monarx

Hey @nprofile…hslh, I absolutely love your work in this spaceI , however I notice the titles of the reads in recent years do not have the authors’ name, I like to find reads based on authors and this makes it hard for people to search for audible versions of articles written in the recent years from their favourite writers. Is it possible to add the authors’ names?

2026-03-22 04:29:25 UTC

WORD5 #534 3/6* (Hard Mode)
🟪⬛🟧🟧🟧
🟪🟧🟪🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://word5.otherstuff.ai

2026-03-21 13:45:02 UTC

WORD5 #533 3/6* (Hard Mode)
🟧🟧⬛⬛🟧
🟧🟪⬛⬛🟧
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://word5.otherstuff.ai

2026-03-13 13:53:33 UTC

- reply

same here 🤣
WORD5 #525 6/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛⬛🟪⬛🟪
⬛⬛🟪⬛🟪
⬛⬛🟪⬛🟪
🟧⬛🟪🟧🟪
🟪⬛🟪🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://word5.otherstuff.ai

2026-03-07 05:00:40 UTC

WORD5 #519 5/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛
🟪⬛🟧⬛⬛
🟪🟪⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://word5.otherstuff.ai

2026-03-04 09:37:34 UTC

WORD5 #516 4/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛🟧🟧⬛⬛
🟧🟪⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪🟧🟧⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://word5.otherstuff.ai

2026-03-03 03:52:28 UTC

WORD5 #515 2/6* (Hard Mode)
🟪🟪🟪⬛🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://word5.otherstuff.ai

2026-03-02 22:26:11 UTC

- reply

Reading this right now, free epub and pdf from mises institute

2026-02-23 01:05:29 UTC

- reply

To be fair Sessions has been having many guests who were vocal against core eg Simon Dixon and Jack Kruse, but yea no mention of BIP110, I may be wrong tho

2026-02-21 22:10:04 UTC

- reply

no comment? @npub1t04…53m9

2026-02-21 02:04:00 UTC

- reply

maybe 🤔🤔🤔🤔

2026-02-20 22:32:15 UTC

- reply

yea, people who dont gaslight and make ad hominem attacks, shocker i know

2026-02-20 22:18:43 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…m5cr runs knots? oh
@nprofile…kptv supports it too? hmm
@nprofile…dytu and Dr JackKruse too?
@nprofile…stwk and @npub1lh2…a9nk must be doing some voodoo shit to have these savages run knots eh

2026-02-20 21:49:31 UTC

- reply

yikes

2026-02-18 11:53:32 UTC

WORD5 #502 4/6
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟪⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://word5.otherstuff.ai

2026-02-14 09:12:23 UTC

WORD5 #498 4/6
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟪⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟪⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://word5.otherstuff.ai

2026-02-13 10:37:44 UTC

- reply

well said, could be applied to almost any topic

2026-02-12 04:37:36 UTC

- reply

how do we use this?

2026-02-09 01:19:20 UTC

- reply

BLOODY HELL!

2026-02-01 07:46:32 UTC

- reply

knew something was up with him when he doesn’t hold a strong opinion on core v knots and just defer it to the “free market”
what shitcoin did he shill and when?

2026-01-27 01:44:45 UTC

- reply

I guess.. regardless of what they may think of myself even. Hopefully just planting the seed is enough. Gotta adopt a low time preference even in the spreading of our message huh 😕

2026-01-27 00:38:10 UTC

- reply

some people don’t wish to see the world that way, the self delusion is so strong there’s really nothing we can do about it

2026-01-24 21:34:55 UTC

- reply

why aren’t you replying to the most recent replies? inconvenient?

2026-01-24 14:24:07 UTC

- reply

Mr. Robot
Breaking Bad
Dark
Mindhunter
Chernobyl

2026-01-24 14:21:46 UTC

- reply

Extremely bullish on freedom

2026-01-24 14:20:59 UTC

Almost everyday i pop onto nostr to find someone vibecoded an incredible app that used to be centralised. A few days ago it was ride-hailing, today it is dropbox style filesharing.
Simply incredible

2026-01-15 09:37:05 UTC

- reply

When Singapore? 🇸🇬

2026-01-12 22:27:22 UTC

- reply

lol you’re the one making the claim here, and I’m pointing out the illogical conclusion that you make. According to your logic, if the electronics that you use in your own life is getting its electricity from a non-renewable source, they are producing emissions 🤣🤣

2026-01-12 22:18:41 UTC

- reply

Then by your own logic, electric vehicles produce emissions, your phone and tv and computer also produce emissions.

