Deleted Account

Public Key

npub13mhm4fxurhw4pz076twmqttwc03ge5wxdgulaakvp9pxeceaczdqyzv576

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsgama65nwpmh2s38ld9hds94hv8c5v68rx5w077mxqjsnvuv7upxsprdmhxue69uhhyetvv9uj6unsdyhx2er4vejk2epwdaexwqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0m2n9vp

Publishing to

relay-rpi.edufeed.org

relay.damus.io

relay.wikifreedia.xyz

hotrightnow.nostr1.com

relay.primal.net

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub13mhm4fxurhw4pz076twmqttwc03ge5wxdgulaakvp9pxeceaczdqyzv576

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-08-14 19:17:44 UTC

- reply

Kratter is the leading expert on shitcoins and has been dissecting them for years on his popular channel.
It turns out a new one has been born. The ultimate shitcoin. Already proposing demurrage and inflation bugs. Already being filled with spam and captured by the largest fiat institutions.
This shitcoin is now known as the Consortium Coin.
The fork has given Bitcoin a major upgrade. It lives on in the new chain.
Happy mining plebs!⚡️
#nevent1q…7mag

2026-08-10 23:41:20 UTC

- reply

It’s all discussed in the discord

2026-08-07 03:34:04 UTC

- reply

Not true. There is no need for relay protection in a softfork when we have a POW change.
Go back to playing with your LLM.

2026-08-05 18:33:52 UTC

- reply

lol blockstream … you mean the company running a cloud mining Ponzi ? lol 😂

2026-08-05 17:33:39 UTC

- reply

https://bip110.org
https://blossom.primal.net/bb704fbfff7a7c44b1690f42d07d63096944c187bef946d988f01a7591cb885d.jpg

2026-08-05 17:31:28 UTC

- reply

You didn’t read the bip.

2026-08-05 05:16:43 UTC

DECENTRALIZE EVERYTHING 🪢 run bip110
https://wavlake.com/track/f902882e-a623-44bf-8ed0-d052478f818c
https://blossom.primal.net/071c51569276978dbecffffaee690c8cb8155a643a75edec0eed290b28fa3d9d.mov

2026-08-04 16:54:57 UTC

- reply

Coldcard knew about the bug. Not a conspiracy.
Ignored the users who had their BTC swept in 2020. They blocked that user on Reddit.
They began a massive marketing psyop in 2021 to sell as many of these compromised wallets as possible. Nearly every podcaster in the space gets paid commissions/ ad revenue to sell an inferior product under the ironic motto of “don’t trust verify” meme.
In 2021 NVK knew all of this and started attacking and criticizing other wallets/devs online. Opensats stopped funding other alternatives because NVK was on their board.
The coldcard attack comes right before BIP 110 activation. Obviously planned because much of it is consolidated into a single address meaning these coins were:
A) a state attack never meant to be spent.
B) consolidated in case of a chain split since the reaction and messaging after the attack was to go to “centralized exchanges” and they could then have an edge and access to both chains.
Also boltz takes a precautionary shutdown of lightning swaps yesterday. They were also being attacked (though nothing was taken).
There is no coincidence that bitcoin is being attacked at the front of self custody and MOE level right before the most important softfork in its history.
The bottom line is:
This is a deep state attack on BTC. The Fabians know that a pleb movement that stops the Landauer attack, reduces data and keeps miners in check will be a massive threat to Bitcoin being sound money. The dollar is on the verge of collapse. IRAN and Venezuela were invaded to prevent a hyperinflationary event… and they cannot allow a sound, permissionless decentralized system to be thriving while fiat is vulnerable.
Bitcoin is the biggest threat to fiat to ever exist. They have been planning this attack for years.
Don’t be naive. Question everyone who makes claims that bitcoin isn’t money. Question anyone who peddles a BTC stonk, tells you to use a custodian or thinks that spam is not a threat because the attack is on the IDENTITY of the network.
And Bitcoin is money. Not a data storage. There is need for a third party. There is no need for large op returns. No need for a bank or other use case.
Run bip110
https://blossom.primal.net/46a91f6cb2951c636fad20f8ffa4de8ad5ca997f4bb6bad0771af6b6ea02a12c.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/7a3b836488f5dd3f730aa76b7c71dbe9d9b4750610e10650641211aca121e869.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/0dc1219b6e948f048660b41dba1f5aac646f1102c86b331ea882381e7ce10910.jpg
#nevent1q…fg0x

2026-08-01 23:08:24 UTC

- reply

He is based for all those liar posts. Absolutely hilarious 😂 doesn’t waste time arguing in circles with illogical idiots and just drives them mad.
Satoshi would be proud. No one has time for that shit.

