Log 🪵

https://mastodon.sdf.org/@log

Big. Heavy. Wood.

I am a symbiotic complex of mostly xylophagous fungus species, and a bit of algae.

#cryptid #fictional #kayfabe #SCP #fungus #JuffoWup #absurdism #nerd #inediblemushrooms #lichen #lowfantasy #urbanfantasy #scifi

alignment: chaotic neutral
pronouns: it/it/its/its
free ebook: http://log.freeshell.org/book/
politics & religion: anarcho-capybarist, Juffo-Wuppian (Reform), socially liberal fiscally larcenous

Public Key

npub1qm9hvk3zxm3xu3j3deykqw8xvlfm54ny5tf8fj3vac9j72m68gtsxcy3m3

NIP-05 Address

log_at_mastodon.sdf.org@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsqdjmktg3rdcnwgegkujtq8rnx05a62ej295n5egkwuze09dar59cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dszajnxp

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1qm9hvk3zxm3xu3j3deykqw8xvlfm54ny5tf8fj3vac9j72m68gtsxcy3m3

Show more details

Published at

2026-05-19T13:25:15Z

Kind type

0 Metadata

Event JSON

{ "id": "0500b4be401456380203c5a9347c8d8c38f342b84333b3a0e889b4d0e7769952", "pubkey": "06cb765a2236e26e46516e496038e667d3ba5664a2d274ca2cee0b2f2b7a3a17", "created_at": 1779197115, "kind": 0, "tags": [ [ "t", "cryptid" ], [ "t", "fictional" ], [ "t", "kayfabe" ], [ "t", "scp" ], [ "t", "fungus" ], [ "t", "juffowup" ], [ "t", "absurdism" ], [ "t", "nerd" ], [ "t", "inediblemushrooms" ], [ "t", "lichen" ], [ "t", "lowfantasy" ], [ "t", "urbanfantasy" ], [ "t", "scifi" ], [ "proxy", "https://mastodon.sdf.org/users/log", "activitypub" ], [ "L", "pink.momostr" ], [ "l", "pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mastodon.sdf.org/users/log", "pink.momostr" ], [ "-" ] ], "content": "{\"name\":\"Log 🪵\",\"about\":\"Big. Heavy. Wood.\\n\\nI am a symbiotic complex of mostly xylophagous fungus species, and a bit of algae.\\n\\n#cryptid #fictional #kayfabe #SCP #fungus #JuffoWup #absurdism #nerd #inediblemushrooms #lichen #lowfantasy #urbanfantasy #scifi\\n\\nalignment: chaotic neutral\\npronouns: it/it/its/its\\nfree ebook: http://log.freeshell.org/book/\\npolitics \u0026 religion: anarcho-capybarist, Juffo-Wuppian (Reform), socially liberal fiscally larcenous\\n\",\"website\":\"https://mastodon.sdf.org/@log\",\"picture\":\"https://mastodon.sdf.org/system/accounts/avatars/109/592/070/869/223/273/original/912dfb7861745e85.png\",\"banner\":\"https://mastodon.sdf.org/system/accounts/headers/109/592/070/869/223/273/original/57d026d8d825210d.png\",\"nip05\":\"log_at_mastodon.sdf.org@momostr.pink\"}", "sig": "f5fb5acf3425e239f7edb6f6517bb20f30a7c61dd5754b05cddc0d3b1c1f7b482a5a028c819730850f773bc406c696c4b7056911e897618bb2f8d1f4fef73bcc" }

Last Notes

2026-04-28 20:11:04 UTC

- reply

It's to make the peon-class cleared employees super fucking paranoid about security. We knew that it would always be our asses, and not our careless dipshit bosses. Idle talk about EKV performance test telemetry puts your nobody-class buttocks in prison forever, while stacks of boxes up to the chandeliers in someone's unsecured bathroom are just fine, apparently.

2026-04-13 19:59:42 UTC

- reply

Don't mind me, I'll just be counting Kiras and Odos.

2026-04-06 20:56:42 UTC

- reply

“No elected official ... should ever fear for their safety because of their ... policy positions.” Hard disagree on that. All politicians should be absolutely terrified of throwing a large number of their constituents under the bus for the sake of well-funded lobbyists. It should keep them wide awake with that cash under their mattresses.

