J.K. Rowling

Author, founder of Lumos and Beira's Place, surname rhymes with bowling, not growling.
This account is a replica from Twitter. Its author can't see your replies. If you find this service useful, please consider supporting us via our Patreon.

Location: Scotland
Official: https://twitter.com/jk_rowling
Support this service: https://www.patreon.com/birddotmakeup

Public Key

npub10cdj7m4scndpdzc5sd5drqv2vkk90pa44qyynscf8swx6jgdlvjs8akgg5

NIP-05 Address

jk_rowling_at_bird.makeup@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8uxe0d6cvfksk3v2gx6x3sx9xttzhs766szzfcvync8rdfyxlkfgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds32ye8k

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub10cdj7m4scndpdzc5sd5drqv2vkk90pa44qyynscf8swx6jgdlvjs8akgg5

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-05-27 11:32:42 UTC

Being biologically female means having a body that is observably organised to produce large gametes (eggs), as opposed to a body organised to produce small gametes (sperm). A woman is female whether her eggs have been fertilised or not. A man can never be female.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJUoA9NW4AQY3aM.jpg

2026-02-13 12:49:58 UTC

Strike fans public service announcement: having just met @npub1pwl…n9gc and friends in person at last and told them the title of Strike #9, it seems right to tell you too…
Sleep Tight, Evangeline

2026-01-11 03:17:01 UTC

If you claim to support human rights yet can’t bring yourself to show solidarity with those fighting for their liberty in Iran, you’ve revealed yourself. You don’t give a damn about people being oppressed and brutalised so long as it’s being done by the enemies of your enemies.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G-WgZVlbgAAkhxC.jpg

2026-01-10 17:52:51 UTC

Fabulous! I've been trying to get arrested for knowing what a woman is for a couple of years now and no luck at all, yet they persecute and harass working class women who need to crowdfund for their defence. I've been discriminated against far too long. Fingers crossed for 2026!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G-Udy-OasAACLv-.jpg

2026-01-08 01:51:38 UTC

The bravery of these people is astounding. They're light in what lately has felt like a very dark world.
https://bird.makeup/users/gghamari/statuses/2008845650637844959
#note1ecr…5nvv

2025-12-25 21:14:15 UTC

🎄⭐️ Merry Christmas one and all ⭐️🎄

2025-12-23 16:55:58 UTC

🎄My new heading is an early Christmas present to Strike fans. (The clues are in the charms, there's no new bracelet in #9!)🎄

2025-12-20 09:40:35 UTC

- reply

No, they’re me emoticons. I’m working, surrounded by all the people I love best and looking forward to a holiday.
If they’d been Strike #9 emoticons they’d have been 🦋💍⚰️

2025-12-18 21:58:04 UTC

And yet here I am, having the time of my life. ✍️❤️‍🔥🌴
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G8e6mpKWEAAWN2Z.jpg

2025-12-12 19:49:35 UTC

Please explain what differentiates a trans woman from 'a man in a dress and make up', because I've been playing close attention to trans activists for a decade now and the most common explanation I've been given is 'he says he's a woman, so play along or you're evil.'
Runner up explanations:
A man is a trans woman if he's put in a lot of effort into looking like a woman. However, a man who's made no such effort is just as valid a trans woman as one who does. Trans women with beards and penises are completely valid.
The existence of men and women with differences of sexual development ('intersex' people) prove that a completely different group of people who don't have such disorders are trans if they say they are.
The true mark of who's a man or a woman isn't biological sex, but the untestable gender identity that resides in all human beings, whether or not they believe in it. At the same time, trans people must be given easy, automatic access to cross-sex hormones and surgeries so they can alter themselves to more closely resemble the opposite biological sex.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G7_j4q7XcAMCMnG.jpg

2025-12-11 18:56:59 UTC

Judge Sandy Kemp and the Judicial Office need to explain exactly how this bogus quote made its way into the ruling. Misrepresentations of the Forstater ruling are commonplace in the trans activist community, but for this to turn up in an actual court ruling is truly shocking.
https://bird.makeup/users/mforstater/statuses/1998680325052850388
#note1xyx…6lny

2025-12-10 09:12:06 UTC

Are you even human if you don't have a good deep sniff of a Sharpie before writing with it.

