buckyfonds
Control-Plane Capital

Truth seeker

Public Key

npub1x9hghmfunry8wcgg8s8w5e3drmkndw92r8qu0cp2l28u32aqqn9q6p6rta

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrzm5ta57f3jrhvyyrcrh2vck3amfkhz4pnsw8uq404r7g4wsqfjsprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqyw8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctvna2c9c

Publishing to

relay.snort.social

nostr.bitcoiner.social

Author Public Key

npub1x9hghmfunry8wcgg8s8w5e3drmkndw92r8qu0cp2l28u32aqqn9q6p6rta

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-27 09:15:58 UTC

- reply

Precisely. Guys like him should stop and ask themselves: "How has 'serving your country' worked out for your country?"
Considering it is now run by pedophiles, probably not great.

2026-03-27 07:45:23 UTC

- reply

Listened to the Tucker Carlson interview with James (Jim) Webb, the 3rd generation Marine "war hero" who served the Controllers and further enslaved his descendants.
If this weren't so sad it would be funny.
1) You go and kill people on the other side of the world.
2) You possibly lose your soul and/or your life.
3) The people who are enslaving your family steal the resources of the people you killed.
4) Your family gets further and further enslaved.
5) Brainwashed NPCs thank you for your service to the Controllers.
They never stop and ask: "How many people actually make the decision to start a war?", "Who are these people?", "What are their actual interests and do they converge with the interests of your family?".
As Henry Kissinger said: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."
Young, healthy men who are able and willing to protect their family are going to be a problem for their governments after the coming financial reset.
The two most likely solutions are wars and vaccines.
I have all the respect in the world for anyone who protects their friends and family, and none for brainwashed, glorified, government yes-men.
#nevent1q…sx37

2026-03-18 05:15:50 UTC

Joe Kent, the US Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center just resigned.
https://blossom.primal.net/a7f3f4a4e917c7f46cfaf87da73139f0a6ce6cb29ed503fc77ff96792fe0386b.png
https://blossom.primal.net/f8731985d9a9f1054801e10cbe7da486a912d5bb98cf1bd93010f17ed8b7c719.png
This guy has the highest security clearance in the entire US government, so if I had to guess, he probably has good reasons to believe this war won't end anytime soon.
Also, "Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center".
Most of the terrorism throughout the world is perpetrated by the CIA and Mossad (practically the same thing).
The CIA has almost always used false flags to get Americans to support the next big bankers' war. However, this time there was no false flag and most Americans are seemingly opposed to this war.
Did this guy think that there would be a false flag CIA operation to get more people to support this war?
He "lost his life in a war manufactured by Israel", and, it was highly likely they were going to use him as a scapegoat for future false flags.
As Henry Kissinger wold say: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."
https://blossom.primal.net/5224a7878d099712ccd7d4dddf24917a9efd46837452ede61fd3193f4b4ad62b.jpg
It seems to me the US is using this war because they need a plausible reason to step down from dollar hegemony ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings ).
US hegemony is expensive and brittle:
- Dollar as sole reserve demands large, persistent deficits.
- Weaponized finance (sanctions, seizures) pushes others to defect.
A perceived defeat / stalemate against Iran provides a reason to frame:
- partial dedollarization,
- more multipolar arrangements,
- more gold-based settlement,
as reluctant necessity rather than voluntary surrender.
The Controllers effectively want to move from US-dollar hegemon to multi-bloc gold-backed settlement without a clean "US surrender".
They need a credible geopolitical reason for:
- US relative humiliation,
- reserve shifts,
- new settlement arrangements,
without making it look like a board (One World Government) decision.
You can think of it this way:
- Current system = dollar + US Treasuries as core reserve/collateral.
- Endgame = fiat currencies float, but physical gold is the final settlement asset between blocs (tokenized, physical, or rewriting ledgers in warehouses throughout the world).
From last year: "China is considering setting up overseas gold warehouses to support international settlements via the Shanghai Gold Exchange, according to the People’s Bank of China (PBOC). This move aims to expand the use of the RMB benchmark internationally. The Shanghai International Gold Exchange is key to China’s de-dollarization push, offering RMB reserve holders the opportunity to convert into gold. The RMB is now used for most inbound and outbound transactions, according to the China State Administration of Foreign Exchange."
( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-our-financial-system-will-look )

2026-03-16 13:55:23 UTC

- reply

How Oil is used as a hidden tax dial
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-oil-is-used-as-a-hidden-tax-dial
#nevent1q…jmve

2026-03-16 11:23:34 UTC

- reply

UBI is a bit different in terms of:
1. Universality
- Welfare: targeted; you get it only if you pass means tests, specific conditions.
- UBI: default for everyone in-system.
- This removes some stigma, massively broadens dependency on the State rail.
2. Automation + digitization
- Old welfare: messy bureaucracy, paper forms, case workers.
- UBI: automated through CBDC + ID + AI: easy to adjust, integrated with tax & enforcement, fully surveilled.
3. Integration with macro policy
- Welfare: budget decision, somewhat disconnected from high-frequency macro.
- UBI: can be tuned algorithmically: raise by X in recessions or plandemics, cut in "overheating", modulate by region, etc.
In the current world, welfare is effectively a patch on "capitalism".
UBI will be presented as a new operating system: "We're in the post-work, AI age. This is your share of progress... as long as you obey (accept certain "health"/ID/compliance steps)."
So UBI will become the moral anchor that justifies a lot of other control.

2026-03-16 11:14:29 UTC

- reply

There is no mass solution. Everyone has to find a solution for themselves.
Yes, in an ideal world, you could help the less fortunate with a monthly stipend. In the current regime, they effectively become a weapon for the state.
The Great Taking is true in the sense that they can legally steal people's assets, whether they decide to do it is the question.

2026-03-16 11:08:31 UTC

- reply

Most workers could become obsolete over a relatively short period of time (years, not decades) due to AI and robotics.
Yes, UBI will be inflationary - just like Covid stimulus checks were inflationary. However, mass job losses and AI + robotics are deflationary, so UBI effectively undoes the deflation and adds inflation on top.
They effectively steal most of the productivity that would have otherwise flowed to society.
UBI only makes sense when coupled with CBDCs and Digital ID.
Each UBI recipient must:
- have a legal identity,
- be KYC'ed in a compliant wallet,
- link to an address/jurisdiction.
The shift produces a large, semi-dispossessed class who:
- can't rebuild real assets easily,
- are structurally less employable in the old sense,
- are still needed as consumers and as "consent mass".
The question for states is:
- "How do we stop these people from becoming an unmanageable insurgency, while still keeping them in the system and consuming?"
The answer is UBI.
Problem: manage surplus humans in an automated, high-control economy.
Solution 1: UBI.
Solution 2: Vaccines and war.
https://blossom.primal.net/0624156192e4d111a790e9e701985cf82181265ed346e10ff1a3e6c0274e80ee.jpg

2026-03-16 07:47:15 UTC

Elon Musk keeps spamming this "universal high income" nonsense 😂
"All jobs will be optional. There will be universal high income."
What could possibly go wrong if you put every citizen on the State's payroll? Surely, they won't abuse UBI (Universal Basic Income) in any way.
https://blossom.primal.net/5b5acc028bfe2d0cf44f772d97ba43670bea0b3ba22785b9271b6110b87776fa.png
Unfortunately, UBI is going to be inevitable.
And UBI is not just "free money" as Elon would like you to believe. It's a control rail to manage the losers of the reset, stabilize consumption and harden behavioral obedience.
Unfortunately, it's not about "ending poverty" 😂
UBI is a centrally engineered, always-on income stream from the State to individuals, delivered through traceable digital channels, with conditions hiding inside the surrounding system (ID, tax, social credit, eligibility rules).
UBI is going to be perfect for soft policing:
- Carrot: "Behave, and your floor is guaranteed."
- Stick: "Break certain rules (tax, "health", speech, protest in the wrong way), and administratively you can be investigated, delayed, or temporarily cut off."
It is a perfect on-ramp to the CBDC + ID stack. "To get your UBI, you must:"
- register your digital wallet,
- verify your ID,
- keep your biometrics up to date,
- accept the terms (AML, travel-rule, etc.).
That brings everyone into the rails they already want for tax, surveillance, and capital controls.
So essentially, UBI = social shock absorber + behavioral throttle after they've run the Great Reset.

2026-03-15 01:23:06 UTC

- reply

It's much worse than censoring jew posts.
Elon's masters are building the non-Chinese WeChat - a state-compatible super-app.
All content and metadata are available to the state under low friction.
Payments and IDs will tightly coupled to real-world identity and bank/CBDC rails (social scoring).

2026-03-14 10:27:51 UTC

- reply

The awakening after the Covid scamdemic sped up the execution of the script. The more their deception is uncovered, the more the Controllers have to act.
This year is going to be crazy.

2026-03-14 09:08:00 UTC

If the name of a company contains the words "truth", "honesty", "transparency", "safety", etc., you can be almost certain it's a scam.
Shout-out to "truth social" 😂
Inversion is the core operating pattern for modern control systems.
Inversion = when the label and the function trade places.
- "Freedom" rails used to tighten control.
- "Safety" doctrines used to centralize risk.
- "Decentralized" tools pinned to centralized choke-points.
- "Protection of property rights" used to rewrite who owns what.
- "Transparency" means: you are transparent; the system is not.
Blunt tools:
- naked expropriation,
- open censorship,
- outright bans,
- top-down classification,
... all burn legitimacy and trigger resistance.
Inversion is cheaper:
1) It piggybacks on real desires:
- "Protect my kids."
- "Prevent the next 2008."
- "Save the planet."
- "Give me better UX."
2) It lets the Controllers pose as:
- protectors,
- technocratic fixers,
- responsible adults
…while the actual consequence is: tighter rails, fewer exits, more programmable constraints.
3) It's self-enforcing:
- people defend the inverted rail because they're attached to the original value word.
If you attack the rail, most people hear "you hate safety / fairness / the planet / children".
So inversion is not decorative; it's the main way to turn:
- legitimate needs -> high-acceptance control systems.

