Judges threaten America - Mike

Congress is still 175 House RINOS and 48 whores in Senate. Enemies of the people.

Public Key

npub1c2v5ld63m8uj0cxy4ufvrg0uez3mgjsaghj7lp4ec7x4cn7llxyqff4u7h

NIP-05 Address

GetsGreased@freeatlantis-com.mostr.pub

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsv9x20kagan7f8urz27ykp587v3ga5fgw5te00s6uu0r2ufl0lnzqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43qgmkfdn

Publishing to

relay.ditto.pub

Author Public Key

npub1c2v5ld63m8uj0cxy4ufvrg0uez3mgjsaghj7lp4ec7x4cn7llxyqff4u7h

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-04-11 22:58:16 UTC

If you've seen my confused reaction to events, I will admit that things have got me messed up.
As a career aerospace engineer this world is not fitting into a nice box of understanding. And while I acknowledge the "We win in the End", and "Trust Trump", it's very difficult for me to do so without an understanding that things make sense.
I would recommend people look at my last two Substacks. There's nothing in it for me. They're free. But they define the context I'm living in today.

2026-04-10 23:31:53 UTC

If a friend came to you, who you've supported for years, and was suddenly to announce to you and everyone around you that you were an idiot, third rate, and generally unworthy of friendship and treasonous, how would you react?
Donald Trump's tirade against Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones yesterday was so outrageous, but it didn't stop there.
He was indirectly attacking and ridiculing me, because I support those people. I support the questions they ask.
I'm done!

2026-03-24 19:25:41 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…3u6l
Boy, a lot of absolutes there that seem iffy at best.
"permitted to testify"? If he were to testify that an investigation of foreign involvement was squashed?
It's moot since his Defense team is unlikely to want to make waves.
As the Director of Counter-Terrorism I think what and what he didn't have access to is pretty speculative, isn't it?
As for John Kerry, his record IN VIETNAM was exposed long ago, as well as his betrayal of soldiers once he returned.
@nprofile…ypnk @nprofile…a7n2

2026-03-24 19:09:27 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…3u6l
If Joe Kent is indicted, or called as a witness in court, his NDAs are moot. If he has evidence to back his claims, he can reveal it if it's not classified.
That's why they'll never indict him or allow him to be part of the Tyler Robinson defense.
On a side note, I have a really hard time taking anyone seriously attacking his character or integrity. 11 tours served. Wife killed in war. Stepped up to be part of Trump's govt.
That counts for something!
@nprofile…ypnk @nprofile…a7n2

2026-03-24 19:06:06 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…ypnk
The trial is already underway. With a Defense team that was selected by the Prosecutor's Office in Utah.
The Feds are staying out of it completely. Despite who was assassinated, they're leaving it to a local Utah courtroom and public defenders.
@nprofile…a7n2

2026-03-24 17:33:29 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…a7n2
Kent has said repeatedly that he was stopped from investigating leads in the Charlie Kirk assassination. Specifically foreign influence possibilities.
How would that testimony affect the Tyler Robinson case? Should a jury hear how the United States government prevented the investigation?
Remember, Joe Kent would be cross-examined with such testimony.
Is he lying?
Or is there more to this story?
Oh, and any NDA Joe Kent signed does not silence him in a criminal case.

2026-03-17 00:06:47 UTC

Remember not too long ago the battle over Trump appointees?
Oh, we got to get Pete Hegseth. He's our guy. The Democrats hate him so he's our guy.
We need Pam Bondi and Kash Patel, because the Democrats hate them. Desperate not to allow them confirmed.
Marco Rubio. What a great talker. So smart. Got to have him. Trump wants him; Democrats hate him.
Where were they all when Netanyahu was coercing Trump to start a war?
Covering up Epstein files? Pushing an absurd assassination story?

2026-03-16 23:59:07 UTC

I'm not sure whether the smartest Zionist has Ben Shapiro or Mark Levin.
Let's just call it a tie.
They're both monsters.

2026-03-16 18:10:57 UTC

If you've ever played DCS, or watched simulations in DCS demonstrating large conflicts, you learn pretty quickly that while technology is certainly important, technology isn't enough in the attrition that occurs between missile launches and interceptors.
When you're interceptors run out, your toast.
Now America's policy used to be quality over quantity when it came to aircraft because of high kill ratios.
But missiles and interceptors are one to one. And cluster warheads change the game.