2025-12-07 09:31:49 UTC

Man assumes his fellow men won’t take ‘no’ for an answer, will break the law, will transgress women’s boundaries unless physical force is used against them, and wants to make it clear that he’s entirely on the men’s side.
https://bird.makeup/users/johnmcdonnellmp/statuses/1997406371550306523
#note1gfr…64dc

2025-12-05 17:58:06 UTC

Bless these girls for their courage and shame on every cowardly adult and every faux feminist who told them they should give up their own rights to pander to boys' feelings.
https://bird.makeup/users/brandikruse/statuses/1996420147385659570
#note10nv…z6xz

2025-12-03 22:01:39 UTC

Answer: it helps girls. It tells girls they have the right to things of their own. It tells girls they have the right to say 'no'. It reminds girls that the desires of boys do not supersede their feelings, their rights, their discomfort or their safety.
https://bird.makeup/users/nyaravt/statuses/1995896867264077926
#note14et…7267

2025-10-30 10:50:31 UTC

I grew up in an era when mainstream women’s magazines told girls they needed to be thinner and prettier.
Now mainstream women’s magazines tell girls that men are better women than they are.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G4gMI6GW0AANxBK.jpg

2025-10-27 01:56:55 UTC

It is not ‘hate’ to speak the truth.
It is not ‘hate’ to defend the rights of women and girls.
It is not ‘hate’ to be deeply worried about an unevidenced medical experiment on minors.
Rationality goes out of the window when you pretend men can be women.
https://bird.makeup/users/bgatesisapyscho/statuses/1978450747688645079
#note1vmu…88ch

2025-10-08 12:47:16 UTC

- reply

De Beauvoir, as you’d know if you’d actually read her, was noting that to be accorded the status of a ‘real’ woman in a male dominated society, girls are pressured to adopt and display behaviours that might feel inauthentic and restrictive. You, meanwhile, are siding with women’s oppressors in stating a woman is anyone who performs an often pornified male idea of what a woman should look or behave like. It is not only highly regressive to decree that femininity is the true measure of femaleness, it is precisely what de Beauvoir was arguing against.

2025-10-08 11:42:50 UTC

A woman is someone who doesn't need to put in any work to become a woman, because she's already a woman.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G2vEhIvWkAA1rSu.jpg

2025-10-08 10:14:57 UTC

- reply

I don’t like the colour, I wanted Barbie pink, so I’m entitled to leave you out of pocket. Some might call this petty and vengeful, but if it’s good enough for the Scottish government, it’s good enough for me.

2025-10-08 10:01:11 UTC

SNP ministers have failed to pay their £250k bill, six months after the Supreme Court ruling. The rumour is that they’re trying to stop ⁦@ForWomenScot⁩ taking further action against the government, but that plan has a rather large flaw. Me. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15171219/SNP-ministers-fail-pay-250k-bill-six-months-Supreme-Court-ruling.html

2025-10-05 13:21:18 UTC

"Pro-Palestinian demonstrators couldn’t give it a rest – not even for 24 hours. They were chanting all the old slogans and ducking all the hard questions. ‘Globalise the intifada,’ they cried – does that mean killing Jews in Manchester?" ✍️@NickCohen4
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-wont-the-left-call-out-anti-semitism-for-what-it-is/

2025-10-01 21:31:14 UTC

I am if you're the alternative.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G2NH_j0WcAAI54j.jpg

2025-09-29 14:48:19 UTC

- reply

She could have contacted me privately any time to say her views had changed, if they have. I'd have been entirely supportive. What she's chosen to do instead is yet another bit of public brand repositioning, without talking to me, but using me for her purpose. It's getting old.

2025-09-29 09:54:39 UTC

I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.
I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.
Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.
However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.
When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.
The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.
Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison?
I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.
The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest.
Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.
https://bird.makeup/users/sexmattersorg/statuses/1972569118454034858
#note18fr…h5zg

2025-09-28 17:26:40 UTC

- reply

Oh, please. If you thought I wanted you dead you wouldn’t be round here every half an hour, trying to cadge a fiver and eyeing up my dining room chairs.

2025-09-28 17:22:43 UTC

‘That bitch’ definitely doesn’t want you dead. She does think you could use some mental health support, though.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G18zCE7X0AAiKlh.jpg

2025-09-27 22:26:36 UTC

- reply

And some rapists make the effort to perform femininity.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G14u5hoW0AAXXPi.jpg

2025-09-27 21:43:04 UTC

At last, @npub1r9d…555l, you can clear this up for me! What is the difference between 'an actual trans woman' and a sexual predator who says he's a woman? How can we tell? What are the hallmarks of the 'actual' trans woman?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G14kacwXQAApMd5.jpg

2025-09-26 10:27:43 UTC

- reply

The trans umbrella stretches over a wide array of people who have virtually nothing in common with each other, eg, trauma-experienced and often same-sex attracted teenagers who believe transition is the route to happiness and are undergoing irreversible surgeries and drug treatments (extremely vulnerable) and adult straight men with a cross-dressing fetish who retain their genitalia and are demanding access to all women’s protected spaces (not remotely vulnerable, but thoroughly pandered to, at the expense of women and girls.)

