Uen

https://fedi.yesmap.net/@Uen

Public Key

npub1csctzr5tqd7dsw6aw5mk6zedjwxfkekrev2fha72a43nwt2twp3qnpup5c

NIP-05 Address

uen_at_fedi.yesmap.net@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsvgv93p69sxlxc8dwh2dmdpvke8rymvmpuk9ym7l9w6ceh949hqcsprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmntqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2qg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucn8lvevpy

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

nostr.wine

relay.nostr.bg

Author Public Key

npub1csctzr5tqd7dsw6aw5mk6zedjwxfkekrev2fha72a43nwt2twp3qnpup5c

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-03-13 19:09:20 UTC

- reply

The "comradely thing to do" is to be honest instead of lying.
1) Nowhere in the rules does it state or imply that ethnonationalism in any form is prohibited on this instance.
I've expressed such sentiments for a period of time, and you've had no issue with it until it caused a bit of noise on another instance.
2) I did not in fact "identify as a nationalist socialist" - I said that I am one *by pedi's standards*. The bar for being labeled a "Nazi" is quite low even in general, let alone on pedi.
3) Even if I did unironically identify as nationalist socialist, it still wouldn't be in violation of any rule. Your moderation policy is neither clear or consistent.
It's especially ironic because you have no issue with a literal Stalinist apologist in this very thread, but somehow ethnonationalism is "too far" lol.

2025-02-12 22:10:51 UTC

- reply

>"well your argument of competition isn't completely true"
It was literally my argument, retard, Lox just quoted it.
>"Muh patriarchy, commodifying view on w*men"
Boo hoo. So what?
I can view others however I want, you dumb retard. You don't get to police others' thoughts with your disgusting humanist morality.

2025-02-11 11:41:31 UTC

- reply

Feminists were the ones who pushed the age of consent laws in the first place. Because they don't want to compete with the beauty of teenagers. Same as they don't want to compete with porn, which is why they constantly whine about it and want to ban it - it reduces their value.
But not onlyfans, mind you, because it empowers them, while letting them cuck the incels they hate and want to humiliate. They simply hate everything that benefits men. Because that's what feminism is.
Feminism by definition is a pro-female, and consequently anti-male ideology. It's literally in the name.
You're a woke phaggot. You support feminism, which is inherently misandrist, yet you say misogyny is bad. You oppose patriarchy, yet you're completely fine with the global gynocracy and hypergamy.
Foids get special treatment in myriad of ways, yet they constantly act like they're victims. Even the cuckservatives' obsession with marriage benefits exclusively foids. Because that's what the marriage institution is - a safety net for females to not be thrown away once their attractiveness withers.

2024-11-21 18:29:58 UTC

- reply

Just in case, do you consider this as "explicit content" https://fedi.yesmap.net/@Uen/113514723080700373
I don't like nude stuff, so I'd never post it regardless. I enjoy depictions of physical contact. Hugs, kisses, waist grabs like in the post I just linked, etc.
It is my understanding that frequent posting of any entertainment media is prohibited, but occasional posting is allowed.
So I wonder whether this kind of media that I particularly enjoy (clothed boys touching clothed taller girls) is allowed.

2024-10-01 21:05:24 UTC

- reply

https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/234/196/652/583/982/original/8513f90e051647d0.png

2024-10-01 03:53:42 UTC

- reply

Would be a goddess if her tits were less saggy.

2024-10-01 03:20:24 UTC

uen archive 0016
https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/230/008/732/525/416/original/a74790b30a8562f2.png

2024-09-29 03:04:53 UTC

Hero
https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/218/622/998/128/596/original/f66b3cd9058fc6b5.png

2024-09-28 20:44:24 UTC

- reply

Let's just agree to disagree. I'm an ancap, not a nazi. (love their uniforms tho)
I like maledom, it's very hot, but IRL I can only support it if there's an objective consent.
For example, if a girl is in debt, and creditor offers her a deal where she becomes his sex slave on xyz conditions, in exchange for clearing her debt, and she accepts - then I have no issue with it, because she consents. Her feelings are irrelevant to me.
But I won't support aggression. Ever.

2024-09-28 20:15:46 UTC

- reply

>a feminist
If she's a feminist - then a VERY mild one. She literally liked this hornypost about maledom. A feminist would instantly begin to whine about "misogyny".
>He*, it's a dude
I don't deny reality. I just want to be open-minded and respectful as gratitude towards people who are open-minded and respectful towards me.

2024-09-28 19:53:38 UTC

- reply

>screw eepy.
I like Rae a lot. She seem like a very cool, composed, and open minded person.

2024-09-28 19:46:23 UTC

- reply

I mean.. I already did. Yesterday I think.
A technical issue I guess?