2026-03-15 17:30:14 UTC

I'm a numbers guy so I asked Grok to compare Hamas and Israel in total carnage.
Eye for an eye?
Deaths:
Hamas since 1987: ~2,000–3,000 deaths caused. ~1,200 from Oct 7, 2023, plus prior attacks.
Israel in Gaza since 1987, focused post-2007: 100,000+ Palestinian deaths.
Economic:
Hamas attacks cost Israel hundreds of billions.
Israeli operations caused trillions in Gaza losses.
Infrastructure:
Hamas has caused limited damage in Israel.
Israel has destroyed 60–92% of Gaza buildings.

2026-03-14 16:54:09 UTC

Just a thought.
As I think about the possibility that Erica Kirk is not what people think, and from a checkered past became an asset for the Intel community who entrapped Charlie Kirk to control him, I'm suddenly wondering if Jared Kushner is a similar sort of asset who weaseled his way in to Ivanka Trump's heart, and is now the key saboteur in the Trump administration.
Honestly just wondering out loud.
https://youtu.be/fKyM7gedKEQ

2026-03-13 19:41:00 UTC

- reply

So I tried an experiment with a Col. Douglas Macgregor video.
I asked for 2 scores. One where ChatGPT assumes he knows things being censored from the rest of us.
The other based only on confirmed evidence.
Assume he knows censored facts: 7.5/10
Using only what is verified: 5/10
Why the gap? His argument is built on a structure where the visible pieces already point in his direction, but the decisive parts still depend on claims we cannot verify.
https://www.youtube.com/live/etrJbt3Eijc?si=Rb8ZY7r_Pdby1YvH

2026-03-13 19:26:48 UTC

- reply

Unless the creator turns off automatic transcription, full transcripts are available on Youtube after you hit "more" on the description.
I'm developing a habit on important videos of copying the transcript into ChatGPT and asking for a score based on truthfulness, accuracy, and alignment with known facts.
It gives me a score out of 10, of which I look for at least 65% to be somewhat reliable.
The score drops with ideology, inference, or conspiracy framing.
It's helpful.

2026-03-11 22:40:20 UTC

- reply

I'm going to reiterate something I've said often, and it could explain everything about this administration we oppose.
The Federal Govt is a massive beast. I refer to it as organized crime.
It's been "crafted" by the growing Deepstate over decades. Every agency leadership infrastructure. Even most of the low-level bureaucrats are Democrat.
They HATE Trump as all the rest out there with TDS.
Can a boss run a company efficiently when being lied to about EVERYTHING?
Can he make good decisions?

2026-03-11 21:45:51 UTC

Let's apply some logic to the War against Iran started by the U.S. and Israel.
Trump called for unconditional surrender 5 days ago.
2 days ago he said the war is complete and he and Netanyahu would end it after a mutual decision.
These are different!
If we believe our Govt and Media, the U.S. has dominated here. So why would Trump surrender his initial demand and settle for a ceasefire?
Why not fight until Iran surrenders unconditionally?
Maybe we're not getting the truth.

2026-03-10 14:24:24 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…a7n2
The only reason we don't see more of this is that very few votes from illegal aliens are actually cast by those illegal aliens, and they would say so in their trials.
So the only ones that get arrested are the ones that admit that they illegally voted themselves.
The rest are just names in voter registration databases that are used to cast illegal mail-in ballots.

2026-03-10 05:10:02 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…h2rj
Those GOP senators are happy the way things are.
They're not interested in the people choosing their leaders.
"Why leave it to chance?"
~thinks every selected politician

2026-03-09 22:36:15 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…ekqd
Honestly, that long-standing determination may have played right into Netanyahu's Greater Israel plan.
@nprofile…7zyd

2026-03-09 21:23:01 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…7zyd
We've been firehosed with reasons for decades to fight wars.
But is that why Netanyahu forced us into this war right now?
WMD in Iraq? No. But our response to 19 Saudi terrorists on 9/11 was war w/ Iraq.
Hillary gave arms to Al-Qaeda to get Gaddafi. He wanted a gold-backed currency
Who remembers why 20 years in Afghanistan happened? We lost
We started the Ukraine War in 2014
Are we now Iranian People First? No
Nukes in Iran? Well, no. But Iran was ready to attack Israel. WAR!

