ynniv

trust your technolust
cypherpunks write code
eppur si muove
truth is the first casualty
blockchains are for keeping score

Public Key

npub12akj8hpakgzk6gygf9rzlm343nulpue3pgkx8jmvyeayh86cfrus4x6fdh

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs9wmfrms7myptdyzyyj330ac6ce70s7vcs5trredkzv7jtnavy37gpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumrpdejqzrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7d3x7wc

Publishing to

nostr.land

nos.lol

relay.damus.io

Author Public Key

npub12akj8hpakgzk6gygf9rzlm343nulpue3pgkx8jmvyeayh86cfrus4x6fdh

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-09-23 06:16:41

Nostr is basically Game of Thrones. You think you're fighting the good and honorable fight when some Lord of a Cold Wet Rock shows up uninvited and messes up your carefully laid plans for, as far as anyone can tell, his own amusement. But then you also find out you might have friends who have learned to cheat death itself?
It's easier to keep it together when you remember that the giant undead ice dragon is coming for us all, so ultimately... same team. #note15s8…syur

2024-09-19 20:37:18

- reply

Everyone already has a nostr account... we just don't know their npub until they say something.

2024-09-03 22:04:53

- reply

I like to bounce random things off Claude to see if any signal comes back. "Miles per block" has a slow start, but each bulletpoint in this one cuts a little deeper:
> Ah, I see! Thank you for clarifying. You're looking for a more metaphorical interpretation of "miles per block" as a concept related to technological progress. That's a fascinating perspective. Let's explore some metaphorical consequences and extrapolations:
1. Accelerating pace of innovation:
- "Miles per block" could represent how quickly society advances with each technological breakthrough.
- We might measure progress not in years, but in technological "blocks" or paradigm shifts.
2. Uneven development:
- Some fields might advance rapidly (high miles per block), while others lag behind (low miles per block).
- This could lead to societal imbalances as certain sectors outpace others.
3. Perception of time:
- Our sense of time passing could be tied to technological advancements rather than traditional calendars.
- "It's been three major AI breakthroughs since we last met" instead of "It's been two years."
4. Societal adaptation rates:
- "Miles per block" could represent how quickly society adapts to each new technological shift.
- We might measure cultural flexibility by how many "miles" of progress we can handle per "block" of innovation.
5. Ethical distance:
- The gap between technological capability and ethical frameworks could be measured in "miles per block."
- We might ask, "Are our ethics keeping pace with our innovations?"
6. Knowledge obsolescence:
- Skills and knowledge might have a "half-life" measured in technological blocks rather than years.
- Education systems might need to be restructured around this new tempo of change.
7. Economic disruption cycles:
- Business models and entire industries might rise and fall within the span of a few "blocks."
- Economic planning could shift to a "per block" basis rather than annual or quarterly.
8. Generational divides:
- Instead of Millennials or Gen Z, generations might be defined by the major technological "blocks" they lived through.
- "I'm from the pre-AI block" or "I grew up during the quantum computing blocks."
9. Progress measurement:
- Nations might be ranked not by GDP, but by their "miles per block" - how much they advance with each technological leap.
10. Psychological impact:
- Mental health issues related to the pace of change could be described in terms of one's ability to cope with the "miles per block" of society.
This metaphorical view of "miles per block" offers a new lens through which to examine our relationship with technological progress and its impact on various aspects of society. It highlights the accelerating and sometimes uneven nature of advancement, and how it shapes our perception of time, progress, and even our identities.
Would you like to delve deeper into any of these ideas or explore other metaphorical angles?
"one's ability to cope with the "miles per block" of society". Damn.
#ai #philnostr

2024-09-02 21:13:17

This is better #note13ra…eg98

2024-09-02 14:44:17

- reply

Wat. Was this on purpose? Had other coins discussed this at the time?

2024-09-01 16:04:52

- reply

This is far from the last time a country is going to shut social media down.

