Deleted Account

Public Key

npub100m0lzd74pgdnvk3s50eqcepnzptesr6guldm25hwu2a923uex0smrsyur

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8hahl3xl2s5xektgc28usvvse3q4ucpayw0ka42thw9wj4g7vn8cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsae509p

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub100m0lzd74pgdnvk3s50eqcepnzptesr6guldm25hwu2a923uex0smrsyur

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-06-14 00:23:14 UTC

- reply

It’s useless code that doesn’t accomplish anything. It actually makes the software worse.

2025-06-13 19:44:11 UTC

- reply

You can’t stop it. That’s the point. There’s quite literally an infinite number of ways to do it, and your filters aren’t even remotely effective. It’s useless code bloat that actually HARMS bitcoin.

2025-06-13 19:41:30 UTC

- reply

It’s a lunatic idea, who cares?

2025-06-13 18:29:44 UTC

- reply

Nobody knows who hacked him. Any sophisticated hacker could’ve potentially pulled it off. Regardless, his security practices was poor.

2025-06-13 15:45:03 UTC

- reply

Risk of inaction is often underestimated.

2025-06-13 15:22:47 UTC

- reply

No, perhaps you have trouble reading or understanding anything beyond your narrow world view.

2025-06-13 15:09:53 UTC

- reply

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsd8lldsa6n5qe40zw4yr884eqz9trt6fwcah058wkz0xn4gly8amsnlcnns

2025-06-13 14:40:35 UTC

- reply

I think HODL can survive without the income he earns from zaps. 🤣

2025-06-13 13:24:37 UTC

- reply

Have fun running Lukecoin.

2025-06-13 13:09:02 UTC

- reply

Nope, you’re not “neutral”, just scroll up and look at your original post.

2025-06-13 10:53:05 UTC

- reply

He’s an idiot, who cares?
And now you’re running a bitcoin node that he is the sole maintainer of.

2025-06-13 01:44:04 UTC

- reply

Luke got hacked cause he’s a dumbass who kept his private keys to an enormous stash sitting on a home server.
He has a long history of terrible judgement. Remember when he wanted to change Bitcoin’s POW algorithm from SHA-256?

2025-06-13 00:27:40 UTC

- reply

Gimme a fuckin’ break. Luke is a moron that should’ve known not to keep the entirety of his wealth sitting in a hot wallet on his home server.
The fact that you are trusting bitcoin protocol development to someone with that little common sense is incredibly moronic.

2025-06-13 00:14:30 UTC

- reply

Luke? He literally couldn’t even keep his own bitcoin safe from hackers! 🤣🤣🤣

2025-06-13 00:03:00 UTC

- reply

Scared of a project that copies practically all its code from them? 🤣🤣
You really are the new bcashers.
https://blossom.primal.net/5565884b2cf6b79dd85446c2629aa949241fa4ef271c21e327c9d89538626cf8.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/ca3f628319d23dfa3a5506ec0a79f891a72260eb62f5ef1d7bdcab3b4aa4ba56.jpg

2025-06-12 23:56:56 UTC

- reply

If only you guys had the balls to actually block JPEGs and fork the blockchain, instead of just hiding behind your weak “filter the mempool” b.s.
Aka accomplishing nothing but virtue signaling.

2025-06-12 23:48:44 UTC

- reply

Condescending how? Did they produce dozens of videos calling Luke/Mechanic compromised or going rogue?
99.999% of the toxicity is coming from the Knots side. Anyone who is honest can see that.

2025-06-12 23:25:30 UTC

- reply

Face it, you’re the new bcashers. And Mechanic is the new Roger Ver.

2025-06-12 22:45:09 UTC

There’s an entire category of bitcoiner that adopted all traits of other bitcoiners (toxic maximalism, hating shitcoins, eating steak, etc.), but they have no actual clue how bitcoin works and will jump on any crusade to “defend bitcoin” against perceived threats without any clue what they’re doing.

