Over the Moon

RoboSats coordinator

Public Key

npub10tm00n7rhl0c4fja7fr94fuyzzt04rhxkt2dzn7y8kt5uhde4wtq899xam

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs84ahhelpmlhu25ewly3j657zpp9h63mnt94x3flzrm96wtku6h9spz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsfwurrw

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub10tm00n7rhl0c4fja7fr94fuyzzt04rhxkt2dzn7y8kt5uhde4wtq899xam

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-31 10:20:53 UTC

- reply

To contact me on SimpleX or email, click on my coordinator profile anywhere in the RoboSats app. Under my profile pic you'll find my contact info. I'll need additional evidence from you to resolve the dispute as anyone can reply on nostr claiming to be your robot.

2026-03-30 13:21:03 UTC

TonalUpshot153 please contact me via SimpleX or email to resolve the dispute on order 10858. I do not offer support on Telegram

2026-03-30 13:14:58 UTC

UniqueTyme316 please contact me via SimpleX or email to resolve the dispute on order 10874

2026-03-30 13:14:07 UTC

SaintlyWorkout226 please contact me via SimpleX or email to resolve the dispute on order 10853

2025-12-02 11:39:55 UTC

⚠️ attention SweepingZabian557
Please send me an email or message on SimpleX regarding your dispute. I do not offer support on Telegram.

2025-10-26 10:54:42 UTC

⚠️ Attention robot UntriedShockwave28
You sent a Telegram username as your contact method, which I do not offer support on. I need information from you to settle the dispute you are in, so please contact me on SimpleX or email. You can find either in my profile anywhere in the RoboSats client.

2025-09-22 22:57:20 UTC

⚠️Robots in trade 5206 on my coordinator⚠️
Trade 5206 has been cancelled due to a technical issue in the #RoboSats client at the chat room stage. Your bonds have been returned.
If you would like to continue with the trade, you can restart it at this new order ID:
http://otmoonrndnrddqdlhu6b36heunmbyw3cgvadqo2oqeau3656wfv7fwad.onion/order/moon/5238
Sorry for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding!

2025-09-13 21:01:26 UTC

ShockingStigma527 please check the dm of the npub you provided in your dispute statement. You still have not responded to my request for more info and I'll be resolving the dispute soon. You can also reach me over SimpleX and email.
#RoboSats

2025-07-03 13:15:17 UTC

⚠️ Attention robots in order 3266 - UnwashedLaw923 and DisciplinedAsh634 ⚠️
Both of you have provided me Telegram handles as contact methods with your dispute statements. Note that I DO NOT offer support on Telegram.
Please contact me directly on SimpleX or send me an email. You can find my contact info by clicking on my coordinator profile in RoboSats.
#RoboSats

2025-06-26 10:32:10 UTC

- reply

Sorry I didn't understand your comment. Low fees is not signal?

2025-06-03 18:35:46 UTC

- reply

I appreciate it!

2025-06-03 18:31:09 UTC

- reply

LFG!! 🦾

2025-06-03 10:44:23 UTC

- reply

Thank you for your critique! I think you bring up some interesting points for sure. I will try to give you my reasoning behind my thoughts.
I would relish the opportunity to 4x my volume. Before lowering fees it was one or two orders of magnitude behind the well established coordinators, so still a long way from racing to the bottom imo.
I think having the lowest fees anywhere in p2p is only good for the platform and attracts liquidity and users from other less efficient platforms. It creates a positive feedback loop of lower prices and more abundant liquidity. This is only possible because the federation model of RoboSats creates the correct incentives for efficiency.
As for public support, I am active on the NIP-29 chat, for whatever reason very few robots use it. I do not offer support on Telegram and SimpleX simply does not sync my messages nor do I receive them in the general chat. However users have always been able to contact me privately if they encounter issues.
I think it's pretty basic economics to lower prices when there's too much supply of a similar good or service. I did so first because I had near zero opportunity costs, as my volume was already negligible. It does not imply lower quality of service. Other coordinators can also adjust their fee policy as they please, either to lower it or to raise it. Last time I checked we are not a communist price-fixing cartel haha

2025-06-02 14:30:46 UTC

- reply

I guess my brain is rather smol then 😅 but that is an option I will explore if volume does not improve
No, for me it is not profitable if accounting for hardware and opportunity costs on liquidity

2025-06-02 12:40:50 UTC

- reply

Thank you!! Every little bit counts

2025-06-02 10:17:54 UTC

LOW FEES
I have lowered coordinator fees to 0.1% at Over the Moon. This is a 50% reduction from the previous fee of 0.2%, which is what all other coordinators still charge at this moment in time.
The maker-taker split remains the same as before, at 12.5% to the maker, 87.5% to the taker. At 0.1% total fee, this comes out to 0.0125% for makers and 0.0875% for takers.
These are probably the lowest fees you will find anywhere on the p2p market. Consider that this is 1/20 of Peach's 2% fees, for example.
Why am I making the change? The first 7 months of running the coordinator has been a good learning experience and I am beyond grateful for the help and support I have received. However the trading volume has not meaningfully increased despite a bull market and the lifting of initial order size restrictions. Current volume is not sufficient for this venture to be sustainable and my resources are better allocated elsewhere at this rate. For the average user, there likely has been little to differentiate between the coordinators in the federation. Hopefully the lower fees will incentivise more trades and a more even distribution of orders hosted amongst the federation.

2025-04-28 13:01:46 UTC

- reply

Back online!
#nevent1q…0ynk

2025-04-28 11:55:11 UTC

There has been a blackout where the coordinator node is hosted, as a result there will likely be several hours of downtime. Sorry for any inconvenience!

2025-03-05 17:04:41 UTC

- reply

Replied on SimpleX

2025-03-05 15:51:50 UTC

- reply

More than enough 🐋

2025-03-05 15:43:55 UTC

- reply

tb1pjnnlv4a4ewnmpxud44r8uleqgljvc2hjv9sdcwf93utze5fsaa3sz3uwws
Can you send me some for testing the update? Thanks in advance ⚡

2025-03-04 12:17:17 UTC

- reply

TemporaryClove69, still waiting for you to contact me
#nevent1q…fu4k

2025-03-03 15:52:22 UTC

⚠️ Attention robots on order 1638 - TemporaryClove69 and UnreachableRail956⚠️
Neither of you have provided ANY contact information in your dispute statements. Please contact me directly on SimpleX or send me an email, you can find my contact info by clicking on my coordinator profile in RoboSats. Note that I do NOT use Telegram.
#RoboSats

2025-02-15 16:51:00 UTC

- reply

Perhaps we can use pkarr to pin a list of the various onions (but needs to republished frequently)
https://github.com/Nuhvi/pkarr
Or simply pin a NIP-51 nostr list
Or both

2025-01-11 11:33:20 UTC

- reply

What it solves is not dependence on the coordinator model but rather the global market liquidity overview. Orderbooks can be made interoprable as is already the case for lnp2pbot. This helps prevent users from being screwed by closed platforms like peach where they pay 2% trade fees + high premium because they have no knowledge of global liquidity

2025-01-11 11:24:38 UTC

- reply

No, the coordinator is still needed to lock bonds and escrows

2025-01-11 11:10:27 UTC

- reply

The RoboSats orderbook lives on nostr