JayByte

Ok. I wouldn't even reply to the idea of rating system if this idea wasn't potentially disruptive to Nostr protocol. I love Nostr and I don't want to implement it. That's all.

2026-03-23 11:07:48 UTC

- reply

> Did I ask you?
https://image.nostr.build/acb33072e843ec4b298f5168c5d9fad3d928cecaebe7467330f122422f57a334.png
Just to recall

2026-03-23 11:04:15 UTC

- reply

Asks a man who couldn't tell me what he reads haha

2026-03-23 08:40:52 UTC

- reply

You understand consequences of ongoing multicrisis?

2026-03-23 08:19:19 UTC

- reply

There are already "magic" tools, which can help you with motivation at basic level, implement what you want etc. Why did you ask me to implement the idea in the first place?

2026-03-23 07:28:44 UTC

- reply

*the five requirements

2026-03-23 07:26:04 UTC

Nostr protocol already implements the four requirements. Your idea of rating system incentives soft silos, which violates purpose of Nostr (and RSS feeds). You're not helping.
#nevent1q…ywds

2026-03-21 08:23:05 UTC

Happy Nowruz! 💮️🌞️

2026-03-19 18:11:20 UTC

Micro-cultures are also good justification of material abundance. Otherwise society as a system experiences an analog of the second law of thermodynamics, but at higher levels: if material goods are too abundant to a point when they can't provide fittest substrate to higher levels (culture, creativity etc.), these are likely cases (and they often appear as sequential steps historically):
1. Degeneration of individualism and culture. Culture develops simplified fraction for better engagement, but fresh individuals do not realize purpose behind this simplification, these define their entire lifestyle on this culture, they live their entire life as constant "now", they lose motivation in learning and crafting. This leads to fragile cultural landscape.
2. Inadequate wealth and societal inequality (which does not fit real differences in age, experience and intelligence as Pareto optimum). Essential symptom of the previous step as people lose highest "why?" (for exploration of unknown landscape and/or helping others), their lack of highest motivation is compensated by endless competition to "look better than others".
3. Rugged feudalism, brittle civilization. Symptom of the previous step, as an essential exit from "dead horse" system.
So I live my life at my own pace and I learn new stuff which does not end in p2p services and tools, and is rooted in individualism (p2p is a set of solutions to the fragility of cyberpunk circus, not what could keep at least myself living for long time).
#nevent1q…t6fy

2026-03-19 17:36:32 UTC

- reply

Thus, what took entire generations in past to learn, nowadays can be compactified in single individual (and even technology to some extent).

2026-03-19 17:17:30 UTC

entropy is a bitch. if you don't adapt to it adequately at all known levels, you lose life.

2026-03-19 17:02:49 UTC

To continue.
"why you don't just pick up traditional and established culture and religion?"
Because traditional cultures in their full sense are not good fit for me. Plus they're easily prone to desecration, if not kept in trusted circles (as history has shown many times, which finally rationalized it as "postmodern" meta-meme). I have history of adaptation to them and lost a lot of time and energy, figuring out hidden cues and how I can act with them naturally/in flow state. Especially cultures, which strictly prohibit some essential but positive features of life. This is also why I sometimes fell for left things like auxiliary languages like Esperanto, universal human morale. Because if you have simple contract rules, then you can easily communicate with people of diverse cultures. However, if you don't create art and build micro-culture, you just adapt to this simplified meta-culture, and thus lose sense of yourself, making yourself prone to provocations. It's like the problem of "high cohesion & low coupling vs high coupling vs low cohesion (occurring at different scales)". That's why I love ethos of pantheism.
#nevent1q…zswq

2026-03-19 16:26:58 UTC

Still I'm offline most of the week because I learn new stuff and walk in nature, but I want to acknowledge. I am realizing why autistic person needs her/his own micro-culture even if she/he has their own customs. Without your own culture, your customs are just a bunch of prepared "recipes" or patterns which do not systemically answer root "why?", "what is the purpose of that beyond immediate/utilitarian survival (this could happen infinite many times >_<)?", "how to revive interest in life and hobbies in complex crises?". That's why I've revived my interest in constructed languages again. And I found an interesting tool for building conlangs which aggregates words into groups, builds grammar, generates new words with patterns, has quizzes for learnable feedback: https://github.com/DraqueT/PolyGlot . You can download working version for Linux there: https://draquet.github.io/PolyGlot/
#asd #conlang #linux #opensource

2026-03-13 19:01:14 UTC

- reply

How about self-hosted forums, small imageboards, non big-tech online multiplayer games, collaborative games (SMBX, Phyard, "Everybody edits" came into my mind)? Big tech/government social media is like a short dream for me tbh

2026-03-08 07:44:44 UTC

What is more accurate term than "ratmen" to people, who are willing even to nuke entire world just to keep you in poverty and misery forever with respect to their antique barbarian worldview?