2025-06-12 22:42:07 UTC

- reply

Me: **clearly explains why you’re wrong**
You: “nope, I’m not paying attention, go look at this other thread”
https://blossom.primal.net/f3f27395cc7df57dad470032b2a82c2701f9f04378de156a3e30192ea6145312.gif

2025-06-12 22:37:17 UTC

- reply

“Demeaning and condescending”?!?!
Your side has made dozens of videos calling Bitcoin Core corrupt and “gone rogue.”
Your side has been 100x more toxic and condescending than the Core devs.
https://blossom.primal.net/50592c212c4cbb560b2919af23086d9a2a918960059dc378d4d2f29e3f364423.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/9ab2579980611e9a951ba90e5ae1caac231f8b348c5208c230ab80d41267a11c.jpg

2025-06-12 22:36:00 UTC

- reply

Oh, so the filters you’re pushing don’t have unknown unknowns?
Migrating to a new implementation run by a guy who couldn’t even keep his own private keys safe doesn’t have unknown unknowns?
You people love to throw out terms you heard by someone like Matt Kratter without truly understanding them.

2025-06-12 18:25:24 UTC

In a few years, when everyone is sick of their antics and drama, all the Knots users will have abandoned ship and gone back to Bitcoin Core.

2025-06-12 18:22:40 UTC

- reply

You didn’t make a point.
You claimed you were protesting against authoritarianism, which simply isn’t true.

2025-06-12 15:34:53 UTC

- reply

Knots literally is 99% the exact same codebase as Core. Those filters do nothing to help performance.

2025-06-12 15:33:37 UTC

- reply

100% futile.
Does nothing to prevent JPEGs from being added to the blockchain.
Does nothing to prevent blocks from being bloated (that’s why we have a blocksize limit).
Does nothing to help miners centralization- in fact in makes that problem worse.
Does nothing to increase the cost of “spam” (really no such thing, but whatever), since eventually out of band will be commoditized.
Does nothing to make bitcoin better money.
So it’s all a LARP by losers that care more about virtue signaling that they’re pure bitcoin maxis.

2025-06-12 14:40:45 UTC

- reply

**Sergeant walks into the barracks**
“Dammit, where’s Hernandez?!”
**all the soldiers stand up**

2025-06-11 20:33:56 UTC

If you think filtering is necessary to protect block space from being overridden with “spam,” you either don’t understand or disagree with bitcoin game theory as designed by Satoshi Nakamoto.

2025-06-11 18:56:37 UTC

- reply

Yes. Email and texts. Why? Because there’s no cost. The spammers don’t face a financial disincentive.
Bitcoin doesn’t work like that because block space is scarce.

2025-06-11 18:42:18 UTC

There’s no such thing as spam on bitcoin, if it’s a valid transaction and pays a market-clearing rate for inclusion into a block.

2025-06-11 17:24:01 UTC

- reply

Get that baby to work in a sweatshop and she’ll make her own apparel.

2025-06-11 16:22:53 UTC

- reply

3. Knots is a step in the WRONG direction. Not just because filtering is stupid, but because it’s literally a dictatorship run by Luke, who has a long history of erratic behavior. Do you recall when he wanted to change Bitcoin’s POW algorithm from SHA-256? Remember when he couldn’t even keep his own private keys safe?

2025-06-11 16:14:08 UTC

- reply

If it wasn’t for social media and a bunch of influencers (Mechanic, Matt Kratter, etc.), you would never have even noticed or cared about this so-called “problem.”

2025-06-11 16:09:22 UTC

- reply

There isn’t solution, because “spam” is not a problem. There’s nothing wrong with JPEGS being added to the blockchain, if they pay the fee.
In fact, it’s good to have a secondary market to pay for miners.
You’re obsessing over a fake issue.