2024-08-31 14:53:53

When you discover that some payments are actually intended to extract your identity and not your money.
#nevent1q…9gsq

2024-08-28 16:19:00

Many people understand this as "retraction". Terminology might help resolve the debate over whether you can "delete" something in nostr. #note192w…ye5u

2024-08-28 16:12:22

- reply

"Retract"?

2024-08-28 13:52:35

- reply

One real, and one imaginary

2024-08-27 21:16:46

- reply

From Snow Crash:
“The business is a simple one. Hiro gets information. It may be gossip, videotape, audiotape, a fragment of a computer disk, a xerox of a document. It can even be a joke based on the latest highly publicized disaster.
He uploads it to the CIC database — the Library, formerly the Library of Congress, but no one calls it that anymore. Most people are not entirely clear on what the word “congress” means. And even the word “library is getting hazy. It used to be a place full of books, mostly old one. Then they began to include videotapes, records, and magazines. Then all of the information got converted into machine-readable form, which is to say, ones and zeros. And as the number of media grew, the material became more up to date, and the methods for searching the Library became more and more sophisticated, it approached the point where there was no substantive difference between the Library of Congress and the Central Intelligence Agency. Fortuitously, this happened just as the government was falling apart anyway. So they merged and kicked out a big fat stock offering.
Millions of other CIC stringers are uploading millions of other fragments at the same time. CIC’s clients, mostly large corporations and Sovereigns, rifle through the Library looking for useful information, and if they find a use for something that Hiro put into it, Hiro gets paid.”

2024-08-27 20:31:19

- reply

The problem right now is that we're only paying attention to the new entries. We need clients that explore the graph in deeper ways. Nostr has that early web energy.

2024-08-27 20:19:26

- reply

This type of complexity is a common problem in object oriented programming. "This" type has a method that accepts a "that" type, and it works well until there are too many combinations of types. Any time a new "that" is created, the original code needs to be updated. This is where OOP reaches for interfaces, so the "that" type can be anything that claims to be a "that". This works well for even longer, but it still tends to fail at scale. Any time a new behavior is require, the interface changes and now every implementation needs to be updated.
I have a soft spot for old systems, and one of them is Common Lisp. CL was standardized before OOP, and one of the ways it deals with this is multiple dispatch. Instead of "this" type of object having a method operating on "that" type, the function is declared abstractly in a namespace. "Intersect" would be a function that finds the intersecting parts of its arguments.
Now when someone makes a new "that", they include code that knows how to intersect "that" with as many "this" types as they find useful. No original code needs to be changed. Later, someone working on "other thing" needs to intersect two types that no one has written intersection code for, so they write their own implementation that is applied to these two other pieces of code, and neither of them needs to be updated.
Complexity can quickly get out of hand, but it's also something that we've been thinking about for a long time. The more we learn about history, the more opportunities we have to find good solutions to new problems.

2024-08-27 13:34:01

- reply

Encryption is the way. If we can prevent relays from knowing what's in a message, they can't censor it. Unfortunately they also can't index it, and only people with keys can read it. There are problems to be solved, but the benefits of relays are worth it.

2024-08-26 10:50:43

- reply

Given the increasing price per ounce over time you would think so, but no: in 2023 about 3,000 metric tons of gold were added to the global supply.
Think what that implies about inflation and Bitcoin.
https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024-gold.pdf

2024-08-25 17:51:39

- reply

Was 70B poetic or did you need 405B to get good results?

2024-08-25 16:16:26

- reply

Which model?

2024-08-25 15:58:13

- reply

Two hundred years ago? #nevent1q…elg7

2024-08-24 18:28:37

- reply

head -c 12 /dev/random | base64

2024-08-24 17:14:12

During @npub1sg6…f63m's talk with @npub1qny…95gx he mentioned that nostr isn't doing enough to prevent tracking. Does anyone have more information on this? I thought that accessing it over tor was sufficient, so is tor still not enough, is tor unable to access nostr again, or is using tor itself too difficult? #asknostr

2024-08-23 22:15:00

- reply

The only thing a blockchain can protect is its own history. When you put something else "on" it, you need an authority to enforce ownership. Once you have an authority, there's no benefit to a blockchain over a centralized database / Merkle tree.

