kp
Καλέβιος

Kalevios Pontikos ☧ | Follower of Iēsous, son of the unknown Good Father. Citizen of His Kingdom. Student of early Christianity. Unashamed heretic.

Public Key

npub1v9vm3606g9dhrdemxkhx35q3m2kza5l3xzezgdjggs9fxsgyp5wqt0tqnj

NIP-05 Address

kp@kalevios.com

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsxzkdca8ayzkm3kuanttng6qga4tpw60cnpv3yxeyygz5ngyzq68qpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds5vlrqg

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1v9vm3606g9dhrdemxkhx35q3m2kza5l3xzezgdjggs9fxsgyp5wqt0tqnj

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-09 03:38:04 UTC

Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:27)
This command in the First New Testament reveals the Good Father’s radical mercy — love that exceeds Yahweh’s “eye for eye” justice. It is the fruit of being children of the merciful One, not the wrathful deity of the Hebrews.

2026-07-05 04:15:53 UTC

Right now is all there is, tomorrow isn’t a given.

2026-06-24 06:26:40 UTC

Micah 5:2 is not about Iēsous.
In context (8th cent. BCE Assyrian crisis), it promises a ruler from Bethlehem Ephrathah (David’s clan) who’ll shepherd Israel after military deliverance. The Hebrew “whose origin is from of old, from ancient days [ʿôlām]” refers to the antiquity of the Davidic line—not personal pre-existence.
ʿÔlām means a long but finite/unknown span of time (Biglino: “eternity doesn’t exist in Biblical Hebrew”), not timelessness. David was from Bethlehem; by Micah’s day the dynasty was already centuries old.
The Christian individual-Messiah-from-Bethlehem reading (Matthew 2:5-6) is eisegesis.
The earliest Gospel has no birth narrative—no Bethlehem, no genealogy. Iēsous simply descends into Capernaum revealing the Good God. The infancy stories were later redactions tying him to the Creator’s framework.

2026-06-24 04:26:51 UTC

YHWH allowed Job to be tormented as a pawn in a cruel wager: loss of all wealth, the violent death of his ten children, and crippling physical affliction.
Would Iēsous ever do this? Never.
He taught us plainly that evil cannot come from the Good. In fact, when addressed as “Good Teacher,” Iēsous Himself replied:
“Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.” (Luke 18:19 // Mark 10:18)
Iēsous explicitly disclaims the title “good” for Himself and reserves it for His Father alone — the wholly Good God. Further proof that YHWH (the one who creates evil and torments the righteous) is not that Father.
A good tree cannot bear bad fruit.
“No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit, for each tree is known by its own fruit.” (Luke 6:43–44)
We are commanded to reject evil:
“Let love be genuine. Abhor what is evil; hold fast to what is good.” (Romans 12:9)
Yet the creator openly claims responsibility for evil:
“I form light and create darkness; I make well-being and create evil; I am YHWH, who does all these things.” (Isaiah 45:7)
“Does disaster come to a city, unless YHWH has done it?” (Amos 3:6)
Contrast this with the Father of Iēsous, who is kind even to the ungrateful and evil:
“Love your enemies, and do good… and you will be sons of the Most High, for he is kind to the ungrateful and the evil.” (Luke 6:35)
The fruit of YHWH is the polar opposite of the fruit of Iēsous and His Father. By the standard Iēsous Himself gave us—we must judge by fruit—YHWH stands condemned as a very different being.
YHWH ≠ Iēsous.
YHWH ≠ the Good Father.

2026-06-23 04:02:00 UTC

Yahweh (the Elohim of Israel): “Make the heart of this people dull, and their ears heavy, and blind their eyes” (Isaiah 6:10).
Iēsous (revealing the Good Father): Heals the blind and opens their eyes (Evangelion, cf. Luke 18:35-43).
Yahweh blinds minds and hardens hearts; the alien Good Father through Iēsous grants sight and understanding. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-23 00:18:11 UTC

Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be satisfied. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:21)
This beatitude in the New Testament promises the Good Father’s reversal: those hungering under the Yahweh's scarcity will be filled in His kingdom. No Law-piety or works — pure grace satisfies.

2026-06-22 06:25:15 UTC

This cookie bear looks like he’s been given the Marcion treatment of the Damnatio Memoriae. https://image.nostr.build/aa23a182481fef47a898a684b4ef50704ea7603b9dc2d86d9b36398c2b12154c.jpg

2026-06-22 05:08:54 UTC

Yahweh (the Elohim of Israel): Commands the Hebrews to despoil the Egyptians of gold, silver and clothing (Exodus 3:22; 11:2; 12:35-36).
Iēsous (revealing the Good Father): “Take nothing for your journey, no staff, nor bag, nor bread, nor money” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 9:3).
Yahweh incites plunder and acquisition; the alien Good Father through Iēsous reveals radical dependence without materialism. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-22 04:38:07 UTC

But the one who hears and does not do is like a man who built a house on the ground without a foundation. When the flood came, the stream broke against that house, and it fell immediately, and the ruin of that house was great. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:49)
This closing image in the Sermon on the Plain shows the Good Father’s words demand action — hearing alone leaves one exposed to the collapse of the Yahweh's unstable order. Fruit reveals true trust.

2026-06-19 04:34:51 UTC

Friendly reminder: I'm an unashamed heretic.

2026-06-19 04:24:47 UTC

Church fathers lumped Marcion in with the Gnostics, painting him as lost in wild myths and secret knowledge.
Reality: He rejected their aeons, emanations, and demiurge fantasies. His was crisp Paulinist dualism — the Good Father (alien God of mercy) vs Yahweh, the just but limited creator of this world.
No esoteric mazes, just the plain Evangelion of grace.
Marcion kept it simpler and truer to Paul. Judge the fruit: freedom from Law.