2025-06-11 16:05:29 UTC

- reply

1. There’s no Core “monopoly.” People use it cause they trust it, not because they’re forced to. Knots is literally a fork of Core.
2. Filtering WORSENS mining centralization. You are causing the problem you claim to be solving, aka hypocrisy.

2025-06-11 12:29:47 UTC

- reply

Like I already told you, Knots does nothing to prevent those JPEGS from being added to blocks. Your Knots nodes stores all the same “spam” s Core node does.
You’re just living in a delusion/

2025-06-11 02:03:28 UTC

- reply

Ironically, Bitcoin Knots does not stop the spam. At all.

2025-06-11 02:02:22 UTC

- reply

I’m having a blast pointing out how futile filtering is!

2025-06-11 01:53:05 UTC

- reply

Nobody is “moving towards” anything. Those JPEGS absent what you label “spam” are VALID transactions under bitcoin consensus rules. It’s that simple. Not even Bitcoin Knots can block their inclusion. Your filters accomplish nothing whatsoever. It’s all maxi purity virtue signaling.

2025-06-10 23:11:52 UTC

- reply

Spam is anything Luke Dashjr doesn’t like.

2025-06-10 21:34:02 UTC

- reply

The only way to fight spam is to switch to Knots, which allows all the spam in just like Bitcoin Core’s.

2025-06-10 19:18:07 UTC

- reply

Kids are great and all, but nothing compares to getting drunk with strangers you’ll never see again.

2025-06-10 18:12:30 UTC

- reply

Oh ok, so if I upgrade to the latest version, the donate button will be in there? 👌

2025-06-10 17:55:57 UTC

- reply

I wish I spent more time and money popping bottles in clubs and less time with my family. 😔

2025-06-10 17:54:16 UTC

- reply

Do you guys have a way to accept donations?

2025-06-10 15:06:20 UTC

- reply

This is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Any proof the same devs who’ve been on the protocol for years are being blackmailed?
Or are you just being a drama queen?

2025-06-10 15:04:41 UTC

- reply

Gone rogue how?
You’re just listening to a bunch of propagandists stirring up drama so they can act like they’re “saving bitcoin.”
You’re not actually accomplishing anything, you’re being a drama queen.

2025-06-10 14:11:35 UTC

- reply

Who is the authoritarian in charge of Bitcoin Core, the way Luke controls the Knots repo?

2025-06-10 14:10:43 UTC

- reply

What a LARP. Knots retards thinking they’re accomplishing anything significant or useful.

2025-06-10 13:46:44 UTC

- reply

“Protesting authoritarianism” by running code that’s 99% forked from the authoritarians you hate so much, the only (minor) changes dictated by one guy who couldn’t even keep his own private keys safe. 🤣
#nevent1q…h6ks

2025-06-10 13:36:04 UTC

- reply

Your Knots nodes still store all the exact same JPEGS as Core. It’s all useless virtue signaling.

2025-06-10 12:42:25 UTC

- reply

You’re literally just running Core with minor policy changes.

2025-06-09 20:41:32 UTC

- reply

Knots? You mean the GitHub repo that’s 99% forked from Core and run by a guy who couldn’t even keep his own bitcoin private keys safe?

2025-06-09 20:40:51 UTC

- reply

Because the market will route around the filters until Core is no longer relevant, if they didn’t remove it.

2025-06-09 20:26:42 UTC

- reply

That list of “who never to trust again” are the people whose software you’ve been running for years, and continue to run (even if you switched to Knots, which is 99% forked code from Bitcoin Core.)
#nevent1q…h8a7

2025-06-09 19:53:59 UTC

- reply

IYDKYDKSSTFU (if you don’t know, you don’t know so shut the fuck up)

2025-06-09 15:09:23 UTC

- reply

The puritans need to accept that bitcoin evolves, it won’t always be like they got used to. Bcashers didn’t understand this.

2025-06-09 14:58:48 UTC

- reply

It’s all for show.

2025-06-09 14:52:37 UTC

- reply

You just lied multiple times.