2026-03-04 10:21:35 UTC

- reply

> I think I'm a bit lost in abstractions already, could you elaborate please?
It's the idea that entropy is basic layer of reality (then space, then physical energy and matter). This is what current AGI can produce without much human work. Higher layers of reality currently require way more human intervention, thus meme of "physical proof of human" which asserts that human can be verified via at least physical attributes. Particularly, the meme of "intellectual labor is replaceable by AI" probably stems from the "physical proof oh human" meme. KYC circus is also particular case of the "physical proof" meme.
I'm currently interested in more systematic approach for life than implementing a decentralized system for proving humans/rejecting abusers. This is solution for current KYC circus and AI bloat, it does not resolve the problem of how individualism and voluntary/fun society can be sustained long-termly, how creativity can be emerged as the next level of reality (not like in relative abundance of 2000s-2010s in which too much material abundance without progress in higher levels led to higher-order erosion of culture, morale, then as usual followed by economic collapse, wars and cabal).

2026-03-03 15:55:46 UTC

#naddr1qv…z3lj

2026-03-03 15:35:40 UTC

- reply

There's not only KYC circus. The "intellectual labor is replaceable by (linear regressive, hardware bloated) AI" circus also fits into a narrative, which requires "physical proof of human" as emergent property a top of geometric and entropy layers which anecdotally correspond to what current AI can replace humans in.

2026-02-28 16:43:12 UTC

The irony of "physical proof of human" suggests that 😹️
#nevent1q…20ff

2026-02-28 16:26:54 UTC

- reply

I'm interested in that too. Because even at biological level AI maths do not catch up with all its complexity.

2026-02-28 16:24:22 UTC

#nevent1q…vfaw

2026-02-24 11:14:13 UTC

https://image.nostr.build/b1f7b93717ba4cc6796e00805ef2507f8419275ad99c3547802eb6f2638851ea.jpg

2026-02-21 12:52:38 UTC

#nevent1q…z8xf

2026-02-21 12:37:05 UTC

- reply

Just collapse to simpler, more manageable and adaptive parts of the Internet.

2026-02-21 12:34:05 UTC

- reply

Not actually. Otherwise there would be no meaning in building all that infrastructure.

2026-02-21 11:04:46 UTC

I has been so tired recently that I could not even manage my own Nostr relays on regular basis 😭️
Still, I am alive. I am not surprised by any crisis. Many people from upper levels of hierarchy don't have any clue how to do business, not even what is purpose of it. They keep propagandizing more AI while lacking proper integration of it, because they are stuck into "optimize one variable every time at any costs, only one layer matters" paradigm. When entropic base is inflated relatively to higher levels of reality, it just leads to fracture of system into simpler conscious entities which adapt independently in more possibility space (this is what's meta of decentralization epoch, I think). Some of them recombinate into higher conscious entities, some continue collapse, some remain the same. So I keep going with my life as I see it, as I want it.

2026-02-16 07:17:12 UTC

- reply

Mostly early Internet, videos about maths on YouTube. If you couldn't understand foreign language at least shallowly back then, you would miss many good niches like Everybody Edits, Flash games which had programming capabilities in their level editors. You would just be stuck in autistic circle of old TV nostalgia, repeated PS1 games, tweaking cell phone, crappy PHP/HTML/JS tutorials and local pseudo-scientific meta-memes.

2026-02-13 07:43:09 UTC

- reply

Get well soon!