2025-09-26 10:02:45 UTC

I'm already missing [@intel_lady](https://bird.makeup/users/intel_lady )'s Angela Rayner,
but I'm here for ALL the spoofs🤣
https://bird.makeup/users/intel_lady/statuses/1971310795335340484
#note1ryv…d8z9

2025-09-26 09:45:05 UTC

- reply

Trans people already have all the rights everyone else in society has, but some (not all) trans people demand that women give up rights: the right to single-sex spaces, to fair sport and to freedom of speech. No marginalised group has ever demanded that rights be stripped from other protected group, and no other supposedly marginalised group has ever been indulged by politicians, police and elite institutions to the extent the trans lobby has.

2025-09-26 06:52:01 UTC

Every word.
https://bird.makeup/users/salltweets/statuses/1971434156908564909
#note1w0h…x4k7

2025-09-25 12:36:03 UTC

A little reminder for anyone who may be regretting their very public sprint to the front of the mob and is now trying to discreetly shove their pitchfork out of sight.
https://bird.makeup/users/jk_rowling/statuses/1918747065460420745
#note1hqp…djd7

2025-09-24 20:02:18 UTC

I don't find the contents of this article by @npub17kr…pllz surprising, but it's probably significant that ten years ago I'd have found them both sinister and shocking.
https://bird.makeup/users/thecriticmag/statuses/1970729917429228000
#note122r…0kl7

2025-09-24 08:17:21 UTC

Never in my lifetime have so many people tried to signal their intellectual and moral superiority by playing stupid.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1mP2ZMXYAAGvHT.jpg

2025-09-23 07:55:25 UTC

I wonder what it is about a movement campaigning to allow men into protected spaces for women and girls that might attract sexual predators. A mystery for the ages.
https://bird.makeup/users/reduxxmag/statuses/1970201243223048321
#note1yk5…c89k

2025-09-22 18:34:13 UTC

- reply

This is a very old straw man argument. It is precisely because men and women are biologically different, and because women have been historically oppressed due to that biological difference, that feminism was necessary.

2025-09-22 17:19:22 UTC

Feminism fought for women's sex-based rights.
Pretending males can also be female erases sex-based rights.
Calling women and girls 'transphobic' for wanting sex-based rights is misogyny.
#LibDemMisogyny
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1d3d4pWoAAVlOx.jpg

2025-09-17 09:31:18 UTC

Words are not violence. When you pretend that views that oppose your own are violence, you are justifying the use of actual violence towards the speaker.
Gender ideology’s reliance on tropes and slogans like ‘words are violence’, its constant rationalisation and justification of using force against opponents and its preference for enforcing compliance through fear rather than permitting debate, are straight out of fascism’s playbook.
‘The function of propaganda is . . . not to weigh and ponder the rights of different people, but exclusively to emphasize the one right which it has set out to argue for. Its task is not to make an objective study of the truth, in so far as it favors the enemy, and then set it before the masses with academic fairness; its task is to serve our own right, always and unflinchingly.’
The words are Hitler’s, but I must have seen trans activists say the same thing, barely rephrased, a thousand times. Your movement seeks to remove rights from others. It is anti-truth and critical thinking, pro-violence, pro-dehumanisation of those who disagree with you, and you are so lacking in self-awareness you cannot see that you are precisely what you pretend to hate.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1CdpH9XcAAt7oc.jpg

2025-09-11 22:20:36 UTC

- reply

You're an empathetic human being who doesn't need to agree with everything another living, breathing human being believed to feel a profound loss when his life is ripped from him by an act of violence.

2025-09-11 21:46:07 UTC

If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.
If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.
If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.
If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.

2025-09-11 09:04:39 UTC

An elected representative of your own party, @npub137z…74nf, was advised by police not to attend Labour conference because of the physical risk to her from trans activists. You did nothing. You showed her no support, You criticised her for stating biological facts.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G0jeAPZXoAAoQlO.jpg

2025-09-10 00:17:34 UTC

Having been informed by multiple men with anime furry avatars that my career is over I'm at a loss to understand how this could have happened.
https://bird.makeup/users/witchymcwitch/statuses/1965535420403642676
#note1py3…042v

2025-09-08 11:18:54 UTC

- reply

Him 👇
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G0Uf9muXMAAh3DZ.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G0Uf9m0W0AAfifa.jpg

2025-09-08 11:09:44 UTC

🙄 Thomas, nobody’s silencing you or interfering in your life. You’re free to deny that an apparently vulnerable youth hanging out with a convicted child sex offender raises red flags and I’m free to say that shouting ‘homophobia’ in such cases enables and emboldens predators.