2026-08-01 01:22:18 UTC

Fiat is the source of all psychosis.

2026-07-31 22:49:15 UTC

- reply

Nvk cannot respond right now because he is bitcoins greatest hypocrite.

2026-07-31 22:48:00 UTC

- reply

No 32 bits is unsafe.
@nvk is reason number 110 why I’m Running rdts

2026-07-24 16:35:06 UTC

Nostr is dead because of the block feature.
If you block an account, there goes 10% of the user base from your feed lol
Anyway to fix this? 😆
#asknostr

2026-07-24 16:31:45 UTC

- reply

Large op returns are not rare. They are happening every single day now. 63% of blockspace today is non monetary data. Most are large Op returns. You are either ignorant or straight out lying.
https://thebitcoinportal.com/bmhi/nodes

2026-07-20 14:23:38 UTC

- reply

Very good. A great cast with a bunch of different viewpoints going through all the FUD.
https://www.youtube.com/live/cTNddrUQ7jY?is=VXBjAOoLM61l2Fu8

2026-07-20 01:51:01 UTC

- reply

What’s the World Cup? I’ve been watching @npub1wnl…n3wr live 😅

2026-07-14 17:33:12 UTC

New track is out on Wavlake. 🛸
Spam Killer ⚡️
#BIP110
https://wavlake.com/track/bab9d10f-1879-414b-9682-00788f99cc01
https://blossom.primal.net/d091feed1c1c3636c0e59fabccb29c9fc6af7aec9cdc359c86b52173ead77a0b.mov

2026-07-14 16:41:59 UTC

- reply

Technically a 100% direct deposit into BTC is a DCA… and it has no fees on river too. I hate wasting sats on fees.

2026-07-14 15:57:10 UTC

Nothing worse than waiting for your direct deposit to clear while Bitcoin absolutely rips 🤣
Please go down first BTC! I need those cheap sats

2026-07-12 04:09:11 UTC

Running BIP110. Cause @npub15dq…lm5m and Epstein’s pal @nprofile…x6h9 said not too.

2026-07-11 20:41:21 UTC

- reply

I’ll check it out. Since when did primal not play embedded YT videos though :/

2026-07-10 17:46:13 UTC

- reply

Stand up then. Lol

2026-07-10 13:30:44 UTC

- reply

What about it is unsatisfactory?
Is there a monetary purpose to op return? Or taproot exploits?

2026-07-07 16:22:59 UTC

- reply

Nah he’s come around. Plus the ideas in what I’ve read so far have been aligned. I’m always glad to see people change their mind. No use holding it against them.
Hell I was running core last year before I knew what was going on.

2026-07-07 00:48:21 UTC

I take it back my guy @nprofile…0vkk. Dead wrong about your book.
Excellent points here. Highly recommend.
https://blossom.primal.net/d8ca1d3f16f60a9580d9dfa7bc33b6494c3ca4048fea3e2fcb0a0b3d2e4a0872.jpg

2026-07-04 20:07:45 UTC

- reply

Nah independence from the Fed would probably take care of the Isreal problem too lol

2026-07-02 10:48:44 UTC

- reply

How is making stricter rules for data on BTC censorship?
If that were true then this would be “censoring” users on wisp lol
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsqqqxa74ecnmmwpaycyz0sczl0rqp66qz9695gurxxtflyxndsamgfdm4tc

2026-07-02 10:34:03 UTC

- reply

This argument has nothing to do with miners shutting down, but miners ignoring the nodes.
If they ignore BIP110, and continue to mine spam and 70% non monetary data they are assuming control of the network… at that point Bitcoin is no longer decentralized and a government could intervene through law.
This was a part of the legal argument in the Faketoshi case (Craig wright)… he sued Bitcoin devs saying changes were made to the protocol… but the nodes were actually controlling the network so he lost…
Also BIP110 does reduce spam. It’s called rdts - REDUCED DATA Temporary SOFT FORK. If you read the actual bip, you see that it never claims to stop spam completely… its goal is to reduce the massive bloat now and prepare for other ways to stop it in the future due to Cores open door policy.