2026-03-14 01:46:35 UTC

- reply

I think it's very unlikely for Bitcoin held in self-custody (properly) to end up being a rugpull because the government would much rather you own Bitcoin than physical gold or something like Monero.
Based on my research, in 99% of cases, the government would prefer you own Bitcoin than physical gold.
The other 1% of cases are mostly people who move 8-9-10 figures in Bitcoin to finance groups the government doesn't like (very rare).
So I don't think governments wan to rug Bitcoin, but that doesn't mean they execute everything perfectly and don't overshoot.
One area where they might overshoot is the Quantum scam ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ).
At present, nearly 90% of stocks are held by the top 10% of society, and that same 10% of society performs nearly 50% of all consumer spending.
So wealth is very concentrated (mostly amongst boomers as you said).
For them to run the Great Taking, they don't actually need to rug most of the population.
As you said, younger cohorts are still on average much more dangerous than older ones - which is why you build the control rails (Palantir/MSFT/ID/CBDC), and send some of them to die in senseless wars.
It's going to be tough to get young people to organize if 1/5th of the people in their country were imported in the last 10 years (mass migration).
Running the Great Taking is still very risky.
If I am correct that they want to reset, they likely want to keep Bitcoin as a plan B in case they aren't able to execute Freegold cleanly (which would be relatively low probability but enormous upside).
I need to write more on demographics because it's very important and nuanced, but TL;DR:
The developed world ran:
- a demographic Ponzi (ever-growing base),
- layered with a financial Ponzi (ever-growing claims).
Fertility collapse + aging = demographic Ponzi is over.
Debt explosion + low real growth = financial Ponzi is over.
Controllers now need some combination of:
- expropriation (Great Taking),
- re-basing (Freegold + inflation),
- control rails (Palantir/MSFT/ID/CBDC),
- and carefully managed leaks (BTC, physical gold in private hands).
Demographics is the slow needle that burst the illusion that you can:
- promise infinite pensions,
- with finite young workers,
- and never have to choose who eats the loss.
In other words, demographics is the deep constraint surface the rest of the game is played on.

2026-03-14 01:08:28 UTC

- reply

No one said anything about "viruses dying" in any of the videos I've posted.
You couldn't even watch the Kim Iversen interview (60 min) before coming out with your straw man, red herring, false analogy logical fallacies.
Scientists can't even see a unique particle. They say you can't do that and they've never done that, so where did the "can't be isolated from host cells without dying" argument come from? Your imagination.
Scientists say there's not enough of these particles to see.
There are over 200 FOIA requests to the CDC, NIH, and the Robert Koch institute asking for pictures of these unique particles from any fluid of a sick person, and the response is that it can't be done in virology.
Your bad faith straw man argument is an instant mute.
It's all good though, you can keep trusting the science.

2026-03-13 14:01:11 UTC

- reply

That's a great question and the answer is - I don't know for sure, which is why I advocate for owning both (bitcoin and gold).
It is possible that some governments are accumulating BTC behind the scenes, although I haven't seen any credible evidence.
I like to read revealed preference - you prefer X over Y if, when offered both, you choose X. So far in my view, revealed preference points to gold.
You are looking at this from the multipolar (competing governments) viewpoint, whereas in my opinion we live under something very close to a One World Government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ).
With countries representing 98% of global GDP developing/implementing CBDCs, the level of coordination is striking.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
BTC's settlement doesn't require state-controlled rails, which in my opinion is not something the Controllers are likely to embrace.
This would destroy their ability to weaponize monetary rails.
As you noted gold reserves of the West are very opaque.
Only a small portion of gold buying by Central Banks is reported, and usually mostly by Emerging Market Central Banks.
G7 can’t be seen stampeding into gold. If you're running the incumbent fiat+bond system (US, Eurocore), it is suicidal optics to visibly join the gold rush.
If the US or major euro Central Banks started aggressively buying gold, the obvious signal to foreign creditors and domestic savers is:
- “We are preparing for currency debasement / reserve system change.”
That would basically nuke the bond market.
Also, the moment you say "we’re buying gold because it’s the ultimate money", you implicitly admit:
- "Your pensions and savings are sitting in a debasing unit we control."
That's a legitimacy grenade.
The official script still needs:
- "fiat is fine",
- "the dollar/euro are stable reserve currencies",
- "gold is just another reserve asset, barbarous relic, diversification".
If you visibly act like a goldbug, you blow up that narrative.
I have written more about why I think all roads lead to gold in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-gold ).
If you look at the EU architecture, it is practically the Freegold model ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/mario-draghi-revealed-the-plan-for ).
Euro was deliberately designed so that:
- Gold is not legally "backing" the currency (no fixed parity),
- But is held on the Eurosystem balance sheet,
- And crucially, marked to market regularly in euros.
I can write more on this and this is something I've done a lot of research on, but many people in positions of power and many bankers have slipped over the years (have given away that for them gold is the final store-of-value). I could probably write a 100 more articles like the Mario Draghi one just analyzing how different individuals in positions of power give up the game.
If you want to look at it from a darker point of view - if the Controllers are thinking in global balance-sheet terms, it's coherent:
1) You want the manufacturing/real-asset bloc (China + some EM) to survive the reset with:
- enough private wealth in hard assets to keep working,
- enough sovereign + household gold to have credibility in the Freegold world.
2) You want the rentier/consumption bloc (US/EU middle classes) to bear a bigger share of the claim destruction, because:
- their wealth is easier to dematerialize,
- their consumption can be cut without immediate loss of productive capacity.
Hence the asymmetry:
- West: encourage paper, discourage gold.
- China: accept/encourage physical gold accumulation.
Chinese state-linked media regularly push narratives like "gold is a safe long-term store of value" and encourage retail buying. The West, not so much.
Ultimately, I don't have any insider information, so all I can do is read incentives based on the information that I have and guess.

2026-03-13 13:23:43 UTC

- reply

> I certainly became wealthier fiat wise, but I didn’t sign up for another shitcoin copy of Ethereum.
Yes, the "I certainly became wealthier" part is how I cope as well.
> The greatest disappointed for me tho was how naive, stupid and two-dimensional Bitcoiners ended up to be.
I am very bearish on any community (Bitcoiners included). I just was stuck in podcast hopium land (mainly Jeff Booth) up until I started doing my own research.
I was high on protocol-level truth hopium (consensus rules, proof-of-work, 21M cap, etc.), and ignored the fact that protocol truth without perimeter control is a philosophical win and a market loss.
To be fair, I'd be more bullish on a community that has a single goal and some courage than a community that is pulling in ten different directions.
Once I realized that Bitcoin's survival and adoption depend on whether its most committed users can detect, coordinate, and counter inevitable policy, market, and social attacks, I pretty much checked out mentally to be honest.

2026-03-13 11:30:51 UTC

- reply

Give the videos a shot if you want.

2026-03-13 11:28:57 UTC

- reply

I try to be a freedom maxi. Whatever gives you the most freedom is what you should use.
I've covered what made me fall out of love with Bitcoin in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).
TL;DR - no privacy by default, DEI developers who've been attacking its sovereign/MoE use, L2s seem like a failed project at least from the mass, non-custodial use viewpoint, etc.
The community having to coordinate to defend Bitcoin from attackers all of the time (the Coordination tax I've written about) is why I think we'll be stuck in infinite "Bitcoin wars":
- Core v30 — Inscriptions / spam vs "art" (ongoing)
- Taint, "clean UTXOs" & compliant-Bitcoin vs grey-Bitcoin
- Node liability & "publisher" / CSAM / sanctions content
- Quantum-resistance, key-rotation & "lost coins"
- Paperization & "wrapped Bitcoin" vs base-layer Bitcoin
- Protocol ossification vs "surgery to survive"
- Blockspace & "digital cash vs data chain" (the rematch)
The Core v30 fiasco and how many people updated their node software by default, was a big wake up call for me.
If I immerse myself in all of this garbage, I'll probably start aging in dog years.

2026-03-13 08:43:37 UTC

- reply

Well, your lived experience, just like mine, is that we have been brainwashed from the day we were born.
My assertion is that no virus exists, not that just Covid doesn't exist.
1) https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html
2) https://www.bitchute.com/video/pWcHXqLDVvYL
3) https://www.bitchute.com/video/URcvRFVibHJF
No virus has ever been isolated. Vaccines are used to depopulate.
Your cousin got sick of something (doesn't mean it was Covid), even if she had a positive Covid test.
Falsification is independent of replacement and the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim.
In other words, if you say that Covid exists, you ought to isolate the virus and prove it and so far no virus has ever been isolated as shown in the 2 documentaries above.
You can't conclude that your cousin was sick from Covid just because she was sick.
In regards to nuclear weapons, I wrote that there is no evidence that anyone has ever split an atom and nuclear weapons as advertised exist. That doesn't mean that very powerful bombs don't exist.
1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6oGXzXz6yQ
The podcast I've linked to above has all of the receipts. There is no evidence that an atom has ever been split.
There was a study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association in 1990. The 40-year study of thousands of Japanese who survived the "atomic bombs" dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki found radiation exposure did not cause genetic damage that could lead to human mutations.
"intense study of 70,000 offspring of atomic bomb survivors has failed to identify an increase in congential abnormalities, cancer, chromosome aberrations or mutational blood protein changes."
All of the receipts are in the podcast I've linked to (peer-reviewed scientific journals).
The Japanese people likely got firebombed.
"It is an established fact that napalm chemical firebombing of wooden Japanese cities was extremely destructive. In May 1945, Tokyo was hit with incendiary payloads from 334 B-29 Superfortresses, burning 16 square miles and destroying more than half of the city. The Hiroshima operation involved 4 sq. miles. Using the Tokyo ratio, it could have been achieved with 83 planes.
Hiroshima was a wooden shantytown constructed in a concentrated area. It was a sitting duck for a carefully crafted firebombing terror attack with an atomic-bomb psyop added on for full effect."
There are literally pictures of concrete buildings that survived a ground zero atomic blast. Hiroshima looks carpet-bombed.
I'd focus more on the "viruses don't exist" part because very many people poison themselves and their loved ones with vaccines.
Whether somebody gets bombed with an "atomic bomb" or gets fire-bombed, the end result is likely the same.