2025-09-07 12:03:02 UTC

If I saw a young neurodiverse girl in ‘a relationship’ with an adult, heterosexual man, I’d have serious concerns. It is not ‘deeply homophobic’ to be concerned about a vulnerable young male, it’s pro-safeguarding, and I don’t personally know a single gay man who’d disagree.
https://bird.makeup/users/thomaswillett9/statuses/1964641598668730654
#note1yep…m4fv

2025-09-05 11:27:57 UTC

Gladwell’s career wouldn’t have been destroyed if he’d spoken out against the glaring unfairness, not to mention dangers, of allowing men to compete in women’s sport. He’d have faced loss of approval from the cultural elite and received activist blowback, and even that wouldn’t have come with the tsunami of death and rape threats women face when they speak.
Non-famous people, mostly women, girls and gay people, have genuinely had their careers and indeed lives destroyed for saying what Gladwell was too pusillanimous to say, and Gladwell didn’t lift a finger in their defence. Like many well-known liberals, he was happy to watch members of the great unwashed bullied, traduced and defamed, fine with the erosion of freedom of speech, comfortable with young women being robbed of sporting honours and facing serious injury, because he valued his own standing and security more highly than acting on the feeble promptings of his conscience.
A rash of condescending men will swarm my mentions when I post this to tell me I should be pleased about Gladwell’s cautious backtracking. No. He hasn’t changed. He’s merely sensed a shift in what it’s acceptable to say and feels safe to align himself with the new consensus, excuses for his previous behaviour to the fore. He isn’t an ally, he’s a weathervane.
Changing sides years late, and only after you’ve realised the non-elite opposition is winning, isn’t a mark of integrity but of arse-covering. Those whose overriding focus is remaining in good odour with the in crowd can never be trusted. Gender identity ideology has been the modern arts world’s McCarthyism, and all Gladwell’s done is reveal himself as a man who’d have named names, but felt a bit uncomfortable about it afterwards.
https://bird.makeup/users/douglaskmurray/statuses/1963766618531496274
#note18tv…ds24

2025-09-03 17:58:53 UTC

The UK: where a comedy writer is met with armed police because he tweeted that if a man refuses to leave a woman-only space he should get kicked in the balls, and elected politician @npub1jg4…h9lv is free to publicly tell a woman to shut the fuck up with a picture of a gun.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gz8K6CRWUAAjFgb.jpg

2025-09-03 09:07:07 UTC

- reply

I know you’re still bitter you weren’t cast as Robin in the TV show, but your unofficial audio ‘reading’ is now in the hands of my legal team. Strike is not non-binary, he does not have a secret yen for a charity worker called Daty Louise and I am not the murderer.

2025-09-02 17:26:47 UTC

Today I found out that audio pre-orders for #TheHallmarkedMan have been the highest in Hachette’s history. Thank you, Strike and Robin fans ❤️ 😭

2025-09-02 11:56:32 UTC

What the fuck has the UK become? This is totalitarianism. Utterly deplorable.
https://bird.makeup/users/speechunion/statuses/1962823252465565803
#note1gze…fyr9

2025-09-01 10:27:21 UTC

As another man who once worked with me declares himself saddened by my beliefs on gender and sex, I thought it might be useful to compile a list for handy reference. Which of the following do you imagine makes actors and directors who aren’t involved with the HBO reboot of Harry Potter so miserable?
Is it my belief that women and girls should have their own public changing rooms and bathrooms?
That women should retain female-only rape crisis centres?
That men don’t belong in women’s sport?
That female prisoners shouldn’t be incarcerated with violent men and male sex offenders?
That women should remain a protected class in law, because they have sex-specific needs and issues?
That language should reflect reality rather than ideological jargon, especially in a medical context?
That women shouldn’t be harassed, persecuted or fired for refusing to pretend humans can change sex?
That women should not be threatened with violence and rape when they assert their rights?
That freedom of speech and belief are essential to a pluralistic democratic society?
That troubled minors, especially those who are gay, autistic and trauma-experienced, should be given mental health support instead of irreversible surgeries and drug treatments on non-existent evidence of benefit?
That gay people shouldn’t be pressured to include the opposite sex in their dating pools, nor should they be smeared as ‘genital fetishists’ when they don’t?
That cross-dressing heterosexual male fetishists aren’t actually oppressed, but having the time of their lives piggybacking off gender identity ideology?
That said ideology, and the privileged, blinkered fools pushing it because they suffer zero consequences themselves, have done more damage to the political left’s credibility than Trump and Farage could have achieved in a century?
Let me have your thoughts.