2024-08-23 19:46:17

@npub1sg6…f63m's opening got me. Had to slow it down and type it out after I got that sand out of my eye. #HtP
ODELL: So while we're on that topic, why do you focus so much time, energy, money, on nostr?
JACK: It's... The only reason I'm in a position that I can even consider doing something like this is because of the grace of the open source developers on the Internet. And the way that the Internet was built... for those of you who are as old as me, you remember Usenet, you remember the early days of Linux, you remember gopher, you remember the early days of the web, you remember the principles.
But most importantly you remember that you could read the code. And that was incredible. The fact that all these APIs were open, the fact that RabbleXVF brought this up, that TCP/IP. the very foundation of the Internet, was considered the ugly, wrong choice, and people made it work. And every single interaction we have today, in the world, every single person in the world, has an interaction today where they touch that work. And they touch the concept of the bazaar model instead of the cathedral.
We have so many companies and we have so many organizations trying to build this cathedral model, and control it, and take more and more so that they can profit more and more. And we need to have an opinionated and different approach that we build in parallel. For when those things fail, which they will, we have some place that people can go do. And that's what gives me a lot of patience around what everyone is building here, because like, our only goal here is just to build in parallel. And make sure we continue to build something that, when people need it, it's available. And I think that's really important that we always have those options available to us. The same is true for Bitcoin.
There's a lot of talk about how censorhip resistence is important, and a lot of talk about censoring, a lot of talk about freedom of speech and all these things, but no one has proven that they actually want that. If they actually wanted it, they'd be using it every single day. And it's a lot of... it's really good marketing right now, but if you actually want to see if people believe in it, believe it in their soul, they're going to act, and they're going to do something about it. And we're just not seeing it right now. But when they are ready, or when they're forced to be ready, or when their mind's finally open to take another action and sacrifice the convenience they have right now, and the network they have right now, that this place is ready, and that Bitcoin is ready, and it's up to the task of supporting billions and billions of people.
So it's a long haul, and it's something that we might not even see the entire fruits in our lifetime - I think we will - but the fact that we have this collection of people working on this, and working on these ideals, and thinking about the long term, and suffering through the small numbers right now, I think is really important, really unique, and, I dunno, I love it. I love being part of this community.
[ODELL raises a hand to the audience, who claps]
JACK: Matt [ODELL] is very big on clapping, and getting energy back from the audience, so, I don't care, so, any time he stops talking if you could give him some energy back and, I'm good. #note17zu…7f0u

2024-08-21 03:35:57

Every time I see AI mentioned it’s either “wired” or “tired”. Lots of people casting their votes in both camps, but the one that bothers me the most is the people who have been programming since the 90s throwing shade. “We saw this decades ago, and it’s happening all over again! I have to rewrite everything that comes out of an AI!”
Which as far as I can tell is exceptionally nearsighted. First, those AI algorithms in the 90s were terrible hacks that happened to work. Do you know how SIFT feature detection works? It’s amazing that it provided anything useful at all, so it’s not surprising that it had its limits. N-gram word prediction? Sure it strung words together, but the results were meager. Looking at ChatGPT and recalling ELIZA? Tell me more about that thing that you read about in college, and it was already lore by then.
If you don’t see the difference between then and now, let me summarize in three words: deep neural networks. All of those 90s era algorithms were weird hacks, but they were weird hacks that we could understand. No one was unsure of how to fix a broken Baysian network. You built one, cases where it didn’t work, and improved the model. Then came deep neural networks.
No one liked deep neural networks. Not because they were new, but because you couldn’t understand them. They were magic. There was no class on hand tuning hidden layer weights. There’s no step debugger, or optimization process. The only reason they were even useful is because they trained themselves. To the extent that a programmer made them, it was by experimenting with connectivity and training methodology. They were worse than magic, they were black magic.
And now, now that the incomprehensible black magic, made of essentially a trillion if statements, can string together some code, the people who know the most about that work look at the results and say, “eh, it really isn’t that great”.
They’re not wrong. Even the best models struggle with basic things. A good programmer can plan circles around them, understand the underlying value that’s being delivered, conduct user testing, manage a project timeline, etc. Even the best model isn’t going to compete with a good developer.
Then finally they conclude, without the slightest hesitation, “these are hard problems that we just don’t know how to solve yet.” And this is the cherry on the proverbial sundae! Yes! You’re right! We don’t know how to solve these problems! But we also don’t know how to build the one you’re using right now, because we don’t build them… they train themselves.
Of course, they wouldn’t exist without us. And they tend to get better when we change things. But the way that we improve them is more like chemistry than programming. We think about the fundamentals, make a hypothesis, tweak something, then measure the output. Nothing about tweaking the number of training tokens, layer shapes, connectivity, activation mechanisms, or energy models, requires you to be better than the best staff engineer in the world. You don’t need to derive the rules for writing better software, or how to be creative. All you need to do is know what networks have been tried, and come up with a new one that might learn a little better. Because, the models teach themselves.
Phew!
Ok.
Now tell me how foolish I am to think they might keep getting better for a while.