2026-03-09 20:26:17 UTC

- reply

(2016–Present)
In recent years Ritter has become a frequent geopolitical commentator, particularly on Russia-Ukraine and NATO policy. His views often criticize U.S. and NATO strategic decisions and emphasize military analysis of conflicts. Supporters view him as an independent analyst; critics argue his assessments can be sympathetic to Russian perspectives.
5/5

2026-03-09 20:25:42 UTC

- reply

(2004–2015)
Following the Iraq War, Ritter wrote books and appeared in media arguing the invasion had been based on flawed intelligence. His work focused on arms control, intelligence integrity, and U.S. foreign policy decisions. During this period he was often associated with anti-war commentary rather than a formal political party.
4/5

2026-03-09 20:25:20 UTC

- reply

(2000–2003)
After 2000, Scott Ritter became a prominent critic of U.S. claims that Iraq possessed active WMD programs. He argued that inspections in the 1990s had largely dismantled Iraq’s capabilities and warned that intelligence used to justify the 2003 invasion was exaggerated or misrepresented.
3/5

2026-03-09 20:24:56 UTC

- reply

(Pre-2000 Political Leanings)
Before 2000, Ritter was generally viewed as aligned with U.S. national-security and arms-control institutions rather than partisan politics. His outlook emphasized strict enforcement of arms-inspection regimes and military intelligence analysis. He was not publicly identified with a clear left/right political movement during that period.
2/5

2026-03-09 20:23:53 UTC

Scott Ritter (born 1961) is a former U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer who served as a United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991–1998 with the UN Special Commission (UNSCOM). He became widely known for publicly disputing U.S. claims about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction prior to the 2003 Iraq War.
1/5

2026-03-09 20:20:36 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…ekqd @nprofile…h2rj
And Seattle has a statue of Lenin that used to be publicly prominent at University of Washington.
There's quite a leap from reading someone's writings, or even praising them and acting in support of their ideas.
Sometimes it helps avoid mistakes to know how others think.

2026-03-09 18:21:28 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…h2rj
Scott Ritter says their leader we killed has been replaced by someone who is pro nuke, in contrast to the leader that we killed.
Again, have we made things worse?

2026-03-09 17:35:19 UTC

There's some great information about the technology of our interceptors and Iran's non-ballistic missiles explained by Scott Ritter.
https://www.youtube.com/live/ZGazMbUn1-I

2026-03-09 16:39:49 UTC

I guess we never learn, do we?
We just surrendered Afghanistan after nearly 20 years ticking on a guerrilla force, leaving some $85 billion dollars of military equipment and aircraft for the Taliban.
We've even gone so far to pay the Taliban a monthly multi-million dollar grant, for what?
Now we're taking on a country of 93 million, most of whom are furious with the United States for empowering religious fanatics, and they've been planning for this war for decades.
How gullible are we?

2026-03-09 01:07:54 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…h2rj
Germany intentionally collapsed the value of their currency so the reparations, paid in their currency, ended up amounting to very little.

2026-03-08 22:38:31 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…h2rj
I have recognized and said it for quite a long time that there's no shortage of solutions to all of America's problems. There's just this firewall of corruption that stands between reforms and action.
When has an organized crime syndicate ever agreed to align itself with the interests of others.
When your government is made up of the slimiest, most unethical and self-serving scum in your nation, very little gets done for good.

2026-03-08 17:01:50 UTC

- reply

5/5
Term limits for the Supreme Court ~75%
Mandatory Supreme Court ethics rules ~80%
Audit the Federal Reserve ~75%
Congressional oversight of the Federal Reserve ~75%
Prevent Federal Reserve conflicts of interest ~75%
~77% of Americans believe government is run for the benefit of a few powerful interests rather than the public.

2026-03-08 17:01:25 UTC

- reply

4/5
Close offshore tax loopholes ~75%
End special-interest tax loopholes ~75%
Work requirements for welfare recipients ~70%
Stop government benefit fraud ~85%
Provide benefits only to legal residents ~80%
Train welfare recipients for work ~75%
Stop overlapping benefit programs ~75%

2026-03-08 17:00:59 UTC

- reply

3/5
Independent redistricting commissions ~70%
Detailed government spending disclosures ~75%
All laws applying to the public apply equally to Congress ~75%
Sunset clauses for major laws ~75%
Simplify the tax code ~85%
Ban Congress from adopting targeted tax breaks ~85%
Require corporations to pay a minimum tax ~75%