2026-06-19 01:44:58 UTC

I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 18:25)
This stark saying in the First New Testament exposes how attachment to the Yahweh's material order blocks entry into the Good Father’s kingdom — radical trust in Iēsous, not wealth or Law-observance, is the path of rescue.

2026-06-19 01:35:56 UTC

Daughter, your faith has rescued you; go in peace. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 8:48)
This word from Iēsous in the First New Testament to the woman suffering twelve years of bleeding shows the Good Father’s immediate, personal rescue through trust alone — cutting through Yahweh’s purity codes, isolation, and temple barriers with unmediated grace.

2026-06-18 23:09:01 UTC

Why "Alien" for the Good Father?
In the earliest Christian proclamation (Evangelion & Apostolicon), the Good God — the merciful Father revealed by Christ — is alien to this present world order. He's not the god who currently rules it.
YHWH openly said he blinded the people (Isa 6:9-10). Paul confirms: the "god of this age" has blinded minds (2 Cor 4:4); he's the "prince of the power of the air" (Eph 2:2). That's the ruler of this realm of law, judgment and death.
Jesus put it plainly to the Pharisees: "You are of your father the devil" (Jn 8:44). Their father isn't the Good Father of compassion and grace.
The Good God is foreign — unknown here until Christ revealed Him. No mixing the two. Pure deliverance, unconditioned love. Judge by the fruit.

2026-06-18 06:27:37 UTC

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): Commands the stoning of a man for gathering sticks on the Sabbath (Numbers 15:32-36).
Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “The Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:5).
The Elohim of Israel enforces deadly legalism for minor infractions; the alien Good God reveals sovereign mercy and freedom. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-17 23:25:50 UTC

Your faith has rescued you. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 8:48)
This declaration in the New Testament to the woman with the issue of blood reveals the Good Father’s rescue as immediate and personal through trust in Christ — bypassing Yahweh’s purity laws, temple rituals, and social exclusion.

2026-06-17 03:30:08 UTC

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): “Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors” is not enough—He demands ritual, sacrifice, and ongoing Law observance (cf. Leviticus).
Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “Forgive, and you will be forgiven” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:37).
The Elohim of Israel ties forgiveness to legal performance; the alien Good God reveals unconditioned grace and mutual mercy. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-17 01:39:00 UTC

Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 11:4)
This petition in the New Testament reveals the merciful economy of the wholly Good Father — forgiveness flows freely as grace, not earned through Yahweh’s retributive system of sacrifices and conditions.

2026-06-16 12:03:18 UTC

Jesus is the Son of the Father—not the Father Himself. The text confirms this.
In Luke 8:45–46, He asks, 'Who touched me?' sensing power go out from Him. This shows limited knowledge in the moment—He isn’t omnipresent like the Father.
John 14:28: 'The Father is greater than I.'
They are distinct, with the Son subordinate. Early Christology wasn’t the later Nicene Trinity.

2026-06-16 07:02:47 UTC

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): “Cursed be anyone who does not confirm the words of this law by doing them” (Deuteronomy 27:26).
Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “Woe to you lawyers also! For you load people with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not touch the burdens with one of your fingers” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 11:46).
The Elohim of Israel curses under the heavy yoke of Law; the alien Good God reveals liberation from burdensome legalism through mercy. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-16 06:55:32 UTC

Enemies like Tertullian smeared Marcion as a 'docetist' — claiming he taught Jesus only seemed human, with no real body or death.
Reality is that his Evangelion records a genuine stauros (crucifixion), burial, empty tomb, and physical resurrection appearances — even the risen Christ eating fish.
Marcion affirmed the Good Father's real victory over Yahweh's domain of death.

2026-06-16 00:12:33 UTC

Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 11:9)
This promise in the New Testament reveals the open generosity of the wholly Good Father, inviting direct access through Christ apart from Yahweh’s conditional Law and temple system.

2026-06-15 05:18:48 UTC

No one lights a lamp and covers it with a vessel or puts it under a bed, but sets it on a lampstand, so that those who enter may see the light. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 8:16)
This saying in the New Testament underscores the public, revealing nature of the Good Father’s mercy through Christ—nothing hidden remains concealed, calling for open proclamation amid Yahweh’s shadowed world.

2026-06-15 04:24:02 UTC

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): “I will harden Pharaoh’s heart” and brings plagues including death of the firstborn (Exodus 7-12, esp. 11:10).
Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:27-28).
The Elohim of Israel hardens hearts and slays the innocent; the alien Good God reveals enemy-love and mercy without coercion. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-12 02:00:52 UTC

Church fathers like Tertullian & Epiphanius claimed Marcion 'mutilated' Luke & Paul's letters to fit his theology.
The reality was that his Evangelion + Apostolikon preserve an earlier textual tradition. The 'cuts' they accused him of were likely the later orthodox additions that stitched in OT YHWH theology.
Marcion didn't hack the Gospel — he safeguarded the pure Pauline message of grace before it was harmonised with the Law.
Judge the fruit: mercy over merger.

2026-06-11 23:32:18 UTC

No one can serve two masters. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 16:13)
This teaching in the New Testament draws the unbreakable line between loyalty to the Good Father revealed in Christ and entanglement with the Yahweh's material system of mammon, demanding total allegiance to grace.

