snotklap
Snotklap

https://www.snotklap.com

I am my own God and accept no external authority figures.

Public Key

npub178ysc2ceq24y497lna3w08l70wh6dzd2me33l52fl69mj0zwd36sgxrtwg

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs0rjgv9vvs92j2jl0e7ch8nll8htax3x4duccl69ylazae838xcagpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsc2grmc

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub178ysc2ceq24y497lna3w08l70wh6dzd2me33l52fl69mj0zwd36sgxrtwg

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-08-01 11:40:33 UTC

- reply

The micro Python interpreter used the wrong random number generator function because they had the same name, so instead of using the coldcard function, it used the built-in micro Python one that wasn't secure.

2026-06-28 11:46:26 UTC

- reply

"This is going to be my last post about BIP-110."

2026-06-13 08:46:53 UTC

- reply

You miss my point

2026-06-13 08:03:30 UTC

- reply

Essentially, your argument boils down to this: "There isn't enough support, therefore it won't happen, therefore supporting it is irrational."
That shifts the discussion from technical merit to social conformity.
Your underlying message feels less like:
"Here's why BIP-110 is technically incorrect."
and more like:
"The majority won't follow you, therefore you should stop."
That's very close to herd-morality thinking because truth becomes subordinate to social consensus.
You're positioning yourself as the spokesperson for "reality" itself: "I don't know how you can be so stupid as not to see reality"
You frame reality as:
Majority = legitimacy
Minority = delusion
Success = correctness
Failure = proof of being wrong
You view disagreement as evidence of irrationality rather than a difference in analysis. This is a common social dominance tactic.
You focus on anticipating where the crowd will be rather than evaluating the proposal itself. Your arguments are heavily centered on social adoption, credibility, majority support, and conformity to perceived reality.
Even if BIP-110 ultimately fails, that doesn't automatically mean the attempt was irrational, dishonest, or technically unsound. Movements fail all the time for political reasons.

2026-05-30 07:43:35 UTC

- reply

Be careful. He’s going to accuse you of "not understanding any of this".

2026-03-12 18:41:08 UTC

- reply

Henry Miller said that if he ever came face-to-face with God, he would spit in his face. I agree.

2026-03-08 05:05:38 UTC

- reply

Collectivism vs individualism

2026-02-27 17:05:52 UTC

- reply

🤡

2026-02-27 17:05:44 UTC

- reply

🤡

2026-02-26 17:05:20 UTC

- reply

In other words, "he" should have committed suicide.

2026-02-17 13:30:37 UTC

- reply

Will give that a shot. Thank you.

2026-02-17 11:47:44 UTC

- reply

Where/how do you buy petrol using bitcoin?

2026-02-08 03:47:58 UTC

- reply

🤡

2026-01-30 12:10:36 UTC

- reply

Very well explained

2025-11-04 19:30:37 UTC

- reply

The midwit who merely realises he is a midwit stays a midwit... perhaps even becomes more mediocre through bitterness.

2025-09-30 19:07:46 UTC

- reply

Come to South Africa if you want to see how bad roads can get. Nobody here uses the "who will build the roads" argument to defend the state, but they are all still fucking statist slaves.
https://blossom.primal.net/ca95ab70330c969574c4823e226adde024c531201235467c074fb580c625cefb.jpg

2025-09-28 21:21:59 UTC

- reply

That's what she gets for eating their father and believing that she's a strong, independent woman capable of raising the kids as a single mom.

2025-09-14 10:53:49 UTC

- reply

In loneliness, the lonely one eats himself; in a crowd, the many eat him. Now choose.
Friedrich Nietzsche

2025-09-11 02:48:47 UTC

I’m not sure if the shooting of Charlie Kirk was a psyop or not, but if it was, it certainly worked on many of you. It’s important to think using reason instead of emotion.

2025-09-04 04:17:40 UTC

- reply

That first paragraph is poison. People are fuckedup precisely because they constantly want to change, improve, or achieve.

2025-09-03 13:31:20 UTC

- reply

It's called a spectacle... or circus for the slave class.

2025-09-02 04:22:00 UTC

- reply

Why do you feel compelled to be better today than yesterday, or to do something different? Don’t let the “conatus” or survival drive manipulate you or control your actions.

