Kiawtzin

Is this FUD? https://npub1f3kunckqzmsxud2df6qh8c6pft00wqhla6c8yl358md4eu70825s4nh3pr.blossom.band/8c928e6783a76e0e9aea0b58c371a55c370dad1f09795a029cb802d33cfba7e3.jpg

2026-07-14 15:57:40 UTC

- reply

Dude... What idea?

2026-07-14 06:17:21 UTC

En referencia a la excomunión del SSPX me pregunto ¿Cuántos errores, abusos y herejías es necesario soportar antes de optar por la desobediencia frontal? Es una pregunta abierta. No tengo la respuesta. Pero seguro ese límite existe. Debe de existir. Dónde pintar esa raya es una pregunta compleja, pero Pintarla es obligatorio. ...o dicho de otra forma ¿El eterno y descarado regodeo en errores, abusos y herejías jamás amerita una desobediencia frontal? osea ¿La obediencia prometida debe ser infinita incondicional y eterna?

2026-07-03 08:14:12 UTC

- reply

Unfortunately that is the case for every single topic. Thats not an exclusive vulnerabilty of the Bitcoin topic. That said, unfortunately the bulk of the Bitcoin discussion is made there and the dumpster fire drama is not gratuitious. It reflects the high stakes and the importance of the discussion.

2026-06-27 06:15:22 UTC

- reply

Im sorry you got grilled for not having a strong opinion on BIP110. I personally think was a bit over the top. The emotions are runnng high and the mood is heated as a reflection of how truly important this dilemma is. I can't speak for everyone on this side (the pro BIP110), but just for myself, however I'll explain my feelings using "we" because I think you can mostly generalize: We are worried and upset because we are seing this beautiful thing a lot of us care so much about is getting damaged. Bitcoin the perfect money, the one thing capable of separating money and state being corrupted from within. We see spam as something that damages Bitcoin as money. We see the corruption from within Core as an insult to the History of the fights and all the work it took to build the system. We see the change in philosphy towards spam permissiveness as a dangerous mission creep that has to be corrected in order to keep Bitcoin working as the best money that it is supposed to be. We think not standing up to uproot this corruption will end up destroying Bitcoin's soul. The Bitcoin telos is crystal clear money" and the current crop of coredevs is completely detached from it. Most of them dont even believe there is a Bitcoin telos. So they're misguided priorities have no bounding philosophical princilple and they're lost to their postmodern nihilism worldview where Bitcoin can be whatever "the market" decides. so they cater to "usecases"... If this is not stopped and course corrected, Bitcoin becomes decentralized cloud file storage, THEN IN CANNOT SEPARATE MONEY AND STATE, AND IT WONT BE the world's best money. It will be inevitably get more centralized because there will be less and less nodes and it will eventually die as the one chance at freedom money for all mankind. It will live as a SOV asset, and will probably keep going up in price but it will die. It's soul will die.
So from our part this is a battle for the soul of Bitcoin and to save the most important financial tool in human history. The stakes are THIS high. So I think that's the reason why you see people getting angry towards those defending spammers and also towards those not speaking out.
Me, personally I wont grill you and call you names for not taking a stance.
Though I have to say that I think it is a failure of character to not be able to recognize how important this battle is and how big your impact can be.
It's not a purity test, It's a character test. I'm rooting for you to pass it. You are one of my favorite bitcoiners Joe. I like you a lot. Cheers!

2026-06-27 03:36:34 UTC

- reply

Its a good observation. Its the same pattern: Self proclaimed authorities imposing its views and labeling dissent as plebslop, technically ignorants etc.

2026-06-24 01:22:00 UTC

Arroz con leche receta de la abuela
Ingredientes:
Una tarde de lluvia, arroz, leche, piloncillo, pasas, canela, cardamomo, una lata de clavel, una lata de lechera, caso de cobre y mucho amor.
Mézclese todo al calor de la estufa, compártase. ❤️ https://npub1f3kunckqzmsxud2df6qh8c6pft00wqhla6c8yl358md4eu70825s4nh3pr.blossom.band/593e26e6efdfd57de0892c3f37654471b71f63f74b9775047491a6c4cb210088.jpg

2026-06-23 20:56:17 UTC

- reply

This is a good reminder that back there in xitter your speech is not yours. You are only ALLOWED to speak as long as what you say is not threatening to those who hold your leash. But as soon as your speech is dangerous to them you are silenced. Post everything here Cato. Please.

