really, is for the sake of anti-racism, of not promoting a race.) It could be claimed by the same standard (just "being in despute") that your stance of rejection rather than acceptance is equally then "disputed at best."
There is nothing wrong conceptually (nor scripturally, which is the important basis) with God supremacy. It is not that we are White that is the inherant superiority and favor. It is that God gave to *us* His Spirit, from Adam onward, and restored us by His grace through His coming in the flesh--He being the true vine and we the branches.
(Btw, why are there unclean animals? How did this come to be? It's clearly not the law that makes them unclean, as Noah is instructed to take seven of each clean and two of each unclean animal. This is 1,500 years before the law.)

2025-07-05 19:12:00 UTC

- reply

I wonder whether chickpeas are just particular, needing some exactness somewhere in the process.
I've never had anything made of chickpeas that was edible that wasn't pre-packaged hummus 😅
The worst I ever had was rotini made of chickpeas. The boiling pot smelled awful, and the rotini was the slimiest, soggiest grossest slop. (Probably needs cooking for less time than the instructions said.)

2025-07-05 16:51:05 UTC

- reply

What have I said about the Nephilim that was read far too much into the text?
I only referred to scripture which says they were in the land in those days and after.
Are you suggesting angels came again and took more wives *after* the flood?
If not, then it is the case that they survived the flood, as the Israelites encounter more of them in Canaan.
Or do you read the Nephilim as unrelated to Noah's story?
It's not a random interjection in Genesis. It's the beginning to the tale of Noah--the reason for the flood. This is why God deems it appropriate to flood the land in 120 years.
(More than 1000 years later, Jacob tells Pharoah that he's 130 years old when asked. When someone says the 120 years mentioned in the tale of Noah is God putting a 120-year limit on lifespan, such a claim is thus demonstrably incorrect.)
>The word translated as "generations" in the phrase you quote is not a matter of genetics but of time.
(You will go on in the next sentence to tell me that the word for genealogy is used.)
>In fact, the verse containing the quoted phrase uses two different words which are both translated "generation(s)": תּוֹלְדָה meaning genealogical descent, and דּוֹר meaning an era or the time span of a particular generation of people.
Follow your own premises here and you'll find my conclusion. As you say, the passage uses two words which have been translated as one--one word, which can mean 'time'--or *'dwelling'*, quite importantly--and one for *'genealogical descent'.*
Why mention genealogy if it's so immaterial, not consequential?
Why bring it up right after talking about angels taking wives of the daughter of Adam?
>"These are the generations(genealogy) of Noah. Noah was a righteous man, perfect in his generations(dwelling): Noah walked with God. And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth."
This makes sense after scripture introduced the issue that God is solving.
That aside, there is another Hebrew word, related, with the same consonants (important, as it was not practice to write the short vowels, so only context may distinguish between possibilities--or not, if both related words are appropriate and it's hard to determine which to use), which is דור. It means to remain, to inhabit, to circle. (Similar to the meaning of 'dwelling' the word you mentioned holds.)
So, then, also possible is:
>"These are the generations(genealogy) of Noah. Noah was perfect in his generations(circle, habitation): Noah walked with God. And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth."
Or look to the Septuagint--a chronologically closer translation by those who had a grasp of the now dead language Hebrew that we will never recover, from a time before now when we have to resort to writing Noah's ark was made of "gopher" wood, transliterating the word because no one knows what it means anymore. The Hebrew word that you assert means 'generation, as in time' (though it means 'dwelling' as well) was translated there as γενεά, which is a "generation" as in current iteration of a γένος (a stock, a race)'.
However you want to view it, translating two distinct words both as one word may smear the distinction in translation, but it does not nullify the point of using the distinct words in the original language. I agree with the distinction and want both words. Asserting that it is only the second word that matters, only the second that is used to justify Noah--and then limiting it to one of its meanings, discarding the other--despite the context of mixing already being set in the tale, with scripture's statement of *why* the flood was happening--does not keep its integrity.

2025-07-05 14:26:05 UTC

- reply

That means they're fast

2025-07-05 14:25:47 UTC

- reply

I like the stripes on their tails :smiley_hug:

2025-07-05 14:19:56 UTC

- reply

:rofl:
That's fun 😊
But now that we have confirmed feline presence
:pepe_pitchfork: :pepe_pitchfork: :pepe_pitchfork: :pepe_torch:

2025-07-05 14:16:16 UTC

- reply

GCL, do you have a cat? (This is not a witch hunt question and will not be used against you)