2025-08-29 14:06:02 UTC

I’ll never understand why a movement intent on removing protected spaces for women and children attracts so many men who appear to wish or enact harm on women and children.
https://bird.makeup/users/twisterfilm/statuses/1961371425643642993
#note1354…3qt4

2025-08-22 13:12:00 UTC

People have written tweets, worn T-shirts and carried placards not only calling me a transphobe, but calling for my death. A horror novel gleefully celebrated my imagined death. I neither sued any of these individuals, nor did I whine about any of them while doing book promotion.
https://bird.makeup/users/thomaswillett9/statuses/1958851061122302022
#note18d4…n0z3

2025-08-22 11:21:23 UTC

I see Nicola Sturgeon is once again complaining that I posted a picture of myself wearing a T-shirt with her name on it and the legend 'Destroyer of Women's Rights.' Apparently this didn't 'elevate the debate.'
Is there a clinical term for an individual who has extreme thinness of skin when it comes to their own perceived hurts, coupled with a rhino-hide when it comes to the fear and suffering of others?
I'm thinking in particular of the two women Isla Bryson raped, who had to watch their First Minister squirm and smirk on TV as she tried to avoid admitting he was a man; of the five survivors of male violence who were ready to give evidence to Sturgeon's committee on gender self-ID, but were told to put their concerns in writing while seventeen trans-identified people appeared in person; of the mother of a young girl with a learning disability who campaigned against self-ID because she wanted her daughter to be guaranteed same sex intimate care, should she need it (the mother was presumably one of those female opponents Sturgeon calls 'shrill' and 'hysterical' in her memoir); of the ten-year-old girl sexually assaulted in a public bathroom by a 6'5" paedophile who served his jail sentence in a women's prison because he called himself 'Katie'; of Sandie Peggie, forced to discuss her own menstrual history in public to justify not wanting to undress in view of a 6ft straight cross-dresser in the nurses' changing room; of Marion Millar, dragged into court because she tweeted a picture of suffragette ribbons; of the Scottish rape crisis centres reliant on government funding who were pressured to admit trans-identified males into their services if they wanted funding to continue.
When Sturgeon refers to an 'elevated debate', she means a discussion that takes place within a tiny, smug bubble from which regular women suffering real life consequences of her policies are firmly excluded. These faceless ants are loftily dismissed as bigots, or, to be more precise: 'transphobic, misogynistic, homophobic, maybe racist as well.'
Nicola, you hated the T-shirt picture because you couldn't ignore it, as you'd ignored so many other women trying to make you understand their concerns. Appeals to your empathy, your intelligence and your compassion all failed. Apparently the only way to get through to you is through your vanity.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gy8ub5tWcAAMVN4.jpg

2025-08-21 09:53:03 UTC

When this madness ends, which it will, one of the ugliest things to look back on will be how women weren't even allowed to the dignity of owning their sex-specific trauma. The misogyny is simply breathtaking.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gy3dfnQXEAAZHY5.jpg

2025-08-19 11:40:15 UTC

Yes, when my friends and I are talking on X, bras are definitely something we regularly discuss. It’s the perfect place to discuss our underwear. Sometimes, if @npub1jh3…hv3n hasn’t mentioned her bra for a couple of days, I DM to check if she’s ok and offer to buy her a front fastener.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GytlDhWXEAAiSB4.jpg

2025-08-18 17:41:17 UTC

This is horrifying.
https://bird.makeup/users/alinejadmasih/statuses/1957091584878813191
#note145l…0wy6

2025-08-15 18:11:57 UTC

These women and girls are in desperate need of help. Where is the international effort to liberate them?
https://bird.makeup/users/wdiafghanistan/statuses/1956416561046319440
#note153e…4yav