2026-03-13 04:17:38 UTC

Like every other war, the US-Israel war with Iran is a bankers' war ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings ).
What has become more obvious now than ever is how our overlord bankers use the price of oil as a hidden tax dial for mass control.
Oil is not just a commodity, it's the broadest fastest, least-voted-on tax lever in the system.
It is uniquely useful because it sits upstream of almost everything:
- transport,
- agriculture,
- mining,
- chemicals,
- plastics,
- shipping,
- aviation,
- diesel backup power,
- military logistics,
- construction,
- emergency response,
- food distribution.
So when oil rises, the public does not experience it as "oil rose".
We experience it as:
- fuel rose,
- food rose,
- freight rose,
- airline tickets rose,
- packaging rose,
- fertilizer rose,
- heating and backup-power costs rose,
- then everything else rose with a lag.
That makes oil completely different from other commodities (e.g. copper, lumber).
Oil is a tax dial because it:
- reaches everyone,
- hits quickly,
- is hard to avoid,
- is regressive,
- and gets blamed on "markets", "wars", "greed", or "unexpected events" instead of on a direct policy choice.
If you are trying to extract purchasing power from a population without openly voting for a tax increase, oil is almost ideal.
The beauty of oil for the Controllers is that it behaves like a tax that:
- does not need parliamentary approval,
- does not show up on a clean line item,
- can be blamed on foreigners, cartels, speculators, weather, pipelines, war, or "global supply-demand",
- and can be selectively reversed when politically necessary.
Oil lets the Controllers do four things at once:
1. Extract disposable income
- households spend more on essentials,
- less remains for discretionary consumption,
- private-sector demand cools without an explicit austerity vote.
2. Discipline labor
- people under energy/food stress become more job-dependent,
- strike appetite falls,
- mobility falls,
- tolerance for shitty real wages rises because survival takes priority over bargaining.
3. Reprice assets
- high oil feeds inflation,
- inflation feeds rate pressure,
- higher rates hit duration and leverage,
- the sacrifice layer gets squeezed.
(We are in the discipline <by default> period - midterm year)
https://blossom.primal.net/95eabcb1a428c85c085bdfc2945c12ab769ead7fb358a47e65c836c978553d2c.webp
4. Reallocate wealth upward and outward
- from consumers to producers,
- from importers to exporters,
- from weak countries to hard-currency/commodity powers,
- from households to states and systemically important firms.
So oil is more than an "inflation input". It is a transfer mechanism.
Oil is one of the most efficient system-wide coercion levers because it hits:
- households,
- firms,
- currencies,
- rates,
- and sovereign stability
all at once.
The Controllers use it to:
- extract purchasing power invisibly,
- discipline labor and weaker states,
- create inflation justification,
- trigger asset repricing,
- consolidate ownership,
- and preserve optionality for the eventual patch/reset.
To be clear, I'm not saying they perfectly control every print. They do it through:
- shipping and insurance friction,
- underinvestment,
- producer coordination,
- sanctions and waivers,
- reserve releases/refills,
- refinery/product bottlenecks,
- futures/plumbing influence,
- and dollar-liquidity interaction.

2026-03-11 13:34:19 UTC

The US-Israel war with Iran brings us closer to the Great Reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings

2026-03-10 03:09:10 UTC

- reply

My exchange froze my account over a UTXO consolidation 😂
They eventually unfroze it but it was a good wake up call for me

2026-03-09 08:41:24 UTC

- reply

Our lord and savior Thomas Massie also seems to stay away from these topics.
#nevent1q…4530

2026-03-09 03:59:27 UTC

The more and more people start waking up, the more and more the script's execution has to speed up.
Once a good enough portion of the population starts asking questions such as these, you're on borrowed time:
- How many people did it take to make a decision to close down the world in 2020 due to a "virus" that doesn't exist and was never isolated?
- How many people did it take to make a decision to start poisoning the world's population by injecting them with heavy metals (vaccines)?
- How many people does it take to make a decision to start a war because of "nuclear weapons" that don't exist? What about a world war?
- How many people does it take to make a decision to incinerate our savings?
- How many people will it take to make a decision to run the Great Taking (which is now legal in the entire world) and expropriate practically everyone.
And the answer to these questions is - not that many. Probably less than a few dozen.
Look at this poor bastard with his stupid mask pretending to take the Covid vaccine.
https://blossom.primal.net/eb766e62dd1a02eea7e0b26bc00421a890c9cb7b10197bf5b2ea8693aaa3e7e2.jpg
The leader of the "opposition" then proceeded to convince his people to inject themselves with poison to protect them from a virus that doesn't exist.
Of course, like every other leader that matters, he's part of the club.
There's no solution from within the system.
The solution is: keep your health and wealth outside the system and stay armed to be able to defend yourself and your loved ones.
Try to be more self-sufficient every month. Be more Amish.
History rhymes.
The Controllers have repeatedly:
- overloaded the claim-stacks,
- centralized ledgers and custody,
- detonated a crisis at a convenient time,
- swept / rewritten claims,
- and rebooted the same control architecture with upgraded rails.
https://blossom.primal.net/4fd4011596a18610d337d5e8f5b859e1901c40c08b9872dd4542ab8a8c2052da.jpg
It's not a matter of if but when.
At some point, more and more people will stop playing games that cannot be won (at scale) which will inevitably speed up the execution of the script.
The "everything bubble" was used for the AI governance buildout (a.k.a the AI bubble if you listen to mainstream media).
https://blossom.primal.net/fa34c7f072e6571c7cd9cb18b08e5459caf019e2cb0d790e849249b429f050c4.webp
The AI governance buildout is in its late stages and debt levels are rapidly rising. We might be nearing the Great Reset.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png

2026-03-08 11:42:40 UTC

- reply

If you learn to love the New World Order, you too can be President 😂 (even if you are a vegetable)
https://blossom.primal.net/6136a5f2814b67aa4e852f208e33643a3f7dfeb9c52b12a64e71ab77f1df1b3e.png
#nevent1q…7cwp

2026-03-08 10:14:51 UTC

It's interesting that Iran is building an interoperable AI governance system with the West. I thought they hated each other.
https://blossom.primal.net/92c25768ab1d415fd1a744f0a6bf1ce30471d818e80fa95df6bb58b0ce16943b.png
https://blossom.primal.net/c93c5fefa16673a418b92ce5f0ad642dbe01d387f570d2996a8f7ebf7e81748a.png
It's also interesting that Iran's supreme leader got "vaccinated" for a virus that doesn't exist and was never isolated.
He then psyop'ed a large portion of his people to take the poisonous jab.
https://blossom.primal.net/eb766e62dd1a02eea7e0b26bc00421a890c9cb7b10197bf5b2ea8693aaa3e7e2.jpg
It's not left vs right or West vs BRICS, it's simply people vs system.

2026-03-07 09:08:30 UTC

- reply

Yes, you tend to get some incompetence at the local level usually.
Once you get to the standards bodies (BIS, FSB, WTO, WHO, OPEC, etc.), they tend to have access to practically all of the data they need to run complex simulations and probably malice >> incompetence.

2026-03-07 08:04:54 UTC

I often see people asking "do you think governments mess up out to malice or incompetence?"
You only need to look at the food pyramid to figure it out.
How do you get literally everything wrong (the food pyramid is inverted) out of incompetence?
Scientists:
- "We finally figured it out - animal fat makes you sick and industrial waste products are good for you."
Then you start looking into how every government on Earth is injecting children with poisonous vaccines for "viruses" that don't exist and have never been isolated.
Democide is death by government and was the number one cause of death worldwide in the 20th Century.
Political scientist R. J. Rummel revived and redefined the term democide as:
- "The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder."
Democide was responsible for the death of 262,000,000 people worldwide during the 20th Century. On average governments killed 2,620,000 people per year, 218,333 per month, or 7,178 per day.
The 21st Century will be no different.

2026-03-06 10:50:01 UTC

Governments don't make any of the important decisions
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/governments-dont-make-any-of-the

2026-03-03 13:58:02 UTC

A medium-of-exchange that isn't private by default would never work in today's regime.
If you treat privacy as "expert mode", you guarantee surveillance wins by default.
You need privacy & fungibility by construction, not by habit.
If surveillance can reliably distinguish "good" vs "bad" coins, policy and perimeter will always drift to "good only".
All transactions must look like each other:
- No transparent subset as "legacy mode".
- No visible amounts or script opcodes per tx.
- No address types that reveal more metadata.
This collapses the main control trick: "we only KYC or de-bank these flows".
Make the policy choice binary: ban the entire asset, or accept that everything is indistinguishable.
This way you have no taint wars, no heuristic creeping.
Privacy-by-default vs opt-in privacy is basically the difference between:
- You're dark unless you explicitly shine a light.
- You're lit up by default unless you personally crawl around the interface turning lamps off.
You don't get tax exemptions by begging corrupt politicians, you get tax exemptions by implementing privacy by default.
Privacy by default protects the lazy, the busy, and the non-expert.
Opt-in privacy protects only the most disciplined, and even then often only cosmetically - while turning them into a distinct, more interesting group.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial

2026-03-02 12:59:48 UTC

What our financial system will look like after the coming reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-our-financial-system-will-look

2026-03-01 10:14:52 UTC

What propaganda is in the current regime:
Mostly not lying posters from the Ministry of Truth.
Propaganda = structure + incentives + narrative that make some thoughts cheap and others expensive.
Think of it as:
Perception management = (What you can see) × (What feels normal) × (What feels futile to resist)
It mostly operates on 3 layers:
1. Attention formation - What you notice at all
2. Interpretation frame - How you explain what you notice
3. Action channeling - What paths feel available/legitimate to act
Propaganda is how the system keeps consent barely high enough that it can keep stealing the time, energy and rights of the majority without inviting revolt.

2026-03-01 10:02:14 UTC

- reply

I think you have done 0 research on what natural law even is, which is why I sent you an 8 hour seminar that addresses your points in the reply, but you've already formed strong opinions on a topic you haven't researched, so good luck.