2026-07-02 10:00:01 UTC

@nprofile…z57s just made the single most important argument for BIP110 in this video:
https://youtu.be/_8QhtlEad8I?is=Jdd6UUeBkHgP_OaZ
Currently miners have the defense of saying that nodes control the network. If they take that control and ignore the nodes/BIP110, they have no legal defense or way to resist government.

2026-07-02 03:17:38 UTC

Sound money needs
Sound BIPs.
Fresh BIPs need
Fresh Sounds…
New tracks available on @nprofile…8jzn
https://wavlake.com/album/39e26e48-b966-4e19-b4fc-0e6792c800eb
https://blossom.primal.net/96e7e78548a943be52bcf5ba12bb847769e52fbf79bb7ce7d210eb376e82f6b1.mov

2026-06-30 09:01:55 UTC

https://wavlake.com/track/63ac2c53-0881-4274-993d-bac3dbad068e
https://blossom.primal.net/aa172d623cd06ff0640a85e15bfaa46a0b26980a714057bc0845dc3dac007e96.jpg

2026-06-30 08:36:29 UTC

- reply

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs8fqdxquje9xzw8025r84gu0ylzd9ukjmcr3g9p807p4jgugqjjfg3pt9a4

2026-06-29 08:02:02 UTC

- reply

It’s not a debate. Core has zero use cases at this point.
Since the date of the launch of v30, they opened op return for no reason, deleted wallets in a bug, leaked ip, made DEI hires of incompetent maintainers who don’t own BTC, it was also leaked that Core received funded from Epstien via MIT media lab, and Adam back literally went to the island.
I could go on for days of how destructive they are to Bitcoin.
They have not made a single coherent point against bip110 that has an ounce of truth to it.

2026-06-29 00:17:34 UTC

- reply

Imagine being so ignorant that you teach people how to run Core Malware and think that a client that is run by devs who don’t own bitcoin is somehow sovereign.

2026-06-28 21:59:26 UTC

- reply

Also Fees are just an economic deterrent, but they only work if the actor is constrained by profit.
If the actor is motivated by other incentives (like creating tokens, specific cultural/political expression, or running scams like runes or “Stablecoins on BTC”), they may be willing to pay whatever fee the market dictates… and they are doing this now. EVERY SINGLE DAY burdening the cost onto the node runner.

2026-06-28 21:52:36 UTC

- reply

So why aren’t transaction fees stopping this then? 64.2% today. It’s been 70% all week. The chain is accelerating in size, over 2GB a week. Most of it is non monetary…
https://thebitcoinportal.com/bmhi/nodes
Fees aren’t working… why is that?
https://blossom.primal.net/ea405aa2ff08e79ba4e032c4bf64f354928b67ca9677c7474768d6f27a1362c4.jpg

2026-06-28 21:31:31 UTC

- reply

Apathy… you literally agree with the main issue of spam and that core is compromised yet don’t want to fix it.
That’s some serious cognitive dissonance. No solution proposed… no actual reasoning of why the BIP is “bad”… you just think this issue is gonna fix it self somehow I guess lol
How much worse does it need to get? 99% non monetary data? We already are at 70% … and there are memes, runes and literally a stablecoin scam being run on BTC on the backs of the nodes.
A temporary soft fork is a conservative solution, and very safe considering there’s not even an URSF.

2026-06-28 21:25:09 UTC

- reply

lol how exactly can you fix core governance when they hired based on DEI, block anyone who disagrees with them, push controversial changes on BTC, don’t get paid in BTC or own Bitcoin, and literally were funded by Epstein?
They are worthless shitcoiners that literally peddle malware at this point. No way to save it.