2026-02-12 14:01:49 UTC

- reply

Thank you for clarification very much! I probably understood the SD very shallowly while was reading other things in parallel.
> It's possible, it's the way it is. The development is described as non-linear: we don't discretely jump to the next levels; multiple of them keep maturing in parallel. They are constrained by distinct phases though: full maturing of level is possible when previous levels also have finished this cycle (up to the exiting phase).
Yep. Potential of higher level is constrained by potential of lower level. This is seen in variety of things: from complexity of hardware and software technologies to societal organizations. For the former, it's interesting that you could still have photo-realistic graphics on Amigas, but this was limited to photos, some specifically optimized demos and scene, static elements of games because of color calculation complexity and very few MHz CPU with very few KBs of RAM. Why we need higher level? Probably that's related to downward causality in which higher levels of complexity manage entropy at lower levels, to keep it from disintegration by interaction with chaotic environment, thus making meaning of existence of certain level of reality (the second law of thermodynamics is compatible with disintegration at physical level, r/K selection pressure at biological level which limits long-term/big scale adaptation). Disintegration manifests itself, for example, in monolithic legacy software, when adding new features risks stability of system (especially in hustle working environments). Collapse phase of development probably occurs at critical point of disintegration, when higher level of complexity attempts to scale in entropy more than lower levels of complexity (simplest form of environment push/pull?).
> If you're curious it's defined in some detail for each level for instance in "Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership and Change" (1996, Don Beck, Christopher Cowan); see "Exiting Phase" for each level/value system/vMEME.
I see. I've read these points, good for introduction though I expected more formal explanation on these. I've been already familiar with non-linear dynamics of world development which combines long-term entropy increase with complexity of the world and growth, acceleration, stagnation, degradation and collapse phases which were inspired by cellular automatons and relativistic personal development. That's why I found SD interesting to look at.
> Most likely I'm hallucinating. Do you mean that SD attempts to describe anything in relation to cognitive development?
No. I attempted to apply SD for different entities of intelligent life. But lower development of operational, than mental, than worldview still aligns with the hierarchy of potentials in SD, if operational model has more possibilities, than mental model which has more possibilities, than worldview model. The latter is very specific, while the former are broader. In times of crises, the worldview model tries to increase in possibilities because it's easiest option at these moments, then creating downward pressure.

2026-02-08 15:26:19 UTC

I love Nostr for its slower pace of communication, which is already set when you should sign events before sending them. Even a bit slower than in old forums with their lack of true real-time notifications
#nostr #slowlife

2026-02-08 12:08:44 UTC

- reply

Same. I used to write my own p2p network protocol based on JSON before I discovered Nostr. It never went into production though but was fun experience 😸
(many such things in life history tbh, only few things do actual stuff)

2026-02-08 09:27:11 UTC

Spiral dynamics seems another Maslow's pyramid for neurotypical individuals, but covered into evolutionism. I think, main problems with it are:
1. What is "definition of done" for each level of complexity until it can leverage to new level of complexity? What if previous "levels" is developed for more after new level reaches its local maxima? For example, "cultural" level can evolve while lacking sufficient medication (for example, individual rituals and languages), autism does not totally block from integration into society. Thus properties from very different levels of complexity may be integrated at different stages of life.
2. Worldview complexity is not cognitive and functional complexities. The former may be ahead of the latter and vice versa. In beginning of 2010s I had deterministic worldview while most of knowledge and tools were experiential leveraged by magical thinking, not even complex logic was involved.
Since these unresolved problems of any hierarchical foundation I've come to Platonism-like foundation for worldview with different abstract "elements".

2026-02-07 19:37:55 UTC

- reply

Cried when I remembered lullaby from my childhood which was sung by male singer back in 2000s

2026-02-07 19:17:11 UTC

Cried at night for the first time in 20 years

2026-02-07 18:58:00 UTC

https://image.nostr.build/2e61e0afd6aa466bd58d6cc60aff2eb46b711219220ac8575c80616c1d4d5ebe.png

2026-02-07 18:57:07 UTC

https://image.nostr.build/e9da0605291dc960a9cbdeab0d3b0e3994c6deefdc7d884226b9fdbaaa2626a9.png

2026-02-01 14:07:13 UTC

- reply

Ciphers and constructed languages are even longer story

2026-02-01 14:02:40 UTC

That's how the New Renaissance starts from early Y2K Medieval with fading "cyberpunk". For me decentralization is a whole mindset. There are also nanoboards, stg, over-exploitation of hyper-centralized resources if you should use them for some purpose (like work), async remote work culture. What started as simple independent life individualism, it then evolves in more complex/progressive way. This does not happen suddenly one day though, this is long-term continuous trend. And it's not always about one real variable.
#nevent1q…994u