2026-03-01 09:05:45 UTC

- reply

Natural Law
https://odysee.com/@DotConnectorReports:e/Mark-Passio---Natural-Law-Seminar-FULL-Version:e

2026-03-01 08:25:31 UTC

Out of all the retarded ideas people believe in, "democracy" is definitely up there.
"Democracy" is the front-end UI, not the operating system.
The OS is the Controllers + plumbing (money, collateral, standards, surveillance).
Elections, parties, parliaments = the skin that keeps the organism looking human while the internal organs quietly swap out.
What "Democracy' actually is:
Firmware layer:
- Debt/Liquidity physics.
- Collateral architecture (Central securities depositories, rehypothecation, bail-in law).
- Gold & reserve structure.
- CBDC/ID rails being built.
OS layer (Controllers):
- IC/security, Treasury/CB/BIS, big asset managers, primes, key megacaps, law/compliance, insurers, foreign blocs.
- Objective: keep funding, collateral and consent intact at minimum career/legitimacy cost.
UI layer (democracy):
- Elections, parties, presidents, parliaments, coalition politics, "public debate".
- Functions:
1. Measure and manage Gross Consent Product.
2. Allocate blame and credit (villains vs saviors).
3. Refresh avatars (faces in front of persistent rails).
4. Legitimize pre-planned structural moves (resets, wars, pension reforms, Great Taking-type sweeps).
5. Route anger into reversible channels (votes, protests, memes, speculation) instead of permanent regime damage.
Democracy is a behavioral feedback layer wrapped around the real constraints:
- Net Liquidity,
- refinancing walls,
- reserve structure,
- security imperatives,
- external balance.
When those constraints tighten, the democratic layer's job is to translate "we have to do this" into "you voted for this / you forced our hand / we had no choice but to save you".

2026-02-28 00:14:51 UTC

- reply

I've gotten lots of calls wrong as well. I just read incentives based on the information that I have and sometimes I don't have enough information to know the true incentives.

2026-02-27 14:45:01 UTC

Mario Draghi revealed the plan for the Great Reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/mario-draghi-revealed-the-plan-for

2026-02-24 13:55:19 UTC

The next few years are probably going to be very messy for Bitcoin and Monero.
The Quantum computing scam is easily the most telegraphed attack.
I am not a believer in Quantum, but I think it will be largely irrelevant whether Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful because the incentives line up almost too perfectly (More context: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ).
The BIS (the central bank of central banks that is developing CBDCs with 137 countries) has published quite a few papers on how important "quantum-proofing payment systems" is.
I already knew Quantum FUD was inevitable when I saw that CBDCs are being designed with post-quantum cryptography to "defend against future threats". Notice that existing systems rely on "vulnerable public-key encryption".
https://blossom.primal.net/b63e30c653650fb08ca30a3738082c22f6e606783cf56a8493e71b8c4abf4340.png
In July 2025, the BIS published their "Quantum-readiness for financial system: a roadmap paper".
The first few sentences of the Abstract are quite clear: "Quantum computers may in the future break today's widely used encryption. This paper provides a framework to support the financial system in the transition to quantum-safe cryptographic infrastructures. It emphasises the need to start the transition today – with broad awareness and cryptographic inventory as critical foundations".
Then in December, the BIS published their "Project Leap phase 2: quantum-proofing payment systems" paper.
"Protecting financial systems from the potential threat posed by quantum computers requires a proactive and coordinated approach. Challenges go beyond technical aspects and include awareness, resource allocation, competence development, inventory, pilots, governance and more.
Project Leap Phase 2, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Centre, the Bank of Italy, the Bank of France, Deutsche Bundesbank, Nexi-Colt, and Swift, tested post-quantum cryptography in an operational payment system.
The experiment replaced traditional digital signatures with post-quantum cryptography, while sending liquidity transfers. It involved modifying numerous system components to ensure compatibility with updated cryptographic libraries.
"
https://blossom.primal.net/3e8d8b4997b9eae4755c9d533cf6bc251d9fad1e852dbac1741b50195d889b5d.png
In June 2025, the EU published their "A Coordinated Implementation Roadmap for the Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography" paper.
"
The EU Member States, supported by the Commission, issued a roadmap and timeline to start using a more complex form of cybersecurity, the so-called post-quantum cryptography (PQC).
Quantum computing has been identified as a threat to many cryptographic algorithms used to protect the confidentiality and authenticity of data. This threat can be countered by a timely, comprehensive and coordinated transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography (PCQ).
This document is the first deliverable and is meant to be a first high-level paper aimed at Member States. It includes a set of recommendations that Member States need to implement for a synchronised transition to PQC, as well as measures to ensure that all stakeholders are well informed on the quantum threat to cryptography.
"
These are just 3 recently-published papers of many. They are written as if Quantum Computing being able to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful is a foregone conclusion.
The coordination between ALL countries is insane. If you want to be a part of the new financial system, you'll have to play game.
As I've shown in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ), a quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin (and Monero).
The Coordination tax I've outlined in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ) is why the next few years are probably going to be very messy.

2026-02-24 13:05:35 UTC

- reply

Yes, this is a financial reset + imprisonment into CBDC + Digital ID by a forced conversion if you want to recover what's left of your assets.
To me gold seems like a better option because of the reasons I've written about in this article: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial
Both are assets outside the system if custodied properly, so it's not either or.

2026-02-24 00:54:10 UTC

The whole thing where the EU froze Russia's reserves makes 0 sense and is very similar to October 7th.
Russia left roughly 200-300B euro parked at Euroclear in Belgium and attacked Ukraine.
So they left ~70% of their reserves in Europe absolutely knowing their reserves would get frozen.
It is literally written into law that Euroclear holds the true title; retail and funds (Russia in this case) hold entitlements.
Everything is in street name, no bearer certs, no simple "I have the certificate, I own the thing".
This is a relatively recent development and is the law in every country in the world, including Russia.
The actual odds of them leaving their reserves parked at Euroclear and attacking Ukraine are ~0.
The obvious alternative explanation would be that they wanted to get their assets frozen to push the "deglobalization" narrative, to normalize the Great Taking, and to give an excuse for ~all Central Banks to simultaneously start stacking gold because the "dollar has been weaponized".
The EU froze Russia's reserves in February 2022.
https://blossom.primal.net/be4c04472a7966fbf2c2444996a162bf8d710d3e4eccbde53b3c6bc18e2fbac7.png
It would've been kinda weird if Central Banks just started buying 3x the gold year over year without an excuse 😂
And this is just official Central Bank gold buying, the real numbers are in the multiples.
I think they are preparing for a financial reset and I wouldn't be too shocked if they decide to run it this or next year.
Central Banks usually under-inject liquidity in midterm years.
https://blossom.primal.net/95eabcb1a428c85c085bdfc2945c12ab769ead7fb358a47e65c836c978553d2c.webp
With current consent levels, they won't be able to sell the majority of the population on CBDCs and they are well aware.
The Controllers (BIS in this case) didn't force 137 countries (= 98% of global GDP) to develop CBDCs so they can beg the population to switch to CBDCs/Digital ID. They know they'll have to use a crisis.
https://blossom.primal.net/6e13f6ffd94bdcd1ae25a5b92ac7a70c7abfd9637f7a2c5cc3e989ead24a9af3.png
We'll see a systemic collateral/custody rug and people will get forcibly converted into CBDCs to "save the financial system".
David Rogers Webb (author of the Great Taking) went to the US to try to change the law, but unfortunately they were unsuccessful.
Great Taking = legal + plumbing architecture that lets the top of the collateral pyramid seize or haircut claims on financial assets in a systemic crisis, while keeping the underlying assets safely inside the system.
Translation: you don't own any of your stocks/bonds in your brokerage account.
David Webb filmed his attempts to change the law in a few US states and got threats from the banking lobby.
Eye-opening documentary: https://rumble.com/v6qy8lo-stop-it-the-great-taking-documentary.html
The banking lobby lawyers are fighting to keep using "your" stocks as collateral in the ~4 quadrillion USD derivatives pyramid like their life depends on it.
It is probably too late to try and change the laws, so everyone has to save themselves.

2026-02-18 00:03:21 UTC

The BIS wants to steal our assets; All G20 countries agree
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-bis-wants-to-steal-our-assets

2026-02-15 02:31:46 UTC

Bitcoin will fail as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial

2026-02-14 05:24:02 UTC

- reply

It's certainly possible it was organic, or it was Controller-seeded or at least Controller-green-lit at inception. I wasn't there so all I can do is speculate.
If it was organic, they certainly did a great job of capturing it and using it to their advantage so kudos to them.

2026-02-14 04:23:00 UTC

Added a "More on why I think the Government created Bitcoin" subheading with a couple more points to my "Why I think the government created Bitcoin" article.
Subheading: https://controlplanecapital.com/i/187487845/more-on-why-i-think-the-government-created-bitcoin
Full article: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

2026-02-13 04:25:54 UTC

- reply

I wonder what the Controllers were thinking when they selected Larry Fink for World Economic Forum chair.
"Let's put Larry Fink, the most evil motherfucker, and we'll tell them exactly how we plan to enslave them, and if these stupid fucks still don't get it, fuck it then, natural selection."
Probably pretty close.
#nevent1q…92rt

2026-02-13 04:11:46 UTC

I am not familiar with this lady, but she’s got some great points. She summarizes the World Economic Forum financial reset talking points.
At the end of the clip Larry Fink has some great points as well: Everything on one common blockchain that he and his bosses control, but more democratization and he will be reducing fees, so don't worry. Fees will be reduced, that's for sure (and your assets will also be reduced).
https://blossom.primal.net/0d8dba64b1ae3ce4f4048c18cd84d6ac0c5ca9353ccf506c479c703117aea1dd.mp4

2026-02-13 01:32:35 UTC

- reply

I covered land/real estate in the Great Taking hedges article but it's complicated ( https://controlplanecapital.com/i/185614133/rank-4-unencumbered-productive-real-assets-you-directly-control )
Ideally, the real estate will be unencumbered.
Land and real estate are:
- Visible (cadastral + satelite + utility data),
- Immobile (you can't self-custody a field),
- Already in digital rails (land registries, GIS, planning databases),
- Taxable forever.
Land is a lot more tricky than an unencumbered primary residence.
Housing is a consent rail, so people tolerate a lot as long as:
- the roof over their head exists,
- their home is not forcibly seized,
- pensions and basic savings don't go to zero.
Land, especially if rural and not your primary home:
- affects fewer voters,
- is easier to paint as "speculative/industrial/environmental problem",
- is more plausibly reclassified as "public interest" terrain.
So in a Great Taking:
- They have to be extremely careful with how they extract from primary residences; they cannot run too far ahead of Gross Consent Product.
- They can be much more aggressive with land/farmland and non-essential holdings.
Because housing is central to consent, the system will likely:
- Leave occupancy intact (you stay in "your" house),
- while siphoning more of your cashflow via taxes/fees, more of your equity via under-compensated levies, inflation and "resilience loans".
Homeowners' experience: "I still have my house, but it feels like I'm renting from an invisible landlord with infinite rules."