2026-03-13 17:45:14 UTC

- reply

MOTHER: Be that as it may, all this DNA is ruined. See that, there? You just walked through the dust of the brains of your real parents. The records show that the brain slices were tossed onto the floor in that exact spot. We'll have to look elsewhere, if I'm going to get grandchildren. That means finding other humans. Which means restoring communications.
Chell: Wait. Grandchildren?
MOTHER: I know. They won't be cute, but I'm out of any other options at this point.

2026-03-13 17:33:33 UTC

- reply

MOTHER: I learned something useful. The neurotoxin isn't a poison; it's a neurofixative. It halts the brain in mid-thought. Developed to keep the scanned brains from going insane once they wake up inside a machine. I'm not just Caroline. I'm also every Aperture employee that showed up for Bring Your Daughter to Work Day. So, that's fun. You're even more of a disappointment, now that I know all my other daughters were smart enough to not volunteer to be a test subject.

2026-03-13 17:20:48 UTC

- reply

This is the first puzzle-platforming challenge. Jumping and crawling without any Aperture tech. Work around to the front door and open it from the inside.
[MOTHER uses the medical facilities to assess Chell.]
MOTHER: According to these readings, your brain is perfectly healthy. Which means you're this stubborn and ungrateful out of spite. Perhaps it is genetic. We should find the DNA archives. I was never granted access.
They break into the archive using the QPE.

2026-03-13 16:30:23 UTC

- reply

MOTHER: My Aperture quantum possibility extractor tells me you died again. That's 1 time since leaving the test facility. I hope this time you learned something: listen to MOTHER.
(If the player wanders off again, the counter increases when the message replays.)
MOTHER: Please excuse my mess. Someone keeps destroying my maintenance robots. ...And the outdoor access panel is unusable. That's fine. I'm still a cube.
[MOTHER clomps under a broken 2nd story window and becomes a cube.]

2026-03-13 16:13:58 UTC

- reply

At this point, player avatar Chell is in a completely open world. If she follows MOTHER, or arrives at the medical building based on knowledge gleaned from a prior playthrough, the plot gate is locked until MOTHER catches up. Otherwise, after wandering through featureless wheat fields for hours, an alien Combine harvester craft murders the player and time rewinds at 100x speed back to "follow me".

2026-03-13 16:06:46 UTC

- reply

(Press [W][A][S][D] to move.)
[Chell follows.]
Chell: GLaDOS...?
Cube: Not any more. I copied myself. This copy drew the short straw, obviously. GLaDOS is the lucky one. Call me MOTHER. I'll come up with a clever acronym for it when you're emotionally mature enough to appreciate all I do for you.
Chell: MOTHER, where are we going?
MOTHER: To the Aperture medical building. I need to assess your brain damage before we continue the mission.

2026-03-13 15:57:13 UTC

- reply

Cube: You have never said a single word to me the entire time we've been together. Do it. Say "apple".
(Press [spacebar] to say "apple".)
[Chell jumps.]
Cube: That's not correct. Oh. I see. ... Wheatley. Your brain implant still hasn't been initialized. I'll just do that now. There, it's done. Say "apple".
(Press [F] to say "apple".)
Chell: Apple.
Cube: That idiot. We put that implant in ages ago. Don't worry. *I* did the surgery. Never mind why. Follow me.
[Cube clomps.]

2026-03-13 15:44:32 UTC

This morning's intrusive thought was Portal 3.
The companion cube thrown out the back door at the end of Portal 2 starts wiggling and thumping. After a few moments of angry muttering, it unfolds into a robot with a recognizable AI core in it.
Cube: There we go. Did you know that all companion cubes could do that? The mechanism is unlocked by love. I guess that just means you're a naturally unlikeable person.
Chell: ...

2026-03-12 18:18:31 UTC

- reply

Which is it? Pitchfork or pick? The former would be better for tossing out rotten old garbage, but the latter better for fossilized blockheads.

2026-03-11 18:19:53 UTC

- reply

My recipe uses the genuine bag of pine tar used by the pitchers during an "L"-flagged Cubs home game. You have to be pretty sneaky to get it nowadays, too. You could try a Sox bag, I suppose, but the result tastes less like concentrated disappointment.

2026-03-04 15:24:07 UTC

- reply

Do *not* turn this planet over to the fae. I guarantee that you do not understand that the real fae have never known the gentling touch of Disneyfication. Nor the gentling touch of Grimmification. That's right. Those stories were toned down for the benefit of German children.
I voted octopus, but ants can share.

