Aldo4

Public Key

npub1qldad9txac5nle4dnvq6taaxm7agzesg079fawlrrrftamer4p4qyals4t

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsq0k7kj4nwu2flu6kekqd977ndlw5pvcy8lz57h0333547au36s6spz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsktawye

Publishing to

relay.nostr.bg

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1qldad9txac5nle4dnvq6taaxm7agzesg079fawlrrrftamer4p4qyals4t

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-11-18 01:40:16 UTC

- reply

Indeed. I'm not the "cold, calculating pro-factory" person here...
Improbable has got this back to front.
Utilitarianism 𝘪𝘴 the "non-stop factory approach".
The question of "what is happinness and/or wellbeing" is an unanswered question. Only Utilitarians have claimed to "answer" it "objectively".
However, you can't try to objectively maximize a subjective thing (happiness/wellbeing). This is precisely what Utilitarianism tries to do, and therefore it's no surprise that Utilitarianism at best leads to stagnation of the human condition and at worst leads to totalitarianism.

2025-11-18 01:21:14 UTC

- reply

> "If they can be useful"
This is what I mean, our way of thinking about thoughts is, at present, based on an almost cold utility.
This way of thinking about thoughts is bad. It is not good. It only feels good.
The "reciprocal" nature of it is based on both the "for" and "against" sides being based in Utilitarianism, hence the "loop hell".
Once you break from using Utilitarianism to evaluate your thoughts, things become clearer.

2025-11-18 00:40:52 UTC

The "problem" afflicting the world as a whole is not "immigrants, blacks and browns, trans, gays, libshits etc..." or "the rich, C(r)apitalists (TM), "Fascists", neoliberals and neoconservatives, Nazis etc...", it's not even "thought".
The "problem" is how we 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 about thought.

2025-11-17 01:23:51 UTC

A MAP version of Timeline (2003), where some Antis and Anti-adjacents go back in time to check out their ancestors and to "prove" that Anti ideology has been consistent throughout history, only to find out that all their ancestors were basically Pedos or AAMs.
MAPline.
https://mapsupport.de/system/media_attachments/files/115/562/421/526/329/310/original/718ee68f9269fe1a.jpg

2025-11-15 22:53:07 UTC

- reply

"We support free speech"
...
...
".......Except for Pedophiles/MAPs"

2025-11-15 22:50:42 UTC

- reply

I thought maybe there'd be a PDF (pun intended) but no, it looks like it was totally scrubbed and the only references to it (on the clearnet at least) are from hysterical media outlets.
Probably somewhere on the Darknet, but, you know, like...Obviously it'd be there haha

2025-11-15 22:47:06 UTC

- reply

Hahaha
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/nov/11/amazon-ebooks-paedophiles-guide

2025-11-15 22:30:29 UTC

- reply

Sargon of Akkad "have you even read Locke?" meme but it's "have you even read Phillip Greaves?"
https://mapsupport.de/system/media_attachments/files/115/556/076/879/199/906/original/3b79cc23cee5bd57.jpg

2025-11-15 22:25:29 UTC

- reply

😎
https://mapsupport.de/system/media_attachments/files/115/556/058/420/039/885/original/8ed9169d31c3657e.jpg

2025-11-13 14:01:52 UTC

You can't be a "MAP" while saying that your sexuality/orientation is a "psychological disorder" that can be "treated". I mean, imagine hating yourself so much that you internalize being called "mentally unwell".
The very fact that you use that term signifies that you are pro-System and 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪 MAP.
There is nothing psychologically wrong with being a MAP. Nothing.
Check yourself before you wreck yourself.

2025-11-12 23:06:38 UTC

If you preface or buttress your argument by citing "the law(s)", then you reveal that your argument is bunk because it can't stand on its own.
What's doubly ironic about the whole thing is that practically everyone can agree that "the law(s)" today are utter shit, and either don't make any sense whatsoever, aren't enforced at all, aren't enforced well enough, or are selectively enforced leading to two-tier legal systems.
Why rely on such a decrepit construction? If you rely on "the law(s)" you will invariably be disappointed the majority of the time.
And this is, of course, setting aside the 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵 that "the law(s)" can 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦.

2025-11-08 00:21:04 UTC

Every person who gets arrested for a victimless crime, every person who takes their own life, every person who loses their friends or family for being brave enough to tell them about how they really feel, everyone who gets doxxed, everyone who gets threatened with violence for existing, everyone who is forced away out of fear, everyone who loses opportunities because of what they've said...
...I'm not going to sit here and say "it gets better" or some sentimental lie like that.
No. It'll get worse before it gets better, as the idiom goes...
All I can say is that I try my hardest to remember everyone who is lost along the way, for posterity's sake.
As long as their memory lives on, they are immortal.
One day, people will understand.

2025-11-07 11:33:38 UTC

- reply

check for Covid.

2025-11-03 23:07:04 UTC

It's all "I'm against more punitive justice" until Pedos/MAPs come into the picture.
Pedos/MAPs are the exception to practically every "rule" or "norm" that governs "polite society".
For them, it's guilty until proven innocent, punish them severely for existing, no speech, no rights, no organizing, no due process, vigilantism is condoned, witch hunts, hysteria, medical torture, sanctioning treating people as an underclass with little to no social mobility etc... etc...
There are two ways of looking at this:
"The rules don't apply to me" :(
"The rules don't apply to me" :)

2025-10-28 18:35:12 UTC

- reply

if the "normies" want to jork it to AI slop, fine.
But us "high culture" enthusiasts will never see AI porn as equal to that made by a real person.

2025-10-28 18:25:13 UTC

- reply

fair enough.
It's just the name reminds me of "StopItNow!" which is about as Anti as they come.
Plus, I'm not one to engage in overly defensive tactics, which I assume they are inclined to do (seeing as they are allowed to be public, more or less).

2025-10-28 18:13:01 UTC

- reply

OK, fine, I just don't like 'em.

2025-10-28 15:30:45 UTC

You'll never be truly "free" if you let System gaslighting convince you that every "law" in place is good.
This same logic would have led to people defending slavery, being against civil rights, being against women having the right to vote, being against gay rights etc...
All those changes were brought about by brave people changing society by 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 engaging in (what was at that time considered) "crime".
Being a strict "legalist" is what The System 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 from you.
B4UACT, Prostasia, VirPed etc... etc...
All these organizations are 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵. They offer no prospect of freedom for their followers, only the 𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 of freedom.
This doesn't mean you have to be against 𝘢𝘭𝘭 law(s), but that you should think for yourself and be brave enough to challenge injustice when you see it.
Unjust laws should not be followed. In fact, they shouldn't just not be followed. Ideally, they should be outright opposed openly.
https://mapsupport.de/system/media_attachments/files/115/452/502/605/410/602/original/6e460694baa3f10d.png

2025-10-28 13:20:41 UTC

Daily reminder that the case in question was basically one of statuatory rape, not actual rape.
Also, daily reminder that Continentals > Anglos.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly9z3r1dmzo