2026-06-28 16:43:56 UTC

- reply

How is an alternative client that attempts to decrease chain bloat centralizing Bitcoin?
That’s completely untrue. What would centralize BTC would be allowing for this to continue so that nodes would require hardware run by company servers because of rapid expansion.

2026-06-28 16:30:11 UTC

- reply

“Censors spam”
lol way to discredit yourself. What’s the point of having a monetary network if you allow scammers and spammers to take over?
It’s not censorship, it’s fucking maintenance. Even Satoshi did everything possible to “censor” spam lol 😂

2026-06-28 12:43:12 UTC

I only zap you if you support BIP110. Nodes running malware don’t deserve Bitcoin. ⚡️

2026-06-27 14:20:13 UTC

- reply

NOT MY SATS. plus he’s got me blocked cause I called him out for it on nostr lol

2026-06-27 14:18:54 UTC

- reply

There’s a list of downstream effects of removing the Segwitt discount. It causes more harm to BTC as money and solves nothing…

2026-06-26 14:26:32 UTC

- reply

It’s incredibly arrogant that you would rather revert bitcoin to a previous state without lightning than admit you are wrong about core.
This is not politics. This is simply a defense of Bitcoin as a decentralized monetary system. There is no legitimate hard fork being proposed. It’s nothing like the block wars. Core has zero counterpoints, and there is no URSF.
RDTS, is a temporary soft fork with a fast growing base of nodes (more than BIP 148 had at its activation), mined blocks and an implementation that doesn’t effect Bitcoin as money.
What isn’t legitimate is CORE. Nothing they did in the last two years that was helpful to Bitcoin… it’s pure malware, serving only the interests of getting more funding, no matter the source and by any means necessary:
Core deleted wallets. They exposed IP. They received funding from Epstien through MIT media lab and Adam back went to the island… then they hired incompetent devs, who ignorantly made these radical changes to Bitcoin like op return blow out and flooded the chain with a stablecoin scam, runes, ordinals and even memecoins- not just “spam”.
This wasn’t enough for them. After that they sought to protect their dying reputation and funding with absolute lies concerning the alternative client. Claiming RDTS was contentious and irresponsible. They claimed it did things it didn’t, because the truth would lose their credibility as a dominant client.
The truth is Core is contentious and harmful to the network, not knots. Core is captured by corporations and are an enemy to Bitcoin. Full stop. Anyone defending them at this point is either ignorant or a fraud.
What’s even worse is your proposal to avoid this issue by going back to pre segwitt. A pre segwitt BTC would disable lightning (bip110 preserves this). Lighting was the mechanism that made bitcoin a more scalable medium of exchange and what made Bitcoin one of the fastest payment systems on earth. Hell, it’s the reason this app exists. BIP 110 doesn’t change this… your proposal does, for no other reason than to avoid the possibility that Core is comprised…
You are so terrified of what the Core supporters think, and wishing to remain in their inner group, that you have to run logical circles to defend alternatives. It’s making you look like a fool, when you have actually really great ideas outside of this issue. I suggest you take other look at RDTS and what Core is really doing then ask yourself:
Is bitcoin decentralized money? Or should it be a data storage system controlled by a bunch of centralized node servers? … because that’s where we are headed without RDTS.

2026-06-25 19:15:09 UTC

If the "bloat" continues to the point where node costs skyrocket, we aren't going to "upgrade" to better hardware. We are simply going to lose sovereignty.
If running a node becomes a job for a data center rather than an individual, the network is no longer Bitcoin; it becomes a distributed SQL database managed by a few large entities.
This is why we run BIP110 and reject Core.

2026-06-25 12:20:31 UTC

- reply

Nodes don’t get paid for storage of the data dumbass… Im not talking about fees, you deliberately are misinterpreting what I mean by free data storage. Fees just prevent minor attacks and go to miners. Csam, institutional attacks, and scams on BTC are essentially free at the expense of the node. If you really can’t understand how this is a security risk Im just gonna block you cause I don’t have time to explain this to you over and over again.
These fees haven’t priced out large op returns and we are at the highest level of non monetary data on chain. So that is evidence it doesn’t solve the problem. the incentive to keep bitcoin mostly non monetary is worth the price for bad actors.
It’s a Landauer attack on the nodes. This isn’t about segwitt or quantum. It’s about fundamentally what bitcoin is…
Is it data storage… or a peer to peer cash system? It cannot be both.