2025-08-24 04:47:49 UTC

- reply

Haha, no, I wasn’t aware of the beer. I heard the name from one of Larken Rose’s videos.

2025-08-23 05:07:24 UTC

- reply

Mango Mussolini

2025-08-21 17:19:16 UTC

- reply

Boundaries set by whom? If not set by myself, I do not care for them.

2025-08-21 17:17:45 UTC

- reply

I only care about my rules, in other words those I made for myself or those I agreed to follow. As you said, "mutually agreed rules...", anything else I'll ignore or break when I feel like it.

2025-08-21 16:03:34 UTC

- reply

The only rules I care about are my own; fuck everyone else's.

2025-08-16 13:20:04 UTC

- reply

The belief that you are "the one" is the oldest trick of life. It's just self-deception to think you will "save" or "fix" her where others have failed and you'll just get your ass kicked as well.

2025-08-10 09:26:08 UTC

- reply

Oh, yeah, I did not get the joke.

2025-08-09 19:23:15 UTC

- reply

Both religious creation myths and scientific “first cause” narratives are attempts to impose comforting order on the chaos of existence rather than clarity. This quest for first causes mirrors political compliance: arguing over who the ruler should be rather than rejecting the need for rule itself.

2025-08-09 04:14:14 UTC

- reply

I haven’t watched television or listened to the radio while driving since 2020. As a result, I’m better informed than anyone around me who still wastes their time with mind-numbing media. In 2021, I gave away the big TV I had, and the only remaining TV in my bedroom is for the CCTV cameras.

2025-08-09 04:08:22 UTC

- reply

RFK Jr. is cancelling mRNA because it wasn't deadly enough, it will be replaced by something "more highly effective".

2025-08-09 04:05:08 UTC

- reply

Positivity is an illusion that causes psychological suffering. Study negative philosophy, eat the controlling aspects of your life, and spit them out.

2025-08-06 04:12:53 UTC

- reply

They’re admitting that the government can't compete in a free market. Don't give parents too much credit; most will still choose government schools if they thought it offered better value for money.

2025-08-04 14:26:11 UTC

- reply

People eat bananas not for their taste, but for their shape.

2025-08-03 19:51:05 UTC

- reply

How can you be certain that the cub looked with “admiration” at its mother? You can’t, because you’re projecting your morality onto nature. This reminds me of this quote by Nietzsche:
"The effeminate and cowardly term 'Nature' applied by the nature enthusiasts (who are devoid of any sense of the cruel, implacable, and cynical elements in even the 'most beautiful' aspects of nature) is a sort of attempt to glean from nature Christian morality's notion of what is 'humane'"

2025-07-23 18:41:56 UTC

- reply

This part is a retreat into metaphysics disguised as science: "We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind."
Planck speaks of science then makes an assumption because he still craves a cosmic Father.... a cowardly relapse into the metaphysical need for meaning.

2025-07-23 04:29:34 UTC

- reply

I don't care for their laws, authority, morality, or opinions either. ;-)

2025-07-22 21:15:13 UTC

- reply

Fuck no

2025-07-22 09:49:55 UTC

- reply

The people who purchase this TV will likely use it for pornography.

2025-07-22 09:47:25 UTC

- reply

Congratulations

2025-07-20 19:25:15 UTC

- reply

🤘

2025-07-20 19:20:32 UTC

- reply

Remember when I mentioned that conservatives and progressives are similar? Progressives are leading the way, while conservatives are closely following. As things turned out, this is also the case with pedophilia.
#nevent1q…srlt

2025-07-20 05:48:18 UTC

- reply

Classic. Nostalgia mixed with disillusionment.
When one is young, one sees the world not as it is, but through the morality of one's time. Later, when the scales fall, one sees the abyss... and the truth behind all masks. People aren’t more divided... they're just more exposed.

2025-07-19 15:47:39 UTC

- reply

A young woman’s primary influence in the world, according to nature, comes through youth and beauty.... used, often unconsciously, to secure protection, status, or reproduction. As that influence fades, older women often try to reclaim a sense of importance by turning toward social control, gossip, and moralizing.