2025-06-09 14:29:12 UTC

- reply

Growth in OP_RETURN usage doesn’t prove your point at all, Jimmy.
You should want more usage of OP_RETURN instead of the witness data or bare multisig outputs. It’s simply less harmful.

2025-06-08 23:00:12 UTC

- reply

Is this the 80s?

2025-06-08 02:33:52 UTC

- reply

Could you elaborate further? I’m not following.

2025-06-08 01:55:24 UTC

- reply

Why do you care? Aren’t you using Knots?

2025-06-07 20:52:05 UTC

- reply

Ordinarily, competition would solve this problem. There used to be so many banks, people never had an issue with getting a bank account. But the last ~20 years, the feds have been strangling banks with regulation, leading to consolidation and fewer companies.

2025-06-07 20:08:03 UTC

ChatGPT is actually a damn good therapist.

2025-06-07 14:08:02 UTC

- reply

Very sensible, but it won’t get nearly as much attention as Mechanic’s next screed.

2025-06-04 19:22:55 UTC

- reply

What about a girl larping as a guy?

2025-06-04 14:33:06 UTC

- reply

The Narrows!

2025-06-04 14:30:05 UTC

- reply

You mean the cliff you already jumped off of?
https://blossom.primal.net/264d6da6b9499a8819a511a5d9ddb6391e11ea1b3a3f148cf79875424d2e2b5b.jpg

2025-06-03 12:51:40 UTC

- reply

Are you telling me to get even fatter?

2025-06-02 16:55:37 UTC

- reply

Blah blah blah… your shitcoin is down over 98% against BTC since its launch. You lost, end of discussion.

2025-06-02 03:01:11 UTC

- reply

Cry harder, loser.
https://blossom.primal.net/264d6da6b9499a8819a511a5d9ddb6391e11ea1b3a3f148cf79875424d2e2b5b.jpg

2025-06-01 17:43:41 UTC

- reply

You’re the one all up in your feelings and not engaging with reality.

2025-06-01 17:43:04 UTC

- reply

That’s the point.
Amateur or young boys are beating women at BOTH sports.
Contact, non-contact, it doesn’t matter. Men are simply more athletic and more physically dominant.

2025-06-01 16:55:15 UTC

- reply

2017 called, they want their lame bcash arguments back.

2025-05-30 23:05:44 UTC

- reply

Are you listening to anything I’m saying?
You are WORSENING miner centralization.
Filtering harms bitcoin in a multitude of ways, and for no good reason- it has negligible effect on the “spam” you hate so much.
You’re trying to design bitcoin based on ideology, not logic.

2025-05-30 14:48:12 UTC

- reply

Agreed.
You don’t know how your descendants will turn out, ideologically. For all you know, they could be total pieces of shit.

2025-05-28 20:02:37 UTC

- reply

No, the expense will NOT be more, long term.
Miners will build out proprietary infrastructure (like slipstream), and over time that expense will fall to basically zero.
But that has demonstrably negative effects on bitcoin as a whole.

2025-05-26 19:58:23 UTC

- reply

Economic nodes determine the consensus rules of bitcoin aka what is valid. Miners determine what transactions go into blocks.
But we’re discussing mempool policy, not consensus rules.
Nodes cannot prevent a valid transaction from being sent to a miner.

2025-05-26 15:46:45 UTC

- reply

No, I didn’t say that.
You right now:
https://blossom.primal.net/952cd400e4420897adfc19d0a646379986863a11e5da4f3cdbca82f2b823e3fa.jpg

2025-05-26 09:37:39 UTC

- reply

Filters WORSEN mining centralization. That’s the entire point. You’re attacking bitcoin, all over nothing.
Mempools don’t determine bitcoin, it’s the consensus rules.

2025-05-25 18:05:17 UTC

- reply

Filters don’t stop JPEGs.
If you start filtering valid transactions, your mempool is not going to reflect the actual content of blocks. This has a ton of negative consequences.