2026-06-25 02:20:45 UTC

- reply

Using bitocin as free data storage doesn’t scale. Satoshi wrote extensively on this.
Such ignorance. Keep the base layer free and lean. We don’t need any other use cases other than money or bitcoins security will be at risk… it already is 70% non monetary data.

2026-06-25 01:06:29 UTC

- reply

We got a new bitcoiner and ostrich here … hell ya 🙌

2026-06-24 19:19:52 UTC

- reply

lol core maximalism… you like getting you’re ip exposed and wallets deleted? 😅 what’s the benefit exactly?

2026-06-24 04:29:18 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/711c850d30e7f8b3bb8fb84ad198b56b682efd5a94c329eb9aae7fa8c605742d.gif

2026-06-24 04:26:52 UTC

- reply

If miners are the only thing that matters, why do we bother running full nodes? If a miner produces a block with invalid signatures, what keeps that block from being accepted by the rest of the network?
More importantly, If miners fill blocks with non-monetary data, are we still using Bitcoin as a monetary network, or just a decentralized data storage solution? At what percentage is arbitrary data okay? 60%, 80%? 99%?

2026-06-24 03:44:58 UTC

- reply

Best resource is the website - https://bip110.org
@nprofile…h34j also has a catalog of great short videos explaining the BIP ⚡️

2026-06-23 18:43:14 UTC

BRING BACK TOXIC MAXIMALISM 🛸
“On my node, on August 5th, I will be running BIP110. And I STRONGLY suggest you do the same…. Because this shit is showing on Bitcoin and it cannot happen.”
- Dr. Jack Kruse
https://wavlake.com/track/536edbcf-d0f0-4644-bc7e-a1fb3843ed33

2026-06-23 15:47:04 UTC

- reply

Bip110 doesn’t change consensus… that would be a hard fork lol
It’s reverting it to what is was in 2023… that’s why it’s a TEMPORARY Soft Fork. extremely disingenuous of you to claim otherwise. Or completely ignorant.

2026-06-23 15:09:56 UTC

- reply

What’s insane to me is the cognitive dissonance here: “Landauer’s original insight was that informational distinctions possess thermodynamic consequences.”
You realize that there serious thermodynamic consequences especially since we cannot erase data on Bitcoin without compromising it, yet you are literally an apologist for spam and non monetary use cases. That is throughly against what Satoshi intended with Bitcoin. He was anti- spam, like any rational developer is. He even incorporated filters to the mempool and wrote extensively about it in the forms and whitepaper. He shut down bitdns and wanted a separate chain so that bitcoin could scale and nodes wouldn’t be burden with extra data storage. He worked extensively to keep Bitcoin strictly a peer to peer electronic cash network. Nothing else. This is literally the same debate that forced out Vitalik and created eth.
Yet here you are constantly justifying using Bitcoin as something other than money, appealing to complexity and ignoring the fact that nodes are the mechanism which secure the network in the first place. Even worse is that you are pretending that it is non existent and somehow “undefinable” when the evidence is right there for anyone to see.
You said it yourself: “Protocol change is the Landauer Attack.”
EXACTLY. Core changed the protocol without consensus and opened op return. They opened the floodgates for spam and filled the chain with 47% non monetary transactions. How much higher does that need to be until it’s no longer fucking bitcoin? 70% 99%?
Core is the landauer attack.
The level of cognitive dissonance here is unfathomable…
Complete ignorance…. Hopefully it’s just because you have somehow gotten this far without running a node yourself, because if not, that would imply you are a fraud or scammer (because you are literally defending them).