2026-06-11 23:25:26 UTC

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): “You shall have no other gods before me” and commands exclusive worship with threats of punishment (Exodus 20:3-5).
Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:27-28).
The Elohim of Israel demands jealous exclusivity and vengeance; the alien Good God reveals universal love and mercy even for adversaries. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-11 08:33:46 UTC

🔥🤣 https://image.nostr.build/7a17110f301f81ce6c7ab33614a7b32fcbc844185da04d82599f4976a2f3d16e.jpg

2026-06-11 01:50:09 UTC

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): “I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation” (Exodus 20:5).
Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 23:34).
The Elohim of Israel punishes across generations in jealousy; the alien Good God reveals immediate forgiveness and mercy. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-10 05:43:16 UTC

For there is no good tree that produceth corrupt fruit; nor corrupt tree that produceth good fruit. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:43)
This core saying in the New Testament exposes YHWH's flawed character through his Law’s “bad fruit” (violence, curses, contradictions), contrasting sharply with the wholly good Father God revealed in Christ.

2026-06-10 05:32:33 UTC

Modern Christians freak out at the plain Hebrew of Elohim (plural, a class of divine beings) in the Hebrew Bible, screaming "You don't understand the Bible!" or blaming "bad translations" — all while dodging the actual Hebrew text. The irony is strong.
In the Divine Council worldview (Psalm 82; Deut 32:8-9; Heiser's and Biglino's analysis), Elohim aren't a singular "God" in the later monotheistic sense. Elyon (the Most High) presides over a council of sons of God/Elohim — powerful spiritual beings assigned nations, some rebellious (Watchers, etc.). YHWH is one of them, allotted Israel.
This isn't fringe — it's the ancient Near Eastern context, backed by the text, DSS, and Enochian material. Ignoring it flattens the Bible into modern assumptions and leaves you blind to what's coming: the powers of darkness, delegitimised rulers, and cosmic realignment.
Grasping the Council view unlocks the Bible as it is — and the story still unfolding. It's time to read the Hebrew on its own terms

2026-06-10 04:47:52 UTC

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): Commands the slaughter of the Amalekites, “kill both man and woman, child and infant” (1 Samuel 15:3).
Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:27-28).
The Elohim of Israel demands genocidal violence; the alien Good God reveals perfect love and mercy for all. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-10 03:37:52 UTC

YHWH wasn't a disembodied "spirit" — he was a physical, non-human Elohim.
The Hebrew shows Elohim (incl. YHWH) as flesh-and-blood beings from a group of powerful entities — not omnipotent supernatural God. They walked, ate, smelled sacrifices, flew in vehicles (ruach/kavod), had offspring, and interacted physically with humans.
The Hebrew Bible portrays YHWH with body parts — feet on the ground, hands, etc. — in concrete ANE terms, not abstract spirit.
Later theology spiritualised him.
The text shows otherwise.

2026-06-09 23:58:31 UTC

In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar, when Pilate was governing Judea, Jesus came down to Capharnaum, a city of Galilee. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 3:1)
This abrupt opening of the First New Testament’s Gospel emphasises the sudden intrusion of the Stranger from the Good Father into YHWH’s world—no preparatory prophecies or genealogies, just direct revelation in power.

2026-06-09 23:50:10 UTC

YHWH (the Elohim of Israel): “I form light and create darkness; I make peace and create evil” (Isaiah 45:7).
Jesus (revealing the Good Father): “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly” (John 10:10).
The Elohim of Israel authors evil and death; the alien Good God sends His Son for life and mercy alone. Judge the fruit.

2026-06-08 09:49:55 UTC

One of the biggest differences between the God of the Hebrew Scriptures and the Father Jesus reveals is this:
In the Old Testament, YHWH makes almost no promises about an afterlife. There’s no clear teaching of heaven or hell for the average person. The blessings and curses are almost entirely earthly — land, wealth, long life, or destruction in this world.
Jesus, on the other hand, barely talks about earthly wealth or political power. Instead, He constantly speaks about His Father’s Kingdom and eternal life. The focus of His message is life beyond death — relationship with the Father that continues after this life ends.
It’s a striking shift in emphasis. One is heavily focused on this world. The other is focused on the world to come.

2026-06-08 07:19:21 UTC

Irenaeus (c. 180 CE) was the first to claim there must be exactly four Gospels — and he “proved” it by linking them to the four living creatures in Ezekiel and Revelation (lion, ox, man, eagle).
The connections were absurdly forced. He argued this imagery meant there could be no more and no less than four Gospels. It was a weak, ad hoc argument made to counter Marcion (who used only one Gospel) and other early Christian groups.
This wasn’t ancient consensus — it was later propaganda that helped cement the four-Gospel canon as “obvious” and divinely ordained.

2026-06-07 12:14:13 UTC

In John 8:55, Iēsous tells his opponents: “You have not known [ἐγνώκατε/ginōskō — come to know experientially] him. But I know [οἶδα/oida — full, certain awareness] him.”
This is the climax of a debate over paternity (Jn 8:38–44). They claim God as Father. Iēsous replies: You’ve never known my Father — your god (whom I called “the devil, a liar from the beginning”) isn’t mine.
The Greek verbs drive home the incompatibility.

2026-06-07 06:14:33 UTC

“Marcion thus sees Christians and Jews as fundamentally antithetical, with the results that Jews follow their own tradition, while Christians look to the New Testament with its wholly different ethical framework.”
— Resetting the Origins of Christianity (Dr Markus Vinzent)

2026-06-07 04:22:14 UTC

“O wonder beyond wonders! It is rapture, power, and amazement that one can say nothing at all about the Gospel, or even conceive of it, or compare it with anything!” https://image.nostr.build/ad8437cd16ddaa8ed11137a7bdbd8700de021ebc3c28c72de2aadb4650d1bd69.jpg

2026-06-06 12:40:52 UTC

Jesus taught something radically different from the “eye for an eye” principle found in the Hebrew Scriptures (Exodus 21:24, Leviticus 24:20, Deuteronomy 19:21).
“Turn the other cheek… love your enemies, do good to those who hate you.” (Luke 6:27–29)
In the cultural context of the time, “eye for an eye” was the accepted standard for justice and retaliation. A backhanded slap to the right cheek was often an insult or act of domination rather than a life-threatening attack. Jesus directly challenged that mindset of revenge and personal vengeance. His teaching focused on refusing retaliation, not necessarily banning all forms of self-defence.
Early Christians, including Marcionites, took these commands seriously. Many refused military service and rejected violent retaliation altogether. Marcionite communities were known for their strong stance against returning harm for harm.
This stands in clear contrast to the God of the Hebrew Scriptures, who repeatedly commanded retributive violence and the total destruction of enemies.
Importantly, Jesus’ words were aimed at stopping cycles of retaliation — not at forbidding someone from protecting themselves or their family when under attack.