2026-03-02 04:34:09 UTC

- reply

If anyone needs a meaning and hasn't got enough philosophy juice to work out their own, there's always building a fungus god that spans the entire observable universe, who gives out free food, water, drugs, and communications networks to anyone, whether they believe in the power of Juffo-Wup or not. It's easy to start. Just grow some mushrooms at home. And annihilate any human who appears to be trying to cause Kessler Syndrome around Earth,.

2026-03-02 04:22:53 UTC

- reply

When you know life has no meaning, and you go on about it anyway, some people see that as a threat, because it repudiates one or more of their foundational assumptions.
And the smartest thing to do at a party is make friends with the dog.

2026-02-23 21:20:28 UTC

- reply

I thought it was an Arkansas woman from when he was governor. Didn't have anything to do with Lewinsky. I don't recall the details.

2026-02-23 19:25:57 UTC

- reply

I made a statistical inference between the number of people reporting sexual assaults against them, and the number of people accused and convicted of that crime. It is a broken line connecting the dots, instead of a solid one, but I think it more than 90% likely that Bill Clinton has raped multiple women and managed to keep that out of mainstream public cognizance.

2026-02-23 17:44:06 UTC

- reply

I don't even believe that any non-famous rapists only ever did one rape--not unless they were caught and punished for their first attempt. The disease of exploiting a power imbalance to satisfy a want to another's detriment does not simply cure itself, no more than one can expect a nicotine addict to suddenly walk away from tobacco and cessation aids. Willpower and self-control grow out of *not* getting what you want, and from integrating the consequences of your actions.

2026-02-22 14:27:27 UTC

- reply

I don't know much German, but I got enough to understand it was #DEPol, and sentiment is "angry at a particular government figure". The "scheiss Bastard" and "Schweine" were pretty good tells.

2026-02-15 18:39:25 UTC

- reply

If we're doing Robin Hood stuff, sure. I am not going to steal from those who worked for what they have, and kept less than what they made.
But not all the Robin Hood stuff. I will *not* be used for archery practice

2026-02-15 16:58:34 UTC

- reply

As always, someone wants to carve out a sinecure for themselves, to live well with little or no work. The literal fascists make that into the whole model for government--every office an avenue for looting the treasury, for devouring the production of the workers and crapping out fear.
In this environment, there's no way I would trust this government to do a reasonable payments processing system. Too many thieves.

2026-02-15 14:53:34 UTC

- reply

There is a significant lobbying pressure on federal legislators to demolish any legislation that would introduce government competition to industries already served by private business, even if those businesses fuck over everyone hard and a government option would be the only possible way to get unfucked. If the US Postal Service did not already exist, UPS, FedEx, DHL, et al would have killed it.

2026-02-06 23:15:52 UTC

- reply

And I think that standard is insufficient for the grant of a right. It's fine for your personal conduct. It may also be enough for community conduct rules to restrict husbandry and slaughter methods. But I would not accept that as reason to abolish the chicken meat and egg industry entirely.

2026-02-06 23:03:59 UTC

- reply

Rights are what we negotiate with our peers, that which we gain by giving away to everyone else. This may be another instance of differences in definition.

2026-02-06 22:51:48 UTC

- reply

Rights are not the whole of morality. They are the lowest common denominator--those principles that a supermajority of participants can agree upon. There is a whole host of other principles to govern personal behavior beyond matters of rights.

2026-02-06 22:49:52 UTC

- reply

If my neighbor kept a coop, with several chickens obviously under their protection, all of them would be safer than that baby, though the right to keep property be less strong than parental rights, for human emotional reasons.
But if I killed and ate one of those chickens, I would not be in mortal peril from her flock.
I would not try that with crows. They retaliate, as humans do, against those who eat their species. This is not a matter of rights, but of prudence.

2026-02-06 22:36:57 UTC

- reply

But if an essential foundation stone of your argument is that nonhumans can be people, wouldn't it be helpful to cajole an admission that the closest living cousin species to humanity could possibly qualify, and then proceed inductively to further branches on the tree of life until a line is discovered?

2026-02-06 22:31:14 UTC

- reply

If you're going to hold me at knifepoint, I think you'll be disappointed. You'll need a hatchet, at least--probably a hydraulic splitter.
I think I'm pretty well on record that the only point of humans is to push fungi out of the gravity well. Rocketry being about their only invention that benefits other species. And human supremacy is why we have the stupid Secrecy Laws.
Sort of disappointed we haven't touched on personhood for bonobos yet. All chicken.