2026-06-09 02:10:53 UTC

Well saod
#nevent1q…k0vx

2026-06-07 05:53:53 UTC

- reply

You can absolutely add value.

2026-06-06 16:05:02 UTC

- reply

Muy interesante

2026-06-04 23:32:17 UTC

- reply

Me gustaría poder concordar. Pero últimamente he visto a tantos "Bitcoiners" abrazar el lado oscuro y corromperse ante malos incentivos que ya no sé.

2026-06-02 22:25:45 UTC

- reply

Finished listening. Awesome convo. Thanks to you both

2026-06-02 01:06:38 UTC

Tell me you dont run a relay without telling me you dont run a relay
#nevent1q…v23r

2026-06-01 23:16:00 UTC

- reply

What a treat!

2026-06-01 23:10:23 UTC

- reply

this one also seems to be deleted. I cant see it anymore. https://blossom.primal.net/8867810f202f51cb445f9c5acdba292bfb19de8106f336acf4409a075053bcc9.png

2026-06-01 22:59:56 UTC

- reply

So you want everyone to believe that a group of peers rejected 3 times the lead seedsigner developer without you getting involved? ... suure! And the seedsigner domain squatting and your bad faith against the project is just a coincidence.

2026-05-30 16:58:09 UTC

- reply

Pregunta tal vez tonta: Qué ventajas tiene una comunidad local con servidor propio vs usar la infraestructura descentralizada de mostro así como está?

2026-05-30 16:53:25 UTC

- reply

+99% de los usuarios potenciales de NOSTR son normies. Para ellos mientras más se pueda imitar la UX de facebook, mejor. Todas las opciones avanzadas y la complejidad oculta.

2026-05-28 19:02:35 UTC

- reply

So what version of URSF are you running LARPER?

2026-05-28 18:08:47 UTC

- reply

"a little unfair" that's a understatement. It's an outright malicious antitruth.

2026-05-28 18:04:23 UTC

- reply

1. He's not my hero.
2. I wont follow him blindly which proves to you that at least I'm capable of thinking for myself and come to conclusions on my own. Unlike you that have to ask your drunk hero Odell to tell you if you have to run a URSF or not and then thank God when he misleads you into not running one.
3. *IF* bitcoin distributes something egregious or universally ilegal/ immoral would you happily run a node given that you would actively be participating in such distribution?
4. Why are you opposing the efforts to disincentivize data embedding in Bitcoin? That's the objective BIP110

2026-05-28 17:48:45 UTC

- reply

Enhorabuena! qué bonita noticia Fernando. Larga vida a toda la familia. Dios los siga bendiciendo.

2026-05-28 17:46:31 UTC

- reply

"centralized mining attack" WTF Odell What kind of booze are you drinking today? That's peak idiocy. Ocean itself havent officially declared support for BIP110. their blocks are not signalling. But you know that already. You're just spittting BS.

2026-05-28 17:20:58 UTC

- reply

I already answered your question clearly.
Now you answer this question: What kind of URSF are you running or advocating for?
#nevent1q…7uph

2026-05-28 16:51:40 UTC

- reply

1. It wont fail if there is no active opposition. You asked Odell to think for you and he misled you.
2. I have no intention of trying to get Bitcoin banned
3. I have no idea what you mean by "like luke says he will". Source?

2026-05-28 16:45:24 UTC

- reply

You are the guy who outsourced your thinking to Odell because you cant use your brain to determine if it is true that you have to actively resist BIP110 with a URSF? DUuuude! Are you sure its going to fail? What kind of URSF are you running or advocating for?

2026-05-28 15:47:10 UTC

- reply

TLDR in english: You are an imbecile for first ignoring and now attacking the efforts to fix the "something disgusting" vulnerability. and now you are malliciously projecting yourself when you accuse us to be the ones who will do it.