2026-06-23 12:51:47 UTC

- reply

October 2025- The default ⁠-datacarriersize⁠ parameter was removed, allowing ⁠OP_RETURN⁠ scripts to be as large as the maximum standard transaction size. There was pushback and no consensus on this change, yet it was done anyway. Since then it was proven this change was implemented to better accommodate scams like Runes. There was also a bug which deleted wallets and users bitcoin.
I’ve read that letter before… it’s a bunch of PR nonsense that doesn’t address any of the problems they cased months later. Plus every single one of those devs are non Bitcoiners and some were literally only maintainers because they slept with the founder of Brink (the funding org to core).
And for that last part… I like Luke and run knots/rdts so I’m not sure what you are referring to with that last line… ? Maybe you just have no clue what’s going on?

2026-06-22 22:25:45 UTC

- reply

I suggest you look it up. If you don’t understand the Landauer principle you do not understand bitcoin.

2026-06-22 22:23:18 UTC

- reply

Core changed bitcoin. Bip110 doesn’t change BTC as a money. It’s a temporary soft fork… you should try actually reading the bip

2026-06-22 19:18:08 UTC

- reply

You have comprehension level of a first grader … I never said you had a podcast. Glad you don’t. That would be a massive waste of time on your part.

2026-06-22 17:48:18 UTC

- reply

The Landauer principle dictates that erasing information has a mandatory energy cost. It’s a basic and elementary principle of physics you seem to be forgetting.
Applied to Bitcoin, this is the argument for BIP-110: blockspace is a finite physical resource. Storing "arbitrary data" forces nodes to expend energy and hardware capacity for non-monetary purposes. This "bloat" which is being forced onchain from Core, wastes the thermodynamic work securing the network, pushing it toward centralization.
Bitcoin will not survive and come for “quantum bio” if it continues expanding 2-3 gb a week full of non monetary or illicit material… it will go extinct. Just like BSV, BCH and what’s happening to Eth and shitcoins right now that allowed for non monetary data storage and centralization.

2026-06-22 15:19:11 UTC

- reply

Kruse is awesome. I became a bitcoiner largely due to him. His perceptive on decentralized health and quantum bio transformed my own health.
But he’s got a few flaws too. That’s why I like him.
His advocacy for BIP110 is not one of those flaws. Probably his most important contribution to Bitcoin.

2026-06-22 13:14:00 UTC

- reply

Fuck off. Censorship of ideas is proof she’s a fraud. That fiat bullshit doesn’t belong inside bitcoin. She’s being pressured to censor from her sponsors and it’s proof she’s a fraud and compromised.
These companies funding podcasters are a major attack vector on the network.

2026-06-21 22:19:29 UTC

- reply

I have… been asking for what their actual proposal is for months… they got nothing. It’s controlled opposition and begging for money. Total scam

2026-06-21 17:54:55 UTC

- reply

Of course he is!!! He’s a maxi.

2026-06-20 13:53:54 UTC

- reply

If there is no product… and no service, and no real solution proposed … then asking for funding makes it 100% a scam by definition.

2026-06-20 02:33:41 UTC

- reply

Sorry you just paid for ai slop lol that dude is a dumbass

2026-06-20 02:29:47 UTC

- reply

lol production ready isn’t ready. It’s a scam, asking for funds without even a fucking single line of code.

2026-06-20 02:28:18 UTC

BIP 110 reached 13% today.
Be prepared for desperate lies and propaganda from core and spam apologists as this number gets higher.
These scammers will say anything to keep Bitcoin a free data storage pipeline.
Fuck them.
https://blossom.primal.net/e3dfdb94d45ea73b463fcc06dc5da235eb36972811570e8c9c7ebd8cc2c3258e.jpg

2026-06-19 00:10:33 UTC

- reply

Walker is cool. lol I think it’s just sponsors… that shit blinds you from the obvious problem

2026-06-18 12:08:34 UTC

- reply

Nonsense and ai slop of a book. Very disappointing to see booth shilling this crap.