2025-07-06 07:00:46 UTC

- reply

You are a statist cuck!

2025-07-05 04:53:42 UTC

- reply

The only reason people know about Walker is because he is married to someone more interesting. He's just Carla’s husband.

2025-07-05 04:24:23 UTC

- reply

The truth wounds those who worship illusions.

2025-07-05 04:21:01 UTC

- reply

🤡

2025-07-05 03:46:26 UTC

- reply

Only the weak need to remind others of past victories to feel powerful in the present. Pride in one’s ancestors is the consolation of those who have nothing to show for themselves. And ridicule aimed at the conquered... especially when it masks the cowardice of modern comfort... is the clearest sign of a slave’s soul wearing the mask of a master.

2025-07-05 03:42:42 UTC

- reply

The UK is a nanny state... a decadent society trying to protect the weak from life’s realities.
However, a man who needs fireworks to feel free is already enslaved. "Merica numba one"... nationalistic bragging as the last refuge of those who seek meaning not in themselves but in collective identity.

2025-07-05 03:20:02 UTC

- reply

Celebrating freedom beneath a flag... the symbol of obedience to a nation, not liberation from it.

2025-07-05 03:16:05 UTC

- reply

Both ‘authority’ and ‘democracy’ are human inventions... lies told with varying degrees of success and widely accepted by the slaves.

2025-06-29 21:19:28 UTC

- reply

Only those who accept death fully can truly affirm life without illusions.

2025-06-28 08:31:48 UTC

- reply

The effeminate and cowardly term 'Nature' applied by the nature enthusiasts (who are devoid of any sense of the cruel, implacable, and cynical elements in even the 'most beautiful' aspects of nature) is a sort of attempt to glean from nature Christian morality's notion of what is 'humane' - Nietzsche
#nevent1q…h9p4

2025-06-26 19:32:15 UTC

The Earth is an energy conversion and recycling machine. Plants rearrange soil, water, and sunlight into leaves, fruit, and wood. Animals tear each other apart to rearrange flesh into new flesh. The planet constantly transforms matter from one form to another, molecule by molecule, and converts energy from one state to the next. What it cannot rearrange by itself, it accomplishes through living creatures: bees make honey, silkworms spin silk, oysters form pearls, and humans produce plastic.

2025-06-22 07:39:16 UTC

Politics exists because groups of parasitic collectivists demand what they have not earned. It makes no difference who you vote for... so long as you expect to gain at someone else’s expense, you remain a parasite.
https://blossom.primal.net/ac1d7a5c7fe0fc48970abaaedda017225ba878e9f414e64162d16bfe4e831981.jpg

2025-06-21 04:40:27 UTC

- reply

Jordan Peterson’s ideas help a lot of people, but he’s not for me. I’m more interested in questioning systems, not adapting to them. His focus on discipline and tradition feels more like maintaining the status quo than challenging it.

2025-06-21 04:33:58 UTC

- reply

Christianity, Judaism, and similar religions are branches of the same sick tree... a tree rooted in resentment, guilt, moral inversion, repression, obedience, afterlife fantasies, and hatred for the strong, joyful, and instinctual.
They glorify weakness, humility, suffering, and submission... not life, but escape from it.

2025-06-20 20:08:31 UTC

- reply

I don’t like Peterson. He teaches the nobility of suffering, obedience to order, and submission to tradition... like a modern-day ascetic priest, dressed in Jungian symbolism and drunk on scientism.
He speaks endlessly, but says very little.

2025-06-20 16:21:23 UTC

- reply

Yes, I’ll leave you with this. You might find it interesting:
The idea of free will was born out of religious necessity. Early religious institutions needed a framework to justify moral responsibility, sin, and punishment.
If people were truly free to choose good or evil, then it made sense to blame, punish, and condemn those who disobeyed divine law.
Without free will, hell makes no sense... how do you punish someone for doing what they were always going to do?
So the doctrine of free will became a tool of control:
- It made people feel guilty for natural desires.
- It justified obedience and submission.
- It gave priests and rulers moral high ground.
Even after the fall of religion, this belief lingered in secular culture because it flatters the ego. It says: “You are in control. You are responsible. You are the captain of your soul.” It feels empowering... but it’s a myth inherited from a religious system built to exploit guilt.