2026-06-05 07:41:17 UTC

David Trobisch argues that the New Testament as we know it today was deliberately shaped with an anti-Marcionite agenda.
The four Gospels, the Book of Acts, the full collection of Paul’s letters (including Hebrews and the Pastoral Epistles), the Catholic Epistles, and Revelation all reflect a redactional concept designed to counter Marcion’s earlier canon.
In other words, the New Testament wasn’t assembled neutrally. It was edited and finalised, at least in part, as a response to Marcion.

2026-06-05 07:14:04 UTC

Irenaeus (c. 180 CE) is the first Christian writer we know of who actively promoted exactly four Gospels — Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John — as the authoritative ones.
Marcion (c. 140 CE), writing roughly 40 years earlier, already knew of these same four Gospels. However, he rejected them all, claiming they were later corruptions and plagiarisms of his own Evangelion.
According to Tertullian, Marcion was the only person before Irenaeus to even mention all four Gospels by name.
This timeline matters. The idea of a fixed four-Gospel canon wasn’t an early consensus — it was a later development pushed by Irenaeus and those who came after him.

2026-06-05 05:15:32 UTC

For those who are new here, let me be clear — my original followers can attest to this.
I started this account promoting Christian Orthodoxy. Then I discovered Michael Heiser’s Divine Council Worldview, which completely blew my mind. I was posting enthusiastically about the Watchers, Nephilim, and the “blurry” parts of the Bible that mainstream churches are now being forced to confront because of the UFO/UAP conversation.
Later, someone here shared Israel Anderson’s Two Gardens & a Snake, and for the first time I saw that YHWH was the one who lied in the Garden. That connected directly to Jesus saying the devil is a liar and murderer from the beginning. That discovery sent me much deeper down the rabbit hole.
As I began sharing what I was finding, I was quickly labelled a heretic and a Marcionite — even though I had never even heard of Marcion before. That accusation actually led me to research him, which then opened up serious study into early Christianity and the first New Testament.
My journey is fully visible on this account. If you go back through my older posts, you’ll see exactly how I got here.
So when people claim I just have a bias and simply “hate YHWH,” that’s not true. I didn’t start with that conclusion. I followed the evidence — studying how the texts developed, what came first, what was changed, and who changed them.
I’m not trying to pigeonhole anyone, and I’d appreciate the same courtesy. We’re all at different stages in our search for truth. May we all keep seeking it — because Jesus said He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and He told us to knock and seek, and the door will be opened.

2026-06-05 04:35:52 UTC

I've noticed people follow me, comment, and then bail/unfollow after a rebuttal (since I don't instantly agree with them).
I'm not petty, so it doesn't bother me. But I choose to follow those who challenge me and with whom I disagree. Why can't this be the standard?

2026-06-05 04:29:46 UTC

In the Evangelion (cf. Luke 18:9–14), Jesus tells the parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector.
The self-righteous, Law-observant Pharisee goes home unjustified. The ritually impure tax collector simply cries, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner,” and is justified.
This isn’t how the covenant system of the God of Israel worked. It reflects the different principle of the unknown Good Father revealed by Jesus: grace over Law observance.

2026-06-05 02:03:37 UTC

YHWH commands the Levites to slaughter 3,000 of their own people after the Golden Calf incident (Exodus 32:27–28).
In the Gospel, when a Samaritan village rejects Jesus and his disciples, James and John want to call down fire on them. Jesus sharply rebukes them and simply moves on (Evangelion; cf. Luke 9:54–55).
YHWH demands the killing of his own people for idolatry. The Good Father does not retaliate with violence when rejected.https://nostpic.com/media/6159b8e9fa415b71b73b35ae68d011daac2ed3f130b2243648440a9341040d1c/1a85dcdcb226d816ba10fa9221f8e03f7c7f49ab537d791fad9bb160e6789360.webp

2026-06-04 23:20:12 UTC

The “Church Fathers” who trash Marcion weren’t neutral historians — they were later polemicists writing decades (sometimes over a century) after the earliest sources.
Irenaeus, Tertullian, Epiphanius and the rest had their own agendas such as building institutional power, defining orthodoxy, and smearing rivals. Their accounts of Marcion are full of distortion, exaggeration and outright invention.
Many of these same Fathers had serious issues themselves — theological backflips, poor historical accuracy, and in some cases their own later “heresies.”
If you actually want to understand early Christianity, stop treating the victors’ propaganda as reliable history. Go back to the earliest Gospel layer we can reconstruct. The picture looks very different.