2026-01-11 03:48:25 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin mining doesn’t produce pm 2.5, just like how your refrigerator doesn’t produce it, or your washing machine.
Look up Daniel Batten. He’s doing a lot of work debunking environmentalists

2026-01-05 11:36:30 UTC

- reply

The mining machines themselves don’t produce anything except heat. Emissions depends on the source of electricity. The trend over the years has been towards more green sources.

2026-01-05 02:18:36 UTC

- reply

which is the point, to expose the problem first, and the problem is so deep and widespread it takes a whole book to explain it

2026-01-04 05:22:17 UTC

- reply

huh?

2026-01-03 10:06:40 UTC

- reply

people don’t have ideas, ideas have people.

2025-12-31 02:39:28 UTC

- reply

Just like Bitcoin mining, there will be data centers that use fossil fuels and those who don’t.

2025-12-26 01:53:37 UTC

- reply

Re: custodians, Im not quite sure if I completely agree with you.
Multi Institutional Custody seems to be a secure way to hold your main chunk of bitcoin. Third party custody is okay if they do not hypothecate your bitcoin and if you understand the risks.
I do believe however that we should spend with bitcoin as much as we can.

2025-12-26 01:49:22 UTC

- reply

Try using marshmallows to build your house Timmy.
Value is not purely subjective. It requires an object that can objectively fulfil the goal.
You can have your cardboard in the desert, I’ll have my bottle of water.

2025-12-26 01:45:58 UTC

- reply

Exactly.
They made the incentives favour paper bitcoin to take your bitcoin out of your hands.

2025-12-23 04:44:05 UTC

- reply

They seize the physical copy of seed phrases or private keys. They can’t seize it through the network itself. There’s a big difference.

2025-11-28 12:57:21 UTC

- reply

Not sure about Singapore, they have digital ID and currently building CBDCs. 0 cap tax has been the norm for tradfi for years, not just for Bitcoin.

2025-11-25 15:20:21 UTC

- reply

Then you haven’t really understood proof of work and why it is the real innovation.

2025-11-25 15:17:31 UTC

- reply

As I said, when the internet first came about, there were many other companies trying to create intranets and market them as a service. The open decentralised one won.
When bitcoin first came about, there were many other companies trying to create their own protocols and market them as having a unique use case. Will the open decentralised secure protocol bounded by energy win? Or is this time different?

2025-11-25 14:58:35 UTC

- reply

Telephone communications could not be built upon, unlike the internet, and bitcoin.
Bitcoin performs the base layer function of storing and transferring value in a decentralised and secure manner perfectly, and that’s all it needs to do.
Privacy tech or faster transactions are already built on layer 2.
If theres any more technological innovations on money, it will be built upon the bitcoin stack.
If the innovation is not about money, it won’t compete with bitcoin.
Just like how any communications innovation, like Nostr, is built on top of the internet stack, instead of inventing a whole new protocol that competes with the internet.

2025-11-25 14:42:35 UTC

- reply

Another analogy that tries to lump Bitcoin with technologies instead of a protocol.
Base 10 math is a protocol, all the theorems and formulas emerge from that. Base 10 math does not get replaced.
The internet is a protocol. Websites and apps emerge from that. The internet does not get replaced
It is easy to confuse bitcoin as a technology to be replaced rather than a protocol to have other things built upon.

2025-11-25 14:32:47 UTC

- reply

Ok so now your point is?
Look man I don’t have time to explain to you if you couldn’t get it. Protocols and technologies are fundamentally different. One’s winner take most, other is winner takes all. You either learn about it or don’t. Cheers and have a great week ahead.

2025-11-25 14:29:40 UTC

- reply

*Gestures broadly at all the shitcoins bleeding against bitcoin*
Idk bro you tell me

2025-11-25 14:28:41 UTC

- reply

Upgraded and built upon, exactly as what’s happening now

2025-11-25 14:00:16 UTC

- reply

Wrong. The internet is not crypto. the internet is Bitcoin. Cryptos are the various private and proprietary networks that tried to compete with the internet, but we don’t even remember a single one of them now do we? The same fate befalls on the shitcoins.

2025-11-25 12:40:38 UTC

- reply

has anyone invented a new internet yet? no? okay

2025-11-24 23:25:19 UTC

If our ego wasn’t at stake, bitcoin would have already been adopted globally by now.

2025-11-23 04:44:58 UTC

- reply

um, so what’s the quote?