2024-09-28 19:32:31 UTC

- reply

It seems that your instance is defederated from eepy.express, so I can't reply to you from there. So I'll do it from this account.
>Also goes hand in hand with super human yandere girls who fall for and submit to low caste men.
Yes-yes-yes-yes! 💯
But I prefer when the girl is reluctant and annoyed, but submits to a shota out of necessity. 🥰
She eventually begins to like the relationship she has with him, but it's not like she had any choice. 😎

2024-09-28 01:07:35 UTC

- reply

Generally speaking, those whom I wouldn't want to be judged by are also those I don't consider as "people".
Btw, in monarchy you wouldn't be judged by the king, but by vassals of his vassals. Lots of corruption would be involved.

2024-09-27 22:37:06 UTC

- reply

>Even in ancap, if the community deems you to be criminal by mistake, you can still get unjustly punished.
Yes, that can happen. Although it's worth noting that in ancap the only "crime" is aggression.
I never claimed that can't happen. But at least it will be a result of each individual bystander misunderstanding your situation and making their own judgements, rather than a centralized entity deciding so for everyone.

2024-09-27 22:13:47 UTC

- reply

It doesn't matter how pro-gun you are, you're still going to jail if bureaucrats decide you went "too far" during self-defense, which they very often do.
Monopolies exist because corporations are in bed with the state. The latter does not limit the former. Intellectual property laws is the biggest competition killer, and who made them up? Who enforces them?

2024-09-27 21:42:25 UTC

- reply

>Japan(90% conviction rates by prosecutors)
And R8ssia has 99.9% conviction rate by prosecutors. How is that a good thing?
>dealing with crime
This video wasn't about "dealing with crime". It's about your capacity to defend yourself.
I sent you a 2-minute clip, because it's an argument. And you haven't addressed it, at all.
You said that you want private property respected. Yet your right to defend your property is constantly being violated by the state.

2024-09-27 21:17:55 UTC

- reply

https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/211/578/838/303/388/original/ebea9197f68af67d.mp4

2024-09-27 19:45:41 UTC

- reply

State violates private property.

2024-09-27 18:46:38 UTC

https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/211/001/489/656/996/original/63b46673414c31f1.jpg

2024-09-26 17:14:46 UTC

uen archive 0013
https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/204/978/086/116/835/original/6f90cc00a1511201.png

2024-09-11 16:17:04 UTC

- reply

Thanks, I'm very proud of it.

2024-09-11 16:02:24 UTC

- reply

I don't like editing cuz it leaves ugly (*) mark, so I use "delete and redraft".
Apparently you sent ur reply within a short window of it resending, and it caused a bug.

2024-09-11 15:58:33 UTC

- reply

Keep your subjective delusions to yourself.

2024-09-11 15:58:06 UTC

- reply

If a merchant who's trying to sell me a sword claims that it's not a sword, but a functional sculpture of a sword with some magical property of "divine art" which he can not rationally explain, and claims that it therefore costs twice the average price - I would tell that merchant to go f**k himself with his "functional sculpture", and go to other sword merchants, until I find one who calls their product what it objectively is, and doesn't try to bullshit me with mysticism.

2024-09-11 14:34:25 UTC

- reply

You are talking about magic, not abstract concepts. Abstract concepts can be defined. Claiming opposite is ridiculous. A word is meaningless if no one knows what it means.
Beauty being subjective is irrelevant, because so is a thing being considered "art" - it's subjective, no matter what shamgic it supposedly has according to it's producer.
In the end "artists" are just selling their products like everyone else - for money, attention, praise, status, good emotions, etc.

2024-09-10 21:23:00 UTC

- reply

>bad reading comprehension
You claimed that whether a thing is "art" is determined by whether or not it's producer intended it to be art.
That claim is non-sensical, as it does not define what "art" is in the first place. "X is whatever I intend to be X" does not define X.
And besides, it's all subjectve:
Just as you claim that intent defines art/not art status, I can similarly claim that beauty defines art/not art status.

2024-09-10 20:35:51 UTC

- reply

An image is meant to be looked at.
A video game is meant to be played.
A toilet is meant to be sit on.
A gun is meant to shoot.
I don't know what fundamental difference you claim to see here, but I very much don't.

2024-09-10 19:31:12 UTC

- reply

>hot take: everything is art
Even hotter take: nothing is art.
"Art" is just a word people use to mystify something objective, make it feel special and noble, and inflate it's value.
A drawing is a product.
A photo is a product.
A video is a product.
A video game is a product.
A piece of music is a product.
Some products are just better aesthetically.

2024-08-01 15:48:42 UTC

- reply

are these two bots?