2025-06-20 16:05:24 UTC

- reply

Not necessarily.
Conformity and nonconformity are both driven by instinct... just different instincts.
For some, safety and belonging dominate. For others, truth, rebellion, or distrust of authority take over.
One person fears exclusion, another fears submission. Both responses are conditioned. Neither requires free will.
Nonconformity feels like a choice... but it’s often just the result of different wiring, different wounds, different causes.
The desire to break from the crowd isn’t proof of freedom... it’s proof that your internal compass points somewhere else, and you didn’t install that compass yourself.

2025-06-20 15:52:51 UTC

- reply

You’re assuming rebellion = freedom. But even rebellion has its roots.
Some are conditioned to obey. Others are conditioned to question.
The drive to stand apart, to stack sats, to seek truth anonymously... it too has causes: temperament, upbringing, trauma, books, chance, even brain chemistry.
You didn’t choose your nature. You didn’t choose your environment.
You didn’t choose to become the kind of person who questions.
The urge to break free is just another instinct.
So yes, I go against the herd. But not because I’m “free.” My behavior and thinking were shaped by childhood trauma caused by religion, control and narcissism.
People like Larken Rose, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Martin Butler, and others shaped my path.
I didn’t choose that path freely. I was thrown onto it.

2025-06-20 15:32:15 UTC

- reply

If free will were real, we’d expect wild, unpredictable divergence.
But what do we see?
Masses behaving the same, generation after generation... voting for the same hollow promises, defending the same dying systems, living the same scripts and calling it tradition.
They don’t choose freely... they inherit patterns. They mimic, conform, repeat and call it culture.
A few break the mold, yes... but not because they are “free.” Even rebellion has its causes.
So ironically, the sameness of the crowd is not proof against determinism... it’s evidence for it.

2025-06-20 14:34:46 UTC

- reply

When you say you’re choosing, you’re simply enacting the result of countless prior causes... your biology, your environment, your past experiences, your chemistry. You are not the captain of the ship... you are merely a passenger on the voyage. You think you’ve acted against instinct? You’ve only obeyed a deeper one.

2025-06-20 04:28:07 UTC

- reply

And worst of all?
We don’t even have free will.
What we call “choice” is just instinct in disguise.

2025-06-20 04:17:58 UTC

- reply

The fact that humans now kill each other more than nature kills us directly doesn’t prove we’ve escaped it.
It proves that nature now uses us to do its killing.
Nature still rules us... from within.
We haven’t escaped the law of the jungle.
We’ve just moved the jungle inside the city walls.
As Werner Herzog said, “nature is a harmony of overwhelming and collective murder.”
And we are part of that symphony. Human violence is not a failure of nature, but a function of it... nature doesn’t care who dies, only that something dies.
https://youtu.be/zLZYW9bF50A

2025-06-19 20:28:31 UTC

- reply

We haven’t conquered nature... it still pulls every string.
We eat, we fight, we procreate, we age, we die... just like any animal.
We still obey hunger, sex, fear, and death.
A heatwave kills thousands. A tremor topples buildings.
A flood submerges cities. A drought starves millions.
A hurricane flattens coastal towns.
And no matter how rich, powerful, or intelligent... we all rot, wrinkle, and die.
We are not a kingdom within a kingdom.
We are not above nature... we are of it, ruled by it, and returned to it.
Nature rules us by instinct...
from within, and through every breath, hunger, wound, and urge.

2025-06-19 19:48:33 UTC

- reply

No, that's one of modern man’s most arrogant and delusional beliefs.

2025-06-17 19:43:39 UTC

- reply

Correct. Only free spirits exist... for now.
They are the questioners, the doubters, the ones who step outside the herd.
But the Übermensch, the one who creates new values rather than merely rejecting old ones... he has not yet arrived.
Yes, many of our values passed through religion... but that doesn’t mean they belong to it. I don't deny the past, I just refuse to be owned by it.
You're right if you want people to defend Bitcoin’s 21M cap for centuries, you need more than math... you need myth.
The problem is if future Bitcoiners defend the cap not because they understand it, but because it’s sacred, we haven’t evolved... we’ve replaced one priesthood with another.