2026-01-28 08:20:59 UTC

- reply

Chess, macau, free solitaire

2026-01-27 11:22:14 UTC

- reply

"But we need to move faster because we may lose opportunities and in general entropy is always increasing". Nah. This is so abstract and too much generalizing, this disregards critical aspects of work and of people who mostly align with it. Good epistemic of software engineering lays in either reducing routine friction, or creating new media products. Both ways are heavily creative and analytical work. If businesses evolve in terms of months and years, it doesn't mean you don't need any planning and vision. If you don't have it, you simply do low-operational work. Entropy increase argument is rofl for me since I have been doing CS beyond mainstream SWE work.
"But we need to ensure that employees do actual work, not slack off it". Create safe and enjoyable environments, hire smart people (the higher position is, the more intelligent employee is expected to be), reduce friction. -> "but we need to maintain healthy state of team". Constant pressure doesn't do that, contrary. But there are sometimes limits in extension and development of system ofc.

2026-01-27 10:44:00 UTC

If intellectual work is done properly, it won't require much synchronization. Coding and designing, for example, is almost done in solo productively. Pair programming is rarely needed (especially in AI age).
#nevent1q…547k

2026-01-27 10:30:53 UTC

The previous and the current year are opportunities for async remote work.

2026-01-24 11:18:30 UTC

- reply

I rather see small changes as a mindset, not literal way of living

2026-01-24 11:10:20 UTC

- reply

Small changes is certainly a thing of slow life. Making meaning from small change may be harder (at least initially) than making meaning from small thing, but it's good step in life from painful transitions between passive learning and abrupt change of way of life. Like past major changes, this could require more advanced technology and goods besides just mindset shift.

2026-01-24 10:32:37 UTC

"masters of Universe" who never have contributed to advancement in quality of life and freedoms as entropy is always increasing lol

2026-01-24 10:23:16 UTC

- reply

To me it's matter if it's choice of own will or coercion. Filtering and speech can occur both in both ways. Sometimes processing signals from significantly huge amount of sources is practically impossible, so you still follow only those who match your vibe to certain degree.

2026-01-20 07:24:11 UTC

- reply

not sustainable as a thing for long-term self-sovereign living

2026-01-20 07:22:51 UTC

- reply

💯
This narrative reminds me of past dreams of "living long-term self-sovereign life with only Victorian era technologies". If I was smarter back then, I would quickly figure out why this isn't sustainable way of living for modern world (if ur not lucky gigachad with very healthy initial conditions ofc).

2026-01-19 12:25:32 UTC

- reply

These are my thoughts out loud. I wanted to share them for a long time, but I was busy with my hobbies, work and constructing new meaning in life.

2026-01-19 12:15:47 UTC

- reply

"Haha! That what silly girls would say!"
I don't pretend to be otherwise. That's my natural position in life. Many of so-called "based chads" who criticize feminine people for "being too lazy and silly", have turned out to be just posers with no real masculine work like engineering frontier physical things with rational usage of resources (not just monkeyish attempts of "trial-and-error"). They are dumb at minimum, at maximum they are just finding scapegoats for lack of their own purpose in life. So I am not offended by them.

2026-01-19 11:37:37 UTC

My 2026 resolution:
If something bad happens, it's test for adaptability.
If something significantly bad happens, it's test for intelligence.
If something very bad happens, it's test for soul.
Under bad conditions only survival-related skills, analytical thinking and politics emerge. Use it only to protect from evil, do not fall for evil. Build good.
Creativity emerges only in true boredom when you're healthy, safe and own it at least.
Real change is slow, persistent, individual, decentralized and with good sense of civilization purpose this time.

2026-01-18 08:00:27 UTC

- reply

That's cool if this works for you! I used to sleep short hours in 2010s, but it did nothing better, with expect of that life sometimes felt like VHS movie while I experienced chronic depression (sorta awaken out-of-body experience) xD

2026-01-18 07:42:21 UTC

- reply

This is what Web 2.0 used to be prior to enshitiffication

2026-01-11 12:16:08 UTC

- reply

I just look at what person makes as a primary filter. If I could not find it, then check latest posts/comments in profile. Bots and irrelevant profiles never pass this test.