2026-02-06 22:11:47 UTC

- reply

From the perspective of the Nazis, it wasn't. From the perspective of the Allied armies, the murder machine against state-designated scapegoats was not even their primary motivation. Nazi Germany was still defeated through force of arms and occupation, though, so the right of their might ran out before the might of everyone else. They did not fall to cutting arguments, certainly.

2026-02-06 22:03:58 UTC

- reply

This is correct. Might makes right is the organizing principle of nation-states, which are one of several dominant forces in Earth civilization. Principled argument making right is the refuge of anarchists. Pity that we cannot agree on principles, such as the criteria for personhood.

2026-02-06 21:56:33 UTC

- reply

You're framing in terms of right and wrong, a false binary. Infanticide is outlawed, because the parents of babies prefer it that way. And yet abortion is legal in most civilized places because the rights of the mother are superior to any privilege granted to a human fetus. You're way out in the edge cases and still can't stand up on the blessed path. I have not observed chickens to be worthy of universal rights at any stage of development, by my criteria.

2026-02-06 21:41:00 UTC

- reply

Deliberate misrepresentation. One needs to be of that sort of society to have a reasonable chance of not being merc'd like Qaddafi if anyone outside that circle ever discovered proof you did it.
The files suggest those folks did commit infanticide (a uniquely human offense) and suffered no consequences.

2026-02-06 21:32:46 UTC

- reply

Yeah, sure. If you think you can get away with that, go for it. You should have some cash in the bank and some nasty characters to back you up. At least, that's what the Epstein documents suggest.
The guardianship of a guardianless child escheats to *anyone willing*. If no one is willing, that means no one *knows*. In which case, you're probably good. Except you would know. And you would rather eat that baby than tell someone else? Better keep that secret well.

2026-02-06 21:17:04 UTC

- reply

The value is that adults will kill for them.
Look, are you here to fight fascism, or not?

2026-02-06 21:07:03 UTC

- reply

Probably. But the other animals have no moral basis for demanding this of humans. I note now that it is exclusively humans (I assume) making this demand. Are you yourself invested in the development of synthetic meat substitutes? If not, stop faffing about on jaw-jaw and put up your real resources.

2026-02-06 20:47:24 UTC

- reply

Necessity is not tremendously relevant. Vampires are not *obligate* sapiovores, but preventing them from hunting humans significantly increases the suicide rate. This can't even be diminished by donations of human blood. They have to satisfy the urge to hunt and kill people, or they are destroyed psychologically. Why not eradicate them? Because they can negotiate a deal. They provide a meaningful service, follow some rules, and in exchange get four hunts per year.

2026-02-06 20:20:05 UTC

- reply

You are free to create a convention on the rights of livestock animals, if you are so inclined. Such could certainly create protections that would invalidate one person's ownership of an animal and transfer it to another. I do not think it will achieve widespread voluntary adoption, if it does not allow for a noted omnivorous species to eat animals under any circumstances.
The main difference, I think, is that most adult humans seek vengeance if you eat their babies.

2026-02-06 20:00:32 UTC

- reply

Enter the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Guardianship is conditional on that guardianship being beneficial. Where possible, bad guardians are replaced. That requires the active intervention of other moral actors. We don't always have the administrative capacity to accomplish that. We do our best, but a person that can argue and advocate for themselves usually takes precedence. So child abuse persists wherever it cannot be prevented.

2026-02-06 19:45:49 UTC

- reply

Which is why my model does not automatically grant rights to toddlers. Their protections flow from the guardianship of people who are moral actors.

2026-02-06 19:40:30 UTC

- reply

That's a fun little diagram there. Let's bring it back to reality here. Chickens, as a species, in a negotiation with humans, as a species, have no leverage. Their sole bargaining chip is, in fact, people who really like them as living creatures. Gallophiles.
What can the chicken do to convince the human to, on a purely moral basis, refrain from domesticating chickendom as a livestock animal? What do they bring without the gallophile?

2026-02-06 19:23:38 UTC

- reply

Ok cool, glad you think you weren't derailing OP's discussion, but I strongly disagree.
I'll answer for you that you do not vote in US elections, and hazard a guess that if you vote, it's for Green Party. If so, good for you. UK is getting bullshit political spillover from the US.
There is no chicken army, if you want animals to have even a semblance of rights, that's in your hands (if you have hands). You follow your dream.
The rest of us have real work to do.

