Cryptospook

Those who are actually qualified to talk about the matter are in consensus. Only the wannabe qualifieds are seeing things (i.e. conspiracies of woo 'big pharma' and the like). It would be amusing if not taken so seriously. Now it's dangerous because public health is endangered by antivaxxers who blindly follow the pseudoscientific nonsense.

2024-04-17 06:21:33 UTC

- reply

To be clear: real knowledge of the subject matter is required to be able to verify, hence leave it to the real experts, not to the wannabe virologists, immunologists, climatologists, etc.

2024-04-17 06:18:29 UTC

- reply

#ROFL blocking is the last line of defense for those who run out of arguments. You're even worse: you never had any.

2024-04-16 15:07:45 UTC

- reply

#phantasy

2024-04-16 12:21:07 UTC

- reply

There are peer-reviewed, serious studies that show that (mRNA) vaccines have saved countless lives, are safe and not weird at all. Electricity also isn't weird, once you're past the medieval what's that mind set. Neither is magnetism, lasers, nucleair power, the internet, etc. Embrace science, instead of remaining stuck in the myths and legends way of thinking of our primitive ancestors.

2024-04-16 06:31:41 UTC

- reply

pyramid scheme?

2024-04-16 06:13:23 UTC

- reply

type mismatching issue, not 'unmatching'

2024-04-15 11:32:11 UTC

- reply

IDIOTIC conspiracy theories :-(

2024-04-15 10:24:41 UTC

- reply

A bill banning bitcoin mining, authored by the communist party in Norway, was struck down by a majority vote in the Norwegian parliament.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/norway-votes-against-bitcoin-mining-ban
*2023*

2024-04-15 07:17:53 UTC

- reply

source?

2024-04-11 17:18:10 UTC

- reply

YOU ARE AS DUMB AS FUCK AND NOBODY THINKS YOU ARE SMART, EVEN NOT YOU, WHEN YOU ARE BEING HONEST TO YOURSELF. YOUR LIFE IS A FAILURE AND BY NOW YOU REALIZE IT.

2024-04-07 06:55:16 UTC

- reply

I can't see the lake, there's someone in the frame.

2024-04-06 08:23:51 UTC

- reply

Seriously? You're using ivermectin off-label, based on what you read on the internet? You'll wreck your health with this horseshit, if you're not careful! CONSULT AN ACTUAL PHYSICIAN A.S.A.P.!
#wellintendedgoodadvice

2024-04-06 05:54:01 UTC

- reply

In an age where digital communication proliferates every corner of our personal and professional lives, it becomes increasingly paramount to acknowledge the diverse preferences and styles of interaction that individuals bring to the virtual table. In light of this understanding, I must express my wholehearted agreement and deep resonance with the sentiment you've shared. It strikes a chord within me, echoing a perspective that I, too, hold close to my heart.
There exists, within the vast expanse of online dialogues and discussions, a notable preference that many, including myself, lean towards—a preference for responses that are both succinct and concise. This inclination isn't merely a matter of personal taste but rather an appreciation for the art of brevity in communication. It's about recognizing the inherent value that lies in the ability to distill complex ideas or thoughts into their most essential form, delivering them in a manner that is not only efficient but also crystal clear. Would you not agree that there is a certain elegance and potency in brevity? This is not to suggest that the drive towards conciseness stems from an intent to showcase one's intellect or to stand a notch above others in the conversation. Far from it.
The essence of this preference leans heavily on the objective of streamlining the communication process. The goal is to ensure that the core message, the fundamental point at the heart of the exchange, is transmitted and received with the utmost clarity and minimal distraction. This pursuit of clarity, devoid of unnecessary embellishments or a tendency towards verbosity, is a testament to the mutual respect participants of the conversation hold for each other's time and cognitive load. It's about making every word count, ensuring that each sentence serves a purpose and contributes meaningfully to the dialogue.
Thus, in expressing this shared preference for succinctness over verbosity, it is imperative to underscore that this inclination is far from unique or isolated. Many amongst us find solace in the clarity that brevity brings to communication, especially in the digital realm where attention spans are tested and information overload is a constant battle. The preference for concise responses over elongated prose does not, in any way, diminish the depth of the conversation or the intelligence of its participants. On the contrary, it elevates the exchange by prioritizing understanding and respect for the recipient's cognitive and temporal resources.
So, in acknowledging this shared sentiment, let it be known that you are far from alone in your preference. There exists a collective appreciation for the nuanced skill of being concise, a recognition of the efficiency and clarity it brings to our digital conversations. It is a reminder that, in the end, the essence of effective communication lies not in the quantity of words used but in their quality and the precision with which they convey our thoughts and intentions.

2024-04-02 21:04:32 UTC

- reply

I like it too. Very much.

2024-03-31 19:30:42 UTC

- reply

that is what darkness means to them, they who see themselves as the bringers of the light

2024-03-31 19:28:48 UTC

So it has begun: https://www.npr.org/2024/03/31/1241897770/bird-flu-dairy-cows-idaho-kansas-texas-michigan-new-mexico — the end is nigh (unless a #vaccine is developed in time) #birdflu

2024-03-31 15:35:24 UTC

- reply

You're clearly showing this behaviour yourself. Now what?