2026-01-11 12:01:15 UTC

- reply

...by brick

2026-01-10 17:52:18 UTC

- reply

Same. I only consider someone a friend if there is mutual help and relevant support for significantly long time. Until that I don't find a friend, just know someone. I also have few friends, but mostly I've firstly met them in the Internet. Then meeting in IRL, then going back to distances. But still friends though physically distributed (which is better I think).

2026-01-10 14:52:23 UTC

- reply

Playing with non-deterministic algorithms like one which I made ~2 years ago

2026-01-10 14:49:35 UTC

Surprisingly, I found more real friends in the Internet than IRL. This is what's needed to know about "offline makes connections more authentic".

2026-01-10 14:37:27 UTC

V4V culture is probably basics for marginalizing parasites

2026-01-10 14:33:14 UTC

- reply

They want but what they give?

2026-01-10 14:30:36 UTC

- reply

This is about the whole idea of "growing Nostr", "death of Nostr". Nostr is and will be live when there are people interested in running relays, developing/maintaining protocol and apps.

2026-01-10 14:09:40 UTC

- reply

*sigh* Media cons confuse platform with protocol

2026-01-10 13:57:52 UTC

Relation between informational entropy and probability of event feels natural in choice between "informational bubble" and "observing bitter reality". If event affects my life, then it's good to take it into account. If I can do something good with it, then it's meaningful. If I cannot do something good with it, then why should bother about it. If I can't find "why" on myself, then it's completely meaningless.
#slowlife #blog

2026-01-10 13:28:17 UTC

Peaceful travel for consciousness
https://image.nostr.build/ed0af0d582440440597305d9cf5bc54bbaef333cc7ae8b1b2fa45860c9cdb6c2.gif #nevent1q…5uyr

2026-01-07 16:32:16 UTC

Travel of New Renaissance
https://image.nostr.build/5461d21e385cc8b75ccafd6dadcb6b58743fd7025daf26b0d0dd6c07bcc26609.png

2026-01-07 16:31:33 UTC

Travel of New Renaissance

2026-01-07 13:57:51 UTC

Merry Christmas 🎄️🎉⭐️🎁️❤️🎉🕊️🎁️💜️🎉❄️✴️

2026-01-07 09:13:57 UTC

- reply

What I've needed is plain text note taking + executing code inline for routine activities with feedback loops and interesting demos. Jupyter Notebook is good choice for this. Any coding editor for me seems to be focused on coding specific project, not journaling with interactive examples

2026-01-06 16:05:41 UTC

- reply

Just try it

2026-01-06 16:01:57 UTC

I was taking plain text notes for 2 years. This worked fine when I had few unique notes and some repetitive notes. Then, after I experienced more moments in my life, this became cumbersome to take them day to day. I tried to split notes by banger and cute sections at some point. This eased note taking and reading them. I even could fit short fictional story in between them. But at the end of the year, I felt fatigue again. Too many things were repeating in my text book, text notes was feeling less interesting to catch with them.
I also do handwritten note taking. However, it retained only for celebrations.

2026-01-06 15:48:20 UTC

I started 2026 year from migrating from text notes to Jupyter Notebook notes. This seems pretty fun.

2026-01-04 15:54:31 UTC

- reply

There are both masculine and feminine spirits.

2026-01-04 14:53:57 UTC

- reply

Sometimes it's for learning and CD, but sometimes some people are just s*t. Cancer also mutates and reproduces, from dead horse especially. What it lacks, is their own spirit. It doesn't produce original and useful for others stuff. It's always difficult to communicate with it and discuss something in constructive manner, no matter what context is. They basically eat their own s*t. Best thing is ignoring it. If it's aggressive, then learn and utilize it.

2026-01-04 09:19:37 UTC

- reply

Both

2026-01-03 15:07:52 UTC

- reply

Coding, posting on Nostr, making art

2026-01-03 08:56:58 UTC

- reply

Simplistic vs simple

2026-01-02 14:49:46 UTC

Hah. These bots never change: "dear friends", small quotes with shallow meaning. Classics...