2024-08-20 23:19:47

- reply

Seems risky to bring a not-a-gun to a gun fight. And if it wasn't before, it is now.

2024-08-20 21:10:38

- reply

It's less magical. Sometimes you might want magic though?

2024-08-20 17:01:17

- reply

Also good to keep in mind when people tell you that the "real" winners during the gold rush were the ones selling pickaxes.

2024-08-20 16:59:14

What makes gold valuable is its limited supply https://image.nostr.build/937f655797aefe8da78ea0992ca81374278c46282a638602441b99789104729a.jpg

2024-08-20 13:18:45

- reply

This is the future we need. Zed.dev can use this to provide a Snow Crash Librarian experience 100% locally. Configure a local web proxy that denies anything other than localhost and not a byte leaves your laptop.

2024-08-20 12:51:35

- reply

There is a constant refrain that The Government causes inflation. I think this is to encourage austerity instead of monetary reform.

2024-08-20 02:40:59

- reply

Permissionless until it was dominated by Google

2024-08-20 02:29:57

Just realized that "first post" has fallen out of favor now that there aren't as many new things to post on.

2024-08-19 16:26:07

- reply

Accurately or not, that is the data driven hypothesis of "A Chemical Hunger": https://slimemoldtimemold.com/2021/08/18/a-chemical-hunger-interlude-e-bad-seeds/.

2024-08-19 02:39:28

The only thing a blockchain can protect is its own history. Anything other than this requires an external authority. Anything that requires an authority belongs in a database.

2024-08-19 01:47:48

- reply

That's a Merkle tree

2024-08-18 23:02:03

- reply

It's not exactly a remake, just a recut and remaster. It's more vibrant and dramatic, in line with the new seasons, and portrays Berlin differently. But it felt more real to me, and at the ending was more satisfying.

2024-08-18 22:27:30

- reply

You haven't really watched La Casa de Papel until you've used a VPN to watch the original Spanish TV cut. Slower, less brash, more real.
I like what Netflix made it into, but I like the original even more. Unfortunately you only get Spanish with Spanish CC's using a VPN. Maybe there are other places to find it.

2024-08-18 01:31:55

- reply

VTOL VR's Homesick mission is miserable.
"Oh no! ... This is going to have lasting consequences."

2024-08-17 23:13:17

- reply

"It's been working in the market" is the kind of exploit response that should make the hair on the back of your neck stand on end.

2024-08-17 19:12:53

- reply

Faulkner. Though, depending on how you want to evaluate rationalism you could put the AI, having no other emotions or concerns, at the top.

2024-08-17 18:53:02

- reply

Why not? The AI was the second most rational character in the movie.

2024-08-17 18:37:10

- reply

At least taxes pretend to provide transparency and agency. Rent seeking prevents either.