2025-11-11 18:30:34 UTC

- reply

i would rather onboard a million more families than having a million dollar bitcoin.

2025-11-05 14:27:47 UTC

- reply

good point

2025-10-28 03:03:19 UTC

- reply

funny, tell me who made introduced inscriptions hack in the first place, and redefine datacarriersize to not patch the hack, and now use this hack as an excuse to remove op_return limits?

2025-10-23 00:35:54 UTC

- reply

shiiiiiiiiiiiiiitcooooooinerrrrrr

2025-10-19 09:28:22 UTC

- reply

Except this time they are the industrial powerhouse of the world. If they have enough influence they could dictate that btc is outlawed for trade, and to only settle in gold, because they could still centralise gold, but they cannot control btc.
With the coming AI surveillance tech and CBDCs, along with people not learning about self custody and buying derivatives instead, im not so bullish on btc adoption as i would hope to be
please correct me if im wrong, I want to be optimistic of the future

2025-10-15 04:44:17 UTC

- reply

? BSV case study?

2025-10-12 23:21:44 UTC

- reply

I’m on primal, it does have a report button but i’m not sure it does anything. Do you know which client has it?

2025-10-12 23:19:36 UTC

There’s been an influx of bot accounts posing as notable bitcoin personalities like Jeff Booth, Lyn Alden, Guy Swann etc. How do we combat bot accounts on Nostr? #asknostr

2025-10-09 23:59:17 UTC

- reply

May not even be that, the chinese chick in head maintainer role could very well be a Chinese state actor.

2025-10-09 23:56:49 UTC

r/Bitcoin is clearly maintained by core mods. Any mention of their malicious intent in changing the definition of spam is promptly removed and you get perma banned. They are directly censoring opposing arguments, the irony is astounding. @nprofile…2w3f @npub1s33…252p

2025-10-06 13:57:58 UTC

- reply

im sorry for you

2025-10-06 13:57:32 UTC

- reply

grasping at straws here

2025-10-05 15:14:56 UTC

- reply

175k

2025-10-02 21:41:55 UTC

- reply

I hear theres a open janitor position in the walmart down the road

2025-10-02 14:00:08 UTC

- reply

truth hurting your feefees?

2025-09-30 10:01:02 UTC

You didn’t miss the boat, the boat will always be there, just moving slower every year. But it’s still much better than sinking. #bitcoin

2025-09-30 04:11:54 UTC

- reply

target the idea, not the person. typical fiat clown world tactics

2025-09-30 04:10:44 UTC

- reply

yikes, got some dirt on you buddy

2025-09-30 04:04:53 UTC

- reply

such nearsightedness

2025-09-29 10:04:55 UTC

- reply

why wont core fix inscriptions?

2025-09-12 23:09:49 UTC

- reply

Singapore too

2025-09-08 22:43:50 UTC

- reply

Thimerosal is present in vials of multi-dose vaccines. Most vaccines now come pre-packaged in single use syringes or vials, eliminating the need for preservatives (Thimerosal). In 2024-2025 period, 96% of infant influenza vaccines administered were thimerosal-free.

2025-09-08 00:10:25 UTC

- reply

Theres more than 10 people behind Knots

2025-09-08 00:08:33 UTC

Just because it's impossible does not mean filters are not working. Law enforcement exists but does that mean crime does not exist? Filters work, if not, why remove the optionality at all? Do you think it is John Doe with a 9-5 who spends so much transaction fees just to add spam, or is it some entity with money behind them, if so what would their motives be?
Pictures are not money. Keep Satoshi's Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System be about money. No one is banning anyone from transacting MONEY with each other. Don't make this to be about censorship. It’s the same as:
Email spam filters,
Robocall blockers,
Clearing highways of obstructions.
All are safeguards, not censorship. They exist so the system fulfills its purpose.

2025-09-08 00:06:48 UTC

- reply

They don’t earn that much. At most 0.25 BTC per block, and thats the fee paid for an entire block if someone wants to fill it up with spam at 40kb each UTXO at the rate of 25sat/vB, which is already more than average fee rate.
It is not average Timmy working 9-5 who wants to spend 0.25 BTC to add spam, its entities with money behind them, and what could their motives be?

2025-09-07 14:47:34 UTC

- reply

If filters dont work then why remove them? Just leave them in then, LOL

2025-09-07 14:41:36 UTC

- reply

What this guy said

2025-09-04 22:28:24 UTC

- reply

LOL?

2025-09-04 00:05:50 UTC

- reply

Cognitive dissonance exists even in Bitcoiners