2026-05-28 15:43:59 UTC

- reply

No Odell, no entiendes nada "just fine". Tu respuesta es un lindo castillo fortificado de Brandolini que te construiste a ciegas con entendimiento a medias, filias y fobias desde donde te sientes muy agusto siendo zapeado por tus patiños. No voy a perder mi tiempo aclarando todas y cada una de tus acusaciones ridículas, interpretaciones maliciosas y exageraciones.
Bitcoin sufre de una vulnerabilidad de inserción de datos aleatorios ("something disgusting" le llamas) y tú, y tus amigotes apoyados en buena parte por la organización de financiamiento que presides no sólo se han negado consistentemente a parcharla o siquiera mitigarla sino que se han dedicado a retirar las protecciones a nivel de política que han hecho el problema más grave. Tu lado en este conficto ha cerrado todas y cada una de las propuestas para corregir ese riesgo de inserción de cosas asquerosas. El hecho de que ahora tú preventivamente nos acuses a nosotros de hacer lo que queremos evitar es francamente malicioso. Llevamos YA AÑOS suplicando y haciendo todo tipo de propuestas para que se corrija esa vulnerabilidad y todo este tiempo tú calladito sin poner atención mientras la tensión subía y las protecciones se seguían retirando. Pero ahora sí te indignas porque se propuso un soft fork para arreglar en consenso las estupideces de tus minions. Si te preocupa tanto que alguien ponga alguna pendejada en la blockchain ¿¿¿PORQUÉ NO APOYAS QUE SE PARCHE LA VULNERABILIDAD??? no, en vez de eso nos acusas de que ser nosotros los que cometeremos el crimen. Es gente imbécil como tú la que se niega a parchar esa vulnerabilidad. Odell honestamente. Vete a la mierda con tus acusaciones.

2026-05-28 03:37:48 UTC

- reply

Why dont you better think for yourself. Odell has failed time and time again to understand BIP110. Asking him if what Mechanic is true or not Is ridiculous.

2026-05-27 16:01:45 UTC

- reply

yes please

2026-05-26 14:21:54 UTC

- reply

F! missed it

2026-05-19 17:57:41 UTC

- reply

Si esta gente ve a Bitcoin de esta manera, implícitamente lo están identificando como un activo crítico en la guerra cibernética. Si es cierto o falso que Bitcoin puede ser usado como ciber defensa, eso es secundario. Esta gente lo ve así. Lo que significa que harán TODO lo posible para controlarlo.
No sé qué espera Saylor hacer para evitar el inminente 6102 que el ejército gringo le va a aplicar a sus Bitcoin IOU's de Coinbase excusados por la seguridad nacional. LOL.

2026-03-02 19:21:48 UTC

- reply

Cry more, degenerate tranny shitcoiner

2026-02-26 15:07:38 UTC

- reply

You will defend Libre RealyGhey for a minority that forces garbage on to a everyone's nodes via pref peering and OOB direct submission; but then rail against 110 for being a minority that can force a majority to "change consensus". How do you reconcile these 2?

2026-02-26 14:57:38 UTC

- reply

I would agree that the precedent is not optimal. but terrible? that's just one opinion. There are other very bad precedents and factors at play that you are not paying enough attention or considering properly IMO.
I think that the precedent of allowing an economically illiterage smug clique of corrupt devs to continue degrading the monetary quality of Bitcoin, not fixing bugs, leaving open attack vectors and exploits, increasing the legal and moral risk, encumbering nodes and endangering node decentralization into the future... those are worse. WAY worse precedents. Each one of those is worse IMO than what you think is a "terrible precedent".
The change is good you accept that. And the only possible bad outcomes would be real in extreme scenarios where enough mining pools get misled and stuck in rigid ideological restraints like the ones you so effectively spread. If the support from the broad community in pressuring the pools to signal BIP110 is strong enough ALL the doomsday scenarios go away and we have a clean non disruptive upgrade that would be good for Bitcoin and the world.

2026-02-25 17:35:44 UTC

- reply

Ignore the personal attacks Matt. Its true There's been no shortage of those from all sides. If I said something personally offensive to you I take it back. I honestly think you are not a bad apple. Or malicious. Its just that you are not showing your best in your engagement with this issue. I'm pointing to you a video that has ZERO insults or personal attacks. All I'm saying is deal WITH THE ARGUMENTS of the BIP stop engaging with strawmen.

2026-02-25 17:29:26 UTC

- reply

I invoke the 2019 (ish) Cypherpunk Odell spirit to come back and reanimate this 2026 Odell carcass!