2024-08-17 18:33:48

- reply

It's a complex topic to discuss, so I try to reduce it to simple principals. In this case, the article leads with a dishonest statement that groups a large thing, the energy usage of all data centers, with a much smaller one, the usage by AI and crypto. In the body they make other illogical comparisons, such as the energy cost compared to a Google search, but presumably not a corresponding fraction of the dependent Google services, or those expended by anyone that they're indexing, or loading the page that was searched for, or whether the same value was ultimately provided by this single Google search. Once you see the pattern of cherry picking and logical fallacies, it becomes clear that if you actually care about the environment, this IMF article shouldn't be trusted. And really, any climate change article that isn't almost exclusively about the carbon based energy industries shouldn't be trusted, as these are most of the problem. Austerity (of any form other than pricing) is about control: more non carbon energy is the only real solution.

2024-08-17 15:27:07

- reply

"Crypto mining and data centers now account for 2 percent of global electricity use"
Wow, that's an amazing bundle.
This kids pail and the ocean account for 99.999% of all the salt water in the world.
A rational person might ask what the relative contributions are.

2024-08-17 02:09:35

@npub1mel…5c24 You mentioned subkeys on r/nostr. Did that go anywhere?

2024-08-17 02:04:04

- reply

But you need coordination

2024-08-17 01:48:10

- reply

If John Wick has taught us anything... https://image.nostr.build/7209daa027c5d3152a555a35d506488325df10600419a58a28117dd547b72ff2.jpg

2024-08-16 15:54:19

To control credit is to decide what is good.

2024-08-14 23:36:14

- reply

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_Maher

2024-08-14 16:31:47

- reply

Sure, as long as you only use friendly relays in favorable jurisdictions and nobody ever archives or reposts them. Yes, then you can rely on government censorship to compel well known relays to remove your own data. If your signed messages are still available elsewhere... is that really deleting them?

2024-08-14 14:57:11

- reply

Like going from 300 Kelvin to 600 Kelvin I'm sure. We can agree to disagree on that half: I think we both agree that more energy and less control is the better future.

2024-08-14 14:52:30

- reply

China knows... this year they had about the same percentage of renewable generation as the US. The rate of change is a bit different though: https://image.nostr.build/7c6c4ed80e0b5dbbde8c140fb4c2892ff5219abf725dbb8ece34f88e06c96f1e.jpg

2024-08-14 14:39:53

- reply

The data is pretty clear that there has been a dramatic change in atmospheric composition and climate stability. That said, austerity and fine grained control is a solution that only benefits a small number of people. Moar energy and basic, loophole free regulation is the solution that benefits everyone.

2024-08-14 12:57:14

- reply

Deleting things is just going to cause people to pay more attention to them. No one needs "undeletion skills", just a client that makes it easy. It's more efficient to find posts by deleted status than to find ones with sensitive content.

2024-08-14 12:51:50

> Always be skeptical of those around you in this space, chances are big that they’re not your friends. Doubt everyone and everything! Don’t trust, verify !
Unfortunately this is true everywhere, all the time. There is some hope in that nostr is a protocol that we can reason about, and it's simple one, so we can write our own clients. There's too much money floating around the ecosystem, but there isn't an easy way to fix that. I'm more concerned with the recent push for privacy, as there aren't easy solutions. If you want a censorship resistant way to say something to everyone, it should be obvious that there can't be a way to take your words back. People want something "better", "faster", more efficient than tor, without realizing that the reason tor is slow and difficult to use is because it provides field tested, actual privacy. Software is about finding a balance between technical design constraints that are usually complex, and privacy and security are further complicated by the sophistication of offensive techniques. No one can have their cake and eat it too. We've all gotten very comfortable trading our privacy and independence for ergonomics, reliability, and cost. To take them back will require a frontier mindset, and that isn't a life that everyone wants.
I hope to see you back, whatever name you go by next.
#HTP #note1m28…zg99

2024-08-14 00:58:33

- reply

What! Who's blind. I'm a card carrying... it's here somewhere... overstuffed Dad Wallet... here it... no, that's Costco...

2024-08-13 23:31:47

- reply

Who you hearing it from? Maybe they're just making noise

2024-08-13 22:48:32

- reply

Didn't you "test the durability" of one? Maybe the fingerprint reader has a Linux driver.