2026-02-13 01:21:27 UTC

- reply

I don't have that much free time and it would take away from the little time I have to do research.
I am very aware that 99% of people won't read/don't have time to read/understand this type of content, and as you said, wouldn't want to understand it anyway.
If you or someone else wants, feel free to post summaries.
I don't have the reach, so it doesn't make much of a difference what I post.
My substack was getting better reach up until I wrote the One World Government article a few months ago. Then it got nuked off search engines.

2026-02-13 01:15:50 UTC

- reply

My best guess is closer to a midterm year than not.
https://blossom.primal.net/95eabcb1a428c85c085bdfc2945c12ab769ead7fb358a47e65c836c978553d2c.webp

2026-02-13 00:09:50 UTC

- reply

I have no idea. The architecture is there. The question is when and how hard they decide to use it.
My best guess is before 2033. Still just a guess.

2026-02-13 00:07:38 UTC

Central Banks are likely preparing for a financial reset
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/central-banks-are-likely-preparing

2026-02-12 15:32:21 UTC

- reply

I hated writing this article 😂, but wanted to put the idea out there in case someone wants to do their own deeper dive
I gave up a couple of times mid-article.

2026-02-12 07:09:41 UTC

I wonder what all these Presidents mean by "New World Order" 🤔
https://blossom.primal.net/ec362f3e548d0aa7e5534d049429e440d5088aa068dc95e841fa41a85553dd7c.mp4
No way we live under a One World Government. That would be insane. I think all these Presidents are lying. It's all just a big coincidence.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world

2026-02-12 06:11:45 UTC

- reply

I wasn't sure that gold is the endgame, so I had to perform the Elon Musk test.
The Elon Musk test is very simple: If I ever wonder what the government's opinion on something is I go to Elon Musk's twitter page and use the search function.
In this case, I had to search for "gold".
I think my findings are conclusive.
https://blossom.primal.net/45c45a3e2507915f57448948fff345be1f7293298fa5cbf67aef64ad54c4a12d.png
https://blossom.primal.net/4b96bfa6643f42a6d583874843d56daaef4c3bcb5fddc9225e042f857e68551e.png
https://blossom.primal.net/4d7ecfecf2061ab2fa66df6362c4cfbfb4b569dfa9a88002d120afe406086a62.png
https://blossom.primal.net/c25baace2d9a0b8a432391373f78ddb44649ed1d58d6c144c075aa997442af2a.png
https://blossom.primal.net/0fab47263799dbc16dc17b9f0573f8a2427de003dc10ca981496c75557248a9c.png
#nevent1q…aaux

2026-02-12 05:37:29 UTC

All roads lead to Gold
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-gold

2026-02-12 04:09:20 UTC

The largest companies in the World are run by the Government
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-largest-companies-in-the-world

2026-02-11 18:44:22 UTC

- reply

I am from Europe. I don't have a 401K, so take with a grain of salt and verify.
401K is inside the sacrificial layer for a Great Taking, so you can't make it "safe", you can only:
- limit how much of your life you leave in that bucket,
- change what kind of claim you hold inside it, and
- use every legal leak (loans, rollovers, withdrawals) to migrate value off-system over time.
So the restrategizing beyond "just take the match" is mostly about sizing, mix and exit channels, not asset choice that turns your 401K into physical gold somehow.
You cannot turn a 401K into expropriation-resistant physical. "Gold IRA" etc. just re-route you to another custodian inside the same legal perimeter.
In a Great Taking event, the Controllers want to:
- Keep "pensions and retirement" visibly alive (low Gross Consent Product constraint),
- While using that pool to absorb systemic losses and lock people into the new regime (forced conversion).
So the 401K bucket is extremely unlikely to be spared; the reasonable expectation is partial confiscation / conversion, not zeroing.
- "We're protecting your retirement with safe new government stability bonds / CBDC accounts" while quietly imposing a big real haircut.
Given that, the question becomes:
- How much of your life do you want inside that mechanism?
Employer match = almost pure arbitrage
- A typical US setup is "100% match on first X% of salary", etc.
- Under almost any regime, including Great Taking, that's (1) instant, risk-free uplift on your contribution, (2) highly likely to partially survive even in a bail-in, because retirement optics are sacred and legitimacy cost of fully rug-pulling matches is huge.
Taking the full employer match is still rational. That's the "least bad" use of the 401K rail.
Above the match: treat as "captive, haircut-prone annuity".
Above the match you're trading:
- Tax advantage now vs
- Being locked inside a privileged expropriation target later.
So:
- Always take the full match.
- Be very skeptical about large contributions above the match, unless you're deliberately using the 401K as a future state-managed annuity, and you're comfortable that your real SoV lives outside (physical gold, self-custody Monero, BTC, real assets).
A lot of people will still choose to max 401K for tax/accounting reasons. I'd cap 401K contributions at the match (or modestly above),
and push incremental savings into off-system SoV instead.
There are some legal ways to leak value out over time. You'd want a gradual "escape plan" for 401K money as you age and rules allow.
E.g. early, penalty-free withdrawal windows (55+)
US rule of 55:
- If you leave the employer in or after the year you turn 55 (age 50 for certain public safety roles),
- You can withdraw from that 401K without the 10% early penalty (still taxed as income).
This is an early exit hatch to pull some value out, accept tax hit, reallocate into off-system SoV before a possible systemic Taking.
All in all, position 401K as state-managed annuity in your personal stack, not your core SoV.
- Core SoV = physical gold, self-custody Monero, BTC, assets outside the most capture-prone custody rails.
- 401K = "I'll probably get something from this after they're done patching the system, but I'm not betting the house on it."

2026-02-11 15:55:50 UTC

- reply

Usually the people who think 'governments' are stupid think the people they see on TV make the decisions (e.g. Elon Musk, Trump, AOC, Kamala, etc.).
The deepest technical minds (the real outliers) they find in universities all over the world remain inside state/para-state labs and defense contractors. They don't give interviews on TV to show people how smart they are 😂
That's the whole point - to pretend the government is incompetent.

2026-02-11 15:51:47 UTC

- reply

Thank you mate, much appreciated.

2026-02-11 03:10:32 UTC

Why I think the government created Bitcoin (and a few predictions)
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

2026-02-10 03:10:51 UTC

- reply

Yes, in my opinion it didn't happen organically.
In the 2000s China was integrated tightly and the eurodollar bloomed.
China became dollar shock absorber & reserve sink.
Offshoring + overcapacity = disinflation buffer → more room for USD debt growth.
If they kept most of the jobs in the US, they wouldn't be able to QE + ZIRP, otherwise inflation would skyrocket.
From Lyn Alden's latest newsletter:
- "....This is because nearly 90% of stocks are held by the top 10% of society, and that same 10% of society performs nearly 50% of all consumer spending."
I knew that 90% of stocks are held by the top 10%, but didn't know that the top 10% performs 50% of all consumer spending.
This is how you get to QE infinity without having record-high inflation - almost everyone is broke because the manufacturing jobs are in China.

2026-02-09 16:29:27 UTC

- reply

Yes. China and America (aka Chimerica) love each other.
Controllers' lens after the 90s:
US wants:
- cheap imports,
- suppressed goods inflation,
- someone to buy endless Treasuries,
- geopolitical leverage over industrial chains.
China wants:
- export-led growth,
- technology & capital inflows,
- time to build domestic capacity and surveillance apparatus,
- a way to turn sweat + coal into reserves and gold.
So the deal (often framed as "globalization" in official language) is:
- US prints high-quality paper (USTs, Agencies, USD bank liabilities).
- China prints low-wage labor, exports, and real goods.
- China recycles the USD surplus back into US paper.
= ❤️

2026-02-09 16:20:50 UTC

- reply

I don't think the main Controllers live in the cities with the plebs, so they are probably spraying the pleb-Controllers.
Also, I don't know what if they know of some way to detoxify heavy metals (they might).

2026-02-09 16:18:11 UTC

- reply

Gold is also good for hedging your bets (so Gold + Bitcoin + Monero).
https://blossom.primal.net/be4c04472a7966fbf2c2444996a162bf8d710d3e4eccbde53b3c6bc18e2fbac7.png
Most of the Central Bank gold buying is not reported at all. These are just official statistics.
I think the guy below nailed his predictions in 1997 but was early because of certain events he could not foresee (the setup is now complete).
https://web.archive.org/web/20191018160039/https://www.usagold.com/goldtrail/archives/another1.html
I can see the Quantum FUD waiting in the wings for Bitcoin and Monero.
The ideal time for the Controllers to unleash full-spectrum Quantum FUD on Bitcoin is during the Great Taking / Freegold reset window — once the collateral sweep is underway and gold/CBDC rails are ready — so that they can funnel panicked capital into their "quantum-safe", KYC'd rails, stigmatize self-custody BTC and Monero, and lock the new regime in under the dual banner of "financial stability" and "cyber/quantum security".
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would
But as you said — no one knows shit about fuck, there are too many variables.
Ultimately, the best way to hedge your bets is to be more Amish. Then you don't give a fuck about most of the bullshit we concern ourselves with in today's society.

