MercurialBeige

Doesn't brainwashed imply that the behaviour has changed
https://meds.lab.nyanide.com/media/79adabf0f4a29303cd6bc993daaced9b8cc392982778f794ea8be41d5dd7db00.png

2024-07-04 03:30:01 UTC

- reply

Well no it's either you need to be a family unit, you need to serve military time or you need to be a landowner but idk which one is correct
https://meds.lab.nyanide.com/media/580d6e571718d5e4c59c48f9f447bb154c9eff9dec0f26a1ac54c11c8a2e9c53.png

2024-07-04 03:20:12 UTC

- reply

link

2024-07-02 19:03:19 UTC

- reply

I'd think this marauder could still be 'archetypal'.
Are subversions of archetypes still archetypal? I'm on really shaky ground here.

2024-07-02 18:57:06 UTC

- reply

I don't understand what you mean by 'idiosyncratic', I understand the word to mean 'specific'. That particular story could still demonstrate a moral point, it'd just need to show realistic consequences, or present more information than is inside the main character's head.

2024-07-02 18:40:45 UTC

- reply

Do you mean that characters and events ultimately need to represent something 'real'?

2024-07-02 18:30:13 UTC

- reply

Is there an argument that presenting something in a world 'legitimizes' it, or endorses it? Or that you shouldn't present people with bigotries being otherwise good people?

2024-07-02 18:01:45 UTC

lets reopen this fucking can of worms what responsibility do people have when writing @npub1a2f…6pk3 [@vriska](https://lizards.live/@vriska ) @npub1sec…80c4 @npub1etx…hah0

2024-06-16 02:30:48 UTC

- reply

cc @npub1sr4…nj0q