2024-03-31 15:34:17 UTC

- reply

Ah, there ye go laddie. Out of arguments ye are?

2024-03-31 15:32:23 UTC

- reply

Objective statistics don't show this at all. You're led by confirmation bias.

2024-03-31 15:31:10 UTC

- reply

2024-03-31 15:27:14 UTC

- reply

Don't be silly with your sheepish sheep emojis. There's nothing weird or unusual to the vaccines, as you well know. If you don't then you're clearly lost to the conspiracy theories crowd (a medieval, science denying, witch doctors adhering crowd).

2024-03-31 12:32:33 UTC

- reply

Conspiracy theories about 'mind control' alike powers that hide things from us and feed us false data don't have any factual basis and are as non-sensical as any other religion type reasoning.

2024-03-31 12:29:28 UTC

- reply

Do you have objective scientific data for your 'brick wall' conclusion? Or is this just a 'gut feeling' that may get us all killed?

2024-03-31 12:27:28 UTC

- reply

Self reflect on that and realize that's you who may be the 'cultist'. Climate scientists (real ones) are very worried, based on scientific observation (which is typically very different from pseudo science climate change denialism).

2024-03-31 10:35:50 UTC

- reply

We also would like to move to Spain but are afraid to because of heat waves and droughts.

2024-03-31 10:34:31 UTC

- reply

Normally climate change is slow, but the current changes are driven by non-natural factors, which is extremely disturbing. The upcoming summer will likely already be a litmus test for Spain's future. Water basin levels in Catalonia are already at all time lows (15% or so). It's downright frightening!

2024-03-31 10:03:20 UTC

- reply

Sea water warming is even more disturbing and may lead to the collapse of the Gulf Stream current as early as 2025, plunging Earth into climate chaos (a.o. Siberia in Europe). It's bad, really bad and likely we're all doomed by upcoming climate change.

2024-03-31 09:54:44 UTC

- reply

That may be a factor as well but the whole Mediterranean is affected (Southern France, Italy, North Africa) so that's not the whole story. Climate change is real and disturbingly so.

2024-03-31 09:46:59 UTC

- reply

It's the other way around: anti climate change pseudo scientists get payed by fossile fuel proponents to discredit good, solid climate change science.
Drought in e.g. Spain, sea water warming are undeniable and very, very disturbing.

2024-03-31 08:52:05 UTC

- reply

None of these old wives tales have been scientifically verified.

2024-03-26 15:37:05 UTC

- reply

#ROFL ! You can't make this up yourself, this conspiracy crap.

2024-03-22 22:15:06 UTC

- reply

wrll, actually, no

2024-03-22 07:12:55 UTC

- reply

2024-03-21 19:50:07 UTC

- reply

this is good; Judge Dredd would like it

2024-03-21 11:44:09 UTC

- reply

No, I was thinking you're finding conspiracies where there clearly are none.

2024-03-21 06:41:22 UTC

- reply

Ah, you're of the conspiracy theorist type. That explains a lot.

2024-03-20 18:55:15 UTC

- reply

Source: Twitter 🤡

2024-03-20 17:02:24 UTC

- reply

Don't be silly. Leave it to the experts to define what is a vaccine and what is not. Also leave it to the experts to determine the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

2024-03-20 17:00:02 UTC

- reply

I'm not convinced by you saying "it's real". Verified science has concluded it was not a lab leak (origin: wet market). No offence, but I tend to take scientifically backed arguments from experts (e.g. Marion Koopmans) more seriously than amateur interpretations of arbitrary documents circulating on the internet.

2024-03-19 18:31:58 UTC

- reply

is this real? recent scientific research concluded animal market origin (no lt artificially created)

2024-03-17 21:30:25 UTC

- reply

yeah, right ('inspired' by I guess)
https://stonetoss.com/comic/bleeding-edge/

2024-03-17 17:21:47 UTC

- reply

Pythonh and Rust weekly, here on Nostr:
npub1uu3nu74wuk0xdp34h66em2gzt0qy24yxkwwpf7cp057w0f3ga53q00uzed
npub1pm0dtfu5zv2svykp8ngg02asnfrpjyuhtkupxczhhtcjx3nqv72qp76zc6

2024-03-17 06:53:58 UTC

- reply

he's a potentially unguided biological hazard, who doesn't want to follow health instructions that were put in place to protect other people because he's too arrogant

2024-03-17 05:29:57 UTC

- reply

Advances and hurdles on the way toward a leprosy vaccine
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3323495/

2024-03-17 05:01:52 UTC

- reply

"propagandists" the 'antivaxxer pseudo scientists' say, waiting to plunge mankind back into the dark middlle ages

2024-03-16 20:17:52 UTC

- reply

who else do you think is qualified in these matters? religious clerics? science has liberated mankind from exactly these medieval thought patterns

2024-03-16 20:02:22 UTC

- reply

science is what liberated us from the dark medieval times or witch doctors, myths and legends

2024-03-16 20:01:13 UTC

- reply

simply consult a qualified virologist or immunologist when you doubt the science

2024-03-16 19:59:11 UTC

- reply

I am actually the one who's yelling at a wall of anrivaxx pseudo science

2024-03-16 19:57:33 UTC

- reply

ah, that always happens when proponents of 'free speach' are themselves criticized! you're demonstrating the exact same behavior that you reject in others, which is a sure sign of a weak character

2024-03-16 19:55:17 UTC

- reply

what fiasco? vaccines and masks have saved countless lives. if there's another pandemic the previous approach has proven to be effective and should be repeated with extra vigor

2024-03-16 19:51:51 UTC

- reply

you are well aware they did and countless lives were saved?