2026-03-08 17:00:33 UTC

- reply

2/5
Term limits for Congress ~80–85%
Ban or severe limits on lobbying ~75–80%
Ban stock trading by Congress ~80–90%
Campaign finance reform ~70–80%
Limits on corporate influence ~70–75%
Election voter ID ~80%
Balanced budget amendment ~70%
Lifetime ban on members of Congress becoming lobbyists ~80%
Full disclosure of campaign donations ~80%

2026-03-08 16:59:57 UTC

Something to think about.
When you remove the nukes lie pushed by Netanyahu for 20 years, and ignore the oil motive I've launched the revolution by the CIA and UK in 1953, rand the Zionist agenda starting to war, and instead focus on efforts to free the Iranian people from a tyrannical religious govt, I'm left wondering how those motives compare to the desires of Americans for changes in our own govt.
If only our govt was as responsive to our overwhelming demands for reform as Iran's.
1/5

2026-03-08 01:39:09 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…0phu @nprofile…rc7y
You mean a Biden lied? Tell me it isn't so.

2026-03-07 23:37:59 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…h2rj
Why should any European country build a Navy, a proficient army, or substantial Air Force when they've got NATO, funded primarily by the United States, and the promise that NATO will protect them?
When Europe abandoned their individual national sovereignties, they abandoned a lot more than individual economic incentives, laws, and regs.
They abandoned their ability to defend themselves. And the UK's Navy is a result of decades of compliance to Brussels, and it's reliance on NATO.

2026-03-07 18:28:23 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…7zyd
Are they? A billion dollars a day.
Regime change is only the excuse for more wars. It always fails and hundreds if thousands die every time.
Ukraine is being wiped out, and we started that regime change in 2014. A million dead?

2026-03-06 20:59:20 UTC

- reply

https://www.youtube.com/live/D7J2YwDNZBg

2026-03-06 20:55:13 UTC

Trump has ejected Tucker Carlson from MAGA. Why? Because he's asked the questions that Christian Zionists embarrassed themselves answering, exposing their Israel First loyalties. Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee among the most influential.
Carlson rejects Zionist collective punishment too. The killing of innocent men, women, and children because of the actions of others.
If this is the line in the sand, Trump just crossed it for me. MTG and Massie attacks had me very close already.
America FIRST!

2026-03-06 20:38:44 UTC

Actually no, across all categories.
These are absolute numbers and not per capita. California's population status as #1 drives up the total numbers in all categories, but per capita, with the exception of tech/venture capital investment where they're #2, their average is about #20 in the rest of those categories.
Gavin Newsom is a liar.

2026-03-06 19:19:32 UTC

I can't fully explain my pessimism, but my life battling the swamp started in the mid '90s. It was no small thing. City, county, state govt, court system up to the state supreme court. Corruption so blatant that I learned the futility of fighting it when the entire system was exposed as corrupt.
Even with FBI behind us, back when they seemed to be interested in fighting corruption, our efforts were thwarted by a US attorney's office.
Since then it all follows the pattern.
Organized crime!

2026-03-06 19:05:32 UTC

I hope I'm wrong. I think Netanyahu has not only handed Democrats the house in November, this may have cripled Trump's support from his base.
Trying to excommunicate Tucker Carlson from MAGA? MTG and Massie?
And what does Tucker do, but like Candice Owens, he raises questions, and challenges bullsh""t answers.
Exposed Ted Cruz, and then he allowed Mike Huckabee to destroy himself.
Trump has changed. Somehow he's been compromised. I wish it wasn't true, but too many broken big promises.

2026-03-06 06:35:36 UTC

Now Netanyahu has the U.S. killing children?

2026-03-05 21:33:14 UTC

My wife has a friend whose son was deployed to the Middle East before this war started. Her friend told her that in the last call with her son a few days ago, he said he didn't expect a survive this war.

2026-03-05 21:26:49 UTC

I do have to say, that Trump attacking Tucker Carlson, personally, is very reminiscent of his 2016 GOP primary days, and the way he's going after MTG and Thomas Massie continues to show a side of him that is unworthy of a president.
It may appeal to much of his base, make him seem like a regular guy next door, but if you listen to Tucker, or MTG, or Massie, it's very concerning that he targets the most independent of conservatives, and leaves the RINOs alone.

2026-03-05 20:06:21 UTC

When Trump didn't end the Ukraine War, and instead continued to support Ukraine with arms and funding to NATO, I wondered what he knew that we didn't.
We need dismissed the Epstein files, and suggested we should just move on, I wondered what does he know that we don't.
Now that he's backed Netanyahu's war against Iran, again I'm left wondering what does he know, or afraid of that can be worse than losing a war with Iran?
We don't know what we don't know.