2025-07-05 13:23:40 UTC

- reply

Why was Noah picked of all people?
>"Noah was a righteous man, and perfect in his generations: Noah walked with God."
"perfect in his generations"
Take a breath and think: What does "perfect in his generations" mean?--and right after an introduction that talks about the sons of God taking wives of the daughters of Adam.
This is not to say Noah was the only uncorrupted descendant of Adam. Of any that were "perfect in [their] generations," only Noah would be in the line of first born (following the order of first born son outliving their father's passing, Noah being the eighth from Adam), which is how he's "the eighth preacher of righteousness" as 2 Peter declares. (It is worth looking at how wildly our different versions "translate" that verse. They add whole terms, trying to piece together how Noah is "eighth." Some decide he was just "eighth on the boat." 🙄)
The flood did not kill everyone and was not meant to. It was meant for the descendants of Adam--to start over with Noah, perfect in his generations, eighth in the line of first born, the eighth preacher of righteousness--because God lamented that those of Adam were becoming corrupted *racially* (which results in irreversible corruption, as we see even today). That is the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit--the blasphemy of that which God had given only to Adam. One may blaspheme the Son of Man and be forgiven, but the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, as it cannot be undone. The children will not be of the promise. A bad tree cannot produce good fruit, a good tree cannot produce bad fruit, and no where is it said a bad tree becomes a good tree.
It matters because of *how* Christ's salvation works.
It is Christ who is now the preacher of righteousness, the mediator, after that same consideration of first born priests/mediators (or as Paul states it in Hebrews, "after the order of Melchizedek," a transliteration of the Hebrew for "righteous king"). It is Christ, being God, that is the true vine, by the Spirit, rather than Adam. Even Adam is--by the Spirit given to him by God (who is Christ)--a son. And so, being the descendants then of our Father, we are the branches--and only through Christ, who is called the way and the life *because of this.*
We are not found as cursed descendants of a forefather (Adam), who would be our mediator, a cursed and sinful one, who died and would be replaced by the firstborn surviving him. Nor are we found with any of that line of firstborn as our mediator, who would also be found corrupt and also pass to death. Instead the forefather of even Adam (as He gave to Adam His Spirit) has come as a son of man. God Himself is our Father, by this, the true vine. And the justification of the restoration/resurrection (however you want to translate it) will be by this consideration. He is the vine; those descended from Him are the branches.
"Every plant which my heavenly Father planted not, shall be rooted up."

2025-07-05 13:23:06 UTC

- reply

The story of Noah begins:
>The Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after
"and also after"
They weren't killed off by the flood. Joshua and other Israelites find them in Canaan. So, no, according to the scripture we all share, not everyone is descended from Noah.
>"But that's the Nephilim," some have argued. "A special case. But all normal humans are descended from Noah."
Look to the list of nations who are descended from Noah (Gen 10). We see from Gen 13 to Gen 15 tribes *not on that list*--even tribes that had been named prior to the flood and not listed as descended from Noah, here found well and alive after the flood.
We also see *two distinct sets of directions* to the Israelites of how to handle different tribes as they conquer the land of Canaan. The tribes of which they are instructed it is fine to take wives of *are on the list.* The tribes of which they are told to not take wives--to not even take livestock--*are not on the list* (or had mixed with the tribes not on the list, explicitly stated in scripture).
This same reasoning is why Abram had cared about his son having a wife of his own people, though living among Canaanites--going so far as to send a servant to his people to find one. And then Isaac after this, telling his sons they are not to take wives of the Canaanites.
Not doing this is the sin Esau committed, taking Hittite wives to anger his father and mother--so much so that Rebekah, his mother, laments what her life is worth if Jacob also were to do the same.

2025-07-04 20:22:47 UTC

- reply

Fair warning--we're probably not going to agree on this, but the following is what I mean:
The passages aren't quoted by anyone wanting to counter the Gospel at all.
They are quoted by those wanting to share the Gospel--but who are expanding the Gospel beyond its scope (which is described in those same passages that are used as a counterargument--specifically Romans 9 and Galatians 3), wanting to counter the concept that Christ saved everyone He intended to--and that that was not everyone.
Christ has saved all of Israel (meaning the Israelites, of which most Christians have a hard time distinguishing from todays jews--as much as ourguys, unfortunately, have a hard time distinguishing the term 'Israelites' from 'Judeans' of the NT and OT, a distinguishment found in scripture).
He died for the descendants of Adam and no one else. Non-Whites are not from Adam. Handing them the Gospel is like handing a love letter written to you and passing it on to them. It will say "you", but it's not about/for/to them.
Usually, quotes from Romans 9 and/or Galatians 3 are thrown as the counterargument (respectively, "not all descended from Israel are of Israel" and "no Jew or Greek, male or female," etc.)--and then, *if* a discussion about what those passages say can be had (which is not often, due to the temperament of the person quoting), it usually ends with their quoting of Revelation 7 ("out of every nation and tribe and peoples and tongue") as a "finisher," not wanting to question the purpose of Dan missing from the list in that same chapter.
Again, we probably won't agree here. I appreciate you catching the typo, either way 🤍

2025-07-04 19:47:17 UTC

- reply

Thank you
Typing while talking makes Ash dumb

2025-07-04 19:39:15 UTC

>Romans 9, Galatians 3, and Revelations 7
Probably the three chapters from which snippets are quoted the most at those who think like me to "prove" what we're saying is false.
It is ironic because those are probably three of the strongest passages stating exactly what we're saying. They're where we even get the idea.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/9c/54/63/9c546341fb5111425edcafc2665633e65ed9523b18d8a9a515b67a67ccda9ace.jpg

2025-07-04 06:41:24 UTC

read Hosea, Amos, Micah, and some into Isaiah tonight
tomorrow I'll finish Isaiah and read Nahum and Joel
it's good to remember that Christ and His apostles referred to the OT for foundation of what there is to have faith in--and then would make the point that Christ is the fulfillment of that faith

2025-07-03 12:52:12 UTC

https://media.nicecrew.digital/1b/02/cf/1b02cf2a2d78ad4daa7ece1cc0b78a7623fb808e46603febadf55d9cff781ace.mp4

2025-06-30 01:58:24 UTC

- reply

L M A O
Thank you for this guidance. I really needed to know.
This will help me in my understanding in how to approach interactions.