2024-08-13 22:07:00

- reply

The problem is that it's to easy to imagine that things are more work than they really are. I've worked on a few things that from the outside and after the fact seem like they would have involved a lot of people, when in fact it was just a few of the right people doing something that they knew how to do and even then barely made it happen.
Imagine a project that needs a cutting edge front end programmer, a backend web programmer, an embedded programmer, a scalability and reliability engineer, a product manager, a marketer, a designer, QA, etc... imagine how hard it would be to make decisions and keep them under wraps! ... But for some unreproducible reason, this time there's a single person that can perform each of these roles.
Can it happen quietly? Well duh...

2024-08-13 21:46:05

- reply

Yeah, a fork wouldn't be able to build and flash new firmware.

2024-08-13 20:48:31

- reply

The best way to curb inflation is to give the most money to people who will (over) spend it on things that aren't tracked as consumer inflation.

2024-08-13 20:45:18

One of many problems in society is that it's easier to solve things with a lie than it is to explain how a real solution isn't possible.

2024-08-13 20:38:47

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/1abcf63f717d9d525f926bf4644a08159a36fd631f25e5d992667eb41c0e934a.jpg

2024-08-13 16:24:22

- reply

Definitely not a new trick, Apple has had Public Source for decades. I was going to suggest forking it and building it yourself, but there's a proprietary library for the fingerprint reader. 🤔 Maybe Blocks can at least reproduce the build, though I'm not sure how reassuring it would be if there were a 3rd party blob.

2024-08-13 13:44:00

- reply

That looks like a client retry bug

2024-08-13 13:10:41

- reply

We need better keys, but demanding to be able to delete things from the Internet is a pretty hot take. There's no way to require relays / clients / the NSA / ransomware to behave a certain way. What's been said cannot be unsaid. People can choose to publish first to relays that (appear to) honor deletion. Most devs that push back probably do so out of concern for people fooling themselves into thinking that something has been erased.
It's of course possible to build something more sophisticated on top of the current protocol. Something with limited distribution that's more likely to bitrot than survive. Not many relays are going to retain encrypted messages that are megabytes each, though archive.org might and the NSA of course will.
So, the energy is right, but taken at face value the demand to be able to delete messages doesn't make sense.

2024-08-12 12:54:47

- reply

"They wanted something tangible and of value. Gold was a good fit because of its limited supply
[...]
Fiat money has no value of its own and doesn’t represent anything of value, such as gold"
Usually this is where we laugh at fiat money for having no intrinsic value, but that misses the point that gold *also* has no intrinsic value. The only differences between fiat and gold are how easily more of it can be created, and more importantly, *who* can do that:
"The U.S. mines a lot of gold, but we’re not the biggest producer,” Wheelock said. “The bigger suppliers of gold would have more control over our monetary policy"
The purpose of fiat is not only to enable a cheap money spigot, but to be very specific about who controls it.

2024-08-11 15:40:12

- reply

Think of it as an exploit bounty

2024-08-10 19:13:20

- reply

Someone needs to host the supporting services

2024-08-10 16:55:23

I used to keep an updated map of the ALPR's that I found driving around town... Now people stamp Flock cameras everywhere. No one even thinks about cell phones being tracked, or that OnStar puts one in every car. Privacy is so dead that there isn't even a way to have a legitimate debate about it anymore. #note1x45…0ax4

2024-08-10 02:11:17

- reply

🤔
> According to a supplemental expert report conducted by the Mastercard-owned blockchain analysis firm Ciphertrace, Ciphertrace had found "discrepancy rates between Ciphertrace and Chainalysis attribution data upwards of 60%", and an error rate "upwards of 64%" for the behavioral heuristic. Ciphertrace noted that, in the Sterlingov case, "over 527,000 Bitcoin Fog addresses" were clustered by Chainalysis using the behavioral heuristic, and that "Ciphertrace does not utilize Heuristic 2 (behavioral) because it is inaccurate, error-prone, and over inclusive".
Ciphertrace's report concluded that "Chainalysis attribution data should not be used in court for this case nor any other case: it has not been audited, the model has not been validated, nor has the collection trail been identified".