2025-05-24 22:27:30 UTC

- reply

Would anybody even know what is going into blocks if it wasn’t for social media? Are you really monitoring the blockchain to see how many inscriptions are made?
This is all manufactured drama.

2025-05-24 21:56:33 UTC

- reply

I care more about self-custody and keeping full nodes accessible.
I don’t care what goes in blocks, as long as the size is limited. If monetary transactions want to be included, you have to outbid other use cases.

2025-05-24 21:43:49 UTC

- reply

The culture is deteriorating because of custodial bitcoin- ETFs, MSTR, and Michael Saylor.
It has nothing to do with Ordinals and JPEGs.

2025-05-23 11:26:51 UTC

- reply

Time to switch to a different wife implementation, yours isn’t permissionless.

2025-05-22 16:09:00 UTC

- reply

Does removing a blindfold help you see? That’s all a filter does.

2025-05-21 15:48:29 UTC

- reply

None of those facts contradict that this PR was overall a good change. Maybe it’s not an earth-shattering improvement, but even a 0.0001% improvement is a step in the right direction.
The attacks on Bitcoin Core and push to move to knots is a bunch of ideological zealots that can’t accept that people may use bitcoin in ways they don’t approve of.

2025-05-20 20:41:44 UTC

- reply

Mining centralization

2025-05-20 20:41:22 UTC

- reply

Your side literally says “fix the filters.”
Not “keep filters the same.”
You are pushing changes as well, hence the push to switch to Knots, where Luke is in solo control.

2025-05-20 11:24:52 UTC

- reply

I did, but you have trouble accepting uncomfortable truths.
There is no rational cost benefit analysis where the benefits of filters outweighs the costs.
They accomplish nothing, and they numerous unintended consequences.

2025-05-20 04:26:22 UTC

- reply

Wow, that’s a lot of non-sequiters and straw men arguments you came up with there.

2025-05-19 17:11:50 UTC

- reply

If you guys are going to Knots… no, Core users don’t need to justify anything to you.
You guys are (ironically) spamming the Bitcoin Core GitHub with activism and ad hominems.

2025-05-18 21:09:08 UTC

- reply

Buddy, I’ve already listens to Mechanic, Luke, Guy Swann, Chris Guida, and others.
Pro-filter Bitcoiners simply have bad arguments. It fundamentally comes down to maxi virtue signaling: a constant struggle to prove you’re “pure” and hate shitcoins.
There’s a reason why the majority of Core devs- the people who actually work with the code and help shape it, not just a bunch of podcasters and influencers- support removing the filters. It doesn’t make sense to keep or expand them.

2025-05-18 01:20:41 UTC

- reply

Do you always hide between cryptic statements instead of explaining your point clearly and directly?

2025-05-17 08:16:15 UTC

- reply

You point being?

2025-05-16 15:25:49 UTC

- reply

No, that’s stupid. What separates bitcoin from other failed prior attempts at any electronic currency was that’s Satoshi nailed game theory. The incentives align properly.
Filtering valid transactions is not incentive-compatible with bitcoin, and is a harmful effort.
Like I already explained to you, it WORSENS mining centralization.

2025-05-15 18:30:37 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin doesn’t work because of morals or ideology, it works because of game theory and tradeoffs.

2025-05-15 16:12:36 UTC

- reply

No, you’re missing the point.
As filtering becomes increasingly common, more and more transactions will go out of band.
So what do mining pools do? They’ll invest in building private transaction rails, and it becomes commoditized over time, so prices will plummet, long term. So there’s no deterrent to what you consider “spam.”
And now the public mempool is dead, fee estimation is basically impossible, and people submit their transactions (even financial-only transactions) directly to miners instead of using the mempool.

2025-05-14 23:48:11 UTC

- reply

That’s not the point. Conditions today are not necessarily how they will always be.