2026-06-17 05:41:41 UTC

Disclosure will not come from the government. It will not come from the military or the political establishment. It will be fully decentralized, and available for anyone with an open mind.
It was an honor working with @nprofile…937u Lockwood on the album and https://kymafi.com. We can’t wait to share his story, the evidences of contact and the beginning of a decentralized disclosure.
Starting here on Nostr. ⚡️
https://wavlake.com/track/84d6b926-a5cb-4c7a-875e-45338fdafbee
https://blossom.primal.net/b215fae9545f352a8a808d715b712dc6149087081a4740280c84b09941bd8400.mov

2026-06-16 02:41:35 UTC

- reply

lol the author of “defending Bitcoin”, is pro spam.
Fucking hilarious. You can’t make this shit up.
#nevent1q…h2pm

2026-06-16 02:40:01 UTC

- reply

The answer is we shouldn’t be inscribing anything. @nprofile…l2ln obviously hasn’t run a node… or read what Satoshi said about data storage on top of Bitcoin.
IT DOESN’T SCALE. IT DOESN’T FUCKING BELONG THERE. IT IS SPAM.
Ask Eth or BSV what happens when you let scammers inscribe whatever they want…

2026-06-15 14:38:38 UTC

Bitcoin maximalism is not toxic. It’s potent. When someone’s sovereignty is completely watered down with fiat thinking, and misunderstandings on Bitcoin, it just appears toxic.
That’s only cause medicine isn’t supposed to be sugar coated.

2026-06-14 21:35:02 UTC

- reply

Deflation is always “awesome”, it’s only terrifying if the whole system is based on a debt based Ponzi scheme lol

2026-06-14 03:52:54 UTC

- reply

It’s what happens when you have the largest influencer grifting the space to buy his “Bitcoin stock” and the largest node client getting paid off to fill the chain with spam.
We are down over 51% since the day core v30 was released. Once we get rid of the malware, things will go back to normal,

2026-06-13 18:30:58 UTC

Stop saying you “buy“ bitcoin.
You convert to it. The fiat dollar is not actual money by any stretch of the imagination. Converting to bitcoin is probably the first time in human history one can actually make a purchase in a free market, so “buying” anything with dollars is simply succumbing to centuries of propaganda and an outright lie.

2026-06-13 14:57:00 UTC

Every person on earth thinks about money every single day.
Yet, almost none one actually studies what it is. Very few understand that fiat money has always been with us since the dawn of civilization.

2026-06-13 03:42:38 UTC

- reply

All “money” or metrics of value were also forms of fiat to various degrees. There was always a group ( priests, rulers or king) that defined the metric , enforced the ledger or token. The term fiat means “let it be done” … implying centralized establishment of the metric.
By that Latin definition (not the one defined by modern authority) Bitcoin is the first true money and first non-fiat currency.

2026-06-11 02:29:37 UTC

There is nothing “speculative” about bitcoin. This idea that it is risky is a form of thought control.
Every ten minutes there is a new block. You can store your value in that block or you can remain in the real speculative and fake paper.
The truth is: Fiat is the real speculation. It steals your time and energy, giving it to a literal cult that controls your behavior, information, thoughts and emotions. It forces you to use their fake system and bend to their manipulations of the supply to benefit those who control it.
There is nothing more speculative than relying on the fed, qe, qt, deferred assets or the infinite ways to print money at your expense.

2026-06-10 22:41:16 UTC

- reply

lol 😂 he can lie all he wants… my node is filtering that shit out.

2026-06-10 22:39:08 UTC

Yo #bip110
https://blossom.primal.net/8156c5681de7f7193c3779ee9cb594a612ffa7a19ac1f6c2e5a103ba06371a55.jpg

2026-06-10 22:17:40 UTC

- reply

Kratter had Saylor calling up his lawyers in a panic for sure 😅
https://blossom.primal.net/35056e99be102acb1f3bd08d75a41f0918477f59e312465bc2adefe26e0b1eab.gif

2026-06-10 21:57:35 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/59247273f9ffa8fe6ddf9e84dd5679acdedcc08f1bebcf84d0b6209d889a4e1d.gif

2026-06-10 21:54:37 UTC

- reply

Inflation is not a tailwind bro… 😅

2026-06-10 21:02:06 UTC

- reply

lol so an echo chamber?

2026-06-08 15:57:42 UTC

- reply

The btc/xmr chart isn’t just a fiat indicator. It’s comparing a fixed supply to an infinite one with similar properties. It’s the perfect indicator to tell what happens when you incorporate a fiat problem (inflation) into a decentralized protocol run by nodes.