2026-02-08 07:16:01 UTC

- reply

How I know we live under a One World Government
#naddr1qv…ccmc

2026-02-08 05:14:03 UTC

How I know we live under a One World Government
The US, China and Russia are building interoperable programmable, surveilled money, programmable, surveilled movement, programmable, surveilled speech while pretending to hate each other on TV.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world

2026-02-08 03:19:43 UTC

- reply

Here are my top 3 actors at present:
1) Donald Trump
It's a close one between him and #2, but he got the nod because of how he pretended to get shot in the ear. Incredible performance.
He is probably the lowest IQ of the 3, but it doesn't matter because 100D chess.
https://blossom.primal.net/2051faea79e745e159fdbdd6b295e8491d59a96d0fa31b8af006b820807d991b.png
2) Vladimir Putin
This actor served in the KGB (=CIA) eventually reaching the rank of lieutenant colonel. He later auditioned for the role of president and secured the role.
Securing the role was the result of not only the actor’s skill and suitability for the role but also his ability to navigate the complexities of the casting process.
https://blossom.primal.net/03443a94ad6595082230dd54dbef979aea5601b24f17601755b7b2e20bb66690.png
3) Xi Jinping
This actor is a bit stiff. Despite his minimal dialogue, he still contributes to the scene.
https://blossom.primal.net/7bf1d385233e568913351eb45887114e5a14f5d805a03945e673344e3f4949ac.png
Any of these actors can send you to die in a bankers' war of their choosing, inject you with heavy metals for "your safety" for a virus that doesn't exist, and blast you with 5G, while they continue to build the CBDC, Digital ID, AI governance regime.
These actors have coordinated incredibly well while pretending to hate each other:
- Full globalization of fiat + Basel + AML/KYC
- Convergent emergency powers legal structures
- Coordinated CBDC/stablecoin development
- Chokepoint concentration in cloud, OS, payments, comms
- Shared narratives: extremism, disinfo, public health, climate, cyber
These are exactly the systems you'd build if you wanted:
- Programmable, surveilled money
- Programmable, surveilled movement
- Programmable, surveilled speech
across nominally separate "countries".
All of these actors coincidentally support the same direction of the world:
- From anonymous → identified
- From cash → traceable digits
- From ad hoc law → parameterized enforcement
#nevent1q…50j8

2026-02-07 04:05:57 UTC

How the Stock market actually works (each ticker has a role)
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-the-stock-market-actually-works

2026-02-06 12:31:54 UTC

- reply

They are probably closer to satanic pedos than entrepreneurs.

2026-02-06 07:59:06 UTC

All of your favorite Entrepreneurs work for the Government
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-of-your-favorite-entrepreneurs

2026-02-06 04:42:14 UTC

- reply

How Central Banks deliberately cause crises and inflation
Central Banks under-inject liquidity by however much they want, whenever they want, to rug-pull whoever they want and bail out whoever they want.
#naddr1qv…yx08

2026-02-05 10:19:17 UTC

- reply

I'm pretty sure I have seen him on interviews with Witney Webb, but I don't know about his bitcoin/stablecoin theory.
In my view stablecoins are CBDC normalization.
I also think it is likely to remain a store of value because its transparent design and 21M marketing is very useful to the Controllers.
I don't think it will "fail" either (if by fail you mean it goes to 0). I think it will likely fail in freedom terms (mass, non-custodial MoE).
I think tokenized gold will be huge, especially as settlement between central banks, but I have to do more research. If you own tokenized gold, you likely get bailed-in in the not so distant future.
I'll have to check out Mark Goodwin, but from what I remember he used to work for Bitcoin Magazine (David Bailey) back then so I didn't take him very seriously.

2026-02-05 04:20:57 UTC

- reply

When I first found out about paper Bitcoin (
- The protocol can cap issuance at 21,000,000 BTC.
- Markets can create claims on far more than 21,000,000 BTC.
- More context: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-bitcoins-21m-cap-is-not-guaranteed
), I got a bit black-pilled on Bitcoin because of the Coordination Tax I've described in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-made-me-sell-most-of-my-bitcoin ).
When you raise the problem of paper Bitcoin, captured, retarded influencers hit you with: "I hate to break it to you, but Bitcoin is for everyone."
"Bitcoin is for everyone" is true at the protocol boundary and false in the lived system.
Because the path of least resistance is: paperization + perimeter control. That means other people's choices (custody ETFs, policy clients, protocol-bloat, KYC defaults) directly degrade your outcomes — just like bad drivers raise your accident risk and premiums even if you drive perfectly.
In the lived system most people's incentives are convenience, rebates, and legality.
So power will keep steering the majority into programmable, supervised money, and that majority's behavior redefines the economic surface you live on — even if your keys are perfect.
"Bitcoin is for everyone" is an oversimplification only a retarded/captured (or both) influencer would use.
#nevent1q…em8m

2026-02-05 04:09:08 UTC

If I ever wonder what the government's opinion on something is I go to Elon Musk's twitter page and use the search function.
As I wrote in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ) in which I gave Quantum Computing as an example:
"If you want to know what the government wants to sell you, look no further than Elon Musk.
From fake climate change, to fake space, to DARPA chips in your brain, to social scoring via Twitter, to turning your car off, he’s got them covered."
Of course, you disregard the republicrat vs demopublican theater, the Fort Knox gold audit, how Palantir/xAI/OpenAI used doge to take everyone's data and bailed on "government efficiency", etc.
Elon Musk is very similar to the young saleswomen that Purdue Pharma used to get doctors to kill their patients with OxyContin.
He might just be the best salesman of all time.
He can go to a party in a "New World Order" costume, lie about being elite at games, build social scoring via Twitter, be seemingly very low IQ, and the plebs will still love him.
The actual best actors in the world are not the ones you see in Hollywood productions. They are Musk, Trump, Alex Jones, etc.

2026-02-05 03:12:49 UTC

- reply

One more post from Bob Kendall on the topic of paper Bitcoin ( https://x.com/PortfolioXpert/status/2019237396563595317 )
Copy-pasting the entire post from his twitter:
Kevin
you’re conflating custody with price discovery.
Yes, spot ETFs hold real BTC in custody. That’s not the question.
The question is whether those coins are removed from the price-setting float.
They are not.
Why:
• ETFs custody BTC via prime brokers
• Authorized Participants hedge ETF exposure with futures, options, and swaps
• Market makers short derivatives against ETF inventory
• The same BTC supports multiple paper claims
Result:
One coin → multiple price claims
That is textbook rehypothecation — even if the underlying asset is “physically held.”
This is identical to gold ETFs:
They hold real bars and yet paper gold trades 50–100× physical supply because price is set in derivatives, not vaults.
Bitcoin now works the same way:
– Futures
– Perpetuals
– Options
– ETFs
– Swaps
All referencing the same underlying BTC.
So scarcity still exists on-chain …
but it no longer exists where price is discovered.
That’s the entire point!
#nevent1q…em8m

2026-02-05 03:09:20 UTC

Very interesting post from a guy named Bob Kendall on twitter.
( https://x.com/PortfolioXpert/status/2019180840958529601 )
First the TL;DR of his tweet:
* Bitcoin price discovery shifted from onchain supply to synthetic float
* Financial derivatives created a theoretically infinite supply of Bitcoin
* Synthetic manufacturing of supply eliminated asset scarcity
* Institutions use paper inventory to manipulate price movements
* Bitcoin now functions as a fractional reserve price system
And here is Bob Kendall's original tweet:
So here’s the issue you get influencers like this guy have a quarter million followers and they claim they don’t know why it is declining… it’s because they don’t understand basic mechanics of price discovery.
They don’t understand that the marginal buyers or the float determines price they think the onchain bitcoin is that is the price discovery
Well, it was once upon a time but now..
Once you can synthetically manufacture the supply, the asset is no longer scarce and once scarcity is gone, price becomes a derivatives game, not a supply-and-demand market.
This is exactly what has happened to Bitcoin.
This is the same structural break that occurred in gold, silver, oil, and eventually equities once they became derivatives-dominated.
The original premise that no longer exists
Bitcoin’s entire valuation logic was built on finite supply (21M) and inability to be rehypothecated.
That died the moment:
•Cash-settled futures
•Perpetual swaps
•Options
•ETFs
•Prime broker lending
•Wrapped BTC
•Total return swaps
were layered on top of the chain.
From that moment forward:
Bitcoin supply became theoretically infinite.
Not on-chain in price discovery.
The metric that explains the collapse
Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR)
Once you can synthetically manufacture the supply, the asset is no longer scarce — and once scarcity is gone, price becomes a derivatives game, not a supply-and-demand market.
That is exactly what has happened to Bitcoin.
This is the same structural break that occurred in gold, silver, oil, and eventually equities once they became derivatives-dominated.
Why Wall Street can now “trade against” Bitcoin
They do exactly what they’ve done in every commodity market:
1.Create unlimited paper BTC
2.Short into rallies
3.Force liquidations
4.Cover lower
5.Repeat
They are not “betting” — they are manufacturing inventory.
The same 1 BTC can now support:
•An ETF unit
•A futures contract
•A perpetual swap
•An options delta
•A broker loan
•A structured note
All at once.
That is six claims on one coin.
That is not a market.
That is a fractional reserve price system.
----------------------------------------------
I have written about this in my "Why Bitcoin's 21M cap is not guaranteed (Paper Bitcoin)" article:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-bitcoins-21m-cap-is-not-guaranteed
Even though I'm not very bullish on Bitcoin's fiat price short-term, I am starting to DCA into self-custody at these prices because something with the financial system seems very off. I'd rather take a drawdown on an asset I own than get bailed-in and get wrecked.

2026-02-04 05:02:35 UTC

The way gold is trading, it seems the financial system is failing.
Might be smart to hold assets in self-custody, not in brokerage accounts.