2026-06-04 04:49:45 UTC

In the Greek text of the Gospel, Jesus’ name is Iēsous — not Yeshua, and certainly not YHWH.
The attached image from Strong’s Concordance (entry 3442) shows that the name Yeshua simply means “he will save.” It does not contain or mean “Yahweh saves.”
Some people point to the longer Old Testament name Yehoshua (Joshua), which does mean “Yahweh saves.” However, by the time of Jesus, the name had been shortened to Yeshua. The divine name element had already dropped out. The Greek Gospels reflect this later, shortened form — not the older Yehoshua.
This matters because Jesus did not come to serve or represent YHWH. He came to reveal a previously unknown Good Father whose character stands in direct opposition to the jealous, wrathful, and violent God of the Hebrew Scriptures.
As Jesus taught: judge the tree by its fruit.
YHWH’s fruit is wrath, jealousy, and death.
The Father Jesus reveals produces mercy, healing, and life.
The name doesn’t override the fruit.https://nostpic.com/media/6159b8e9fa415b71b73b35ae68d011daac2ed3f130b2243648440a9341040d1c/18b6ab2aaa41663a71091c6c99df1d54240637c0987d421f2f096f4e2416da50.webp

2026-06-04 02:36:20 UTC

A lot of Christians struggle with the plain meaning of the Hebrew text.
It doesn’t present YHWH as the abstract, all-loving, all-powerful “omni-God” of later theology. It presents him as one powerful member of the Elohim — a category of non-human beings — whose actions often include extreme wrath, jealousy, revenge, and regret.
At the same time, many non-Christians dismiss Jesus as “Jewish controlled opposition.”
But the first NT tells a different story. Jesus did not come to affirm or serve the god of Israel. He came to reveal a previously unknown Good Father — one whose character and ways stand in direct contrast to YHWH.
Attacks are coming from both sides of the aisle.
The earliest Gospel refuses to fit either narrative.

2026-06-04 01:28:55 UTC

YHWH sent an evil spirit to torment Saul:
“Now the Spirit of YHWH departed from Saul, and a harmful spirit from YHWH tormented him.” (1 Samuel 16:14)
In the Gospel, when Jesus encounters a man tormented by many unclean spirits, He commands the spirits to leave — and the man is restored to his right mind (Evangelion, cf. Luke 8:29, 35).
YHWH afflicts people with evil spirits.
The Good Father sets them free.https://nostpic.com/media/6159b8e9fa415b71b73b35ae68d011daac2ed3f130b2243648440a9341040d1c/9f875fb350d6cbe90dbfe3ee3ca60cb785ef118ed2ca79fe1ed3d516bfcb64b6.webp

2026-06-04 00:30:02 UTC

YHWH’s Law declares a woman with an ongoing issue of blood to be unclean. Anyone who touches her also becomes unclean (Leviticus 15:19–27).
In the Gospel, a woman who had been bleeding for twelve years touches Jesus. Instead of making Him unclean, she is instantly healed (Evangelion, cf. Luke 8:43–48).
YHWH’s system contaminates and excludes.
The Good Father’s power heals and restores.

2026-06-03 06:32:56 UTC

Why “Elohim” should never be translated as “God”:
In the original Hebrew, Elohim is not a name or a title meaning “God.”
It is a plural category — a class of powerful non-human beings (like “Anunnaki” in Sumerian texts).
YHWH is one specific member of that group. That’s why the text can say “other elohim,” why YHWH is jealous of them, and why Elyon assigns nations to different elohim (Deut 32:8-9).
Translating it as “God” erases the plural reality and forces later monotheism onto the text.
Leave it as Elohim.

2026-06-03 06:08:47 UTC

YHWH commands total destruction of the Canaanites:
“You shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall devote them to complete destruction…” (Deuteronomy 20:16–17)
In the Gospel, Jesus tells the parable of the Good Samaritan — a despised foreigner — and concludes:
“Go and do likewise.” (Evangelion G 10:37; cf. Luke 10:37)
YHWH demands the complete annihilation of outsiders. The Good Father teaches radical mercy, even toward those considered enemies.
Two completely different spirits.
Two completely different gods.

2026-06-03 05:28:43 UTC

Give, and it will be given to you. Good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will be put into your lap. For with the measure you use it will be measured back to you. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:38)
In the Father’s kingdom, the way we treat others — with mercy, generosity, and non-judgment — determines how we ourselves are treated. This is not the Law’s retributive justice, but a new measure of grace.

2026-06-03 02:29:16 UTC

Another misused “prophecies” about Jesus is Daniel 7:13–14.
In Daniel, the figure comes to the Ancient of Days and the kingdom is given to the saints as a collective (vv. 18, 22, 27). There is no individual descending Messiah.
In the Gospel, Jesus announces the opposite: the Human One coming down from heaven with power and great glory (Evangelion, cf. Lk 21:27). The direction is reversed.
By the late 3rd century, orthodox writers were already forcing the two together. Adamantius claimed:
"This is similar to what Daniel says: ‘I saw One like a son of man coming on the clouds.’ And in the Gospel it says, ‘As lightning comes out of the east… so shall also the coming of the Son of Man be’."
The Marcionite Megethius pushed back with Daniel 2: the stone has not yet smashed the kingdoms of the earth, proving the Christ of the Law and the Prophets has not yet arrived. He added that John the Baptist — a prophet of the Creator God (YHWH) — did not recognise Jesus:
"Now when he had heard in prison the works of Christ, he sent his disciples to Him, saying, ‘Are You He who is to come, or look we for another?’"

2026-06-02 04:13:56 UTC

And Jesus rebuked him, saying, “Be silent and come out of him!” And when the demon had thrown him down in the midst, he came out of him, having done him no harm. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 4:35)
Unclean spirits must obey the son of the Most High.

2026-06-01 23:46:39 UTC

Fact: Marcion’s Apostolikon contains only 10 of Paul’s letters and lacks the Pastoral Epistles (1 & 2 Timothy, Titus) entirely.
Scientific evidence from stylometric and lexical analysis shows these Pastorals have significantly different vocabulary and theology, consistent with 2nd-century anti-Marcionite redaction to strengthen links to YHWH’s established church structure. Marcion’s collection reflects the earlier circulating letters.