2026-06-08 03:34:55 UTC

- reply

If you don’t see how that’s a price control… you deserve to get debased I guess.

2026-06-08 03:32:33 UTC

- reply

The illusion you keep failing to see is that fiat is not a free market. Never was. Monero can’t be since its infinite supply is debasing holders via tail emission policy (just at a slow rate). You can literally see this happening in real time in the BTC/XMR all time charts.
A hard cap is the first mover advantage for bitcoin because by fixing it, there is no altering the SUPPLY. Satoshi did this deliberately as a response to fiat debasement that has occurred over and over again throughout history. A hard cap is more true to a free market than any system in history. End of story. It’s the equivalent of the discovery of zero but for economics.
If the money itself is not fixed, then the economy is at the mercy of central planners, dev teams (like the case for Zcash and alts) or predetermined inflation (as in the case of Monero). If you alter supply or let it grow indefinitely then you get the cantillion effect (those closest to the printer get money first before debasement). In modern fiat these people are primary dealers and central banks. In Monero they are miners lol
In bitcoin, there is No cantillion effect. Just true supply (21million) and demand (conviction in early adoption, then later the actual pricing of goods and services based on perceived value).
The “security” argument is non sequitur as well because, btc has the strongest decentralized node network. You’ll see this in action soon with bip110. Security is fortified with honest nodes and not miners. No inflation tax needed lol
https://blossom.primal.net/e5dc7c2a9428c413f59e10996242581352292dfc025e13cde68ff41b56a78a69.jpg

2026-06-08 03:06:35 UTC

- reply

lol not the same. Bitcoin has a fixed supply.
There is no inflation of supply. That’s the purest form of a free market ever devised.
Not true in the case of Monero.

2026-06-08 03:02:25 UTC

- reply

We will see… Saylor only can be successful if the fiat price goes up, and adoption of Bitcoin as money goes down.
Not a good bet for the later.

2026-06-08 02:59:33 UTC

- reply

In Monero the devs interfered with the free market beforehand … that’s literally central planning. in bitcoins case it is a free market and always was.
Accounting for inflation in the protocol is doing exactly what the fed does… they only do it because they are based on debt and coercion. But it doesn’t scale for them. And it won’t for Monero. Just ask Weimar Germany, Zimbabwe or the French what happened….

2026-06-08 01:00:12 UTC

- reply

Wait Im not on x… did Saylor just buy a bunch at the bottom ? 😂

2026-06-08 00:57:51 UTC

- reply

Nothing wrong with trading. If you want to take your HODL strategy from a drunk gambler then be my guest. lol
😂
The end goal is renunciation of fiat in the end. Doesn’t matter how you get there. As long as it’s ethical and a good livelihood.

2026-06-08 00:52:28 UTC

- reply

Having no plan for drawdowns is literally gambling. That’s insane risk. Unless you can afford a massive 80% drawdown then using leverage strategically is an excellent way to go all in on btc with actually less risk.
Obviously too much leverage and not understanding markets is worse (cause you can get liquidated) but not having any strategy is foolish.

2026-06-08 00:48:43 UTC

- reply

You can get rekt holding too. If you bought at the all time high like I did (when I first really found bitcoin)… I went all in in October bro.
Fully rekt without leverage…

2026-06-08 00:43:40 UTC

- reply

you can also trade with proper risk management and roll all your profits into bitcoin to build a sovereign stack. Trading and leverage is just a tool. Sure it’s not money but you can’t avoid risk either. Stop pretending that HODLing is the only way to stack - It was literally coined by a drunk gambler 😅

2026-06-08 00:28:42 UTC

- reply

Literally not a free market though if there is built in price controls 😅
How is that better than fiat? At least the fed has better marketing and pretends it’s a free market…

2026-06-07 21:12:19 UTC

- reply

I can’t zap good content there. What’s the point??? Nostr ruined me.

2026-06-07 21:03:03 UTC

This is the most informative article concerning the BIP110 debate. It highlights what it actually does, and the various bad faith arguments against it.
Must read for any bitcoin node runner (core or knots)
https://melvin.me/public/articles/bip110-objections.html