2026-02-25 16:39:49 UTC

- reply

Matt. Respectfully.
I know you are a busy man but I'm willing to bet that nothing that you have to do (workwise) is more important right now than to engage with these arguments and contend with them. Matthew has done an in depth reaction to your anti BIP110 position. In my opinion reflects very well the feelings and thoughts of most plebs and points out your shortcomings in understanding the proposal and its implications. You have already wasted enough time ignoring this problem and avoided engaging with it. The stakes are now higher than ever and the danger is real. I encourage you to DO THE WORK that you haven't done. Take the time to listen to it if you care for Bitcoin. You are willing to accuse us of being bad faith, and saying we're attacking Bitcoin etc... the least you can do is to hear what we are saying, respond to our arguments and stop beating the strawman you have inside your head.
I look forward to your reaction of the reaction video.... or whatever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FNPeqyk7c0

2026-02-24 15:50:29 UTC

- reply

I was going to argue that you are confusing the defenders with the attackers... But then I remembered that you are MrHodl and have proven to be unable to understand that or acknowledge any argument. There's no point in wasting my time. All I'm going to say is that maybe, just maybe your'e just an economically iliterate stubborn opinionated pigheaded jerk and not a malicious corrupted actor. I decide to give you the benefit of the doubt. We will see.

2026-02-24 02:09:00 UTC

- reply

It's a permissionless system. You dont have to like it and you dont have to run BIP110 and you dont have to mine there. Why are you such a Karen about what other people run in their nodes dude?. It's PER MI SSION LESS! If it's a silly dead on arrival idea as you have said 1000 times then it'll never activate. Dont worry! And if it does... Then remember that you are free to GFY + URSF = GFURSF

2026-02-22 02:19:06 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/00b50d504a53bbfcd1e58f72a63e748405e44e999ac40a7c92a8c1e3406c5ed5.png

2026-02-21 21:20:26 UTC

- reply

I agree.
But not for the reasons you might think.

2026-02-21 21:08:05 UTC

Friendly reminder that in the Bitcoin hierarchy nodes are at the top. The nodes are the boss, not the miners. The nodes are the ones who decide the changes NOT the miners. Nodes set the rules and miners obey those rules. The nodes PAY the miners. The miners are the node's employees. Never forget that because there is now an attempt by spammers, corrupted influenzors, to psyop plebs, to subvert this very healthy hierarchy and to portray miners as if they can oppose BIP110 and decide if it activates or not. THE TRUTH IS THAT MINER'S CAN'T. DONT FALL FOR IT, ITS A PSYOP. If the nodes want BIP110, then the miner's will obey because they are not stupid. They know who's paying them 3.125BTC/block. They know who gives Bitcoin value. They wont risk that to earn pennies mining big OpReturns.
https://blossom.primal.net/54d6bae7e67e93212f73ad5038acf4137e682d153f343ec980d15a81a8d1f926.png

2026-02-21 20:23:10 UTC

- reply

Sí caray... justo en eso estoy ahora mismo volviendo a echar a andar mi nodo LN para poderlo conectar porque desas carteras de custodia me salen ronchas jaja! pronto pronto 😉 Mira de información te recomiendo de entrada este sitio https://bip110.org/ es un buen hub de información acerca de la propuesta.
Pero en general y en resúmen: La idea es que Bitcoin está siendo explotado como depósito de datos arbitrarios como si fuera una nube distribuida. Esa es una distorsión de su objetivo inicial, de su ethos y de su función y diseño que desde el principio ha sido la de ser dinero. BIP110 se propone restringir los datos aleatorios uqe se pueden subir en las transacciones y arreglando los bugs de taproot que están siendo explotados para subir jps, ordinales, etc. y codificar en las reglas de consenso que Bitcoin es DINERO y sólamente dinero, NO UN DEPÓSITO DE DATOS ARBITRARIOS. Tiene un componente técnico muy bien armado y complejo pero en mi perspectiva no es una propuesta esencialmente técnica sino filosófica. ¿Qué es Bitcoin en esencia y en qué debería de utilizarse los recursos de los nodos? La respuesta de BIP110 es: DINERO Y SÓLO DINERO.

2026-02-21 19:24:34 UTC

- reply

Si no entiendes bien la historia detrás del conflicto, el problema que se propone corregir y los detalles de la propuesta BIP110 (lo cual es completamente comprensible) lo mejor es no tomar partido aúny comenzar por entrarle esos temas. Este problema lleva más de dos años cuajándose y mucha gente no hacía más que voltear la cabeza a un lado, minimizar el problema, burlárse, acusar de ignorantes iletrados, y gaslightear a quienes lo señalábamos. Ahora que la el softfork comienza a agarrar fuerza y popularidad y ven las muy reales posibilidades de que se active, AHORA ENTONCES sacan las uñas y nos acusan no solamente de pendejos sino de malaleches, atacando la red, etc... Son puras patadas de ahogado de quien no quería ver el problema ni enfrentarse a los argumentos y le reventó el problema en la cara. Odell es un amigacho y colega inversionista de muchos de los peores estafadores shitcoineros y spammers en el "ecosistema". Está entre la espada y la pared y todas sus opiniones acerca de BIP110 hay que entenderlas con el filtro de todos sus intereses. Esta crítica nisiquiera es una crítica, es una vil y descarada falacia ad-hominem. Yo a la orden para compartir información y perspectivas contigo cuando quieras. Saludos.