2025-08-07 17:55:05 UTC

Being a woman isn't an essence, it's a material, provable fact. I'm not a female human being because society or history made me one, or because I picked the 'woman' category on some metaphysical spreadsheet. I'm a woman because I was born with the equipment to produce large gametes.
My biology isn't my destiny unless I'm unfortunate enough to live in a society like Afghanistan where my femaleness is punished from birth. My biology does, however, mean I am likely to have experiences no man ever will.
If I'd been raised by robots in outer space who had no understanding of social categories or gendered norms I'd still provably be a woman, not a man. I'd certainly suffer some deprivation from not associating with other humans, but on the upside, I'd never have to listen to pseudo-intellectual drivel like this.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GxxE5pHWkAABtwp.jpg

2025-08-07 16:44:21 UTC

AI's getting too good. This cannot be real. Even Willoughby wouldn't say this.
https://bird.makeup/users/cavakaggyreborn/statuses/1953480736402559194
#note1ldx…2usm

2025-08-06 05:04:35 UTC

Freedom of speech means freedom to cause offence. The number of supposed liberals who’ve fallen at this most basic hurdle, because for the first time in their lives they risked losing the approval of their tribe, has been staggering.

2025-07-27 05:47:19 UTC

- reply

If you're claiming nobody knew Upton was a man until I said it, I would refer you to your own eyes.

2025-07-26 18:48:13 UTC

I find it offensive to be pressured into calling him ‘she’. See how that works? It’s his narcissistic injury versus my moral injury, but only one of us is demanding the dismantlement of the other one’s rights.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwzTHl8b0AAZfmx.jpg

2025-07-25 21:43:55 UTC

- reply

Honestly, someone calling themselves 'elite individual' defending the most elitist ideology ever to pretend to be a civil rights issue is just too perfect.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gwu-t52bgAEqKw6.png

2025-07-25 21:26:11 UTC

A large number of people (mostly men, in my experience) who're sympathetic to some of women's opposition to gender identity ideology, nevertheless think it's cruel to point out that a trans-identified man looks like a man, and unkind not to 'respect' his pronouns. They think these are 'compromises' women should be prepared to make. 'What does it matter?' they say. 'How does it hurt you?'
The psychological effects of being coerced, manipulated or pressured into doing something that is against a person's own beliefs or values are well known. 'Moral injury' occurs when a person is forced to betray deep-held convictions, or stand in silence while those convictions are being betrayed. The individual feels transgressed at a core level. The inevitable consequences are stress, anxiety and anger.
Workplaces across the west have imposed a Kafkaesque situation on women. A belief system most people consider nonsensical, but which, in elite circles, has become almost a religion, has been imposed from on high. Women are being persecuted and punished for not pretending they think men can change sex. The policing of pronouns, and the harassment and shaming of women who won't pretend they can't recognise a man when they see one, is merely the tip of genderism's gigantic, threatening iceberg.
Any man who seeks to force women to play along with the fantasy that he's female is engaging in a typically male power play. At worst, he will suffer narcissistic injury from her non-compliance, but that doesn't make him objectively vulnerable. The non-compliant woman, though, suffers lasting moral injury by being forced to participate daily in a lie - a lie, moreover, that constitutes a fundamental threat to her own rights to privacy, dignity and safety.
It has been profoundly illuminating to see how many people - possibly because their own values spring, not from a place of rationality or true conviction, but from fashion and self-interest - see male narcissistic injury as so very much more worthy of compassion than the moral injuries suffered by women.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gwu7apDbgAQ-Yl6.jpg

2025-07-25 10:41:17 UTC

Trust in mainstream media has never been lower, but the management class has decreed that violent and sexual crimes committed by men must be reported as female crimes if that's how the perpetrators identify. A strategy that's sure to rebuild credibility.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy5w6rw33yro

2025-07-22 05:31:15 UTC

They were waiting for the tide to turn, Rosie, so they could wriggle right to the front of the shoal, current behind them, and shout, 'follow me!'
https://bird.makeup/users/rosieduffield1/statuses/1947001891075899712
#note1ew0…7853

2025-07-21 16:28:03 UTC

You appointed men to women's posts.
You appointed men to women's posts.
You appointed men to women's posts.
You appointed men to women's posts.
You appointed men to women's posts.
You appointed men to women's posts.
You appointed men to women's posts.
https://bird.makeup/users/un_women/statuses/1946933248933670958
#note16hr…duk2

2025-07-21 06:27:16 UTC

This is horrifying.
https://bird.makeup/users/jahanzebwe/statuses/1947166408774668556
#note1lzj…8lrz

2025-07-02 17:02:24 UTC

They weren’t just acting as a taxi service for a paedophile, they were lending him protection and status. When a man like Ireland gets this cosy with police (qv Savile) the general presumption will be that he is beyond reproach and his sense of being untouchable is bolstered.
#note1pe9…duun