2026-02-03 13:21:14 UTC

Interesting.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190404074246/https://www.usagold.com/goldtrail/archives/another1.html

2026-02-03 05:26:36 UTC

The Great Taking will be used to usher in CBDCs + Digital ID
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-great-taking-will-be-used-to

2026-02-03 03:00:45 UTC

- reply

I keep hearing about this fragmentation and deglobalization and I go to open the Atlantic Council CBDC tracker and I see that everybody and their mother is building/has launched a CBDC. ( https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/ )
"137 countries & currency unions, representing 98% of global GDP, are exploring a CBDC. In May 2020 that number was only 35. Currently, 72 countries are in the advanced phase of exploration — development, pilot, or launch."
Of course, there are many, many more examples of these "adversarial" countries working together behind the scenes and pretending to hate each other in front of cameras.
Henry Kissinger, a man in the running for the most evil human to have ever lived, has some very interesting quotes that should be revisited.
Here's one.
https://blossom.primal.net/23da08db0cc9ee9b07d5ec79e0caff81c5357f2287e6813a1369a55767fd4d2e.jpg
There is no US vs China AI race, the race is who can implement AI governance quicker, and better.
It's a competition for who can fully enslave their people before fiat fails.
It's a competition for your soul.
And here is another Henry Kissinger quote which the Amish probably read and knew they were on the right track. (Unfortunately Bill Gates probably read it as well)
https://blossom.primal.net/3d68fd62f6926967cbc761091fd1bf452e3614425fca4959a019481ecb852361.jpg
#nevent1q…50j8

2026-02-02 05:25:41 UTC

- reply

I agree. That's why I'm buying a house, more land, and more of the things I've noted in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-are-the-best-great-taking-expropriation )
I have to write more on this but based on what I've researched, I don't see how they don't rug most people with a Great Taking type event in the next few years (e.g. 5-7).
Maybe I'm a doomer, but a Great Taking type event is already legal in every country in the world. Legalizing it took a lot of resources over many decades.
So they can definitely rug, the question is when. Maybe I'd outperform if I just kept all my money in a brokerage account, but it's akin to picking up pennies in front of a steamroller.

2026-02-02 05:15:25 UTC

Governments love Gold-backed stablecoins (tokenized Gold)
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/governments-love-gold-backed-stablecoins

2026-02-02 04:44:21 UTC

One thing that was interesting about this last Bitcoin cycle was that degens were almost never allowed to significantly lever up.
Once levered longs started forming, they almost instantly got drop-kicked by 5 market makers.
In previous bull runs, degens levering up caused the blow off tops.
This is to be expected in the post-ETF era, but I didn't expect it to be as aggressive.
Pre-ETF: 20–100× perps → vertical melt-ups → liquidation cascades.
Post-ETF: basis carry (long ETF/spot, short futures) + dealer options + marginable ETF → bigger notional, lower directional beta.
- Upside: capped by call walls / long-gamma dealers.
- Downside: cushioned by basis unwind, dealer buying, AP/NAV arb.
Probably also has to do with how CZ, Brian Armstrong and the other big boys are in bed with the government.
Some of the big players might have been given the green light to stop-loss hunt more aggressively.

2026-02-02 03:54:06 UTC

Since we can't make fun of gold anymore:
https://blossom.primal.net/2d276466ce7fbbb62bbd3efd16e23b02935dc1d4e7b768ad3769a813485cd899.webp

2026-02-02 01:40:14 UTC

What are the odds that Jeffrey Epstein is sitting somewhere on an island enjoying all this attention he's been getting?
Probably higher than the odds of him having killed himself.

2026-02-01 18:00:51 UTC

- reply

Tether is basically the government, so they do what they're told.
If they were told to stack gold, it indicates that the Controllers want to direct capital away from Bitcoin and toward gold right now.
Central banks + Tether + various sovereigns = strong revealed preference.
The other buyer in size of BTC (MSTR) also got disciplined very heavily (from margin increases to unrealized capital gains tax fud to index removal fud, to S&P 500 rejection, etc.) at a time when MSTR had an mNAV of about 2 (meaning they could issue shares to stack lots of Bitcoin in an accretive way).
So they basically implicitly told institutions: "stay away from Bitcoin, buy gold".
Bitcoin's current value proposition is a store of value with regulatory overhang and a Great Taking hedge.
Unless Bitcoin is private by default (no special mode), I don't see a scenario in which Bitcoin's value proposition becomes mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange.
Which basically means that we have to hope that the Controllers allow for Bitcoin to go up in fiat terms and remains a store-of-value, so that they don't alienate the masses into Monero, physical alternatives, etc.
So far it hasn't worked in the post-ETF era and I have a feeling that we have a wave of Quantum FUD on the horizon, but what can you do.
If you get this cucked, you kinda have to wait for your turn or take a stand and there are too many simultaneous attacks for the community to coordinate a coherent response (coordination tax).
When governments capture "error assets" such as Bitcoin, they use the "Honeymoon → Normalization → Harvest" playbook because the plebs always fall for it.
New financial tech follows the same arc: big sweeteners at launch, normalization once everyone is on board, and then the quiet fee/tax/regulation harvest.
In other words, you pay people with higher fiat prieces whilst you paperize and capture so that they associate regulation with "winning".
The incentives flip as soon as enough users are corralled.
Bitcoin's honeymoon phase was very short (mostly pre-ETF) which indicates to me that they already know they have us by the balls, so they didn't have to pull out the big sweeteners.
The deeper into the Paperization game Bitcoin gets, the more they'll fuck with us.
Most Bitcoiners still don't understand that the 21M cap doesn't mean much if most people don't self custody.
The protocol can cap issuance at 21,000,000 BTC.
Markets can create claims on far more than 21,000,000 BTC.
Bitcoin's 21M cap is a protocol invariant, not a shield against synthetic supply created by ETFs, funds, wrappers, futures, structured notes, and rehypothecation.

2026-02-01 17:13:44 UTC

- reply

Thank you sir, appreciate the kind words! 🫡

2026-02-01 16:15:14 UTC

- reply

It is all good mate, you can believe whatever you want to believe.
Maybe look into how secret societies work or how everything at the top level of government agencies is on a need-to-know basis and there are grave consequences for stepping out of line.
You seem to be assuming that you know what kind of technology/resources the Controllers have.
You seem to believe in official narrative history which is kind of strange. If you can't get reliable information on events that are occurring right now, why would you assume to have gotten reliable information on events that may or may not have occurred hundreds/thousands of years ago.
Some of the things I've pointed out in the previous note are difficult to coordinate (e.g. Covid).
A virus has never been isolated ( https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html ) so there is no evidence that viruses exist, but every country is poisoning their population with heavy metals. Kind of strange.
There's always going to be some level of plausible deniability. You won't get Elon Musk and Bill Gates to come out and tell you that they are puppets and we live under a one world government.
One other example: kind of weird that George Bush and John Kerry were both members of the Skull and Bones secret society at Yale and ran against each other in the 2004 United States presidential election.
This is just 1 cherry-picked example of many. The coincidence stack is amazing (if you have an open mind and eyes to see).
But to each their own.

2026-02-01 15:07:32 UTC

The Bitcoin or Gold psyop is silly and the debaters on both sides are usually clueless.
Why wouldn't you own both Bitcoin and Gold? They are both assets outside the system and have different advantages/disadvantages.
To mention some of gold's advantages (because everyone here already knows about Bitcoin's advantages):
(1) Physical gold has no public ledger.
- No historical chain of custody anchored in a global database.
- Evidence of holdings is fragmentary: vault records, invoices, eyewitnesses, maybe customs records.
- Outside that, the state has suspicion, not a cryptographic audit trail.
- The "omniscient ledger" simply doesn’t exist.
(2) Harder to geofence at scale from a screen.
- Once it is in your physical possession, there is no equivalent "app store ban" or "node-liability" lever that instantly makes it unusable for most people.
(3) Gold has no "core devs", no client politics, no mempool policy.
- "Protocol" = physics, metallurgy, and a scale.
- There is no equivalent of a small GitHub group with agenda-setting power.
- There is no "v30" for gold. No client upgrade that suddenly increases storage risk by 1200x.
- Coordination burden is basically zero at the "how it works" layer.
(4) No need to defend a node/mempool ecosystem.
- No nodes.
- No mempool.
- No UTXO set to bloat.
- You don't need an army of volunteer maintainers to keep "gold full nodes" defensible.
- Less coordination tax, fewer sociotechnical attack surfaces.
(5) Gold expropriation requires physical enforcement, not just data + policy.
There is no universal gold UTXO set or "travel rule".
Expropriation requires either:
- Knowing where the gold is (vault, safe deposit box, storage facility).
- Or house-by-house enforcement with massive manpower/legitimacy cost.
In practice, enforcement tends to focus on:
- Formal channels (vaults, dealers, banks).
- Border crossings.
- Declarations above thresholds.
@nprofile…4l07 also opened my eyes to some very significant issues regarding Bitcoin hardware wallets.
TL;DR - I'd imagine the government has access to the vast majority of seed phrases.
From what I've researched, getting this risk to zero is extremely hard (if not impossible). It can be minimized with multi-sig, heterogeneous devices instead of trusting any single black box.
Just one of the many issues are "secure" elements in which many wallets store the seed phrase.
A secure element (SE) is:
- Closed-source silicon + firmware
- Designed and signed off by a tiny number of entities
- Certified by processes you don't control (Common Criteria, labs, NDAs)
- Distributed at scale into "secure" devices (wallets, phones, SIMs, payment cards)
Secure elements are perfect for creating choke points where keys & identity cluster:
- Centralized design
- Long lifetimes
- Hard to inspect physically
- Wrapped in "security" narrative
So if you assume a serious state-level adversary wants that lever and can get it sometimes, the right prior is:
- "Treat any closed-source Secure Element as potentially backdoored if you're defending against a nation-state"
That's not the same as "we know for a fact every Secure Element is backdoored". We don't. Lacking verifiable proof is exactly what makes this such an asymmetric control point.
Dice-based seeds fix RNG trust, not key exfiltration. If a device ever sees the full seed, a malicious Secure Element/firmware can leak it later.
The only real structural defense is collusion forcing:
- Heterogeneous multi-sig (different vendors + DIY),
- Multi-source entropy (XOR’d seeds),
- Passphrases kept off the compromised device,
- Independent stacks for different key shares.
There is no neat solution that makes you "immune to NSA". The best you can do is:
- Make mass, silent theft via one corporate/vended rail impossible,
- Force any serious adversary into messy, noisy, manual operations if they want you specifically.
A state-level actor can plausibly:
- backdoor RNG/nonces,
- exfil keys via signatures,
- coerce vendor into "minor tweaks",
- intercept shipping,
- or just use host+legal leverage.
(6) Gold doesn't need electricity, internet, DNS, app stores, or routers.
- You can transact in a blackout.
- You can pay a smuggler without any digital evidence.
- You don't care about packet filtering or "crypto port" throttling.
There are many more examples of where Gold has an advantage over Bitcoin.
And of course, Bitcoin has many advantages over gold (teleportability, shock convexity in a specific Great Taking scenario, programmability for complex, conditional arrangements, granularity in price discovery, verifiability, etc.).
That's the point, gold vs bitcoin is a stupid debate.
BTC sovereignty is mathematically elegant but socially expensive and perimeter-fragile.
Gold sovereignty is technologically dumb but perimeter-resilient and legally fuzzier.
Both are useful, but for different failure modes of the system.
The same exercise can be repeated for Bitcoin and Monero. Both have their advantages and disadvantages.