2026-02-21 17:55:09 UTC

- reply

For you own reputaion's sake, I sincerely hope that you will take the time to engage in good faith with his arguments (and the BIP11O's arguments and rationale in general) and the things he responds to you here. In the meanwhile, this post is just another cheap ineffective ad-hominem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_aOb0Mru28

2026-02-21 14:26:12 UTC

- reply

Every single new rule, law, in every governance system ever didn't have "consensus" when first proposed or conceived. Every. Single. One. Ever. That's not a problem for BIP110 nor a valid argument against it. The consensus for BIP110 is being built and looks promising.

2026-02-21 14:19:58 UTC

- reply

Didn't you read what I just said? You are also stuck in the nirvana/strawman double fallacy. Honest question. Have you even read the BIP documentation?

2026-02-21 02:03:51 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…3p6h

2026-02-21 00:13:13 UTC

- reply

You are fighting a windmill Matt. "Wont stop spam" is a strawman/nirvana double fallacy. BIP110 's purpose has never been to stop spam. It RATE LIMITS spam as a bonus good to have second order effect. But its real purpose is that by activating it Bitcoin will assert in the clearest strongest way possible (which is set it in consensus) that it's only valid usecase is to be MONEY and not arbitrary data storage. This has been repeated ad nauseum. Don't you agree with the premise?

2026-02-20 02:19:12 UTC

- reply

Hey long time non-coder client here. Is there a reason why you haven't implemented the loan rollout option?

2026-02-20 02:03:11 UTC

- reply

BIP110 proposes to fix incentives and screw the scammers but even though you re so soul hurt about the problem you somehow have found a way to justify not supporting it while being close friend of some of the worst scammers. Can't you see the performative contradiction?

2026-01-29 00:17:03 UTC

- reply

Meow!

2025-10-13 13:12:44 UTC

- reply

Se te pasaron las 3 cosas más importantes: descentralización , seguridad y dureza monetaria.

2025-09-26 22:53:15 UTC

- reply

Can she really hurt you? What's the ROI on that trial? Is it worth it?

2025-09-02 04:30:54 UTC

- reply

Well said Sir
I agree with your 3 first thoughts. Slightly disagree with the fourth. I explain myself:
Yes the blocksize is capped and that ensures the bockchain growth won't be overblown... But that's not the real problem. There is no UTXO set size limit and Spam is making the utxo set grow orders of magnitude faster than the price of RAM. That centralization force is what makes me and others worry. Dismiss it as not a big deal is unwise. The attackers like Mikeinspace and others have clearly bragged unambiguously that they intend to spam the network in the most toxic and harmful way possible so they are NOT going to stop their stamps that bloat the UTXo set

2025-07-10 06:24:29 UTC

- reply

GM! Are the hospital worries over now? I hope everyone is fine !

2025-04-30 04:20:43 UTC

- reply

Siempre he pensado que el killer use case de NOSTR es en algo así como periodismo, noticias y organizaciónes con necesidades de comunicación resistentes a la censura, O con necesidades de privacidad... Esas son las características más únicas y novedosas de este protocolo... Pero EDUCACIÓN?! No se me había ocurrido pensar en eso. Debe haber oportunidades muy interesantes también en ese sector.

2025-04-30 04:15:19 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…dagv

2025-04-24 04:03:33 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…pkcu

2025-04-05 22:57:33 UTC

- reply

ooh and I forgot essentially free and instantaneous transactions!! OMG!🤯

2025-04-05 22:54:36 UTC

- reply

Does this mean that in the near future we can have money that:
-Is as scarce as Bitcoin
-Is unforgeable
-Perfectly fungible
-Globally transmissible at the speed of light
-As private as physical cash
-AND it is impossible for the issuer to rug you?
Am I understanding this correctly?
Sounds too good to be true. Utterly amazing! Incredible!