2025-06-30 01:56:00 UTC

@nprofile…whk6
!prompt
The options of Pokemon types are grass, fire, water, electric, ice, normal, flying, rock, ground, steel, fighting, bug, psychic, ghost, dark, poison, fairy, dragon. A person may be 1 or 2 types.
What types are Ash, Bread, GolfCartLady, Jill, Kek, Kiki88, Madison, Matty, Omega, Owl, Rose, Tyler, and Xenophon?

2025-06-29 21:58:16 UTC

- reply

https://media.nicecrew.digital/5b/7b/db/5b7bdbfdbd0b8f6dae1370ac097fbe29d931883c891acd3dea4e010d74d4e85e.jpg

2025-06-25 05:13:52 UTC

- reply

This doesn't touch the more broad topic of asking the dead to intercede.
(inb4 "It's asking the living to intercede. They're not dead." I'm not arguing their state with that statement. You know what a woman is; you know what I mean by dead.)
I almost find the broader topic unnecessary to address because--of all the dead--Mary is the go-to GOAT, the frequent, the common, the mentioned, the Hail Mary.
I would go so far as to say the broader idea is held fervently primarily for the sake of being able to ask Mary to intercede.

2025-06-25 04:56:50 UTC

I've heard both sides--the supporting arguments and the dissenting of those writing in multiple threads and across forks of threads--regarding the asking of Mary to pray for us.
Here's why it's strange:
Where is even an approximating equal emphasis on Joseph? He was the male of the chosen family, the man to oversee the newborn Christ.
He too received a visitation from a messenger, announcing--independent of the visitation to Mary.
Why not an equal *or even greater emphasis* on asking Moses?
Someone so holy (meaning set aside for God's purposes) as to have been at the transfiguration; as to have led the Israelites across a parted sea (after having performed other wonders); as to have written five books of scripture; as to have overseen the construction of the ark of the covenant.
Why not *at least an equal emphasis* on David? Scriptually described as "a man after God's own heart"--so much so that it was promised the rule of his line would never end, such that Christ is called the branch from the root of Jesse (David's father). It is only for this promise from God to David that Mary is even considered as it were.
Why such an emphasis instead on "the mother"?
It's because we have
the Father,
the Son,
and so need the...
And that's it. That's the beg.
After a more extreme fashion, the Gnostics instead fill this in with Sophia (the feminine Wisdom). (And they are wrong to do so.)
No, friends, you don't have to run into protestantism's clearly broken arms and kneel into their awkward (i.e. broken) support. You are free to see that the arms that *are holding you* though are also fucked up.
The lack of admittance of this is, in fact, why the myriad fractals of protestantism (and all of its faults) began.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/70/73/70/7073702fb8d4e64255865f7f6a5223abaed80e88d2ad2656122daeeeaad8d60d.png

2025-06-24 12:38:01 UTC

https://media.nicecrew.digital/15/06/1b/15061b00c4d51200c1bb2018e2fa7f79a0f27033393062e6d3175edcf8529eff.jpg

2025-06-17 22:17:53 UTC

- reply

When you do this, do you have categories of things in mind to beeline your way toward or do take in the upfront ads and follow your nose from there?

2025-06-06 20:52:57 UTC

Well, it depends on what you mean by 2D--like--YES, I can imagine that I would generally be drawn in an instinctual and even conscious, PURPOSED, manner to the archtype of bewb, even mommyism. And that's like, okay, fair enough.
Now do I like them flat? Well, I mean, I certainly like them *pressed.* Is that 2D?
Perhaps you mean more specifically do I like them *drawn*?
Well, are they not masterpieces--how would you say?--drawn flat, as in moving in one direction?--and by that I mean in Time. You see? Even 3D bewbs are then, you could say, pressed ALWAYS in a certain dimension.
And just as flat and unreachable! The memory image one can conjure of the 3D mommy milkers one has witnessedzzor is currently witnessing--beholding!--that very second are as drawn as the 2D Fern Funbags. It's truly, truly remarkable the... the lack of clear distinction.
https://media.nicecrew.digital/ae5d4e9209b039bd8dd17ee36a4f2d1a8ae9a690ced43c0147f4a28c9e5ef7b7.png

2025-06-06 12:20:36 UTC

- reply

will you please stop hinting at us that you provide so much for us as the HOA president