2026-03-05 18:40:54 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…7zyd
Unless they're running things

2026-03-05 17:05:52 UTC

Jeffrey Sachs is a U.S. economist who advised economic reforms in the late Cold War and post-Soviet period. His work intersected with the administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, and later with global development initiatives supported during the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
https://youtu.be/AZ9_G920jL0

2026-03-05 16:41:43 UTC

Just saw a clip of CNN on the air stating that they are withholding certain information that they've obtained because the "Israeli government" asked them to.
Does the Israeli government have a direct pipeline to our legacy media? Wouldn't it be appropriate for them to communicate through our government if it's in our national interest?
Is CNN an international news Corp now answering to the Mossad, as well as CIA and MI6?

2026-03-05 16:40:58 UTC

- reply

After 1948 Zionism shifted from creating a state to sustaining and defending it. Israel absorbed large waves of Jewish immigrants from Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. The conflict with Palestinians and surrounding Arab states became the central geopolitical issue shaping debates about Zionism today.
6/6

2026-03-05 16:40:26 UTC

- reply

Partition & Statehood (1947–1948)
The United Nations proposed partitioning Palestine into Jewish and Arab states in 1947. Jewish leadership accepted the plan; Arab leaders rejected it. In 1948, Jewish leaders declared the state of Israel, leading to the first Arab-Israeli war.
5/6

2026-03-05 16:39:58 UTC

- reply

British Mandate Period (1920–1947)
Jewish immigration increased, especially as persecution rose in Europe. Tensions grew between Jewish and Arab communities over land, political control, and immigration levels. Britain attempted several partition and restriction plans but struggled to manage escalating violence and competing national claims.
4/6

2026-03-05 16:39:31 UTC

- reply

World War I & International Support
During World War I, Britain issued the Balfour Declaration (1917), supporting a Jewish national home in Palestine. After the war, the League of Nations gave Britain the Mandate for Palestine, incorporating that commitment while also promising protections for existing non-Jewish communities.
3/6

2026-03-05 16:39:05 UTC

- reply

Political Zionism (1890s–1917)
Journalist Theodor Herzl organized the political movement. The First Zionist Congress in 1897 called for establishing a Jewish national home in Palestine. Early Jewish immigrants began purchasing land and forming agricultural settlements.
2/6

2026-03-05 16:38:36 UTC

After a 4,000-year-old promise...
Modern Zionism emerged in late-19th-century Europe amid rising antisemitism and nationalism. Jewish thinkers argued that Jews, like other nations, needed a homeland for security and self-determination. The idea focused on historic Jewish ties to the land of Israel, then part of the Ottoman Empire.
1/6

2026-03-05 16:35:08 UTC

Just saw a clip of CNN on the air stating that they are withholding certain information that they've obtained because the "Israeli government" asked them to.

2026-03-05 16:24:52 UTC

What if...
What if last Saturday was chosen for war because Netanyahu feared his involvement in the murder of Charlie Kirk might be exposed, and he knew such revelations would turn America against his expansionist efforts in the Middle East?
Would have forced Zionists to go to war by themselves. A war they could not win without the resources provided by the American taxpayer.
So far, the excuses given by our government for initiation of war last Saturday is not backed up by any facts.

2026-03-05 04:18:18 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…vxmq
I don't think Bondi did this. This was too big not to have come from Trump.
Just one more question that will likely not be answered.

2026-03-04 21:57:44 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…s7tv
I think revenue attracts everyone in alt media. Perhaps not at first, but as their channels grow they see the opportunity to monetize. And once they monetize, followers / subscribers need to grow to increase revenue, so material is needed to keep people interested.
And that's where I think a lot of it goes wrong, because in the desperation to get content, many resort to bad sources, or debating the lies that were told from legacy media and the govt.
And that's worthless.

2026-03-04 21:55:09 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…s7tv
I think maybe the irrelevant question would be, with the facts why doesn't legacy media report anything?
I can't remember who said it recently, but it's one of my favorite media phrases now. "The news media doesn't exist to report the news; it exists to cover it up".