2025-07-01 19:48:18 UTC

- reply

98% of sex offenders are male, irrespective of how the men 'identify'. In the UK, a higher proportion of convicted sex offenders are found among trans-identifying men than in the general male prison population.
Time and again, some of the loudest and most aggressive activists in what you call the 'trans movement' have turned out to be dangerous and/or depraved. Sarah Jane Baker. Stephen Ireland. Peter Bright. Eric Joyce. Gordon Pike. Lexi Secker. David Challenor. Aiden Bunag. How many more rotten apples need to turn up before you accept that you've got a problem?
Every rational person can see that gender identity ideology offers predatory men opportunities and camouflage. If you genuinely cared about vulnerable people, especially children, you'd be sorting out your movement's very poor track record on rooting out the abusers lurking in your ranks, and stop pretending that pro-safeguarding people are the enemy.

2025-07-01 16:42:48 UTC

- reply

A movement that campaigns to keep children in a pre-pubescent state and attracts large numbers of vulnerable kids is an abuser’s dream, but to also be protected by an army of enablers who’ll shriek ‘bigot’ at anyone who raises safeguarding concerns is paedophile paradise.

2025-06-30 20:29:02 UTC

Stephen Ireland, who targeted me with endless abuse on here because I oppose the chemical castration of children and the removal of protected spaces for women and girls, has just been sentenced to 30 years in jail for child rape.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gut90HBWAAAUTk7.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gut-WRmXIAAAXYm.jpg

2025-06-29 16:32:45 UTC

When you tell a woman she must pretend a man is a woman, you’re asserting the right to control her speech and perception of reality, while also trivialising and devaluing her female-specific experience. You’re asking her to agree that ‘woman’ is a concept men can embody at will.
https://bird.makeup/@benryanwriter/1938709709600473547

2025-06-28 02:31:19 UTC

Can't say I feel very shut down, but keep at it, Pedro. God loves a trier.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Guf0XApXcAAfZ8t.jpg

2025-06-24 11:01:23 UTC

Attention all men telling me I look like a trans woman: I’m sensing that this isn’t meant as a compliment. In fact, the implication seems to be that trans women look male, or odd, or ugly. This is appallingly transphobic and I’ll thank you to take your bigotry off my timeline.

2025-06-22 18:13:20 UTC

India, a fan of a woman-hating, gay-hating, authoritarian regime? Colour me astonished.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GuEShLTXAAAvHFa.jpg

2025-06-19 08:08:34 UTC

- reply

Pre-social media I had no idea how easy it must have been to recruit for the Stasi.

2025-06-18 09:14:51 UTC

I have a superpower called eyesight.
https://bird.makeup/@transdiaries/1934879408072085951

2025-06-18 08:38:13 UTC

- reply

Exactly. Fine, I’m old and ugly and nobody ever liked my books. You’re still a man 🤷🏻‍♀️

2025-06-18 08:01:43 UTC

- reply

Narcissists can’t do humour. You have to have a stable sense of self to laugh at yourself. If your self image is so fragile it requires other human beings to become flattering mirrors, the slightest distortion in a reflection feels like a potentially lethal attack.

2025-06-17 22:06:13 UTC

I'm confident my breasts are valid, but I've always had nagging doubts about my spleen.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GtrXMMVWQAA98d5.jpg

2025-06-17 21:00:04 UTC

Let me make this as simple as possible.
An oven remains an oven even when it's not in use. It does not become a trouser press.
For the avoidance of doubt, you are the trouser press in this analogy.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GtrE99JaQAEanGL.jpg

2025-06-09 08:51:49 UTC

Just trans activists harassing Nomcebo Mkhaliphi of Swaziland, who has the temerity to call those who menstruate women and girls while she campaigns to remove period stigma. If you’d like to support her amazing work, she has a GoFundMe:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/fj52uw-menstruation-matters-by-nomcebo-mkhaliphi
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gs_VnkrXYAEQgHd.jpg

2025-06-06 10:32:20 UTC

There is no 'living as a woman.'
There is only living while being a woman, or performing a male idea of what a woman is, while being a man.

2025-06-06 10:24:44 UTC

- reply

Straight male kinksters harassing lesbians truly are the most vulnerable and oppressed of all of us.

2025-06-06 10:06:24 UTC

- reply

It isn't the Supreme Court's job to go house to house and make hot chocolate for every trans person who's disappointed to learn that women have rights, too.