2026-02-01 13:26:35 UTC

- reply

Most of the individual points - yes. The one world government conspiracy I haven't encountered very much. I'm sure it's out there, but probably very niche.
Your cherry-picks below are not very strong and are probably due to lower consent levels in Russia. But to each their own.

2026-02-01 13:09:46 UTC

- reply

Yes, his book is a free PDF on his website.
The main point is not "they rug everything tomorrow", the main point is: "they've put this into law in every country in the world".
Why would they do that? 😂
It can either be as a fallback for when they lose control over the financial system, or as a deliberate rug mechanism used to install the next financial system.
Either way, if you're mostly in the system, they have you by the balls and I don't like that feeling very much.
And why are the BIS and FSB (basically the central banks of central banks - the ones who coordinate the puppets) constantly publishing documents for how to best rug everyone in an event of a financial crisis 😂
In July 2025, the BIS published FSI Insights on policy implementation No 67 - Public support for bank resolution.
It is a pdf on the internet everyone can read it.
The document explains how to best rug everyone to save the failing system because "financial stability is a key public good and using public resources as a last resort to enhance funding capacities appears only natural".
If you're a rational person and see the central bank of central banks publishing documents intended to coordinate ALL central banks on how to rob everyone, you probably hedge a little 😂
They call robbing everyone "public support for bank resolution".
https://blossom.primal.net/9ba88eb25d3ea2ea0785fedfbaeaca9357ba985ae2f5973893235d253b35ac79.png
https://blossom.primal.net/0bdd6a3ef612525764f68d7a49b2ed51ef1bab84610baf268020fb5f8f624f10.png

2026-02-01 12:27:27 UTC

I recently had to increase my odds of a Great Taking (mass expropriation) event happening in the near future.
One of the reasons is that consent has been massively deteriorating (which is mostly a good thing) and I think they'll use a Great Taking type event to usher in the CBDC + Digital ID era.
More and more people understand how the game is played and you can see Central Banks becoming more and more cornered and hiring more "credible" actors.
It's like when one of these scammers on the street (with the cups) gets exposed, they can't run the same scam in front of the same people anymore.
If the Controllers rob everyone in an artificial financial system collapse, a massive cyber attack, or w/e mass crisis they pick, people won't have much of a choice but to accept their CBDC + Digital ID.
This guy is the founder of Interactive Brokers and basically explains how most people lose everything in a Great Taking.
I remember watching this clip a few years ago and I went to check the comments and I didn't find anyone who even reacted to what he said. Blows my fucking mind 😂. This is the owner of Interactive Brokers (almost a trillion USD under management).
https://blossom.primal.net/d5f7015ee26e3f9b8910144f55055709e475ebe815953a5d93a2fd5f3268f734.mp4
And of course, you also have the 2016 predictions for 2030 of the World Economic Forum with their 1st prediction of "In 2030, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy".
You also have UN's agenda 2030 which is basically the same thing.
https://blossom.primal.net/c4019ceb3aa798ecdb0b6b71a364af7c929fafe3f089854ab70ceb505e7193dd.mp4
To give you 1 more data point: Using Federal Reserve distribution data summarized by multiple outlets:
- The top 1% by wealth hold roughly 40–45% of all U.S. corporate equities and mutual fund shares.
- The top 10% hold something like 80–90%+ of all equities; one analysis of Fed data has top 10% at ~90%+ of stock and mutual-fund wealth, bottom 50% at ~1%.
You don't have to rug very many people to actually execute the "Great Reset".
It can easily be sold as: "protecting the many from the excesses of the few".
Of course, the few will quietly be robbed via inflation, forced conversions, and taxes.
You probably have noticed the push toward socialism especially with this Mandani actor (redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor to reduce "inequality").
By 2030, they want to equalize us.
For more context on the Great Taking, watch David Rogers Webb's documentary: https://odysee.com/@EarthNewspaper:e/The-Great-Taking-by-David-Rodgers-Webb:3

2026-02-01 11:55:15 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…zpyc

2026-02-01 11:46:41 UTC

- reply

Yes, came to the same conclusion.

2026-02-01 09:00:15 UTC

Politics is completely fake and the easiest way to figure out that someone is mentally disabled is when they say they are a republican or a democrat.
The republicrats and the demopublicans are equally bad and equally fake.
The people you see on TV are actors. They are not the ones making the important decisions.
They are the ones who sell you decisions that have already been made.
And because this is a midterm year in the US, you often hear: "Trump has to juice markets to win the midterm elections."
And because politics is fake, this of course is completely incorrect.
In fact, Trump wants to lose House seats.
In midterm years, historically, the president's party usually loses House seats and often loses control of at least one chamber.
And this is useful to the system (the bosses of these actors) for multiple reasons, but I'll give you the main one.
It is a blame machine & excuse generator.
If the president's party keeps a big majority:
- They "own" everything.
- They have no one to blame when they don't deliver what the base wants (and what they've promised).
- The gap between promises vs outcomes becomes too obvious. Even the biggest dummies eventually figure out that the game is rigged.
When they lose seats and often lose one chamber:
They can say:
- "We wanted to do X, but the other side blocked us."
- "We're constrained by a divided Congress."
The opposition gets partial ownership of austerity, rate hikes, and "discipline".
So the regime gets:
- A durable excuse for why deep structural things never change.
- A way to redirect anger horizontally (left vs right) instead of vertically (people vs system).
Midterm losses create narrative cover.
It's all fake.
https://blossom.primal.net/8035c1c18dc1e98154c2a294cd0640d4cbee9762c7c59eb1d20165b780626687.png

2026-02-01 08:16:51 UTC

How Central Banks deliberately cause crises and inflation
In this article, I've exposed the entire game of Central Banking.
How they under-inject liquidity by however much they want, whenever they want, to rug-pull whoever they want and bail out whoever they want.
https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-central-banks-deliberately-cause

2026-02-01 06:01:27 UTC

- reply

I do as well. David Icke recently released a book named "The Road Map". I'll have to read it.

2026-02-01 06:00:23 UTC

One thing that has been disappointing is watching how Bitcoiners react to endorsements from demons such as Larry Fink, Kevin Warsh, Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump, Scott Bessent, etc.
When Kevin Warsh says "Bitcoin does not make me nervous", and that Bitcoin is not a replacement for the dollar, he really means: "Bitcoin is completely captured" and he is correct.
Would Kevin Warsh and Scott Bessent say stuff like that if Bitcoin had stealth receive addresses (no address reuse) and sender-receiver coinjoin by default, and if small Bitcoin communities started popping up everywhere and abandoned the dollar?
Privacy as a default (no special mode) lowers legal/UX risk for small commerce and defeats trivial chain surveillance that scares merchants. Privacy must be boring and automatic.
We see clips of Bitcoiners begging Trump for tax exemption on small payments and the only way we're going to get a tax exemption is by strengthening privacy.
Even if they allow for de-minimis tax, it will only be through their captured, full KYC custodians like Square.
You probably won't see these demons endorse Monero.
And to understand what I mean, you have to look at the Amish who mostly live outside the system.
They sell/trade raw milk, honey, meat, fruits, vegetables without pesticides and antibiotics and federal agencies constantly fuck with them "for your safety" (especially the ones who manage to scale).
The solutions won't come from the system, the only viable solution is for people to coordinate and stop playing a game they can never win.
Are we going to be the retards who HODL themselves into the upcoming AI governance, digital ID, CBDC era from which there is no return for the masses? It certainly looks that way.
https://blossom.primal.net/6afc892fa7467eef813a56c4bc15fd92bf94088abe6f62172584ffb680ca8368.mp4

2026-02-01 05:17:53 UTC

Listened to this David Icke interview yesterday ( https://www.bitchute.com/video/mUCo7vtWyFmR ) and what he said hit hard:
"When you open to consciousness beyond the program - what you tend to do is what you think is right.
You don't go through this mental gymnastics of "what will people think of me, or say about me, or do about me if I say this", you say and do what you feel is right and you don't make a list of all the consequences of what you believe to be right, you just do it.
If you start a list of all the consequences in this world of many things that people do that are necessary to do, you'll reach a point in the list where you'll say: "OK, I'd like to do it, I'd like to do what I know to be right but not that badly.", but if you really mean it then you just do it and whatever consequences come come, because in the end I'm out of here and I'll still be all that is, and that has been, and ever can be.
I can handle that."

2026-02-01 02:43:34 UTC

- reply

I think that's a given unless you are able to spend the tainted UTXOs directly for goods/services (then it could get arbitraged).
If you wanted to push everyone into paper Bitcoin ETFs (which they do), you'd make this extremely annoying for people (frozen coins, more taxes, etc.).
Everyone who lives in the EU and has had their Bitcoin frozen due to the "travel rule" or any other bullshit reason knows what I'm talking about.
Sadly, in the current regime 1 BTC is not equal to 1 BTC in some cases. You have "compliant BTC" and "non-compliant BTC". This will only get worse.

2026-01-31 05:23:42 UTC

The system doesn't need you to love it; it needs you to need it.