2026-01-02 08:37:59 UTC

- reply

Or just people like him do this intentionally, to further break up society.

2026-01-02 08:35:56 UTC

- reply

P.S. Unfortunately, there are still retards who think that you can build good things by forcing cohesion between people.

2026-01-02 08:04:15 UTC

- reply

Thank you! ❤️
I'm safe. Though having very stressful days. I drank a bit of whiskey for this xD
Java was just very popular among newbies back then. I know him IRL and I studied with him in the same university. At the first grade of uni when I met him, I was junior dev who just finished one year of working at small local company. I never coded in Java back then, but in JavaScript, Python and some PHP. Probably we matched by shared interest in programming, Eastern philosophies and by some degree of a fact that he's vegetarian. I was not vegetarian and am not. Though I tried go veg for 3 years straight prior to the first date year, to find an "inner peace" in chronic depression while lacking F things.
What did you share in common with your (former?) friend?

2026-01-01 16:13:32 UTC

Just broke up with a "friend" who wasted my attention on pseudo-philosophical discussions and was indirectly threatening me with a possibility of hard physical damage through poetic mentions. I asked him to be clear in his questions but he still rejected it with arcane quotes. Then he completely deleted our dialogue. Two months ago he indirectly threatened me with AI deepfakes. In December of 2025 he offered me creative collaboration without clear agenda/idea (or at least offer a channel where it can be discussed clearly). Even tho we were friends.
In the previous year I knew intuitively that something was wrong in our relationship. We made one small real project on which I tutored him. In 2020 I also tutored him on another collaborative Java project with depth of programming patterns. However, he lacked genuine interest and consistency and he abandoned his learning with no useful or creative/interesting results in pet projects. He could not even consciously admit what were the problems in his path, why he even needed to start programming at all. Then after failure he just jumped to producing AI "art" with no original value or effort in sharing it. With all that he was not even bothered by a fact that I have autism spectrum disorder and I needed to put in more effort in understanding cues than so-called "normies". But I needed to confirm my clues.
I have known him for 6 years 😞️
I trust my friends like all people do.
#blog #relationship

2026-01-01 12:43:37 UTC

- reply

Consciously(sic!) simple. Otherwise simplicity is just death. Happy New Year!

2026-01-01 11:38:40 UTC

- reply

Thank you for good music for this New Year's Eve!

2026-01-01 11:27:13 UTC

- reply

Happy New Year, fren! 💜️

2026-01-01 11:09:46 UTC

https://image.nostr.build/ff5ec2ee2808dc2b10a54b454fed86b4059e57563166d2158cd0dc948ec131e9.png

2025-12-31 10:31:30 UTC

Happy New Year! 🎄️🎉⭐️🎁️❤️🎉🕊️🎁️💜️🎉❄️✴️

2025-12-27 13:49:09 UTC

- reply

Any DB. Protocol does not define internals, but how you communicate with outside.

2025-12-25 17:54:45 UTC

- reply

I've written about it yet in my Christmas&New Year congratulation post

2025-12-25 17:50:45 UTC

- reply

Independent life is not only about one "variable".

2025-12-25 16:44:41 UTC

- reply

Merry Christmas! 🎄 🎁

2025-12-25 16:28:32 UTC

- reply

From what I heard in the "Heavenly Spittles", this is not just complex experience, but a progression of complexity which happens at critical points of exhaustion of combinations of reality in certain (local) space. Thus this feels like a story of Universe.
Have you heard this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDeiFfyftq8 ? For me this sounds like many such stories of different mid-Universes. IMO it's masterpiece

2025-12-25 15:02:45 UTC

- reply

Merry Christmas! 🎄 🎁

2025-12-25 12:03:32 UTC

- reply

Merry Christmas! 🎄️🎁️

2025-12-25 12:00:49 UTC

- reply

Merry Christmas!

2025-12-25 11:59:33 UTC

- reply

Merry Christmas!

2025-12-25 11:45:46 UTC

- reply

20-21th December also

2025-12-25 11:38:54 UTC

- reply

Merry Christmas!

2025-12-24 17:09:29 UTC

- reply

Thank you very much! This track feels like it tells a story of the Universe. Also I listened to other Blablarism tracks. They are denser in sounding patterns than chilling "Boards of Canada". Love them!