2025-06-17 19:08:56 UTC

- reply

Well said. Like house cats, they’re not truly domesticated by force, but by comfort.
They could stand on their own, but they prefer the warmth of the cage.

2025-06-17 17:34:16 UTC

- reply

Yes, most people are not strong enough to create their own values. They lack the inner strength, independence, and creative spirit needed to face the abyss of existence without inherited beliefs. For them, religion (and later, ideologies) provides ready-made meaning, rules, and morality. Most are incapable of bearing the burden of freedom. They need the illusion of moral certainty handed down from authority.

2025-06-17 16:25:20 UTC

- reply

Yes, religion is moral outsourcing, but it’s not just outsourcing. It’s giving up responsibility for your own soul.
Instead of thinking for themselves, people hand their conscience to a higher power and say, "Tell me what’s good. Tell me what’s evil. Just don’t make me decide."
They don’t become moral... they become obedient.
And the worst part? They call this obedience virtue.

2025-06-16 10:31:44 UTC

- reply

Absolutely, that's true.

2025-06-16 04:37:10 UTC

- reply

Trump doesn’t have deaths yet, but he needs them to rouse the American patriotic types into war. It’s possible that a “terrorist” attack, an assault on a military base, a warship, or any other Operation Northwoods-style false flag operation could be orchestrated to garner support from the masses.

2025-06-15 21:33:14 UTC

- reply

Netanyahu and Trump both rely on the deaths of their respective citizens to gain support for a large-scale war. I wouldn’t be surprised if they decided to make the Iron Dome less effective and potentially going to target a few Americans in the near future.

2025-06-15 05:44:43 UTC

- reply

I see it differently. The Matrix isn’t just the state... it’s our perception of reality itself.
It’s not some external force controlling us, but rather the internal framework through which we interpret the world.
That said, external forces... like the state, media, culture... can absolutely influence how that framework is built.
But the Matrix is not out there... it’s in here.

2025-06-14 06:11:36 UTC

- reply

Yes, glyphosate poisons the crops, and beer isn’t what it used to be. But that’s not why people drink less. It’s not about health. It’s not about avoiding worse hangovers. Most would welcome more brain damage... if it helped them escape the pain of facing reality.
But they no longer drink to forget. They no longer need to.
Narcotics, algorithms, infinite scrolling are more precise, more effective, more sterile tools for numbing the abyss.

2025-06-13 04:55:23 UTC

- reply

Hopefully the US Gov stays out of it.

2025-06-08 20:12:59 UTC

- reply

Thank you for the great explanation; it’s making a lot more sense to me the more I think about it. This is going to be a fun rabbit hole to explore.

2025-06-08 20:00:45 UTC

- reply

The top part of a tortoise shell, the scutes, grow by adding new layers at the edges and beneath older layers. It makes perfect sense that the Earth could grow similarly at the edges of tectonic plates.

2025-06-07 18:30:35 UTC

- reply

Did the vooters actually expect to get what they were promised? What a gullible bunch.

2025-06-07 09:51:34 UTC

- reply

Yes, well I'm with you on that too.

2025-06-07 09:45:46 UTC

- reply

Yes, I agree with that completely. Not what I meant though. We are just talking past each other now. This is pointless.

2025-06-07 08:44:29 UTC

- reply

On this we agree.

2025-06-07 08:31:21 UTC

- reply

When someone lives in constant fear of bioweapons, viruses, or “the end times”... and believes they have no agency to do anything but warn others or suffer, they have already surrendered. Not to their enemies, but to an internalised slave morality that praises fear and calls it righteousness.

2025-06-07 08:22:22 UTC

- reply

I get what you’re saying: “The enemy is real, it’s everywhere, and anyone who doubts it is helping them.”
But here’s the difference... I see the same forces you do. I just refuse to hand them my peace of mind on a silver platter.
When I talk about viruses and laws, I’m saying they become mental chains, more powerful in your mind than in reality. That fear becomes the tool of control.
You’re accusing me of playing into “their” hands because I won’t panic over their bioweapons, "viruses" and laws. But I see it the other way around... spreading fear is exactly how their trap works. People took the vaccine bioweapons in 2021 because they were fearful of an imaginary pandemic and they will take the next one for the same reason.
Panic is obedience... it’s the mental leash they don’t even have to hold anymore. I'm not dismissing the danger of bioweapons, just refusing to let it dictate my life. How does being fearful make a difference? Refusing to live in fear is the last real freedom we have. That’s the part they can’t touch.
If we keep arguing, we’re just going to talk past each other.