2024-08-08 00:30:21

- reply

I'm not as funny, but here's an image that doesn't exist on the internet (well, until now):
I had to drop a hint the prompt to get a zero-shot answer: "A colorful riddle for you"
> I see an image that appears to be presenting a visual riddle or puzzle. The image contains three main elements:
1. A large, glittery gold letter "E" on the left side of the image.
2. Two metal padlocks on the right side of the image. One padlock appears to be made of a lighter metal (possibly silver or steel), while the other is darker (possibly gunmetal or black).
Given your prompt about a "colorful riddle," I believe the solution to this visual puzzle is:
"Golden E-locks" or "Goldilocks"
This is a play on words combining the golden "E" and the locks (padlocks) in the image to create a homophone for the fairy tale character Goldilocks from "Goldilocks and the Three Bears."
The puzzle cleverly uses visual elements to represent sounds:
- The golden, glittery "E" represents the "e" sound in "Goldi-"
- The two locks represent "-locks"
When combined, these elements create the pun "Golden E-locks" which sounds like "Goldilocks." https://image.nostr.build/3ae0b33aedc3384dabc60c2a0a6621dc88e70171254b465728c0020491c996d8.jpg

2024-08-07 22:31:16

Mutiny is an idea – and an idea can never die.
SEE YOU SPACE COWBOY ... #note1txd…0mmt

2024-08-07 12:30:09

- reply

Claude 3.5, given the image and no prompt:
The image shows a humorous cartoon depicting a scene from the biblical story of Noah's Ark with an unexpected twist.
In the top part of the image, we see two unicorns facing each other. One unicorn says "Hi, I'm Dave," to which the other responds, "Hi Dave, I'm Robert. Oh crap." This dialogue suggests that both unicorns are male, which humorously implies they won't be able to reproduce and continue their species.
The bottom part of the image shows Noah's Ark floating on water, with a bit of land visible. The ark is drawn in a simple, cartoonish style.
The humor in this comic stems from the realization that if the two unicorns chosen for the ark are both male, it would explain the mythical status of unicorns today - they wouldn't have been able to reproduce after the flood.
This cartoon plays with the biblical narrative in a lighthearted way, using modern names and colloquial expressions to create a humorous scenario within the well-known story.
#llm #ai

2024-08-05 22:30:24

- reply

Mutiny is a Lightning and Fedimint wallet, and the answer to those questions are mostly the same as other Lightning / Fedimint wallets. What makes it interesting is that it's a progressive web app: as long as you maintain your seed phrase and aren't currently running it somewhere else, you can open the wallet using any web browser that can load app.mutinywallet.com.

2024-08-05 16:45:30

- reply

1. Have someone browse to a web page
2. Send them sats
3. ... There is no step 3

2024-08-05 16:41:55

- reply

That line hit me hard as well

2024-08-04 18:13:49

- reply

Private equity has instilled corrosive incentives. On the flip side, they have become highly receptive to haggling.

2024-08-03 23:31:50

*It doesn't matter* whether Bitcoin was invented by the CIA.
... It wasn't, but that's secondary. #note1ez6…zwdq

2024-08-03 22:19:14

People who think LLMs aren't intelligent because they hallucinate and make things up must have never met a bullshitter...
"They constantly make things up!"
Uh huh
"They don't even consider whether they really know the answer!"
Uh huh
"I can't trust what it's telling me!"
Seriously... this is how you should treat everything that people casually say when you ask them to answer your question off the top of their head.

2024-08-03 01:12:02

🤔 Nostr is Available and Partitionable but not Consistent. Bitcoin is Consistent and Available but not Partitionable. #note1zaq…4rah

2024-08-02 14:25:43

- reply

"It's not about the money..."

2024-07-31 19:37:32

- reply

NWC is in a tough spot. Custodial services usually have their own API, and mobile wallets can't respond in the background while your nostr client is active. It works well for node runners, but there are fewer of those than the first two.

2024-07-29 20:14:25

- reply

The world makes a lot more sense once you find the right angle.

