forza4galicia

But if you want to continue talking about that, you need to compare what you define “left” with what is really “left”, and even if that terminology is really valid or not in politics.

2025-06-21 00:33:49 UTC

- reply

What I am saying is not only an statement, is an argument.

2025-06-21 00:31:55 UTC

- reply

Left is equitative, then left is never “far-left” because is never extremist.

2025-06-21 00:10:20 UTC

- reply

You are not responding nothing…and you are no giving only a clue that you have any argument that substantiate what you are writing here.

2025-06-20 23:57:21 UTC

- reply

Laughing = lack of arguments. Ok.

2025-06-20 23:52:47 UTC

- reply

Yes, where far-left were not defined by them, then, far-left remains nonexistent

2025-06-20 23:41:11 UTC

- reply

You are who have a very low literacy rate, and even lower thinking rate. That you read something in a book doesn’t mean that that statement was valid or true.

2025-06-20 23:38:26 UTC

- reply

You remain saying nonsense non-arguments. No, Bluesky is not far left, because far left doesn’t exists. Left wing never is extremist because all extremism is in right-wing and far-right-wing that are all forms of elitism like nazism and fascism.
You have any arguments because you can’t say anything with minimum coherence if you believe in the existence of ‘far-left-wing’.
And your last question demonstrates your total fault of arguments of coherence.

2025-06-20 23:24:44 UTC

- reply

Donald J. Trump = Enslavement like never humanity has suffer in history. Please, start thinking by yourself.

2025-06-20 23:22:45 UTC

- reply

You have not argument against I said, and because of that you have not other resource that try to insult me (without success, i should say).

2025-06-16 23:21:07 UTC

- reply

Far left doesn’t exist. The only extremist group is far-right.

2025-06-14 15:03:07 UTC

- reply

You remain having no argument about what you are saying…

2025-06-14 15:00:49 UTC

- reply

What you call “leftists” , generally are right when they talk. You not. And not: bluesky is not “leftist” even.

2025-06-14 14:41:50 UTC

- reply

In Anarchism are not specific rulers, because rules or common agreements about behaviour are done among all community, and even among communities, in a true articulation of all humanity.

2025-06-13 22:48:03 UTC

- reply

That is not seditious. Federal Judge is saying Trump has no electoral powers (like he has not) and that he is trying to simulate he is doing anything that he cannot do because constitution is doing by itself. Then, that executive order is totally invalid. The federal judge block is totally correct.

2025-06-13 22:43:44 UTC

- reply

That is totally false. Trump get worse all of them. But Trump is out of control, even out of self control, and now Trump is a threat for all US people, even himself.

2025-05-07 21:38:05 UTC

- reply

Fascism is not any form of socialism. International socialism is the one and only socialism. Socialism is ever better than other systems, except communism (that is really the last or almost last evolution of socialism.
You don’t understand property. Private property is unnecesary. And Communism lets personal/familiar property. The difference? Private property was made in order to private of property most of the world population, when personal/familiar property in communism lets properties for all.

2025-04-08 01:11:22 UTC

- reply

No tale speaks for itself, and references are totally refutable. Even, they are totally fake.

2025-04-08 01:10:34 UTC

- reply

Collective authority is never forced. You really read books and references with fake claims.

2025-04-08 01:09:54 UTC

- reply

Fascism is the opposite of socialism, fascism embraces individualism and attack collectivization, because collectivization implies power collectivization (all people takes part on government decisions), then… fascism is totally the opposite of socialism. In fact, socialism is never “national” then “national” and “socialism” opposes forming an oxymoron, then: something that is really impossible to exist or , even, to be.

2025-04-07 22:53:10 UTC

- reply

And fascism is the same of “conservadurism”, are things that are in the same page. Only elitism is authoritarian. And freedom is only on the elitism/“right-wing”/conservadurism=fascism side.

2025-04-07 22:50:49 UTC

- reply

All in that book are totally refutable.

2025-04-07 22:50:09 UTC

- reply

Nope: Anarchists collectivize and distribute all. One form of collectivize is distribute wealth. Power concentrated is right-wing/elitism, and power distributed is left-wing/pro-equitativity-movement.
Then, Anarchists are left-wing, and anarchocapitalists is an oxymoron, that is: union of two words that oppose one to the other, then its meaning is totally impossible.

2025-04-06 20:18:48 UTC

- reply

You are really saying all wrong: Anarchism is on the left of communism. What you put on the right is on the left and is red, and all you put on the left is authoritarian, “blue” and avoids freedom

2024-12-29 01:41:54 UTC

- reply

Real left (pro-equitativity) is truth. Real “right” (elitism) is always false claims.