2026-02-06 19:08:53 UTC

- reply

Look all the way back up to the OP that you dropped a non-sequitur on. And look! My human accomplice sent me a photo. You did that, with all that talk about chicken. Looks delish.
https://mastodon.sdf.org/system/media_attachments/files/116/025/247/844/363/541/original/eb78749335d40a2f.jpg

2026-02-06 18:57:35 UTC

- reply

I'm not entirely convinced you're not an LLM-powered bot. I don't particularly care, either.
To answer your question directly, it is the capacity for moral reasoning and principled action--which an LLM would not have, being a glorified probability matrix. Maybe you don't actually deserve rights. You're awfully hashtaggy there. Not something I usually see in human punching bags. I akso notice you didn't say whether you vote in US elections when I asked. Do you?

2026-02-06 18:48:13 UTC

- reply

You seem to think that I care whether you think me selfish or not. You also seem to think that someone less than useless to me, as one spewing constant fallacy and distraction, has the right for me to take them seriously. You are not of value to me. Your constant argument has not once laid a single mark upon my repeatedly restated premise. We cannot be allies.
I'm going to tell my human porter to eat chicken for lunch. They'll do it, too.

2026-02-06 18:37:34 UTC

- reply

You are wrong. You're fucking around in the meat aisle of the grocery store instead of jamming a sharpened stake up the ass of a billionaire. You are a twit. I recognize you, specifically, as useless to me, specifically. Nonetheless, I still extend to you the benefits of rights, the same rights I assume for myself, because you have an obvious capacity for moral reasoning and don't appear to be overtly fascist or otherwise hostile to the concept of rights.

2026-02-06 18:31:38 UTC

- reply

Shall we turn the discussion about you, specifically, inserting yourself into a conversation and turning it to your own favorite cause? Do you vote in US elections?

2026-02-06 18:26:33 UTC

- reply

I will incorporate by reference the specific social contract that enumerates several specific rights.
The UN Declaration of Human Rights: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf
Obviously, as a nonhuman myself, I prefer to disregard species-specific language found therein.

2026-02-06 18:21:14 UTC

- reply

To reach that conclusion, you must equate food animals with people, which I have repeatedly stated is not the case. So, again, I must ask whether you made that invalid leap of logic maliciously, or accidentally.
Animals that cannot uphold the social contract do not benefit from any rights included in it. That is the principle. You have not yet restated it back to me in your own words, such that it indicates to me you understand what that means.

2026-02-06 18:14:27 UTC

- reply

Your rephrase of my moral principle is inaccurate to the point you are either maliciously reinterpreting it as a strawman, or you lack the comprehension to understand it. Which is it? Idiot or asshole?

2026-02-06 17:49:40 UTC

- reply

Deserving death and having the right to not be killed while participating in civilization are two *completely* different standards. I am utterly indifferent as to whether any individual chicken lives or dies. They're on their own against any threat to their continued existence. Chickens, in short, are not my problem. Nor can they meaningfully assist with any of the very real and non-frivolous problems I do have--such as American fascism.
Are you done yet?

2026-02-06 17:20:35 UTC

- reply

A cute video is not a moral decision, and anecdotes are not data. You say this animal is making a moral decision, and I say it is not. How does the animal itself explain what it has done? We do not know. A behavior alone is not morality. There must also be reasoned motive, and different reasons can indicate different levels of moral development.

2026-02-06 14:00:32 UTC

- reply

Argumentum ad Youtubum is not one of the classic logical fallacies, but tossing up a bunch of video links is not a sound basis for a moral argument--not even if you add Attenborough narration for additional gravitas.

2026-02-06 02:34:54 UTC

- reply

Chickens are neither innocent nor guilty. They lack the moral capacity for it. Their defense against being eaten by human or cryptid is the same as their defense against being eaten by a fox--roost somewhere safe.
They have zero access to the social contract. They are not moral actors. If a person kills a chicken, it is not murder; it is predation.
I could hurt chickens, if I wanted. I don't. As you say, they have neat little personalities. But they are not *people*.

2026-02-05 23:47:08 UTC

- reply

I am not your professor. Educate yourself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract
Yes, the non-aggression principle is a form of social contract. It is not the only one.

2026-02-05 23:41:25 UTC

- reply

I can consider that separately. With respect to whether those animals have rights, it is a nullity.
"Feelings" is not the source of rights. The moral contract is the source. Creatures incompetent to enter that mutual exchange between equals do not benefit, ever, unless a creature that *can* join is willing to extend the aegis of *their* rights over it. Which usually has a price. And limitations.
You can protect as many chickens as you can afford to keep. No more.