2026-06-01 02:15:51 UTC

Fact: Marcion’s Evangelion has no infancy narrative, unlike canonical Luke.
Scientific evidence from textual criticism shows Luke 1-2 was added later as an anti-Marcionite expansion to link Jesus directly to YHWH. Computational analysis of vocabulary and style confirms these chapters as secondary redaction. Marcion’s version came first.

2026-06-01 01:47:51 UTC

And amazement seized them all, and they glorified God and were filled with awe, saying, “We have seen extraordinary things today.” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 5:26)
Jesus is awesome—literally.

2026-05-29 05:46:41 UTC

And they were all amazed and said to one another, “What is this word? For with authority and power he commands the unclean spirits, and they come out!” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 4:36)
Jesus wielded absolute authority over darkness. No rituals. No struggle. Just raw, sovereign power.

2026-05-26 23:07:02 UTC

It always saddens me when Christians behave and speak as YHWH rather than Jesus or the Father He revealed.
Mercy, grace, and love > wrath, curses, and condemnation.

2026-05-25 11:17:14 UTC

It’s actually ridiculous that Marcion was branded a “heretic” and even the “arch-heretic” — yet in the mid-2nd century there was no orthodoxy.
No unified church. No fixed New Testament. No agreed-upon creed.
Christianity was a chaotic mix of competing groups. Marcion simply organised the first actual Christian canon: the Evangelion and the Apostolikon.
Calling him a heretic is nothing more than the later winners writing history and slapping a label on the man whose clear, coherent vision they eventually had to fight against and rewrite.
He wasn’t a heretic.
He was one of the earliest and most influential Christian theologians — before “orthodoxy” even existed.

2026-05-25 07:15:27 UTC

Here's a Marcionite music playlist celebrating the unknown Good Father and the mercy revealed by Iēsous.
Enjoy the songs of true freedom.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgaTniRI4-nhmC_kOlCWAChPNo3XYIbFB&si=29QFOutEYrFQnoyp

2026-05-25 06:13:33 UTC

In the original Hebrew OT, ruach (usually translated “spirit”) often literally means a physical transport device — a flying vehicle of the Elohim.
It lifts prophets like Ezekiel and Elijah, makes noise, arrives from specific directions, and carries people through the air.
(Note: Not every use is a vehicle — context tells you when it’s the concrete machine vs. wind/breath.)

2026-05-25 05:58:07 UTC

When you truly understand that the Father Jesus revealed is not YHWH, but the unknown, wholly Good God, real freedom begins.
You are no longer chained to the creator’s Law, fear, guilt, or wrath.
You are liberated into the pure mercy, grace, and love of the Father who was hidden until Jesus made Him known.
This is the freedom of the Gospel: no longer slaves to the old system, but beloved children of the Good Father.

2026-05-25 04:09:59 UTC

In the Ancient Near East, YHWH wasn’t the abstract, all-loving “God” of later theology.
The original Hebrew Bible presents him as a very physical, wrathful Elohim — one of a group of powerful beings who commands, fights, gets jealous, and walks among humans. He sits on a massive throne, descends in smoke and fire, and deploys hybrid monsters (seraphim = burning flying serpents) as his hitmen.
YHWH literally sends seraphim-snakes to massacre his own people in the desert for complaining (Numbers 21), then offers a bronze serpent for “protection”… if they kiss the ring.
This is not metaphor. The ANE saw YHWH as a real, territorial commander with a monstrous entourage — angry, physical, and extremely dangerous when disobeyed.
The “pretend it’s true” reading hits different.

2026-05-25 00:36:20 UTC

Another one of the most misused “prophecies” about Jesus is Micah 5:2 (“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small… out of you will come a ruler over Israel”).
The reality is, in context, this is about a Davidic military leader who would arise during the Assyrian crisis to deliver Israel, defeat their enemies, and bring peace and security to the land (Micah 5:4-6).
Jesus never fulfilled this. He brought no national deliverance, no victory over Israel’s oppressors, and no peace.
The “from ancient days” phrase simply refers to the Davidic dynasty, not literal pre-existence.
Plain Hebrew context > Christian eisegesis.

2026-05-25 00:28:15 UTC

YHWH declares the Law and the Prophets to be permanent and unbreakable:
“You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it…” (Deuteronomy 4:2)
In the original Evangelion (the first NT), Jesus declares the opposite:
“The Law and the Prophets were until John. Since then the good news of the kingdom of God is preached, and everyone is pressing into it. But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of my words to fail.” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 16:16)
Note the difference: The later canonical Luke changes the ending to “than for one stroke of the Law to fail” — creating an obvious contradiction with the previous verse.
The first Gospel is consistent: the old system had a clear end date. The canonical version was edited to blur that break and force continuity with YHWH’s Law.
The Good Father brought something radically new.

2026-05-23 06:17:38 UTC

Jesus warns of the unforgivable sin:
“Whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven.” (Luke 12:10)
This warning occurs right after the scribes and Pharisees accuse Jesus of casting out demons by the power of Beelzebul, the “prince of demons.” In other words, they are deliberately attributing the miraculous works of the Good Father — the healings, deliverances, and signs of the kingdom — to Satan.
The warning is especially serious because, in the Gospel, the “god of this world” (YHWH) is revealed as the adversarial power that rules the present age. Jesus came precisely to deliver humanity from this god’s domain. To call the clear works of the gracious Father “demonic” or “of Satan” is to blaspheme the Holy Spirit — and that sin, Jesus says, will not be forgiven.
This sharp distinction between the Good Father and the god of this world runs throughout the original Gospel. The unforgivable sin is not a vague spiritual offense — it is the refusal to recognize the Father’s mercy when it stands directly in front of you.