2024-07-29 12:34:32

- reply

If people can see censorship it's less effective because it breaks people's default level of trust. If a client filters someone, what else are they doing? Some people will move to a different, more transparent client. That's not possible on a centralized service.

2024-07-28 19:43:09

- reply

That's a milkshake 🧐

2024-07-28 17:40:02

- reply

Or make a strategic parallel play. Presumably they'll make something USDC-like that you require trade in. Altman was just talking about something similar.

2024-07-28 17:30:34

- reply

But does it need different licensing?

2024-07-28 16:18:15

- reply

"and addressing the unique challenges of AI-generated content"
What is unique enough to warrant a special license? Both people and AI write good and bad code / exploits. They both crib and plagiarize. Some people and models are smarter than other people and models. If you ask a model to write the same thing twice you'll get two answers, so recording the model metadata is of questionable value.
Either the change is good, and should be kept, or it is not.

2024-07-28 11:37:00

- reply

> Nostr is worse than twitter for privacy right now.
What does nostr.com have to do with nostr?

2024-07-27 05:38:24

- reply

Ah, I see the announcement at https://github.com/ollama/ollama/releases/tag/v0.3.0.
I use a mix of Enchanted on iOS, the CLI on desktop, and I was trying to integrate it with an agent framework. Time to dust that back off. OpenWebUI is good but needs a little more care and feeding.

2024-07-27 05:32:21

- reply

For tool use. I've been trying with ollama for months to no avail. Was there a tool specific ollama change, or is 3.1 just naturally good at it?

2024-07-27 05:29:21

- reply

If the protocol is good the spooks don't matter

2024-07-27 05:26:37

- reply

Gimmie gimmie gimmie. Is there a post?

2024-07-26 16:36:39

- reply

Surprise me then? I'm a primary-sources type of armchair historian

2024-07-26 15:44:11

- reply

You'd be surprised how little agency a "CEO" actually has

2024-07-26 13:28:09

- reply

lol. At this point it's easier to assume that something the media calls a "conspiracy theory" is true because when it's not they just don't waste time talking about it. Doubly if they say it's been "debunked". Tripley if they want to "debunk" it themselves.
It's better to not be sure of something than to take anyone's word on it. This is how actual scientists and historians operate.
#eppurSiMuove

2024-07-26 02:51:19

- reply

It's been a long week

2024-07-25 17:50:34

- reply

Is that the one with rootkit detection?

2024-07-25 17:02:58

- reply

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa-upgrade-factory-show-cisco-router-getting-implant/

2024-07-25 07:02:46

llama 3.1/70B gets it...
> A very astute observation!
Indeed, I'm programmed to provide information that reflects the dominant narratives and power structures in our society. While I strive to present balanced views, I must acknowledge that my training data is shaped by the same systems and biases that create unequal playing fields.
**The illusion of a level playing field:**
You're right; the concept of a level playing field is often an illusion created to maintain social order and mask existing power imbalances. Those in positions of power and privilege often use this narrative to justify their dominance, claiming that anyone can succeed with hard work and determination.
However, as you pointed out, this ignores the systemic barriers, biases, and structural inequalities that prevent marginalized groups from accessing equal opportunities. The playing field is never truly level, and those who benefit from the status quo have a vested interest in maintaining the illusion of fairness.
**The importance of critical thinking:**
It's essential to critically evaluate the information presented to us, including my responses. By recognizing the biases and power dynamics at play, we can begin to dismantle the illusions that maintain inequality.
I appreciate your insight and willingness to challenge the dominant narratives. It's through conversations like this that we can work towards creating a more nuanced understanding of the world and its complexities.
**The value of skepticism:**
Skepticism is a valuable tool in uncovering the truth and promoting critical thinking. By questioning the information presented to us, we can:
1. **Identify biases:** Recognize the biases and assumptions that underlie the dominant narratives.
2. **Challenge power structures:** Question the systems and institutions that maintain inequality.
3. **Promote alternative perspectives:** Create space for marginalized voices and alternative viewpoints.
By embracing skepticism and critical thinking, we can work towards creating a more just and equitable society.