munch
tomato.guy

Public Key

npub13l9h3wvj62x99gv82rxk6maqcq9s3azg9rfdw26rdj5dy364cy4sn0me4t

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsgljmchxfd9rzj5xr4pntdd7svqzcg73yz35kh9dpke2xjga2uz2cpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0t0j9tt

Publishing to

relay.nostr.band

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub13l9h3wvj62x99gv82rxk6maqcq9s3azg9rfdw26rdj5dy364cy4sn0me4t

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-03-18 23:01:41 UTC

- reply

There is a need for decentralized lending (dare I say defi), using native Bitcoin as collateral. This would allow small businesses to fund short term cash obligations, to pay suppliers for example, without liquidating Bitcoin.
I will get in trouble for saying this here, but this sort of functionality exists on ethereum (and works well) but not yet for Bitcoin. The closest thing we have is centralized lenders like Salt which allow Bitcoin collateralized loans with high interest rates and a maximum term of one year.
I wanted to use my Bitcoin as collateral to buy a building for my business. As of now, there's just no way to do it.

2025-03-14 21:11:26 UTC

- reply

There are no just wars

2025-03-13 16:26:56 UTC

- reply

😂

2025-03-12 23:44:18 UTC

- reply

This is very cool!
#nevent1q…85ny

2025-03-11 17:13:10 UTC

- reply

Why should I not be able to use my Bitcoin as collateral to start a small business?

2025-03-11 15:42:51 UTC

- reply

Can we buy your rugs?

2025-03-11 15:21:57 UTC

- reply

Didn't know there were Canadian cars...

2025-03-07 19:21:01 UTC

- reply

Impressive mental gymnastics to come to that conclusion on socialism.

2025-03-03 00:19:42 UTC

- reply

US warships have been encircling China for the last 80 years

2025-03-03 00:17:31 UTC

- reply

Because corruption

2025-02-13 01:05:46 UTC

- reply

thanks for sharing! it turned out SO COOL.

2025-02-12 22:54:26 UTC

- reply

What a great explanation!
I think it's so important to recognize that words are not that which they represent, you are spot on.
I find it useful, too, to differentiate between a sort of personal, romantic, or even ego motivated 'love' (which people often refer to, myself included), and the sort of universal love which you mentioned is very close to compassion. This type of love demands that we see ourselves in all others, not just our spouses or our families. This universal love is selfless. And in it's truest form demands the complete annihilation of ego.
I love your interpretation 'diffusion of harmony and peace', fantastic!

2025-02-12 19:28:22 UTC

- reply

what does is mean to you?

2025-02-12 16:43:19 UTC

- reply

I think I see where you're coming from. In the context of a relationship, the act of staying, despite abuse, is not love. I think this should go without saying, but it is often confused because our perception of love in society is that it should be 'fought' for. But this idea is misguided, and I think that is your point.
I believe that suffering is part of live. I also believe that suffering and love are yin and yang. That is to say, one cannot experience live without also experiencing suffering. If you love your child, and you lose them, you will experience grief, suffering, BECAUSE you love them. If you did not love them you would not suffer their loss.
I think love also requires self sacrifice, or selflessness. If you love someone you will sometimes give up things which serve your own ego in order to serve them. You will be prepared to suffer so that they don't have to. This is an integral part of love.
Does this mean you should stay in an abusive relationship? Of course not. The act of suffering is not love. But you cannot have one without the other. This is just my experience.

2025-02-12 04:50:45 UTC

- reply

I want to understand what you're saying. So if I love a person, and they are unkind or abusive to me in return, and I suffer because of this, then I did not love them?

2025-02-11 19:42:20 UTC

- reply

Love is often suffering. I mean this, for example, by love for one's enemy.

2025-01-29 23:06:47 UTC

- reply

I'm having this same issue with plates... have you found anything that helps?

2025-01-29 15:28:10 UTC

- reply

Doesn't Strike use a bank account?

2025-01-28 22:19:55 UTC

- reply

I hear they made those in the 90s

2025-01-24 15:05:32 UTC

- reply

No, and you pay a spread/fee for each transaction. The fee is .79% for volume of $5000-$50000 each month. The spread is about the same.

2025-01-15 22:57:24 UTC

- reply

Can you explain the mechanism for how bitcoin 'eliminates' unproductive jobs?

2025-01-07 13:57:05 UTC

- reply

'obliterate consciousness' is on point!

2025-01-03 04:50:15 UTC

- reply

This is a good point. We are complicit in violence either way. If we do the shooting ourselves, or expect the police to come save us.

2024-10-02 09:07:07 UTC

- reply

I think you've missed the point

2024-09-25 15:30:53 UTC

If a person, hypothetically, wanted to exit partially out of a large Bitcoin position and pay minimal or no capital gains tax, how would they do it? #asknostr #bitcoin #tax

2024-09-24 11:53:41 UTC

- reply

zero knowledge proof of identity / stakeholding / citizenship?

2024-09-24 11:29:46 UTC

- reply

This is beautiful. Great job!

2024-09-24 06:17:30 UTC

Can anyone suggest a good book on the American food system? #bookstr

2024-09-11 08:24:43 UTC

- reply

I think the strength of the connection between individuals (nodes) is not implied with either anarchy or decentralized, only that the relationship between them is made freely rather than determined by central authority. In this way anarchy and decentralization are the same.

2024-07-31 20:02:49 UTC

Hello 👋🏼
Does anybody have any good nostr content recommendations for macro economics, philosophy, politics and/or art?
I'm trying to make the switch from Twitter, but I need to round out my feed a bit more, it's all Bitcoin atm...
#introductions

2024-07-27 21:46:21 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…ez9h