2026-05-22 06:44:31 UTC

Jesus, in the first NT, gives this beautiful promise of the Good Father:
“So I tell you: Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and the door will be opened to you. Is there any father among you who, if his son asks for a fish, would give him a snake instead?”
(Evangelion, cf. Luke 11:9, 11)
Yet the God of Israel did exactly that.
When the Israelites cried out for meat and remembered the fish they ate in Egypt, they complained against Yahweh. In response, he sent poisonous snakes among them, and many died (Numbers 11:4–5; 21:5–6).
Israel was repeatedly called Yahweh’s “son.”
So when Jesus contrasts the loving Father who gives good gifts with a father who would give serpents instead of fish, he is clearly distinguishing the Good Father from Yahweh, the God of Israel.

2026-05-22 06:37:26 UTC

What Jesus taught us about the Father’s Kingdom and how we are to live is clear and sufficient in the first NT.
He proclaimed the good news of the kingdom of God (Luke 4:43), sent His disciples to announce it (Luke 9:2), and declared that the kingdom had come upon people through His works (Luke 11:20). He taught that the kingdom does not come with visible signs or spectacle, but is already within you (Luke 17:20–21). It grows quietly like a mustard seed (Luke 13:18–19) and works silently like leaven (Luke 13:20–21).
Rather than worrying about the future, Jesus gave this direct command:
“Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat, or about your body, what you will wear.” (Luke 12:22)
He pointed to the Father’s care for the birds and the lilies, and urged us instead to seek His kingdom — trusting that all our material needs will be provided (Luke 12:24–31).
Above all, Jesus commanded us to live in radical love and mercy:
“Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, and pray for those who mistreat you.” (Luke 6:27–28)
He summarised it with the Golden Rule:
“Do to others as you would have them do to you.” (Luke 6:31)
And He set the highest standard:
“Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.” (Luke 6:36)
This is the simple, yet powerful, way of life Jesus revealed in the first NT — focus on the Father’s kingdom, trust instead of anxiety, and unconditional love and mercy toward all.

2026-05-22 05:55:24 UTC

The Judaizers would have you believe the Law is eternal.
But in the first NT (Marcion’s Evangelion), Jesus says:
“The Law and the Prophets were until John. Since then the good news of the kingdom of God is preached, and everyone is pressing into it. But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of my words to fail.”
— Luke 16:16–17 (The Very First Bible p. 45 / Testamentum p. 89 / True Testament p. 54)
Compare that to the later canonical version, which changes the ending to:
“…than for one dot of the Law to become void.”
Jason BeDuhn points out the obvious contradiction: if the Law ended with John (v. 16), how can Jesus immediately say not one stroke of the Law will pass away (v. 17)?
The first NT makes perfect sense. The later “Judaized” version creates an internal contradiction.

2026-05-22 04:00:07 UTC

Another one of the most misused “prophecies” about Jesus is Isaiah 53 (“Suffering Servant”).
Isaiah 53 is not about Jesus. In context (Isaiah 41–53), the “Suffering Servant” is explicitly Israel (see Isa 41:8, 44:1, 49:3, 49:5–6). The chapter describes Israel’s national suffering in exile, the nations’ later shock at Israel’s restoration, and Israel’s vindication — a collective suffering-and-redemption motif, not an individual dying Messiah who atones for the world’s sins.
The Christian reading is classic eisegesis that ignores the clear identification in the Hebrew text itself.

2026-05-22 03:41:59 UTC

One of the most misused “prophecies” about Jesus is Isaiah 7:14 (“Behold, a virgin shall conceive”).
However, the Hebrew says “almah” (young woman), not virgin. It was a short-term sign to King Ahaz in 735 BCE — before the child was even a few years old, the two enemy kings would be gone.
Completely fulfilled in Isaiah’s time.
It's not about Jesus 700 years later.

2026-05-22 03:33:42 UTC

“For no good tree bears bad fruit, nor again does a bad tree bear good fruit, for each tree is known by its own fruit. For figs are not gathered from thornbushes, nor are grapes picked from a bramble bush. The good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks.” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:43–45)
Our words and actions reveal the true condition of our heart. May we cultivate a good heart that naturally bears the good fruit of the kingdom.

2026-05-22 00:07:21 UTC

YHWH’s prophet Elijah calls down fire from heaven to consume two captains and their companies of soldiers (2 Kings 1:9–12).
In the Evangelion, when James and John want to call down fire on a Samaritan village that rejected them, Christ sharply rebukes them: “You do not know what spirit you are of” (Evangelion G 9:55; cf. Luke 9:55).
YHWH destroys with fire.
The Father forbids even the desire for destructive violence.

2026-05-21 23:24:44 UTC

Why am I labeled a “hater of Jews” for simply noting that YHWH’s floods, plagues, jealousy and conquests in the OT clash with Jesus’ merciful Father who teaches “love your enemies”?
I critique only the character of YHWH — never Jews as a people.
Yet I’m never called a hater of Christians or Jesus.
The instant jump to “antisemite” is telling: even the accusers treat YHWH as the God of Israel, not Jesus’ Father.

2026-05-21 02:11:31 UTC

I’ve got huge respect for Mike Wingerii and his ongoing efforts to expose corruption and cover-up culture in the Church, and for holding people’s feet to the fire.
We may disagree on the identity of YHWH, but the work he’s doing matters. Light really is the best disinfectant.

2026-05-20 23:21:03 UTC

I believe the recent surge in attacks on the concept of “other gods [Elohim]” in the Divine Council is designed to stop people realising that YHWH is not the only Elohim. This opens the door to the understanding that the Father of Jesus is not YHWH.
As Jesus taught, simply judge the fruit. Compare the character, actions, and words of YHWH with those of Jesus and His Father.
Without acknowledging other Elohim, you’re left having to defend the jealous, narcissistic, and wrathful behaviour of YHWH simply because “he has to be Jesus’ Father—he’s the only God!” #nevent1q…m9d7

2026-05-20 06:18:02 UTC

This is the “god” who curses His people with cannibalism in siege and starves mothers into devouring their babies.
"See, Yahweh, and take note! With whom have you dealt thus? Should women eat their young children of tender care? Should priest and prophet be slain in the sanctuary of the Lord?" (Lam 2:20)
The Father of Jesus never does such horrors.
Two different gods.