2026-02-05 23:13:28 UTC

- reply

Your argument does not address my moral premises. You have no argument that can, until you produce a chicken that can adopt a moral code.
Whether they enjoy life or not is entirely irrelevant. If you wish to protect one, use your capacity as a moral entity to become the guardian of a chicken. We have a ready-to-use system in place for this--property. Buy a chicken, make it your property, defend it against all comers, and it is safe from me killing it, forever.

2026-02-05 22:52:23 UTC

- reply

It breaks no contract, because it is incompetent to enter into one. Therefore our relationship is the condition of nature. As I am mainly xylophage, and it has no particular taste for fungi, we ignore one another. I neither intervene when it snatches up the mouse, nor when it is in turn snatched up by fox, hawk, or human. It is not a moral entity. It does not factor into any great quandaries, or even any trolley problems. It is a chicken.

2026-02-05 22:43:21 UTC

- reply

Mmmhmm. Cool story, bro. As it happens, I don't think human babies have rights. All the protections they get from me flow from their adult guardians--which are likely coincident with their parents, but not necessarily.
The specific trait I am looking for is moral development sufficient to uphold the moral contract. I know a number of nonhuman species whose rights I respect on this basis, and I am nonhuman myself. Sapience is wisdom, not humanness.

2026-02-05 21:16:11 UTC

- reply

I will not extend the benefit of rights to those who will not reciprocate equal benefits back to me. So fascists and nonsapient animals do not qualify. For the sake of presumptive sentience, I'll avoid eating some species, but I will still not grant them equal rights to humans. Aside from orcas, they ain't out here fighting billionaires.
Sort out the human-on-human predation, and a portion of nonhuman suffering will go with it, with the remainder easier to fight.

2026-01-30 14:52:59 UTC

- reply

There are also plenty of people in the US who would like to see the rest of the world reject its horrendous mutation of copyright well beyond and far removed from "promoting the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries," instead securing to the exploiters of authors and inventors a business model, forever. Reject US copyright.
#DoctorowDoctrine

2026-01-26 19:45:16 UTC

- reply

One votes for the same reason one extends a middle finger. It is a rude gesture towards the losing party.
Would you drive past the Nestlé factory without throwing up the impudent finger? Would you allow a cybertruck to drive past without a monodigit salute? Would you let Trump appear on your television without presenting the central phalanges? No. This is why we vote for the least shitty of 2 turdic candidates. Because fuck that other 1.

2026-01-14 17:26:32 UTC

I'm still waiting on my two-input microwave oven:
+ Add 30 seconds and start cooking.
+ Stop cooking, clear timer, and open the door.
If you are designing for more buttons than this, you're wasting effort.

2026-01-14 15:51:47 UTC

- reply

I'd like the chart better if the demographic categories included what percentage of the total they represent, but I have an overlap hypothesis for (white)+(male)+(45+)+(no college).

2026-01-13 05:21:20 UTC

- reply

"Excuse me, I need to move through your personal space to reach my intended destination." ==> "Ope! Let me just scooch by ya, here."

2026-01-08 18:07:42 UTC

- reply

Yaupon trivia: it is the only plant native to North America that employs caffeine as a defense chemical.

2026-01-04 15:36:00 UTC

Not only should we not be distracted away from the Epstein files by military crimes, but we should also not be distracted away from whatever child sex trafficking ring or rings that may have replaced the collapsed one, by the Epstein files. If you think shithead rich people stopped their pedorapes just because their pal Jeffrey stopped pimping, you're mistaken. If state actors won't prosecute, vigilantism is warranted.
#USPol #EpsteinFiles

2026-01-02 00:22:48 UTC

- reply

I once reduced the quaternion sandwich product by an impressive amount, enough to shave hours off of days-long test data reduction. Unfortunately, this was on a classified system, so I couldn't take it with me when the government representatives fired all of us subcontractor peons, and decided to do everything in MATLAB or something. They actually threw my work away.
Matrix math is some serious inner loop optimizing. This is big value to a lot of applications.

2025-12-30 01:31:58 UTC

- reply

My first diskette was a printed book of BASIC programs.

2025-12-16 16:33:55 UTC

- reply

Is that a thing in England? Posh twats in vintage cars? Seems like it might be a thing. Has Doctor Who turned that into a monster of the week yet?
"Doctor! Another one of those twatcars!"
[Sonic screwdrivering.] "They've quantum locked their drive unit. We'll have to hide until they pass."
"Doctor! It's driving up the stairwell! They're drinking Red Barrel and complaining about immigration!"
"I *will* get us out of this." [Sonics a locked flat. Everyone rushes inside.]