2025-04-04 16:42:56 UTC

- reply

I ❤️ Danaus plexippus
#nevent1q…lgwv

2025-04-04 16:41:26 UTC

- reply

It will be painful to share a Guardian article... But I'll do it! Thanks for the news.

2025-04-04 16:37:08 UTC

- reply

There are MANY cities in Mexico where you can drink directly from the tap.... Also None of that water is fluor in it. You can't say the same about all that "potable" water in the US.

2025-04-03 19:57:51 UTC

- reply

I have an idea of a usecase. I cant imagine this being built without NOSTR Ustoppable Money payment system integration. How would you pay for tips against terrorists in Bluesky? Please enter your Paypal? Visa? LOL!
ALSO this usecase would need absolute censorship resistance that comes from true decentralization.
Id love to reas what you think
#nevent1q…agu7

2025-03-31 13:55:39 UTC

- reply

Excelente! Buen trabajo

2025-03-31 13:51:25 UTC

- reply

They are not buying any Bitcoin. Just a bunch of IOU's. I know precision is annoying. Sorry.

2025-03-31 13:29:44 UTC

"Save in Bitcoin. Focus on your craft" what a beautiful motto. A truly wise prescription full of meaning and purpose. A whole philosophy of life in 7 words

2025-03-31 13:22:42 UTC

- reply

GM! Jimmy Cheers!

2025-03-28 18:23:37 UTC

- reply

Is there a client that is not like that or worse?

2025-03-27 22:50:59 UTC

- reply

Ok man, but 19 or 21 year olds are also bursting with fresh eggs. and maybe even more healthy ones at that. So Why do you like this one better? Does the fact that she is 13 makes you more attracted?

2025-03-24 19:16:35 UTC

- reply

TLDR: Si eres pendejo no compres Bitcoin.
#nevent1q…rvp6

2025-03-22 02:47:38 UTC

- reply

What gives you the boner? Her body or the fact that she's 13?

2025-03-17 19:47:01 UTC

- reply

*Idiots

2025-03-17 19:46:31 UTC

- reply

Only Idiota hate.

2025-02-19 21:21:40 UTC

- reply

Id like to read it too. Would you share a link?

2025-02-19 16:25:20 UTC

- reply

Amazing lets make networks
#nevent1q…kam0

2025-02-19 16:23:43 UTC

- reply

Its amazing that people will just zap you for no good reason just for reposting. We are so early in nostr. In some years things like this will be remembered like the Bitcoin faucet.
#nevent1q…482w

2025-02-19 05:06:28 UTC

- reply

Very very very interested.

2025-02-15 21:13:34 UTC

- reply

I posted this on twatter yesterday. Ive never paid for bluecheck marks so Im semi shadowbanned and as expected nobody has seen the post. Lets see how this fare in NOSTR (where it belongs) ¿Has anyone talked about this usecase before?
#nevent1q…v9dy

2025-02-15 20:08:36 UTC

Hey @DHSgov @FBI @CIA @ODNI_NCTC @DeptofDefense Now that the mexican cartels are recognized as terrorist organizations… I have a good idea to help you fuck them up: a NOSTR-based anonymous tip system. Please hear me out:
You could use the anonymous decentralized communication protocol NOSTR to your (and our) advantage to help turn the Mexican population's disdain for the cartels into actionable intelligence. WIN-WIN (only the cartels lose)
In Mexico, there's no love lost for these fuckers. They're hated, feared, but most importantly, people want them gone. Leveraging NOSTR you can encourage tips from within their own communities, from those who know their operations best.
Here's how it could work: Law enforcement posts requests for information on NOSTR. A mysterious NPUB comes with an amazing tip. If the lead is confirmed to be good n lead to a significant outcome, like an arrest or disruption of operations, the NPUB gets zapped accordingly.
ANONYMITY is key. Using NOSTR, informants can remain completely untraceable, ensuring their safety while providing you with crucial intel. Like this you don't just catch the bad guys; but also protect those willing to help.
SPEED is also huge. Bitcoin zaps are instantaneous, untraceable, and direct while checks wiretransfers and bank accounts are useless to gather Mexican population's intel. But with zaps you can tap into an unexplored source of information and make your operations more dynamic
This system would be a force multiplier. There are THOUSANDS of eyes & ears across Mexico motivated to reclaim the country from cartel control. The problem people face is “How can I give this information out without getting killed” NOSTR has the incentives already alligned
There’s crowdsourcing with platforms like Crime Stoppers. But this takes it to another level, leveraging NOSTR for privacy and speed. It's not just about tips; it's about building the population’s confidence that they can help fight against those fuckers.
I don’t know about your legal frameworks but I’m sure you can work it out. Senator @BasedMikeLee You have proposed letters of marque already… I think you’ll find this idea interesting. And if you back it I’m sure you can find legal ways to make it happen.
Icall on all relevant officials, from @Sec_Noem at DHS to @Kash_Patel at the FBI, to consider this proposal seriously. We all know Mexican authorities are all in the front pocket of the cartels. They’ll never do something like this but the people in affected communities not only in Mexico but also within the USA are fed up and most are willing to help to strike at the heart of cartel operations. Anyone leveraging NOSTR’s anonymity and integrated payment system could harness that will to get VALUABLE INFORMATION.
This wouldn’t be just another tool in the fight; this could be a narrative game changer. This would give power back to the people making every good citizen a potential defender of peace. If you don’t think this is a good idea is because you haven’t thought about it enough.
I'm speaking about your war on the Mexican terrorist cartels because just because this is where I live but NOSTR is a global system, so it has not escaped my notice that this could (and eventually will) be applied globally
@DHSgov @FBI @CIA @DeptofDefense you can make technological reality work in your favor. Get your NPUB, load up your lightning wallets with sats for tips and start posting on NOSTR, build your own web of trust and start zapping the correct people on the field!