2026-05-20 06:11:14 UTC

This is the true face of YHWH: jealous, wrathful, destroyer of His own children.
"You have summoned my horror from all around, as if for a feast day; no one on the day of Yahweh’s anger is a fugitive and a survivor; whoever I have cared for and reared, my enemy has destroyed." (Lam 2:22)
The Father of Jesus is not this god.

2026-05-19 21:44:38 UTC

Christians are losing their minds over the meaning of Elohim as God/gods—why is this happening all of a sudden en masse?
The word should never have been translated and just left alone.

2026-05-19 02:03:01 UTC

I find it incredibly curious (and telling) that a demon was hanging out among YHWH's temple.
In the synagogue there was a man possessed by a demon, and he suddenly shouted out in a loud voice, “What do you want with us, Jesus? Did you come here to destroy us? I know who you are — the holy one of God!” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 4:33–34)

2026-05-19 00:06:40 UTC

My mother and my brothers are those who hear the word of God and do it. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 8:21)
- JESUS

2026-05-12 05:20:34 UTC

If you believe the phenomenon of aliens (UFOs, Greys, Reptilians, Insectilians) are all demons, what's your logical reasoning and evidence for this conclusion?

2026-05-07 06:52:13 UTC

- reply

Your family, friends, co-workers, the stranger that you encounter - do they know about the good news of His Kingdom?

2026-05-07 05:46:28 UTC

And when it was day, he departed and went into a desolate place. And the people sought him and came to him, and would have kept him from leaving them, but he said to them, “I must preach the good news of the kingdom of God to the other towns as well; for I was sent for this purpose.” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 4:42–43)
Go forth boldly with the same urgent mission—proclaim the kingdom wherever the Father sends you, for this is why Christ came.

2026-05-06 05:36:36 UTC

Everyone knew YHWH — the loud, jealous, wrathful deity who would smite people with fire in a moment’s notice. No one knew Jesus’ Father until He revealed Him.
“He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.” (Col 1:15)
“All things have been handed over to me by my Father; and no one knows who the Son is except the Father, or who the Father is except the Son and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.” (Lk 10:22)
Jesus is the antithesis of YHWH.

2026-05-06 01:32:00 UTC

“Lord, if you will, you can make me clean.” And Jesus stretched out his hand and touched him, saying, “I will; be clean.” And immediately the leprosy left him. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 5:12–13)
Come to Jesus with the leper’s humble faith—He is both willing and able.

2026-05-05 05:34:06 UTC

“Daughter, your faith has rescued you.” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 8:48)
Your faith alone is enough — come to Christ just as you are, and the Good Father’s mercy will make you whole.

2026-05-02 11:46:34 UTC

Jesus in John 8:54-55:
“My Father glorifies Me — the one you claim is your God. But you have not known Him. I know Him.”
Translation:
You say: “I work for the CEO.” Jesus: “I work for the real CEO. You claim He’s your boss, but you’ve never met Him. You don’t know who He is.”
The Jews knew YHWH perfectly — the loud, wrathful God of the Hebrew Bible. Sinai, the Law, the Temple. Everyone knew Him.
But Jesus’ Father? Totally unknown until the Son revealed Him.
One God = known by all. The other God = known only by Jesus.
The Jews thought they served the Most High. Jesus says: You’ve been serving the wrong one. My Father — the true good God — was hidden from the world until I came.
Two Gods; One public. One secret.
That’s the Gospel.

2026-05-01 03:34:45 UTC

In the original Greek of the entire New Testament, the instrument Jesus died on is called stauros — literally an upright stake/pole. English Bibles translate it “cross” for traditional reasons, but the Greek word itself points to a stake.

2026-05-01 02:30:25 UTC

And Jesus said to Simon, “Do not be afraid; from now on you will be catching men.” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 5:10)
Leave your nets behind and follow Him—Jesus calls ordinary people to become fishers of men, drawing souls into the kingdom with the same power that filled their boats.

2026-04-30 01:51:09 UTC

And he said to them, “...Which is easier, to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven you,’ or to say, ‘Rise and walk’? But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins”—he said to the man who was paralysed—“I say to you, rise, take up your bed and go home.” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 5:22–24)
The Son of Man’s authority to forgive sins is the same authority that heals bodies and restores lives—receive it today with faith.

2026-04-28 04:09:14 UTC

Jesus, restorer from the Torah.

2026-04-28 03:14:18 UTC

In the very first Gospel (Evangelion, cf. Luke 16:19–31), Jesus tells the parable of the Rich Man & Lazarus: The rich man lives lavishly under YHWH’s law — and wakes in torment. The beggar Lazarus is carried by angels into the Father’s comfort.
A great fixed chasm lies between them forever.
Jesus warns that even someone rising from the dead won’t convince those still chained to the old Law.
Two gods. Two destinies.

2026-04-17 05:43:35 UTC

Orthodox Bro,
You know not what spirit you are of.
Led by the Spirit? Then you are not under the Law (Gal 5:18) — you are a son of God (Rom 8:14).
Follow Jesus who sent the Spirit. Reject YHWH.

2026-04-17 00:19:39 UTC

“Fear not, little flock, for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom.” (Evangelion, cf. Luke 12:32)

2026-04-15 07:59:14 UTC

Prayer is not a laundry list of requests, but a permanent state of contemplation.