2024-03-16 19:50:04 UTC

- reply

don't be silly. I think people these days feel they are entitled to endanger the health, even lives of others on the basis of silly pseudo scientific anti vaxxer objections to vaccination. i've lost family to COVID and since then think vaccination should be mandatory, as well as masks, when public health is in danger (which is decided by science and well educated people, with relevant experience, not by silly pseudoscientists or people incontent with with necessary restrictions).
#tythemupandvaccinatethem

2024-03-16 19:42:23 UTC

- reply

no, endangering public health by not following health instructions is irresponsible behavior and is quite despicable

2024-03-16 19:40:42 UTC

- reply

prove he's healthy

2024-03-16 19:39:31 UTC

- reply

prove he's healthy

2024-03-16 19:38:48 UTC

- reply

you don't really grasp vaccination, immunity and protective measures, do you?
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2557:_Immunity

2024-03-16 19:36:33 UTC

- reply

why? i don't care if he's sick or not, he should follow health instructions in public transport with enclosed areas. he's a potential health hazard, but can simply avoid exposing others by wearing a mask

2024-03-16 19:11:48 UTC

- reply

#vaccination should be mandatory and enforced, to weed out public health hazards

2024-03-16 19:10:02 UTC

- reply

i've lost family to SARS-CoV-2 hence have no tolerance at all for public health hazard idiots who ignore health regularions, mask mandates.

2024-03-16 19:07:20 UTC

- reply

the man is NOT innocent! he clearly ignores the mask mandate and therefore is a health hazard

2024-03-16 19:06:07 UTC

- reply

this man does not follow instructions and is clearly in violation of health instructions #despicable i've lost family to #SarsCov2 hence #zerotolerance for these #publichealthhazards
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/about-face-coverings.html

2024-03-14 07:41:24 UTC

- reply

Have you tried watching Amazon Prime via a VPN lately? Can't relays be as easily blocked by ISPs? (once Nostr starts flying high enough to ne detected by the censorship radar)

2024-03-13 14:06:40 UTC

- reply

#paywall 😵

2024-03-13 14:02:29 UTC

- reply

Jezus Christ --if he actually existed at all-- was a regular man. The 'supernatural' doesn't exist. There is no God. There are no gods. There are no supernatural beings. Religious beliefs stem from primitive people, who didn't have the scientific method to explain the world around them. It's downright childish to believe in god(s) 2024 CE.
#religion #god

2024-03-11 08:06:57 UTC

- reply

these anti social people who choose ignore health regulations should be disowned and banned

2024-03-08 08:24:18 UTC

- reply

Same here. Really liked it.
You'll probably also like this (IMDB 8.7):
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0407362/

2024-03-07 15:37:30 UTC

- reply

(your handle is a hint already)

2024-03-07 15:36:31 UTC

- reply

well... it's apparent from your responses that you don't understand, but apparently you think you do understand. there's a name for that.

2024-03-07 15:01:04 UTC

- reply

I meant "YOU silly boy" (not your son).

2024-03-07 10:42:42 UTC

- reply

he'll end up stabbing himself or someone else with that 🫣

2024-03-07 08:11:23 UTC

- reply

silly boy

2024-03-07 07:18:26 UTC

- reply

... not (why not indeed)

2024-03-07 07:16:00 UTC

- reply

teach your son to never stare at people (it's often perceived as an insult)

2024-03-06 11:54:50 UTC

- reply

there be more to this story, there is
https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/racist-white-supremacist-with-nazi-tendencies-jailed-after-sticker-campaign/

2024-03-04 08:56:53 UTC

- reply

#WhatCanGoWrong? 🫣

2024-03-02 08:50:30 UTC

- reply

That on the picture is as mainstream as they come.

2024-02-20 23:05:24 UTC

- reply

Conspiracy theories like these are completely ridiculous.

2024-02-18 11:54:53 UTC

- reply

naked man or men?

2024-02-13 20:50:45 UTC

- reply

Oh, you think that if you call it an 'interview' it's not propaganda what the interviewee says? Go interview a child molester and let him/her/it speak freely about his view on consent age, etc.

2024-02-13 09:07:24 UTC

- reply

facilitating propaganda for a hostile foreign state surely is

2024-02-09 07:36:38 UTC

- reply

Lester, you're as easily cucked as Tucker is, although he profits from his treasonous behavior.

2024-01-30 18:56:12 UTC

- reply

(long)covid? be careful too do too much too soon

2024-01-30 17:52:31 UTC

- reply

nitter died 🥺