2026-03-04 21:09:01 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…3u6l
Actually, when Tucker Carlson pressed Mike Huckabee on the question, his response was "fine" to the suggestion that the promise could be interpreted to apply to most of the Middle East, from the Euphrates to the Nile.
Interpretations and translations appear to be pretty dangerous excuses to support expanding wars that look like they could spread across most of the Middle East.
And if Netanyahu did force Trump to engage or deal with the retaliation from Iran, how far will this go?

2026-03-04 21:02:58 UTC

- reply

Finally, as to MAGA.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
That was a pretty tall order and encompassed nearly a total reversal of the direction the uniparty was taking us.
But when did unlimited support for Israel's agenda become the litmus test to be MAGA?
The ones behind it are Christian Zionists who seem to have infiltrated alt media everywhere.
But why not? We give billions of dollars to Israel to finance their buying of our Congress, our presidents, our legacy media, and now alt media.

2026-03-04 20:55:15 UTC

- reply

Clearly in my mind, liberalism is a cult. One that has been fostered by a legacy media that lies about everything, and a Democrat Party that builds upon those lies. A cult that tens of millions of Americans are trapped in, hopelessly firewalled from deprogramming while they're in the cult.
But now, and this is my opinion, millions on the right are in a cult too. One where they embrace the Messiah, but focus first on a people that reject Christ as the Messiah.
It's illogical brainwashing.

2026-03-04 20:50:58 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…3u6l
I'd never had a serious opinion about Israel before. I accepted the Holocaust, the persecution of Jews throughout history. But I'll admit I never understood the basis for the country given to them in 1948.
Then to watch people l've so respected once upon a time, try to convince me that it was an Old Testament promise, in writings by Jews, that is only valid to Zionists, who reject Jesus Christ as the Messiah. A coming that led to the New Testament as the revised chapter of salvation.

2026-03-04 20:45:21 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…3u6l
I don't know it. But I do know that if I'm lied to by a source that I'm not going to listen to what they tell me.
And when my instinct, 50 years in the making, sees patterns that explain history in my lifetime that media and experts fail to do, I rely on that instinct.
It's proven to be pretty accurate, as the instincts that I have operated under early on, tend to eventually be realized when the false narratives collapse.
I may live in a cult of lies, but I don't have to play along.

2026-03-04 20:01:02 UTC

- reply

It's not easy to push back against the propaganda. We've been inundated with lies and psyops these last few decades that have scrambled all of our brains.
But as the conspiracy theories become conspiracy fact one of the time, it would be prudent for people to question what we're told, regardless of how often we're told it, and by whom.
We used to think Mike Pompeo, Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee, and others had our interests first.
They don't. Everything they've ever said now is untrustworthy.

2026-03-04 19:55:56 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…7zyd
I'm simply more focused on the truth and not blindly accepting what we're told these days.
When you look at the history of Iran and how we screwed them over starting in 1953 with another CIA involved coup d'etat over oil, the context of current events makes more sense.
And while many Iranians may embrace our help in overthrowing their regime, that does not ensure that they love America, as they likely know their history a lot better than we know their history.

2026-03-04 19:13:35 UTC

- reply

What is the truth? Who is the villain in this war?
Curious and courageous people dare to know the answers.
Here's some free speech in action.
https://youtu.be/OYQeXFim9oU

2026-03-04 18:02:10 UTC

- reply

Trump's current chief of staff, Susie Wiles, actually worked for Netanyahu in the past.
Who made that decision to put her that close to Trump?
It goes to who really decides on Trump appointees, of which about half of them turn out to be disasters for America First?
Nothing was learned by Trump in the first term, or if it was, he was powerless to put America First people a top his agencies.

2026-03-04 18:00:22 UTC

- reply

If the US knew that Netanyahu was going to attack Iran, forcing United States to engage or get pounded, if Trump really had any interest in preventing war, he would have told Netanyahu that if he did it, they'd be absolutely cut off forever.
In their own!
How would of that of been accepted by a govt full of Christian Zionists and Israel First loyalists?
In a recent statement Trump even admited that this war is not just about making America safe but other countries safe.
That is Israel.

2026-03-04 17:53:44 UTC

- reply

Netanyahu called Trump's bluff.
By attacking Iran, the Zionists forced Trump to make a decision. Does America let Iran decimate Israel, or does America expend our resources and blood to defend the aggressor?
Given that our government is riddled with Christian Zionists loyal to Israel First, Trump had an impossible decision.
And now not only is Israel at risk of self-destruction, but pushing America to its limits as well.
Bibi's 40-year dream of war with Iran has lit the world on fire.