2025-06-06 09:52:21 UTC

The misrepresentation in certain sections of the media of what the UK Supreme Court's recent ruling actually means is outrageous.
The ruling clarified that women and girls have sex-based rights under British law, and that those rights haven't changed since women gained them.
Trans activist lobby groups lied about what the law said. They claimed trans-identified men were entitled to everything women were entitled to, under the law. This false interpretation, which removed sex-based rights from women and girls and gave trans-identified men additional rights, may have been imposed upon large sections of society, but it was always illegal, as countless legal experts and grassroots women's groups fought to have recognised.
The Supreme Court restored to women rights they'd lost in practice. Trans-identified men lost nothing in law, because they'd never had the rights they claimed they had. The media types now hyperventilating in print because trans people's rights have been 'reduced' are still lying. Nothing has been taken from trans-identified people except a false belief, and women have simply regained what they should have had all along.

2025-06-05 22:31:36 UTC

The psychological damage done to the young women he punched, while the entire world watched and the sporting establishment jeered, shamed and gaslit them, is naturally of no importance whatsoever.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GstqAsTW4AEgv2e.jpg

2025-06-02 09:48:04 UTC

It’s a win for women because they won’t be battered to death in the ring by men.
If you had any idea what physical tests women go through routinely in their lives you’d know a cheek swab is no bigger deal than flossing your teeth.
Any more moronic questions, wing them over.
https://bird.makeup/@kaleidoscope_au/1929285366995145181

2025-05-29 18:10:40 UTC

- reply

Nothing short of women’s total capitulation will ever be good enough for them.

2025-05-27 11:33:16 UTC

If, after reading this article, you continue to pretend that it is ‘hate’ to question the advisability of surgically and chemically castrating/sterilising troubled teens, you’re either malign or dangerously stupid. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/health/2025/05/exclusive-why-wes-streeting-changed-his-mind-on-cross-sex-hormones

2025-05-26 17:33:56 UTC

I haven't ever said you're not woman enough, India.
I've said you're not a woman. Big difference.
https://bird.makeup/@indiawilloughby/1927003982498513354

2025-05-26 13:55:52 UTC

I've never attacked any woman for not being 'woman enough.' That's a concept I don't recognise. You either are, or you aren't, a woman. What I've done is say 'you are a man' to men like you, who're angry because you believe you're owed my participation in your fantasy life.
1/
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gr4UMEWXoAEROaQ.jpg

2025-05-26 09:11:01 UTC

This is a lie, and an easily provable lie. I’ve spent the best part of three decades funding initiatives and donating to charities serving vulnerable women, including domestic violence shelters. The charitable trust I set up in 2000 focuses on alleviating social deprivation, with a focus on women and children, including female refugees. I’ve funded an initiative to help female ex-prisoners secure jobs, I helped fly professional women out of Afghanistan because they were in danger from the Taliban, I’ve publicly voiced my support for women’s reproductive rights, I founded and fund a women-only rape crisis centre and I’ve campaigned for and funded projects to help single mothers.
I myself am a survivor of domestic abuse and sexual assault, as trans activists never tire of reminding me, whether to hope it happens to me again, or assert, as Maugham has, that I was left with unresolved trauma that leaves me irrational on the subject of physical risk to women.
Maugham is imploding in real time because he’s furious the Supreme Court decision put him back in his box. He was wrong on the law. He pretended it said what it doesn’t. The court reaffirmed the sex-based rights of women, but Maugham’s vanity and delusion make it impossible for him to accept (yet another) loss. So his grift continues, his lies grow bigger and more obvious, and now might be a good time for him to reread the myth of Icarus, because nobody needs clairvoyant powers to foresee how this is going to end.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gr3Tv1nXoAAQTpI.jpg

2025-05-25 21:36:11 UTC

- reply

To take a random example from your feed, what made you want to share this with the world? How many actual women do you think want to see this?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gr00uU3XYAAGd6f.jpg

2025-05-25 21:00:19 UTC

- reply

🤣 Do you think I’m Andrea Chu Long? I’ve NEVER said being female (which I am, and you’re not) means you want to be degraded or submissive. I showed you a quote by a trans-identified man who says that a female is an object that is fucked, and who also says ‘sissy porn made me trans.’ That might not have been your journey, but a lot of trans-identified men provably associate femininity with humiliation and degradation. We’ve all seen the videos and photos (in my case, very much against my will.)

2025-05-25 20:14:44 UTC

- reply

I’m talking about femaleness, not femininity. You may well be an effeminate man, and there’s nothing remotely wrong with that. You may enjoy performing femininity. This doesn’t make you female.