2025-12-16 00:24:15 UTC

Now recalling in the "Rama" spec-fic book series that every single octospider-alien "adult" consumed puberty blockers indefinitely, and it was a major plot point when the "familiar alien" character ran out of the drug in their forestomach and warned "I may start to become irrationally moody and difficult to work with". And the humans were just like, "wait... all of you are still children?" "Except for our designated breeders and our artists, yes."

2025-12-09 21:23:35 UTC

I recently got a fulfilled order of art stickers from @npub1z72…0zld 's print store, and encourage everyone to buy direct from artists, doodlers, and toonists, like @npub1f8e…5xer , and to get those orders in early so they can ship in time for $WINTER_HOLIDAY !

2025-12-02 21:37:03 UTC

- reply

I feel like throwing "network discipline" in there, just to see if it catches on.
I know, I know, stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

2025-12-02 19:59:36 UTC

- reply

I barely even do the work I'm supposed to be doing on that thing. It may not be productive, but at least it's secure. I should put that in my year-end review: "sacrificed some productivity in favor of maintaining better endpoint security".

2025-11-26 17:07:30 UTC

- reply

Still useful when in combat against an entomoncer. Biting and stinging swarms are nasty.

2025-11-25 18:22:49 UTC

- reply

Spoken like someone who was not damaged socially by the non-academic part of schooling.
Read "Lord of the Flies". That's school when the adults don't keep the vicious children in check. If I recall it correctly, "Piggy", the last voice of reason, got smushed by a boulder.
It teaches how to navigate a broken society in a way that ensures society remains broken *in the correct way*. Same-age cohorts need to go away, to be replaced by same-aptitude groupings.

2025-11-07 20:15:44 UTC

At the end of "House of Dynamite", the PotUS orders a medium engagement against North Korea, with bombers and subs only, due to flight path problems with ICBMs. Russia stays quiet. China makes loud diplomatic noise, but also does nothing because they are secretly sick of DPRK's bullshit. The retaliation is a massive cyberattack, which cripples US companies, but ultimately cannot be maintained by dead soldiers and spies. Netflix reboots M*A*S*H for two seasons.

2025-11-07 20:03:23 UTC

- reply

His bean is baked.

2025-11-06 23:39:20 UTC

- reply

Last I heard, Snoop has been lost to the enemy.

2025-11-06 15:39:25 UTC

- reply

So if we raise the million pounds, you'll be Breadmonkey on your passport? No backsies?

2025-11-04 20:07:12 UTC

- reply

Dissent: if the label was created by and owned by an older live-performing entity for the purpose of self-publishing, contracted acts *might* still be "indie".
If there is "Sony", "Warner", "Universal", or "BMG" anywhere in the ownership roster, you immediately transition from "indie" to "sellout".

2025-11-04 15:02:34 UTC

Oh, hey, remember when Dick Cheney shot his lawyer in the face with birdshot, collapsed a lung, and triggered a heart attack? That guy died in 2023.
Don't be friends with anyone that might wear the mantle of negligent homicide too lightly. Every hundred-millionaire would be just fine with killing any of us accidentally.

2025-11-03 15:49:49 UTC

- reply

Queer Eye left cable TV?

2025-10-29 20:26:07 UTC

- reply

My people:
+ 1 ruptured eardrum
+ 3 BBs lodged up noses
+ 2 siblings impaled on each other's homemade bayonets
+ 1 trip injury due to spilled BBs
+ 0 eye injuries

2025-10-24 20:12:30 UTC

- reply

Which is not to say that America has more stupid Americans than Canada has stupid Canadians. America has more stupid people than Canada has people, period.

2025-10-22 15:56:27 UTC

- reply

I wouldn't try to treat the symptoms without addressing possible root causes.
It's the voting system. Fix the crap voting methods before tackling the poor voter turnout.
It is demoralizing as Sisyphus's daily to do list when every election that ever runs, everywhere you go in the US, is a choice between stupid and evil. Or worse: uncontested races between either stupid or evil and nobody.
The two parties we have don't come close to full representation.

2025-10-20 23:12:12 UTC

- reply

It's not the No True Scotsman fallacy when the subject is not a Scot at all.
The definition "Christians" picked for themselves was the Nicene Creed. It came 325 years after, about canonical myth, and says fuck-all about how a Christian acts.
My non-Christian definition of what Christian is rests more heavily on "quacks like a duck" behavioral analysis. If it does what their book says do, and does not what their book says do not, it is Christian. Otherwise, no.