2025-06-07 07:06:18 UTC

- reply

Laws, like viruses, exist only in people’s minds and imaginations. I responded to Nadia the way I did because I can’t take a claim of “infrastructure” seriously without being told what it entails.

2025-06-07 06:56:53 UTC

- reply

Yes. It’s built into people’s minds and imaginations.

2025-06-07 06:32:11 UTC

- reply

My view is that viruses do not exist naturally or in laboratories, but "bioweapons" in the form of poisonous injections do.

2025-06-07 06:06:42 UTC

- reply

The faith in viruses is not built on evidence but on fear, and the need for illusion. And when illusions are collectively held, they become immune to reason. Not only is arguing over this subject futile, it’s a misstep, you did not arrive at this belief by reason, and you will not leave it by reason.

2025-06-07 05:46:04 UTC

- reply

I disagree

2025-06-06 21:04:55 UTC

- reply

Whether the tweet is real or not is irrelevant... nothing in politics is. It’s all just theatre for the slave class.

2025-06-06 20:57:08 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/a02b1b617e193fbe4d2bfd6637bcc5faffcc90fd4dde49bf21416953debb17ef.jpg

2025-06-06 16:25:52 UTC

- reply

Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt - Juvenal

2025-06-05 20:41:58 UTC

The older generation is gullible when it comes to the internet.
You were raised to trust: in the teacher, the man in uniform, the voice on the radio, the face on the TV, and that authority knows what is right.
You believed… because the TV told you to.
You believe what you see on a screen, without realising that what happens behind the screen is not always what your eyes are seeing.
Then came the internet. The smartphone. Social media.
A world without order and rules.
Now AI has distorted the game even further.
You will see faces that never existed, hear voices from people who never existed.
The instinct to believe is now a weakness… no longer a virtue… and it will be used against you.
https://blossom.primal.net/acf3a0c272e452d7fa43e4d63bde87849fd4ab1fee3db2b258e8335fa4a007ca.mov

2025-06-02 09:44:48 UTC

- reply

You flatter yourself far too much.
My day isn't so fragile that your smirk or sarcasm could undo it. I don’t live in a “moral high ground garden”... I simply refuse to wallow in the mud with those who mistake bitterness for brilliance.
You didn’t ruin anything. You revealed something: that you still believe petty jabs give you power. That’s cute.

2025-06-02 09:29:31 UTC

- reply

The old trick: "I’m not endorsing it, I’m just predicting it." A coward’s way of applauding violence with clean hands.
You say violence leads to violence... as if that's a profound insight, not the oldest excuse in history. But tell me, what do you do with that knowledge? Warn against it? Or quietly hope it justifies your hate?
You ask how I fight for freedom and justice... as if parroting historical clichés is the same as fighting for anything. True justice does not imitate its enemies. It does not lower itself to their level and call it “balance.”

2025-06-02 09:27:30 UTC

- reply

You are just like all the other slaves. If you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.

2025-06-02 09:25:23 UTC

- reply

Ah, the cry of the herd mind: “They broke the rules, so we must too.” You mistake resentment for justice, and imitation for strength.
You speak of double standards... but what you really want is equal permission to descend into the same pit. You don’t challenge the violent, you envy them. You don’t rise above, you crawl after.
Power doesn’t beg for fairness. It creates standards. It writes its own law.
But you? You appeal to rules as if they were sacred, only to trample them the moment they no longer serve your bitterness. That’s not a will to power.... that’s a will to revenge. The morality of the weak dressed in borrowed righteousness.
You invoke the actions of tyrants not to resist them, but to justify becoming one. In your hands, justice becomes mimicry, and mimicry becomes moral decay.
If you truly believed in higher values, you would hold to them in spite of others. Instead, you make your ethics dependent on your enemies... and that makes you their slave.