2026-03-04 17:49:17 UTC

If you heard Marco Rubio talking to the press yesterday about the justification for US/Israel preemptive strike against Iran, then you know we're at war with Iran because of Israel.
Rubio made it clear that the concern was that when Israel launched against Iran, and it was determined they were about to, that if the U.S. did not attack too, Iran would have done great damage to our Gulf bases.
Per Rubio, anyone who claims that we're not at war because of Israel, is either lying or ignorant.

2026-03-04 05:01:43 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…h2rj
In 1953, the CIA and the UK overthrew the Iranian government fearing they were losing control of the oil in Iran after it was nationalized. The CIA then installed the Shah whose U.S. backed secret police used oppression of opposition, that along with the Shah's Western modernization, turned the other political factions against the CIA's puppet government.
In 1979 after the smoke cleared, the Islamists had taken control of the country, and the rest is history.
Another CIA failure!

2026-03-04 03:00:08 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…dxc8
Oh, so this time it was true?
20 years we listened to lies, but this time, I trust him. Don't you?
Wow, world survived by 3 weeks. Awesome!

2026-03-03 21:18:39 UTC

One diplomats view of American foreign policy in the Middle East.
https://www.youtube.com/live/Uyes2e_7Aa8

2026-03-03 21:04:34 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…s7tv
I agree completely. I'm not untried before.
But 3 million Epstein Files might expose a lot of terrorist funders.
Some serious action in America might make a dent in the tens of thousands of terrorists the Biden regime let in.
Consider what US action in this war will do to empower all of our enemies in the Gulf States? Not the governments that we prop up, but the people we ignore who'll hate us more.
Our history in suppressing terrorists is very bad.

2026-03-03 19:19:58 UTC

The U.S. military used Anthropic’s Claude AI during recent strikes on Iran and continues to rely on it, even as federal agencies have been ordered to phase out the technology following a dispute over usage limits.
Source: CBS News

2026-03-03 18:48:05 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…s7tv
Only 91,999,800 to go.

2026-03-03 17:23:37 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…7zyd
An open mind is all that is necessary. A suspicion. A curiosity. Simply not gobbling what the same sources who've lied to us our entire lives are telling us.
If Catherine Austin Fitts is right in one possibility, and she's pretty clever, then all of this is about implementing a global digital control grid.
And Iran is a large powerful nation that opposes it.
Do I believe it? I don't believe anything outright, and that's what sets people like me apart.
I'm narrative immune.

2026-03-03 16:34:59 UTC

I'm going to give a piece of unsolicited advice.
It's been my experience involved in, and following politics, that the initial information provided on any large controversial event is designed to build a narrative.
That narrative will be accepted by the vast majority of people, and as the truth leaks out over time, it can take forever for that majority to accept that the initial narratives were false.
Finding an event of significance where the truth leads rarely happens.

2026-03-03 16:30:15 UTC

What are the chances that it's actually Israel bombing oil resources in the Gulf as false flags to implicate Iran?
After all, the threat or possibility by Iran to do it is neutralized if it's done?
What are the chances that Mike Huckabee's revelation that it would be "fine" for Israel to to fulfill Old Testament prophecy and take ownership of most of the Middle East is part of Bibi's motivation here?
In a world where everything is a lie, can we really dismiss anything?

2026-03-03 16:16:42 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…eqfl
And this is, again, projection.
Democrats exist to accuse their opponents of what Democrats are guilty of.

2026-03-03 16:15:54 UTC

Consider. If the designated survivor scenario ever played out in the United States, how many minutes would it take for our entire Congress to be replaced with equally corrupt politicians?
Corrupt regimes don't suddenly become less corrupt when the head is removed. It simply grows a new head.

2026-03-03 16:14:02 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…3u6l @nprofile…h2rj
Remember, most gold and silver is paper only. And futures prices as well. For every ounce of gold or silver there are literally hundreds of paper contracts that are traded.
The price of both is driven by the trading of those paper contracts and not the actual physical stuff, hence the premium that's attached when you buy or sell physical gold or silver.

2026-03-03 04:23:55 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…pywr
History seems to prove that patience does little more than reveal what we were lied about.
And we are, and have been lied to about nearly everything of importance for our lifetimes.
People in cults stay because they believe, without reservation, what their leaders say.
I used to be one of those people. But apparently, everyone has different points where they finally awaken that it's all lies.