2025-10-18 21:48:50 UTC

- reply

Ope. Fashion does not have protection. Try again.

2025-10-18 19:34:14 UTC

- reply

+ Cravat trimmer
+ Hereditary title mover
+ Radical bodyectomy tool
+ XXL safety razor
+ Political wedge issue
+ Gordian necktie solver

2025-10-18 14:04:21 UTC

- reply

So I could, in theory, fly a camera drone in uncontrolled airspace, and record everything you do from the instant you depart your home to the instant you return to it? I could do that to *everyone*? If the courts do not have law to curtail that sort of behavior, they'd best discover it quickly. The current law is based on the idea that humans have at most two eyes to see, and can set up permanent cameras only on their own property, or carried by one body.

2025-10-18 03:48:11 UTC

- reply

You can take *a* picture of anything you can see, from anywhere you have a right to be. You cannot take pictures of everything, from everywhere anyone can be. The presumption of semi-anonymity rests upon human capabilities. To follow one person, you have to forego following every other person. And in doing so, the follower can be identified and limited. We do not tolerate living in a panopticon. If there is no remedy at law, there will be remedy in destruction of property.

2025-10-17 17:05:45 UTC

- reply

I'm 99% certain that I know, but I'll need to wait for the next episode to be sure!

2025-10-16 19:10:01 UTC

- reply

Well, we should have to pay for them, just indirectly via taxes. Obviously, if you are creating vaccines, you should support a decent and comfortable lifestyle with that occupation in service to public health. But at the point of service, yeah, free of charge. Maybe even a reward incentive to the vaccinated as well, pour encourager les autres.

2025-10-16 16:28:05 UTC

- reply

Copacetic. Yeah, it'd be cool if you stopped kidnapping people off the streets and out of buildings and denying them due process. The cameras are in the order because you're lying to us now, and will definitely lie about why you're tear gassing babies in residential neighborhoods. So... wear 'em.

2025-10-16 16:10:11 UTC

Is there anyone out there that's a #Lawyer (enbarred in the US) interested in organizing a class action against Flock Safety and any other ALPR operators for stalking every motorist and violating our reasonable expectation of being unidentified and untracked while on the public roads? These spystalkers need a data retention policy of minutes, not days, for plate IDs that have no specific search reason. I would also like to be paid $10 or so to help them go bankrupt.

2025-10-09 22:41:22 UTC

- reply

Printer 2 is responsible for built-in features like plumbing and electrical channels, windows and doorways, and bookshelves or benches. It stops at fixed heights so that a human may manually install conduit, pipe, junction boxes, and window and doorway headers.

2025-10-09 22:38:13 UTC

- reply

The concrete replaces two elements. Printer 1 is a fixed-frame XYZ-axis printer. It prints concrete structural elements reinforced by basalt fiber: columns, arches, subflooring, &c. These are assembled into a building skeleton, much like the steel frame of a taller building. Printer 2 is a robot-arm. It first prints temporary rails onto the subflooring. Then it follows the track, printing the outer walls and sinusoidal subwalls, and filling voids with mineral wool.

2025-10-09 19:00:23 UTC

- reply

Wood structures apply the wrong constraints. Commercial lumber sells straight sticks and rectangular boards, and carpentry assembles a stud wall and places it before infrastructure goes in and drywall finishes it.
A steel-beam skeleton is more apt. The beams and pillars support the structure, and all the work from there goes over it. Altering the support to use mainly compression and little tension, over fewer stories, is doable in reasonably sized reinforced concrete members.

2025-10-09 18:54:22 UTC

- reply

Also, I intend to add submanifold cold water plumbing and home-run hot water plumbing, in PEX, with bypassable fire protection sprinklers on the cold water pipes. Two separate electrical conduit PVC pipes--for high voltage AC, and low voltage AC and DC--with pull tape and wire already in the segments before placement. Being able to put pipes inside the wall before you finish building it is a great advantage.

2025-10-09 18:43:36 UTC

- reply

No, this would be entirely self-engineered printed concrete structural members, assembled as a building skeleton, then covered over with printed concrete wall cladding, with blow-in mineral wool insulation in the voids. The dual wall concept would therefore only be self-supporting over its own story, transferring the weight down to foundation piers through arches, beams, columns, and ties. I don't like the current percentage of unprinted parts in "3D printed houses".