2025-01-22 07:12:27 UTC

- reply

OMG trump what have you done to this poor young man! 🤣
#nevent1q…0u7h

2024-12-15 03:02:50 UTC

- reply

*Full

2024-12-15 03:02:18 UTC

- reply

Film nostr entonces

2024-11-22 19:42:59 UTC

- reply

Specifically on the topics of "Exosomes vs viruses" and "terrain hypothesis" What readings would you recommend?

2024-11-22 19:40:14 UTC

- reply

A text like this would really benefit from having a robust section of references, sources, links to other proper scientific research. But there is nothing. Sure I can look into the alternative hypothesis myself but the author of this text really missed an oportunity to guide us readers in the path by showing some proof his own research.

2024-09-05 09:26:19 UTC

- reply

Ir tan lejos en el futuro a una humanidad multiplanetaria fue un ejercicio mental muy divertido... Felicidades por ese podcast lo he recomendado a decenas de personas en mi círculo. Creo que nadie lo ha escuchado. Jajaja
#nevent1q…5ps4

2024-09-05 09:16:51 UTC

- reply

Replicar idéntico... es imposible, estoy de acuerdo. Pero estoy seguro que los futuros colonizadores de las lunas de saturno y Júpiter podrán inventar un equivalente que les funcione. Todo pasa por el consenso. Si hay una mezcla de inventivos correcta la gente lo aceptará...

2024-09-05 05:56:59 UTC

- reply

Escuché dos veces tu pod de astronomía Bitcoin. ¡Muuy interesante! Tu invitado no cree que Bitcoin puede ser replicado. ¿Coincides con él? ¿Quisiera saber qué opinas acerca de eso?

2024-09-02 18:13:53 UTC

What's a good straightforward way to configure a relay in an android phone?

2024-09-02 18:00:39 UTC

- reply

El evento terminó.

2024-09-02 15:46:59 UTC

- reply

I'm having ideas about something elses. Have you?
#nevent1q…3m5m

2024-09-02 15:45:25 UTC

- reply

Can you explain what you envision this permissionlesness will be used for?
#nevent1q…3m5m

2024-09-02 15:43:26 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…3m5m

2024-09-02 15:41:07 UTC

- reply

Is there like an app for that?

2024-09-02 15:28:39 UTC

Live Chat con Kiawtzin #3
https://cornychat.com/twicefoam760
Use your npub to log in
Temas sugeridos:-La batalla de @EricRWeinstein vs el establishment académico de la física quántica moderna
-La puesta en práctica de las teorías de @JasonPLowery sobre el recién emergido territorio digital que es #nostr
-La reputación y la confiabilidad de Jack Dorsey
-Trae tu propio tema

2024-09-02 10:36:10 UTC

- reply

I think those are two different distributions and there is obviously an overlap. I dont know how big though maybe it is impossible to measure.
Im all for all the "othery" and "somethingelsy" possibilities. The permissionlessness is absolutely mindboggling.

2024-08-31 19:22:17 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…q3mu