2026-03-03 04:03:17 UTC

We've barely moved beyond years of lies from our government, from state governments, from the media about COVID, the vaccines, masks, social distancing, lockdowns, Remdesuvir, and tens of millions of people worldwide have paid the price with their lives, and 100 million injured.
When are people going to stop believing what these people tell us?

2026-03-03 00:45:43 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…a7n2
Why might Slick Willy kiss up to Trump?
This is all a dog and pony show.

2026-03-02 03:38:35 UTC

The only chance we have to survive what "they" have planned for us, is first, disregard what "they" tell us.
They've lied to us our entire lives, and the lies are more outrageous than ever. We can't believe them!
If you don't see it with your own eyes, or hear it in person with your own ears, it's more than likely to be part of a psyop.
Instead, work to find explanations that align with organized criminal enterprises at a global scale.
We are nothing but sheep in their pens otherwise.

2026-03-01 04:23:03 UTC

Charlie Kirk certainly didn't trust the "experts" who keep getting us into wars.
https://youtu.be/jmrtQyarFXw

2026-03-01 01:32:03 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…zjjq
Wouldn't it be great if we could go after the 18,000 known terrorists inside America and not have the Democrats and their judges and cultists fighting us at every turn?
I'm tired of us fighting other wars overseas while our real enemies work 24/7 to cover up there atrocities, while destroying our country from inside.

2026-02-28 23:55:05 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…ekqd
I can't find anything to complain about, but I'm old enough to know that they've always got great reasons to go to war.
I think anybody that continues to trust what our media and government tells us, are setting themsekved up for disappointment in the long run.
I'm waiting for a war where that's not the case.
Given the ongoing cover-ups and insanity from people appointed that we thought we could trust, I'm just saying.

2026-02-28 19:38:52 UTC

It'll be interesting listening to Trump attempt to dismiss the fact today that he started a war.

2026-02-28 16:43:41 UTC

Interesting. I'm watching a Jimmy Dore Show and he's talking about I rather large discrepancy found related to the Jeffrey Epstein death.
In the Epstein files are two files that state that Epstein had his prostate removed, with one from him confirming it, and another email describing the radical prostatectomy where it was removed.
How inept were the file censors?
In the files is also the autopsy of "Epstein" after the alleged suicide describing the health of his existing prostate.

2026-02-28 16:33:27 UTC

Did you watch Catherine Austin Fitts interview with Tucker Carlson yesterday?
I posted how she said talked about a motive for Trump to surrender our forces to Netanyahu to fight a war that Zionists want. It may be more than just that.
Fitts spoke about the digital control grid. The ending of cash an implementation of digital currencies, such as CBDCs that are programmable allowing the elite to control us.
Iran is a smaller player than China and Russia, but it is a barrier to that control.

2026-02-27 22:09:41 UTC

- reply

Something is just struck me thinking about what Catherine Fitts said about nuging after Tucker Carlson talked about how it took him two weeks to get cash to give his staff bonuses.
Thinking back to when the bank reserve requirements were set to zero. That no doubt resulted in a significant crunch on cash held by banks, as they would lend out every penny deposited chasing their greed.
Was that part of the strategy to nudge people away from cash to digital payments?

2026-02-27 22:05:32 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…eqfl
DOJ has no problem arresting stupid leftist with no money and no influence.
If only they applied the same standard to rich satanic pedophiles working to kill most of us with killer vaccines, poisonous food, and destroying our young adults in wars.

2026-02-27 21:27:03 UTC

- reply

After talking about the benefits of dual citizenship with Israel, and hiding money in foreign accounts, Tucker asks her about the network.
She says she calls it the Epstein Network, but it's really the Rothschilds Network.

2026-02-27 21:22:41 UTC

- reply

She's asked about Thomas Massie. Says he's a rule of law guy, and the battle he's fighting, even against Trump, is whether the rule of law will run America, or a cabal of ultra-rich that will be above the law.
I think we're seeing clearly which side of that equation Trump is on, and it's very disappointing to me.
The FBI and DOJ protecting the ultra-rich pedophiles, is just one example. But she's also talked about unconstitutional acts that Congress and admins have done for the rich.

2026-02-27 20:57:34 UTC

- reply

If you want to read her unpublished book she speaks of. The one where life was threatened so she didn't publish it. I believe this is the book.
https://dillonreadandco.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/AustinFitts_DillonRead.pdf